National radicals: a role in the current Ukrainian crisis

26
National radicals: a role in the current Ukrainian crisis


In full accordance with the canons and testaments of modern propaganda, Ukrainian “loyal” journalists and experts continue to repeat that there are no fascists and neo-Nazis in Ukraine. For a thinking person, the intensity of such negatives speaks volumes of itself. Meanwhile, the fascists and neo-Nazis in Ukraine are not just there, they have been around for a long time and are very active. And the Saturday attack on the Russian embassy in Kiev with the connivance of the authorities is a clear confirmation of this.

What are the Ukrainian national radicals outside of a kind of artificial federation “Right Sector”, created for media purposes? And what should we expect from them today, when the main “revolutionary” function has been fulfilled, and on the “throne”, the far from main candidate, from their point of view, is the candidate? Let's figure it out.

* * *

First of all, it should be noted that the Ukrainian national-radicals for the most part represent strike combat organizations.

Those responsible for ideological work shifted to the parliamentary plane in connection with obtaining the parliamentary status of VO “Svoboda”.

As a result, the national-radical “theorists” (“Freedom”, the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists, and others) are moving away from practical activity. Therefore, on the Maidan, they were not as prominently represented as outside it. The deputies of Freedom preferred to attack the head of the NTU after the coup, rather than participate in direct clashes with the police and the Berkut. Therefore, militant national radicals today perceive Freedom, which has long been skeptical, as traitors to Ukrainian radical nationalism.

This is quite curious, because “Freedom” has the same roots as its activity as “Patriot of Ukraine”, one of the most aggressive organizations included in the “Right Sector”.

Both inherit the Social-Nationalist Party of Ukraine, which, after transformation at the party level, in VO "Svoboda" simultaneously singled out a street combat unit ("Patriot of Ukraine"). The conflict between these two parts is explained not only and not so much by the differences in the “methodological” part, but by different curators.

VO Svoboda at the national level enjoyed the support and sponsorship of large political parties (the Party of Regions, Our Ukraine and its heirs) and large oligarchs, concentrating its work primarily in the western and central regions. Another thing - today's "Patriot of Ukraine." By the way, “Patriot of Ukraine” (created in 1999, headed by A. Parubiy) was officially dissolved simultaneously with the transformation of the SNPU into “Freedom”.

* * *

But the Kharkov cell, at that moment tiny, refused to carry out the decision and gave birth to that “Patriot of Ukraine”, which is known today. This organization is all-Ukrainian, but is registered in Kharkov, where it has the largest representation. Here, “Patriot of Ukraine” and “Freedom” are directly connected with the notorious “Prosvita”, which positions itself as a humanitarian organization. It is known that the "Prosvita" since perestroika times was supervised by the KGB, then the SBU.

“Patriot of Ukraine” in Kharkov was and remains not just a shock street force, but also a significant tool of secret control. He also participates in the work of the SBU: a part of the “office” has always been a direct cooperation with the city and regional authorities, while the other part in charge of the “Patriot of Ukraine” preferred not to cooperate, but to keep them on a leash. Naturally, such a tool as a militant national-radical organization in such a struggle will not interfere.

“Patriot of Ukraine”, both in Kharkov and in other cities, has its own training bases (in most cases abandoned pioneer camps and military units), where it carried out and carries out “vishkili” - combat training with cold and firearms weapons. It was through the "Patriot of Ukraine" that arms were supplied for national-radicals during the active phase of the Maidan. The infamous shooting in Rymarska in Kharkov near the office of the Patriot of Ukraine (he is also the office of Prosvita) was carried out from such weapons. Today, “Patriot of Ukraine” is a typical “assault squad” in the wings of the special services. A significant part of the personnel structure of this organization is “inscribed” in the punitive battalions “Azov”, “Slobozhanshchina” and “Kharkiv-1”, thus obtaining a completely legal status.

The fact that today the leader of the Patriot of Ukraine, Biletsky, formally leads the southeast wing of the Right Sector, does not at all indicate his subordination to Dmitry Yarosh. Biletsky and his organization have little connection with the Kiev authorities, with Poroshenko and Kolomoisky. Dot sponsorship is not counted. The SBU has real control over the “Patriot of Ukraine”, primarily its Kharkiv branch and personally the main sponsor, Arsen Avakov (and not because of his position). Recruit-source for the "Patriot of Ukraine" were and remain high school students, college students, students and football ultras.

* * *

Yarosh, the nominal leader of the “Right Sector”, is directly connected with the organization “Trident named after S. Bandera” that is no less well-known than the “Patriot of Ukraine”.

“Trident” is an analogue of the “Patriot of Ukraine”, the same fighting wing, just not the SNPU, but the Congress of Ukrainian nationalists. In the past.

Today, “Trizub” is an independent national-radical organization, which emphasizes the anti-communist and anti-Russian struggle (“Patriot of Ukraine” in this regard is biased towards large-scale racism) and actively cooperating with the UNA-UNSO. Like the UNA-UNSO, "Trident" is controlled, first of all, by sponsors from among the oligarchs, as well as by the international "breadwinners" of the right-wing radicals, among whom there are foreign special services.

In contrast to the “Patriot of Ukraine”, “Trident”, which, together with the UNA-UNSO, joined the Right Sector political party, is less inclined to street provocations: they are not interested in media, but in material effects. In this regard, today's "Trident" is different from the very sample of 2010-2011, when its militants blew up a monument to Stalin in Zaporozhye. Today, they will prefer to blow up a political opponent, rather than some kind of symbol.

This is explained by the transition to a completely different level of financing and responsibility: it was Trident that became the central core of the Right Sector on the Maidan and ensured the success of the coup; It is on the "Trident" that financial and arms flows are directed throughout Ukraine. Today, "Trident" is no longer the Kiev version of the "Patriot of Ukraine", but a full-fledged tool of mass political terror. And if “Patriot of Ukraine” is a kind of local version of the SA, then “Trident” is the SS germ, not for “elitism” and qualification, but for its intended purpose.

Today's UNA-UNSO, in the past concentrating in itself all Ukrainian national radicals without exception and “made famous” by the participation of its militants in the Chechen wars on the side of the terrorists, doesn’t differ from the “Trident” anything.

* * *

The Right Sector party, created after the coup, merged Trident and the UNA-UNSO, both ideologically, militarily, and in sponsorship.

The peculiarity of “Trizub” and the UNA-UNSO is their complete independence even from today's fully national-fascist Ukrainian special services and security officials, including Avakov.

Among the politically significant figures in the curators of "Trizub" and the UNA-UNSO, we should first of all call Parubiya and Pashinsky.

In this respect, the national radicals united in the new party are a potential danger even for Poroshenko: their alliance with him is of a short-term nature.

Among other, less significant, national-radical organizations are the Kiev “White Hammer”, “Sich” or “Autonomous Nationalists”.

Today, the absolute majority of Ukrainian national radicals rotate in orbits around the "Patriot of Ukraine", "Trizub" and the UNA-UNSO.

At the same time, these orbits by no means coincide, and, depending on the specific interests of the sponsors and curators, at any moment they can intersect not in a collaborationist, but in a conflict mode. And this will contribute to changes associated with the "accession" of Poroshenko.

Not only they, of course. The unbroken resistance of Novorossia will also play its role: hopes for a blitzkrieg and a daily war were not justified, the war is dragging on, the militiamen are suffering losses, but are gaining experience. Considering that by the level of professionalism they were already head and shoulders above both the ukroarmia and purely punitive battalions, it is not surprising that even today we can observe a sharp decline in combat enthusiasm among the units staffed by personnel of various national-radical organizations.

The Donbass, Azov, Slobozhanshchina, and Dnepr battalions are copies of the SS division Galicia. In modern style. They are suitable only to suppress the uprising of civilians. And when they begin to shoot and kill, they are all the forces trying to change the location and occupation.

Therefore, it should be expected that in the near future, national radicals from military units will switch to other forms of activity that do not imply clashes with an armed enemy. They switch, of course, against their will: by their will, they can only desert from their battalions back to the “street fighters”. And you can be sure that the national-radicals led by various masters will start to enter into direct clash with each other insofar as the interests of their above-mentioned masters will collide.

* * *

Poroshenko’s election has already led to significant personnel changes: Pashinsky left the post of head of the presidential administration — one of the curators of Trizub and the UNA-UNSO (“man with a rifle”). And although the head of the government Yatsenyuk does not seem to be biased, but the power unit is still waiting for the shuffling.

As a result of these shuffles, other curators of national radicals — Paruby, Nalyvaychenko, Avakov — may also be left behind. At the same time, apparently, the rotation will not affect the acting. Minister of Defense Koval, who signed hardly Poroshenko’s personal love after the inauguration. Koval and the army team are in a tense relationship with the militant groups of national radicals: the latter are at the same time competitors and wardens in relation to the army.

Accordingly, with the described changes in Poroshenko’s power unit, official security officials (army, police, SBU) and, partly, football ultras, which he shares sponsorship with other active oligarchs (primarily with Kolomoisky), remain as military tools.

National radicals automatically turn into a way of pressure on the president. And if someone comes to mind to collect, for example, the third Maidan (appointing Poroshenko to the presidency by the Americans is annoying not only the completely “militant” Yulia Tymoshenko), then this Maidan will be equipped with well-armed attack aircraft. Of course, Poroshenko is well aware. He will either try to enlist the support of at least some of the national radicals, or he will try to neutralize them — right up to liquidation.

Given that the national radicals do not have real unity and are controlled by different centers (Kolomoisky, Avakov, Nalyvaychenko, Parubiy), the situation of such “feudal” wars between different national-fascist groups seems most likely. Which, of course, is in the hands of the militia of Novorossia: internal strife is able to weaken the Kiev authorities to such an extent that the rigid position of not recognizing the DPR and the LPR and refusing to negotiate with them becomes technically impossible, since the official security forces will have to fight at least two fronts.

Again, for all the evidence of the intellectual weakness of the Kiev junta, it would be presumptuous to believe that Poroshenko does not see all these problems and dispositions. Therefore, along with neutralization and simple “agreements” with national radicals, a scenario in which they receive an even more “institutionalized” legal status than now is no less likely.

It can be expected that, firstly, the so-called volunteer battalions like “Donbass” and “Azov” will be fully equipped with armaments (including heavy ones) and represent an alternative to the army and motley National Guard, which idea was clearly not possible to translate into reality.

Secondly, the status of these national-radical combat units will be maximized, up to the appointment of their personal combat reserve of the president.

And finally, thirdly, for personnel work in these reorganized “presidential” detachments will try to attract the maximum number of participants of the national-radical organizations and movements we considered, simultaneously concluding agreements with already established associations like the Right Sector and continuing to fight “personal guards "oligarchs and competitors.

However, the manual national radicals of the oligarchs one way or another will play on Poroshenko’s side, which is based on an agreement with “the oligarch of all oligarchs” Kolomoisky. Of course, in this case, the consequences for the militia of Novorossia (especially in those cities where the uprising has not yet moved to an armed level) will be threatening.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    18 June 2014 18: 40
    National radicals are still needed, then they will be destroyed as waste and unnecessary material
    1. +3
      18 June 2014 19: 11
      Quote: herruvim
      National radicals are still needed, then they will be destroyed as waste and unnecessary material

      They will not be destroyed.
      Because they now play the role of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the court and executioners in one bottle to clear up the political field, come to power and legalize, and after that they will play the role of punishers to suppress dissent.
      Just look at the history of pre-war Germany, there are a lot of places in history where you can draw a parallel!
  2. +7
    18 June 2014 18: 43
    A good analysis. But with something I would argue ... Why are radicals of stable power? Radicals are good at the first stage of seizing power ... The second stage is usually a grave for most of them. With the help of an external enemy, class or naval struggle, etc. d. And the rest are destroyed simply by repression ... So, all today's battalions are nothing more than a mechanism for grinding radicals with the hands of militias ...
    1. +1
      18 June 2014 18: 52
      Quote: domokl
      Why do radicals of stable power?

      And where, in fact, stable power in Ukraine. And when was she in 23 years of independence? Now another question is worried: where did Yarosh go and what does he do.
      1. +1
        18 June 2014 19: 03
        Counter-question - Why did Poroshenko legitimate? The goal of the coup has been achieved. The power has been seized. Now you need to make it legal. And protect it from the possibility of repeating the fate of the previous one.
        And the answer to the second question, Archpriest Yarosh perfectly understood everything. It seems to me that he took the offered bucks and now a new millionaire has appeared on the islands somewhere ... But his deputies can really be involved in, in particular, diversion on the gas pipeline .. .
    2. 0
      18 June 2014 18: 57
      As above Herruvim said waste and unnecessary material. They used it to a landfill, and even try to leave no trace.
    3. +2
      18 June 2014 19: 02
      domokl
      hi
      I basically agree. But in the initial phase of the punitive operation, the radicals were also very necessary for the ideological reinforcement of the Ukrainian Army, which did not actively want to fight. They were needed to suppress the mood in the Army unnecessary for the Ukrainian regime and literally physically destroy the most disagreeing with the regime’s actions. Again, they served as the eye of the SBU (the army traditionally does not like intelligence services in any country). Their role was also great for intimidating anti-Maidan and isolating and destroying activists ... Here's how Odessa was intimidated .....
      Now, to some extent, Kiev still needs them ... But they cause justifiable fear .... And what to do with them later, the Ukrainian regime, it seems, doesn’t know itself .... after all, in the South-East they will not destroy everyone ... those who remain will gain a clear combat organization, experience, so to speak, will undergo combat coordination and gain resources with which they will be able to put any Ukrainian power on their ears.
      I’m not bloodthirsty, but I don’t know what to do with any Ukrainian authorities ... they cannot be re-educated ... nothing but destruction comes to mind ...
      Yeah, I forgot to say. that the battalions of the National Guard, in combination, are also personal gangs of the oligarchs. This is what they will always be needed for the property war.
      1. koshh
        +1
        18 June 2014 22: 44
        Yes, they have created all kinds of trash. Where will we bury so many people? Or, nevertheless, in a geyropu for re-education of the geyropeytsy. Let them bother with them.
    4. koshh
      0
      18 June 2014 22: 38
      Quote: domokl
      The second stage is usually a grave for most of them. With the help of an external enemy, a class or naivenoy struggle, etc. And the remaining ones are destroyed simply by repression.

      Definitely correct. Remember the October Revolution. Stalin destroyed the entire Lenin Guard as enemies of the people, and sent revolutionary sailors, in cocaine dope, to the front.
      1. 0
        19 June 2014 04: 08
        cocaine does not dope, but significantly improves performance
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. UFO
    +7
    18 June 2014 18: 45
    It turns out that different types of manure (pork, cat, chicken and cow) were mixed in one heap for biogas (explosive) and humus (fertilizers for land). lol Real fascist pragmatism! what
    1. 0
      18 June 2014 18: 59
      Quote: UFO
      It turns out that different types of manure (pork, cat, chicken and cow) were mixed in one heap for biogas (explosive) and humus (fertilizers for land). lol Real fascist pragmatism! what

      You have to be a foodie to understand the shades of shit. Seriously, the fighting allows you to absorb and destroy this scum.
  4. Evgeniy1
    +1
    18 June 2014 18: 54
    These are not even national radicals, these are BANDERLOGES and don’t go to Kipling!
    The monkeys, who have gone berserk with blood and impunity, are no longer monkeys, but not yet people, they just need to be PRESSED like KLOPOV, and puppeteer trainers should be identified and "neutralized" so that thousands of innocent PEOPLE are not sold!
  5. +2
    18 June 2014 19: 01
    Quote: herruvim
    then they will be destroyed as waste and unnecessary material

    Why then? When the legendary battalion commander of the "Donbass" battalion, Semyon Semyonchenko, who has already killed the personnel twice, is now recruiting a third on the "Maidan". So, not later, but now, the process is underway ...
    But doesn’t it remind you of the goat that leads the herd to the slaughterhouse, while leaving itself to the side?
    1. 0
      18 June 2014 19: 05
      Not only on the Maidan, women are already going to his battalion. And in the Rada today they voted to extend the term of military duty to 60 years.
  6. +1
    18 June 2014 19: 07
    Stable power in a dependent country that is constantly shying away from Russia to Europe is impossible. Until Ukraine finally leans against someone, there will be no stability. "Nezalezhnosti" in Ukraine for centuries has been just an unattainable dream.
  7. 0
    18 June 2014 19: 08
    Quote: herruvim
    National radicals are still needed, then they will be destroyed as waste and unnecessary material

    So already goes to the disassembly of organs. One youth-moving goods. am http://www.ukraina.ru
  8. 0
    18 June 2014 19: 21
    National for the sake of feces, ki I hate all this Bandera racket and already hate the word Ukraine
  9. 0
    18 June 2014 20: 00
    Gentlemen, professionals, how difficult is it to reset a pepper like Benito?
    1. +2
      18 June 2014 21: 02
      For professionals, it’s easy to multiply anyone by zero.
      Apparently not yet ordered ...
      Although, for lam green, someone goes for a dummy ...
      I think the bene is not long left ...
      1. 0
        19 June 2014 03: 50
        And who gives such orders, if not secret?
      2. 0
        19 June 2014 03: 50
        And who gives such orders, if not secret?
  10. 0
    18 June 2014 20: 04
    ukrruin clearly copies Germany from the time of the adi-possessed-assault battalions, national-radio-fakalia-can copy a lot of things in their own way, but only the bucket is not suitable for the role of the Fuhrer - this is simple meat for the slaughter, and the Fuhrer the owner will appoint later, when the blood is not shed it is waist-deep in it
  11. 0
    18 June 2014 20: 10
    Nickname "Cominternist" must be justified, why then all of Ukraine at once? At the expense of the riffraffs - I agree!
  12. 0
    18 June 2014 20: 37
    Dap Well scum divorced there !!!!
    And they can smash and kill the current ... they will be mostly "processed" (into a load of 200 ... at the front) ... or legalize (like riot police ... current for dissidents) ...
  13. 0
    18 June 2014 20: 49
    All these national radicals are something of themselves in the war against the militia, against the regular army they are nothing, they will flee immediately after a serious blow.
  14. 0
    18 June 2014 21: 08
    Interesting topic! They need to throw shit on the fan, so that these
    the anti-Mascals horses began to buss each other!
    I think it's not in vain that the KGB and SMERSH are created!
    Salo dropped!
    - To the heroes of the shroud!
  15. hotspur
    +1
    18 June 2014 21: 24
    Jewish voice of the "Right Sector" http://9tv.co.il/news/2014/06/18/178260.html

  16. 0
    18 June 2014 22: 42
    Quote: herruvim
    National radicals are still needed, then they will be destroyed as waste and unnecessary material

    It is important that they be destroyed before the abominations are done.
    They would be in an embryonic state on the molecule ....
  17. portoc65
    0
    18 June 2014 23: 32
    An analogy is being seen .. As in Nazi Germany, the Wehrmacht troops and the SS troops are ideological Nazis .. In Ukraine, the same army chip and the right sector are similar to the SS troops.
    1. hotspur
      -1
      18 June 2014 23: 58
      The analogy will be absolute if we remember that the NSDAP, in the early stages of the path to power, just like the "pravoseks" now, financed
    2. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    19 June 2014 04: 19
    I’ll get out of my skin, but I will live to see the moment when bracelets click on Kolomoisky’s rowers.
  19. 0
    19 June 2014 05: 52
    there are not many ideological Nazis, for the most part this is "stupid meat" which is used for the dirtiest work in the struggle for power. bully

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"