Perception algorithm
What is analysis? Decomposition, dismemberment - the method of research. Surprisingly, it is not at all necessary to have a human mind, in order to have the ability to analyze, you can never have any brains, even electronic ones. The simplest example is a sieve in a crushed stone combine, where during the crushing of rock passing through a series of sieves with cells of different sizes, we get the separation of crushed stone into different fractions, from small to large, for various production needs. And it turns out that any physical law can be interpreted as a splitting of information, and therefore, as an inalienable property, sorry for nudistics, matter.
In nature, the principle of sieves is used to the full, only instead of cells where suitable pieces of limestone fall into size, thousands, if not millions of sensors, of nerve endings reacting to a certain light wave, heat, taste or smell are used.
How is the algorithm drawn? One of the first icons means data entry, programmers work with already shared information, which is why it goes further down one dash, in the case of wildlife, this is impossible, on the contrary, we have thousands of these entries. That is why we can sense, see, be aware of, and the machine can only count. There is one more feature here: if the signal from each receptor directly comes to the brain, it will “go crazy”, therefore the collection of information from nerve endings, sensors is structured according to certain bundles, gathering in nerve nodes that play the role of routers, filters, passing Further, only the necessary information at the moment. That is, the number of inputs and receptor sensors may differ from each other by several orders of magnitude, thus realizing the principle of sieves in a new quality. And the principle of separation of information processing is the key, and here begins the expanse for biological evolution and the architects of artificial intelligence, it turns out that in order to be smart and successful in its field, it is not necessary to have exactly the largest and most perfect brain or CPU . The main thing is that the system is balanced and consistent with the challenges it faces. An example of this in nature is the organization of complex communities among insects, the same ants, bees.
In electronics, this was confirmed by the results of the confrontation between the Soviet and American engineering schools. With the lag of the elemental base and computing power, Russian scientists committed to minimalism and simplicity were forced to follow the principle of information sharing for unloading central computers, sometimes using ordinary electromechanical relays, or even thyristors, as a router to the data processing circuit. Nevertheless, and perhaps due to the fact, phenomenal results were achieved in the creation of rocket systems, air defense systems, or the Basalt P-500 product.
A rather well-known fact: on November 15, 1988, the Buran spacecraft made an automatic landing at the Yubileiny airfield, which the American space shuttles were not capable of. But let's continue the associative series - in September 1991, a K-50 combat helicopter, nicknamed the "Black Shark", was demonstrated at the Farnborough Air Show. One of the features of his autopilot was that when a person died or was unable to control the machine, he independently returned and landed the bird on the base. And how all this contrasts with the following event: in November 2010, an F-22 fighter jet piloted by Jeffrey Haney crashed in Alaska. According to the commission of inquiry, which was headed by retired General Gregory Martin, the cause of the disaster was the malfunctioning of the OBOGS (on-board oxygen generation system), which caused Haney to experience suffocation. At the same time, the deceased pilot was blamed for the disaster (!!!). That is, an incredibly expensive aircraft with miracle electronics, in a country that has begun mass production of combat drones, turned out to be unable to do things that Soviet engineers implemented 20-25 years ago ?! Correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I'm suddenly slandering American exceptionalism.
There is such a joke. In the insane asylum they decided to determine which patient to prepare for discharge and asked a test question:
- How much is one hundred plus one?
And three patients consistently answer, the first one is “Green”, the second one is “Salty”, and the third one says - “It will be two hundred”.
The delighted doctor asks the last patient, how did he do this? He never for a second, without hesitation, replies: "And he divided the green into the salty."
It's funny, but our brain does just that, using figurative pictures broken down by time. A direct consequence of the principle of sharing information of our perception is precisely the fact that it is more difficult to work with objects of formal logic, the same figures, than with visual (sound in case of blindness) images and sensations. The green color for us is green, and the abstract number (secondary symbol) can have a complex encoding and, very possibly, with the division into “salty”. One of the main miracles that people brought to this world was the ability to change their perceptions within certain limits when a person, purposefully engaged in a certain activity, develops the ability to see things beyond the usual boundaries. It has many names - a professional sense, insight as a response before its rationale, spiritual experience, intuition.
Errors of perception
And everything would be fine, but trouble came, from where it was not expected. Who would have thought? The book, which has done so much to preserve, enhance, and generalize knowledge, has caused stagnation of modern science. Now it has become apparent even when processing the results in exact disciplines. Written language as a symbol of scholasticism, coupled with the existing unification of education with the coaching of objects of formal logic has become a brake on development. It seemed that by using paper as an intermediary, people gained an advantage by concentrating on the object in presenting their thoughts, but it turned out that other non-linguistic information chains were cut off. Time after time, emascuating the concepts, it seemed, for the convenience of operating them, as a result, people began to receive what is unknown. That orgy of “glitches” that is now happening in the information space is sometimes not at all a result of malicious intent, but an objective factor in the accumulation of existing perception errors, which bad people use.
If it is not clear, again in other words. Adaptive mechanisms of a person are not rubber, you will not stretch your eyes to the back of your head. Forcing our nature to operate with empty abstractions, even with the same ideological clichés, sooner or later leads to the fact that what has made us the crown of creation begins to suffer - our perception, the ability to analyze, laid down by nature, the natural principle of information sharing. What does this oppression mean? We are dumb! How can you not remember the words of Mikhail Zadornov about formatted consciousness.
As an example: where is such a high concept as moral is updated in real time? Of course, not in catechism, but in human relations. Then the question is: in which human relationship? The feat, the nobility show the core of the personality, but are only the result of its formation. Then what makes people come back to this topic over and over again? Of course, not the notation. If you want to plant something, let it feel. Where is the intersection of human destinies, where, voluntarily or unwittingly, are people close by in happiness or distress and looking for mutual understanding?
This is a family, but I ask you to avoid simplifications, various kinds of cliches and, God forgive me, creativity. The concept of “family” in this case should be viewed precisely as a reactor, an intersection of interlacing and collision of people's feelings, female and male, of different generations, which is important, children and parents in time. Each of us, to one degree or another, knows this feeling as a synthesis of a higher concept, we just need to remember it. This crosshair, as long as it exists, is the gyroscope, the generator of meaning, the keeper of memory, and whatever darkening of souls will come, will turn to good even through several generations, and in fact people are divided by so many things. There is, for example, such a German saying, sounding like the bogey of individualism - “everyone dies alone”. And yet we really die alone.
Then the next question. Why break this mechanism? I can swear that it is good, but what's the use of it? Guarantees are provided only by a working structure, which in principle cannot consist of one subject. It's not just gay marriage.
Somehow the lines from Pushkin’s work “Eugene Onegin” came to mind, Tatyana’s words: “But I have been given to another and I will be forever faithful to him”. From the point of view of modern Western morality, this is a wild expression of slave psychology, a manifestation of eerie sexism and male chauvinism. “Pussy Riot”, it turns out, has a lot of work to do, we urgently need to conduct a punk prayer service at the Ministry of Education, exclude Pushkin from the school curriculum and tear down a couple of monuments ...
Alexander Sergeevich, of course, did not want to offend anyone, he wrote in these lines about CORRECTNESS. This case clearly demonstrates what I wrote above at the beginning of this chapter, about the orgy of “glitches”. In the pursuit of fashionable (or false?) Truths, it is impossible to destroy the mechanisms that have shaped the public consciousness for centuries, which inevitably can lead to great distress over time. And the point is not in the dispute of responsibility and freedom, per se, but in the exclusion from the use of suicidal models of behavior. "To be or not to be, that is the question."
But for some reason, no one wants to explain this to us, but to play off people with each other, throwing populist slogans - this is right "for hello." Actually, the same “human rights” do not reflect half the rights of the organism, and not the fact that the aspirations of the individual.
Conclusion
The question of the formation of a psychological struggle unit in the relevant structures of the Russian Federation has long been overdue and overripe. I will not hide, the cycle of articles about psychological weapons was conceived by me in order to determine the presence of such services, since I wrote very interesting things "for people who are in the subject." But the reality once again laughed at my naivety, it was the events in Ukraine that showed that there was no such unit. All sorts of dark offices, in a different way and you will not name, such as the public association "Russia 2045" - do not count.
This is very bad, as sane work on psychological weapons and its use could save many lives.
For those who do not have time to read my earlier materials on this topic, a brief reference to the prerequisites indicating the need for the emergence of such structures.
Sun Tzu, “The Art of War,” a treatise of the second half of the 5th century BC (453 — 403).
“... he who knows how to wage a war conquers a foreign army without fighting; takes foreign fortresses without besieging; crushes a foreign state, not holding his army for a long time. He always keeps everything intact, and this contests power. Therefore, it is possible without blunting weapons to have a benefit: this is the rule of strategic attack. ”
One of my acquaintances, a semi-gangster, a semi-entrepreneur, said: “Things must be done, so that you are happy to give me your money.
I don’t know how much, only the last decades we can quite characterize with the term “ideological occupation”. The war of meanings (again, motivations) is a manifestation of the highest strategic form of psychological weapons, and there is still a natural variety of tactical methods.
It is interesting, by the way, from a position of historical materialism to consider rethinking the causes of defeat in the Russian-Japanese war of 1904-1905, in the works of A.N. Stepanova in the novel "Port Arthur", A.S. Novikov-Priboy in the novel "Tsushima", eyewitnesses of those events when, among other things, it was about the psychological component. In light of this, it is logical to subsequently, regardless of the political background, the formation of the institution of political workers in the Red Army and the Soviet Army. And even in our time it was not possible to declare this a misunderstanding.
However, there was no scientific, systematic, conscious approach to this topic, and no. We continue to blindly follow the circumstances, and the processes of evolutionary development, excuse me, as they had us and they have. The Ukrainian crisis is a clear confirmation of this. While circumstances were favorable, the commander of the Black Sea fleet During the Crimean events, Alexander Viktorovich Vitko could threaten in an interview: “If at least someone shoots from a slingshot,” and this somehow worked. But in a more complex environment, this became a sign of powerlessness.
The same Mikhalkov as a representative of exorcism and cultural enlightenment, the same Kiselev as a representative of the journalist corps, or Vitko as a representative of the armed forces can be excellent mouthpieces, but they are just performers, they can be given responsibility for specific events, but push them what politicians have failed to do, up to the formation of a missing ideology, will be wrong.
Here is the philosopher Ilyin and who else was pulled out of naphthalene after him. Hmmm ...
But the time is not far off when the opposing sides will monitor and shoot, like the "Mossad" Iranian nuclear physicists, specialists in psychological weapons. So the NSA started financing the development of programs that track sarcasm networks. Down and Out trouble started!
What else to say about this? Very sorry. This is where I could help.
And further. I was always amazed by the fact that in spite of the fact that everyone uses tricks in life, those people who like to read the yellow press and watch Ren-TV channel are convinced that the means of mental activity should look like a box with buttons, sometimes with an antenna . Apparently, for complacency.