Military Review

New modular rifle from SIG Sauer

35


The joint US-German-Swiss group SIG Sauer (a part of SIG Sauer GmbH & Co "and Swiss Arms AG and a North American subsidiary SIG Sauer Inc.) acts as one of the largest manufacturers of small arms weapons. The weapons produced by this group have proven themselves well in various countries of the world: from civil to military and law enforcement, the website reports all4shooters.com.

One of the most popular types of weapons from SIG Sauer - semi-automatic pistols, which are in service with the army and police from around the world. They are used by various types of private security companies, sports shooting clubs, and accurate shooting schools.

The SIG Sauer sports and tactical rifle lines, based on the American super popular AR-15, are well known. As a European addition to this model, technical projects SIG-540 / 550 were used. Professional shooters of Western Europe appreciated small arms of this type.

In 2014, the SIG Sauer group was marked by a new reliable construction series of modular rifles SIG556xi.



By and large, this is still the same SIG-550, but has undergone changes in design and modularity. Distributed the updated weapons to the American branch of the industrial group, and therefore the greatest interest in the new rifle originated in the United States and Canada. The main feature of this rifle is its increased versatility and the novelties of the modular principle, which lead to the convenience of its use.

The new system "Sig Sauer SIG556xi" basically has upper and lower parts of the receiver, made of blued steel, effectively resisting corrosion. The unity of design in this case is provided by the upper part of the receiver, which made it possible to combine the rifles into one series. Rifles may differ in the lower part of the receiver, which provides the possibility of universalization of small arms and, in particular, its use in different countries of the world, in which professional shooters prefer their own standardization of the weapon set. Thanks to this production approach, civilians will not have any problems with the acquisition of "Sig Sauer SIG556xi".

For shooters, a modified platform variation will be available - the SBR, which is distinguished by a constant butt and barrel with a length of 25,4.

The SIG556xi platform for small arms is distinguished by a three-position gas regulator that ensures reliable use of the weapon in various types of ammunition. The platform allows the addition of weapons such elements as a silencer and a device for leveling gas leaks. Rotating shutter can be easily disconnected from the slide frame. It is one of the components of the change in caliber used.

Replaceable components of this series of weapons is the barrel. It is produced by cold forging steel containing a certain percentage of chromium and molybdenum. The standard length of the barrel, if expressed in inches, is 16 d., But there is also a shortened version, which was already mentioned above - 10 inches (25,4 cm). For special needs, the company has established the release of interchangeable trunks midi-format: 14,5 inches.

Replaceable lower receiver allows you to use the following types of ammunition: 5.56x45mm (.223 Remington), 7.62xXNNUMXmm or .39 AAC "Blackout". Calibers of all types are capable of “servicing” the lower part of the receiver with the receiver STANAG 300 store for standard types of AR-4179 rifle magazine. Such universality has already received high marks from professional shooters. There is another option - the use of the Kalashnikov assault rifle magazine of the 15xXNNUMXmm caliber. This option even received the special name "SIG7.62xi Russian".



The “Russian” version of SIG556xi makes it possible to build bridges between old-style ammunition and new-type small arms. Many units that did not have time to part with large volumes of cartridges of caliber 7.62x39mm, in principle, with enthusiasm can take a new rifle. In fact, its appearance makes it possible to save quite well by refusing to dispose of old ammunition, if such ammunition meets the security parameters for the statute of limitations. The use of various variants of ammunition will allow you to use the enemy’s captured stores and cartridges - a very convenient option, because you will not have to change weapons for their use.

Small arms SIG556xi has a 2-sided magazine latch, a fuse and a slide delay. This equipment is made with the aim of enabling the convenient use of weapons. Modularity and interchangeability of weapon components are important parameters.

The factory version of the configuration is a folding stock, made by Swiss technology. It is made from polymeric materials, which reduces the overall weight of the weapon. The stock at the request of the owner can be easily replaced with a telescopic version with the main guide M1913 or a butt of a fixed type rifle AR-15.

Guides, made of aluminum, are located along the entire length of the upper part of the receiver. This is a variant of the Picatinny type MIL-STD-1913, which includes aiming devices and is ready to take over the installation of optical elements for aiming and more accurate firing. For the forearm of the weapon, three types of materials are provided: in addition to the above-mentioned aluminum and polymer compounds, such material as carbon fiber is used. Picatinny rail can also be used to install additional accessories.

The configuration of the trigger mechanism allows the shooter to easily switch to the fast-fire version mode and return to the semi-automatic version. This will effectively solve the problems faced by the owners of rifles. Manufacturers note that civilian rifle lines are completed in such a way that they could not be modularly converted into military versions. But at the disposal of civilian owners, there will be a fully automatic 10-inch rifle barrel. Such weapons will be equipped with a stabilization system to ensure the quality control of the weapon in the process of firing from different positions.



According to preliminary data, civilians will be able to purchase a SIG556xi rifle in the US market. Its price will be about $ 2000, although this is the price of the base model, which does not take into account the cost of a number of components. Sports and hunting clubs in the United States have already expressed a desire to purchase a series of rifles of this type for their needs.

But the entry of the European versions of this weapon from the "Sig Sauer" group will take about half a year to come. If you believe the data that became available to journalists during the exhibition "IWA 2014", held in Germany, then sales of European rifles will start in January 2015.

Photos used:
SIG SAUER GmbH & Co
35 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Asan Ata
    Asan Ata 9 June 2014 09: 15
    +2
    I liked the versatility. We must try 7.62x39mm!
    1. koosss
      koosss 9 June 2014 12: 42
      0
      a truly modern rifle, the modularity is impressive, in the video it is well shown
      1. the47th
        the47th 9 June 2014 13: 18
        +1
        Modularity is practically the same as Stoner's original AR-15. Colt just decided to give up on modularity in production M16s, and produced different rifles. SIG just decided to go back to basics with their own improvements.
  2. Alexander.B
    Alexander.B 9 June 2014 09: 41
    +7
    As you can see, the WEST has not been interested in increasing the accuracy of firing from the main weapon by changing the design for a long time. Do not increase the power of the main ammunition. The impression that ergonomics became the head of the arms school. Does this mean that the WEST has reached the limit of an assault rifle?

    I am a patriot of Russia, but the M16A2 is very comfortable in the hands: weight distribution, sights and controls are made for me.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 9 June 2014 10: 58
      -3
      The main goal for all modern weapons is modularity. That's what I’ve been talking about for 3 years already. Accuracy indicators and everything basic can be enhanced only by using shell-free ammunition or ammunition with a plastic sleeve. Such a program is in the states of the LSAT. Creating a light machine gun and carbine at its base. True, they decided to abandon the shellless cartridges temporarily and start with cartridges with a plastic sleeve. This, by the way, is not the weapon of the future, but railguns and blasters. And the weapon is multicoliber and modular with shellless cartridges or with plastic at worst. Also, this weapon should be repaired by any fighter right in the field. This is also one of the requirements. As for ergonomics, I will say this. This is one of the main parameters that affect accuracy. In general, I’ll say that small arms will not go anywhere and neither laser nor any other will replace it. Gunpowder will just change; they are already trying to change it to some other substance. Well, the ammunition itself will also change. The bottom line is that the weapons of the future are modular multicoliber, personalization (only the owner can use it) universal (any scope and a lot of lotions should be quickly installed), the highest ergonomics, quickly and easily repaired, with new ammunition (plastic or sleeveless, instead of gunpowder, any other substance) But they are okr (on the same arch they worked out the possibility of repair by any fighter), on the skar they are modular, new cartridges are on fire. And then, starting from everything, they will sculpt weapons that will serve the whole 21st century. Dp for civilians and perhaps also for the army is working out a system such as chtoli alarm when only the owner can use weapons, by the way, this can also be attributed to the TTZ.
      1. Alexander.B
        Alexander.B 9 June 2014 12: 23
        +1
        He. Thus, the dream of all cyber-punk dreamers is realized: super-corporations with their high-tech armies. But for this one event should happen - the final merger of business with power. What Vladimir Vladimirovich does not allow throughout his time at the post of head of the Russian Federation. And as long as there is a mass army, it is easier to fit a person under the machine. Against the army of the State, these corporate guards are thugs like a fly for a cat. In our country, only all kinds of CSNs can afford modularity, etc. I would pay attention to another - the lack of modern standards in the Army, according to which it would be possible to judge the need for certain techniques to equip a soldier and how to use it on the battlefield. What is the positive REAL experience of using modular weapons in the world? I do not mean a platform like AR. I mean modularity, at least in caliber and barrel length. Even the United States is in no hurry to rearm the aforementioned SCARs.
        1. gross kaput
          gross kaput 3 July 2014 23: 43
          0
          So they didn't plan this, SCAR was created according to the requirements and for SOCOM where it is happy and lives on a par with NK416, programs to replace the M16 / M4 were, but they were all curtailed, the main reason is not the desire of the American authorities to pay mad dough for the rearmament of the entire army so far a sample of personal weapons will not appear an order of magnitude superior to "standard" small arms.
      2. tchoni
        tchoni 9 June 2014 16: 08
        +2
        I didn’t quite drive into the advantages of modularity for the user of this device. Can I quickly change the type of ammunition? - is it convenient for the seller - replaced the barrel - sell to China, you need to sell to Russia - again the replacement of the barrel and the shutter elements. It is necessary to sell on the civilian market - the same garbage - is very convenient, but only for the manufacturer and seller. The operator is basically do not care. It’s easier to rearm an army than to change a cartridge.
        The development of small arms should follow the path of their universalization and not modularity. It is necessary to make a machine gun in the size and weight of an assault rifle (ie, increase the magazine capacity, the ability to conduct long aimed continuous fire, improve sights and ease of use) and not try to slap another "wunderwaffe" by creating a transformer.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 9 June 2014 17: 53
          +1
          They’re not changing weapons, but adding an optical sight,
          collimator and night scope, as standard for individual
          infantryman weapons. If two opponents meet the same
          rifle training with the same rifles, then win the shootout,
          most likely one with suitable optics.

          "It is necessary to make a machine gun in the size and mass of an assault rifle"

          Such machine guns have long been equipped in the West: light machine guns
          under the cartridge 5,56. Each US Marine Corps has three (!) Such
          machine gun.
        2. anomalocaris
          anomalocaris 10 June 2014 06: 42
          +3
          The most important advantage of the system is its cost - $ 2000 instead of $ 500. This system has no more advantages. Well, it may bring a feeling of satisfaction to a certain number of couch special forces, who, due to their lack of education, do not understand that a soldier is not fighting alone, has extremely limited load capacity and in real life he does not have time to play a constructor.
      3. bazilio
        bazilio 10 June 2014 09: 52
        0
        Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
        only by use without clad ammunition

        probably you mean sleeveless
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. anomalocaris
        anomalocaris 13 June 2014 07: 37
        +1
        For some reason, I thought that the main purpose of the existence of weapons is to inflict damage on a certain circle of material objects.
        And modularity, what is modularity? So far, no one has clearly explained what kind of goblin a weapon is worth 4-5 times higher than a non-modular counterpart. Well, it makes no sense ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. bazilio
      bazilio 9 June 2014 11: 25
      +3
      Quote: Alexander.B
      As you can see, the WEST has not been interested in increasing the accuracy of firing from the main weapon by changing the design for a long time. Do not increase the power of the main ammunition. The impression that ergonomics became the head of the arms school. Does this mean that the WEST has reached the limit of an assault rifle?

      We raised a serious issue, dear. Let's try to answer briefly.
      Increasing accuracy is a complex problem associated with the structural features of the barrel and ammunition, the accuracy of their manufacture and, as a consequence, their cost. Regarding design changes to improve accuracy, in addition to the classic automation schemes (AK, M-16, HC G-3), there are many alternative schemes. But even if alternative automation schemes are superior in all respects to classical ones, they are unlikely to be used. the main criterion is the price of production and rearmament. and if an alternative automation scheme requires a new cartridge, you can forget about the match for armament. The maximum that alternative systems and new ammunition can achieve is the adoption of special limited-use units as weapons. In the case of the West, add also the factor of unification of ammunition among NATO member countries. And finally, an individual machine. small arms have already reached the point where it is practically impossible to radically improve their performance and it is necessary to apply other physical principles of the weapon
    4. The comment was deleted.
  3. SPLV
    SPLV 9 June 2014 10: 31
    +2
    Distributed

    Introduced.
  4. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 9 June 2014 11: 09
    +1
    On modern small arms should
    be a picattini strap securely attached to the body
    (and preferably directly to the trunk).
    And a set of quick-detachable sights.
    And the design of the weapon itself is secondary.
    1. Roman Vasilenko
      Roman Vasilenko 9 June 2014 12: 28
      +3
      the side mount is much more convenient (you can quickly remove the sight, there is no need to shoot it again after removal, simplicity) is just less publicized.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 9 June 2014 14: 06
        +2
        As far as I know, side mount is a necessary measure.
        And it's hard to believe that over time the sight does not go astray.
        1. Rebus
          Rebus 9 June 2014 16: 01
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          As far as I know, side mount is a necessary measure.
          And it's hard to believe that over time the sight does not go astray.

          Any optical (collimator) sight goes astray, whether it is fixed with a side mount, a dovetail or weaver or picattini straps, due to vibration and accidental impacts during operation ... But the side mount allows you to more rigidly mount sights:
          The advantages of the side bracket is

          1 When removing and installing a sight with an arm, the gun’s shooting point does not change.
          2 The aiming line of the weapon does not close even with the mounted optical sight. When shooting, at the same time you can use the scope and standard sights of the weapon.
          3 Low optical axis, i.e. the ability to set when mounting the adapter plate of the minimum height of the sighting line of the sight above the barrel of the weapon.
          4 It is possible to mount optical sights without rigid weight restrictions
          http://www.opticdevices.ru/product_613.html
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 9 June 2014 17: 44
            +2
            I understand that the side bracket is essentially
            upgrades and is useful for the AK-74 on which to install
            the picattini bar is impossible. But, for example, on
            the new AK-12 strap is present, as with all
            without exception, modern assault rifles.
            It is unlikely that the designers "conspired" by accident and
            design the bar, not the side
            bracket?
            1. Rebus
              Rebus 9 June 2014 19: 51
              +1
              Quote: voyaka uh
              I understand that the side bracket is essentially
              upgrades and is useful for the AK-74 on which to install
              the picattini bar is impossible.

              What are you so attached to the picattini bar? Once again, there are several standards for mounting sights:
              1 "dovetail" (universal mount is used not only in weapons)
              2 plank weaver
              3 lath picattini (picatinny rail)
              In our army, it so happened, the dovetail mount was taken as a basis, and this mount is neither better nor worse than other options. On the Ak-74m, and now it’s the main one in the army, there is a dovetail mount on the left side of the receiver, the whole range of sights is specially designed and adopted, it’s night, collimator and optical, and I don’t understand what kind of bolts to fasten if there is already a mount and regular sights to it.


              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 10 June 2014 00: 13
                +2
                Thanks for the great pics. I have not seen detailed photos before
                of this bracket.
                I will not argue anymore, since I did not hold this AK74 with
                bracket. (Yes, and without an arm - too :), I only shot
                from AK 7.62 more Chinese)
                1. Rebus
                  Rebus 10 June 2014 00: 56
                  0
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  Thanks for the great pics. I have not seen detailed photos before
                  of this bracket.

                  Everything flows, everything changes ...
                  I first saw this bracket when they were drafted into the army, it was 1993, we were given the AKS-74m (it was the calculation number of ZU 23-2), the new 1993 release, it already had an influx for the side bracket:

                  So this is not an innovation, and our reconnaissance company already flaunted with night sights and collimators ...

                  PS
                  And guns ZU 23-2, brought from storage warehouses, 1967 ... laughing
  5. bazilio
    bazilio 9 June 2014 11: 27
    0
    "gas leakage leveling device"
    What kind of device is this? Does anyone have any guesses?
    1. PAM
      PAM 9 June 2014 12: 07
      0
      different barrels (length, caliber), the use of different ammunition even in the same caliber (different manufacturers) and different climatic conditions (humidity, discharge) affect the operation of automation
      "device for leveling gas leaks"
      helps offset all of these changes.
      1. anomalocaris
        anomalocaris 10 June 2014 06: 46
        +1
        What is a gas regulator and why it is needed is clear, but the "device for leveling gas leaks" is not entirely clear. What if there is a new current of the gloomy Swiss genius?
        1. bazilio
          bazilio 10 June 2014 09: 46
          0
          Quote: anomalocaris
          What is a gas regulator and why it is needed is clear, but the "device for leveling gas leaks" is not entirely clear

          Yes Yes. while the only logical conclusion is that in advertising materials they called what kind of new DTK / flame arrester, plus the error of translation into Russian. Where can there be gas leaks in the machine? The chamber - as long as it is locked, there should be no leaks. after unlocking, the leaks do not affect (well, if only they create a powder deposit in the receiver). The gas outlet, gas regulator, gas chamber and gas piston - here again, until the right moment, nothing leaks, and then it is bled. Muzzle? Well, here we can talk about the TDK / arrester.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  6. sub307
    sub307 9 June 2014 11: 39
    0
    "According to preliminary data, civilians will be able to purchase the SIG556xi rifle in the US market. Its price will be about $ 2000 ...".
    Ah, in the Royale market a hunting option
    "SIG556xi Russian".
    interesting to appear?
  7. Cruorvult
    Cruorvult 9 June 2014 11: 57
    +2
    the cost of AK74 is a little more than 10 tr, for 2 kilobax you can buy a 100 series at 7,62 * 39, 5,45. 5,56 and still enough money for a cart of cartridges.

    And so IMHO if the country is small, but you want an effective professional army, then you need high-quality weapons, and if you have a large army, it’s really cheap \ simple \ reliable \ efficient. Those same Americans when the competition for an assault rifle was conducted and the caseless ones tested the g11, but in the end they accepted their ar in the new version of A4.
    1. the47th
      the47th 9 June 2014 21: 47
      0
      AK-74 I would not call low-quality. Here are the artisanal and close to them Egyptian and Chinese assault rifles - this is an example of poor-quality weapons, and all sorts of ragged people are armed with them.
      1. dervis 65
        dervis 65 10 June 2014 05: 11
        0
        Nevertheless, with the presence of large masses in the hostilities, these substandard submachine guns proved themselves. Although I agree that the Russian AK74 in accuracy in single and automatic firing modes showed the best accuracy. Yes and AK74 is easier than AKM that when marching throws when extra kilograms matter.
        1. gross kaput
          gross kaput 4 July 2014 00: 07
          0
          Quote: dervis 65
          Yes and the AK74 is easier than the AKM, which with a march of throws when extra kilograms matter.

          Yeah, as they say with a finger to the sky, AKM is Lighter than AK-74, and 74M is even heavier
          AKM without a 3,1kg magazine - 74 / 74M 3,2 / 3,4, together with the standard AKM BC (3 stores of 180 rounds) 7kg and 74M (4 stores of 300 rounds) 7,4. So a 74 win will only be with an equal number of rounds and magazines. From something like that.
      2. dervis 65
        dervis 65 10 June 2014 05: 11
        0
        Nevertheless, with the presence of large masses in the hostilities, these substandard submachine guns proved themselves. Although I agree that the Russian AK74 in accuracy in single and automatic firing modes showed the best accuracy. Yes and AK74 is easier than AKM that when marching throws when extra kilograms matter.
  8. kplayer
    kplayer 9 June 2014 14: 37
    +1
    SIG556 has enough time in the US market for civilian and police use (semi-automatic version), the military will not be interested in it even now, it is not produced in Switzerland itself.
  9. Svetovod
    Svetovod 9 June 2014 16: 25
    0
    [quote = Alexey Prikazchikov] The main goal for all modern weapons is modularity. ... [/ quote

    You are right today, BUT - alas, progress is constantly stepping up, and the future of INDIVIDUAL small arms is behind some kind of miraculous scheme.
    For example: I am a shooter infantryman. With me unit slightly larger than modern samples with a strangely thick "casing". On my helmet I have a monocle with a hybrid sight + magnifier + ballistic computer + rangefinder and so on.
    The rifle itself is inside unit in a suspended movable state. The trigger does not pull the trigger mechanically, but only gives the command - "fire" at the object taken into the helmet-mounted sight. And then the fantasy went (today) - the electronics automatically fires a shot only if the barrel is aimed at the desired position, which is what the gyroscopic stabilizer inside does unit, it’s clear the case with ALREADY ACCOUNTED corrections for wind and range for this munition.
    That is, from the moment you press the trigger and until the moment it is released, the SAMA rifle fires when ready. Readiness is the alignment of the line of fire with the line of sight.
    Shooting without misses.

    Such a system appeared on tanks a long time ago. When riding, the gun shakes and the shooter should only take the target into the sight, and the shot will be automatically fired when the gun reaches the desired position.
    1. zavesa01
      zavesa01 9 June 2014 19: 46
      0
      Quote: Svetovod
      the electronics automatically fires a shot only if the barrel is aimed at the desired position, which is what the gyroscopic stabilizer located inside the unit does, it is clear that the ALREADY ACCOUNTED corrections for wind and range for a given ammunition are involved. That is, from the moment you press the trigger and until the moment it is released the SAMA rifle fires when ready. Readiness is the alignment of the line of fire with the line of sight. Shooting without misses.

      This is all of course just wonderful, but as the respected CruorVult has already said, it is more suitable for small units (armies). No economy can pull out the armament of a millionth army with such models. (not to mention the likelihood of weapons mobilized).

      PS And if there is still a friend or foe recognition system !!! Put everything on the chassis and the terminator is ready !!!! smile
      1. Massik
        Massik 9 June 2014 20: 51
        0
        So you have to combine the aiming line with the line of fire and keep the weapon as stable as possible, otherwise you might think that it was waved by a machine gun and waved it off and he shot it at the target.
  10. kplayer
    kplayer 9 June 2014 19: 51
    +1
    Quote: CruorVult
    Those same Americans when the competition for an assault rifle was conducted and the caseless ones tested the r11, but in the end they accepted their ar in the new A4 design.

    There was no competition for adoption, comparative tests of new ammunition from various arms companies were carried out for a possible choice of a promising cartridge in the future, but they did not reveal significant advantages over the standard 5,56x45 SS109 / M855 cartridge, including production, technological and economic ones.
  11. kplayer
    kplayer 9 June 2014 21: 50
    0
    Quote: Alexander.B
    Even the United States is in no hurry to rearm the aforementioned SCARs.

    So after all Special Forces Combat Assault Rifle - Scar.
    1. Alexander.B
      Alexander.B 9 June 2014 23: 47
      0
      So what?
      1. kplayer
        kplayer 10 June 2014 01: 14
        0
        Apparently too thin? then - so nothing.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  12. bunta
    bunta 9 June 2014 23: 37
    0
    Installation of additional sighting devices (DPU) should not deprive the ability to use a regular sight. In the event of a failure of the DPU on this zig, it will be necessary to remove the damaged device, and raise the standard fly and rear sight (if they still remain there).
  13. Alexander.B
    Alexander.B 10 June 2014 12: 33
    0
    Quote: kplayer
    Apparently too thin? then - so nothing.

    I mean, SCAR is a weapon only for "special forces"?
    1. gross kaput
      gross kaput 4 July 2014 00: 15
      0
      Quote: Alexander.B
      I mean, SCAR is a weapon only for "special forces"?

      No, "for a criminal community popularly called a gang" S.
      SCAR was developed on the instructions of the US SOCOM (US Special Operations Command), for them and it is in service.
      PSAll the more correct decoding of the name is SOF (Special Operations Force) Combat Assault Rifle.
  14. gross kaput
    gross kaput 4 July 2014 00: 26
    +1
    Modularity is nothing more than a fashionable trend, if for civilian purposes it is applicable in military weapons it is not needed and even harmful. It’s too lazy to paint long and tedious basics, I think that if you yourself are interested in real pieces of iron and not drawn in a counter-strike, you will understand.