The number of Chinese long-range bomber aviation is sharply reduced

9
Since 2008, there has been a steady trend associated with the restructuring of three Chinese long-range bombing divisions, which generally leads to a significant and sharp reduction in the number of long-range bombers. This is very likely due to the changes in the general international situation that China has to face. In addition, most of the N-6 bombers were manufactured in the 1980s, and most of them are approaching the exhaustion of their resources. On the other hand, there are no signs that Xi'an aviation Corporation (Xi'an Aircraft Corporation) is a large-scale production of H-6. Clearly, Chinese long-range aviation (YES) capabilities are declining. Kanwa magazine presents its thoughts on the topic.



The Chinese Air Force has three divisions YES: 36-I, 8-I and 10-I. The 10 Division is deployed in the Nanking Military District and has an Anqing-based airfield. It includes both the old H-6H modifications and the most modern H-6K, that is, the overall technical level of the aircraft has increased. In other aircraft divisions, the number H6 significantly decreased.

The 36-I bomber division is deployed in the Lazhou Military District and is based on the Wukong and Lintong airfields. Satellite photos taken by 13 on November 2006 show that there was a 21 bomber in Wukong, of which 10 were operated. In 2003, satellite photographs recorded the H-33 bomber in Wukong 6. In Lintong as of August 2009, not a single H-6 was observed, although in April of the same year there were 16 bombers. On this account there may be two considerations. The first is that the 36-division was reduced, two long-range regiments were merged into one, which corresponds to the level of Russian-Chinese relations after the Cold War. According to the second, Lintong Airfield needed urgent repairs, and therefore all the aircraft temporarily left it. The Chinese Air Force currently repairs the 2-3 airfield annually.

The 8 bomber division in the Guangzhou Military District uses Dangyang and Leiyang airfields. At Danyang airfield in January, 2010 was not visible on the photo from satellites. Only IL-76 transport aircraft remained on it. And in 2004, the 22 bomber was spotted on it. Available photos from 2006. Indicate the presence of a 31 bomber in Leyang. The airfield is equipped with underground shelters similar to those based on the 10 division in Ankin. The underground tunnel is 10-meter wide, and its wingspan is similar to the Soviet Tu-16 and is 30 meters. Obviously, the tunnel is used as a storage for ammunition and fuel. According to the bold assumption of Kanwa, bombers in underground tunnels are equipped with nuclear ammunition. (it is not very clear what the Kanwa authors had in mind with regard to the conclusions about the purpose of the underground tunnels by the sentence above. - P. 2).



The 10 division of the Air Force in the Nanking Military District was the only one to receive reinforcements, and the situation at the Daiocang bases (Dajiaochang) and Ankin gives more information about the latest trends.

First, at the airfield in Ankin in June 2009, the X-NUMX H-15 bombers were noticed, among which five were distinguished by their fresh color. According to Kanwa, these were the newly launched upgraded H-6K bombers, which can be used by CJ-6 cruise missiles. Are these bombers aimed at Okinawa, Taiwan or even Guam? Comparing these photographs of the Ankin airfield with the 10 made in March, it is found that at that time there were only nine H-2008s on it, but the remaining parts of the airfield did not look neglected. This may indicate that other H-6 flew. Photos taken in July 6 show 2004 bombers, which corresponds to the size of the regiment. Satellite photographs of this aerodrome, taken in three different lengths of time, underline the fact that the aerodrome is highly alert, and the ammunition and fuel storages are hidden underground.

At the Daiao airfield (as the text probably refers to the same Dajiaochang airfield - P.2) in Nanking 2009 in August 17 H-6 bombers were observed from satellites, but only 13 were in parking positions and probably were regularly used . In July 2007, 21 H-6 was spotted here, in 2006, 23, in January, 2005, 18. Obviously, the 10 Division consists of two bomber regiments.



Consider the production of H-6 bomber. The 2009 9 + 1 bomber H-6 was recorded from satellites at the Xlang Test Center in Yanliang in October, with one H-6 standing at a separate site. Kanwa had once suggested that it probably could have been an H-6K modification bomber, and the remaining nine could belong to the recently launched N-6H or H-6M naval aviation, or a special version of H6 with an extended lifespan. It can also be assumed that the H-6 were stored there.

Based on a long-term analysis of satellite photographs, Kanwa believes that the H-6 bombers, whose nose and tail parts of the fuselage are covered with a tarpaulin, belong to the machines of the new production. Three of the nine aircraft are covered with tarpaulin. According to satellite photographs, in April 2009, only two H-6 were at the aerodrome. These two H-6 seem very interesting, since many cars were seen around them. According to Kanwa, it is very likely H-6K. In June, 2006. Satellite photographs showed that there were nine H-6 at the aerodrome, of which seven were covered with tarpaulin. This clearly indicates that the production of H-6 bombers is very limited.

In general, the fleet of the Chinese H-6 bombers is shrinking, while the new bombers have not yet begun flight testing.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The Soviet
    +2
    16 June 2011 12: 34
    Tu ... he is in China Tu ... smile
  2. +2
    16 June 2011 13: 22
    the Chinese are apparently stolen something new. here they get rid of junk.
  3. Demonzz
    +1
    16 June 2011 18: 16
    article is complete nonsense. not only are the city names incorrect (Lintong is Lintong, Leyang and not Leyang), and the content is like ..... let's say .... nonsense. The Kanwa Defense Review, referred to here, is a fairly normal journal in terms of analytics and could not write such nonsense, at least right now there (http://www.kanwa.com/defr/) nothing of the kind has been posted.
  4. badger2011
    +1
    16 June 2011 20: 09
    If it is not posted on the site, this does not mean that the article was not published in the journal itself. Canva loves to suck her paw very much, so this material should be considered in the same vein, since there is no other information in China anyway
    1. Demonzz
      +1
      17 June 2011 02: 44
      across China is a sea of ​​material, it’s enough to know at least English. Here's an example: http://www.sinodefence.com/ And there are a dozen of such sites. Canvas provides paid material (for a subscription) and writes normal things there, referring primarily to Chinese sources. And this nonsense is neither in the paid nor in the free version.
      It looks like a stupid copy-paste from the Russian language site of some informals who referred by impudence to the canvas.
  5. badger2011
    0
    17 June 2011 22: 03
    Demonzz, select publication 2011-02 at http://www.kanwa.com/defr/, and there will be a PLA Air Forces's Bomber Fleet Downsizing Sharply heading
    So you watched inattentively)))
    1. Demonzz
      +1
      18 June 2011 04: 15
      What a nightmare ..... You're right. Although the article is not so stupidly written, but what is stated here coincides in places. Errors were added to her by a poor electronic transfer.
      I did not expect such a .... completely yellow article from the canvas.
  6. alexandriazasa
    0
    20 June 2011 00: 53
    Great discounts in your city - http://bit.ly/iOg0Z3
  7. NickitaDembelnulsa
    +1
    10 December 2011 16: 01
    Yes, as it can be called long-range aviation, an aircraft of the 50s that does not have missile defense systems, with an outdated aiming and navigation system limited by bomb load ... The Chinese could have stolen something newer.
  8. 443190
    +1
    11 January 2012 01: 59
    The other day there was an article right there about new airplanes ... Here the authors can’t deceive each other in any way .... And the airplanes simply began to hide better ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"