Why did the Third Reich not finish the foggy Albion?

One of the big questions of the Second World War is the topic: why did not Hitler finish off the British Empire, although there were all the possibilities for this. The first time the British were "spared" in Dunkirk, although they could defeat their corps, destroy or take prisoner, but were allowed to evacuate. Hitler stopped the advance of the motorized and tank divisions, they were brought to the second line, allowing the British to create a defense, and then to take out their expeditionary force. In fact, Hitler made a gesture of "goodwill", if the British were destroyed, it would be more difficult to make peace.

This was followed by preparations for the invasion of the island itself: on July 16, 1940, Hitler issued a directive on the invasion of England ("Directive No. 16: On the preparation of an airborne operation against England"), and in September of the same year, the Reich Air Force launched massive bombardments of English cities. Berlin could inflict powerful blows on the most important strategic routes of the British Empire - it depended on the supply of food, raw materials for industry from its colonies. After the successful Cretan landing operation - Operation Mercury, the Wehrmacht could capture Gibraltar, carry out an operation to capture Egypt and Suez, moreover, not with one corps of Rommel, but with more significant forces. After that, it was possible to develop an attack on Persia and then India, since there was considerable anti-British potential in those regions, many would have met the Germans as liberators. Blocking the island with underwater fleetsurface cruising operations, aviation, it was not necessary to conduct an amphibious operation against him, they could just wait until London, under the constant bombing, cut off and lost a significant part of its colonial empire, himself asked for peace under the conditions of Berlin.

That is, Hitler had every opportunity to break all resistance in Europe, brilliantly completing the unification of Europe under the auspices of Germany. And after that, relying on the fleet of Great Britain, the resources of its colonies, it was possible to take the next steps on the way to the “world reich”. But instead, he begins an adventure with an attack on the USSR, having fallen into a situation of war, so unloved by the Germans, on two fronts. Why? Where is the logic?

And the answer is that the “Third Reich” project, in fact, was “born” by the Anglo-Saxons, they sponsored and supported it from the 20-ies up to the middle of World War II, and a number of American corporations until the very end of the war. London for centuries led a policy of "divide and conquer", pushing its European competitors between themselves. So, in the 19 century, Russia was confronted with France, then Napoleon was pushed to the East, with the help of Russia they finished off France’s dreams of European leadership - foreign campaigns of the Russian army that we do not need. Then, a coalition of the strongest European powers was created against Russia, unleashing the so-called. Crimean War, etc. So here, with the help of Hitler, defeated France, again unnecessarily strengthened after the First World War, and pushed their demoniac puppet against the main geopolitical opponent on the planet - Russian civilization, which unexpectedly quickly revived after the 1917 catastrophe of the year.

Even after the so-called. The “Munich Agreement” between Berlin and London concluded a non-aggression pact and a peaceful settlement of controversial issues between the Third Reich and Great Britain - September 30, 1938. For some reason, the “Chamberlain and Hitler pact” does not scream at all angles, like the Ribbentrop and Molotov pact. They can explain the reluctance of Hitler to finish off England, in it he saw an example of his world order, which Britain had been creating for centuries. Hitler gave England "signals" that he was ready for joint domination over the planet of the race of the "Germans", to which the Anglo-Saxons also belonged. And London played along with him, they gave Poland away, even France was not defended with all possible might. Hitler was supposed to crush the USSR, and then the real Players would have already determined what to do next - perhaps the new conspiracy of the military would bring a more controlled figure to power, and then Hitler would go into the taste of power, becoming less and less controlled.

The preparation for the Sea Lion landing operation and the bombing of England (the so-called Battle of Britain), which followed the rout of France, actually became a covering operation to prepare for an attack on the USSR, a performance in which ordinary people died. The last attempt by Hitler to come to terms with London was the flight of Rudolf Hess. Apparently, to achieve an agreement on a joint strike failed, but Berlin received assurances that England will remain on the sidelines. There is a high probability that Hess flew to England more than once, but when he was arrested, he just got lost, as a result, the information got into the press and had to be detained. Therefore, he was kept in custody, they were killed there when the possibility of his release appeared. The classification of the “Hess case” materials and its negotiations with London is connected with this.

So in the end it happened, officially London and Moscow became allies only on 26 in May of 1942, when it finally became clear that the USSR did not succeed quickly, a protracted war was coming, in which the USSR had more chances to win. Then you can "rebuild" Europe in the camp of "winners". Therefore, we must clearly understand that the main instigators of the war are not Hitler and his comrades-in-arms, they are only a “tool”, but London and Washington.

Sources of:
Old Men N. Who made Hitler attack Stalin. SPb., 2009.
http://www.km.ru/front-projects/krestovyi-pokhod-zapada-protiv-rossii/amerikanskaya-krov-v-finansovykh-zhilakh-treteg
http://militera.lib.ru/h/taylor/index.html

Comments

[Prophet]

And Starikov continues to carry his missionary pseudo-historical chuhn :))) A rare case of a blind man, but who does not suspect this. And on the topic - the British and the French certainly played the Hitler card. But besides them there was still a player, why to ignore and keep silent is not clear. And about the fact that the Anglo-Saxons created Hitler, well, according to this logic, Kaiser Germany created Lenin (and there’s a dime a lot of direct evidence), or the Zhidomassons, given that Parvus was not only an agent of influence of the German General Staff, but also had rich Jewish friends.

[datur]

Prophet, what is written in the article has long been known to everyone.

[mitrich]

There are several points that I can not agree with:
Firstly, on the situation with Dunkirk. The point here is not Hitler’s particular desire to save the English EC, but that he, in fact, was afraid of his successes. Manstein described it well in his memoirs. The tank breakthroughs were so deep and the communications so stretched that the Führer considered that the Allies could hit the German flanking groups. Overestimated the enemy. Therefore, he ordered the offensive to be suspended until the infantry was pulled. This made it possible for the British and parts of the French to evacuate. He did not even think about saving the British.
Secondly, of course, the British contributed to Hitler's rise to power, but not directly, but indirectly. Just the reparations imposed on Germany after the First World War were so severe + the global economic crisis exacerbated the situation that such a populist simply could not help but come to power. Which is what happened.
Further, the author, in developing his theory, suggests that after the defeat of the USSR, Hitler would have been removed from power or removed. But there were so many attempts and conspiracies against him that one brief description of them made up a whole volume, and nothing remained alive, only he began to raise his hand in greetings less, he held more on eggs. I think that if Hitler had managed to defeat the Soviet Union, then he would have "devoured" England like a Russian dumplings, no questions asked.
What I agree with is that behind-the-scenes negotiations were underway, as well as with the time of the outbreak of World War II. Why is it considered to be the time of its beginning on September 01.09.1939, XNUMX? Indeed, before that, Austria and Czechoslovakia had already been captured, without blood, but still captured.
Hitler stopped flirting with England on 10.05.1940/XNUMX/XNUMX, after the invasion of Belgium and Holland, and after the start of the bombing of London, there was no talk of peace.

[Mansds]

The direction of the company Stone-Group is the extraction, processing, and sale of natural stone. All products offered by our company are of high quality and meet European standards. In the assortment of our company there is a large selection of natural stone, for example, such pure pebbles. Pebbles are rock fragments rounded by water or sea waves (they are rounded in more detail (only stone is more detailed about such material). Natural pebbles are widely used in landscape design. From through it you can fill paths and paths in the garden, arrange aquariums (information about the part where pebbles are still used).

Our site: http://stroimhous.ru/

[Alex]

I haven’t come across a more mediocre article on this topic. The fact that England has always raked in heat with someone else's hands is by no means news under the moon. And feeding and inciting Hitler is also not a binomial of Newton. But just don't turn Adolf Aloizievich into such a weak-willed executor of someone else's will in the manner of the current leaders of some banana republics. He had a clear goal, which he clearly and distinctly stated in "Mein Kampf", and he achieved it with enviable persistence. The fact that England (together with France) did not manage to keep their dog on a leash, just indicates that Hitler was pursuing a completely independent policy.
The fact that the "Hitler-Chamberlain pact" stopped him from landing on the island looks very controversial. A similar agreement with the USSR did not bother him at all. The less plausible is this aspect: Hitler was afraid of a stab in the back from Stalin and, considering England rather weakened, decided to deal with the USSR with lightning speed, and then finish off England, which was left alone. It seems that this scenario is much more realistic (although I did not serve in the OKW and I don’t know what Hitler really thought) than the stories that the "Battle of England" is a disguise for an attack on the USSR.

[Head Physician]

the answer is that the Third Reich project actually “gave birth” to the Anglo-Saxons, they sponsored and supported it

How everything turns out to be simple