Military Review

The militia asked to introduce peacekeeping troops to the east of Ukraine

108
According to RIA "News", the press secretary of the national mayor of Slavyansk, Stella Khorosheva, said in an interview with the Latvian radio station Baltkom that the deployment of peacekeeping troops would help to avoid “more blood” and stabilize the situation in south-eastern Ukraine.

It is worth recalling that after the inauguration of Petro Poroshenko, the Ukrainian security forces strenuously fired Slavyansk from artillery and Grad installations.

According to Khorosheva, the issue of bringing in peacekeeping forces should be resolved with the involvement of the public, and not just the Ukrainian government. “If peacekeeping troops help to avoid large bloodshed, please assist in their introduction,” she told the public.

Khorosheva noted that civilians, including children, were killed as a result of continuous shelling of the city.

Earlier, representatives of the militias said that the Ukrainian security forces continue to fire on the city of Slavyansk and the suburbs with the help of howitzers, self-propelled mortar installations "Tulip" and volley fire systems "Grad".
Photos used:
http://ria.ru/
108 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Arberes
    Arberes 10 June 2014 11: 23
    +65
    I dedicate these lines to the militias!

    MOTOROLA.

    Bloody news compilation.
    You're alive and hero, I'm glad you!
    Again on the screen MOTOROLA-
    Donetsk army soldier!

    Your voice is kind and calm,
    Short, business report.
    You're alive, buddy MOTOROLA !!!
    Fight and live-soldier!

    My heart will calm me down
    Sure, tired look.
    But still be careful?
    God bless you - SOLDIER!

    I watched this fighter’s comments on TV several times. Involuntarily, I caught myself thinking that I sincerely rejoice at this MAN with each of his appearances on the screen.
    1. Gxash
      Gxash 10 June 2014 11: 30
      +22
      Good words. Beautiful.

      Stella Khorosheva's words echoed in my head like "PO-MO-GI-TE !!!" ... The last hope.

      If, under our chairmanship, peacekeeping troops (preferably Russian) are deployed in the UN Security Council, this will be a huge victory for the People and a big ... nonhumans like Lyashko or Yarosh.

      And let Poroshenko strangle himself ...
      1. zanoza
        zanoza 10 June 2014 11: 43
        +19
        No one will introduce peacekeepers today. That is the reality.
        At the UN, these thoughts are blocked by the United States and its satellites. They need a war, as a reason for pressure on Russia.
        And according to the actions of Poroshenko, who in words "for peace", but in practice pulls the trigger, it is clear that he received clear instructions from the United States to resolve the problem of eastern Ukraine by force.
        1. GDP
          GDP 10 June 2014 11: 45
          +35
          "US Vice President Joe Biden personally called the President of Ukraine.
          The Vice President ... emphasized the urgent need for immediate dialogue with opposition leaders in order to respond to the legitimate concerns of the protesters and come up with strong proposals for political reform. He called on the president ... to withdraw government forces and demonstrate maximum restraint. The vice president made it clear that the US condemns violence from any side, but that the government is particularly responsible for de-escalating the situation. "
          -
          Do not believe? And if I say that the call was February 18, and the president was Yanukovych?
          1. Apologet.Ru
            Apologet.Ru 10 June 2014 12: 04
            +17
            hi
            Dear colleagues!
            You just need to understand that Donbass occupies the 3-th place in Europe in shale gas deposits.
            In connection with this, the last appointments to the composition of a private gas company took place (Biden’s son, friend of his son Kerry and the ex-president of Poland headed a gas company in Ukraine - http://www.mk.ru/economics/2014/05/14/syin -baydena-drug-syina-kerri-i-eksprezide
            nt-polshi-vozglavili-gazovuyu-firmu-na-ukraine.html).
            Promises to transfer development rights have occurred under Yanukovych.
            After Zavgar escaped, these promises were confirmed by the junta.
            And the arrival of mercenaries from the private pi_ndosovsk PMC Greystone and Academi was connected, most likely, not to participate in the database against the militia of Slavyansk, but to protect the territory of the deposits, but it did not work, unrest began in the Donbass.
            This also explains the loans from the IMF and the obstinacy of the pi_ndos, the junta, and now Parasha, in relation to the prevention of federalization.
            Since, in this case, local residents and authorities, they will NOT ALLOW shale gas production, because this will lead to an ecological catastrophe with the extinction of these territories, in the full sense of the word http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature= player_detailpage & v = q3YJitMBHjw.
            But you are well aware of the leverage they will receive for influencing Russia and Western business if they FINALLY resolve the shale issue in Ukraine, which, in the current geopolitics, is literally a matter of life or death for them.
            Therefore, in their life they will NOT spare neither the life of Ukrainians, nor the life of Russians in any quantities necessary for this ...
            1. mackonya
              mackonya 10 June 2014 12: 29
              -6
              And how do you allow me to ask for such information, and as far as I know, large initial investments are needed to develop such deposits, the process of rupture of non-repetitive is quite expensive.
              1. thimble
                thimble 10 June 2014 12: 59
                +3
                Quote: mackonya
                Where did such information come from?

                You need to read the press and the Internet. It is near Slavyansk that they are going to develop. Here are some links to get you started: eco.slaviansk.com; http://stockinfocus.ru/2014/04/28/prichina-obstanovki-v-slavyanske-mestorozhdeni
                e-slancevogo-gaza /;
                slavinfo.dn.ua ›News› Shale gas will kill Donbass;
                112.ua ›... slancevyy-gaz ... besporyadkov-v-slavyanske ...
                In general, the entire Internet is littered with reports of plans for shale gas production in the Donbass.
                1. mackonya
                  mackonya 10 June 2014 14: 16
                  -5
                  Your links do not provide useful information to me. I can give you a hundred pages, where residents of some US states also oppose the production of shale gas. I’m interested in precisely on the basis of what research the conclusion was made that this field occupies the 3rd place in reserves.
                  1. thimble
                    thimble 10 June 2014 14: 31
                    +1
                    A young man, if you are interested, then with little effort you will find there would be a desire. And about 3rd place in my comment there was nothing - this is not for me.
                    I have about shale gas in the Donbass. By the way, the son of Vice President Biden joined the board of directors of a Ukrainian gas company. Does this mean anything to you?
                    1. mackonya
                      mackonya 10 June 2014 15: 18
                      0
                      Damn, and why I am always considered a "stupid lump". I know about this fact, just below in the comments I expressed my opinion on this matter.
                  2. Apologet.Ru
                    Apologet.Ru 10 June 2014 14: 34
                    +1
                    hi
                    Dear mackonya! They advised you
                    You need to read the press and the Internet.
                    ... Type in the search engine "shale gas in Donbass" and you will immediately find everything. what interests you, incl.
                    According to the US Department of Energy, Ukraine has the third largest shale gas deposits in Europe (1,2 trillion cubic meters).
                    http://www.gazeta.ru/business/2014/04/29/6013833.shtml
                    1. mackonya
                      mackonya 10 June 2014 15: 05
                      +1
                      Thank you, of course, but you have already read it and you know it was not impressed, no offense, of course, but this quote just perfectly describes all attempts to change the meaning of this situation in Ukraine "According to the US Department of Energy, Ukraine has the third largest shale gas deposits in Europe (1,2 trillion cubic meters) "- I want to say, and then thunderous applause and the curtain closes. I would not be seduced by such research, and for each his own choice.
                    2. Flexsus
                      Flexsus 11 June 2014 00: 32
                      +1
                      Quote: Apologet.Ru
                      According to the US Department of Energy, Ukraine has the third largest shale gas deposits in Europe (1,2 trillion cubic meters). http://www.gazeta.ru/business/2014/04/29/6013833.shtml

                      they cannot figure out their reserves, they made a mistake in their reserves 30 times ascribed more ...
                  3. mackonya
                    mackonya 10 June 2014 14: 47
                    +3
                    Ugh trolls, already disgusting, please provide a link, but they are a minus to me. Here is a link to which many refer here
                    http://economics.lb.ua/state/2013/06/11/205583_ukraina_dvenadtsataya_mire.html

                    I’ll just tell you this, this information of the Ministry of Energy of Ukraine, but even there the dates of production are indicated no earlier than 2022, and the reserves of the deposits themselves are insignificant and cannot be seriously taken as a factor for Ukraine’s energy independence. Let me remind you that there is still a lot of 2014 and until 2022, so it’s possible, but not worth taking seriously, to consider that the battles for Slavyansk are largely determined by the shale gas field. The Syrian conflict was also considered for the most part because of the transport hub of oil and gas, but as many understand the geopolitical background, it is much deeper and broader. In addition, it is not worth mentioning the SG field in Slavyansk, you thereby devalue the heroism of the militias who are fighting for their homeland and their future, and not at all for the SG underground. And then I began to notice articles in foreign media of the second echelon, saying that Russia helps the Donbass only because of strategic reserves of SG, so please do not focus on SG in Ukraine. Such a simple human request!
                    1. Goodmen
                      Goodmen 10 June 2014 15: 13
                      +1
                      Quote: mackonya
                      In addition, it is not worth mentioning the SG field in Slavyansk, you thereby devalue the heroism of the militias who are fighting for their homeland and their future, and not at all for the SG underground. And then I began to notice articles in foreign media of the second echelon, saying that Russia helps the Donbass only because of strategic reserves of SG, so please do not focus on SG in Ukraine. Such a simple human request!


                      Here such a hassle turns out ...
                      Militias really fight for their homeland! And no one is going to belittle their feat!
                      But P.Indos climb to Ukraine not only because of reorienting the European market from Russia to itself, to shit Russia, but also because of fossils, including and the gas that they will then pump to the same Europe ... This is natural for the distant future ...
                      By the way, in Poland there are more shale gas reserves than in Ukraine ...

                      but about shale gas, here everything is written in detail. What, where, how, why, why, how much and when ...

                      http://investments.academic.ru/1400/Сланцевый_газ

                      and where are the trolls?))))
                      1. mackonya
                        mackonya 10 June 2014 15: 28
                        +1
                        Thanks for the link, but there are more "copy-paste" from other resources. And the trolls because in 1-2 seconds (I refreshed the page) minuses were thrown, and 1-2 people wrote comments to me personally for which thanks to them, even though there is someone to discuss with. Here, after all, many "run" watching someone "minus" and without reading, they also beat a minus. I'm not against the minuses, I somehow don't cough from them, but there is no constructive conversation when the minus is silently. By the way, many here will think about what link I am asking, but any where there will be official research results, where there will be information on geological exploration, methods for calculating the reserve, comparison by composition and geolocation, and not just news.
                      2. boomerang.
                        boomerang. 10 June 2014 20: 17
                        0
                        In response to; By the way, in Poland there are more shale gas reserves than in Ukraine ...
                        And in Poland there is no shale gas sufficient for production. They hoped it would be enough for 300 years, but they had drilled 52 wells and there wasn’t! Refused to drill more. There, maybe it will work in Slavyansk. Already started drilling in Kharkov and Lviv reg.
                      3. boomerang.
                        boomerang. 10 June 2014 20: 17
                        0
                        In response to; By the way, in Poland there are more shale gas reserves than in Ukraine ...
                        And in Poland there is no shale gas sufficient for production. They hoped it would be enough for 300 years, but they had drilled 52 wells and there wasn’t! Refused to drill more. There, maybe it will work in Slavyansk. Already started drilling in Kharkov and Lviv reg.
                  4. mackonya
                    mackonya 10 June 2014 15: 09
                    0
                    People, if you like to put the minuses so much, for God's sake. I will regularly add comments about the SG and put downsides as much as you like. And now the facts, as far as I know, the production of shale gas (SG) is more resource-intensive than the "traditional" one, and I will not talk about the duration of the process when it is necessary to gain the necessary "capacity". Therefore, I consider all these articles about LF reserves in Ukraine to be simply "distracting", "not essential." Of course this is my opinion, but I think there will be people who will agree with me. Good luck!
              2. woron333444
                woron333444 10 June 2014 13: 30
                +2
                When they appointed Biden Jr., they themselves announced this. Slavyansk and Mariupol where polygons are already arranged
                1. mackonya
                  mackonya 10 June 2014 14: 59
                  0
                  I assure you, the inclusion of the son of the US Vice President in the directorship is not at all connected with the reserves and future production of LFG in Ukraine, here the matter is much simpler. The usual sense of individual profit, as many know, the current Ukrainian oligarchs have made money on the re-export of Russian gas, including Tymoshenko. You can find out how it became possible to make money on re-export in numerous articles on this site and in many others. If you noticed now there is a stubborn struggle for the pricing of Russian gas supplied to Ukraine. And it is clear why, Ukraine will have a favorable price and pay according to the system "how much you consume, you pay for so much ...". I think everyone has already understood what it is about, but all this is "old as the world." Ukraine will buy in excess of the norm for a low price, and supply this difference to the countries of Eastern Europe, here you will find Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary and even further. Now they want to suspend the construction of South Stream under various pretexts, and it is clear why. If the re-export of gas envisages delivery to those countries through which the South Stream was supposed to pass. Therefore, conversations about SG is of course interesting, but in the short term they are not so relevant.
          2. old man
            old man 10 June 2014 12: 14
            0
            Laughed !!! Yes
      2. Dembel
        Dembel 10 June 2014 12: 11
        +2
        The United Nations will no longer use Russian peacekeepers in the zone of Russian interests. They remember how it was in South Ossetia. In the event of an aggravation of the situation, they will not give us a reason to send troops to protect Russian citizens.
        1. Apologet.Ru
          Apologet.Ru 10 June 2014 12: 22
          0
          hi
          And who will ask them then ???
      3. Blondy
        Blondy 10 June 2014 12: 12
        0
        The Security Council makes decisions unanimously. And how will the US vote?
      4. Val_y
        Val_y 10 June 2014 14: 13
        +1
        And there’s no sense other than Russian,
      5. atos_kin
        atos_kin 10 June 2014 16: 05
        0
        Quote: Gxash
        Inhumans like Lyashko or Yarosh.

        And let Poroshenko strangle himself ...


        Like specially collected bastards with SHSHissing surnames ... dill serpentarium, damn it.
    2. Vyalik
      Vyalik 10 June 2014 11: 36
      +7
      Arberes SU
      Thank you for your sincere wish to one of HEROES. The verses are very good. +++++
    3. Alexandr 2
      Alexandr 2 10 June 2014 11: 37
      +11
      God bless the MOTOROLO !!!
      1. Natalia
        Natalia 10 June 2014 11: 43
        +5
        Should peacekeeping troops be deployed? Definitely, but they must be Russian. Because if you introduce Korean or some other, then we know how it will happen. And as is happening in the Balkans, the KEYFOR troops wanted to spit on the crimes of the Albanians, but if the Serbs are rocking, then all the khan are there, they immediately begin to react.

        If it is Russian peacekeepers, they will be interested in peace and stability.
        If it is someone else's, then the peacekeepers will be on their own (sit out at the bases) and the war itself.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. atalef
          atalef 10 June 2014 11: 50
          +1
          Quote: Natalia
          Should peacekeeping troops be deployed? Definitely, but they must be Russian

          Peacekeeping forces are introduced only by decision of the UN Security Council (forcibly), where the United States, England, France have a veto
          or by agreement of the country (if it is within the framework of the OSCE) - as was the case in Georgia or Moldova
          Do you think Kiev will agree?
          Everything else is called occupation.

          Quote: Natalia
          And as is happening in the Balkans, spit KEYFOR troops

          These are UN troops --- Russia, as a permanent member of the Bez Owls, could raise a question on the topic of why it is silent. As a member of the Soviet Union, Beza could end (by Veto law) the mandate for these troops (which is renewed every 2 years) why not?
          Quote: Natalia
          If it is Russian peacekeepers, they will be interested in peace and stability.

          There will be no Russian peacekeepers there, you should not fly in the clouds - no one will give a mandate for it-- especially in light of the rejection of Crimea
          Quote: Natalia
          If it is someone else's, then the peacekeepers will be on their own (sit out at the bases) and the war itself.

          According to the mandate of the peacekeeping forces - UN troops are forbidden to participate in the conflict and use weapons (except for self-defense)
          1. Natalia
            Natalia 10 June 2014 12: 00
            +1
            Quote: atalef

            There will be no Russian peacekeepers there, you should not fly in the clouds - no one will give a mandate for it-- especially in light of the rejection of Crimea

            winked .... well, there will be no Russian will not be any.
            Quote: atalef
            the rest is called occupation

            ... and also by peace enforcement.
            Quote: atalef
            According to the mandate of the peacekeeping forces - UN troops are forbidden to participate in the conflict and use weapons (except for self-defense)

            Our peacekeepers are the best in this regard, as practice in South Ossetia has shown.

            Well, as applied to the occupation troops, Russia will introduce "occupation" troops if Potroshenko decides to "return" Crimea one day.

            You know the joke
            Tymoshenko: "We need to return Crimea !!!"
            Putin: "We have already returned Crimea, now we need the South-East"
            1. atalef
              atalef 10 June 2014 13: 30
              0
              Quote: Natalia
              well, there won’t be any Russians.

              Of course will not
              Quote: Natalia
              and also by compulsion to the world.

              Mandates, needed, mandates - this is compulsion
              Quote: Natalia
              Our peacekeepers are the best in this regard, as practice in South Ossetia has shown.

              Better of what?
              Any statistics?
              Quote: Natalia
              Well, as applied to the occupation troops, Russia will introduce "occupation" troops if Potroshenko decides to "return" Crimea one day.

              No one will return Crimea. So - boltology, he must say something
              Quote: Natalia
              In general, the UN has lost confidence, now it’s an absolutely corrupt United States

              I would not say - look at the number of anti-Israeli resolutions. I do not like the UN. But it somehow saves the world from a common mess
              Quote: Natalia
              and the main stabilizer of the world at the borders of Russia, are the "occupation" troops of Imperial-Putin Russia.

              And the Israeli - the imperial-Israeli, and the American-imperial-American. It all depends on which side you are looking
              1. Natalia
                Natalia 10 June 2014 13: 42
                0
                Quote: atalef
                Mandates, needed, mandates - this is compulsion

                As practice has shown on 08.08.2008, not everyone needs mandates. If you are strong enough, you do not need a mandate.
                Like the United States, by the way they were the first to demonstrate this.
                Today, the UN is a platform for the exchange of views and no more. It lost its viability when the US was the first to act without a resolution and thereby set an example to the whole world.
                Quote: atalef
                No one will return Crimea. So - boltology, he must say something

                Mikheil Shpili-Vili (saakashvili) also said that we were brothers forever, and that’s how it turned out.
                Quote: atalef
                I would not say - look at the number of anti-Israeli resolutions. I do not like the UN. But it somehow saves the world from a common mess

                You don’t like the UN ... but you can’t talk about this in a rumor, right? But you have a roof (USA).
            2. atalef
              atalef 10 June 2014 13: 30
              0
              Quote: Natalia
              well, there won’t be any Russians.

              Of course will not
              Quote: Natalia
              and also by compulsion to the world.

              Mandates, needed, mandates - this is compulsion
              Quote: Natalia
              Our peacekeepers are the best in this regard, as practice in South Ossetia has shown.

              Better of what?
              Any statistics?
              Quote: Natalia
              Well, as applied to the occupation troops, Russia will introduce "occupation" troops if Potroshenko decides to "return" Crimea one day.

              No one will return Crimea. So - boltology, he must say something
              Quote: Natalia
              In general, the UN has lost confidence, now it’s an absolutely corrupt United States

              I would not say - look at the number of anti-Israeli resolutions. I do not like the UN. But it somehow saves the world from a common mess
              Quote: Natalia
              and the main stabilizer of the world at the borders of Russia, are the "occupation" troops of Imperial-Putin Russia.

              And the Israeli - the imperial-Israeli, and the American-imperial-American. It all depends on which side you are looking
          2. Natalia
            Natalia 10 June 2014 12: 09
            +1
            Quote: atalef
            introduced only by decision of the UN Security Council

            In general, the UN has lost confidence, now it is an absolutely corrupt US sharaga, and the main stabilizer of the world at the borders of Russia is the "occupation" troops of Imperial-Putin Russia.
          3. kare
            kare 10 June 2014 12: 42
            +2
            atalef (3)

            There will be no Russian peacekeepers there, you should not fly in the clouds - no one will give a mandate for it-- especially in light of the rejection of Crimea

            Are you serious .... about rejection?
            or make a reservation?
            I like the term more return of illegally appropriated by betrayal of higher bonzes
            1. atalef
              atalef 10 June 2014 13: 22
              -1
              Quote: kare
              I like the term return of the misappropriated, by betraying higher bonzes

              When I look at myself in the mirror, I really like the same wassat , this does not mean at all - that I will like others. laughing
              1. kare
                kare 10 June 2014 18: 40
                +1
                Narcissism, Alexander, is a vice.
                But I didn’t see much disagreement
                ... or can you all the same for the Khazar Khaganate? belay
        3. urii
          urii 10 June 2014 14: 24
          0
          Well, the peacekeepers tasked with dividing the warring parties has set up a block of posts. let's say Slavyansk. ukropam in order to fuck our peace. first peacekeepers. will they go for it? Well, for the Russians. For sure. They will provoke. They need a war with Russia. And they can’t fight foreign ones. Although hell knows. Which is better .
      2. serega.fedotov
        serega.fedotov 10 June 2014 11: 46
        +7
        Quote: Alexandr 2
        God bless the MOTOROLO !!!

        I’m joining! Lynx unfortunately keep us off ....
        1. Gradus HuK
          Gradus HuK 10 June 2014 12: 05
          +5
          I didn’t know. ETERNAL MEMORY! KINGDOM OF HEAVEN! MOTOR TO BE ALIVE! NEITHER THE SULVES OR THE SHARD! SAVE THE LORD OF ALL RUSSIAN WARRIORS!
      3. Burberry
        Burberry 10 June 2014 12: 10
        +3
        God bless Donbass and all its defenders and residents !!!
    4. 222222
      222222 10 June 2014 11: 43
      +12
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVd9XWHfk2Q#t=21
      militia captured today near Slavyansk two combat-ready GRAD installations. Machines advanced to counter-battery fighting. This information gives hope for the cessation of unrequited artillery shelling of Slavyansk.
      1. Natalia
        Natalia 10 June 2014 11: 48
        +5
        Quote: 222222
        militia captured today near Slavyansk two combat-ready GRAD installations. Machines advanced to counter-battery fighting.

        this is not enough, the GRAD is not t-64, it will not shoot itself ... in addition to the remote coil with the Sh-4 connector, the calculation of sensible sergeants and officers for the correct firing of shots is also needed.
        It is clear that direct fire is much easier to shoot, but firing a shot from a closed firing position is not only more efficient but also safer.
      2. Russ69
        Russ69 10 June 2014 12: 24
        0
        Quote: 222222
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVd9XWHfk2Q#t=21
        militia captured today near Slavyansk two combat-ready GRAD installations. Machines advanced to counter-battery fighting.

        This infe, already a month. And they didn’t capture the launchers, but the ammunition ...
        1. All1
          All1 10 June 2014 12: 58
          0
          10.06.2014/04/17 XNUMX:XNUMX, Slavyansk - The militia captured the Ukrainian installation GRAD. http://vognebroda.net/opolchentsy-zahvatili-ustanovku-grad
    5. major071
      major071 10 June 2014 12: 47
      +7
      In the ruins of houses found a leaf
      Simple, he is torn from a notebook
      In the midst of burning, he is alone in his whiteness
      And dedication to Vysotsky and Vlad ...
      Raised, cleaned the charred edge
      Who are you a poet? Sorry I don’t know the name
      Kohl alive, please get up
      Let's both beat the rhyme
      But the house is silent and smells of death there
      A shell from the "Grad" hit here
      Poet, believe me, I will avenge your enemies
      A path from hell has already been laid for them.
  2. psychologist
    psychologist 10 June 2014 11: 24
    +12
    everything will become clear in the week !! we will know the price of words and our rulers and them !!
    1. Lyubimov
      Lyubimov 10 June 2014 11: 27
      +5
      Rulers should not be judged by their words, but by their actions
    2. Andrew K
      Andrew K 10 June 2014 11: 29
      +2
      And what should happen in the week? I think nothing will happen and everything will be the same. Putin has already made it clear that he will not intervene, especially the world community.
      1. nahalenok911
        nahalenok911 10 June 2014 11: 54
        +1
        Poroshenko decided to organize the evacuation of the population of South-East. Just where? In the newly built ghettos?
    3. SS68SS
      SS68SS 10 June 2014 11: 40
      +1
      Quote: psychologist
      everything will become clear in the week !! we will know the price of words and our rulers and them !!


      The process of introducing peacekeepers Ukrainians will sabotage .... fl for sure ....
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Arberes
      Arberes 10 June 2014 11: 42
      +2
      Quote: psychologist
      everything will become clear in the week !! we will know the price of words and our rulers and them !!

      Yes! The denouement (political) is close! A decision must be made. What will it be ???
      I really want this hell to end.
      For feedback on my work thanks to all!!! I am sincerely glad that I am making my contribution to our common cause!
    6. comprochikos
      comprochikos 10 June 2014 11: 53
      +1
      Dill for the coming holidays can make a dirty trick with human casualties, the day of Russia after all.
    7. The comment was deleted.
  3. Eragon
    Eragon 10 June 2014 11: 25
    -7
    Stella Khorosheva, spokeswoman for the people's mayor of Slavyansk, said in an interview with the Latvian radio station Baltkom that the deployment of peacekeeping forces would help to avoid "more blood" and stabilize the situation in southeastern Ukraine.

    This fool must first think what and whom to blurt out. And in general, who gave her the right to ask the NATO radio station for peacekeeping assistance?
    1. Blondy
      Blondy 10 June 2014 11: 31
      +12
      This fool must first think what and whom to blurt out. And in general, who gave her the right to ask the NATO radio station for peacekeeping assistance?

      In fact, peacekeepers are not asked from radio stations but from the UN Security Council.
      1. Gxash
        Gxash 10 June 2014 11: 41
        +5
        As for the media: today at about 8 am Moscow time, VGTRK correspondents from Slovyansk transmitted over the phone that they saw only 2 foreign media group in the last 3-1 days, and then they took off and dumped with a whistle for a couple of minutes. All other media groups are now there, in their opinion, only Russian.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 10 June 2014 11: 44
          0
          Quote: Gxash
          what they saw in the last 2-3 days only 1 group of foreign media, and then they took off a couple of minutes and fell off with a whistle

          No wonder they don’t need it at all.
          1. atalef
            atalef 10 June 2014 11: 54
            -3
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            No wonder they don’t need it at all

            No, Sanya, they’re just being abducted there regularly. Who in general should risk his life
            Militias first kidnap and put in a jail the foreign media, and then complain - why don’t they go.
            belay
            1. Gradus HuK
              Gradus HuK 10 June 2014 12: 14
              +1
              Who was kidnapped? Provide information. I know that Russian journalists were kidnapped by dill.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. atalef
                atalef 10 June 2014 12: 32
                0
                Quote: GradusHuK
                Who was kidnapped? Provide information. I know that Russian journalists were kidnapped by dill.

                In Slavyansk, protesters abducted two Italian journalists Paul Gogo and Cosimo Attanasio and Belarusian journalist for the newspaper Nowa Dmitri Galko, journalist Denis Kazansky reports on his Facebook page.

                http://news.bigmir.net/ukraine/810740-V-Slavyanske-pohitili-treh-inostrannih-jyr
                nalistov
                American journalist kidnapped in Slavyansk

                http://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2014/04/22/7023304/
                If as an example.
                Both sides suffer from this.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. comprochikos
            comprochikos 10 June 2014 11: 57
            0
            So they compose news, without taking their backs off the chair in the office, or on a call "from the top." Therefore, they do not need to shoot anything.
          4. The comment was deleted.
    2. brace
      brace 10 June 2014 11: 41
      -1
      And you better take a gun, but help. Putin is afraid to help Novorosia, the grandmother is sorry (they will not understand His Kremlin oligarchs). But people need to answer for the population, there are children and women.
      1. Ivan Russky
        Ivan Russky 10 June 2014 12: 02
        +9
        And you better take a gun, but help. Putin is afraid to help Novorosia, the grandmother is sorry (they will not understand His Kremlin oligarchs). But people need to answer for the population, there are children and women.

        Putin leaked Southeast. His only gas and grandmother care for him. And the fact that people die there and sincerely hoped for his support, then he was hit on the drum. All these conversations about Putin waiting for the right moment, that he has his own plan for the liberation of the South-East, just the words of naive cheers of patriots who can only be clever on the couch at the computer instead of really helping people. Tomorrow I’m leaving to help with deeds and not with no umbrella words.
        1. avia1991
          avia1991 10 June 2014 12: 27
          +4
          Quote: Ivan Russian
          Tomorrow I’m leaving to help with deeds and not with no umbrella words.

          Good luck, Ivan! And come back alive and healthy!
  4. FunkschNNX
    FunkschNNX 10 June 2014 11: 25
    +3
    To equip a soldier with ukrovsk means of communication, most likely will refuse to shoot when they find out that civilians have not been evacuated.
    1. Yellow white
      Yellow white 10 June 2014 11: 36
      +2
      they know everything perfectly ...
    2. N.Zero
      N.Zero 10 June 2014 11: 38
      +1
      illusions, illusions ... they all have cellular communications
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. strannik595
      strannik595 10 June 2014 11: 29
      +3
      thank God that now is not the Soviet time, otherwise you would have answered for your vile thing elsewhere, in snot and tears
      1. snifer
        snifer 10 June 2014 12: 47
        0
        hear you yourself rejoice that now is not the Soviet time, and whoever in the snot was still a question, as if he himself would not be there.
        ps you need to understand the banter, the more I deleted it right away, but you managed to vyshrat
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 10 June 2014 11: 35
      +4
      Quote: snifer
      money money rubbish, having forgotten peace and laziness, make money, make money, and the rest is all rubbish (V.V. Putin)

      fool
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. atalef
        atalef 10 June 2014 11: 56
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: snifer
        money money rubbish, having forgotten peace and laziness, make money, make money, and the rest is all rubbish (V.V. Putin)

        fool

        good
  6. sergey32
    sergey32 10 June 2014 11: 26
    +5
    I already wrote the Kazakhs need to be attracted, they have peacekeeping units. By CIS mandate. Russia will assume the support of peacekeepers.
    1. marshes
      marshes 10 June 2014 11: 29
      +1
      Quote: sergey32
      I already wrote Kazakhs must be attracted, they have peacekeeping units

      Ahh ... after the statements of Zhirinovsky and Shtygashev .... Wait ...
      Only by UN mandate.
      1. sergey32
        sergey32 10 June 2014 11: 36
        0
        To my shame, I don’t know what Zhirinovsky said there, and I don’t know any Shtygashev. bully Can you enlighten how this affects the Kazakh peacekeepers?
        1. marshes
          marshes 10 June 2014 11: 41
          0
          Quote: sergey32
          Can you enlighten how this affects the Kazakh peacekeepers?

          Kazakhstan has chosen neutrality in this conflict.
          1. sergey32
            sergey32 10 June 2014 11: 47
            +2
            Therefore, I propose Kazakhstan as a neutral side. In my opinion, a great opportunity to raise international authority for your country.
            1. marshes
              marshes 10 June 2014 11: 59
              0
              Quote: sergey32
              In my opinion, a great opportunity to raise international authority for your country.

              The UN mandate will be, then we will participate, and so it will look like an occupation.
              1. sergey32
                sergey32 10 June 2014 12: 17
                0
                Occupation ??? With the consent of the conflicting parties. Strong!!! It looks like rape by mutual agreement. wassat
          2. UFO
            UFO 10 June 2014 11: 52
            +2
            Quote: marshes
            Kazakhstan has chosen neutrality in this conflict.

            Very clever. I approve. hi
  7. Agat
    Agat 10 June 2014 11: 26
    +3
    And "Bloody Peter" made a peacekeeping gesture "Poroshenko ordered the creation of a humanitarian corridor in the area of ​​the punitive operation" ("Russian Spring").
    Or even stop the punitive operation "ATO" ?! And it will be counted in the High Court!
  8. mig31
    mig31 10 June 2014 11: 27
    0
    It is a legitimate requirement, what is the problem, or few victims among the civilian population !!! ??? .....
    1. Lyubimov
      Lyubimov 10 June 2014 11: 39
      0
      Well, maybe immediately organize an American military base in Slavyansk !? Then exactly the ATO will stop. It’s a pity for people, yes, it’s very a pity, and what is now to give the country to the West because of this, where they will immediately feel good?
      Talk about the deployment of peacekeeping troops, IMHO I think is treacherous.
      The introduction of peacekeeping troops at the moment, into the territory of the former Ukraine, is a global loss for Russia, and the number of deaths in the ATO will be only small flowers
  9. GUKTU92
    GUKTU92 10 June 2014 11: 33
    -4
    Given the fact that a legitimate (recognized by the international community) president has been elected in Ukraine, the request for the introduction of peacekeepers should come only from the legitimate authorities, alas.
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 10 June 2014 14: 29
      +2
      Quote: GUKTU92
      elected legitimate (recognized by the international community) president
      Really legitimate Ukrainian president, if you approach "de jure", is now sitting in the Rostov region, and is called Yanukovych!
      And this same Yanukovych in February turned to Putin with a request to introduce a peacekeeping contingent. Much more legitimate ?!
      Poroshenko, if we consider Ukrainian laws, was elected with all the possible violations in this situation: they generally had no right to hold elections!
  10. Alexandr42
    Alexandr42 10 June 2014 11: 34
    -14
    Spit Putin on Russian blood. He buys for Ukrainians with Ukrainians. How can you trade with the Nazis ?!
    1. zol1
      zol1 10 June 2014 12: 01
      0
      June 22, 1941, when the Nazi boot stepped on our land, trains loaded with wheat were coming from the USSR to Germany!
      1. Russ69
        Russ69 10 June 2014 12: 27
        0
        Quote: zol1
        June 22, 1941, when the Nazi boot stepped on our land, trains loaded with wheat were coming from the USSR to Germany!

        Until June 22, Germany also fulfilled its contracts and cargoes in the USSR went before the war ...
  11. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 10 June 2014 11: 36
    +7
    He wrote already, shortly like:
    We must bring in troops. Introduced. We won. Hundreds and thousands of our boys died. They will fight against people like us. The words that the Ukrop army is an army of suckers and we are their one left-delirium. This is our army, exactly the same. The whole point of Russian history is that you can drink from Ivan ... potatoes in the garden, shit under his windows, yell that he is on the street, sneak up on his bride. Rus suffers. But then there comes a certain moment and everyone is shocked. An unthinkable number of examples when Russian people, ordinary in ordinary life, perform feats that are inconceivable from the point of view of another Western civilization. Ukrainians are us, Slavs and Rus. In the case of the introduction of troops, we will get a war with the occupiers. And among the Ukrainian people there is a sea of ​​heroes. Real, not current "heroes". Then hundreds of times more will perish than are perishing now.
    My younger brother served a year ago. Suppose he serves now. And if there was talk now that he would go to war in the east of Ukraine, I would be against it. And he would have been in only one case - if he had gone VOLUNTEER. That is, if it were HIS choice, he should risk his life for the idea of ​​his choice. But the amazing thing: now not regular Russian troops are fighting there, but VOLUNTEERS.
    Ps Would there be a hunchback at the helm now or would Russia fight like it would?
  12. surovts.valery
    surovts.valery 10 June 2014 11: 38
    0
    From the "Russian Spring":
    On Monday, the head of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, Mikhail Koval, said that the process of ending the armed confrontation is ongoing in eastern Ukraine.

    He wanted to say - confrontations from militias. He hopes that soon there will be no one to confront.
    There they seem to have come complete cynicism and hypocrisy. Porosenko holds contact group meetings, at which everyone allegedly supports his plan. And who read this plan or published it?
    This is a "peace plan" implemented by military force, and mainly through the commission of war crimes.
  13. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 10 June 2014 11: 38
    -15
    Even I.V. Stalin, through other countries, traded with the Fuhrer the whole war, as well as the Fuhrer, with her expediency her mother!
    1. muginov2015
      muginov2015 10 June 2014 11: 41
      +6
      What a depth of knowledge! The source in pzhalst studio!
    2. Lyubimov
      Lyubimov 10 June 2014 11: 49
      +1
      You would have thrown off the source, where did you find out when you say such nonsense
    3. Wiruz
      Wiruz 10 June 2014 11: 49
      0
      It seems to me, or today you did not drink the pills that the doctor prescribed you lol
    4. papik09
      papik09 10 June 2014 12: 06
      +2
      Quote: kapitan281271
      Even I.V. Stalin, through other countries, traded with the Fuhrer the whole war as did the Fuhrer.

      And you attended the deals? Or where? That is, or how? In fact, unverified info does not need to be distributed, because you can rake in addition to the minuses and candelabra wassat
  14. Lyubimov
    Lyubimov 10 June 2014 11: 46
    +1
    The title of the article is clumsy, in the spirit of idiotic ntsh sensations, not the militias are asking, and the spokeswoman said something to some Latvian radio station. The title of the article and what is written in it do not correspond to each other.
  15. Wiruz
    Wiruz 10 June 2014 11: 47
    -4
    Not the first time they are already asking. It would be necessary to introduce
    1. Lyubimov
      Lyubimov 10 June 2014 11: 50
      -1
      And if they ask you to drop a nuclear bomb on Kiev, you also have to do it !?
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 10 June 2014 11: 55
        +2
        There is a lot of nuclear. Something of high precision would be in the subject, but only in a specific building.
        1. papik09
          papik09 10 June 2014 12: 08
          +1
          Quote: Wiruz
          There is a lot of nuclear. Something of high precision would be in the subject, but only in a specific building.

          I agree, nuclear is not necessary, but the one that was tested (volume explosion) would not hurt feel
  16. plotnikov561956
    plotnikov561956 10 June 2014 11: 49
    0
    In the Donbass, 200 thousand formidable miners ... and the weapons didn’t go anywhere ... they weren’t taken to Kiev ... so think about this place ...
    1. sub307
      sub307 10 June 2014 11: 57
      +1
      Yes, perhaps, they are not "eager" to defend their choice. Most likely, they hoped that Russia would "pull under its wing", "put pressure" on Kiev. But no, no ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. avia1991
      avia1991 10 June 2014 12: 17
      0
      Here is the article:
      http://rusvesna.su/recent_opinions/1402090057
      Read, if you do not have time, I recommend. Nevertheless, the views of opponents are also useful to know.
      Quote: plotnikov561956
      here and think in this place ...
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. mazhnikof.Niko
      mazhnikof.Niko 10 June 2014 13: 29
      -1
      Quote: plotnikov561956
      ... here and think in this place ...

      I thought ... nothing but: "Long live the miners of Donbass! ... And then: God save KYIV."
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. mazhnikof.Niko
        mazhnikof.Niko 10 June 2014 18: 09
        0
        Well, here sits, somewhere agent huh .... th, and sculpts cons. Why did the miners of Donbass not please !? Or so much maida ... that you can't even see the word "miner". Or argue the cons!
  17. February
    February 10 June 2014 11: 55
    +7
    I would like to believe that Strelkov captures heavy weapons (tanks, howitzer, hail), for the possibility of supplying their counterparts from our side under the cover of captured ones. And as a result of strengthening the borders of "NOVOROSSIA" After all, today it was announced about the closure of the Airport, it means there is a possibility of its control. The quieter you go, the further you'll get.
  18. Rubmolot
    Rubmolot 10 June 2014 11: 56
    0
    And who commands peacekeeping operations in the world?
    Who will be "bad" and who will be "good" after the entry of peacekeeping troops into Ukraine?
    Probably everyone understands the answers to the questions ...
  19. Ross
    Ross 10 June 2014 11: 58
    0
    Quote: Arberes
    I dedicate these lines to the militias!

    MOTOROLA.

    Bloody news compilation.
    You're alive and hero, I'm glad you!
    Again on the screen MOTOROLA-
    Donetsk army soldier!

    Your voice is kind and calm,
    Short, business report.
    You're alive, buddy MOTOROLA !!!
    Fight and live-soldier!

    My heart will calm me down
    Sure, tired look.
    But still be careful?
    God bless you - SOLDIER!

    I watched this fighter’s comments on TV several times. Involuntarily, I caught myself thinking that I sincerely rejoice at this MAN with each of his appearances on the screen.

    +++++ I agree completely. The real commander and true hero of Russia.
  20. STEALS
    STEALS 10 June 2014 11: 59
    +10
    The real thoughts of Parasha:

  21. nivander
    nivander 10 June 2014 12: 00
    0
    during the Second World War any infantry battalion of the Wehrmacht. and any infantry battalion of the Red Army would have taken Slavyansk per day. It was just that the soldiers of that era had high motivation and there were no loans for office equipment
  22. rapid1934
    rapid1934 10 June 2014 12: 03
    +3
    I repeat my words for hot heads. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO ENTER THE RUSSIAN MILITARY TO UKRAINE. BY ENTERING THE TROOPS FOR THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE WE WILL BECOME OCCUPIERS. They will have a MOTIV-FIGHT WITH OCCUPIERS. And then the Ukrainian army will fight. Now they don’t want to shoot their people. OCCUPIERS IS ANOTHER CASE.
    FULL-SCALE HELP IS NEEDED BY ALL KINDS OF WEAPONS. Strelkov himself says what he needs.
    I think ordinary people are ready to give their pennies to help the southeast. And Russia can find the necessary weapons and quietly transfer the DNI and LC to the Silently.
    IT'S TIME.
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 10 June 2014 12: 34
      +3
      Quote: rapid1934
      IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO ENTER THE RUSSIAN MILITARY TO UKRAINE. BY ENTERING THE TROOPS FOR THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE WE WILL BECOME OCCUPIERS.

      You can’t enter, yes, found out. But where did this statement come from? !! And I’ll tell you: the Americans launched it after the first assault on Slavyansk on 24.04.2014, when ours began the sudden exercises. To guarantee your safety!
  23. Leshka
    Leshka 10 June 2014 12: 08
    0
    the most important thing is not for the NATO
  24. STEALS
    STEALS 10 June 2014 12: 08
    +3
    I was amazed by the fact that when there was a direct bridge with refugees from Ukraine with those who remained in Slavyansk, that among many women there were peasants with typical faces "my house is on the edge" ... And so ... There is one of the refugees hello I passed it on to my little son, who stayed in Slavyansk with his mother ...

    Before bringing in peacekeeping troops, it is necessary to put such "moyahataskrai" under arms. And who refuses - to shoot.





  25. avia1991
    avia1991 10 June 2014 12: 14
    +6
    People are dying and dying. But the "red line" apparently has not been passed yet? After all, "RUSSIA! YOURS !! DOES NOT DROP !!!"
    I wish I hadn’t heard that. Or rather, it would be better if HE hadn’t said that.
    Without introducing troops, you can still provide effective help! Only need to act! And do not pretend.
  26. Noctis
    Noctis 10 June 2014 12: 24
    0
    oh my god. I'm tired. I tried to leave to Ukraine on a leisure trip. did not miss ... damn, dig dig chtol ??
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 10 June 2014 14: 40
      0
      Have you tried to communicate with locals? Somehow people go by ..
  27. Giant thought
    Giant thought 10 June 2014 12: 29
    +2
    Yes, you need to try everything that can help the people of New Russia. This option will not work with peacekeepers, it is necessary to try another. Under a lying stone, the water does not run.
  28. nicolai64
    nicolai64 10 June 2014 12: 29
    +3
    But what about our CSTO and its peacekeeping forces. The Kazakhs somehow abruptly stepped aside, and the Belarusians with the Old Man somehow began to support this junta. If only they would not touch us. Only if you finish with Ukraine, then get ready! You will be the next. Here are the Slavs and their land. Where are the general statements about the cessation of hostilities, where is the anger of their peoples. Something from the Kazakhs is not a single line about this. And so they cut off piece by piece from Russia, and we sit and think that it will carry us. But it will not carry, this fascist infection is tenacious. Immediately it is necessary to destroy in the bud, and not look that someone will say something about Russia. Here the mattresses do not look at anyone, do their job and do not care about the UN and the world! It is necessary to save the Slavic world, and not to rant!
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 10 June 2014 14: 00
      0
      Quote: nicolai64
      But what about our CSTO and its peacekeeping forces. Kazakhs somehow abruptly stepped aside

      Ukraine has not attacked any of the CSTO member countries, therefore, there is no reason to send troops. Moreover, to someone else's territory. This is "de jure" .. But in reality, Kazakhstan immediately moved aside - even because of the Crimea. Batko is a separate song altogether ..
      I agree with you, of course. Still, "to reach the top".
  29. Dbnfkmtdbx
    Dbnfkmtdbx 10 June 2014 12: 32
    0
    It is necessary to tolerate a little and the United States will lose the geyserk in Europe already it begins to reach people how much benefit they give to China and, to put it mildly, it annoys them and Russia actually doesn’t take any measures against Europe, I think it’s not too late yet, you understand Bulgarians and Serbs bros their mother generally a campaign out of poverty never get out fool angry
  30. navara399
    navara399 10 June 2014 12: 38
    0
    Winners are not judged. Several sabotage squads of "polite night men" with precise "polite" missile strikes. And it is unlikely that the right-wing sections will remain there, and if the army is not touched, then they will not twitch. Dumped, they then understand that this is not their war.
  31. Tanechka-clever
    Tanechka-clever 10 June 2014 12: 40
    +2
    "The introduction of peacekeeping troops will help to avoid" more bloodshed "and stabilize the situation in the south-east of Ukraine." - the introduction of peacekeeping forces should be decided really without the participation of Kiev. Today, behind the back of the Kiev junta, there is a MONSTER - American exclusivity, which today alone decides who to execute and whom to have mercy. Today it is already scary to look at the destruction. who brought the United States with Bandera punishers to Donbass, it is scary to look at the brutally murdered unarmed children and old people. How long will Russia look at this, and if tomorrow something happens that cannot be corrected. How then will we celebrate the 70th anniversary of the Great Victory - and will we not be ashamed and shameful for today.

    .. Malchish looked out: the same horseman is standing at the window. Only a thin horse so tired, only a saber bent, dark, only a sap
    shot through, the star is chopped, and the head is tied.
    .. Hey, get up! shouted the rider. - It was half the trouble, and now there is trouble around. Many bourgeois, but not many of ours. Only Malchish sees that one old grandfather a hundred years old came out of the gate.
    .. Boys are beating from dark night to bright dawn. Only one Bad Boy doesn’t fight, but everything walks and looks for how to help the bourgeois.
    .. the bourgeoisie, soon wrote down the Malchish-Plohish in their bourgeoisie and gave him a whole barrel
    jam and a whole basket of cookies.
    .. - Cheating! - shouted Malchish-Kibalchish. .. .. Chained the Boy in heavy chains. They put Malchish in a stone tower.
    .. The Chief Bourgeois thought for a long time, and then he came up with and said: We will destroy this Boy. But let him first tell us all of their Military Secret.
    ..Why, Malchish, and all the prisons are full, and all the hard labor are full, and all the gendarmes are on the corners, and all the troops are on their feet, but we have no rest neither on bright day nor on dark night?
    .. The bourgeoisie left, but soon returned back: No, the Chief Bourgeois, Malchish-Kibalchish did not reveal to us
    Military Secrets. He laughed in our faces.
    .. There is, - he says, - and a powerful secret in the strong Red Army. And whenever you attack, there will be no victory for you.

    "We could only last day and night" - THE BOY SAID.
    And when the main forces come
    Today, to help the Donbass militias, we’ll continue to look like Russian blood is pouring on Russian soil and watch how the heroes fight and die, but hope and wait when - THE BASIC FORCES are suitable
  32. Russ69
    Russ69 10 June 2014 13: 20
    0
    Parashka also asks for help and wants to punish Russia ...

    MOSCOW, June 10 - RIA Novosti. President of Ukraine Petro Proshenko in his first interview with Time magazine as president of Ukraine said that he wants to punish Russia for the "tragedy" that happened to his country, but sees no other option but to enter into dialogue with Moscow.
    "Perhaps some Ukrainians want to see Sweden or Canada as their neighbor, but our neighbor is Russia," he said, adding that the need for dialogue with this neighbor is a guarantor of security for his country and is explained solely by the geographic location of Ukraine.
    Vladimir Putin and Petro Poroshenko at an event to mark the 70th anniversary of the Allied landings in Normandy
    According to Poroshenko, the best way to convince Vladimir Putin that Ukraine has the right to exist within its current borders is to build a powerful army and a thriving economy.
    “To be honest, I'm not very interested in what citizen Putin thinks about my country,” Poroshenko continued. He added that he was ready for any help from the West. "We are talking about support in any form, from intelligence to military technology, from blocking our airspace to a naval blockade," he explained.

    РИА Новости http://ria.ru/world/20140610/1011461310.html#ixzz34E4VJ9yN
  33. GUKTU92
    GUKTU92 10 June 2014 13: 44
    0
    Given the fact that a legitimate (recognized by the international community) president has been elected in Ukraine, the request for the introduction of peacekeepers should come only from the legitimate authorities, alas.

    Gentlemen who gave me a minus. Can you explain to me the rules for bringing UN troops into any country according to its charter? Or are you confused by the phrase "legitimate (recognized by the world community) president"? Well, I will surprise you, the UN does not bother! And we are talking about the UN peacekeeping contingent.
  34. kelevra
    kelevra 10 June 2014 15: 47
    0
    The main contingent of peacekeepers should be Russian!
  35. boomerang.
    boomerang. 10 June 2014 20: 01
    0
    Quote: Arberes
    I watched this fighter’s comments on TV several times. Involuntarily, I caught myself thinking that I sincerely rejoice at this MAN with each of his appearances on the screen.

    They still have one militia in Slavyansk, the one who helped the wounded helicopter pilot get out and explained how his own pilot was abandoned. I wish him to stay alive. It was often shown at first in Russia25, but recently there is no show.
    Is he alive? How to find out?
  36. Wolka
    Wolka 11 June 2014 05: 53
    0
    peacekeeping contingents are introduced only by decision of the UN Security Council, but today the de facto UN is under the control of the United States, and therefore you cannot count on any sound decisions of the organization in Ukraine, only sycophanism in front of the Yankees ... hi