Sarajevo Murder and Today

27
Sarajevo Murder and Today

1 August 1914, the world was shocked by the start of the First World War. There were many reasons for the war, but a reason was needed to start a conflict. The reason for this was the murder of 28 Jun 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and his wife, the High Duchess Sophia-Maria Hohenberg, by a serb Gavril Princip. This murder was the reason for the war of Austria-Hungary and Serbia. In response, Russia began to mobilize the army, and Germany declared war on the Russian Empire. Russia was supported by its allies on the Entente - France and England, so the all-European war began.

Franz Ferdinand Karl Ludwig Josef von Habsburg was the eldest son of Archduke Karl Ludwig (brother of the Austrian Emperor Franz Joseph) and the Princess of Both Sicily, Maria Annunziata. Aged Emperor Franz Joseph I reigned from 1848 onwards and outlived his heirs. The only son and heir to Emperor Franz Joseph, Crown Prince Rudolph, was killed in 1889 in the castle of Mayerling. According to the official version, he killed his beloved Baroness Maria Evening, and then shot himself. However, it is believed that the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire was the victim of a conspiracy - it was a political assassination disguised as suicide. After this mysterious murder, Archduke Karl Ludwig was considered the heir to the throne of the empire. He transferred this right to his son, but this renunciation did not have legal force. According to Austrian law, absentee absenteeism of the heir to the throne was not legal, the current emperor or prime heir at the time of the transfer of the throne could abdicate the throne. However, in 1896, Karl Ludwig unsuccessfully drank water from the Jordan River, fell ill and died. The official heir was the nephew of the emperor Franz Ferdinand.

Franz Ferdinand became the main hope of the decaying Austro-Hungarian Empire. In 1906, the heir to the throne formulated the idea of ​​transforming Austria-Hungary, which could extend the life of the Hapsburg Empire. Created with the help of a politician and a lawyer of Romanian origin, Aurelia Popovich, the plan suggested the federalization of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The politician proposed to create the United States of Great Austria (German: Vereinigte Staaten von Groß-Österreich), which solved the problem of interethnic contradictions in the empire, where the Germans made up only about 25% of the population and formed the political, military, financial, industrial and scientific-cultural elite of Austria. Of Hungary. Another privileged nationality was the Hungarians, who achieved their rights through a long and hard struggle, which almost destroyed the Hapsburg Empire. In 1867, the Austro-Hungarian Agreement was concluded, which transformed the Austrian Empire into Austria-Hungary - a constitutional dualistic monarchy. The other numerous peoples of the empire - the Czechs, Croats, Slovaks, Slovenes, Serbs, Rusyns, Little Russians, Poles, Romanians and Italians, did not have the rights and opportunities possessed by the Germans-Austrians and Hungarians.

However, this did not solve the national question in the empire. "Patchwork empire" came to its collapse, only external impulse was needed. Franz Ferdinand and Aurel Popovic wanted to continue the reform and establish a trialist federation (Austria-Hungary-Slavia). It could breathe new life into the old empire. Popovich proposed creating autonomous equal regions ("states") around 15 on a national-territorial basis. In addition, they planned to establish several national enclaves (mostly German) in Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary and Transylvania. Autonomy in the framework of its "state" received some major cities: Prague, Budapest, Lviv, Brasov and others. Each large nationality received its autonomy and all the conditions for the development of national culture, language and economy. So it was proposed to highlight:

- German Austria (Austria, South Tyrol, the southern part of the Czech Republic);

- Germanic Bohemia (north-western part of the Czech Republic);

- Germanic Moravia (northeastern part of the Czech Republic), German predominated in these three areas;

- Czech Bohemia (central and southern Bohemia);

- Slovak lands (Slovakia);

- Polish Western Galicia (Lesser Poland);

- Eastern Galicia (Rusyns);

- Hungary (Hungary, southern Slovakia, northern Vojvodina);

- Hungarian Szekey lands (Skekei region - the territory of residence of Hungarians in Transylvania, modern Romania);

- Romanian Transylvania (Transylvania, Banat, Bukovina);

- Italian Trento (Trentino);

- Italian Trieste (Trieste, Gorica, western Istria);

- Slovenian Region (Krajna, South Carinthia);

- Croatia (Croatia (Croatia, Srem, Kotor Bay);

- Serbian-Croatian Vojvodina (Vojvodina).

Thus, several problems were solved. First, the Habsburg Empire remained, it got a chance to update and maintain the status of a great power. This was in the interests of the house of the Habsburgs. Secondly, the Slavs received their autonomous regions. In particular, this reconciled the Czech national movement. Slavs benefited from the creation of Austria-Wengro-Slavia. Thirdly, the nationalists were able to direct their energy to a peaceful course, to the development of their autonomies, and not to the destruction of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.



However, this idea had strong opponents. So, the Hungarian elite was the uncompromising opponent of the triune state. The plan threatened Hungary’s exceptional position, which, thanks to the 1867 agreement of the year, gained power over the 1 / 2 of the Hapsburg Empire. For example, Transléitania (lands located on the eastern side of the Leita-Litavy river) included the Kingdom of Hungary, including the Grand Duchy of Transylvanian, the Kingdom of Croatia and Slavonia, the free port city of Fiume. The Hungarians emphasized the presence in Hungary of the “only political nation - indivisible Hungarian nation” and actively pursued a policy of Magyarization. Hungarian nobility did not want to lose land and political influence in the empire. Things reached the point that the Hungarian Prime Minister, Count István Tisza, said: "If the heir to the throne decides to carry out his plan, I will raise the Magyar national revolution against him and erase it from the face of the Earth." As a result, there was even a version of the “Hungarian footprint” in the attempt on the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne.

Yes, and Vienna itself Franz Ferdinand had opponents. So, the archduke, like many other representatives of the Austrian nobility, did not like Russia and even more Serbs. But, the heir had enough sense to understand the obvious: a preventive war with Serbia would lead to tragic consequences. The clash with Serbia led to a conflict with Russia, and this had serious consequences, including the collapse of the “patchwork empire”. Franz Ferdinand was a realist and tried his best to avoid such a conflict. By this he caused the hatred of certain forces in the Habsburg Empire itself and the powerful forces that led Europe to the slaughter and had already written off the Austro-Hungarian, German and Russian empires.

Another force that wanted to eliminate the Duke was the Serbian nationalists. They wanted to destroy Austria-Hungary in order to build "Great Serbia". The Balkans during this period were (as now) a real breeding ground for the games of various special services, secret organizations, terrorists, revolutionaries, and outright bandits. Here, one after another, secret organizations appeared - Black Hand, Mlada Bosna, Freedom, and others. So, the attempt on the Archduke was organized by the Serbian nationalist organization "Black Hand" ("Unity or death"). Its branch in the captured Austro-Hungarian Empire of Bosnia was the organization “Mlada Bosna”, to which the killer of the Austrian throne belonged to high school student Gavrilo Princip.

The secret organization was created by the head of the Serbian counterintelligence, Colonel Dragutin Dmitrievich, nicknamed “Apis” (the sacred bull in ancient Egyptian mythology). “Apis” was a patriot of Serbia, an enemy of Pan-Germanism and dreamed of building a “Great Serbia”, and for this it was necessary to destroy Austria-Hungary. The problem was that Dmitrievich, Tankosich and other organizers of the “Black Hand” were not only Serbian patriots, but also members of Masonic lodges. Among them was the Serbian minister L. Chupa, a prominent hierarch of "freemasons" who was associated with the Belgian and French masons. It was he who oversaw the organization. And the organization, after the coup 1903 of the year, when the Serbian king Alexander Obrenovic and his wife Draga were killed, occupied leading positions in Serbia. The conspirators entered the entourage of the new king Peter, occupying the highest military posts.

The agitation of the organization was carried out with pan-Slavic, patriotic and great Serbian positions. To achieve the main goal - the creation of "Greater Serbia", planned by war, with the mandatory participation of the Russian Empire. Thus, there was a big game, the Serbs were seduced with the idea of ​​“Great Serbia”, Russia was generally drawn into the war “into the dark”, it did not need this war. The “hawks” parties in Austria-Hungary and Germany also wanted war, but did not calculate all the consequences of the war, hoping for a “blitzkrieg” against France, and then a quick separate peace with Russia, which would lose its main ally in Europe. England had to stay away.

In reality, all the benefits were obtained by the forces behind England and the United States, the backstage structures of the time (their component were the Masonic lodges), and planned to build the New World Order on the ruins of the Austro-Hungarian, German and Russian empires and significantly enrich themselves.

"Black Hand" had a great influence in Serbia, established branches in Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Bosnia. The King of Serbia, Peter I Karageorgievich and the head of the government, Nikola Pasic, did not share the views of the radical organization, but could not control its activities. Everything was done so that Vienna saw in Belgrade the culprit of the death of the Archduke. Before the assassination, the terrorists were brought to the Serbian capital, where they were trained in the royal park dash, armed with Serbian pistols and bombs. In fact, a “Serbian trace” was specially created.

Apparently, in Vienna, there were also people who benefited from a loud murder. Serbian Prime Minister Pasic and the Russian ambassador to Serbia Gartvig, through their agents, learned about the attempted assassination and notified the Vienna Court. However, the Austrian government did not cancel the visit of the Archduke to Sarajevo and did not take proper measures to enhance security. As a result of June 28, the terrorists were able to organize two assassinations at once. The first was unsuccessful - an explosive device, abandoned by Nedelko Gabrinovich, killed the driver and wounded several people. This attempt, oddly enough, did not become a reason for strengthening the protection of Franz Ferdinand or his immediate removal from Sarajevo. Moreover, the protection of the heir to the throne on this day was suspiciously cut. The terrorists were able to make another attempt.

From the Emblake Embankment, the Archduke’s motorcade turned into Franz Josef’s street, General Oscar Potiorek began to scold the driver that he had gone the wrong way. The car (it was open) tried to turn around, but in a narrow place filled with citizens, it was difficult to do. At this time, Gavrilo Princip jumped out of the crowd, picked up a revolver and fired twice. His hands shook with fear, and he hit the woman - Sophia, the archduke covered her with himself, and a third bullet struck Franz. The crowd twisted the killer and almost tore him apart; the Principle was saved by the police. Gavrilo Princip tried to poison himself, but the poison did not work (another oddity). For some reason, the injured Franz and Sophia were not taken to the hospital, which was only a couple of blocks away, but to the residence of Potiorek, where they died due to blood loss without receiving medical assistance.

The conspirators from Mlado Bosna were convicted, adults were executed, and juveniles were imprisoned. In the 1917 year, Princip principle, Gabrilovich, Grabeche, who were sitting in an Austrian prison, with self-synchronization in a few weeks, “themselves” died. The leaders of Black Hand on the contrived accusation (they allegedly wanted to open the front of the Austrian army) were arrested and shot in 1917 year. In 1918, the archives of the Sarajevo process disappeared. In the 1919 year, when Vienna wanted to return the Belgrade archives to Serbia (they were captured during Serbia’s occupation during the war), the vessel carrying the documents went missing on the Danube along with the crew. Thus, direct witnesses and documents disappeared.

This event led to a global catastrophe. Obviously, the death of the heir to the throne of the Hapsburg Empire with his wife could not lead to war. However, certain forces wanted war, and they achieved it. Everything was ready. Serbian patriots dreamed of "Greater Serbia", Vienna - defeating Serbia, Berlin - defeating France and redistributing the colonies, world markets in their favor, France wanted to take revenge for the defeat of 1870-1871, England needed to destroy the industrial power of Germany and her fleet. Only Russia did not want war.

Great role in stirring up conflict was played by England. When the German emperor ordered Moltke to begin preparations for an operation against France, London took an evasive position. London did not offend Berlin, did not promise support to the Allies on the Entente. There were debates in the cabinet and parliament. As a result, Wilhelm II had the false impression that England would remain aloof from the conflict (she did not give official commitments to support France and Russia). This was not surprising, since London was traditionally kept apart from Europe. The German ambassador to the British Empire Likhnevsky met with British Foreign Secretary Gray and concluded that England would not interfere in the conflict. Therefore, when 5 August England declares war on Germany, it came as a surprise to the Kaiser. However, the war could not be stopped, the German corps had already broken through to France.

So the war began, which claimed millions of lives, destroyed millions of lives, destroyed the Austro-Hungarian, German, Ottoman and Russian empires, greatly changed the political map of the world and even the old value systems. All the benefits of the war received t. BC. Financial International, England and the United States. The financial-industrial clans welded huge amounts of capital in the war, destroyed the aristocratic elites of the old empires, which "outdated" and hindered the construction of a new, "democratic" world order. The main competitors of the Anglo-Saxon elite and large Jewish capital — Russia and Germany — were straightened out among themselves and eliminated.

Currently, the same forces seek to repeat the successful experience. Once again, a world conflict is being fomented on the planet, and Russia is playing the role of "main production". The Iraqi, Syrian and Ukrainian "fronts" are already in place, a long-term strategy is clearly visible for implementing the plan to create a controlled chaos zone in Eurasia.

In general, the situation is repeated. Only now the role of Germany is played by China, which is crowded with the US political and economic Olympus (at the beginning of the 20th century, Germany crowded England). Russia is again entering a country that can, in alliance with China (as it used to do with Germany) and other Eurasian centers of power - Iran, India, challenge the Atlantic elite. In addition, Russia is the “main prize” of the world confrontation. The territory, which in the projected global biosphere catastrophe will suffer the least losses. A country with vast areas of agricultural land, water, forest resources and whole ecosystems that are little or little affected by human activity.

Moreover, we see a repetition of the situation in the fact that the overwhelming part of the current Russian “elite”, like a hundred years ago, is infected with Westernism, there is no Russian spirit in it. The Russian "elite" is subordinated to Western cultural and civilizational values, keeps children, wives and capital in the West. Attempts are also being made to rely on official religious cults and formal patriotism. However, given the huge social stratification in society, this only worsens the situation in the Russian Federation, as people do not have faith in the hierarchs, in whom there is no holy spirit and "patriots" - officials who have millions and billions in revenues.

The current Slavyansk is the 21st century Sarajevo. The scenario of the destruction of the Russian Federation has already been written. The masters of the West have prepared an excellent trap from Ukraine. Moscow in front of the "fork". Does not interfere - "Putin leaked". At the exit, the “Russian Maidan”, where the liberals will be supported by the patriots, and the situation will be aggravated by the growth of “political Islam” (the Wahhabi underground).

Late intervention - "Putin threw in." The war for Donbass does not have a strategic sense - it will be necessary to advance on Dnepropetrovsk, Odessa, Kiev and Lviv. And this is in conditions when the “Ukrainian Reich” is already strong, has created capable forces. At the same time, the West will find both money, and resources, and people — the “fighting units of chaos” in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Kosovo and other zones of inferno are ready. Then the West will blow up the South Caucasus (Nagorno-Karabakh) and Central Asia (The goal of the owners of the West - chaos in Eurasia; Part 2). There everything is already prepared for the explosion.

Under the conditions of liberal “elite” domination in Russia itself, Russia in this confrontation is doomed to defeat. The same scenario will lead and the internal "Maidan." The sharp increase in expenses (only Crimea needs to spend from 800 billion to 1 trillion rubles - words of the head of the Ministry of Regional Development of Russia Igor Slyunyaev), a serious deterioration in the lives of the masses, hundreds of thousands of refugees, the conflict between the “indigenous-migrants”, “Muslims” Christians ”, the Wahhabi underground, problems of the Caucasus, etc., all this leads to a revolution. Russia will find itself in the situation of the Russian Empire during the First World War, when its main and best forces will be on the Ukrainian, Caucasian, Central Asian, and possibly Volga (growth of nationalism and Wahhabism in Tataria) fronts. In such conditions, an internal explosion can lead to complete collapse.

The only way out is an immediate rejection of Western values, and the return of Russia to its path of development, as a separate Russian civilization, which has a goal and a program on the planet. Russia needs a cleansing of liberals and compradors, the formation of a national, patriotic elite that will defend the interests of the Russian civilization and the people, and not play other people's games.

Further recipes for the restoration of Russia are known: genuine democracy based on the principles of social justice and public ownership of large means of production, land, forests and mineral resources; industrialization, with a focus on autarchy, including an independent financial system; creating a powerful army and fleet; demographic program (“Russian billion” goal); program for the restoration of the Russian village; moral censorship, etc.

In foreign policy, an alliance with the great Asian powers. This path showed us even Alexander Nevsky. "We are the Scythians ...", the heirs of the Scythian state, the empire of Genghis Khan and Batu, the Russian Empire and the Red Empire. This union is also possible only with the restoration of the conceptual independence of Russia. In particular, China will never respect Russia while our “elite” is guided by Western values. Beijing in this situation will use the resources of Russia, and look at the Russian Federation as a possible mining and battlefield.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    28 June 2014 07: 42
    How beautiful-
    true democracy
    What's this? And what do they eat with? Here is Ukraine gorged on "democracy" like the most I do not want. It turned out -not the people, but the power of the people.
    And the fact that "yes we are Scythians, yes we are Asians" I do not know where and how A. Nevsky said, and A. Blok said exactly (well, it is slightly different from Nevsky) smile
    1. +2
      28 June 2014 08: 10
      Soon all these maydanced govnoseks will show you a sweet gayropian life. When they are squeezed out to Galicia, they will inevitably go to feed with their sponsors But they definitely will not work anymore. And they always want to eat, and they already tried to eat blood.



      With a mouse click, it is desirable to increase. Good luck. City-Hero Slaviansku exposure.
  2. -7
    28 June 2014 07: 42
    Some kind of porridge, fat minus hi
    1. +6
      28 June 2014 12: 56
      Everything that is written about the First World War is written correctly, but it is not specified about how we were dragged into it. The British embassy invested huge sums of money in the development of anti-German sentiments and support for the "war party", many officials carried out a pro-British position for money, and after the revolution they received British awards. Hysteria was fanning mad. At that time, about 2 million Germans lived in Russia, and their eviction and pressure on them became regular. The women of that time actively molded the image of the enemy from the German and Austro-Hungarian empires in the newspapers. And for a snack the second stake was promised the Bosphorus, and the Turks wanted to participate in the war on our side, but we were already promised their straits and we shed them off, so the Turks became allies of the Germans. As Zadornov said, while the fools are fighting, the smart ones must make money. The article is a bold plus.
      1. +2
        29 June 2014 12: 08
        “... the overwhelming part of the current Russian“ elite ”, like a hundred years ago, is infected with Westernism, there is no Russian spirit in it.
        ... attempts are being made to rely on ... religious cults and formal patriotism. However, given the huge social stratification in society, ... people do not have faith in hierarchs in which there is NO Holy Spirit and “patriots” officials who have millions and billions of income.
        ... In the conditions of the domination of the liberal "elite" in Russia, Russia is doomed to defeat. "

        Each phrase accurately reveals the situation.
        IS AND DECISION:
        "... the recipes for the restoration of Russia are known: true democracy based on the principles of social justice and public ownership of large means of production, land, forests and mineral resources; industrialization, with a COURSE FOR AUTHOR'S, including an independent financial system; creation of a powerful army and navy; demographic program (goal "Russian billion"), program for the restoration of the Russian countryside, moral censorship, etc.

        In my opinion, Putin has two ways:
        - either he is one of them, the current "elite", and all his positive undertakings, no matter how correct they are, will ultimately lead to the defeat of Russia,
        - either he changes course according to these recipes, which also has a huge risk (primarily for him personally), BUT only here is a CHANCE to win.

        Author of the article BRAVO!
        I agree with g1v2, with the exception of "if the second".
        This is not the case with the Russian Tsars. We are not given to judge them.
        1. -1
          29 June 2014 22: 40
          I regard Nikolai the second as well as a hunchback or a ben — I regret that they were not blown away in their youth, I’m sure a huge number of lives would be saved. Yes, and the country would not have to be lifted from ruins. All three count aspen just right.
  3. +3
    28 June 2014 07: 45
    The Russians (the Slavs as a whole) are to blame for everything here is the leitmotif of the beginning of that war. It was just after that shot that all the hatred for the Slavs that seethed in the West broke through, and now it is boiling in full.
    1. bpyotr
      0
      28 June 2014 14: 19
      Quote: Rigla
      The Russians (the Slavs as a whole) are to blame for everything here is the leitmotif of the beginning of that war. It was just after that shot that all the hatred for the Slavs that seethed in the West broke through, and now it is boiling in full.

      And who is to blame!? They didn’t blow everyone up in due time, they would stay in France, Germany and other Bulgarians, and there they are not far from the main well-wishers. we cannot get rid of this habitual habit. Yes, Principle is the worst name.
  4. +2
    28 June 2014 07: 46
    Quote: The current Slavyansk is Sarajevo of the XNUMXst century. Just no comment! The article is neither plus nor minus. IMHO!
  5. +6
    28 June 2014 08: 13
    Not a word about the provocative role of England and the Rothschilds. As if they were not there!
    2014 was solemnly declared in Russia as the Year of the Centenary of the First World War. Anniversary is always a period of mythology triumph. Before the outbreak of the First World War, there was some progress in the world. All the most egregious political and social shortcomings in Western countries, including the then Russian Empire, were corrected through gradual evolutionary changes. In the main non-Western countries - China, Japan, Persia, the Ottoman Empire - irreversible reforms began in the spirit of Westernization. And suddenly, consider it "suddenly", there is a breakdown, throwing humanity back to the political archaic, in just two decades a hundred years of social development are canceled out. Here it was not without secret forces.
    1. 0
      28 June 2014 08: 56
      And were they? The principle - he killed the Austrian Slavophile, and then not on the first attempt (the first attempt failed, Gavril sat in a tavern, and then the duke rode back, the Rockefellers whispered). The Rothschilds, yes, but what about.
      1. bpyotr
        +1
        28 June 2014 16: 29
        Quote: tanit
        And were they? The principle - he killed the Austrian Slavophile, and then not on the first attempt (the first attempt failed, Gavril sat in a tavern, and then the duke rode back, the Rockefellers whispered). The Rothschilds, yes, but what about.

        Your skepticism is more than inappropriate
    2. +1
      29 June 2014 11: 52
      Do you remember how the USSR was falling apart. When, under far-fetched pretexts, such as an "incorrectly paid bonus" at a provincial enterprise, a nationwide "socio-political discussion" was opened, which ended with people going out into the streets to rallies against the existing system and state structure under the same far-fetched slogans.
      You must not let yourself be deceived and follow the promises of paid and bought politicians who pursue only their own profit.
  6. -5
    28 June 2014 09: 02
    If you wonder-think-and who of the Great Powers was the first to start a war with the Great? No, not Germany. Not Austria (it started at first, but Serbia was not a Great Power), Not Turkey. From the Great to fight with the Great (at that time) - the first beginning of the Russian Empire.
  7. +1
    28 June 2014 10: 33
    The problem was that Dmitrievich, Tankosich and other organizers of the Black Hand were not only Serbian patriots, but also members of Masonic lodges ... Oh, too ... And then do not believe in the theory of a world conspiracy .. And here it is. . The goal is the elimination of the four empires of Germany .. Russia, Austria-Hungary, Turkey .. as a result of elimination. the borders will change .. in the world and dictate your will .. And whoever conceived it understood that the three empires of military tension would not stand ...
    1. -1
      28 June 2014 11: 55
      The problem is yes, for Serbia. AND
      do not believe in the theory of a world conspiracy.
      So I do not believe it.
      Sincerely.
  8. +7
    28 June 2014 11: 25
    The KGB of the USSR had the ability and power to stop the liberals, but did nothing. Actually betrayed the country. The FSB of Russia has the ability to stop the liberals, but does nothing. That is, it betrays the country. So how does Gorbachev’s policy differ from Putin’s? I do not understand. I probably .
    1. 0
      28 June 2014 11: 52
      Well, what can I tell you .. Sometimes read or watch the official Russian news. And they take it alive, and not alive either.
  9. +1
    28 June 2014 13: 21
    demographic program (target "Russian billion")

    A good goal, but with a figure perhaps gone too far. For a full life, for settling in and protecting a territory of 17 million square kilometers, it is necessary and sufficient population somewhere in the region of 400 - 500 million, preferably of Russian-Slavic origin.
  10. -1
    28 June 2014 14: 58
    And here is one more victim of the injustice of the Austro-Hungarian system - a brilliant count and a successful military Sheptytsky, who was either explained to him, or maybe he himself realized that the Slavic man in this state would never receive the rank, albeit deservedly, of Field Marshal ... A man went into religion, and there he did a lot of business, and here are his words in September 1944: “I am sincerely glad that the Soviet government freed us from these Germans, and about this joy and about the obligations arising from it, spoke and I say to believers and the clergy. Not later than today I held a council of local clergy and some visitors. I have such cathedrals every Thursday. So I taught them how to be grateful and obedient to the Soviet power sent to us by God, and the clergy with sincerity perceived and accepts my teachings ”...
  11. bpyotr
    -1
    28 June 2014 16: 35
    Quote: tanit
    If you wonder-think-and who of the Great Powers was the first to start a war with the Great? No, not Germany. Not Austria (it started at first, but Serbia was not a Great Power), Not Turkey. From the Great to fight with the Great (at that time) - the first beginning of the Russian Empire.

    Well, I don’t want to dig around somewhere, please give me a specific reference
  12. +2
    28 June 2014 16: 44
    An interesting review of the historical tensor of the 1st World War and quite adequate parallels with the current time (indeed, London is the third Carthage), for which I thank the author of the article. But in the idea of ​​Russia's development, I would add a key core - this is Orthodoxy. It is impossible to build an empire without a spiritual foundation, and why not. Russia's mission is to testify to the world of Christ Jesus. Without this mission, Russia is insignificant!
  13. waggish
    0
    28 June 2014 17: 25
    The largest empire ................... then blown away after the shot!
    1. bpyotr
      -1
      28 June 2014 18: 02
      Quote: waggish
      The largest empire ................... then blown away after the shot!

      If she had understood this, she would have been blown away even before the shot!
  14. +2
    28 June 2014 22: 15
    And what kind of MIRACLE with the letter "M" walked along the branch? I set the cons ... and almost everyone ..
    1. +1
      29 June 2014 02: 27
      So nezalezhnik zhzhot !!! We swear yadu m * to rocks (and at the same time to Siberians) to give ne mozhu, so at least I bite !!!
  15. +2
    28 June 2014 23: 41
    At all times, Small Britain has played a dirty trick on Russia, even when it was an "ally."
  16. pinecone
    +1
    29 June 2014 09: 30
    President of the Republika Srpska in Bosnia, Milorad Dodik, at the unveiling of the monument to Gavrilo the Principle in Sarajevo on June 27, 2014.
  17. Neighbor from below
    0
    29 June 2014 12: 09
    Yes, World War I is an event that shows clearly how to start a war because of a dumb-headed fanatic. If it weren’t for Gavril’s Principle, everything could have been different.
  18. pinecone
    +1
    29 June 2014 12: 22
    Quote: Neighbor from below
    Yes, World War I is an event that shows clearly how to start a war because of a dumb-headed fanatic. If it weren’t for Gavril’s Principle, everything could have been different.


    Would prepare another "gavrila".
  19. +2
    29 June 2014 15: 31
    The author is right in one thing, the West is evil. It is possible that some illusions still exist in Russia about this part of the world, but it has long been clear to us who live in this West that Evil and Poison! So-called European values, it’s a sham and a lie. the help of ordinary deception into the sphere of influence of the EU, and above all the USA, the countries of the former airborne forces and the Baltic countries were pulled in, then devastation, the impoverishment of the population of these countries and the war followed. Ukraine also awaits, and what to say about the values ​​of this West after that, name at least one! They accuse us of corruption, because in Europe it just rolls over, in Russia there is supposedly a problem with human rights, so look that in Latvia, where a third of the population is limited in rights, it also happens in Estonia. Freedom of speech, as we have in Latvia for dissent shines a real five-year term !!!
  20. +2
    29 June 2014 19: 31
    "In particular, China will never respect Russia as long as our 'elite' is guided by Western values. Beijing in such a situation will use the resources of Russia, and look at the Russian Federation as a possible prey and a battlefield."

    And when the elite ceases to focus on Western values, then China, according to the author, immediately respects Russia and ceases to look at the Russian Federation as a possible prey and battlefield?
    It is interesting whether the Vietnamese (not oriented to the West) or the Japanese, with whom
    China fought a thousand years before they became acquainted with European values?
    Samsonov Alexander is a consistent Eurasian, we must give him his due. But he also needs something
    understand the basics of economics. The utopia about the ideal Russian villages and cities is attractive, but hardly feasible.
    And the path of Alexander Nevsky, who received a label from the Great Horde to collect tribute in the Russian principalities, may not appeal to people.
  21. LCA
    0
    29 June 2014 21: 57
    For serious politicians in Russia and abroad, it is obvious that liberals in Russia have completely lost any significant social base in society and they will never return to power. In this regard, the question: “What would happen if they were not allowed to steer at the time?” - In society, there would be expectations: liberals would come and then we would live like in Europe.

    Dali steered - the majority was convinced: we will not heal, if we do not learn to think with our own head, having ceased to rely on the "West". Now many proactively raise a similar question in relation to the Russian Orthodox Church. Priests, like generals, always prepare for past wars (including information ones) and therefore think in categories of the early twentieth century, when people were 85% illiterate.

    In Russia, there is a conflict between state and business authorities on the topic of which of them is the main one in this pair, i.e. who should serve whom: business - statehood, or statehood - business.

    The “elitist” regime is busy with another attempt in history to build a clan-tribal system with a hereditary-clan “elite,” and therefore it has neither an understanding of the long-term strategic goals of socio-historical development, nor a desire to understand them, much less work to implement them contrary to self-interest clans seized upon state and business power.

    Behind all the words about democracy, about law and rule of law, about civil society, about the modernization and revival of the country on the basis of innovative development, there is a strategic choice of the future option.

    Today, at the level of basic education that is still being maintained in society, entry into conceptual rule is accessible to everyone. It would be a desire and desire not in words, but in fact to change life for the better.
    The conceptual power in Russian civilization will rise to its full potential - the ideological, legislative, executive and judicial authorities will not go anywhere and will, in accordance with the full function of management, do their job in the concept of democracy in God.

    At the beginning of XXI, Russia again faces the need for a new cultural transformation, but this time more grandiose and hitherto unknown to all the peoples of the planet Earth. Its essence lies in moral transformation, which is possible provided that reasoning on the authority of traditions, scriptures and leaders gives way to a culture of feelings and thinking, which will enable each individual to become a person. And this process has begun in Russia.

    For more than twenty years, we have initiated the work of many people to develop the Concept of Public Safety, the skeletal basis of which are dialectics and the Enough General Management Theory (DOTU). Therefore, in society there should be no place for dependent moods: when will the power and government finally begin to teach in schools and universities not absurdity, but Truth - Truth? Neither the Ministry of Education, nor its numerous officials are capable of this because they are the same inhabitants.

    In Russia today, it is possible that for the first time in its history, there are objective conditions for a new cultural transformation of Russian civilization, which are not found in any country in the world. The word “transformation” in the Russian language implies not just a change in the image of any phenomenon, object, but its expression in a new image previously unknown to its essence or the implementation of previously unused or unknown capabilities and abilities. Transformation, not modernization of the country as an uncontested need.

    The process of convergence of historically famous capitalism and socialism and the construction of a unified global society, which has entered the stage of practical implementation, is the many-sided reality of the global politics of our days. The only question is, according to what concept will it end (biblical or BER)? We all decide !!!
    1. +1
      29 June 2014 22: 27
      Dear LCA, your comment is more relevant than the article itself. Respect.
  22. +1
    29 June 2014 22: 25
    What about the rockefellers? Aren't they chapels?
  23. +1
    30 June 2014 05: 29
    What are you ??? Is it really Putin, Medvedev, Chubais, Deripaska, Abramovich, Prokhorov, Shoigu, etc. etc. will restore socialism??