What is behind the peacekeeping steps of China in Libya

3
On Wednesday 22 June, Mahmoud Jibril, one of the leaders of the Libyan rebel forces, visited the capital of China with a two-day visit to Beijing. The Chinese side organized a high-level meeting of the guest, and Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi will hold talks with him, as well as the leaders of the international department of the Communist Party Central Committee. The diplomatic efforts of China are primarily related to the desire to prevent the possible loss of contracts in Libya worth more than 19 billions of dollars. It is worth noting that today, in terms of contacts at the interstate level with Tripoli and Benghazi, Chinese Beijing, which has not previously declared itself a mediator in the Libyan confrontation, bypasses the rest of the world states, including Russia, which has taken on the role of an official mediator.



Mahmoud Jibril, who heads the executive committee of the Libyan National Transitional Council and supervises relations with the outside world in Benghazi, is not the first high-ranking Libyan official who visits the capital of China, before him a two-day visit to the Libyan Foreign Ministry Abdul Ati al-Obeidi.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of China has lavished praise on the National Transitional Council, which has become Libya’s main political force, calling it "an important partner in the dialogue."

As you know, China did not take a firm position in the war between the forces of the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and opposition groups, and he abstained in March when the UN Security Council issued a NATO resolution on the right to launch air strikes against the forces of the government army. But at the same time, China was in constant contact with both parties to the conflict in the interests of a political settlement.

"The representation of the National Transitional Council of Libya is expanding daily, step by step, since its inception, and this is important for the development of domestic political power," said Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi in an interview with Mahmoud Jibril.

The representatives of China did not go into the essence of the negotiations, saying only that their main task was "to promote the peace negotiations." Thus, for the first time since the beginning of the armed confrontation in Libya, China officially announced its peacekeeping ambitions, as is known until this time, the Chinese limited themselves only to condemning the bombings of Libyan cities and calling for peaceful negotiations, but never mentioned their intention to facilitate this process. To date, the official mediators in the Libyan conflict are Russia and the Union of African States.

But it can be assumed that China’s interest in holding peace talks is explained not so much by peacekeeping tasks as by the desire to avoid significant financial losses. In the past five years alone, Beijing has invested almost 50 billions of dollars in more than 19 commercial projects in Libya, and 13 of China’s largest state-owned companies are operating in the country. The huge scale of the Chinese presence in the North African country is evidenced by the fact that for the first time during the days of armed confrontation Beijing evacuated the 35 of thousands of its citizens who were involved in various jobs. Projects involving China are distributed throughout Libya. Many of these projects are located in the territories controlled by the army of Muammar Gaddafi. That is why the representatives of Beijing began active negotiations with each side of the confrontation.

It is obvious that the Chinese authorities are not at all interested in the fate of civilian Libyan citizens who are susceptible to the daily threat of becoming victims of armed confrontation. The money invested in various companies and possible profits is China’s main interest. They have a supply of proposals for both sides of the confrontation - Gaddafi they promise lobbying interests in the UN Security Council, and the rebels have the money they need so much today. And there will be nothing surprising in the fact that tomorrow in Beijing, with all the pompousness, they will not meet the representatives of Muammar Gaddafi.


Sources of:
http://www.china-defense-mashup.com/china-says-libya-rebels-as-important-political-force.html
http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1664384
http://www.inosmi.ru/fareast/20110623/171058834.html
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

3 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mitrich
    +1
    25 June 2011 10: 19
    These contacts between Beijing and Libyan rebels are further confirmation that Gaddafi's fate is sealed. The Moor has done his job, the Moor must go. The Chinese are strict pragmatists, they are no longer interested in the leader of the Jamahiriya, this fact, by the way, is food for thought for the patriots of the domestic spill, who believe that Russia has "betrayed" Libya, leaving it to be eaten by NATO wolves.
    China is corny buying up Africa. In particular, in Libya, before the conflict began, Beijing had interests worth one and a half ten billion dollars, several tens of thousands of Chinese specialists worked in the country in the field of oil production, construction, and transport communications. The Chinese do not want to lose their presence in the country, since Djibril arrived in Beijing.
    The global competition for energy between the PRC and the USA has begun. In this regard, the active participation of Americans in the division of the Sudan into the northern and southern parts seems completely understandable. In Sudan, the presence of the Chinese before the partition of the country was generally overwhelming, compared to other great powers. As for Libya, Paul Roberts, the former US Under Secretary of the Treasury (under the administration of President Reagan), recently stated bluntly that the United States is not fighting Gaddafi in Libya, but with China.
  2. +1
    25 June 2011 20: 47
    mitrich, and rightly so, unlike our iPod posers.
  3. Sergey M.
    +1
    26 June 2011 12: 05
    So we can be sold indiscriminately.
    Hey - you, and does the Libyan people take into account?
    And the people of RUSSIA?
    Who's next?
    As in childhood - a game - one-two-three-four-five - I go to look. Ready or not, here I come.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"