Military Review

JSC "NPK" KBM "put into service a modernized self-propelled anti-tank complex" Sturm-SM "

36
By the order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1186-Р from 30.06.2014, the modernized self-propelled anti-tank missile system Sturm-SM, developed by OAO NPK KBM (Kolomna), has been adopted.


"Sturm-SM" has a number of significant differences from its predecessor, "Sturm-S", which expands the possibilities of its use.

If Shturm-S operates only during the day when the operator sees the target, then the upgraded complex has the so-called “technical vision” - a thermal television sight, which allows it to work at night, as well as under adverse weather conditions: in snow, rain, fog.

The range of the controlled flight of the rocket is increased from 5 to 6 kilometers.





The “Sturm” family of missiles (as well as another development of the Khrysanthema-S ATKM ATKM) are unique in that they have a supersonic rocket flight speed, which allows them to be used to hit air targets. The maximum rocket speed is 550 m / s.

The rocket used modern element base and components. Due to this, increased reliability, which was confirmed by the test results. This allows you to abandon routine checks of missiles in the troops during the entire period of operation. All elements and components of the rocket - domestic production.

Another innovation of the upgraded missile is the new warhead. In addition to the tandem-cumulative and high-explosive with a volume-detonating composition, the composition of the military equipment included a high-explosive fragmentation warhead with a non-contact fuse, which makes it possible to destroy not only armored vehicles, low-flying Aviation enemy, engineering structures, but also manpower, including protected by bulletproof vests, as well as guaranteed to hit the target even if the rocket passes at a certain distance.

“Storm” is the only complex in the world that is installed on three types of carriers: ground, air and sea. Placed on tracked vehicles, helicopters Mi-8, Mi-24, Mi-28, Ka-29, Ka-52, on export versions of these helicopters, patrol boat.

Due to the fact that the missile complex received a second control system - laser beam, the range of carriers expanded. The disadvantage of the radio command SU was its bulkiness. Laser beam SU - lightweight and compact. This makes it possible to place the "Assault" on support combat vehicles tanks and BMP. In addition, the use of laser beam control system allowed to increase the accuracy of the hit.

The Scientific and Production Corporation “Engineering Design Bureau” (NPK “KBM”) was established in 1942 year. Over the 70-year period, more than 40 of various types of weapons were commissioned, including the Malyutka, Shturm-S and Shturm-V anti-tank systems, Strela-2 and Igla, and Tochka, "Point-U", OTRK "Oka". He is the lead developer of portable anti-aircraft (Igla-S), anti-tank (Chrysanthemus-S), operational tactical missile systems (Iskander-M), active protection complexes (Arena), protective equipment , maintenance tools. Included in the State Corporation "Russian Technologies". Director and General Designer - Valery Kashin.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. lexxxus
    lexxxus 3 July 2014 16: 23
    11
    Good weight! SE is waiting!
    1. portoc65
      portoc65 3 July 2014 16: 55
      +3
      The good news, new weapons, The combat readiness of the army is honed during exercises .. We are strong such. We can’t protect our own people. Yes, we cannot certainly introduce this new strong Army. Dill is so insolent that a new mines. across Sevastopol .. When they enter the Crimea, our strong Army will at least somehow react .. Slavyansk includes the junta troops .. the people are in shock .. we are silent
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Stalker
        Stalker 3 July 2014 17: 07
        -5
        Urgently !! while the junta did not run in all directions send a couple of tests !!! The nationalities were already frightened and the tanks began to sink ... laughing
        1. baltika-18
          baltika-18 3 July 2014 18: 19
          +4
          Quote: Stalker
          Urgently !! while the junta did not run in all directions send a couple of tests !!! National frustrations already and tanks began to sink
          Thailand what does Ukraine have to do? Photos from Thailand.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. svp67
            svp67 3 July 2014 19: 57
            -3
            Quote: baltika-18
            Thailand what does Ukraine have to do? Photos from Thailand.
            As what, the only country that bought the Ukrainian tank "Oplot" - Thailand ... I wonder how long they will also sink to the bottom ...
    2. svp67
      svp67 3 July 2014 19: 55
      +1
      Even the old women "assault - s" would be very happy there, from it not only tanks but also helicopters could be shot down ...
  2. alone
    alone 3 July 2014 16: 24
    +6
    I don’t even know what to say. If you eat Chrysanthemum-C, it wasn’t rational to let money into its large-scale production than to modernize the Sturm-S. BM Sturm-S is certainly not a bad car of its class, but frankly it’s already old with one starting element.
    1. sever.56
      sever.56 3 July 2014 16: 40
      +3
      And why more? There is only one control panel, and reloading is quick.
    2. Intensive
      Intensive 3 July 2014 17: 07
      +1
      As I understand it, we are talking about the development of a missile projectile control system, and not about a specific model of VT. Those. the system can be installed on various media and with a different amount of ammunition.
    3. Intensive
      Intensive 3 July 2014 17: 07
      0
      As I understand it, we are talking about the development of a missile projectile control system, and not about a specific model of VT. Those. the system can be installed on various media and with a different amount of ammunition.
    4. meriem1
      meriem1 3 July 2014 17: 38
      +2
      There is a block. after start-up, the bar goes down and takes out the next one from the store. Otherwise, it makes no sense.
    5. svp67
      svp67 3 July 2014 19: 59
      0
      Quote: lonely
      If you eat Chrysanthemum-C, it wasn’t rational to let funds for its large-scale release,
      Correctly and at the same time upgrade the existing "Assaults" to the "SM" level
  3. Giant thought
    Giant thought 3 July 2014 16: 25
    +3
    A unique weapon is not issued by a mountain of Russian masters.
  4. lexx2038
    lexx2038 3 July 2014 16: 26
    +6
    It is necessary to test secretly, I even know where.
    1. armageddon
      armageddon 3 July 2014 16: 43
      +3
      Hmm ... I think TESTS will not make MYSELF wait long ... Great news !!!
  5. nvn_co
    nvn_co 3 July 2014 16: 26
    +2
    Oh, like a hotman on SE-ke to see her .... Give a couple Arrow ... Oh, how such a hottz thing!
  6. bmv04636
    bmv04636 3 July 2014 16: 27
    +1
    as I understand it, an attack rocket is used
    1. sub307
      sub307 3 July 2014 17: 11
      +1
      Probably "Attack" (boom range 400-8000m), before it was like a rocket "Shturm" with 400-5000m.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. Arh
    Arh 3 July 2014 16: 29
    +3
    Our upgrade pleases !!!)))
  8. Appius
    Appius 3 July 2014 16: 41
    +2
    Is it recharged automatically?
  9. sever.56
    sever.56 3 July 2014 16: 43
    +3
    Good stuff. Pleased with the range and different ammunition! good
  10. ufa1000
    ufa1000 3 July 2014 16: 45
    -3
    Swamp with rocket winked
  11. Yellow white
    Yellow white 3 July 2014 16: 48
    +1
    I KNOW A COUPLE OF AREAS IN THE SOUTH-EAST ... EXCELLENT TEST POLICY!
  12. Vtel
    Vtel 3 July 2014 16: 49
    +3
    As it’s not all happy, the Nazis entered Slavyansk.
  13. Volgarr
    Volgarr 3 July 2014 16: 56
    +1
    If this "novelty" is exported, then there is already something more relevant!
  14. Yellow white
    Yellow white 3 July 2014 16: 58
    0
    WHAT TO O.L.E.N. NOTED BY MINUSING ...
  15. Vik.Tor
    Vik.Tor 3 July 2014 17: 04
    0
    Quote: lexxxus
    Good weight! SE is waiting!

    Oh, if all these dreams are my dream friend.
  16. alex56
    alex56 3 July 2014 17: 07
    +1
    Tell me, please, what is the difference between "Storm" and "Chrysanthemum"?
    Thank you in advance)
    1. psiho117
      psiho117 4 July 2014 00: 27
      +1
      another rocket, another principle of guidance.
      Chrysanthemum is more powerful, and + all-weather. Well, and more expensive, respectively))
  17. MSA
    MSA 3 July 2014 17: 10
    +1
    Good machine.
  18. BOB044
    BOB044 3 July 2014 17: 12
    0
    For combat tests in the SOUTH-EAST, the enemy has tanks and armored personnel carriers and manpower here to test.
  19. sv68
    sv68 3 July 2014 17: 34
    0
    the assault as well as the chrysanthemum on mtlb is set-good to good
    1. alone
      alone 3 July 2014 17: 38
      0
      Quote: sv68
      the assault as well as the chrysanthemum on mtlb is set-good to good

      The chrysanthemum is mounted on the BMP-3 chassis. It's not the same thing.
      1. psiho117
        psiho117 4 July 2014 00: 28
        0
        it exists on both chassis.
  20. tag17
    tag17 3 July 2014 17: 37
    +1
    It’s necessary to run in battle, real tests are always better than theory. The landfill is ready, Ukrainians are already crying ...
  21. shtraib
    shtraib 3 July 2014 17: 53
    0
    How are the storms radically different from chrysanthemums? Why have both?
    1. PLO
      PLO 3 July 2014 18: 02
      0
      Sturm-SM is the modernization of old complexes
  22. Demon0n
    Demon0n 3 July 2014 19: 01
    0
    Which of the specialists, please explain the purpose of creating a self-propelled complex (in the nth amount of wood) with the fact that, according to the big idea, it should be a manual anti-tank complex ... It is clear that you cannot mount a powerful thermal imager with decent optics on a soldier, but foreign experience suggests that what can be carried away on foot is quite enough for itself to deal with armored targets at sufficient distances. Why was it necessary, albeit light, but ... a tracked chassis, especially with an exclusively (even deadly not rational) narrow specialization? If it is needed, it might be easier to hang it on the existing types of armor, rather than fence the garden "one sneeze - one device"?
    1. shtraib
      shtraib 3 July 2014 19: 59
      0
      EMNIP, the maximum range of a manual RPG is 400 meters. Chrysanthemum beats at 6km.
      1. Demon0n
        Demon0n 3 July 2014 20: 25
        0
        Quote: shtraib
        EMNIP, the maximum range of a manual RPG is 400 meters. Chrysanthemum beats at 6km.


        Actually, I asked to clarify the situation with the need for a supersonic guided missile on a separate / dedicated light tracked chassis of specialists (or people who understand in this area). And where is the RPG? The article is about ... supersonic (i.e., a heavy rocket heavy enough to water everyone after running around with such a device behind it + a container and related systems) ... ATGM mounted on a light tracked chassis. For a long time there have been portable ATGMs with a sufficient missile range to combat armored vehicles.
    2. Nayhas
      Nayhas 3 July 2014 22: 19
      +1
      Quote: Demon0n
      Why was it necessary, albeit an easy, but ... tracked chassis, especially with exclusively (even murderously not rational) narrow specialization?

      Duc looks more impressive and brutal ... Just think of the guidance system of the 80s of the last century, but as it says here "All elements and components of the missile are of domestic production." Let it be Europe, the United States, and Israel are wise with technologies that ensure the principle of "fire and forget", we don't need it. We hope that after the launch of the ATGM, this bandura will be able to unnoticed one more shot at the enemy tank ...
      But seriously, this product is an attempt to fit a useless ATGM to modern realities. The use of a caterpillar chassis is absolutely unjustified, the mass of ATGMs is about 50 kg. The thermal imager with a laser target designator is also not very heavy. This complex will fully extend any wheeled vehicle, which will be much cheaper.
      The use of a semi-active laser guidance system is justified only for stationary targets, while on tanks sensors that detect the fact of laser irradiation have long been "standard equipment", these sensors give a signal where to fire smoke grenades by covering the tank with aerosols that scatter the laser beam and thermal interference. The automated control system automatically starts looking for a source of laser radiation with tank fire, and then covers this place with fire. Because the ATGM guidance system requires the constant participation of the operator of the complex, then about 10-20s. this machine cannot leave the line of sight, which is fraught with death for the entire crew ...
      1. sivuch
        sivuch 4 July 2014 09: 59
        0
        Useless - only in your opinion. ATGM shoot not only and not even so much at tanks.
        You can put it on the wheelbase (and you need it as an alternative). But the wheeled vehicle has a vile ability to sometimes get stuck on the roads. And then it happens to be pulled out of the swamp by a caterpillar.
        Laser radiation is usually conducted over the target and lowered it a few seconds before it hits.
        He shot and forgot, of course, well, but will such an ATGM see cold and non-contrast targets? The same Javelin - how many seconds does he need to remember the target?
  23. sivuch
    sivuch 3 July 2014 19: 12
    +2
    So in the West (if we use his experience), they also created ATGMs on a caterpillar base.
    And the specialization is not so narrow. In addition to armored vehicles and stationary shelters, you can shoot at rotorcraft and UAVs.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 3 July 2014 22: 34
      +1
      Quote: sivuch
      So in the West (if we use his experience), they also created ATGMs on a caterpillar base.
      And the specialization is not so narrow. In addition to armored vehicles and stationary shelters, you can shoot at rotorcraft and UAVs.

      This complex has purely nominal shooting at the CC. It has no means of detecting air targets. The optics' field of view is clearly narrow, the commander will not allow the commander to "drive" the thermal imager across the sky all day, so with a kick in the ass on the armor, look for helicopters in the air by the characteristic sound ...
      1. sivuch
        sivuch 4 July 2014 09: 51
        0
        But what if the external control center from the same PU-12M or Barnaul has already been canceled? The arrow-10 of its radar also had nothing, it shot down. There was a case, 2 A-10 per day
  24. Leshka
    Leshka 3 July 2014 19: 59
    0
    A new gift for Abroms good
  25. sivuch
    sivuch 4 July 2014 10: 51
    0
    From a similar discussion
    http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/50937/
    The funny thing is that "Shturm" has been in service since 1979 and there are more than 800 of them in Russia and about a hundred more in Belarus, and "Chrysanthemum" since 2005 and there are only a few dozen of them in service
    Maybe it’s easier not to take this cart in general, until it has some kind of curve?
    Easier. But what can you do - the "tachanka" is already in service, 2/3 of the anti-tank divisions in Russia are equipped with it, and it is easier and faster to modernize it (by installing a thermal imager, a laser command complex and re-equipping with a new ATGM "Attack" - armor penetration rises to 1000 mm, range - up to 6 km, adding the possibility of laser guidance) than waiting for the complete rearmament of the "Chrysanthemum". Moreover, it is necessary to replace the older ATGM "Konkurs" (up to 300 vehicles in the Russian Armed Forces, up to 150 in Belarus
  26. far
    far 4 July 2014 14: 23
    -1
    Russians, I am writing to you. I certainly understand that new weapons are being supplied to our army. I only welcome this. I myself am a military pensioner, I resigned due to the reform of Mebelsturmbannführer Taburetkin, and therefore the army is not indifferent to me. Only I want to ask our leadership, how would they explain to those mothers, fathers, children in Donbass, when they get up in the morning under volleys of obsolete Soviet weapons, and Russia says that it has tested a new weapon that has no analogues (or exceeds the existing one). Yes, it would be better, instead of scrapping the same Point "U" or X-55 (aircraft carriers Tu-95, Tu 160), simply send us Karachun. Even just without a warhead.
    1. ufa1000
      ufa1000 4 July 2014 20: 15
      0
      How to explain? Yes, everything is simple, right now in Russia it is fashionable to produce super new products in single copies)). It is better to have average quality, but in large quantities than vice versa. Take off right now 500 Soviet IL-2 attack aircraft to defend Donbas, with machine guns and bombs, from which much greater damage would be than for example from a dozen of the same SU-35. There were so many planes in the USSR that it was possible to cover the whole sky with them.