World "after Ukraine"
On the threshold of a new round of crisis "around Ukraine", it is not bad to look at its beginning. According to Lyndon LaRouche, an American analyst, the Ukrainian provocation of the United States is aimed at breaking Russia in Ukraine, making it Poland so to speak, or at least weakening it as much as possible. According to circumstances, as it will. How is this plan implemented in practice?
By creating such a threat to Russia in Ukraine, to which it can not help but respond. Will be forced to "fight", that is, to send troops. This plan, in fact, would be a “second Afghanistan” for Russia, a continuation of the strategy of Zbigniew Brzezinski. Making Russia a new “Afghanistan” in Ukraine seemed to be his secret dream, he could not resist and leaned out at the start of the Ukrainian events with the prophecy: Putin will suffer a defeat ...
The emergence of a neo-Nazi Bandera Ukraine after the February coup in Kiev was really a threat, but which Moscow reacted to. But not at all as it once was at the threat of creating a US base in Afghanistan. Moscow responded to the February call by President Yanukovich “to send troops” by refusal, and the “Afghan party” of Washington in Ukraine did not go according to the plan of Brzezinski.
Moscow responded to the Bandera coup in Kiev by holding a referendum in the Crimea, and the peaceful inclusion of a “strategic Black Sea carrier” in Russia, according to a vote. So that no one bothers to challenge this referendum militarily, Putin secured permission from the Federation Council of the Russian Federation to send troops to Ukraine in the event of a catastrophic development of events, but the troops never entered. Despite the outbreak of civil war against Bandera in the Donbass.
NATO Secretary General Rasmussen says, in this regard, about the "new style of war" of Russia. Indeed, Russia-USSR reacted differently to hypothetical threats to its security, for example, in Afghanistan, and sought to preempt them. The Soviet Union sent troops to Afghanistan on the basis of a possible threat to its security, and suffered significant damage when Afghanistan became a “hot spot” for a long time.
The highly probable consequences of the neo-Nazi threat from Ukraine also demanded the introduction of troops, but Russia, perhaps on the basis of the experience of Afghanistan, turned to a real-politic strategy, following the real situation in Ukraine, which did not at all require the immediate introduction of troops. The current political moment in Ukraine, the introduction of Russian troops did not improve, for Russia, if not worsened. And this was the only correct move of Russia in the “Ukrainian Party” with Washington.
Moreover, Russia began to pursue real-politic vis-à-vis the entire West. This came as a surprise to Washington, he was confused, and began to lose the neo-Nazi pace taken in February. This is the new secret “style of war” of Russia: to respond to a specific situation in Ukraine and in the world, and not to pre-empt hypothetical consequences.
Due to the absence of “troops injected” into Ukraine, that is, the “visible aggression of Russia”, Washington had to apply sanctions weapon to Russia under the suction of the charges of escalation of tension in Ukraine. We note that if the entry of troops into Ukraine took place, such a confusion would have begun in the world that the question of sanctions would hardly have arisen: economic ties would break off naturally on the basis of force majeure. As a response to the aggression of Moscow.
The threat of real economic sanctions is a natural continuation of Washington’s Ukrainian policy after failing to provoke “aggression”, just another way to weaken Moscow. Therefore, these sanctions are supported by an ultimatum, and demanding complete surrender: to change Russia's policy on Ukraine to be pro-Western, that is, to surrender, as Poroshenko proposes to New Russia, at the mercy of Bandera and American "democracy."
What then will Washington demand after that, because sanctions can be threatened forever? So far, he wants Russia to help him finish in Ukraine what was not possible after the coup, that is, to help Bandera suppress the Donbass-New Russia. But Russia will definitely not be helping to drive itself into a corner, it is better to “suffer”, comrade Sukhov, whom Washington does not know, said in such cases.
Washington’s ultimated tone indicates that the question of sanctions by the Americans has already been resolved, it follows from the general plan of the “Ukrainian provocation”. Moscow also understands this. Meshkov from the Foreign Ministry said unequivocally recently that some forces in the United States are seeking sanctions, and they will be imposed under any far-fetched pretext. Moscow cannot do anything here if the United States decided to somehow try to weaken Russia. Events in Ukraine are just an excuse created for this. But the US is slow, because Europe, namely Germany, is obstinate.
Dodavit Washington Berlin, or not, we will not guess. Will we impose sanctions alone - we won’t guess too. But the sanctions are not equivalent to the “little war,” one can reply to Mr. Brzezinski, apparently, the author of the “Ukrainian provocation.” By sanctions it is impossible to achieve what a “little war” gives. Russia will simply go to the eastern markets, and in general, will turn to the East, the Moscow-Beijing axis is already becoming quite tangible, in the form of the announced Power of Siberia gas pipeline to China. And a cold peace will be established with the West.
However, these sanctions are Washington's last trump card in the Ukrainian party, and he seems to be afraid of throwing him into the game himself, because it is impossible to predict how this will end. However, one consequence is obvious: in response to the sanctions, after the completion of the “Ukrainian party” in this way, Russia recognizes the Novorossiysk republics, with all the ensuing consequences for the Bandera Ukraine.
After the imposition of sanctions, Washington will have no means of pressure on Moscow, while Moscow, on the contrary, will untie its hands on carrying out its policy: it will not be worse. Real-politic in the situation “after Ukraine” demands that Russia recognize Novorossia.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.