Modern anti-guerrilla aircraft. Part 2

68 553 54


The global war on "international terrorism" that began in the 21st century has greatly fueled interest in light "counter-insurgency" attack aircraft. Many countries have begun work on creating new and adapting existing training, light transport and agricultural aircraft for strike purposes.

One of the most interesting vehicles of this designation is the currently undergoing South African light reconnaissance-strike combat aircraft - AHRLAC (Advanced High Performance Reconaissance Light Aircraft).


AHRLAC reconnaissance and strike aircraft


This two-seater aircraft is 10,5 m long and has a wingspan of 12 m and is powered by a Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-66 turboprop engine producing 950 hp. The distinctive feature of this high-wing aircraft is its forked tail and a pusher propeller, which is located at the rear of the fuselage.

With a takeoff weight of about 4000 kg, the planned combat load weight placed on six suspension nodes should be more than 800 kg. A 20-mm cannon is used as a built-in weapon. The lower part of the aircraft's fuselage is designed as a "conformal container" for placing quickly replaceable versions of various equipment.

With a full combat load, the aircraft should have a takeoff distance of 550 m. The maximum speed of the aircraft will be about 500 km/h, the ceiling - 9500 m, and the flight range - 2100 km with a full internal fuel supply (it is also possible to use two external tanks). The duration of patrol in the air should reach 7,5 - 10 hours.



The AHRLAC is a vehicle of the increasingly popular "manned UAV" concept and is designed to solve a wide range of tasks of reconnaissance, surveillance, patrolling, and striking ground targets in the context of counterinsurgency warfare. This concept involves the creation of a light attack aircraft, the cost of operation of which is comparable to the cost of operation of a drones middle class. At the same time, the time of patrolling in the air and the capabilities of reconnaissance, surveillance and remote data transmission equipment should be appropriate or even better than that of unmanned aerial vehicles.

A characteristic feature of counterinsurgency aircraft created recently is the installation of navigation, search and reconnaissance and communications equipment on them, allowing them to operate at any time of day and night, as well as broadcast video images received from cameras in real time. In terms of weapons, the emphasis has begun to be placed on guided high-precision munitions.


The Cessna AC-208 Combat Caravan, a light counterinsurgency aircraft developed by Alliant Techsystems, fully meets these qualities. The aircraft was developed under a contract with the US government to re-equip the Iraqi Air Force. It is based on the single-engine turboprop general-purpose aircraft Cessna 208 Grand Caravan.

Modern anti-guerrilla aircraft. Part 2

Cessna AC-208 Combat Caravan


Avionics of this aircraft allows you to perform tasks of specific optoelectronic aerial reconnaissance and use high-precision aviation means of destruction. It includes: a small-sized digital computing device, an optoelectronic system (a color early warning camera, an infrared camera, a laser range finder and a laser target designator), an 18-inch tactical situation indicator, color LCD displays, data transmission line equipment for ground command posts, VHF radio station, etc.

The aircraft with a takeoff weight of 3 kg is equipped with an economical Pratt & Whitney Canada PT629A-6A turboprop engine with a power of 114 hp. Patrol time in the air is about 675 hours. Maximum speed is about 4,5 km/h. Operation from unpaved runways of at least 350 meters is possible.



This aircraft, which has been in operation since 2009, implements the concept of an airborne command and reconnaissance post with the ability to carry out independent high-precision strikes if necessary. weapons.



Two types of weapons are used as weapons. missiles AGM-114M/K Hellfire air-to-ground missiles are mounted on underwing pylons. The cockpit is equipped with ballistic panels to protect the crew from small arms fire. Iraqi officials say the guided weapons are needed to prevent collateral damage during airstrikes against insurgents.


In 2009, the AT-802U light attack aircraft was presented at the Paris Air Show. The aircraft was created on the basis of the American two-seat agricultural aircraft AT-802 Air Tractor, produced since 1993. With a takeoff weight of 7257 kg, the aircraft develops a speed of up to 370 km/h. The Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-67F engine with a capacity of 1600 hp. The total capacity of the fuel system provides the ability to patrol for over 10 hours.


AT-802U


It differs from the basic version of the AT-802U by armoring the engine and the pilot's cockpit, a protected fuel tank and a reinforced fuselage and wings design. The AT-802U armament and special equipment complex was designed and installed by IOMAX specialists (Muresville, North Carolina).



Under the wing there are six suspension assemblies for weapon placement. Suspension of NAR and bombs weighing up to 500 pounds (226 kg) is possible. Containers with GAU-19 / A "Gatling" caliber 12,7-mm are used as machine gun armament. The total weight of weapons can reach 4000 kg.

To employ air-to-ground laser-guided missiles such as the AGM-114M Hellfire II and DAGR (Direct Attack Guided Rocket), the aircraft is equipped with the AN/AAQ 33 Sniper-XR optoelectronic sighting system from Lockheed Martin, operating in the visible and IR ranges. The system will allow the crew to search, detect, recognize and automatically track ground (surface) targets at ranges of 15-20 km in any weather conditions and time of day, their laser illumination and guidance of guided aircraft weapons.

The aircraft is equipped with a secure communications link that allows for real-time image transmission. The aircraft is equipped with a missile launch warning system with automatic release of "heat traps" and AAR-47/ALE-47 electronic countermeasures.



The Air Tractor AT-802U aircraft successfully passed field trials in Colombia, operating against local left insurgents and cocaine drug barons. Under the 2009 contract of the year, 24 vehicles were delivered to the UAE and six more Air Tractor AT-802U as an observation aircraft must be delivered to Jordan. The governments of Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen are also showing interest in this car.


The American company IOMAX, which previously developed the weapons system for the Air Tractor AT-802U reconnaissance and attack aircraft, is currently working on creating a similar reconnaissance and attack aircraft based on the Thrush 710 aircraft from Thrush Aircraft, a manufacturer of agricultural aircraft from Albany, Georgia, which competes with Air Tractor. The combat aircraft developed on the basis of the Thrush 710 received the designation Archangel (Block 3) Border Patrol Aircraft (BPA), and has been developed by IOMAX since November 2012.


Аrchangel BPA


The Air Tractor AT-802 and Thrush 710 are variants of virtually the same aircraft, designed by Leland Snow in the 1950s, the appearance and characteristics of both machines are very close. The Thrush 710 has a slightly higher (by 35 km/h) speed at altitude, and provides a slightly better ratio of the weight of weapons and fuel supply. The Archangel with a takeoff weight of 6715 kg has a cruising speed of 324 km/h at a range of 2500 km.

The aircraft can carry up to 12 AGM-114 Hellfire missiles, up to 16 70mm Cirit laser-guided rockets, and up to six Paveway II/III/IV or JDAM guided missiles on its six underwing hardpoints.

The Archangel BPA is equipped with a container with an electron-optical turret manufactured by FLIR Systems, an electronic intelligence system and a synthetic aperture radar. A double cabin with a tandem crew arrangement is equipped with three 6-inch color multifunction indicators for the pilot in the front cabin, and one 6-inch and one 12-inch indicators (for surveillance and targeting systems) indicators for the operator in the rear cabin. The cabin has dual controls.



Unlike the AT-802U, which is more intended for close air support and counter-insurgency missions using unguided weapons, the Archangel is designed as a platform for reconnaissance, monitoring, and the use of precision-guided munitions at altitudes of 3000 to 6000 meters and at ranges of 3 to 10 km from the target. The aircraft's creators believe that the survival rate of slow-moving aircraft such as the Air Tractor in typical close air support missions using "close combat weapons" against modern MANPADS and radar-guided anti-aircraft systems is very low. Therefore, when engaging targets with the Archangel, the emphasis is on the "remote" use of guided precision munitions, outside the effective range of anti-aircraft fire.

Currently, Archangel Block 3 Border Patrol Aircraft are participating in a competition announced by the Philippine government to replace the aging Rockwell OV-10 Bronco counterinsurgency aircraft. The Philippines intends to purchase six close air support aircraft for a total of US$114 million. The Archangel's competitors include the Brazilian Super Tucano attack aircraft, the American Beechcraft AT-6 Texan II and the Swiss Pilatus PC-21.

The Archangel can carry more weapons on its external hardpoints than any competitor. The cost of the aircraft is approximately $8 million, which is significantly less than the Super Tucano ($12-13 million).


The light turbojet combat aircraft "Scorpion", currently undergoing testing in the USA, has a clearly expressed "counterinsurgency" focus.


Light turbojet combat aircraft "Scorpion"


According to the company - developer Textron AirLand, the new aircraft is designed for use in local conflicts, border security, in the field of maritime patrols, in the fight against drugs.



The Scorpion has a reconfigurable internal bay that can be used to accommodate weapons, sensors, or additional fuel. The bay has a volume to accommodate a payload of 1362 kg. The aircraft has six underwing mounts for hanging weapons or fuel tanks with a total weight of about 3000 kg. The maximum takeoff weight of the aircraft will be 9600 kg, the range of 4440 km. The aircraft's power plant consists of two Honeywell TFE731 turbofan engines with a total thrust of about 835,6 kN.
If a buyer is found, the aircraft can enter mass production as early as 2015.


By the "anti-insurgency" can be fully attributed consisting in service in the US "ganships" AC-130, armed with 25-mm, 40-mm and 105-mm guns.


AC-130


Another armed aircraft based on the C-130 “Hercules” was the special operations support aircraft MC-130W Combat Spear.


MC-130W Combat Spear


Four squadrons equipped with the MS-130 are used for deep raids into enemy territory to deliver or receive personnel and cargo during special operations.



Depending on the task being performed, the Bushmaster 30-mm gun and Hellfire missiles can be installed on it.



Recently, there has been a trend towards creating “counter-insurgency” vehicles based on medium, light military transport and multi-purpose aircraft by installing quickly assembled modules on them with artillery weapons, suspension units for high-precision light munitions and corresponding reconnaissance and guidance equipment.


A striking example of the interest in such machines is the MC-27J shown at the Farnborough air show. It is based on the military transport C-27J Spartan.


MC-27J


The "main caliber" of this armed aircraft is the 30-mm automatic cannon "ATK GAU-23", which is a modification of the "Mk 44 Bushmaster" cannon.



The artillery system is mounted in the cargo cabin of the aircraft. The fire is carried out of the cargo door on the left side.


The pages of "Military Review" have repeatedly expressed the opinion that manned "counter-guerrilla" aviation has no future and that light attack aircraft and "gunships" will soon be replaced by drones and faster and better protected attack aircraft. However, in practice, the exact opposite is observed.
Thus, in the US, the last remaining "classic" A-10 "Thunderbolt-2" attack aircraft are planned to be decommissioned soon. The bet on armed "medium class" drones such as the MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper has not fully justified itself.

The unconditional advantages of UAVs are lower operating costs and the absence of the risk of death or capture of the pilot in the event of a shootdown. At the same time, losses of UAVs in combat areas turned out to be quite significant. According to the US military, as of 2010, more than 70 MQ-1/RQ-1 Predators were lost. In the same 2010, each Predator cost the US Department of Defense $4,03 million. That is, the funds saved on relatively low operating costs were largely used to purchase new UAVs to replace those lost.

Attack drones capable of patrolling for long periods of time have proven to be a very successful tool for eliminating al-Qaeda leaders, but the small complement of weapons on board (two AGM-114 Hellfires) does not allow destroying multiple targets or hampering enemy actions. In addition, these missiles, due to the insufficient mass of the warhead, are ineffective against caves and strong capital structures. The communication and data transmission lines of American UAVs have proven vulnerable to interference and interception of transmitted information. The inability of attack drones to perform sharp anti-aircraft maneuvers if necessary and the maximum lightweight design makes them very vulnerable even in the event of minor damage.

An important factor is the greater carrying capacity of light attack aircraft compared to UAVs; only the RQ-4 Global Hawk strategic reconnaissance drone surpasses them in this indicator. In terms of the service life and durability of the airframe, flexibility of use and resistance to combat damage, manned aircraft are still significantly superior to unmanned aircraft.

Modern UAVs, their onboard equipment, control centers and software are considered “critical technologies” that the US is extremely reluctant to share. Therefore, it is easier for the Americans to supply their allies in the “anti-terrorist war” with light “counter-guerrilla” attack aircraft, which can use a wider range of aviation weapons than UAVs.

Sources:
http://www.militaryparitet.com
http://www.cofe.ru/avia
http://www.ahrlac.com/
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    17 June 2014 09: 17
    can we also arm the An-2? Hang guns and machine guns on it. Potato for dropping.

    I personally liked the "Scorpion" - a beautiful plane. :)
    1. +6
      17 June 2014 09: 56
      Quote: Takashi
      can we also arm An-2?

      Oh, we can! Although it was already like this, they hung a container with weapons
      The idea must work, of course, and you need to count the money. I'm exaggerating a little, but take the IL-2, it's armored, add avionics and go ahead. It doesn't need to show miracles of piloting and speed when fighting with the Partisans.
      photo also as an example of the use of civil aircraft
      [img] http: // http: //foto-transporta.ru/main.php? g2_view = core.DownloadItem & g2_item
      Id = 102128 & g2_serialNumber = 2 [/ img]

      An-2F, scout and spotter
      1. +1
        18 June 2014 06: 04
        I agree with silt -2, and most importantly, take the amount
    2. +8
      17 June 2014 10: 01
      A good analogue of the Scorpio in my opinion is the Yak-130. It seems he has a 'light attacker' option.
      Thanks to the author for a wonderful review! I read it with pleasure!
    3. -1
      17 June 2014 10: 04
      Quote: Takashi
      can we also arm An-2?

      It was already, the container with weapons was suspended
    4. +3
      17 June 2014 13: 36
      Quote: Takashi
      can we also arm An-2?

      04.06.13 VO article An-2 at war
      http://topwar.ru/28970-an-2-na-voyne.html
    5. Ghjynjyjoiiyr
      -1
      7 July 2014 21: 44
      It will not work, it is too noisy and flies a little faster than driving a good passenger car on the road!
    6. Ghjynjyjoiiyr
      0
      7 July 2014 21: 47
      If we talk about rarities, then it is worth resuscitating the Po-2, as a night one. According to the effectiveness of the BP, it took the second place after the IL-2, then the PES, Il-4, Boston, etc.
  2. +7
    17 June 2014 09: 45
    AT-802U - similar to Il-2 in single-seat version, only the characteristics are at a modern level.
    1. +1
      17 June 2014 12: 34
      Maybe we should upgrade and release the IL-2 with modern weapons?
  3. +2
    17 June 2014 10: 37
    Quote: Takashi
    can we also arm the An-2? Hang guns and machine guns on it. Potato for dropping.

    I personally liked the "Scorpion" - a beautiful plane. :)
    It is better to reincarnate IL2 taking into account modern materials and technologies :)
  4. de bouillon
    +4
    17 June 2014 11: 22
    excellent review

    super caravan can now be observed in Iraq. Almost half of the air strikes come from them, and the air tractor really reminds us of the IL-2, or rather the IL-10

    By the way, it is now possible that the AC-130 will return to Iraq again
  5. +5
    17 June 2014 11: 46
    Yes, it seems that UAVs will not come soon to replace manned aircraft. Thanks to the author for the article, I will try to read the rest of this series. I believe that counterinsurgency aviation is good as long as there is no skillful counteraction from the ground, otherwise each departure will be akin to a lottery, which, incidentally, was already written earlier in the comments.
    1. 0
      17 June 2014 15: 03
      I don't understand on what basis you draw such conclusions. "Anti-Portizan" attack aircraft is a fiction, for a small amount, giving the illusion of the presence of the Air Force, well, at least, their strike component. I would like to note that such "papelats" are in service only with the Maroon regimes included in the "orbit" of the USA. Not a single country in the post-Soviet space has such "misunderstandings", and independent third world states prefer to use full-fledged strike machines for real combat operations. I do not quite understand how "gunships" are related to this, these devices can hardly be classified as cheap; both in terms of the cost of the sample and the flight hour. I will also note that the Yak-130 in the strike version has not been adopted by the Russian Federation. To all fans of reincarnations, I remind you that after the IL-10M, not a single single-propeller strike aircraft (or strike modification of such) was adopted for service, think about why? Regarding UAVs; it is very strange that in the article the authors try to contrast light attack vehicles with unmanned reconnaissance aircraft for which attack functions are an option. The main job of these devices is to transmit data in real time, which is the basis of "critical technologies". The creation of specialized attack drones is a matter of the near future - all the prerequisites are there. By the way, I cannot imagine how it is possible to influence the control of a robot using electronic warfare. After all, such complexes are closed automated systems. The principle of delivering a strike automatically, at a pre-reconnoitered target, was implemented on the Su-17 (4 route points), and on the MiG-27M \ D the PNK was brought to an absolutely combat-ready state. The Su-25T PNK had the ability to automatically recognize and identify objects on a television image. Ethical issues remain (leave the right to launch for a person), but in the modern world this cannot be considered a serious obstacle (unfortunately).
      1. de bouillon
        +3
        17 June 2014 16: 10
        and in the USSR they never worked on a project Counterguerrilla aircraft

        It was the US that got itself into trouble in Indochina and in the conditions of a slow war they needed simple and cheap aircraft. Moreover, at the initial stage of the war in Laos, Cambodia and South Vietnam the partisans did not have serious air defense.

        But it all started back in 1960, when the CIA needed military aircraft, but the Air Force did not. So they went screw junk from conservation warehouses. After repair and certain improvements, the birds were sent to battle.

        The USA used the same method back in Central and Latin America, starting in the 50s, filling up the entire continent: Mustangs, Thunderbolts, Mitchells, Invaders and so on.
        1. +1
          17 June 2014 18: 37
          We worked ... the project, in my opinion, the end of the 50s, I don't remember the brand, but the name was "Goby" because of the similarity to fish. The project did not go Tk abandoned in favor of helicopters.
          1. 0
            8 November 2017 12: 41
            “Goby” - a project of an anti-submarine defense aircraft for a fully-fledged aircraft carrier being designed (in the late 60s and early 70s, as far as I remember)
            .
        2. +4
          17 June 2014 20: 14
          They worked on the theme of a mobilization attack aircraft-multi-purpose aircraft in the 80s, the same as a counter-guerrilla attack aircraft.
        3. 52
          0
          18 June 2014 16: 56
          "and in the USSR they never worked on the Anti-Partisan aircraft project"
          Not true, YAK-52B, aka YAK-54 (the first with the same name). It’s just that the prospects of this child prodigy were not even visible through a telescope.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        18 June 2014 13: 21
        I do not agree, a turboprop truck that can drop a planning bomb and equipped with reconnaissance targets at a distance of 5-20 km is much more effective than a helicopter in terms of money and supplies.
        1. 0
          18 June 2014 13: 48
          If you plan to spend UAB or Hellfire / Sturm for every target in a counterguerrilla war, then how will it be a cheap replacement for a helicopter?
  6. Georgich
    +3
    17 June 2014 12: 35
    Quote: inkass_98
    AT-802U - similar to Il-2 in single-seat version, only the characteristics are at a modern level.

    I was reminded of the IL-10, especially from the front side.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +7
    17 June 2014 13: 31
    The plane in the first photo is very similar to the German diving Junkers.
  9. +7
    17 June 2014 15: 58
    This AHRLAC is very pretty. Its probably easy
    remake and into an unmanned version. The pushing screw is silent.
    In the 2-seater version it is convenient as a training aircraft for pilots
    and intelligence officers.
  10. +1
    17 June 2014 18: 05
    I love propeller airplanes !!! Simply adore... fellow
  11. +5
    17 June 2014 18: 12
    A great article! The author is PLUSER!)))
  12. -2
    17 June 2014 19: 32
    Hmm. Very interesting. Only it is not clear why the MC-130W Combat Spear, AC-130, MC-27J are included in the category of "anti-partisan" aircraft. Unless they perform additional tasks along the way, in addition to the main, most likely, transport task. Or there is nothing at hand. We do not include the Il-76, similar to the one shot down in Lugansk, in the category of anti-partisan aircraft (I understand, the name is conditional), although it also has weapons that can be reinforced even with half-ton bombs. For reconnaissance and strike purposes, the light reconnaissance and strike aircraft listed by you in both articles are preferable, much more economical and, it seems to me, more effective. I cannot agree with Argon, who claims: "Anti-Portizan" attack aircraft is a fiction, for a small sum, giving the illusion of the presence of the Air Force, well, at least, their strike component." In my opinion, a self-respecting state MUST have a full range of aviation, designed to perform a variety of tasks in the least expensive way. Thanks for the interesting topic.
    1. -1
      17 June 2014 20: 22
      Now the partisans have very often MANPADS, a more or less well-functioning air defense system. The presented planes (except for large ones) are more likely against drug gangsters, like Tucano in Brazil. Mi-24/28/35 is much more suitable for actions against partisans, given what fortified areas Mujahideen created in Afghanistan and the Czechs in Chechnya-Su-25.
      1. +4
        17 June 2014 21: 07
        Forgive me, but not every group of partisans of 5-6 people has MANPADS and a radar. Such aircraft are just for such groups. You can, of course, send Tu-160 for fidelity ...
        1. +5
          17 June 2014 21: 29
          "considering what fortified areas the Mujahideen created in Afghanistan and the Czechs in Chechnya"
          In the presence of fortified areas, developed air defense, such aircraft should not be used as shock. Only as a reconnaissance. Strikes are inflicted by another class of aircraft.
    2. +2
      20 June 2014 06: 51
      Quote: Oprychnik
      We do not classify IL-76, similar to the shot down in Lugansk, to counterguerrilla aircraft

      Does Il-76 have weapons for firing at ground targets? what And about halftone bombs in more detail, please.
  13. portoc65
    +1
    17 June 2014 22: 18
    as the Americans don’t have diesel submarines, we don’t have this niche, probably because there are no partisans. But it’s interesting .. why chase expensive attack aircraft to destroy a small convoy or roadblock .. quite a light maize ..
    1. 0
      18 June 2014 04: 45
      Eeeee ... The first and second Chechen companies, who in the North Caucasus? We have enough partisans, just an army calmly doing without cornmen.
    2. 0
      20 June 2014 23: 49
      The Russian Navy includes 13 nuclear submarines with ballistic missiles, 27 nuclear submarines with missile and torpedo weapons, 19 diesel submarines, 8 nuclear submarines for special purposes and 1 diesel submarine for special purposes.

      What does the partisans have to do with it? :)
  14. +1
    18 June 2014 04: 56
    Quote: Oprychnik
    Forgive me, but not every group of partisans of 5-6 people has MANPADS and a radar. Such aircraft are just for such groups. You can, of course, send Tu-160 for fidelity ...


    Enough VNOS posts, shepherds did an excellent job.
    Here, the limitation is the possibility of financing, whether an illegal armed formation can afford MANPADS or not, in our case it can.
    You can also Tu-160, but the Mi-24/35/28 and the like will do better. Isn’t it easier to spend money on a installation like Granite than on a dull aircraft with a limited scope?
    In the role of reconnaissance UAVs are better.
    1. +2
      18 June 2014 08: 01
      Amendment. Installation Golden Eagle.
  15. vietnam7
    +2
    18 June 2014 11: 02
    "the concept of an airborne command and reconnaissance post with the ability to carry out independent strikes with precision weapons if necessary has been implemented." - I just imagined a command post in the skies over Chechnya full of staff officers and a pilot "who hasn't been home since Afghanistan" yelling - "open the windows, I'm going to iron the spirits now!"
  16. +1
    18 June 2014 13: 32
    Modern UAVs, their on-board equipment, control points and software are classified as “critical technologies”, which the United States does not share very readily. Therefore, it is easier for the Americans to deliver to their allies in the "anti-terrorist war" light "counterguerrilla" attack aircraft, from which it is possible to use a wider spectrum of aircraft weapons than the UAV.

    I spoke in the first part, I will repeat it now. These "counter-guerrilla" attack aircraft are a dead-end branch of aviation. Normal attack aircraft and GPs are the means of fighting partisans. Drones are reconnaissance and delivering pinpoint strikes.
    1. +3
      18 June 2014 19: 15
      That is, questions about the cost of operation do not bother you? Will the departure cost 100 or 1000 tugriks celebrated?
      1. +3
        18 June 2014 19: 20
        Now I understand why the contract for the Mistrals was signed. These issues have not been addressed sufficiently. Are you from MO? :)))
        1. +1
          18 June 2014 22: 47
          I, NOT FROM MO !!!
      2. +1
        18 June 2014 19: 54
        Any technology, let alone military, is a complex of compromises; even the USA cannot refuse completely unmanaged TSA, not to mention other countries.
        Our enemy is most often well trained, has very good weapons. The point is to keep in service a plane that is highly likely to not be able to carry out b / s?
        1. +3
          18 June 2014 21: 03
          Again, I can object. Such a plane in peacetime can be used as a training facility. Although, of course, trouble with the conversion in case of need is enough. Patrol and reconnaissance flights are also not unnecessary, and this may be the main task in peacetime.
          There are pros and cons, I agree. But, in my opinion, more advantages.
          1. +2
            18 June 2014 21: 22
            Maybe as a machine for initial training. How many of these machines do the Air Force need? 10-20?
            Reconnaissance / patrol - if we don’t go down below 5 km, it makes sense to keep a separate car if any civilian side capable of carrying a container with reconnaissance equipment can cope with this task?
            While the organizationally light attack aircraft should be part of the army aviation.
            A helicopter as part of AA, and even better in the state of the DShBr / DShB, can carry either drums for support, or transport in the DShMG, tactical landing at any time, in peacetime or in the military.

            I'm not saying that such an aircraft is useless, but for those who have no money and the enemy air defense-DShK on a tripod maximum.
          2. -4
            18 June 2014 22: 59
            In the first part of the review, I called it "UNDERPLANE"
            Reread the first part. winked
            1. +3
              20 June 2014 14: 42
              Quote: kirpich
              In the first part of the review, I called it "UNDERPLANE"
              Reread the first part. winked

              On the question of "underplanes":
              Jordanian Air Force will upgrade one of two C-295 military transport aircraft manufactured by the European company Airbus Defense & Space, into a machine capable of performing assault functions.

              The attack aircraft will be an addition to two AC235 multipurpose aircraft of similar purpose, which were modernized by ATK from the base transport variant C235. According to Flightglobal Ascend Online, the country has two C295 aircraft that were built in the 2003 year.

              Aircraft of this modification will be equipped with an on-board fire control system, which includes optoelectronic sensors and synthetic aperture radars, and there is also a self-defense system. The armament consists of 30 mm guns, tactical SD air-to-air Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire and NUR units of 70 mm caliber. BAE Systems was selected as the supplier of an expanded range of precision weapons to meet the latest Jordanian Air Force requirements for equipping AC235 aircraft.

              It is reported that the "artillery planes" (Gunship) will be a powerful and effective addition to the combat potential of the armed forces of the kingdom. Aircraft are able to provide direct aviation support for special forces, conduct armed reconnaissance, search and rescue in combat conditions.

              http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/jordan-to-expand-gunship-fleet-with-c2
              95-conversion-400500 /
  17. ZIS
    +4
    18 June 2014 16: 54
    The first one looks awesome, it would not hurt to have a regiment of such in the internal troops ...
    1. -4
      18 June 2014 17: 12
      Why (in the sense, to hell)?
  18. +2
    18 June 2014 17: 13
    MC-27J? ... but we (hopefully) have MS-21 ... fellow
    Cool looks ...
    1. +4
      19 June 2014 02: 27
      This is a modification of the Archangel Block 3 of the Philippine Air Force contestant to replace the OV-10 Bronco.
  19. +1
    18 June 2014 17: 51
    Instead of such a very questionable, it’s better to reintroduce the child prodigy into the Armed Forces Airborne Forces with their own full-time airborne infantry regiments or as part of the MSD / TD / MSBR DShBr, again with their helicopters, the effect will be much greater, and in a war of any type, rather than only against partisans without air defense.
  20. novik-rif
    0
    20 June 2014 14: 18
    The author forgot his IL-102! A little upgrade and give odds to any counterguerrilla apparatus.
    1. +3
      20 June 2014 14: 45
      Quote: novik-rif
      The author forgot his IL-102! A little upgrade and give odds to any counterguerrilla apparatus.

      The author has not forgotten that the Il-102 took part in the competition simultaneously with the Su-25. For a number of reasons, it cannot be considered "anti-partisan".
  21. +4
    20 June 2014 23: 57
    A + to the author!
    In addition to fighting partisans, this also includes reconnaissance, border patrol, and the fight against poaching, with significant financial savings.
    The demand for such machines is only increasing, but as far as I understand from the review, we don’t have much to offer on the market?
  22. +1
    9 July 2014 21: 05
    "The AC-130 gunships, armed with 25-mm, 40-mm and 105-mm guns, can be fully attributed to the" anti-insurgency "."

    It's hard not to get into such a "hippo" !!!!
  23. +1
    10 July 2014 04: 21
    Quote: smerx24
    It's hard not to get into such a "hippo" !!!!

    From what, what weapons do gangs have that can hit targets at a height of several kilometers at night?