Ground Bomb GLSDB: Affordable Offensive Weapons

72
Ground Bomb GLSDB: Affordable Offensive Weapons


The combination of a ground-to-ground missile tested in combat with existing air-to-ground weapons can significantly add to the current US military’s arsenal of shock capabilities at a low cost and with less risk. This idea led Boeing to develop a small caliber bomb launched from the ground (GLSDB) (Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb). This system will allow the US Army and possibly other Allied armies that are equipped with the MLRS rocket launcher (MLRS) to achieve targets at large distances (more than 150 km) with the accuracy provided by the standard SDB bomb. In accordance with the ban on cluster armament, the US Army began dismantling its M26 missiles. Their combat units are stuffed with 644 grenades M77 (anti-personnel / to defeat the material part), which are scattered over the target in the air, which is now outside the law. The rocket itself has a range of 32 km and thus can be used to launch something else. Instead of destroying them, Boeing began developing an interstage adapter that allows you to connect the SDB and the rocket. When it reaches a given fire control system, the adapter separates the SDB from the rocket and, thanks to its folding wings, the bomb plans to the target using its inertial navigation / GPS system. The high-explosive warhead of the piercing action weighs 93 kg, it is distinguished by a profiled nose, contains 16 kg of a low-sensitivity explosive and is equipped with an electronic fuse with selectable before deactivation modes: air detonation, non-contact and delayed. The bomb can be used in underground structures, since the penetration of the warhead into the reinforced concrete reaches almost one meter. GLSDB is compatible with the M270A1 MLRS MLRS and M142 HIMARS, each container holds six missiles, i.e., caterpillar 12 missiles and six light wheeled missiles. After completing the development of the interstage adapter, Boeing must conduct ground and flight tests.



Materials used:
Armada International
www.boeing.com
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    26 June 2014 09: 11
    An interesting solution. good Previously, they used air-to-air missiles for ground-based air defense, now air-to-ground missiles have been converted into surface-to-surface missiles. It's cheaper, more versatile, and more deadly this way.
    1. -1
      26 June 2014 09: 20
      Quote: professor
      Ground Bomb GLSDB: Affordable Offensive Weapons

      of such ... containers with GLSDB, and I. Strelkov to Slavyansk !!!

      a very effective weapon will turn out, 3-th generation-shot and forgot !!!
      You can mix on any truck, you just need the modularity of the containers themselves !!!
      1. -11
        26 June 2014 09: 28
        Quote: cosmos111
        of such ... containers with GLSDB, and I. Strelkov to Slavyansk !!!

        Terrorists cannot afford such weapons. It is just intended against them. Here precise target designation from a satellite or drone is required. Maybe the "opolchentsev" already have satellites? wink


        1. +9
          26 June 2014 09: 55
          Quote: professor
          such a weapon is not for the corman

          Can not afford it for sure.
          Quote: professor
          To terrorists such a weapon

          And about terrorism, you can argue. So, terrorists can be called in modern terms both Israelis after WWII, and citizens of the American colonies during the struggle for independence. I hope you do not deny the terrorist component of the newly formed states such as Kosovo, the new Sudan?
          1. -15
            26 June 2014 10: 08
            Quote: SPLV
            And about terrorism, you can argue. So, terrorists can be called in modern terms and the Israelis after WWII

            No you can not. They didn’t hide behind women and children, they fought exclusively against foreign occupation authorities ...
            1. +3
              26 June 2014 10: 31
              Quote: professor
              No you can not. They didn’t hide behind women and children,


              proff ... do not distort the facts-PUPPERS defend their cities from the Nazis, what the citizens of the USSR did in World War II ((((INCLUDING AND JEWS))))) !!!
              1. -21
                26 June 2014 10: 41
                No need, now I'll pay and start uploading photos and videos. Especially how the Russians in the form of Igor Strelkov and the Chechens "DEFEND ITS CITIES FROM Fascists. "Let's leave the decorate for the corresponding branches.
                1. +2
                  26 June 2014 11: 11
                  Quote: professor
                  Let's leave decorate for the corresponding branches

                  OK...
                2. Perch_xnumx
                  +1
                  26 June 2014 15: 40
                  CIA agents, PMCs, FBI agents, military advisers are now native Ukrainians. Zmagayuzza for his independent and unified land, fiery American lads. There was a whole zoo of foreign mercenaries on the Maidan. Until now, the investigation is at a dead end. Who shot in the back of the rams on the Maidan from the Ukraine hotel, which was controlled by the Maidan. In such a dead end that they even cut down all the trees with traces of shots.
                  So who are the terrorists? It’s nothing like the militants of Bandera e ... Jews during the Lviv pogrom. It’s nothing that the Jews were persecuted and killed along with the Poles and Russians.
                  Do you call yourself a Jew? You did not see the Holocaust and concentration camps, you did not smell the gas in the cells. From that they are so arrogant and deceitful.
                  The same American lads worked in Syria, most of the foreigners were field commanders of the militants in Syria. In Libya, Western special forces worked against Gaddafi, western planes provided a no-fly zone with air-to-ground missiles and bombs. Gaddafi's warriors knew how to fly like genies?
                  In Syria, the Islamists are fighting all over the place in the settlements.
                  They are terrorists according to the habadnik professor. What was the professor silent before? And even the moderate Syrian Sunnis are terrorists, because they are fighting in their neighborhoods. But they would go out into the open field and there they would cover them all with one gulp.
            2. +3
              26 June 2014 10: 32
              Quote: professor
              Behind the backs of women and children did not hide

              As I understand it, in the Middle East, then of all future citizens of the state of Israel there were exclusively males aged from 18 to 45?
              I accept the patriotism of everyone, if this does not happen with the infringement of others. By the way, what about Kosovo, Sudan, and all the states of the American continent? (We will omit other European, as well as African, Asian examples) For the sake of brevity, is the exception only the state of Israel?
              fought exclusively against foreign occupation authorities ...

              Moreover, the national heroes of that time are known to many. And who knows the heroes of Israel until the 19 century? Perhaps no one except historians, since they were considered terrorists, not heroes. That is, until you win - you are a terrorist, and after the victory - a fighter for independence.
            3. Voronbit
              +1
              26 June 2014 12: 41
              terrorists, those who are fighting against their own population and shoot at the homes and hospitals of their fellow citizens can tell. that it is the militias. and not the Nazis under the flag of Kiev
              1. 0
                27 June 2014 04: 46
                Quote: Voronbit
                terrorists are those who fight against their population and shoot at the homes and hospitals of their fellow citizens

                According to your definition, Khattab was not a terrorist?
                1. Voronbit
                  0
                  27 June 2014 14: 55
                  according to my definition, Khattab. once was the leader of terrorists
            4. artefom
              +2
              26 June 2014 22: 19
              On this topic, you can throw evidence and refutations for a long time. In my opinion, the words of the prophet Moses from the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible speaks most vividly about the methods of the Jews' struggle against the "occupiers" of the promised land: them Moses: [why] you left all women alive? 14 Here they, according to the advice of Balaam, were for the children of Israel an excuse for apostasy from the Lord to please Fegor, for which the defeat was in the company of the Lord; 15 So kill all the male children, and kill all the women who know a husband on a male bed. 16 But all the female children who have not known the male bed, keep alive for yourself; " (Numbers, chapter 17).
        2. +1
          26 June 2014 10: 26
          Quote: professor
          about a satellite or drone. Maybe the "militias" already have satellites


          Russia has satellites, and drones (UAVs), according to the information, militias have ...

          but, and the cost ... there will always be sympathetic patrons !!!
        3. +1
          26 June 2014 11: 53
          ... Maybe the "volunteers" already have satellites?
          -
          Well, they say that the drone is already there
        4. 0
          26 June 2014 14: 56
          Well, in general, not a bad tractor, only this is what kind of payload it can carry while maintaining such as demonstrated cross-country ability.
        5. Perch_xnumx
          0
          26 June 2014 15: 17
          Quote: professor

          Terrorists do not like such weapons.

          Stab the Chabadnik to your Chabad and preach there. People in a referendum have spoken, millions of people. Militias are representatives of these millions. Rebels, combatants.
          Terrorists are those who shot civilians in Mariupol, the police who refused to use weapons against civilians, those who burned people alive in Odessa, those who shot the commission in the New Idar.
          Terrorists are those who shot hospitals and churches, those who shot the water supply in the Donbass, those who shot the pumping station, those who shot the wounded in the hospital of the Red Estuary.
          Is it in the hospital that they were hiding peacefully, or in a kindergarten, or in a church?
          You will tell us about terrorists !! Chabadnik .....
          The West has stuffed Syrian terrorists with the weapons to the eyeballs, the most vile scum of the igil and annusra. And nothing combatants, rebels and fighters for democracy. And schools are blowing up with children and nothing is terrorists.
          Thank God that the Russians are not Western scum and do not teach Hezbollah, for example, cheap and effective solutions so that the Chabad people finally wash away with their "terrorism."
          1. -3
            26 June 2014 15: 31
            Drink some water and calm down, otherwise the heart attack is enough. wassat
            1. Perch_xnumx
              0
              26 June 2014 15: 50
              Thank God that a lot of normal people live in Israel, otherwise you could apply a Western democratic method to your brother with a clear conscience.
              All in the hands of God, the professor does not worry. Better think about what he told you. How your children and grandchildren will pay for everything that you have brought to life with your own hands.
              The time is near.
        6. Cpa
          +2
          26 June 2014 21: 41
          Quote: professor
          Terrorists do not like such weapons.

          But what about the Islamists' "cornets" in Iraq?
    2. IFreedman
      0
      28 June 2014 23: 37
      Quote: professor
      add to the current military arsenal of the american army drums opportunities for small cost and with smaller risk

      Instead of destroying them Boeing begins development of interstage adapter

      That's why I love America! good
  2. -1
    26 June 2014 09: 43
    militiamen of the DPR and LPR drones have already appeared as I understand it, like we have already presented this installation in the container and there are videos from the container ship from the container ship missiles of the club fly out of the car container and destroy the enemy
    1. +1
      26 June 2014 09: 48
      Quote: bmv04636
      militia DNI and LC have drones already appeared

      I wonder where (rhetorical question)?

      as I understand it, we have already presented this installation in a container, and there’s a video of a club type missile flying from a container ship from a container ship and destroying the enemy

      This complex and Club is a virgin completely different things. By the way, the use of Klab from civilian platforms is contrary to the Geneva Conventions.
      This complex is intended to replace front-line aviation. Instead of calling a plane, it’s faster and much cheaper to use this device from the frontline. In the end, the bomb doesn’t matter who dropped it, an airplane or a rocket.
      1. +1
        26 June 2014 10: 02
        they say from St. Petersburg good uncles set and how the club differs from this device is not clear
        1. +2
          26 June 2014 10: 06
          Quote: bmv04636
          how the club differs from this device is not clear

          "Club" is a classic rocket launched from a launcher disguised into a civilian carrier. This system is a gliding bomb that does not need an airplane ...
          1. 0
            26 June 2014 10: 14
            as I understand it, the air-to-ground rocket (cruise missile) connected the air-to-air acceleration module from the rocket and got the point At where it’s cheap and, as I understand, got the type of how our coastal complex Bastion has only a smaller radius of action
          2. 0
            26 June 2014 10: 41
            Quote: professor

            "Club" is a classic missile launched from a launcher disguised into a civilian carrier


            make a smaller caliber rocket bomb, and also mask in the container ...

            yes, if the starting engine is working at the start, this by definition cannot be a bomb ...
            for the "CLUB-K" complex, you need an ultra-small rocket with a vertical launch, weighing about 100-159 kg ...
            1. +1
              26 June 2014 10: 45
              Quote: cosmos111
              make a smaller caliber rocket bomb, and also mask in the container ...

              Nizya, Zhnevskaya convention does not allow "masking in a container".

              yes, if the starting engine is working at the start, this by definition cannot be a bomb ...

              These definitions have long been vague. 150 km flying like a bomb? So the bomb.
              1. +1
                26 June 2014 10: 56
                But what about the BZHRK in Rodi, we again plan to produce it and put it on duty
                1. +1
                  26 June 2014 11: 02
                  And there are problems with the convention. Oh, and this convention is not convenient when it restricts you ... For example, a silent machine gun The shaft is prohibited by this convention since firearms must be noisy, give themselves away and give a chance to the enemy.
                  1. 0
                    26 June 2014 11: 17
                    Quote: professor
                    And there are problems with the convention.


                    you need an installation of the "TOR" type of air defense missile system with a vertical start, on the main gun and wheeled chassis ...
                    1. +1
                      26 June 2014 11: 18
                      Than army !!! is a container truck bad?
                  2. 0
                    26 June 2014 12: 45
                    and at the same time it is used in full and a silent 2B25 Gall mortar is delivered
                    1. 0
                      26 June 2014 13: 40
                      Quote: bmv04636
                      and at the same time it is used in full and a silent 2B25 Gall mortar is delivered

                      I can give you many examples of violation of the convention, does this mean that it must be deliberately violated or canceled?
                      1. 0
                        26 June 2014 13: 48
                        the question is, we signed and ratified it, and if possible, the name and title
                      2. +1
                        26 June 2014 14: 11
                        Quote: bmv04636
                        the question is, we signed and ratified it, and if possible, the name and title

                        Offhand here: http://www.un.org/en/humanitarian/law/geneva.shtml
                  3. 0
                    26 June 2014 13: 54
                    here you are not right from the START II treaty we left and, in principle, we can build and use the BZHRK with a rocket like YaRS it is not forbidden
              2. +2
                26 June 2014 12: 14
                Which bomb?

                This is a MLRS with a planning warhead, do not pull on the globe.

                Judging by the logic of Prohesor, the Warhead of the Voivode is also a bomb.
                1. +2
                  26 June 2014 13: 45
                  Quote: Evgeny_Lev
                  Judging by the logic of Prohesor, the Warhead of the Voivode is also a bomb.

                  Young man, learn to spell my nickname correctly and then maybe I'll discuss with you. In the meantime, learn materiel and spelling.
  3. 0
    26 June 2014 10: 45
    About a year ago there was an article on VO, something similar was created in Ukraine, only the device was intended for ambush actions.
    1. +2
      26 June 2014 13: 02
      another topic ... tactical missile launcher NLOS-LS - makes it possible to hit targets at 40 km from closed firing positions, tanks, fortifications ...
      launch containers with missiles are combined into a single unit and are not tied to the carrier, they are delivered to their destination by any transport, motor vehicle, boat, etc.
      complex dimensions 114х114х175 weight 1,5 tons ....



      missiles of the first type PAM (Precision Attack Missiles) are high-precision ammunition that is sent to the target using the satellite navigation system GPS or its own inertial navigation system (Inertial Navigation System - INS). In the final section, several homing modes are provided


      Missiles of the second type LAM (Loitering Attack Missiles) are also displayed in a given area using the GPS / INS system. They fly over the battlefield in search of a target, and then, upon discovering the target, destroy it upon command from the ground. They can conduct reconnaissance, aerial photography, target designation and keep in touch, that is, until target designation they perform a flight over the battlefield as shock UAVs.



      here from here: http: //technicamolodezhi.ru/rubriki_tm/voennyie_znaniya/raketa_v_ya
      schike
  4. -1
    26 June 2014 11: 00
    I like this approach. They made a universal launcher eleven years ago and now they put everything in it that they can think of or bungle from anything. We have all the installations narrowly specialized and you can't shoot from a hail of missiles from a hurricane.
  5. 0
    26 June 2014 11: 36
    The bomb itself looks like a hunting arrowhead for a bow.
  6. +3
    26 June 2014 11: 36
    It was high time to remake this stupid NUR MLRS system
    for other ammunition - concrete.
    It is amazing that in Israel they did not think of this.
    Israel bought them and they were absolutely useless.
    They shot at Lebanon in 2006. The militants sat deep
    in the bunkers. All ammunition was released idle.
    1. +1
      26 June 2014 11: 54
      walking is not new ... this is a continuation of the topic: SDB (Small Diameter Bomb) planning bomb ...
      and according to the performance characteristics, they are almost identical: weight about 100 kg ... diameter 20 cm ... length about 2 met ... planning range 100 cells ...


      the main idea, GLSDB: to make its use cheaper than SDB (one plane departure is several times more expensive))) of its ground launch ....
      judging by the photo of the GL-SDB, the launch comes from an installation of the "MLRS MLRS" type ..
      1. +3
        26 June 2014 14: 48
        I say: it’s time to remake MLRS missiles from NUR to UR.
        Because both high-explosive and cluster versions of missiles are ineffective.
        They are for hitting a square on the clusters of the enemy. With this
        and ordinary howitzers with a shell for the price of $ 150 cope.
        And it’s a pity to launch a missile 7.5 m long with a 300 kg warhead.
  7. Alexander.B
    +1
    26 June 2014 12: 11
    Something in my opinion, a bomb is an uncontrolled means of hitting a free fall. Dropped - fell, banged. And here the rocket is like a rocket, they just changed the stuffing.

    Now, if they made a flight to a certain point with the subsequent firing of the rocket engine stages, then this would really be a smart, relatively cheap (?) And maneuverable means of destruction - a ground-to-ground bomb.

    And the heavy nose with the fuse itself will roll down, especially since it is not difficult for the designers to foresee a forward bomb toss, which will slow down.

    Or even the bow will carry a charge, and the fuse will be in the middle of the ammunition and when the steps come off, the firing pin will be right below.

    In short, well done, I'm a dreamer)))
    1. +1
      26 June 2014 13: 14
      Quote: Alexander.B
      it is an uncontrollable means of defeating the free pade


      This is more a rocket from the MLRS "Smerch" cal 300 mm: at a distance of 70 km, for operational reconnaissance of targets and clarification of weather conditions in the target area, a 9M534 rocket with a T-90 UAV is used ... loitering time 20-30 minutes ...

      equip 9M534 with T-90 with warhead will be a modern high-precision weapon, 3-th generation ... shot and forgot !!!
  8. +1
    26 June 2014 12: 47
    I understand that at the planning stage, this planned bomb can be intercepted by the zoo
    1. +1
      26 June 2014 13: 58
      Quote: bmv04636
      I understand that at the planning stage, this planned bomb can be intercepted by the zoo

      The "zoo" is not intended for such purposes, Thor must cope with this, Shell ...
      1. 0
        26 June 2014 17: 13
        Most likely he had in mind the detection and calculation of the fall path, respectively, and the launch point.
        1. +2
          26 June 2014 20: 44
          Quote: gray
          Most likely he had in mind the detection and calculation of the fall path, respectively, and the launch point.

          And here by. Planning ammunition does not fly along a ballistic trajectory and calculating the place of impact is not possible ...
  9. 0
    26 June 2014 13: 05
    Quote: cosmos111
    judging by the photo of the GL-SDB, the launch comes from an installation of the "MLRS MLRS" type ..

    This is just a picture. Although it has a more likely appearance than the picture from the article. With such aerodynamics, the launch will not be predictable.
    1. 0
      26 June 2014 14: 00
      Quote: Denimax
      I eat a picture from an article


      no, not from the article, in the article the GLSDB rocket-bomb: still with a fairing ((, but THAT I posted a Fairing NO !!!

      and it will be launched from the block container, as in the NLOS-LS installation ... read above ...

      here is another one, ((to the heap)))) lol ... missile system: Israeli Jumper "Jumper" ", has similar performance characteristics with the American NLOS-LS ....

  10. 0
    26 June 2014 14: 14
    Quote: cosmos111
    but THAT I posted a COGNITION NO !!!

    Your second picture in one post with a fairing. About her and speech.
    In general, this is only a project. Many technical problems have yet to be resolved. MLRS rocket for stabilization requires rotation. A planning warhead is desirable to have a horizontal position for the dissolution of the wings and continue the flight.
    1. +2
      26 June 2014 15: 12
      Quote: Denimax
      Your second picture in one post with a fairing

      in short, I myself am confused, in my post with a fairing ....

      but that’s not the point, after starting from MLRS, GLSDВ, it gains altitude and a predetermined path, the engine turns off, wings open and the ammunition starts free planning .... after reaching the target, vertical diving .... BACH and EVERYTHING lol !!!
      there was a tank .. no tank (bunker) or tank in the bunker ...
      1. +2
        26 June 2014 15: 45
        if the tank is standing and if moving how
        1. +2
          26 June 2014 16: 58
          Then you need to choose another weapon - this does not fit.
  11. +2
    26 June 2014 21: 28
    Quote: professor
    For example, a silent machine gun Shaft is prohibited by this convention since firearms must be noisy, give themselves away and give a chance to the enemy.

    What nonsense. Weapons are always being improved so that the enemy does not give any chances.
    Mufflers are not massively used only because the ballistics of weapons are getting worse and more difficult to operate.
    1. +1
      26 June 2014 22: 34
      Quote: Denimax
      What nonsense.

      Rave? Have you read the convention?

      Quote: Denimax
      Weapons are always improved so as not to give the enemy no chance.

      Also, plastic mines are prohibited, as plastic fragments are not detected in the body of the wounded by x-rays and do not leave him. "no chance"Continuing the list? Crossbows ...
  12. 0
    26 June 2014 22: 55
    Quote: professor
    Have you read the convention?

    Do not read. I am more a techie than a humanist.
    Quote: professor
    Also, plastic mines are banned, since plastic fragments are not detected in the body of the wounded by x-rays and do not leave him "no chance".

    And what is this news? Many countries have mines in service with a plastic case. As I know, they want to ban anti-personnel mines (though not everyone agrees). Since after the war they make themselves felt for a long time. But it seems that they are already obligatorily equipped with self-liquidator.
    Well now let's talk about Crossbows ....
    1. +1
      26 June 2014 22: 58
      Quote: Denimax
      And what is this news? Many countries have mines in service with a plastic case. As I know, they want to ban anti-personnel mines (though not everyone agrees). Since after the war they make themselves felt for a long time. But it seems that they are already obligatorily equipped with self-liquidator.

      Do you want to argue with the convention? And I? request

      Quote: Denimax
      Well now let's talk about Crossbows ....

      Banned as a silent weapon ...
  13. 0
    26 June 2014 23: 08
    Quote: professor
    Banned as a silent weapon ...

    You may not believe it, but the main reason is that now it’s not even anyone's mind to fight the Crossbow.
  14. 0
    27 June 2014 05: 07
    And how is it in the convention, at the expense of any pullers from around the corner?
    1. 0
      27 June 2014 07: 49
      Quote: Bayonet
      And how is it in the convention, at the expense of any pullers from around the corner?

      I re-read, it seems that they do not fall under the ban.
      1. 0
        27 June 2014 13: 27
        Well, now all the special forces in Europe and AI urgently need to throw out all weapons with silencers
  15. 0
    27 June 2014 16: 57
    Quote: professor
    "Club" is a classic rocket launched from a launcher disguised into a civilian carrier. This system is a gliding bomb that does not need an airplane ...

    Those. Do you consider the army of the USA, China, Iran, Israel, etc. violators of the Geneva Convention only on the basis that they transport and store weapons (as one example, missile launchers for shipment to Afghanistan, Iraq) in civilian containers? I do not agree with you !!!
    A good example: the Minuteman-I shipping container looks like a civilian refrigerator.
    1. 0
      27 June 2014 18: 00
      Quote: goose
      Those. Do you consider the army of the USA, China, Iran, Israel, etc. violators of the Geneva Convention only on the basis that they transport and store weapons (as one example, missile launchers for shipment to Afghanistan, Iraq) in civilian containers? I do not agree with you !!!

      To store and transport this one (by the way, the cargo is declared during transportation if you are not in the know), but to use a civilian type ... this is not according to the rules. It's all the same if an armored train is "disguised" as an ambulance.
      1. 0
        27 June 2014 22: 28
        but what about the Second World War when warships disguised as transporters for catching German submarines are from the past and from today when PMCs are equipping transporters to pass the Strait of Aden and what prevents us from saying that the opposite side is terrorists and, as I understand it, the conventions do not apply to them
    2. Voronbit
      0
      28 June 2014 05: 27
      damn .... what are you saying .... attached to the planning not very accurate expensive bomb missile stage ... in principle, a fairly trivial engineering task and talk here is nothing
      1. 0
        28 June 2014 08: 36
        Quote: Voronbit
        damn .... what do you say .... attached to the planning not very accurate expensive rocket missile stage ... in principle, a rather trivial engineering task and talk here is nothing

        You definitely shouldn't have said.
  16. 0
    4 January 2019 00: 48
    A wonderful weapon ... a pity that it is directed against us. Overwhelm the leading edge with this trifle ... and how to bring them all down? The conclusion suggests itself, it is necessary on the basis of Igla MANPADS, etc. to develop instead of WGSN a new GOS, probably RL ... Sew them into 4 container blocks and, as an option, hang them on everything that drives. Or create a multi-barreled like RZSO Grada and ....