Rosoboronexport is leaving the European arms market

97
Rosoboronexport is leaving the European arms marketAccording to the ITAR-TASSWith reference to a source close to the organization of advertising and exhibition activities of Russian special exporters, Rosoboronexport refuses to participate in European arms exhibitions, switching to exhibitions in the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East, Latin America and Africa.

“In connection with the Western sanctions against Russia, it was decided to reorient Rostekhnologii, Rosoboronexport and enterprises-special exporters to military-technical exhibitions in other regions of the world, where the Russian weapon is in high demand, ”the agency source said.

In particular, the Russian presence at the largest arms exhibition Eurosatory-2014, which will be held from June 16 to 20 in Paris, has been reduced. “This, first of all, concerns the reduction to the minimum of full-scale exhibits of the latest Russian weapons, which were planned to be presented at the Eurosatory-2014 salon,” the agency’s interlocutor noted. Russia will not bring the latest support combat vehicle to Paris tanks BMRT-72 "Terminator-2", which was recently shown in Astana in the framework of the exhibition "Kadeks-2014".

According to the editor-in-chief of the French part of the official exhibition magazine Show Daily, Jacques de Lestapy, he has only one application for advertising from participants from Russia, submitted by the Kalashnikov concern. “This has never happened before,” he noted.

Earlier, Mikhail Pogosyan, President of United Aircraft Building Corporation, OJSC, announced that UAC would not be lucky to get samples of military aircraft at the Farnborough-2014 London Air Show, which will be held from 14 to 20 in July.
  • http://itar-tass.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

97 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +58
    2 June 2014 12: 24
    Well, to hell with it. What should we do in this Europe request
    1. +30
      2 June 2014 12: 40
      Well, to hell with it. What should we do in this Europe
      There is no need to rush through the closed door. If there is no economic feasibility, switching to other, more promising markets was the right decision.
      1. +7
        2 June 2014 13: 06
        That's right, if anyone needs to come to Asia or buy it somewhere.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +7
        2 June 2014 13: 49
        If necessary, we are ready to conduct a tour of the cities of Europe, uprooting fascism, and demonstrating domestic military equipment in action!
        1. +3
          2 June 2014 15: 36
          If we recall the last exhibitions where the European people pushed us into the far corner, then I don't see any reason to burst. Refuse impressions, remove pavilions, do not pay fees and advertising. leave a coffee table with colorful Rosoboronexport magazines with addresses where all this can be viewed.
        2. PAM
          +1
          2 June 2014 21: 09
          with this slogan, first get out of the couch and roll not so far - to the city of Slavyansk and help with the uprooting ... of the blockade.
      4. PAM
        +2
        2 June 2014 15: 23
        it’s not worthwhile to back the closed door (Europe and you never opened it completely so that their goods are not pushed out of the market), you shouldn’t bring equipment there (a real tank and thereby add entertainment), which you still won’t buy. And to compete and exhibit (push and push) in the field of commercial security, hunting and other dual-use products - NECESSARY!
      5. +2
        2 June 2014 15: 56
        First of all, we will arm possible allies, India, for example, or Indonesia.
      6. 0
        2 June 2014 16: 14
        Long overdue!
      7. +1
        2 June 2014 18: 42
        I agree, only sticks are inserted into the wheels ..
    2. PATRIOT 13
      +1
      2 June 2014 12: 49
      IN THIS GEYROPE ..
    3. VAF
      VAF
      +21
      2 June 2014 12: 50
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Well, to hell with it. What should we do in this Europe


      Moreover, we have "successes" in Europe ... never, unfortunately. request
      1. +6
        2 June 2014 12: 52
        Quote: vaf
        Moreover, we have "successes" in Europe ... never, unfortunately.
        What about Greek tenders?
      2. +7
        2 June 2014 14: 02
        Quote: vaf
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Well, to hell with it. What should we do in this Europe


        Moreover, we have "successes" in Europe ... never, unfortunately. request

        Good day, Sergey!

        Sergey, success may not have been, but our side paid them such money for participation))) so there’s double relief)))
        1. +7
          2 June 2014 14: 10
          In Germany, at an exhibition, our plane was driven into a closed area, so no one saw it. What is the point of exhibiting if your products are anyway pushed into the far corner and they try to shut up even his presence.
      3. +2
        2 June 2014 14: 04
        Quote: vaf
        Moreover, we have "successes" in Europe ... never, unfortunately.

        I remember in the early 2000s in Greece (or Cyprus, all the time confused ...) the S-300 division (Antey 2500) was delivered.
        1. +1
          2 June 2014 17: 36
          By the way, Greece is the only country in the NATO bloc that was still armed with Soviet, and now Russian weapons, it wanted to spit on Amers, and others would be like that.
    4. +9
      2 June 2014 12: 55
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      .What shall we do in this Europe

      Why carry samples: This, first of all, concerns the reduction to the minimum of full-scale exhibits of the latest Russian weapons.
      If you do not come to their senses on time, these samples will arrive at them on their own. And not for the exhibition, and the bride will end with a funeral.
      1. 0
        2 June 2014 20: 50
        Our parade against the backdrop of the Arc de Triomphe in Paris would look good, and the aerial part can also be in Farnborough
    5. +5
      2 June 2014 13: 13
      Fewer visitors will be at their exhibition, our pilots will not be - much more boring.
      1. +6
        2 June 2014 13: 16
        Russian weapons do not need advertising ...! Like our Army!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    6. zavesa01
      +3
      2 June 2014 13: 17
      It's time to hammer this window that Petya cut through.
      1. +7
        2 June 2014 13: 26
        Quote: zavesa01
        It's time to hammer this window that Petya cut through.

        insert "europackage" ... "blind" ... wassat
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Sagittarius
        +8
        2 June 2014 13: 40
        Quote: zavesa01
        It's time to hammer this window that Petya cut through

        It’s better not to hammer in, but to turn into an embrasure of a firing point.
    7. +2
      2 June 2014 13: 25
      The article is incorrectly named. It was necessary to write that Rosoboronexport is reducing its participation in European exhibitions. Although why spend money on transporting equipment, there are enough layouts, especially Europe.
    8. +3
      2 June 2014 13: 25
      but it’s right! The markets need real, not mythical!
    9. +2
      2 June 2014 13: 28
      We are switching to a really INTERESTED market ... And it pleases !!!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +9
        2 June 2014 13: 37
        damn, Europe what,
        every 70 years need to be reminded? fool
        yes they went ...
    10. The comment was deleted.
    11. 0
      2 June 2014 14: 40
      What is the point of these exhibitions if arms sales to NATO countries are not conducted. And those potential buyers who bought and entered into contracts at European sites and earlier with defense export will continue to do this, only at other sites. The only thing that bothers is the delivery distance and as a result, the cost of the exhibition will increase, but I think the little things. Good afternoon, to new markets.
    12. +1
      2 June 2014 18: 19
      Europe? -Yes, well, it’s in the wow !!!
  2. +18
    2 June 2014 12: 24
    Good bay, Europe. For what I fought, it ran into something.
    1. +11
      2 June 2014 12: 36
      Quote: mamont5
      Good bay, Europe.

      So, all the same, Russian weapons are not actively sold to Europe. For any, all contracts with countries located far from Europe.
  3. RND
    +24
    2 June 2014 12: 25
    It is high time. Nefig in front of pigs sprinkle beads.
  4. +9
    2 June 2014 12: 25
    Our answer to "Chamberlain" tongue !
  5. Alexey N
    +8
    2 June 2014 12: 26
    Not a great loss. If the native MO order increases. I’m probably not modern, but it’s immoral to trade in what my army doesn’t have.
    1. bif
      +5
      2 June 2014 12: 31
      Quote: Alexey N
      but it’s immoral to trade with what your army doesn’t have.

      I agree, but some export was done just for export ... besides, there is the concept of expediency.
      1. Alexey N
        +5
        2 June 2014 12: 41
        expediency

        The word is Russian, but the essence is Jewish. If the Russian arms dealers, the children did not live in Londany and Miami, but in the border areas, "export" and "expediency" did not loom.
    2. +2
      2 June 2014 12: 54
      Quote: Alexey N
      I’m probably not modern, but it’s immoral to trade in what my army doesn’t have.
      it remains only to find money for everything, and the sale of weapons is a worthy profit ...
      1. Alexey N
        +3
        2 June 2014 13: 00
        Looking to whom and depending on what.
        But it is better to trade consumer goods, and for this they need to be produced. But that is a different topic.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +7
    2 June 2014 12: 26
    It was very necessary. And don’t fig them to study our technology in detail ...
  8. +4
    2 June 2014 12: 26
    Well, really, how much can you endure the attacks of Moseks when you can calmly turn to them ... oh.

    By the way, and they will not cooperate with the recently announced development of drones? interestingly.
    1. 52
      0
      2 June 2014 18: 32
      "Deadmen SU ​​Today, 12:26 pm

      Well, really, how much can you endure the attacks of mosecs when you can calmly face them ... oh turn around. "
      Watch out, Colleague! It’s better not to turn to these, otherwise they’ll get divorced ... sad
  9. +4
    2 June 2014 12: 27
    Gone and thank God! And then nefig these geyropeyskim to admire our latest weapons ...
  10. bif
    +11
    2 June 2014 12: 27
    "In connection with the sanctions of the West against Russia, it was decided to reorient Rostekhnologii, Rosoboronexport and special exporters to military-technical exhibitions in other regions of the world where Russian weapons are in high demand,"

    We would add "And we transfer payment for all contracts to rubles (or gold)" was generally gorgeous.
    1. 0
      2 June 2014 13: 01
      how bloodthirsty you are))
  11. +3
    2 June 2014 12: 27
    They’ll do it right, worse to the West, we won’t lose anything from this, we will only benefit from exhibitions in the Asia-Pacific region.
  12. +6
    2 June 2014 12: 27
    If they still don’t buy anything because of the sanctions, then there’s nothing to linger on.
  13. +8
    2 June 2014 12: 27
    I think this will further "stir up" Europe's interest in the emergence of new from Russia in the field of weapons.
  14. -14
    2 June 2014 12: 29
    I am not a military man and therefore it is interesting to know the opinion of specialists on this topic.
    Russian missiles with a nuclear charge will not fly if Ukraine does not serve them

    This is stated in the plot of TSN.Tizhden.
    One of these launch vehicles is the Voevoda. It is a land-based intercontinental ballistic missile. She is the only one capable of overcoming the US missile defense. 83% of Russian warheads are carried by these launch vehicles. But "Voevoda" is made in Ukraine.
    The carrier itself, the system of warheads for individual guidance, and there are 10 of them in each missile, as well as the control system are Ukrainian. The developer of the Russian nuclear shield is the Dnepropetrovsk design bureau "Pivdenne". And "Voevods" were made at Dnepropetrovsk "Pivdenmash".
    A super-reliable guidance system that can work even in conditions of nuclear explosions and is in service with Russia was created by the Kharkiv Khartron.
    Another missile, which is called Satan in the West, has also been developed in Ukraine. It is launched with a complex mortar launch.
    All these terrible and powerful weapons, which the Kremlin have recently threatened the world, were manufactured in the period of the 70s and 80s and require constant maintenance. Until recently, the "Voevods" were looked after by the specialists of the Pivdenne Design Bureau and the Pivdenmash plant. It is only thanks to this that the rockets, whose shelf life expired decades ago, are still in working order.
    But if Ukrainian experts stop serving them, Russia will lose its entire nuclear arsenal. Missiles will not fly at best.
    1. +11
      2 June 2014 12: 37
      Satan and Voivode are one and the same bully
    2. +3
      2 June 2014 12: 43
      Do not stop. You, they want to live and eat. What life in the near future will soon be - I’m afraid to even imagine.
    3. +16
      2 June 2014 13: 00
      Yes, "Satan" and "Voevoda" are the same missiles.
      But if Ukrainian experts stop serving them, Russia will lose its entire nuclear arsenal. Missiles will not fly at best.

      1. Why would Ukrainian specialists serve them at all? Doesn't our calculations do this? The Ukrainians gave only "technical advice".
      2. Russia will not lose the WHOLE nuclear arsenal, there are still Topol, Sinev, Bulava + a large pile of tactical launchers.
      3. Missiles will fly, in the worst case they will not get a stamp in their passport to extend the warranty.

      In general, "Voevoda" is no longer produced, the missiles remaining on duty and storage are being fired. At the same time, a new heavy ICBM under the Sarmat project is being created. The Ukrainians have deceived themselves once again.
    4. +7
      2 June 2014 13: 01
      This is not entirely true. On this topic, there has already been a speech by one of the senior officials of the Strategic Missile Forces. According to him, we ourselves can service these missiles. This is the same as with the Ukrainian Ruslans and Mriyas. We can serve them, but we do not have an international certificate for this. As for the missiles, I think we will somehow manage without a certificate.
    5. +4
      2 June 2014 13: 05
      Quote: TURKISH
      She is the only one capable of overcoming the US missile defense.

      It is immediately clear what kind of "specialist" he wrote - YARS perfectly overcomes the American missile defense system, great ...
      So before reading the experts, first find out what kind of "specialist" he writes, otherwise the Svidomo will write to you that we say all nuclear weapons are stuffed with candy, and missiles are simple firecrackers)))))
    6. +2
      2 June 2014 13: 39
      I liked the answers quite clearly and correctly stated by users who knew military affairs, but I didn’t understand the minuses, so I would have to discuss the military site with specialists, and ask questions on the TSN website.
      1. +7
        2 June 2014 13: 45
        I’ll enlighten you a little, the cons put mostly for the phrase
        All these terrible and powerful weapons that the Kremlin has recently threatened with peace.

        These missiles, like the American ICBMs, a deterrent, no more. Nobody threatens them. But you are right, their mass start, this is the end of the world that you know - EVERYONE will get it.
        1. +1
          2 June 2014 14: 07
          I’ll enlighten you a little, the cons put mostly for the phrase
          Enlightenment is a plus for you.

          These missiles, like the American ICBMs, a deterrent, no more. Nobody threatens them. But you are right, their mass start, this is the end of the world that you know - EVERYONE will get it.

          So for this I asked a question because I know two heads well, but a safe atom is better!
          1. -1
            2 June 2014 19: 54
            but why did you get the idea that the MBR will not fly? What’s the matter with us, is everything kept by the Strategic Missile Forces in Ukraine? No need to ask stupid questions.
    7. 0
      3 June 2014 11: 21
      This is the same rocket. In addition to it, there are other samples, it is not the main one. If my memory serves me, then only one division of the Strategic Missile Forces is armed with them. And the American missile defense is bullshit. The phrase about "she is the only one able to overcome" does not stand up to criticism.
  15. Khalmamed
    +7
    2 June 2014 12: 29
    ..... swallow the dust and kiss the rails of evil spirits from leaving in HAPPY FUTURE RUSSIA!
    ..... prepare your green candy wrappers Conductor CRISIS is coming.
    ..... even SAMURAI threw you and lowered all payments in rubles and juan even ready to trade with SPOK only not with you ...
  16. +5
    2 June 2014 12: 29
    Well, okay, but then they will be strong, I would say mortally surprised.
  17. +5
    2 June 2014 12: 30
    In Europe, we have nothing to do for a hundred years, there are better directions
  18. +5
    2 June 2014 12: 30
    And rightly so, we will sell and introduce to our friends so that they can beat our "friends" in the west with our weapons ...
  19. +6
    2 June 2014 12: 32
    And, what to do there, the place at the exhibition costs fabulous money, according to the results of previous European exhibitions, the exhaust, although higher, is commensurate with the costs and the purchases are made mainly by the so-called countries of the 3rd world. Everything is logical - go to the East ...
  20. +8
    2 June 2014 12: 32
    Most likely - this is correct. Our market is the Asia-Pacific region. There is money, not sanctions.
    And with the abandonment of Europe, with their NATO standards, we lose almost nothing.
  21. +8
    2 June 2014 12: 33
    That's right. There are no our customers in Europe, and it makes no sense to spend money on their exhibitions. We’ll take you to where you buy. And Europe can guess, see the equipment and without exhibitions ...
  22. Ivan 63
    +5
    2 June 2014 12: 33
    It is logical. And what should we do among the enemies, it is much better and more promising to hold exhibitions in Asia, and let Geyropa hold an exhibition of "red lights".
  23. Eugeniy_369k
    0
    2 June 2014 12: 33
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Well, to hell with it. What should we do in this Europe

    And that is true
    Mikhail Poghosyan said that China ordered from Russia a “package of modern weapons”, which will include Su-35 fighters, S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems, as well as an unnamed type of ship-to-ship missiles. According to Poghosyan, technical negotiations on this issue "are nearing completion."

    Sukhoi Aircraft Corporation will consider the possibility of transferring production from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to China. This was stated by the first deputy chairman of the Khabarovsk Territory Government on economic issues, Alexander Levintal, ITAR-TASS reports.

    We ourselves will be with "Kalash" series XNUMX?
  24. +4
    2 June 2014 12: 38
    There is nothing to see our technologies and ideas. Let them think for themselves.
  25. +2
    2 June 2014 12: 39
    “In connection with the Western sanctions against Russia, it was decided to reorient Rostekhnologii, Rosoboronexport and special exporters to military-technical exhibitions in other regions of the world where Russian weapons are in high demand,” the agency's source said.


    The West will only lose from this:
    firstly, they will not be able to quickly monitor the new military-industrial complex of RUSSIA
    secondly, relations with the military-industrial complex of RUSSIA will have to be established already at the site in other regions
    thirdly in the world, everything is interconnected .... wherever it leaves at the other end it will certainly arrive.
    1. Eugeniy_369k
      +1
      2 June 2014 12: 49
      Quote: The same Lech

      The West will only lose from this:
      firstly, they will not be able to quickly monitor the new military-industrial complex of RUSSIA

      I think they know all the news long before the official show.
      We will scare them with it. fellow
      secondly, relations with the military-industrial complex of RUSSIA will have to be established already at the site in other regions

      They don’t need a connection with our military-industrial complex, the more problems we have, the better they are. For our piece of arms exports, there are enough willing.
      thirdly in the world, everything is interconnected .... wherever it leaves at the other end it will certainly arrive.

      This is the point good .
      And we already know where
      Mikhail Poghosyan said that China ordered from Russia a “package of modern weapons”, which will include Su-35 fighters, S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems, as well as an unnamed type of ship-to-ship missiles. According to Poghosyan, technical negotiations on this issue "are nearing completion."

      Sukhoi Aircraft Corporation will consider the possibility of transferring production from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to China. This was stated by the first deputy chairman of the Khabarovsk Territory Government on economic issues, Alexander Levintal, ITAR-TASS reports.
  26. johnsnz
    +4
    2 June 2014 12: 43
    Here is our sanction to you ... write boiling water on))
  27. +4
    2 June 2014 12: 43
    Many will not decrease. Love must be mutual ... Europe as you do not turn so everywhere ass.
  28. +5
    2 June 2014 12: 44
    Exponential step! And do not try to return! Pick up your paid Mistals and dosvidos! Nothing to expose to potential enemies with weapons!
  29. +1
    2 June 2014 12: 46
    And where will their intelligence now remove the Old?
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. +1
    2 June 2014 12: 50
    As a temporary solution for a period of complication in relations with the West, the solution is not bad. To those. moreover, the situation with the Mistral oil adds to the fire.
  32. StepanovTDSM
    +2
    2 June 2014 12: 53
    It starts with the fact that the exhibition management will not get the money for Eurosatory-2014, then advertising agencies and so on. Until the latest weapons.
  33. +3
    2 June 2014 12: 54
    Step in the right direction. When necessary, they will see everything, not only at exhibitions, but in real use. This, if you're lucky.
  34. +7
    2 June 2014 12: 54
    Well, it's wonderful, less "darlings" will look out and click fotiki. Better under our eyes let them look at the Victory parades. bully
  35. +2
    2 June 2014 12: 57
    In principle, the loss is not great, there are other exhibition venues, including in the territory of priority potential buyers.
  36. +3
    2 June 2014 12: 59
    Better we will declare a boycott for them. Let their image suffer.
  37. Dbnfkmtdbx
    +3
    2 June 2014 13: 01
    Yes, we’ll have Chinese guys buy everything else, they’ll ask, to hell with this geyropa with American friends together, let them hold Eurovision festivals with bearded girls, the Conchita people in Chichen will not understand correctly, they need to be told to shave, otherwise these guys don’t have a sense of humor I heard already the hairdresser is being sent angry tongue
    1. +3
      2 June 2014 13: 05
      Yes, we have Chinese boys all buy more supplements will ask

      If only they did not start their copy machine. And then after all, the Chinese are still thought out.
  38. mab3162
    +1
    2 June 2014 13: 01
    That's right, who is interested in arming our production is not too lazy to go to Brazil
  39. +5
    2 June 2014 13: 02
    The absence of armaments from Russia at exhibitions will sharply reduce the interest of buyers in these exhibitions. Accordingly, the authority of these exhibitions will begin to fade away and, as a result, European producers are threatened with European losses. And to hell with them.
  40. +3
    2 June 2014 13: 03
    It had to be done for a long time!
  41. +2
    2 June 2014 13: 04
    Nevertheless, potential buyers of our defense industry are located in the Asian and Middle Eastern region. A passive and weakly characterized Europe is enough to see the Victory Parade on Red Square.
    1. zavesa01
      +3
      2 June 2014 13: 21
      Now more Latin American countries have been added.
  42. Arh
    0
    2 June 2014 13: 05
    Let Europe travel for our weapons at other exhibitions !!!)))
  43. pink
    0
    2 June 2014 13: 07
    It's time, why should they show our developments?
  44. +1
    2 June 2014 13: 08
    Maybe right. It is necessary to take a break in such a political environment. And to whom it will be very interesting and they themselves will come to our exhibitions.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      2 June 2014 13: 28
      Correctly. And they will buy for rubles.
  45. 0
    2 June 2014 13: 14
    Geyropa can’t sell our weapons: all of them will be at ukrov.
  46. -5
    2 June 2014 13: 16
    90% of comments like “We don’t need it!” ... And before that, it means that we just rode around Farnborough and Le Bourget? For Blaziru's sake? And how much snot was there about "the bastards French / British oppress us, do not allow us to fly at the exhibition!", Or is that all, pretending that this was not? So, the European military and military equipment exhibitions are the most visited in the world where ALL potential buyers flock ...
    P.S .:
    Russia will not bring to Paris the latest BMRT-72 "Terminator 2" tank support combat vehicle

    This handicraft is not interesting to anyone in the world (except Kazakhs), it was already clear after its first performances, but our people, with the persistence of a worthy and better use, rush with it like a "hand-written bag" spending a lot of money on it ... Now, in Paris as if no one will cry ...
    1. -3
      2 June 2014 13: 54
      .
      So it turns out that buyers mostly go to Farnborough and Le Bourget. And even if the tendency to reduce buyers at these exhibitions is favorable for the Russian Federation, it’s still a noticeable 10 years or less. And then the question is how to promote your technology, and so in recent years there are few contracts on aviation.
    2. +2
      2 June 2014 14: 52
      There is a YouTube on Shilka, as Shilka cleans the city blocks in Syria, and the Terminator’s weapons and defense are more powerful, so in vain you drive him ...
      And about the air shows ... already there is and MAKS has established itself well, let them now beg for us, and we will break.
  47. +5
    2 June 2014 13: 17
    The European arms market is mainly NATO and the EU. They didn’t buy anything. Greece does not do the weather, especially since there is a deep oppa in the economy. So they did everything right. It’s a pity that Rogozin slowed down the tone on the GPS issue. We had to turn it off until we were allowed GLONASS in America.
  48. +1
    2 June 2014 13: 18
    As Vinipuh said
    But weapons are a very strange thing ...
    Every thing - or is it or not, -
    That’s the secret of good weapons!) ...
    A good weapon - if it is, then it is not there right away!
    The only store that needs weapons, is the Kalashnikov store))))
  49. +2
    2 June 2014 13: 24
    We will consider this departure as our sanctions to Europe ...
  50. +1
    2 June 2014 13: 26
    Nothing, we will get more weapons to bend this Geyropa. and then suddenly the cartridges run out due to the fact that they sold them. ??? Not ...- until we arm our army to the teeth, they ordered a road to us. I think so.
  51. +4
    2 June 2014 13: 27
    Пора и нам в некоторых случаях хлопать дверью.Без возврата
  52. +2
    2 June 2014 13: 31
    Я думаю, что это просто еще один демонстративный шаг, который должен показать Европе, что у РФ сменились приоритеты во внешней политике. Покупателей мы все равно не потеряем, так как они ездят на все выставки такого плана, а вот платить Европейским устроителям таких выставок перестанем.
  53. +1
    2 June 2014 13: 32
    да Европа, вроде как, и не шибко у нас оружие-то закупала, а вот страны Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона, Ближнего Востока, Латинской Америки и Африки делали это весьма активно...
  54. The comment was deleted.
  55. -1
    2 June 2014 13: 44
    Только на европейских выставках традиционно присутствуют потакатели со всего мира, смысл отдавать рынок баз боя? Те же покупателе с АТР будут в большом количестве присутствовать на Farnborough-2014.
  56. +1
    2 June 2014 13: 46
    Давно пора это сделать люди приходили смотреть большей частью на новинки отечественного ВПК и стоимость и размеры площадок которые арендовала Россия были одними из самых больших.Пусть ездят в Азию.
  57. Serg93
    +1
    2 June 2014 14: 10
    Ну если нет у них потенциальных покупателей смысал тогда везли туда? Правельно делают!!! У нас и так много
    покупателей реальных!!!!!
  58. +1
    2 June 2014 14: 17
    Quote: Nayhas
    90% of comments like “We don’t need it!” ... And before that, it means that we just rode around Farnborough and Le Bourget? For Blaziru's sake? And how much snot was there about "the bastards French / British oppress us, do not allow us to fly at the exhibition!", Or is that all, pretending that this was not? So, the European military and military equipment exhibitions are the most visited in the world where ALL potential buyers flock ...
    P.S .:
    Russia will not bring to Paris the latest BMRT-72 "Terminator 2" tank support combat vehicle

    This handicraft is not interesting to anyone in the world (except Kazakhs), it was already clear after its first performances, but our people, with the persistence of a worthy and better use, rush with it like a "hand-written bag" spending a lot of money on it ... Now, in Paris as if no one will cry ...


    Пусть своими санкциями утираются am Мы тоже плакать не будем!!!
  59. +1
    2 June 2014 14: 30
    Quote: TURKISH
    I am not a military man and therefore it is interesting to know the opinion of specialists on this topic.
    Russian missiles with a nuclear charge will not fly if Ukraine does not serve them

    This is stated in the plot of TSN.Tizhden.
    One of these launch vehicles is the Voevoda. It is a land-based intercontinental ballistic missile. She is the only one capable of overcoming the US missile defense. 83% of Russian warheads are carried by these launch vehicles. But "Voevoda" is made in Ukraine.
    The carrier itself, the system of warheads for individual guidance, and there are 10 of them in each missile, as well as the control system are Ukrainian. The developer of the Russian nuclear shield is the Dnepropetrovsk design bureau "Pivdenne". And "Voevods" were made at Dnepropetrovsk "Pivdenmash".
    A super-reliable guidance system that can work even in conditions of nuclear explosions and is in service with Russia was created by the Kharkiv Khartron.
    Another missile, which is called Satan in the West, has also been developed in Ukraine. It is launched with a complex mortar launch.
    All these terrible and powerful weapons, which the Kremlin have recently threatened the world, were manufactured in the period of the 70s and 80s and require constant maintenance. Until recently, the "Voevods" were looked after by the specialists of the Pivdenne Design Bureau and the Pivdenmash plant. It is only thanks to this that the rockets, whose shelf life expired decades ago, are still in working order.
    But if Ukrainian experts stop serving them, Russia will lose its entire nuclear arsenal. Missiles will not fly at best.


    Меньше цитируйте клоунов! Неужели вы думаете, что технической документации по рс 20 нет в России, глупости. Благодаря либерастам в 90 годы многие технологии были целенаправленно уничтожены руками продажных политиков, которые куплены п е н д о с т а н о м, но к счастью этот процеcc был остановлен, сейчас мы только восстанавливаем утерянныое
    1. +2
      2 June 2014 14: 40
      Хотелось бы добавить,что главный конструктор Днепропетровского КБ "Пивденнэ"уже гражданин России и получил прописку,там же.
      И хочу заметить,что в часы показательных полётов Витязей и Стрижей в "Farnborough" было максимальное число зрителей,а после окончания выставка буквально пустела.Посещаемость и привлекательность подобных мероприятий снизится в разы,а это деньги за рекламу,очень большие деньги,помимо не заключенных контрактов.
  60. +1
    2 June 2014 14: 39
    Видимо, В.В. ЦУ раздал. Ну и правильно.
  61. KAVS
    +4
    2 June 2014 14: 50
    Если бы еще наши туристы переключились на Азиатско-Тихоокеанский регион, а еще и мы - как потребители все больше отдавали предпочтение отечественное продукции и товаром (где это возможно конечно). ВОТ ЭТО БЫЛ БЫ ДОСТОЙНЫЙ ОТВЕТ ШРОПЕ!!!!!!
  62. +1
    2 June 2014 15: 00
    Нам бы в армию побольше таких "Терминаторов".
  63. P-38
    +2
    2 June 2014 15: 33
    Статье ба-а-а-альшой плюс! А что касается нашего многолетнего участия в гейропейских выставках оружия - наверное, сказывались инерция мышления и наличие большого числа евроориентированных и евроинтегрированных в правительстве. ВВП или Шойгу, или оба сразу дали им немножко по уху, с размаха, и у евроинтергированных в головках наступило просветление
  64. +1
    2 June 2014 15: 41
    Quote: zavesa01
    It's time to hammer this window that Petya cut through.

    Полностью поддерживаю! И начать ходить через дверь, чего со времен бесноватого Петра не делали ни разу. Какое это будет облегчение...
  65. 0
    2 June 2014 15: 53
    В европе и так нашу технику никто и не покупал последнее время, просто на европейских выставках народу всегда больше. Допустим в Бананостане решили перевооружится. собирают делегацию МО . куда ее отправляют? конечно на самую крупную выставку. А на вторую поездку, на менее значимаю выставку, у МО Бананостана, денег может и не быть. Вот такие вот выводы.
  66. +1
    2 June 2014 16: 57
    Европейцы не предсказуемы, не ясно как они себя поведут, если США прикажут им, например, арестовать выставочные образцы нашего оружия, чтобы украсть какие-нибудь секреты. Зачем же нервничать? Оружие суеты не терпит. Кстати, почему до сих пор ничего не слышно о возрождении контракта с Ираном на поставку наших зрк С-300? Хороший, дорогой контракт, и у американцев отобьёт желание полетать в свое удовольствие над Персидским заливом.
  67. Bormental
    +1
    2 June 2014 18: 01
    А кому, простите, наххер нужен европейский рынок? Натовские стандарты с нашими ни разу не совпадают, в европе по факту американская армия плюс еврорезервисты. Продавать там некому и нечего.
  68. +1
    2 June 2014 19: 52
    Хитрый ШАГ... ЭТО опускание НИЖЕ ПЛИНТУСА всех ЕВРОПЕЙСКИХ ВЫСТАВОК!
    ПОТОМУ как НА НАШИ ОНИ СИЛЬНО ВАРЕЖКУ ОТКРЫВАЮТ!
    и НАШИХ там ..ЭТО БОЛЬШОЙ ПОДРЫВ СТАТУСА ВЫСТАВОК!
  69. 0
    2 June 2014 22: 05
    Они сами этого захотели. Станем спиной к спине с Китаем и приготовимся к третьему акту.
  70. +5
    2 June 2014 23: 15
    Rosoboronexport is leaving the European arms market
    Вместо этого Европу посетит с гастролями незабываемая и остроумная Пссаки fellow

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"