Ukraine is not going to curtail cooperation with the alliance in favor of Russia

34
Ukraine is not going to curtail cooperation with the alliance in favor of RussiaPresident of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych has taken a course towards rapprochement with NATO, despite the non-aligned status of the country announced by him. This is evidenced by Kommersant's possession of a closed document with a schedule of Ukrainian-NATO events for 2011. It follows that Kiev and NATO are discussing issues as sensitive for Moscow as the future of the Black Sea fleet RF, missile defense, reform of Ukrainian intelligence and even the concept of foreign policy.

The fact that not everything went smoothly in relations between Ukraine and Russia, even under the "pro-Russian" President Viktor Yanukovych, was known before. But the first open conflict was their squabble over Sea Breeze-2011 exercises. Last week, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation made an extremely tough statement to Ukraine and the United States about entering the Black Sea to participate in the maneuvers of the US Navy missile cruiser Monterey, equipped with the Aegis multipurpose anti-aircraft missile system. “The appearance in the immediate vicinity of the Russian borders of elements of the strategic infrastructure of the United States” and the “reconnaissance” by the American anti-missiles of the Black Sea water area by the Russian Foreign Ministry called Russia a “security threat”.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine stated that it “does not see a real or potential threat to any of the countries of the region” in connection with the start of maneuvers. “Such military measures help to overcome false phobias and stereotypes inherited from the period of the Cold War,” said Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Dikusarov, who pricked Moscow. A State Department spokesman, Mark Toner, noted that Washington and Kiev have "strong bilateral relations," in which "these exercises fit."

However, these explanations did not remove the concerns of Moscow. “Being in opposition to Yushchenko, Yanukovych did everything to ensure that NATO exercises in Ukraine did not take place, but now they do not just pass, but pass in a provocative format,” Konstantin Kosachev, head of the Duma’s international affairs committee, told Kommersant.

The tonality of these statements reminded the period when Ukraine was led by Viktor Yushchenko, whom the Kremlin directly called the "anti-Russian" politician. But a year ago, they exulted in Moscow: the new Ukrainian leader, Viktor Yanukovich, made geopolitical concessions, which Russia did not dream of at Orange: in exchange for cheap Russian gas, Kiev provided Moscow with guarantees of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation in Sevastopol until 2042. The deal had another important effect for Moscow: it closed Kiev’s road to NATO for a long time, since the alliance does not accept countries with foreign military bases on its territory. In addition, in June last year, the Supreme Rada adopted a law on the fundamentals of domestic and foreign policy, which states: "Ukraine is a non-bloc state." Mr. Yanukovych promptly signed him, burying President Yushchenko’s idea of ​​Ukraine’s joining NATO. So at least they thought in Moscow.

Now there is no such certainty. At the disposal of "Kommersant" was a closed document, indicating that Viktor Yanukovych is stepping up cooperation with the alliance even more active than its predecessor. We are talking about the schedule of cooperation activities in the framework of the NATO-Ukraine Commission (NUC) for 2011 year. The first version of the document was approved by the countries of the alliance and Kiev 23 February 2011 of the year - the day before the cabinet of Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov approved the "Annual Ukraine-NATO cooperation program" (its details were not disclosed). 23 May amended the schedule. The updated version of the document was signed by NATO Deputy Secretary General for Political Affairs, James Appathurai.

According to the plan, a total of 64 events are planned for this year within the framework of the NUC. It follows from the document that the Ukrainian authorities and representatives of the alliance behind closed doors are discussing very sensitive issues for Moscow: security in the Black Sea region and the future of the Russian Black Sea Fleet deployed in Crimea, missile defense, Transnistrian settlement, Ukraine’s energy and economic security, reforming its intelligence agencies. The plan even includes such a clause as a discussion of Ukraine’s foreign policy strategy — two meetings within the framework of the KNU in June are devoted to this topic: the first is supposed to discuss the general principles of Ukraine’s foreign policy, and the second the draft strategy.

According to Kommersant, it is known about the intensification of cooperation between Kiev and NATO in Moscow. In any case, Konstantin Kosachev spoke out in this regard unequivocally. “For us, Ukraine’s actions in the NATO direction are not completely transparent. In the footsteps of Kiev, we see inconsistency. They tell us one thing and do another. This is regrettable and we will react to it,” the Kommersant promised.

Another senior interlocutor in the Russian power structures said to Kommersant altogether: "The document shows the complete lack of independence of Ukraine in shaping its foreign policy. All this is weakly associated with the non-aligned status proclaimed by its leadership and refusal of integration into NATO."

In Kiev, this question is categorically disagreed. Sergey Grinevetsky, First Deputy Head of the Supreme Rada Committee on National Security and Defense, referring to the aforementioned law on the fundamentals of domestic and foreign policy, recalled that "it speaks of both" Ukraine’s adherence to non-bloc policy "and the continuation of a constructive partnership with NATO and other military-political blocs on all issues of mutual interest. "" According to him, Ukraine did not adopt a separate law on non-aligned status. “It was only a question of a“ non-blocking policy ”, which does not mean our withdrawal from the development process of the European security system,” Mr. Grinevetsky said. To the Kommersant question about reproaches Kiev of insincerity, the deputy replied: "Who would say about this - Russia, on the one hand, calls Ukraine a strategic partner, and on the other - puts economic pressure on it."

Even more frankly, the current state of Russian-Ukrainian relations was commented on condition of anonymity by a high-ranking Kommersant source in the Ukrainian government: "We had the illusion that if we remove key irritants in our relations with the Russian Federation, such as recognition of the famine as genocide, plans to join NATO, and unwillingness to extend presence The Black Sea Fleet, everything will be fine. But this did not happen. Moscow wants us to be in its orbit and pay extra for it as well. Take at least the Customs Union. We are there very strange call t. We can not say that we will benefit from it, and indicate that they have lost and how sanctions shall receive, if we give him to enter, and God forbid, create a free trade zone with the EU. " According to the Kommersant interlocutor, Kiev does not like this approach, and since there is no equal dialogue, they intend to get closer to Europe. “It’s not we moving away from Russia, but it pushes us away,” the official explained. And Ukraine’s close relations with NATO explained: “We are continuing to reform our army according to the alliance’s patterns, and this is not a secret. The plan of joint activities is the usual practice of informing partners on issues of interest to them.”

All this may mean that the short idyll in relations between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, which began with the coming to power of Viktor Yanukovych, is coming to an end. Against this background, the West does not hide its readiness for closer interaction with Kiev, who is disillusioned with Russia. In early June, US Ambassador to Ukraine John Tefft stated that "the doors of the alliance remain open to European democracies such as Ukraine," and particularly noted its "Euro-Atlantic aspirations and orientation." And in the draft report on NATO to Ukraine, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly explicitly states that "at a practical level, the partnership between the alliance and Ukraine continues, despite Kiev’s new policy" and that "Yanukovych was not a pro-Russian politician like Moscow would like." A source at NATO headquarters said “Kommersant”: “Russia should not be offended by Ukraine’s friendship with the alliance. After all, we don’t drag anyone anywhere by force.”
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Superduck
    -2
    21 June 2011 11: 23
    I don't know, it seems even when Kuchma beat Kravchuk, he left almost only on the Russian map in Russia, they should have understood that there are no pro-Russian presidents in Ukraine. There are those who do not like her and those who throw her. Yanukovych is one of the latter, he is worried about the business interests of his boys, and the boys did not like the fact that they cannot fuck with nichrome from Russia, and they have had much more from Europe for a long time, so they decided that why they needed to play dangerous games with the Russian evil business. Well, as for the agreement on prolonging the stay of the fleet, the exchange for cheap gas has broken off, there is no cheap gas, Ukrainian business does not want to get it through the customs union, I’ve seen the example of Belarusians and Kazakhs, when they lost the most juicy enterprises and merged them into Russian Jews. There was already a signal for the fleet, the Supreme Rada's commission on international relations had already issued a conclusion that the "fleet for gas" agreement should be denounced (in the commission most of the PR), but of course they did not vote for this, and not because they love Russia so much , but because it was intended that way.
    Those. if there is no cheap gas, they will push Russia from Sevastopol, Russia will feed Crimeans pies returning to mother’s bosom, and then either donkey or paddies will die.
    1. His
      0
      21 June 2011 19: 46
      We will simply return what we always owned, even before your Yushchenko
  2. Antwerp
    +1
    21 June 2011 11: 44
    When will customs duties be introduced with Ukraine?
    They stick their labels on imported goods or (repackage, recycle, etc.), and the Russian border for "Ukrainian" goods becomes transparent.
    Our business can only dream of such privileges.
    1. Superduck
      -1
      21 June 2011 12: 00
      You are a young man lost in time. What you wrote is what Russia is afraid of if Ukraine enters the European free trade zone. It has not yet arrived and not the fact that it will come. It reminds me of Miller, who announces the theft of gas by Ukraine in early summer.
  3. Splin
    0
    21 June 2011 12: 12
    Russia conducts exercises and trainings not less or even more than Ukraine in conjunction with NATO, and the emphasis is on our events as a jealous OWNER.

    And who threw on the Fairway of the World? Where did the ships go. To the shores of Spain, NATO !!! Because of this, the submarine "Zaporozhye" did not pass sea trials in the open sea. So that they themselves have a stigma in ...
    1. Superduck
      -1
      21 June 2011 12: 26
      And not just to the shores of Spain, but in the immediate vicinity of the place where peaceful NATO corn cob pollinates the camel thorns in the Libyan desert with herbicides. In the language of big politics, this is called a show of force, only a show of force is not for NATO, but for all of you beloved Gaddafi together with the coalition.
  4. His
    0
    21 June 2011 12: 39
    What do we feed them? It's time to return our lands
  5. Shown
    -1
    21 June 2011 12: 51
    Come and get it. Only wear a stronger belt on your pants so that it doesn’t burst from the strain
    1. His
      0
      21 June 2011 12: 55
      Break you do not fix. Russia will win all!
      1. Superduck
        +1
        21 June 2011 12: 57
        Go for a week - take Domansky, warm up.
    2. +2
      21 June 2011 14: 20
      Take the snake back, then come out ...
      1. Superduck
        -1
        21 June 2011 14: 29
        Змеиный только что забрал, можешь проверить http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%28%D0%B
        E%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%29
        What else to pick up, order the great strategist!
        1. His
          0
          21 June 2011 15: 45
          Thatched roof
      2. His
        0
        21 June 2011 15: 44
        Shameful prosrany some Romanians
  6. +1
    21 June 2011 14: 19
    Yes, let them play their toys with NATO, EU, if only Sevastopol had not been touched, but the entry was normal.
  7. antwerp
    +1
    21 June 2011 16: 11
    Super Duck.
    Only VAT is applied to goods from Ukraine, but there are no customs duties. This is already a few years.
    Only the auto industry is protected in Russia, and the rest compete with Ukrainian enterprises, where low salaries, low rents,
    contraband raw materials.
    1. Superduck
      -2
      21 June 2011 16: 37
      C'mon, why is Putin promising to remove customs duties on gas if she enters the Customs Union? And there is also an additional customs fee for a bunch of items (caramel, high pressure pipes, a bunch of types of rolled products). To be honest, I’m not special in customs legislation and I don’t have time to google at all, but I’m sure that you are confusing something. They promised to remove customs duties only upon entry into the customs union, I'm sorry to repeat myself.
      1. His
        0
        21 June 2011 19: 47
        That we all owe you but don’t want to
  8. +1
    21 June 2011 16: 14
    Oh Ukrainians-Ukrainians play out. history does not teach you anything!
    1. His
      0
      21 June 2011 19: 49
      Soon their freebie will end. Russian man suffers for a long time, but not to infinity, rodents have already been taught
      1. 0
        18 August 2011 12: 58
        So this, Ukrainians and rodents are two big differences ...
  9. +1
    21 June 2011 19: 16
    history does not know such a state Ukraine. It has never been and is unlikely to continue in the future. so I consider the disputes futile
    1. His
      0
      21 June 2011 19: 48
      Do not cherish what accidentally fell into your hands, -Removed-
  10. clean
    +1
    22 June 2011 04: 43
    The Ukrainian government now resembles a stray dog ​​that prowls from side to side and thinks about who will get the most from. What is it that so prompted Ukrainians that they gathered in NATO? It’s just a cheap provocation, you don’t give us gas, then we will be friends with others, conduct joint maneuvers with the states, etc., etc., but it’s not clear what the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense maneuvers, because in Ukraine there is no Navy as such and it is not clear what privileges Ukraine will receive by becoming a member of the North Atlantic Alliance. Seichas clearly shows that the "Nezalezhnosti" of Ukraine is just a fiction, Ukraine cannot independently integrate into world politics, not into the world economy, they still need to depend on someone else, let it be NATO, the EU or the United States. They cannot understand that this gas is ours, it really costs money, and their abstract promises are not standing and a broken hryvnia. They cannot understand or simply do not want that without the help of Russia in the last 20 years associated with significant discounts on natural gas Ukraine would look as now Kyrgyzstan. They can not understand the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation is needed by Ukraine no less than Russia, otherwise they will not go to the beach to sunbathe, not to mention sea trips, since not Ukrainian warships will ply near the coast of Ukraine. I apologize for possibly harsh statements in my comments, but without mutually beneficial proposals and without mutually beneficial conditions, Russia will not feed anyone for free, this has already been shown on the example of Belarus. You wanted "Nezalezhnosti", you have it, it's just that there are no reasons in the world economy when one country feeds another for beautiful eyes.
  11. Stavr
    Stavr
    +1
    22 June 2011 09: 10
    paster, here you have bent ... "it's just that the world economy has no problems when one country feeds another for beautiful eyes."
    Ukraine was a subsidized Republic when, during the times of the USSR, it was part of it. At least you know about this?
    And the rest I agree with you.
  12. clean
    +2
    22 June 2011 10: 16
    Dear Stavr, as a Soviet officer I served in the Ukrainian SSR and am very well informed about the economy of the Republic of Ukraine. I can tell you a little story. At the end of the school, I was sent for further service in the Transcarpathian VO and somehow at lunch in the officer's canteen with his classmate who was a Ukrainian, there was a conversation about the wonderful Republic of Ukraine, how healthy and satisfying everything is there, it was just on the eve of the collapse of the USSR somewhere 1988-1989. And indeed to me, a kid who had lived all his life in remote Siberia, life in Ukraine seemed like a paradise. Crammed up stores and markets with food and consumer goods, when my mother came to visit me she did not know what to grab onto in the first place, because we had nothing at all in Siberia. Sausage for 2.80 and 3.20 rubles. and for that queue they left the store around the corner. But even in those days, I knew that the prosperity of Ukraine was artificially created, since we can see consumer goods produced in the RSFSR on Ukrainian counters, and there was never any Ukrainian sausage in Siberia. And this means that the agrarian republic spends most of its food products for internal use, while receiving products from other republics for nothing. And I shared this with my classmate, although he shouted that without Russia, literally in a year they would become a very developed and self-sufficient state with which everyone in the world would get along. Well, as I told him, it turned out that, having lost help from the center (Moscow), Ukraine as a self-sufficient, proud and beautiful republic ceased to exist, with which no one in the world reckons, and only zilch remained from the industry that they had ... And I had to take a translation and go to serve closer to my parents' house, since not many other officers did not believe in "Nezalezhnosti" and refused to swear allegiance to Ukraine. And now in Siberia we also have counters of lomyat from everything, so it's not in vain that we threw an extra ballast in the face of the Union republics and they freed themselves from our "Cabal", now let them learn to produce and trade with neighbors on their own, otherwise they got used to fat under bursting with a pillow and at the same time not giving anything to anyone. So dear Stavr, I was not talking about the republic of Ukraine as part of the USSR, but already about the "Independent" country of Ukraine
    1. Superduck
      -2
      22 June 2011 11: 37
      From the time when my father went to Moscow on a business trip, he drove back to Kharkov sausage, toilet paper, sneakers and chocolate candies for me. Well, to hell with him, blessed is he who believes.
      1. +2
        22 June 2011 11: 44
        Do you think it was better in Russia with these goods?
        Whole "sausage" trains went to Moscow from the Russian province.
    2. His
      0
      22 June 2011 14: 59
      The most important thing is that they themselves separated their tongue no one pulled.
  13. clean
    0
    22 June 2011 11: 59
    SuperDuck, you say this to the person who saw everything with his own eyes. And please do not align Moscow with all of Russia, and now it is not like all of Russia lives. I speak generally about Russia, and not about a separate region within the country.
    1. Superduck
      -2
      22 June 2011 12: 18
      I, too, am not 12 years old, compared with the central black earth region and the Urals, I would not say that in those days there was such an abundance in the Ukrainian SSR. Fruits and vegetables, yes, but it is more a merit of the private sector, I think it’s not worth explaining. In Latvia then it was cooler in grub, in St. Petersburg also in industrial goods, too. I traveled half the country during the USSR, I was a tourist. In Siberia, it was certainly gloomy for grub, you can’t do this, but there are also natural reasons for that. Those who worked at BAM passed driving industrial goods in Ukraine in full, carpets, tape recorders, televisions, cars and other scarce goods. But the fact that they didn’t bring fresh cherries to Krasnoyarsk is not the fault of the Ukrainian population. As for subsidies .. well, I don’t know, the largest industrial cities of Ukraine - Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk, Zaporozhye, Nikolaev worked almost 70-80% for the defense industry, by definition, it was unprofitable. The same applied to almost the entire Ural region. Yes, in the USSR, perhaps Tyumen only drove gold into the treasury, such a distribution. I myself am from Kharkov, almost all the large factories of the city made a military commissariat, with the possible exception of Turboatom and Sickle and Hammer. Those. subsidized region is a very controversial thing.
  14. Stavr
    Stavr
    +2
    22 June 2011 12: 53
    Thanks for the answer, Paster. I will tell you a similar case: how the property of the Union was divided. During all this perestroika bustle, my friend, a pilot, found himself at one of the military airfields in Kazakhstan, when, so to speak, the borders were "cut". This aviation colonel on the sly with his colleagues secretly from the Kazakhs prepared a whole regiment of bombers for the flight to the territory of Russia. And what did they feed this regiment? Pasha Grachev sent almost a wagonload of 3-liter cans of tomato juice! No more food was received from Russia for the regiment deployed in Kazakhstan. On command, the regiment lifted all the planes into the air and flew to the territory of Russia, leaving only the local servants in place: ensigns and sergeants (mostly Kazakhs). How the colonel managed to do this already while protecting the airfield by the Kazakhs is shrouded in mystery, but as a result he received a reprimand from Pasha Grachev (instead of the Hero's Star) and was assigned to serve as a military commissar in one of the Russian district towns. And a whole regiment of heavy bombers is still in the service of the Russian Air Force.
    1. His
      0
      22 June 2011 14: 45
      The same thing happened with our warships in Ukraine, when Kravchuk wanted to privatize them.
  15. Oleg
    +1
    23 June 2011 07: 58
    His,
    It was not the same with "our warships in the Ukraine".
    Fleet property was divided equally. Not fraternally, but equally. And what happened over time is clearly visible. In the Navy, the crumbs remained from what went on needles or was simply plundered. Yes, and the broad under the military units were characteristically treated: the unnecessary - was abandoned, and the one in tidbits - to their people under the cottages. Tidbits remained under the Black Sea Fleet ...