Israeli hybrid robot for particularly dangerous missions carrying capacity 1,2 tons

33
The new hybrid multi-purpose vehicle (Hybrid Multipurpose Vehicle, HMV) from G-Nius is designed to perform surveillance and reconnaissance, internal security tasks and special operations. The hybrid multi-purpose car will be available in two versions - fully electric or hybrid. In both cases, the payload is up to 1,2 tons.

At the Eurosatory 2014 exhibition in Paris, the Israeli company G-Nius, specializing in land robotics, will present its latest development of an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV). The new hybrid multi-purpose vehicle is designed to perform surveillance and reconnaissance, internal security tasks and special operations. The hybrid multi-purpose car will be available in two versions - fully electric or hybrid. Both options will use an electric drive that provides a high level of maneuverability with a low level of acoustic visibility, increased survivability and secrecy. The hybrid version will also include an integral diesel engine, allowing the car to travel long distances while charging its battery.

Israeli hybrid robot for particularly dangerous missions carrying capacity 1,2 tons

The new hybrid multi-purpose car from G-Nius will be available in two versions - fully electric or hybrid. In both cases, the payload is up to 1,2 tons. The car at the Eurosatory exhibition with a remotely controlled combat module production Elbit Systems. Photo: G-Nius


The platform architecture allowed the G-Nius designers to focus on the vehicle as a robotic platform, rather than converting a human-driven vehicle into Robot, thus not dealing with unnecessary structural elements - cab, transmission, etc. As a platform, HMV uses a low-profile electric vehicle with high cross-country ability. Various sensors are natively built into the original vehicle configuration, while the robotic controls interact directly with the vehicle's systems, eliminating the need for the typical suite of applications used to "robotize" existing vehicles.

"The solutions we present here offer opportunities based on practical experience gained over seven years, which is equivalent to 60 000 man-hours," commented G-Nius CEO Yoav Hirsh.

While the HMV G-Nius is positioned as a means to perform specific tasks, there are great prospects in the field of conversion of part of the existing military fleet into optional robotic vehicles. This trend can be a huge market potential for innovative companies in the field of robotics - such as G-Nius. These capabilities led the company to develop its own robotic control suite (robotic control suite), which was implemented on the HMV and the latest versions of the robotic border security vehicle. The main unit of this robotic control set is placed in a compact module that can be installed in any vehicle, thus transforming the human-controlled platform into an automatic mode. Thus, the set allows any land transport platform to become an unmanned vehicle, without endangering personnel and saving human resources.


The robotic set includes an on-board computer, a navigation unit, a power distribution system, video and audio control functions are grouped into a single integrated "main unit", coupled with external sensors and a communication system. Photo: G-Nius.


The system can be easily installed, it is able to withstand harsh operating conditions and an extreme temperature range, allowing troops to convert part of their fleet into unmanned vehicles.

“A hybrid multi-purpose vehicle and a robotic kit multiply the capabilities of any unmanned ground platform; we are witnessing interest in these solutions from various organizations around the world,” Hirsch added.

Robotic vehicles help save the lives of soldiers without exposing them to mines, IEDs and enemy fire. At the expense of safer driving, they also help to avoid non-combat losses of personnel. For such tasks, outdated wheeled and tracked vehicles, such as the HMMWV and M-113, can be converted into unmanned robotic platforms. These robotic vehicles will perform specific tasks that would require new cars, taking into account their entire life cycle, including a significant amount of personnel and services. According to expert estimates, unmanned systems that allow reuse of decommissioned obsolete platforms will become more accessible, require significantly fewer personnel for their use and maintenance, and at least as reliable as manned platforms.

The robotic control set is already integrated on a new border patrol car, converted from Ford F350 (video below), which will soon replace the Guardium Mk I and II, used by Tsakhalem to patrol the border with Gaza. Recently, Guardium was also sent to patrol the Lebanese border.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    16 June 2014 11: 02
    Hmm ... Scientific and technological revolution in ACTION ... !!!
  2. 0
    16 June 2014 12: 25
    In my opinion, he lacks a module with a 40mm grenade launcher and some kind of machine gun module.
    1. Maksim...
      +1
      16 June 2014 12: 46
      Well, fastening something to him is not so long. After all, more than a ton of carrying capacity.
    2. +1
      16 June 2014 13: 44
      Quote: Fibrizio
      In my opinion, he lacks a module with a 40mm grenade launcher and some kind of machine gun module.

      Look at the first photo, there is such a module.
      1. 0
        16 June 2014 19: 53
        Quote: professor
        Look at the first photo, there is such a module.

        Browning 12,7, look at the machine gun belt ...

        Russian
        Reconnaissance and strike robot system RURS

        apparently there is a reservation ...
        1. 0
          16 June 2014 21: 03
          Quote: cosmos111
          Browning 12,7, look at the machine gun belt ...

          Here is the armament of another car of the same company.

          1. 0
            16 June 2014 21: 21
            Quote: professor
            Here is the armament of another car of the same company.

            the chassis and weapons can be different .. the main thing is the "brains" of the robotic complex and the software ...

            in the USSR, for the first time robotic combat systems were used to eliminate the consequences of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station ....
            and this is in 1986..1987 years !!!



            Robot STR-1 performing work at Chernobyl
            1. 0
              16 June 2014 21: 25
              Quote: cosmos111
              and this is in 1987 year !!!

              In my opinion, a remotely controlled tank was created in the USSR even earlier. Lunokhod will not remember ...
              1. 0
                16 June 2014 21: 45
                Quote: professor
                a remotely controlled tank was created in the USSR even earlier. Lunokhod will not remember ...

                STR-1 or Klin-2 is precisely a robotic complex ...

                why remember, because we are behind in the development of robotic systems from Israel, years at least 20, although in the 80-x in the USSR ahead of ....

                the platform where the equipment that took part in the liquidation of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident is shown ... there is not only STR-1 ...
                1. 0
                  16 June 2014 21: 59
                  here's another topic ...
                  In 1984-1986, the analysis and processing of algorithms for controlling the movement of the robot in a natural environment was continued on the prototype MAVR. This work was ordered by the USSR Ministry of Defense and was aimed at creating an autonomous robot capable of moving in a complex uneven environment. Unique design solutions provided MAVR with high maneuverability and reliable protection of control circuits located inside barrel-shaped wheels.
                  : http: //dnipt.irtc.org.ua/en/history.html
                  MAVR robot.... robot sapper ...
                2. +1
                  17 June 2014 06: 33
                  Quote: cosmos111

                  STR-1 or Klin-2 is precisely a robotic complex ...

                  Robotic - yes. But not a robot. It was a radio-controlled system at a speed of 1 km per hour. A good system for its time and an interesting operating time. But it was not designed to work in automatic mode
        2. 0
          17 June 2014 04: 20
          Quote: cosmos111
          apparently there is a reservation ...

          I see tin sheets on a tubular frame in the photo, and spot welding between them. request
  3. 0
    16 June 2014 15: 15
    Finally, after painful decades of trial and error, Israel was able to set up production of cars on the radio.
    1. +2
      16 June 2014 15: 29
      Quote: quilted jacket
      Finally, after painful decades of trial and error, Israel was able to set up production of cars on the radio.

      If they knew how to read, and not just look at the pictures, they would probably see the word "robotic".
      1. -6
        16 June 2014 15: 52
        Well, I wrote (the operator is present) a radio-controlled car.
        Artificial intelligence does not exist yet.
        So either by GPS or the operator, and at worst, by the beacons along the wall in Israel.
        1. +2
          16 June 2014 15: 59
          Quote: quilted jacket
          Well, I wrote (the operator is present) a radio-controlled car.

          The operator is optional for decision making and weapon use. It is really radio controlled. The movement along the route is robotic, in case of obstacles the "model" overcomes them independently. Beacons are not reported.

          Quote: quilted jacket
          Artificial intelligence does not exist yet.

          It seems that not everyone has natural intelligence.
          1. -5
            16 June 2014 16: 10
            Come on, the operator sits and steers like in a toy.


            It seems that not everyone has natural intelligence.

            Professor, do not be so self-critical. We have not yet seen from you an article about the top of the development of Israeli intelligence and technological level - EPILATOR.
            1. +1
              16 June 2014 16: 19
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Come on, the operator sits and steers like in a toy.

              As I understand it, you yourself know everything. I will not then be more disturbing.
              hi
          2. +2
            16 June 2014 16: 18
            Quote: professor
            The operator is optional for decision making and weapon use. It is really radio controlled. The movement along the route is robotic, in case of obstacles the "model" overcomes them independently. Beacons are not reported.

            And what is the approximate cost of the control unit and is there a traffic permit in automatic mode in settlements?
            1. +1
              16 June 2014 16: 25
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              And what is the approximate cost of the control unit and is there a traffic permit in automatic mode in settlements?

              There are no permits for automatic movement on public roads - legislation however. In California, they are trying to change this legislation.
              I don’t know about the exact price, but they write here that it is lower than the price of creating pilot systems.
              Does Unmanned Make Unacceptable? Exploring the Debate on using Drones and Robots in Warfare

              PS
              I saw this papelats last week on the road, but only as a transported item.
              1. +1
                16 June 2014 20: 16
                Robot (semi-autonomous combat system) Guardium UGV, the first serial combat robot ...
                Guardium UGV robot (semi-autonomous combat system), developed by Israel Aerospace Industries and Elbit Systems, is being tested at the border of the Gaza Strip ...
                300 kg payload ... DOUBM only within this weight ..
              2. +2
                16 June 2014 21: 26
                Quote: professor
                I saw this papelats last week on the road, but only as a transported item.

                In my opinion, a manipulator of the "hand" type suggests itself, three meters s in an unfolded position with a video camera, perhaps better than a telescopic rod, but this is a question to be solved.
  4. +1
    16 June 2014 15: 38
    I hope that the weapon, this "shaitan arba" will be controlled by the operator, I would not want the robot to decide who to live and who to die. Judging by the photo, the computer is not overly powerful, but the intelligence program is probably ........, the Americans still have everything at the development stage. Has Israel still created an operating system? well, let's say uh "kibbutz xl", it seems Israel is ready for this.
    1. MACCABI TLV
      +4
      17 June 2014 00: 32
      Quote: Free Wind
      Judging by the photo, the computer is not super powerful,

      oh, and teach me to identify by photo. belay
  5. Dart_Veyder
    0
    16 June 2014 16: 28
    They put trophies on him, otherwise the car looks very unprotected for pets.
    1. +4
      16 June 2014 16: 29
      Quote: Dart_Veyder
      They put trophies on him, otherwise the car looks very unprotected for pets.

      Trophy will be more expensive than this all-terrain vehicle.
    2. MACCABI TLV
      +1
      17 June 2014 00: 30
      Quote: Dart_Veyder
      They put trophies on him, otherwise the car looks very unprotected for pets.

      The car is not inhabited, who is there to protect with active protection?
  6. +4
    16 June 2014 16: 41
    As far as I am aware, the main control mode is remote automated, but with the possibility of switching to fully automatic and autonomous control in case of failures or suppression of data exchange channels between the robot and the control center. At the same time, tasks in the autonomous control mode can vary in a wide range (from assessing the situation and searching for safe ways of withdrawing the "mechanism" to engaging in battle and self-destruction), Everything is determined by what the user will program it for and what is more important for the user in each given situation : to preserve "every zhelyazyaka" or to preserve the lives of people whom this piece of iron covers. From the point of view of the modern level of hardware and software, nothing is impossible in this regard.
    Of course, the presence of a huge number of poorly protected sensors that stick out on this robot from everywhere, there are some doubts about the combat stability of the mechanism, but on the other hand, given that it is intended to act mainly against a relatively weakly armed enemy, it is possible even with such "junkies" he will be able to carry out his tasks (until they shoot).
    1. MACCABI TLV
      +1
      17 June 2014 00: 38
      Quote: gregor6549
      Considering that it is intended to act mainly against a relatively weakly armed enemy,

      The new hybrid multi-purpose vehicle is designed to carry out surveillance and reconnaissance, internal security tasks and special operations.
    2. +2
      17 June 2014 02: 07
      "Everything is determined by what the user programs it for" ///

      That's for sure! There was a bike here, that such an unmanned patroller is about
      Gaza rammed a maintenance machine that repairs and checks
      electronic fence. The robot saw her in the camera, but the program did not register
      him what to do if "friend" is on a collision course. And the operator gape.
      The crazy soldiers were buzzing like crazy, not realizing that
      there is no one to buzz! At the last moment turned off the road, but they still
      caught on the sides. So programming is a delicate matter lol
  7. Engineer
    0
    17 June 2014 11: 37
    70 years have passed ....
  8. Engineer
    0
    17 June 2014 11: 46
    For the installation of missile and artillery weapons (RAV), this chassis is not entirely suitable ... In addition, it is not clear where it can be shoved into the organizational and staff structure (OSH) of the motorized rifle battalion (SME) .... The block shown in the photo is not about gives a lot of insight .... Below is the composition and the scheme of information interaction of a promising ground reconnaissance and fire mobile robotic complex (RTO) of the incoming composition of the tactical fire units of SMEs with the RTO of the OMSBR ....
    1. +1
      17 June 2014 15: 46
      "organizational and staff structure (OSHS) of a motorized rifle battalion (MSB)" ///

      ABOUT! You look far. We start with the simplest: standalone
      patrolling drones borders.
      In an infantry battalion, even without any robots, simply with the introduction of a general informational "digital" picture of the battle, there are considerable problems. And not in technology or schemes - in people.
      The fact that you need not only to run, pull the trigger and yell into the radio, but also look at the screen on your forearm ... is difficult to learn. But on the screen can be useful infa from any UAV, such as:
      stop "people, there is an ambush in front of you, stop !!!"
  9. Engineer
    0
    17 June 2014 11: 51
    Option OShS with MRK SMB OMSBR (for more details, you can read "Development of a reconnaissance and fire system of SMB with MRK" (p. 96-116) here - http://rusfolder.com/40591791) ....
  10. Engineer
    +1
    17 June 2014 12: 02
    and more ... the Israeli company G-Nius showed the central control unit of the robot, which, when examined carefully, includes a navigation system (visible GPS connector). However, for any autonomous (I emphasize) ground-based reconnaissance and fire mobile robotic complex (RTO), an autonomous navigation system (ANS) is required .... ANS is the heart of any AUTONOMOUS RTOs .... The photo shows the ANS, which has the ability not only autonomous driving an RTO, but it also works with a fire control system (LMS) of a missile-artillery armament (RAV) hosted by an RTO .... In addition, data from .... is also being sent to the ASN (well, see the block diagram above). ANS is shown in the flowchart as a gyro cursor ... :)))))))))))))))
  11. waggish
    0
    7 July 2014 17: 19
    It is good that we are actively cooperating with them !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  12. 0
    3 October 2014 02: 39
    Of course, robotic systems are not perfect yet! There was an article, like a robot in a laboratory, shot its creators, and finished shooting. only having used up all the ammunition! In the Top Gir show, a car was shown that not only tracks the movement of the car in front, braking without the participation of the driver, but also determines the signals of traffic lights and pedestrians. So, it all depends on the software, and the systems that allow this robotic complex to identify obstacles and look for ways to get around them. The program was shown on American television. about completely independent cars. which, according to the navigation system, had to independently pass from one point to another, determining not only the asphalt road, but also the ground cover, and the presence of barriers, and their position. Plus, movement in the city, and the presence of obstacles, in the form of cars, and the same robotic systems, with parking and subsequent movement. It was not without fun, one rammed the wall of the house, the other two collided without dividing the road. The speed of course left much to be desired, but we must not forget that these are only the first steps in this area. As far as I remember, in the liquidation of the accident at the power unit, it was not robot complexes that took part, but remote-controlled devices. Electronics with hard radiation breaks down very quickly due to breakdown, but the relay circuits are resistant to radiation.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"