Panzer 61 / 68. Switzerland

15


A small but very proud country - Switzerland, has always been famous for its high-precision and high-tech production, as well as for its skilled specialists. It is especially surprising that the state has reached such an image of being a small, mountainous territory, tightly clamped on all sides by its neighbors and not even having access to the sea. In addition to Swiss watches, the region is also famous for its warlike inhabitants. A country that, in fact, did not participate in the last two world wars, is intensively preparing to repel external aggression. The cost of an army is colossal and far from a fact that they will come true, if a conflict actually happens, but at least the deterrent factor in 150 thousands of very combat-ready bayonets is working. Yes, it does not matter.

It is quite reasonable that when in the 50 of the last century many military worlds began to run around a new “toy” - the main battle tank, the Swiss also wanted this for themselves. But the war in Korea made its own adjustments and it was not possible to simply buy. Having bought, for wit, a portion of light French AMX-13, the country's leadership decided to make its own: better, faster, more powerful. In general, one that would fully satisfy the concept of a modern, at that time, MBT.

Initially, an order for MBT looked like this: weight about 30 tons, maximum speed - 50 km / h, gun caliber 90 mm, and the effective value of frontal armor - 150 mm. Serial production was supposed to start as early as 1956, and development itself was launched at 1953.

The first experimental tank appeared only by the 1958 year and was called KW.30, it was equipped with a modified 90 mm Swiss anti-tank gun and it was based on design solutions developed by the Indien Panzer. That is, the path from the sketch to the "iron" took 5 for many years. A total of two prototypes were built. A little later, Panzer 58 appeared on the arena, equipped with the same weapon and a twin 20 mm automatic cannon. The gun was designed to combat lightly armed targets. By 1959, the second Pz 58 prototype was finally approved as a promising model and aimed at further preproduction refinement. By the way, it was equipped with a Swiss modification of the British 20-foot (84mm) gun - PanzerKanone 58. The first small series of Panzer 58 in the number of 10 units produced in 1960 year.

Panzer 61 / 68. Switzerland
The first experienced KW30


The first prototype Pz58


The second prototype Pz58


Production version

The final result was not accepted by the acceptance, and development was continued, which ultimately resulted in a new machine - the Panzer 61. The new tank could boast a more powerful 105 mm British L7 gun (later licensed by its Swiss modification - PzKan-61). The rate of fire of the gun was 9 rounds per minute, and armor-piercing made it quite tolerable to deal with the potential enemy’s MBT. The twin gun was left, but later, in intermediate modifications, it was gradually abandoned, replacing the MG-7,5 machine gun with a 51 mm machine gun. Anti-aircraft weapons were also represented by a 7,5 mm machine gun, which operated loader, so that the commander was engaged only in their duties. And if attacking opportunities tank were on the level, then the protection of the crew is very, very unsatisfactory. The frontal armor of the tower is 120 mm, and the hull is only 60 mm, which, even by the standards of the Second World War, is not very serious. Moreover, the armor is homogeneous rolled, there are no metal-ceramics and other things. In fact, the Panzer 61 pierced any tank guns of that time, and the defense was bulletproof, anti-fragmentation and also helped against small-caliber guns. The Daimler-Benz V8 engine, which delivered 630 horsepower to the mountain, allowed the 39-ton tank to accelerate to 55 km / h. The crew was placed classically: the driver is in the front center, the commander with an arrow on the right of the tower and the loader on the left. The small turret did not allow placing ammunition in it, so all 52 shells were put in the hull. And, although the survivability of the equipment increased, the work of the loader was complicated. The suspension of the tank turned out to be interesting, it used belleville springs, sometimes called Bellville springs in foreign literature.


Panzer 61

The Swiss tank was nothing extraordinary; moreover, it was frankly weak compared to classmates, but nonetheless immediately became a symbol of national pride. A government order was received for 150 machines that were manufactured and delivered in parts from 1965 to 1966 a year, and served, after repeated upgrades, to 1996. It was not without complaints and problems, but, in general, the series turned out to be solid, which is hinted at by 30 years of service in parts. And even if any enemy could pierce him, but Pz61 was something to answer, and in the conditions of very rugged terrain, armor does not always play a decisive role. Although too lengthy term from drawing to the stocks has contributed. The tank, which was supposed to be one of the best in the world at the time of the start of development, was frankly late with the release. That is why, in an effort to somehow remedy the situation, the military immediately initiated the modernization of the fresh machine. The project was called Panzer 68.


Panzer 68

The main changes in the new design were wider tracks, a two-plane gun stabilizer, a ballistic computer, a gunner's night IR sight, the replacement of a paired 20 mm gun with a machine gun, 30 additional “horses”, 5 km to speed and a couple of tons of additional weight. The first prototype tanks were launched in the 1968 year, and production continued in four batches from 1971 to 1984. Total 400 made copies. The car was frankly an old candy in a new wrapper. Although the new fire control system and improved capabilities for detecting the enemy added combat power, the tank is outdated morally.

The novelty could "boast" a whole host of technical problems. The problems are so idiotic and unconvincing that the Swiss army tried to hide them from the public. And, instead of correcting the mistakes, they were successfully hushed up until the 1979 year, when the local popular weekly Weltwoche published an expose article. News shocked the public (and almost every man there is a military man and knows a lot), led to the terrible scandal and the resignation of the Defense Ministry Rudolf Gnezhi. The article described in detail the problems with 8 that had been in service for years as a tank, many of which were very dangerous, and all of them together made the vehicle unsuitable for combat in any of the hypothetical conflicts of the Cold War.


For example, for the sake of excitement, the Pz68 could not back up until it completely stopped. New gearbox "6 forward-6 back" did not allow this. And if this is the norm for city cars, it’s not for a combat vehicle. Many of the potential opponents of 68 were able to do this. For T-62 it was not difficult to pull back in the run, but the Swiss could not, which in battle could make life very difficult. Another problem is the lack of protection against weapons of mass destruction. The tank was not tight. Apply suddenly the enemy poisonous substances crews Pz68 would fall into a big mess. Of course, personal gas masks to some extent solved the question, but is it convenient to fight with a tank in a gas mask? Criticism caused ejector barrel. Powder gases persistently fell inside the fighting compartment, so that gas masks came in handy and without the impact of the enemy.

These shortcomings may seem childish, compared with the other two, truly unique and inherent only in the Swiss product. The first - the inclusion of the heater was able to cause spontaneous fire from the main gun. And all because the control circuit of the stove and the gun were on the same board. If the crew of the tank wanted to warm up, then this desire immediately made the car in front of you, much hotter. And even if there were no accidents, it was just the case. Be that as it may, the Swiss engineers made a “childish” mistake and no one warned her at the design stage. Of course, then everything was fixed, but over the years of operation for 8, they did not even think about it. The second, a radio station operating at maximum power, entered into a mysterious wave connection with the tower control unit and, while the connection was working, the turret was moving randomly, unpredictably and uncontrollably. Well, this fact for such a long combat service could at least intrigue the field crew, but no, everything is as it should be.


After careful analysis and appointment of several special commissions, only significant 50 problems were found, and the Minister of Defense finally admitted that the tank was not operational. It took several years of hard work "on the bugs" until the car was declared ready for service. All this, of course, was associated with considerable expenses and public discontent. The image of Switzerland as a manufacturer of military equipment also suffered greatly. When the neighbors found out about the fiasco, Austria, which planned to purchase 400 Pz68, immediately abandoned preliminary agreements in favor of the American М60 Patton, which did not move the towers using the radio, and did not shoot in the air if the crew suddenly froze. Switzerland itself decided to equip itself with new West German Leopard 2 and in the 80-x 68-s began to gradually withdraw to the reserve. Just when they were finally brought to mind. A curtain.

The only joy the leadership of Switzerland from owning its own MBT was the sale in the late 90-s of two hundred modernized Panzer 68 Thai army. The last tanks were written off and sent for scrap in 2005. Several cars have settled in museums and private collections. Many of them on the go.

In addition to tanks directly, 68-based Brückenpanzer 30 (used up to 68 of the year) and 2011 units of the Entremnungspanzer 69 BREM (in the 65 range) were developed and built on the basis of 2008. There were also prototypes of the 155 mm self-propelled Panzerkanone 68 and 35 mm Fliegerabwehrpanzer 68 anti-aircraft guns, but this technique was not allowed into the series.


Fliegerabwehrpanzer 68


Brückenpanzer 68


Entpannungspanzer 65


Panzerkanone 68


Sources used:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzer_61
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzer_68
http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=666
http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=668
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/28/swiss-tanks-part-1/
http://bronay.ru/bronetexnika-shvejcarii/swiss-tank-pz-61.html
http://bronay.ru/bronetexnika-shvejcarii/tank-pz-68.html
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    17 June 2014 09: 55
    This is what happens when, in the absence of tank building traditions, they immediately try to make "the best and unparalleled". It partly worked out ... laughing
    1. +2
      17 June 2014 11: 15
      A small but very proud country - Switzerland, has always been famous


      also by the fact that she was panicky afraid of the USSR and even developed her own program to create nuclear weapons ...
      but by the way ..

      on the topic .. The military-industrial complex of Switzerland has always issued good examples of WORLD level ... ,, Piranha and so on ...
      for tanks, this is a project of 80's NKPz, to replace the Panzer 61-68 ....
      The Swiss NKPz tank was similar in layout to the Israeli Merkava tank (but only in layout)))) ....
      he had the front location of the MTO ... it is a pity that this tank was not accepted for service and its mass production was not started ....
      later in Switzerland they established a licensed release of German "Leopard-2" ....
    2. +4
      17 June 2014 12: 00
      The influence of the T-54 will be noticeable in the tank construction of Switzerland. The shape of the tower is clearly inspired by the products of Soviet tank factories.
      I especially liked the reversing solution. The Swiss guards are not retreating. By extreme meore, the designers gave them the opportunity to change their mind and not let down the tradition)))
      1. +2
        17 June 2014 12: 14
        here in addition to the article, there is one more modernization of the Pz 61 tank with enhanced armor ....
        heavily frontal booking Pz 61, hull and turret ...
  2. +1
    17 June 2014 11: 13
    As for the stove, this is certainly cool, but why does Switzerland need tanks? they want cheese or chocolate better.
    1. +1
      17 June 2014 12: 01
      But what to take from bankers? Ssy.kuny they all.
      1. +1
        17 June 2014 14: 45
        Quote: Standard Oil
        Switzerland is not a Great Power

        I posted ... hypertrophied RUSSOPHOBIA (USSR))))

        Quote: qwert
        But what to take from bankers? Ssy.kuny they all.

        I don’t know what to take from the bankers ... but Swiss engineers have created two world-class armored personnel carriers on the GSh M113, for the "Piranha" wheeled armored personnel carrier ...

        we have such an armored personnel carrier (Boomerang)) is still under development !!!

        such APCs, such as VBCI APCs from NEXTER Boxer and Piranha V, have enhanced ballistic and mine protection ....
    2. Kassandra
      0
      18 June 2014 00: 28
      for flank counterattacks from mountain fortifications to the valley between the Alps and Jura mountains
  3. Nightcrawler
    +1
    17 June 2014 12: 01
    Looking at the photo at the beginning of the article, I thought it was Indien-Panzer. But then I realized that I was wrong
  4. +1
    17 June 2014 12: 20
    The tank is similar to modern Chinese cars: the designers also tried very hard to make a good tank, but really, they had never made tanks before. He would go into production in the late 50s - would be a great tank.
  5. +1
    17 June 2014 12: 26
    All the same, it’s not enough to have technology, experience decides.
  6. Georgich
    +1
    17 June 2014 12: 49
    We wanted to play adult games. Actually, there wasn’t much motivation either, so PR, amusement of pride. We’re doing a watch, but we’ll spit the tank.
    1. Kassandra
      0
      18 June 2014 00: 24
      anti-aircraft guns bought everything from them
  7. +3
    17 June 2014 12: 58
    The first tanks in the service of Switzerland were the French Renault FT-17. In 1922, they were purchased as test samples for subsequent tests (It is worth adding that three more such machines were purchased in 1939).

    In 1934, Switzerland bought six Vickers Carden Loyd M 1934 wedges. They armed the gendarmerie battalion of the armed forces. Operation of these vehicles in mountainous conditions has shown that it is preferable for Switzerland to have light, passable tanks.

    At the end of the thirties, the Czech Škoda sold 24 LTH light tanks to the Swiss. The tanks were upgraded specifically for use in mountainous conditions. They were equipped with a diesel engine "Saurer" ST1, 125 hp. and they were armed with a 24mm Oerlikon M.38 cannon and two 8mm Maxim M.38 machine guns, manufactured in Switzerland. Named Pzw. 39 they went into service with the tank companies of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd light brigades.

    On the basis of LTH, the Swiss made several experimental self-propelled guns, for example with an 105-mm gun, but they did not go into the series.

    In 1944-1945, Switzerland also made attempts to create its own NK II assault gun based on the German StuG III based on LTH, but with the end of the war, work in this direction was stopped due to the loss of relevance of the task of producing armored vehicles on their own.
    And in 1940, the French presented an unexpected gift to the Swiss. After Germany was defeated by France, part of the forces of the French 45 corps retreated to Swiss territory. Here they interned. Switzerland confiscated 12 R-35 from the broken French. Tanks called, Lpz35, were transferred to the arsenal of the Swiss army.
    1. +3
      17 June 2014 13: 16
      In the post-war period, Switzerland showed interest in purchasing the Hetzer self-propelled guns on the LT vz.38 chassis, whose export option was the LTH. In this regard, the Swiss army again turned to Czechoslovakia to purchase armored vehicles.
      The design of the self-propelled guns has undergone some improvements in accordance with the requirements of the Swiss army and in July 1946 the first prototype of the Swiss Hetzer was tested. At the suggestion of Skoda, Switzerland on 15 on August 1946 of the year ordered a trial batch of 8 Hetzer. The party was made by Skoda from the backlog left from Wehrmacht orders and self-propelled gun tests carried out in Switzerland in the 1947 year, including in the highlands in the Interlaken region, completely satisfied the Swiss military, who accepted it for the Swiss army under the designation G-13 .
      In November 1946, a contract was signed for the supply of 100 G-13. Self-propelled guns were delivered to Switzerland in four batches of 25 vehicles shipped on 29 of April, 28 of July, in October and 20 of December 1947 of the year. Since the PaK 39 / 2 guns needed to complete the order were not available, the Skoda had to adapt the PaK 13 anti-tank guns for installation in the G-40. In comparison with the German and Czechoslovak versions, the G-13 was made a number of other changes, including those aimed at increasing the service life of self-propelled guns, originally created for wartime and designed only for relatively short use.
      Also, G-13 instead of gasoline engines were equipped with diesel engines manufactured by the Swiss company Zaurer. In 1947, Switzerland issued an additional order for the 50 G-13, bringing the total number of Swiss Hetzer to 158. Of the ordered vehicles, 12 were dispatched by Skoda in September, 18 in November of 1948 of the year, and the last 20 only in February 16 of 1950 of the year, although some sources indicate that the last self-propelled guns were transferred to Switzerland only in the 1952 year.

      In addition to the Czechoslovak "Hetzers" in 1952-1954, Switzerland bought 200 light tanks AMX-13 from France under the designation Light Tank 51 (Leichter Panzer 51). AMX-13 served in tank battalions until 1961, and then were transferred to reconnaissance battalions until they were decommissioned in 1980.

      In 1962-64 in France, 4 105-mm self-propelled howitzers on the AMX-13 chassis were purchased for testing; however, the purchase did not take place.

      In the UK, 300 tanks "Centurion" were purchased, which are currently removed from service and replaced by the "Leopard-2".
      1. +3
        17 June 2014 16: 12
        These AMX-13 were in the Israeli army. And even in the midst of battle.
        They were elusive, like the Elusive Joe from the anecdote: "elusive because
        nobody needs ... x. "I mean, they were mobile and were not knocked out,
        but they were not able to knock anyone out either. And they were thrown out.

        Unlike the Centurions, which turned out to be the peak of British tank building
        for all time. The centurions did not fuss, stood and fired from great distances:
        the first projectile sighting - the second hit, 105 mm CS gave confident
        penetration at any hit.
        1. +2
          17 June 2014 16: 53
          Alexey is not so simple ...
          On June 6, on the Sinai front, at dusk the battalion of light tanks AMX-13 from the Aviram brigade was far ahead on the road to Ismail when he met with two Egyptian T-54 battalions. Several Israeli tanks and half-tracked armored personnel carriers were lost in minutes, although the T-54 suffered losses from flank attacks. The 75-mm gun AMX-13 was almost useless against the frontal armor of the T-54. Israeli tanks retreated. On the same day, on the Jordanian front, most of the 2-th Jordanian tank battalion in the Nablus region was squeezed between the two Israeli tank battalions of Roma. During the battle, the battalion of the Jordanian Patton was almost defeated, one of the AMX-13 destroyed the 7 M48 tanks.

          http://btvt.narod.ru/2/6d0.htm



          1. +2
            17 June 2014 19: 35
            Thanks for the interesting photos. In addition to the museum in Latrun, I did not see the AMX.
            The Jordanians were defeated by tactics and
            trained, the M-48 was not a luxury, of course, but not worse than the AMX.
        2. 0
          17 June 2014 18: 45
          Quote: voyaka uh
          t Centurions, which turned out to be the peak of British tank building
          for all time. The centurions did not fuss, stood and fired from great distances:
          first projectile sighting - second hit, 105 mm K

          PZ.VI (T-6) "TIGER" (captured in S. Africa from Rommel))), in turn, had a huge impact on the developers of "Centurion" ....
          the ideology of creating the "Tiger" good armor ... excellent optics and a long-range and high-precision 88 mm gun, ((was developed by Friedrich Krupp AG using an anti-aircraft gun 88 mm ... Flak 18/36 - the famous "acht-acht")) ), well, t / d ...

          and of course thanks to the excellent gun L-7, 105 mm "Centurion" ...
          and the number of delivered to Israel amounted to 1100 units ... "Centurions" of various modifications ...
          but of course ... as without the help of the United States ... in 1967, the modernization of tanks by replacing engines, on AVDS-1790-2AS "Teledine Continental", as well as replacing the mechanical transmission "Merrit-Brown" with the hydromechanical "Allison" CD- 850-6 ... well, and other "minor" alterations ...
          1. +3
            17 June 2014 19: 31
            The tiger was taken as a heavily armored concept
            long-range tank. The idea of ​​security and range
            prevailed over mobility.
            But, constructively, the Centurion was a development of the Comet (tank
            did not have time to fight in the 2nd World War), and that - the development of Cromwell,
            not too lucky.
            Centurion had an unprecedentedly high reputation in Israel,
            more than Merkava now. When they decided to write them off at the end
            80s, there were almost riots of tankers: "we don't want the Pattons, don't
            want Merkava ... ".
          2. Kassandra
            0
            18 June 2014 00: 18
            The ideology of the tiger was simply to make this anti-aircraft gun self-propelled, since it was she who saved German tanks from the KV and T-1941 throughout 34
            Panther was a much more dangerous tank.
            1. +1
              18 June 2014 11: 32
              Compare the armor of the sides of the Tiger and Panther and
              You will understand the difference between these tanks.
              If simplified:
              Panther is a tank destroyer. Powerful forehead and
              cardboard board. And the Tiger is a mobile long-range bunker,
              comfortable for the crew. If you look at the statistics,
              many Tigers were shot down, but most of the tankers from
              "heavy tank battalions" survived to old age.
              In Israel, it is the concept of the Tiger, embodied in good
              Centurions proved themselves, led to the creation of Merkava.
              1. Kassandra
                0
                19 June 2014 03: 49
                Compare the gun.
                The Panther was made from the Tiger, putting a specialized anti-tank, and loosening the reservation so that she could travel anywhere.
                the tank destroyer was the British "Archer" with about the same gun.
                BMP prototype was a BMP on which they strengthened the reservation and put a kcal gun.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  8. +1
    17 June 2014 13: 41
    Cool smile And I did not know that Switzerland had its own tanks.
    1. +1
      17 June 2014 16: 02
      Out of my heart, I always believed that the guarantee of the sovereignty of Switzerland, its banks. More precisely, the military-economic potential of those states whose ruling elites keep their capital in Swiss banks, well, the Vatican protectorate. But no "belligerent Swiss "-that's a more terrible thing than a nuclear baton." Bravo to the author !!! Regarding tanks, Switzerland found itself in a rather difficult situation. , and in many respects the conditions for their use. Now the transport system of the country allowed the use of only light vehicles with an appropriate level of security, the importance of which, in conditions of mountainous "crampedness" became key. booking average. Of course, miracles do not happen, booking is "hard" differentiated, the booked volume is minemal. Conditions of those tasks (limiting MG X) are very similar to traditional for the Soviet tank school, therefore, in my opinion, the result of the work of the Swiss is somewhat reminiscent of products from the USSR. Roads in modern Switzerland are not much different from the rest of Europe (fruits of European standardization) and the need for a tank "exclusive" has disappeared ...
      1. Kassandra
        +1
        18 June 2014 00: 05
        An extensive network of art bunkers, just dial the swiss army bunker on youtube.
        cans are cracked
  9. +2
    17 June 2014 13: 57
    Novel 1977 Today, 12:58 New
    The first tanks in the service of Switzerland were the French Renault FT-17. In 1922 they were purchased as test samples for subsequent tests (It is worth adding that in 1939 three more such machines were purchased


    Well, I don’t know what to say. Marshal of the armored forces laughing they apparently had a large original in the 39th.
    1. Kassandra
      0
      18 June 2014 00: 06
      like wedges to protect the runway of airfields from landing
  10. Nightcrawler
    +1
    17 June 2014 15: 25
    The influence of the T-54 will be noticeable in the tank construction of Switzerland. The shape of the tower is clearly inspired by the products of Soviet tank factories.

    In my opinion this is a modified Lowe tank turret.
  11. +1
    17 June 2014 18: 02
    Do not forget that Switzerland is one of the first countries in the world in terms of the number of weapons in the hands of the population! That is, neutrality is neutrality but powder is kept dry hi
    1. Kassandra
      0
      18 June 2014 00: 12
      first one. everyone’s army is at home there, so that they can’t be captured by a landing party
  12. Everest2014
    +2
    17 June 2014 19: 56
    Objects 277..279 could eat these tanks for breakfast, one friend who loved corn did not approve of them - it was a sunset of heavy tanks, which at that moment were ready for a nuclear war (well, somehow ready).
  13. Alexanderdorf
    0
    18 June 2014 16: 22
    The armor is good))
  14. 0
    18 June 2014 21: 00
    good article! stove delivered)
  15. 0
    12 August 2014 23: 50
    Thanks to the author - informative! Well, of course, the incidents were also impressive :) I did not expect such mistakes in a very revered country, not only banks, but also gunsmiths ...
    1. Kassandra
      0
      13 August 2014 03: 43
      doubtful. it was just that the tank had to be beaten up so that the locals wouldn’t have too much against buying German ones.