Medvedev refuses the model of "state capitalism"

Medvedev refuses the model of "state capitalism"

At the opening of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, President Dmitry Medvedev gave a speech in which he assessed the current state of the country's economy and described the main tasks of its modernization. One of the most prominent points of his speech was the rejection of the so-called. "State capitalism".


This is the XV International Economic Forum, which is dedicated to the problems of the world economy. According to D. Medvedev, the country has made great progress in its development over the past 20 years, so if in the Soviet Union the share of the private sector was approaching zero, now it is more than 60%. The state debt, which exceeded the state’s annual GDP by one and a half times, has now decreased to almost 10%. True, the president did not say about the corporate debt. As usual, the head of state lied about inflation, which, according to him, “was replaced by quite moderate rates of price growth.” Although the citizens of Russia, who are in grocery stores every day, clearly can fix it, but only who will give them the floor. According to him, the real consumption of citizens of the Russian Federation has doubled, although, according to Rossstat, about three-quarters of the population of the Russian Federation are low-income or most needy citizens.

It’s hard to understand that in the head of the Russian president, when he says: “You can enumerate a lot more, it is always nice to talk about what has been done. The main thing, it seems to me, is in one thing: we consistently and systematically - as far as possible, of course - moved forward. ” Where to go? For some reason it does not say how many thousands of villages, schools, kindergartens, libraries, houses of creativity, factories, agricultural enterprises, etc., have been destroyed. How many millions of citizens were brought to the graves by socio-economic genocide. How many billions of full-bodied rubles stolen. Moscow even homelessness, which is currently at the level of homelessness after the Civil War and World War II, can not win. Or do not want?

According to Medvedev, “Russia has preserved and even strengthened its leadership” in the field of space, although it is well known that the current Russian space is a legacy of the USSR and there are no new projects there. The same GLONASS - the first satellite of this system was launched by the USSR into orbit as early as 12 of October 1982. Leadership in the field of nuclear construction was also created in the USSR, it remains surprising, as it did not lose - apparently, due to the profitability of the industry.

Or this phrase: "We began to spread best practices throughout the country." Here the president, apparently, had in mind the practice of lies. Since paperwork simply drowned the country, everyone creates a portfolio, projects, etc., creating the appearance of intense activity, although the country has degraded and degraded.

The most significant messages

- According to the president, Russia is ready to join the World Trade Organization this year. Although many experts believe that the Russian Federation does not need to join this organization - it will be a serious blow to the already weakened economy of our country.

“I would like to state here very clearly that we are not building state capitalism,” for citizens of the Russian Federation this news will not be particularly joyful if it is deciphered. This means that Russia is waiting for "privatization-2", those enterprises that remained in the hands of the state will be transferred to private hands. Medvedev said that the current privatization plans are too modest, they will be expanded, the state will get rid of controlling and even blocking stakes. The state will even more distance itself from solving the problems of citizens, this will finally become their own task. And while Mr. President is going to fulfill these wishes, it is not clear: “The state should also create a system of social protection and public services that would stimulate Russian families to increase the number of children, to a healthy lifestyle, to continuous education, and finally to a long and fruitful work. " Not a single system in the West has coped with this - almost everywhere there is a decrease in population, not counting the States, where population growth is at the expense of migrants. Or is it our way? Gradual change of indigenous peoples to international biomass. Yes, and with a healthy lifestyle in the West from the hands of very bad - obesity, beer alcoholism, the growth of drug addiction, the growth of the mentally ill and other "delights" of Western civilization. And the best education system was the Soviet one, which is so diligently broken.

- In the same vein, Medvedev proposed to decentralize power, increasing the powers of municipal authorities.

- Medvedev decided to continue Kudrin’s policy and continue to “stock up,” as he called, “easy money” that came to Russia because of rising prices for raw materials, saving them. Although it is clear that the available finances should be invested in development, their “accumulation”, besides not in our system, can lead to their instant disappearance.

- Medvedev announced the future creation of a "capital federal district." We are talking about "the creation of the Moscow federal district, which goes beyond the traditional borders of Moscow, and with the transfer of a large share of the administrative functions of the federal level and, accordingly, state institutions, over these borders." And turn Moscow itself into an International Financial Center (MFC).

True, Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin clarified that we are talking about the transfer of a number of federal agencies beyond the borders of Moscow, and not about the unification of Moscow and the Moscow Region. Presidential Aide Arkady Dvorkovich said that most of the government agencies would be taken outside the city.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. His
    His 18 June 2011 09: 42 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It is time for Medvedev to give up power. Tired of humpback 2
  2. Igor
    Igor 18 June 2011 11: 05 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    You can continue to lie that everything is fine. But in fact, there is a blockage: in defense, in health care, in education, in the economy, in pension provision, in transport, etc. Everywhere at the helm are not professionals. Expect serious accidents on the railway, in aviation, at sea. The Far East, China will simply take away without any war. From any economic "forums" there is no practical sense. Modernization and innovation are chatter for cover. ER is worse than the Communist Party. "Popular Front" -masked political dictatorship. Wait for the explosion of people's patience.
    1. His
      His 18 June 2011 12: 35 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      And what does Medvedev offer is a way out? If Putin had been in the place of the hunchback, there would have been no collapse of the USSR, although he was destroyed by Yeltsin with former secretaries. Probably Putin would not have saved Russia then.
  3. viktor_ui 18 June 2011 12: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    A very interesting statement "creating a metropolitan federal district" ...,
    I can argue that as a result of this project, all ordinary residents will be thrown out of Moscow, and only money bags with their offspring will remain ??? bully What is it - KNOW HOW is kinky in the fight against traffic jams (read with extra people who don’t have an extra billion and who automatically become cattle and shit ???) Well, it’s very interesting how much dough will be thrown into this furnace ???
  4. datur 18 June 2011 12: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    virtual nanodam. apparently lives in the virtual completely and he has all the hockey there.
  5. yuvit
    yuvit 18 June 2011 12: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Does Medvedev live in a different dimension or galaxy? Does he not know about the tens of millions of Russians living beyond the poverty line, one and a half million homeless (street) children?
    In three years of power, he destroyed what was done before him.
    Poor, poor humiliated, insulted Russia, the people who have been robbed to the skin and in power a worthless person leading the country into the abyss! Eh .....!
  6. datur 18 June 2011 12: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Medvedev refuses the model of "state capitalism" --- apparently we are moving to serfdom !!!!!
  7. pokermen
    pokermen 18 June 2011 13: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Apparently soon state. institutions will be moved closer to the ruble and all will be fenced
  8. Joker
    Joker 18 June 2011 16: 25 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Anecdote:

    The meeting - well, comrades, it seems like we have everything, both state and power, now it’s time to think about the people.
    A voice from the audience - yes, at first at least 200 showers.
  9. Max79 18 June 2011 16: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We, ordinary people do not need the country to enter the WTO. This is necessary first of all to the oligarchs, therefore, together with Dima they make such disastrous decisions for us. And all the infection that appears like E. coli will flood to us in Russia. Dima doesn’t wants to take care of ordinary people, the majority of our agriculture and the like. Only everything to the tune of the oligarchs.
  10. Michael
    Michael 18 June 2011 17: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In the early 80s, Soviet intelligence managed to extract materials from the so-called "Harvard Project." It consisted of three volumes: "Perestroika", "Reform", "Completion".
    At the beginning of the first volume is a large preamble, which stated that on the verge of the 10th and XNUMXst centuries, humanity is facing a terrible crisis due to the lack of raw materials and energy resources. Anglo-Saxon environmental analysts have come to the conclusion that saving humanity depends on how much common problems can be resolved after the destruction, as the then US President Ronald Reagan, of the “Empire of Evil”, that is, at the expense of the USSR, with a planned population reduction of XNUMX times and the destruction of the nation state. The program is designed for three five-year periods.
    In the first five years from 1985 to 1990, Perestroika will be held with its publicity, the struggle for socialism “with a human face”, and the preparation of reforms “from socialism to capitalism”.
    The second volume was devoted to "Reform", its time was 1990-1995, and its objectives were as follows:
    1. The elimination of the world socialist system. 2. Liquidation of the Warsaw Pact. 3. The elimination of the CPSU. 4. The elimination of the USSR.
    The third volume was called "Completion", it was supposed to be led by the third leader, his time - 1996-2000. It contained the following items:
    1. The elimination of the Soviet army. 2. The elimination of Russia as a state. 3. The elimination of the attributes of socialism, such as free training and medical care, and the introduction of the attributes of capitalism: you have to pay for everything. 4. The elimination of public and state property and the introduction of private property everywhere. " (32) in time - not a coincidence, but in essence .........
    1. Owl
      Owl 19 June 2011 12: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I observe the "THIRD STAGE OF DESTRUCTION OF THE SOVIET UNION (RUSSIA)"
  11. mitrich
    mitrich 18 June 2011 18: 02 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    I carefully read the article by Sasha Samsonov, and came to the following comforting or disappointing (as for whom) opinion: it’s time to change Dmitry Anatolyevich! In general, it was time to not appoint him as president!
    I am not a great economist, but I always believed that ordinary human logic and peasant wisdom are stronger than all these shitty economic theories. And if so, then why are modern capitalist oligarchs-privateers striving precisely for the most prosperous sector of the economy: gas production, the oil industry and those sectors of industry where the state has traditionally STRONG positions? I am not against capitalism and private initiative, on the contrary, “for”, but where is it applicable? Bad roads in Russia - please build houses - please organize car production (here Prokhorov is great with his E-mobile) or some other equipment - please, shops and restaurants with cafes - please. And here is where the state itself with a mustache is sorry! Oil, gas, vodka - the state and is able to make money on it. There is already state capitalism.
    Next, about the WTO. The attitude is ambiguous. For pricing in stores, entry is a definite plus. There should be competition among manufacturers, and no one would die from it, and if they died, then no one would join the WTO. The WTO is the strongest blow to dealers, and not to the peasantry, although they talk about the opposite. After all, the villagers both handed over milk and donate 7 rubles each. per liter (this is in the Sverdlovsk region), but how much is it in stores? From 23 rubles and above, that is, the price is overvalued more than 3 times. In this regard, I am for the WTO. But if again we will talk about the natural resources of Russia, then against, definitely.
    1. pokermen
      pokermen 18 June 2011 18: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      mitrich
      And what difference does it make on how much they buy, most milk and dairy products are now made from powder with palm fat
      For example, about Don and the Kuban, I can say that there are almost no dairy farms, and on the shelves of the mountain dairy products ... creameries go bankrupt because everyone has switched to palm oil en masse
    2. His
      His 18 June 2011 19: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Agree
  12. mitrich
    mitrich 18 June 2011 18: 56 New
    • -4
    • 0
    -4
    POKERMEN,
    Well, not all milk is powder in stores, as they say here, price is quality. But the Donetsk and Kuban people are still mainly focused on the production of grain crops, and not on livestock, or am I wrong?
  13. Born in the USSR
    Born in the USSR 18 June 2011 20: 11 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Or maybe he’s right, this is Medvedev that the state should continue to give the economy to private hands.
    I would love to “privatize” a dozen or two rifle arsenals and give them to the thirsty population for cheap.
    Those holding power would immediately have combed themselves in a different way, the army would hardly have been against, and we will persuade the secret police forever, but the police themselves will run away ....
    The joke is all this, of course, but very bitter ....
    It’s a pity that only one sign remains from the country, as in a department store in the year 90, and behind it there is nothing but those in need of something ...
  14. atheist
    atheist 18 June 2011 22: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    we have livestock and crop production and fish farming in the Kuban, but this is still not enough, and there isn’t enough food for everyone (officially there’s not enough migrants from the Caucasian republics in fact), so we have to do everything that people don’t they died of starvation, and even fires and hail also hit the crop, import from abroad hit the producers, and this leads to a decrease in production by next year and so on in decreasing order, until there is nothing left
    as for the bear, I don’t support him and I won’t vote for anyone. He trampled my trust in him with his stupid disarmament agreements with the United States, and this is a farce and the collapse of an already weak army
  15. pokermen
    pokermen 18 June 2011 23: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    mitrich
    Animal husbandry is tied to crop production, so it is foolish to separate them.

    What can I say about the Kuban before the beginning of the 2000s there were approximately 8-12 collective farms in each district, each collective farm had 3-6 farms, 150-600 cows on each farm ...... now 2 remained in the districts -3 collective farms + a couple of farmers. What to make natural milk ??

    Oddly enough, almost all collective farms survived the 90s, and the collapse and cutting to zero began under Tkachev and Edra
  16. atheist
    atheist 18 June 2011 23: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    pokerman, I agree with you, just like with any urbanization, they leave the villages, and accordingly, who will feed them
    and about living and growing, one can argue with each other only in a pair of products, but all this is a chain of world events in the world - the famine of Africa, war and natural disasters
    I do not understand, and who is edra?
    1. pokermen
      pokermen 19 June 2011 11: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This is not urbanization, but targeted destruction ..... I know several cases when people with forks and axes came out when trying to bring cows to a meat factory, because for many it was the only job.

      With animal husbandry, crop rotation is more complete, for example, alfalfa, corn for silage, legumes are almost not planted without animal husbandry, and these crops very well affect the fertility of the land
      .
      EdRo- United Russia))
  17. Pinocchio
    Pinocchio 19 June 2011 11: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Medvedev now represents the interests of the financial elite. Investment is a screen ...... The forum has confirmed this. He’s the presidential candidate, a luxurious figure for general people. There are too many resignations (under the guise of certification) in law enforcement agencies and not only ...... And since the whole world was voiced the proposal to nominate the Bear for the Nobel Peace Prize in Libya, then it all became clear. Putin is slowly being circumcised ...
  18. Owl
    Owl 19 June 2011 12: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The traitor uses his power and control of the State Duma for the final destruction of statehood.
  19. Eric
    Eric 19 June 2011 16: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Damn so many things I want to dash and break ... Sunday and still had to go to school ...
  20. atheist
    atheist 19 June 2011 17: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I'm more on a fish farm, and in principle, we could be in the 1st place in the production of black caviar in the world if we did not close the factories
    Putin and Medvedev from one bag, all this entails a heap of problems that are already visible now, the top is engaged only in foreign policy and not in any way internal, it kills me
  21. Michael
    Michael 19 June 2011 21: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, the Nobel Prize is being nominated as a candidate, but this is SUSPECTIVE!
  22. pokermen
    pokermen 19 June 2011 23: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, so as not to lag behind the black "friend" ....... by the way Zadornov is fun to bear the banter, look vidyushki
  23. Stavr
    Stavr 20 June 2011 08: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The country is already in agony. Few people understand that starting in 2013, the Russian economy will fall into the abyss with cosmic speed. Today’s power is only capable of destruction, and the "Harvard Project" is carried out impeccably. Nobody will believe now, but after the “war” for the presidential election, Russia is doomed to a miserable existence, right down to a slide to hunger riots. I would like to close my eyes to this future so as not to see. What's the point? It will come regardless of our desires. I just know this, and I would like to not know at all and not to see what I saw ahead!
  24. Vladimir
    Vladimir 20 June 2011 09: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why is power bad, among other things? The fact that it does not explain to the people the details and essence of the theses, which leads to their free interpretation by experts, political scientists, just writers and philosophers.
    The country's resource base - oil, gas, diamonds, timber industry, etc., will remain in state ownership. It is also planned to strengthen state monopolies in the field of mechanical engineering, heavy industry, which consists of non-ferrous and ferrous metallurgy, machine tool industry, the automotive industry, i.e. of all that is called "production of means of production."
    But the non-core assets of these enterprises - motels, boarding houses, various "daughters" that are not related to the direct activities of this corporation will be put under the hammer. These non-core assets are money-laundering schemes and a swamp of corruption. For example, I reliably know one such example, which will be realized very soon. One large state corporation, one of the top five of the top 10 corporations in the country, has on its balance sheet more than 60 enterprises that are not related to the profile of this structure, of which about 30 are boarding houses, hotels, hotels, and from Kamchatka to Yalta. How to wash the money to carry out overhauls and ongoing maintenance to write or not? These are tens of billions of rubles, going to personal accounts and in pockets.
    These assets will be sold. Those. in this case, the "destruction of state capitalism" within the framework of one company will occur. This will allow not to scatter funds, not to cut the budget, focus on the main activities of the company and the departure of "effective managers", the coming to the leadership of professionals who now do not play the first roles and do not have access to financial flows.
    As for a number of companies that are planned to be partially denationalized, 49% will remain in state ownership, and the remaining shares will be floated by minority shareholders, and so that no one will have a blocking stake. We need money for modernization and innovation, and in order to attract it, primarily from abroad, we need to create a good investment climate. And for this, you just need to remove the corruption component, the conditions for its occurrence and the environment.
    But Medvedev must leave, I agree with this and always was not his supporter.
  25. imjrek
    imjrek 20 June 2011 10: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    a big mistake, and it’s better to say TRAGIC mistake is that the bulk of the Russian people associate themselves with this power.
    she demands a preference from her, fulfillment of her obligations, chooses her (or rather plays elective games with the authorities), in general, in one way or another, interacts with her, thereby giving her legitimacy. in response, it acts according to its essence, producing genocide of the Russian people.
    in general, the question is not in this acupacial power, everything is clear with it, the question is in the Russian people, until they interact with this power, until it is completely overwhelmed with Russians.