Washington beats the drums of war
I would like to please readers only with the good the news, or bring at least one good news. However, the concept of "good" has completely evaporated from American politics, it can not be found in any of the words or deeds of Washington, as well as the capitals of its European vassals. The Western world has become the focus of evil.
The article by expert Eric Suess confirms my findings that Washington is preparing to apply nuclear strike on Russia.
The US military doctrine has changed. Nuclear forces are no longer viewed as "weapon retaliation ", but as the main force to deliver a" preventive "strike. Washington broke the treaty on the limitation of missile defense systems concluded with the USSR in 1972 (which continued to operate in 90-s), and is actively completing the construction of an anti-missile "shield" against a possible Russian attack. Washington demonizes Russia and the Russian president with the help of the most shameless lies and propaganda, thus preparing the people of the United States and the satrap countries for war with Russia.
The neoconservatives convinced Washington that the Russian strategic forces are obsolete, worn out, for the most part unfit to use and are excellent targets for destruction. This misconception is based on outdated information a decade ago, similar to the analytical material of K. Lieber and D.Press
“Building up American nuclear superiority,” published in 2006 in Foreign Affairs magazine, the organ of the Council on Foreign Relations — the organization of the American elite.
Regardless of the state of Russian nuclear forces, the success of Washington’s first strike and the degree of protection that the American anti-missile “shield” will provide against the Russian “retaliation strike”, according to a well-known expert S. Starr, there will be no winners in this war. Everyone will die.
In an article published in December 2008 in the journal Physics Today, three meteorological scientists argue that even with a significant reduction in nuclear arsenals under the agreements on limiting strategic nuclear weapons (SALT, START, DOM) with 70000 warheads in 1986 before 1700 – 2200 by the end of 2012, this is enough to destroy all life on Earth. The authors came to the conclusion that in addition to the direct losses from the explosions, which will amount to hundreds of millions of people, "indirect consequences will lead to the death of the overwhelming majority of the population of the Earth." A shroud of smoke and microparticles from explosions, which will rise into the stratosphere, will lead to a "nuclear winter" and the death of all agricultural crops. Those who do not die from explosions and radiation will die of hunger.
Unlike its predecessors, the current US government refuses to recognize this. According to Washington, the death is something that is prepared for other, but not “elected” people (the Treaty on the Reduction of Strategic Offensive Potentials was also effectively bypassed by the United States, due to the fact that other nuclear powers of the US NATO allies did not take part in it. According to the Stockholm Peace Institute, nine nuclear powers have 16300 warheads at their disposal).
It is a fact that Washington politicians have convinced themselves that a nuclear war can be won, that it can be used to prevent the growth of Russia and China and establish the undivided world domination of the United States.
The US government, regardless of which party is in power, is the main threat to life on Earth. The European authorities, who consider themselves “the focus of civilization”, are not such as they connive at the goals of the United States to establish world hegemony. It is these goals that put the world on the brink of total extinction. The ideology that considers America to be “an exceptional and indispensable power”, called upon to dominate world politics, is the main danger for the whole world.
The complete or partial destruction of seven countries by Western countries at the beginning of the XXI century, with the help of “Western civilization” and the Western media, is a clear indication that the leaders of the Western world are completely devoid of morality and elementary human compassion. At the present time, when Washington has adopted the false doctrine of “nuclear superiority”, the prospects for the survival of mankind become very bleak.
Washington began to unwind the spiral of the Third World War, and the Europeans are also "in action". Most recently, in November 2012, NATO Secretary General Rasmussen stated that NATO does not see Russia as an adversary. Now, after the fool from the White House and his European vassals convinced Russia that they were her enemies, Rasmussen spoke of the fact that “we have to get used to the fact that Russia regards us as opponents” - after The West began to pump the military potential of Ukraine, as well as countries of Eastern and Central Europe.
In May, 2014, Mr. Alexander Vershbow, a former US ambassador to Russia, and now the Deputy Secretary General of NATO, declared that “Russia is our enemy” and that American and European taxpayers should scrape the last money for military modernization “not only of Ukraine, but also from Moldova, Georgia and Azerbaijan. "
You can, of course, consider these calls for increased military spending as the usual work of agents of the US military-industrial complex. Having lost the "war on terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan, Washington needs to launch a new campaign aimed at rebuilding the Cold War.
Perhaps this is exactly what the “captains” of the military-industrial complex, their “decoy ducks”, barkers, lobbyists, and part of the Washington establishment argue on. But neocons are more ambitious. They are attracted not only by the profits of the military-industrial complex. Their goal is US world domination, which means in practice the ruthless actions of the Obama regime and its European accomplices, creating threats to Russia in Ukraine.
Starting in the fall of 2013, the US government openly lied about events in Ukraine, accusing Russia of actions that were actually the result of Washington’s policies, demonizing Putin just as Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, Assad, Taliban and Iran had previously demonized. Press-tituki from the media and European capitals meekly repeated this lie and endlessly repeat it until now. Accordingly, the attitude of the American public towards Russia quickly began to change in a negative direction.
And how should Russia consider all this? Russia observes how NATO concentrates right on its borders, violating all agreements between Reagan and Gorbachev. Russia states that the United States has trampled all the missile defense treaties and are building an anti-missile "shield" in space orbit, like in films about "star wars." (Moreover, this shield will be created or not - it makes absolutely no difference. Its goal is to convince politicians and US citizens that they are "completely safe"). Russia sees that Washington is fundamentally (also contrary to all the treaties) changing the military doctrine, turning nuclear weapons from a means of "deterrence" into an instrument of "preventive strike". And plus to that, Russia daily observes streams of lies that are pouring from the West, as well as the massacre that Washington’s Kiev vassals committed in the South-East of Ukraine in relation to the Russian population, which Washington calls nothing but “terrorists” and helps to destroy they have white phosphorus bombs (banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention) - and even a protest squeak is not heard in the "civilized" West.
Massive shelling and rocket-bombing of residential areas, schools, and kindergartens in Russian Ukraine from the air took place on the days when 25 was celebrated since the suppression of the student demonstration in Beijing, on Tiananmen Square - an event for which Washington and its puppet stigmatized Chinese authorities, and which actually was not. As it has now become clear, there was no “slaughter” on this square - it was another Washington lie, like the “attack” of the Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin, as “weapons of mass destruction” by Saddam Hussein, like Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Iran’s nuclear bombs ", etc.
It is amazing that the whole world lives in a perverted, deceptive reality created by the lies of Washington.
The film "The Matrix" is an exact reflection of life in the West. The population lives in a false reality created for him by the rulers. Only a handful of people could escape from this lie and devoted their lives to the struggle for the return of fellow citizens to reality. They saved Neo, "number one", which is able to free people from the fetters of lies. Morpheus, the rebel leader, says Neo: “The matrix is a system. This system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, and what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. We want to preserve and restore the very consciousness of these people. But as long as we succeed, they are part of this system and, accordingly, our enemies. You must understand that most of them are not ready to "disconnect" from the system. And many are so used to it, and so hopelessly dependent on it, that they will defend it with all their might. ”
I experience similar emotions every time after writing the next column of the editor. Protests from those who are resolutely unwilling to “disconnect” come in hundreds of e-mails are published on those websites where the authors engage in slander by submitting dwarf trolls from the government hostile to people. “Do not believe the true reality,” they instruct, “believe our falsehood and our lies!”
The matrix also captures a part of the Russian and Chinese population, especially those who studied in the West and those who fell into the net of Western propaganda, but in general the population understands where the truth is and where it is a lie. The problem with Washington is that propaganda that zombies people in Western countries does not affect Russians and Chinese.
How should China react, which sees the United States declaring the South China Sea a “zone of its national interests”, that 60% of its naval fleet are concentrated in the Pacific Ocean, off the coast of China, that the US Navy and Air Force bases are everywhere from the Philippines to Vietnam?
Suppose that all this is done in order to force taxpayers to fork out and give the opportunity to unwind all the new arms race, paying for the crazy expenses of the MIC, giving profits to corporations, laundering money for politicians, etc. But can the leaders of Russia and China consider actions Washington in this limited way?
To date, the Russians have acted quite conciliatory. Foreign Minister Lavrov said: “At this stage, we are ready to give our partners a chance to calm down. And then we'll see. If absolutely groundless accusations against Russia continue, if economic pressure is attempted, we can overestimate the situation. ”
If a fool is from the White House, Washington media prostitutes and European vassals will convince Russia that war is a trump card in their deck, so be it. Since it is obvious that NATO is unable to concentrate ground forces against Russia, comparable to the Hitlerite armada before the attack in 1941, the war will inevitably be nuclear, which means the end for all of us.
Remember this when Washington and its media starts to beat the drums of war. Remember also that for many years everything that Washington and its press-titled borzopisty says from beginning to end is a lie that serves the interests of a handful of rulers. You are unable to influence the situation through elections by voting for Republicans or Democrats.
Thomas Jefferson gives us a solution: “The tree of liberty should be irrigated from time to time by the blood of patriots and tyrants. This is his natural fertilizer. ”
In Washington, there are few patriots and many tyrants.
Paul Craig Roberts
American social activist, economist, political scientist, director of the Institute of Political Economy.
Republican, former Deputy Secretary of the Treasury (1981 – 1982).
Ph.D., worked as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
Former editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, Washington Times. After he criticized the policies of George W. Bush, he has not been allowed to publish in the country's main newspapers since 2004.
Author of the books: “The collapse of the free market and the economic decay of the West”, “How we lost America.”
- Paul Craig Roberts
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.