In the Eastern Military District, fighters master collimator sights

45
Fighters of the Eastern Military District, serving in the general military association, stationed in the Amur region, began to develop new collimator sights, designed for small weapons.Information about this posted on its website Ministry of Defense of Russia.

In the Eastern Military District, fighters master collimator sights


The 1P63 sights for Kalashnikov assault rifles and light machine guns that have been commissioned are designed for aimed shooting at any time of the day, that is, during the day, at dusk and at night.

Targeting is carried out on the sighting of the grid. His image is in the so-called visible infinity. At dusk, the aiming grid is illuminated by a radioluminescent source.

The collimator sight provides simplicity and convenience of aiming, which allows in conditions of dynamic combat and limited time to fire from unstable positions more effectively.

The sight can be used at air temperatures from -50 to + 50˚С and relative humidity up to 100%.

Deliveries of sights are carried out as part of the program to re-equip the military district to 2020.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    19 June 2014 17: 05
    captured a non-sniper.
    1. +5
      19 June 2014 17: 10
      How! From "white tights"! Pull up! A vintar in "one place"! DO NOT REGRET!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Stalker
        +1
        20 June 2014 00: 07
        A vintar in "one place"! DO NOT REGRET!

        Only do not file the front sight with a file ... lol
    2. tnship2
      +4
      19 June 2014 17: 12
      It seems that transvestites are already fighting in Ukraine for the Kiev regime?
    3. +3
      19 June 2014 17: 36
      Listen, so pleased by herself, to her wall without too much talk.
  2. +7
    19 June 2014 17: 08
    We urgently need armored vehicles and heavy weapons - because of their lack in sufficient quantities (and simply in minimal quantities), people are dying and dying in our country! Now 7 wounded have been brought from near Yampol. I know for sure about 2 "two hundred" (I think there are more of them). Apart from the tank, the enemy had 4-5 BMDs knocked out. But if we had AT LEAST ONE TANK there, then the enemy would not even poke his head around! And there would not have been these losses ... We need combat armored vehicles everywhere. Near Slavyansk, near Kramatorsk, near Donetsk, near Lugansk, near Snezhnoye, near Saur-Mogila. At least in a ratio of 1 to 10 - and we will be able to firmly hold our positions, and if 1 to 5 - we will start to attack ... But alas ... Probably, on paper we have been "helped" for a long time. And, probably, they are already "twisting holes for orders" for this help.

    Igor Gunmen
    1. Reading
      0
      19 June 2014 21: 05
      It's time to hear the man !!!! Not entering the troops asks for weapons !! More than sure, significant assistance is coming from the West - they are not afraid of anything. And we, forever, with an eye out.
  3. +2
    19 June 2014 17: 08
    We urgently need armored vehicles and heavy weapons - because of their lack in sufficient quantities (and simply in minimal quantities), people are dying and dying in our country! Now 7 wounded have been brought from near Yampol. I know for sure about 2 "two hundred" (I think there are more of them). Apart from the tank, the enemy had 4-5 BMDs knocked out. But if we had AT LEAST ONE TANK there, then the enemy would not even poke his head around! And there would not have been these losses ... We need combat armored vehicles everywhere. Near Slavyansk, near Kramatorsk, near Donetsk, near Lugansk, near Snezhnoye, near Saur-Mogila. At least in a ratio of 1 to 10 - and we will be able to firmly hold our positions, and if 1 to 5 - we will start to attack ... But alas ... Probably, on paper we have been "helped" for a long time. And, probably, they are already "twisting holes for orders" for this help.

    Igor Gunmen
    1. Old Cynic
      +1
      19 June 2014 17: 17
      And where are the 3 tanks pressed from the APU? Are you on an unscheduled MOT?
      Or were they just gone?
      1. Reading
        0
        19 June 2014 21: 07
        Well, you, our attentive! Just do not make hasty conclusions!
    2. +6
      19 June 2014 18: 21
      do not panic. Shooters periodically reports on the last cartridge and continues to knock them out tanks and planes. This is a report to the outside world. Strelkov knows his business tightly.
      1. Reading
        0
        19 June 2014 21: 08
        Respect!
  4. +10
    19 June 2014 17: 09
    The collimator sight gives an entirely different quality of shot. Especially when driving. The accuracy is much higher.
    1. +3
      19 June 2014 17: 15
      I agree. I tried it. With collimator everything is better
  5. Alexey Prikazchikov
    +1
    19 June 2014 17: 09
    Not Eotec or timp but of course fish and fishless.
  6. +1
    19 June 2014 17: 10
    here with, at, to, and is fighting with his own people to count such
  7. +1
    19 June 2014 17: 13
    They press men, Yampol fell. To Donetsk, through Raisins another column of tanks passed ...

    In the DNR militia, they said that because of the strong onslaught of the Ukrainian security forces, the village of Yampol (Donetsk region) had to be surrendered, now self-defense fighters are retreating near Seversk and Slavyansk, media reported citing sources in the militia.

    According to representatives of the Donetsk People’s Republic, the Ukrainian side involved about 100 units of military equipment. Wounded and dead are also reported, but their exact number is not yet known.

    Just a few hours ago, in the afternoon, the DPR self-defense announced an attack on the town of Yampol.

    In addition, there is information about losses from the Ukrainian security forces, preliminary, several tanks were lined up.
  8. +3
    19 June 2014 17: 16
    I could be mistaken (I can’t figure it out in the photo), but in my opinion it’s better to make the mount universal, with a picatini and tail.
    1. +4
      19 June 2014 17: 22
      Quote: Imperial
      I could be mistaken (I can’t figure it out in the photo), but in my opinion it’s better to make the mount universal, with a picatini and tail

      Probably under the old Kalash request
      1. +1
        19 June 2014 17: 26
        But to make two models in my opinion is more expensive than one station wagon, and why are they again wise there? For example, that detail, the tail itself (I understand that it is solid cast) where the stiffeners are made separate and that's all, although maybe I'm wrong.
  9. 0
    19 June 2014 17: 20
    Where is this wonderful sight mounted on a regular machine?
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      +1
      19 June 2014 17: 29
      On the ak 74m that went after 92 or 91, they are called by the way (ak 74m arr 92g) shorter there the side bar is like a dovetail. A good mount, of course, but taking into account the fact that our optics are fuvian and the people put by hook or by crook the western calimators. That he has a hard minus is neo-irreversibility. To put the same measure 21 you need an adapter, but this weight is all the same.
      1. 0
        19 June 2014 18: 10
        Such bars were up to 91 years, but not on all machines.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      19 June 2014 18: 04
      On the side standard bar
      1. +1
        19 June 2014 22: 12
        But then the butt can’t be folded?!?
        1. 0
          20 June 2014 14: 59
          Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
          But then the butt can’t be folded?!?

          There is such a thing
  10. 0
    19 June 2014 17: 25
    And where is this done?
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      +2
      19 June 2014 17: 30
      And where is this done?


      But tries this old gamma needed. When his replaced modern gyrfalcon should come.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. me
    me
    +5
    19 June 2014 17: 31
    And black matte paint could not be painted so as not to glare?
  12. 0
    19 June 2014 17: 33
    it’s good that advanced technologies are used in our armament, it would be possible to send several parties of sights in the form of aid to New Russia.
    1. 0
      20 June 2014 00: 58
      What is new there? Colimators used in the 1st World War.

      Like all optical instruments, it has one drawback, although not as pronounced as in optics. Limits the breadth of view. Although very convenient. Mark was sent to the target and the push trigger. Nothing to combine.
    2. 0
      20 June 2014 03: 08
      To put it mildly, far from advanced technologies :)
  13. portoc65
    0
    19 June 2014 17: 34
    You don’t need to master anything now, all sights, let's go to Donbas! Our junta is crushing .. Poroshenko-mud ... lo ...
  14. +1
    19 June 2014 17: 53
    I tried to put something like this on my shotgun, but it didn’t work out very well. The habit of pointing over the trunk, and shooting at a vskidku on the position of the weapon in the shoulder - does not give such an opportunity, somewhere to look. There is no time to pull the trigger. Maybe a good thing, but he personally refused it. Gimoroy thing, however. Open sight, aiming on the barrel, then adjusting the rear sight. Nothing sweats, you don’t need to wipe anything from the dirt .. Maybe someone likes it. I did not like. Personal opinion. Even optics on the hunt with rifled is so-always one gimor, everything is foggy. (maybe in greenhouse conditions, fine, but on the go, when you run for moose, not really). An open sight is a more suitable thing for 100-200 meters .. I don’t know about the War, I haven’t tried it yet ..
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Alexey Prikazchikov
      +2
      19 June 2014 18: 09
      I tried to put something like this on my shotgun, but it didn’t work out very well. The habit of pointing over the trunk, and shooting at a vskidku on the position of the weapon in the shoulder - does not give such an opportunity, somewhere to look. There is no time to pull the trigger. Maybe a good thing, but he personally refused it. Gimoroy thing, however. Open sight, aiming on the barrel, then adjusting the rear sight. Nothing sweats, you don’t need to wipe anything from the dirt .. Maybe someone likes it. I did not like. Personal opinion. Even optics on the hunt with rifled is so-always one gimor, everything is foggy. (maybe in greenhouse conditions, fine, but on the go, when you run for moose, not really). An open sight is a more suitable thing for 100-200 meters .. I don’t know about the War, I haven’t tried it yet ..


      For people like you, there are open-type calimators. Type of this
      1. 0
        19 June 2014 19: 27
        Again it is necessary to wipe. In the swamp, it’s not very good. Well, in the winter, it's actually a squeak. From my breath, everything is misting.
      2. 0
        19 June 2014 19: 50
        Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
        There are open-type kalimators. Type of this

        This is a closed collimator. Open there is a photo above, cobra.
        In a closed collimator, the emitter and the glass with the coating are in the same housing, sealed and even vacuum, so as not to sweat inside. It does not rain. Well, the truth is, you need to wipe the glass if water gets in, because the distortion appears like on any optics. And in the open type, the marker emitter and the glass are open, enough droplets or specks on the emitter and the mark will blur or even disappear. I have a yapovsky of a closed type on a wild boar, with appropriate preparation and utilization, it is quite possible to take in.
        1. 0
          20 June 2014 01: 10
          Wow .. yes, at least everything will be glass in shit, the brand will not blur anywhere. But it is very poorly visible through the glass.
  15. +1
    19 June 2014 18: 54
    It's time to hang
  16. -4
    19 June 2014 18: 57
    What is this ****, the central mark is visible at night no. At night, only three brands are visible that can aim at 50-100 meters maximum.
    1. +2
      20 June 2014 01: 14
      Another wise guy .. The collimator scope is not for sniper shooting invented.
      His role is different. Healing time is minimized. Just put a mark on the target and shoot.
      It is especially convenient in a dense clash, when goals change very quickly.
      If it’s time to heal, it’s better to hemp .. There is at least a correction for the range ..
      1. 0
        20 June 2014 16: 51
        I had a simple Rakurs-A from the production of oil refineries, day and night I passed all the exercises perfectly up to 400m inclusively. There is no division into night and day sighting marks. On the daytime to 1P63 no complaints, but at night ....
    2. +1
      20 June 2014 06: 21
      Quote: Marssik
      What is this ****, the central mark is visible at night no. At night, only three brands are visible that can aim at 50-100 meters maximum.

      What nonsense. What are you talking about? What are the three brands, what is the central ..., and even invisible at night lol
      1. +1
        20 June 2014 16: 55
        What are the three brands, what is the central ..., and even invisible at night
        Have you looked in 1H63? No . Chatterbox)))
        1. +1
          20 June 2014 18: 24
          Quote: Marssik
          Have you looked in 1H63? No . Chatterbox)))

          What are you talking about again? It's about a collimator sight. Its purpose is shooting up to 100-150 meters, mainly in close combat. Which to x - m 400 meters, God be with you. Chatterbox himself)))
          1. 0
            25 June 2014 22: 55
            Are you only going to fight in cities and forests? What will you do in the sands and in the steppes?
  17. Stypor23
    0
    19 June 2014 19: 05
    And the press is screaming that the new technology is in batches entering the army. Here, only sights are slowly being mastered.
  18. 0
    19 June 2014 21: 25
    Correctly. It is necessary to introduce such equipment for a long time ...
  19. +1
    19 June 2014 22: 35
    well ... people who used it about him have no better opinion. compared to the same eotech ... the only plus is that they can nail nails.
  20. +2
    20 June 2014 03: 03
    New:)? Funny) How old is he?
    This is already yesterday, this is a huge, awkward, heavy stray. In theory, she also outweighs the machine to the left. Why not integrate the fucking centimeters of the Picatinny rail into the 5 receiver? And hang there anything, anytime, anytime. Why do I, even not serving in the army, know and understand all this, but I don’t? This is a mystery to me. Or are they only thinking where to build grandchildren?
  21. 0
    20 June 2014 05: 44
    it was high time to start equipping military units with these "toys" ... soldier
  22. +1
    20 June 2014 09: 56
    seemingly heavy, I don’t understand why our entire optics are so healthy and uncomfortable?
    1. +1
      20 June 2014 13: 52
      And when the guest and technical requirements of the customer - less will fail, but on old equipment ...
    2. The comment was deleted.