Women in the armies of foreign countries

31 May 2014

Austria

United Kingdom

Women in the armies of foreign countries

Cuba

Czech Republic

Colombia

USA

Israel

Finland

Chile

Sweden

Bundeswehr

Serbia

Japan

Cyprus

Italy

New Zealand

North Korea

PLAC

Military Reviewin Yandex News

Military Reviewin Yandex Zen

72 comments

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Bongo 31 May 2014 07: 53
+39

39

0
Beauties in uniform and with arms look certainly very impressive, but even so, war is not a women's affair. In the army, women can only be on supporting roles, although there are exceptions ...
1. The comment was deleted.
2. The comment was deleted.
3. xetai9977 31 May 2014 08: 28
  +28
  
  28
  
  0
  Women need to be loved, not shot at.
  1. Patton5 31 May 2014 08: 44
    
    +17
    
    17
    
    0
    
    All the beauties, how to pick I'm gonna get some fresh air
4. fyvaprold 31 May 2014 10: 31
  +26
  
  26
  
  0
  Quote: Bongo
  In the army, women can only be on supporting roles, although there are exceptions ...
  
  You are absolutely right. The Israelis, as a result of their numerous wars, concluded that a man is not able to listen to the screams of a wounded woman indifferently; male soldiers are always (this is not only the Israeli experience) trying to save a wounded woman, which often leads to their death. In a hopeless situation (a fatal wound, the work of a sniper on "rescuers"), a male soldier can be rendered a "favor" by stopping his torment, a woman will always be saved. Anyway, when women participate in a war, the war turns into a massacre, the soldiers who are used to killing women in battle lose the moral framework that distinguishes soldiers from murderers. Therefore, the participation of women in wars is possible either in the deep rear, or as medical personnel, or in the event of a "total war", when there is no longer a choice. Only the participation of children can be worse than women's participation. Correctly said:
  Quote: xetai9977
  Women need to be loved, not shot at.
  
  It is the business of women to give birth, and to reduce the population of Homo Sapiens, the lot of men. IMHO. With respect.
  PS: Although the posters of beauties with weapons look very, very impressive. Two male passions at once. Yes, and a deep meaning can be found - two opposites, those who must give life, hold in their hands the instrument of death, just like fire and ice. .
  1. Pimply 31 May 2014 13: 10
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    Quote: fyvaprold
    You are absolutely right. According to the results of their many wars, the Israelis concluded that a man is not able to listen indifferently to the screams of a wounded woman, male soldiers always (this is not only the Israeli experience) try to save a wounded woman, which often leads to their death.
    
    Forgive me, but I don’t remember something of such research in the IDF
    1. fyvaprold 31 May 2014 14: 11
      
      +2
      
      2
      
      0
      
      I can’t immediately tell you the material where I read it, but something related to the Six Day War. Currently, the ban under the pressure of feminists in the IDF has been lifted (2000). I will find the material, I will give the link. With respect.
      1. Pimply 31 May 2014 15: 14
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        In fact, there was simply banal discrimination, which was abolished by a decision of the High Court of Justice in 1995. There were no studies.
        
        fyvaprold 31 May 2014 21: 27
        
        +2
        
        2
        
        0
        
        Quote: Pimply
        In fact, there was just banal discrimination
        
        Perhaps you are right, the point is discrimination, I did not claim that the IDF didn’t allow women to enter military units because of research, I said that I read about similar conclusions made by the Israelis. With respect.
        PS: After the ban was lifted, they again tried to introduce it (whether they introduced it, I don’t know) in 2003. The pretext for the ban may be different, but the reason I think, even so, is the soldiers’ reluctance to see the death of women.
        http://www.sem40.ru/index.php?newsid=61509
5. Kassandra 31 May 2014 20: 15
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Are there Chinese women who have already caught some kind of cat and are eating it, creatures?
  what a wonderful planet ...
6. Deniska 2 June 2014 10: 29
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Beauties !!!! But somehow the Jews did not impress with the beauty, the Germans and the representative of New Zealand. )))
La-5 31 May 2014 07: 59
+8

8

0
And where is the photo from Russia? Not an order! Our women are the best! :)
1. All1 31 May 2014 09: 04
  +20
  
  20
  
  0
  Quote: La-5
  And where is the photo from Russia? Not an order! Our women are the best! :)
  That's right! The first graduation of female officers is being prepared at the Ryazan Higher Airborne Command School (RVVDKU).
  1. 290980 31 May 2014 12: 23
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    and there is such a))) into the search engine "Russian paratrooper Yulia Kharlamova"
    1. Alex_Popovson 31 May 2014 17: 29
      
      +3
      
      3
      
      0
      
      You know, there is such a Nordica, she lives in the open spaces of Runet. Well, a true patriot should be ashamed to upload her photos
    2. FlyEngine 31 May 2014 18: 43
      
      +4
      
      4
      
      0
      
      Everything would be fine, but she’s only a crazy Nazi.
      1. fyvaprold 31 May 2014 21: 22
        
        +2
        
        2
        
        0
        
        Quote: FlyEngine
        Everything would be fine, but she’s only a crazy Nazi.
        
        She just shows her armpits shaved . Or a taxi catches.
    3. Igool 1 June 2014 03: 26
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      And all of us are more beautiful .....
2. Walking 31 May 2014 09: 11
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Read the name, so that stupid questions are not asked.
  1. La-5 31 May 2014 09: 14
    
    +4
    
    4
    
    0
    
    For some, Russia is a foreign country, for example, for you.
vorchyn_ymka 31 May 2014 08: 14
+4

4

0
they can still serve in the army .. but when there is a real danger, especially related to the need to fight and not just defile on the parade ground ... they cost 0 ... and a lot of problems .. there are certainly individuals who love to kill, but this is usually sniper ... or contactless skirmishes such as long-range artillery or aviation .. and so .. certainly beautiful, but before the first shot or a corpse seen ..
1. Massik 31 May 2014 11: 12
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Well, yes, these speeches, yes in 1995-96. These "women" fired back to the last, who were taken alive with btrams and torn up with grenades.
  the war turns into a massacre, the soldiers who are used to killing women in battle lose the moral framework that distinguishes soldiers from murderers.
  Well, yes, murderers, and you listen to how your yesterday’s comrade screamed with eggs and asked to finish him off, the Chechens didn’t do that ...
  1. fyvaprold 31 May 2014 11: 52
    
    +7
    
    7
    
    0
    
    Quote: Marssik
    Well, yes, murderers, and you listen to how your yesterday’s comrade screamed with eggs and asked to finish him off, the Chechens didn’t do that ...
    
    Actually, in my commentary, I just spoke about the IMPOSSIBILITY of women's participation in combat, and not about their non-participation, but in order. I "dropped" such a delicate moment as the great cruelty of women, men, indeed, do not shoot eggs to each other, but at the same time, in comparison with what the Chechens did, the shot eggs are the height of humanism, however, they did no better with the Chechens afterwards ... As for the "torn apart armored personnel carriers", can I have proofs? Only not from "Purgatory" and Dudayev's statements for the Western press. And finally, how to understand:
    Quote: Marssik
    ... These "women" shot back to the last
    ?
    What "women", those whose photos are shown in the article? Sorry, but I have not heard anything about the participation of Cubans or, say, Italian pilots in Chechnya, as well as the IDF fighters.
    I repeat - in my commentary, I expressed the point of view that women have no place in war, and not that women have never participated in wars. As for the "killers", killing a soldier in a war is an urgent need, without any gender "prejudices", but killing women is generally a vicious practice, however, any murder is an immoral thing. I am writing this comment not to unleash a "holivar", but only to clarify my point of view, which, apparently, was not entirely understood correctly. With respect.
    1. Massik 31 May 2014 12: 38
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      You have almost nothing to do with it, I explained for a higher statement
      they can still serve in the army .. but when there is a real danger, especially related to the need to fight and not just defile on the parade ground ... they cost 0 ... and a lot of problems .. there are certainly individuals who love to kill, but this is usually sniper ... or contactless skirmishes such as long-range artillery or aviation .. and so .. certainly beautiful, but before the first shot or a corpse seen ..
      
      About "torn apart by armored personnel carriers", you can proof
      Proofs ... hmmm did not hear, explain even did not meet such a word? Told 2 colleagues, former riot policemen who served in Grozny during the 1st campaign, both of them are under 40 already, the conversation then turned to what to do if the gun was in sight, as an example that they will definitely not regret you ...
      What "women", those whose photos are shown in the article?
      also applies to the parent.
      1. 290980 31 May 2014 12: 44
        
        +3
        
        3
        
        0
        
        Proofs ... hmmm did not hear, explain even did not meet such a word?
        
        This German word is not abusive prüfen-check.
      2. fyvaprold 31 May 2014 13: 57
        
        +2
        
        2
        
        0
        
        I apologize, apparently I did not understand you ..
        About "proof", proof - English. Proof - proof. so or
        Quote: 290980
        prüfen-check.
        , not strong in German. By proofs, I meant some kind of documentary evidence (photo, video) of the process described. Moreover, the "tearing up by armored personnel carriers" is a "cranberry" that was actively promoted by the Dudayevites in their propaganda, such as a "cruel ryusky occupier", if anyone did something like that in practice, then, to put it mildly, he did not enjoy "respect."
    2. Pimply 31 May 2014 13: 18
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      Quote: fyvaprold
      As for the "killers", killing a soldier in a war is an urgent need, without any gender "prejudices", but killing women is generally a vicious practice, however, any murder is an immoral thing.
      
      Killing in principle is a vicious practice.
    3. psiho117 31 May 2014 16: 35
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Quote: fyvaprold
      As for the "torn apart armored personnel carriers", can I have proofs?
      
      Do you need a video of the execution? so it is to the "Czechs", they loved to take pictures for accountability ... Our people, if they punished someone (for the cause), they did not relish it as an enemy.
      1. fyvaprold 31 May 2014 21: 39
        
        +3
        
        3
        
        0
        
        Quote: psiho117
        Do you have a video of the execution?
        
        You didn't understand me, I don't need a video of the execution. In general, I doubt that such a video, as well as an event, takes place. Just repeating from time to time the propaganda "cranberry", which no one has personally seen very much, in my humble opinion, is correct. With respect.
2. Pimply 31 May 2014 13: 16
  -1
  
  -1
  
  0
  Quote: vorchyn_ymka
  they can still be in the army .. but when there is a real danger, especially related to the need to fight and not just defile on the parade ground ... their price is 0 ...
  
  It's funny, but I had to deal with another. For example, when I was detained, drug smugglers, whom you can’t call lambs in any way. Well, or cars unarmoured on regularly shelled roads, another beauty drove. I encountered artillery. Not capable of anything.
Free wind 31 May 2014 08: 17
+7

7

0
In the morning, such pictures. Sinful thoughts visit a morally not very stable soul. Cool selection.
kagorta 31 May 2014 08: 20
+1

1

0
I would be the first Swede and Cypriot to blow
1. pv1005 31 May 2014 08: 36
  +10
  
  10
  
  0
  Phew. The word vdul should not be used in a decent society. You to another site.
2. Alex_Popovson 31 May 2014 10: 55
  +4
  
  4
  
  0
  And I like the Israelis and the Serbs. And the first Swede, so without comment
3. tlauicol 31 May 2014 10: 57
  +5
  
  5
  
  0
  Yes, the Swede is just beautiful!
old rats 31 May 2014 09: 20
+5

5

0
the funniest photo with japanese.
although there’s no reason to paint the helicopter like that. I scold my son for drawing on the fences, and these, you know, give a bad one.
and also samurai ...
1. fyvaprold 31 May 2014 11: 56
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  Quote: old rats
  and also samurai ...
  
  Actually she is "onna-bugeisya" .
2. Pimply 31 May 2014 13: 19
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  Traditions. Pilots, at least in Western countries, which only emblems do not apply to aircraft. But the Japanese are just super
FunkschNNX 31 May 2014 10: 49
+2

2

0
Some Amazons are even asking for captivity
Nikich 31 May 2014 10: 54
0

0

0
Quote: Фкенщь13
Some Amazons are even asking for captivity

It would be funny if they took our soldiers captive
sv68 31 May 2014 10: 55
+6

6

0
Vine doesn’t have a woman’s face, this phrase should become an axiom for humanity. A woman in uniform, in any case, is a mother and not a killer, they cherished the need to stamp and not carry death.
1. Pimply 31 May 2014 13: 21
  -1
  
  -1
  
  0
  Given the number of civilians dying in wars - a very feminine
vomag 31 May 2014 11: 02
+2

2

0
Yeah, it means a soldier’s sticking up a nightstand with naked women is normal and a helicopter isn’t according to the charter? red ...... and now in the NATO menagerie is the norm ...
Slotxnumx 31 May 2014 11: 06
+3

3

0
The picture is beautiful .... but there is no place for women's groups in battle, it's hard to even imagine.
yurik 31 May 2014 11: 53
+6

6

0
all this is a tribute to fashion and femenism, a woman in the army is only suitable for service in the rear units, of course there is the experience of using them as snipers, but even after special training. and so that the aunts in their makeup were at the forefront, it is full of bullshit and crap, squeak, screech and tears are what will be observed there.
as an abstract example, it is enough to recall how women behave behind the wheel, especially when an emergency occurs on the road: they throw the steering wheel and cover their faces with their hands.
1. Pimply 31 May 2014 13: 23
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  Quote: yurik
  all this is a tribute to fashion and femenism, a woman in the army is only suitable for service in the rear units, of course there is the experience of using them as snipers, but even after special training. and so that the aunts in their makeup were at the forefront, it is full of bullshit and crap, squeak, screech and tears are what will be observed there.
  
  You’re carrying garbage. He went through a reserve one somehow with the girls from Caracal, they regularly dealt with smuggling drugs and weapons, which were by no means white and fluffy.
Arzamas 31 May 2014 11: 58
+1

1

0
Mostly beautiful women, all this is good, but just to upload pictures on the social network, and in conditions God forbid a real war, these ladies will not look so impressive ...
1. krechet-1978 2 June 2014 18: 47
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  Really cute ?!
Zymran 31 May 2014 12: 06
+3

3

0
But this is Kazakhstan
1. Nikita_Pilot 31 May 2014 19: 03
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  Something Slavic face.
  1. Zymran 1 June 2014 12: 11
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    I determined by lips?
290980 31 May 2014 12: 46
0

0

0
what kind of karamultuk in the photo?
1. Chicot 1 31 May 2014 13: 41
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Quote: 290980
  what kind of karamultuk in the photo?
  
  Carl Gustav M45 submachine gun. In service since the end of the 1940s, therefore, the Vidon is archaic. But the machine is still relevant, and it is used not only in Sweden ...
  1. picca2 3 June 2014 22: 35
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    Who is relevant?
Bassoon 31 May 2014 12: 51
+2

2

0
Everything certainly looks good, but it seems to me that all this window dressing in the photo (with the possible exception of Russia, the PLA, the DPRK and Israel) will shatter to smithereens after the first clash. I can of course be mistaken.
1. Pimply 31 May 2014 14: 26
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  How to say. As far as I remember, the British received some highest awards for the war in Afghanistan, ladies from the USA also noted, Norwegians lit up in a military operation in Libya
2. AX 1 June 2014 18: 14
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  Do not doubt!
nnz226 31 May 2014 13: 29
+5

5

0
Such beauties have to be fashion models, and to give birth to beautiful good babies, and not run around with guns! As in the song it is sung: "MEN were considered THINGS chain mail, saddle and spear!" Women, in spite of all feminism and gender equality, should not fight! Although if the enemy was at the doorstep of the house in Russia, everyone stood up in line ... But this is in Russia, where there were always many enemies from all sides, and the people had to survive. But even in a WAR, in critical situations, amidst panic and chaos, the command was always heard: "FIRST SAVE WOMEN AND CHILDREN !!!", and the men - arms in hand and - in action !!! Even with a grenade for a tank, but to save women and children.
1. Pimply 31 May 2014 15: 15
  -2
  
  -2
  
  0
  Quote: nnz226
  Such beauties must be photomodels, and give birth to beautiful, good children, and not run with machines!
  
  Do you think one interferes with the other?
N-FORCER 31 May 2014 14: 17
+6

6

0
Well, at least not bearded from Austria.
Prapor Afonya 31 May 2014 15: 05
0

0

0
Quote: Patton5
All the beauties, how to pick I'm gonna get some fresh air

Yeah, that's just where the Austrian beard !!!
DimYang 31 May 2014 16: 24
+2

2

0
Greetings to all the adequate inhabitants of the planet. A woman in a war is very bad. And take my word that after the first shot at you from her side (miss), you will definitely try to kill her. In my opinion, my enemy is better to die, or the one who shoots at me than I. Yes, and in general, such thoughts in battle, and you will die. Although there are very beautiful women in the photo. I am against them being on the battlefield. To kill beauty, in my opinion, is a terrible crime.
KABAN009 31 May 2014 17: 51
0

0

0
cool, the Cuban military has our combined loops)
Nikita_Pilot 31 May 2014 19: 04
0

0

0
What is so lacking men, that as many women are asking ...
zennon 31 May 2014 21: 38
+1

1

0
I liked the Italian most of all.
1. Silkway0026 2 June 2014 00: 33
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Donatella? Yes, test ... yabvdul ...
stalkerwalker 31 May 2014 22: 47
+4

4

0
And I saw a girl in the form of a Norwegian cadet Kystvakten with such sadness in her eyes when she left that the children's Gestapo Barne Var only came to mind ...
Signaller 1 June 2014 09: 30
0

0

0
A female sniper is common. Due to their structure, women are more restrained and calm. And the natural needs of the body are solved much easier. For men, the usual need "for a little" and that can turn into problem number 1.
1. fyvaprold 1 June 2014 22: 20
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Quote: Signaller
  A female sniper is common. Due to their structure, women are more restrained and calm. And the natural needs of the body are solved much easier. For men, the usual need "for a little" and that can turn into problem number 1.
  
  You forgot to add that women are more "tough on the wound", as well as less sensitive to blood loss, and from the battlefield, in case of injury, it is easier to take them out - these are advantages. Now about the cons. About "natural needs", let me disagree. If you meant the way to "urinate under yourself", then without a diaper this is a sure way to get some kind of inflammatory disease, such as cystitis and all kinds of "diaper rash", especially in winter, in a normal way, a woman, unlike a man, needs to get up, that, you see, it is not good for a sniper, a man, can in a heating pad, without a special "pale", relieve a small need and warm up a little with it in the winter, there is no heat saving, and there are no stains on the snow. In addition, women are less hardy, they can carry less load and at a shorter distance, and the full combat gear of a sniper is somewhat heavier than that of a submachine gunner. Of course, not everything in this calculation is necessary all the time, but the sniper should be able to carry it all if necessary. Therefore, a woman sniper is good where you can get by transport, delivering everything you need, if you need it on foot, but over very rough terrain, then there is much less sense from a woman than from a man, and in proportion to the distance. IMHO. With respect.
Observer2014 1 June 2014 10: 36
+3

3

0
TEN YEARS AGO MY FRIENDS desperation to emigrate to Israel from UKRAINY.IH daughter grew up and went to the army now sergeant, commander of self-propelled gun was left to serve on a contract basis FROM SERVICE AT absolutely love tomboy grew up with the cradle so it is not every woman ARMY approach. AND MY ATTITUDE TO A WOMAN IN THE ARMY DOES NOT TWO EVERY EACH MILITARY SPECIALTY SUITS THEM YES AND A WAR DOES NOT WOMAN'S FACE !!!
From Tver 1 June 2014 12: 09
+5

5

0
Many photos look like for men's magazines.
AX 1 June 2014 18: 12
+2

2

0
A woman in the army, in my understanding, is either a kitchen or a medical unit ... Well, this is not a woman’s business ...
snifer 1 June 2014 19: 28
0

0

0
Oh good girls.
SIT 1 June 2014 20: 06
+4

4

0
Quote: Observer2014
THE WAR IS NOT A WOMAN'S FACE SHOULD BE !!!

This is what a person faces in a war. Injury to the lower jaw. I really would not want it to be the face of one of the girls from the article.
1. Observer2014 1 June 2014 23: 16
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  THAT'S IT!!!
motorized rifle 2 June 2014 01: 14
0

0

0
"... full combat gear of a sniper ..." made me happy, I haven't laughed like that for a long time! Physiology interferes with reasoning sensibly, Indo well, what's the difference, what's in my pants, well, I'm sitting in a trench, I paint my lips, but the whole point is that an individual does not care who and what paints what, an individual knows how to work with a sight, then he and everyone is happy , but does not know how, then lipstick will not help.
romaniron 2 June 2014 16: 27
+2

2

0
It seemed to me that in some places, this is an advertisement of a military uniform or armed forces, with hired models))))
1. koosss 2 June 2014 18: 50
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  it seemed to me as well, some are very pretty ..
picca2 3 June 2014 23: 09
0

0

0
Half are photo models.