The myth of the "Ukrainian people"
The main prerequisite for the current catastrophe in Ukraine is the creation of a myth about the “Ukrainian people”. "Ukrainians" allegedly live on the territory of present-day Ukraine since ancient times and finally separated from the "Eastern Slavs" in the XIV-XVI centuries.
Contrary to historical data that indicate the fact that Russians (Russians, dews, Rusichs, Rusyns) have lived in the territory of modern Ukraine, Belarus and Russia since ancient times, in Russia they still stubbornly cling to this artificial theory. With strange zeal, they support the myth of the “birth of the Ukrainian ethnic group” in the Commonwealth. Although it is obvious that if in the V-XIII centuries. In the territory of modern Ukraine, Russes lived, then the "Ukrainians" can not arise in the next few centuries of the Lithuanian-Polish occupation. During this period, part of the Russians renounced the previous faith, language, but became not "Ukrainians", but Poles.
Historical sources of the 9th-13th centuries they don’t know any “Ukrainians-ukrov”. During the Polish-Lithuanian occupation, the Russian people were not exterminated and still inhabited their indigenous lands. Moreover, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russia was in the initial period more Russian than Lithuanian. Two-thirds of it consisted of Russian lands. Russian was the state language, documents were published on it and legal proceedings were conducted. Only at a later time in the Grand Duchy did Catholicism prevail, and "Lithuania" underwent polonization. We do not observe any “ancient ukrov” in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russian. Russian and Baltic tribes lived there, having a significant admixture of the Slavs of Central Europe, who retreated to the Baltic under the onslaught of the Vatican and German knights. In addition, many Slavs (Wends - Wends) have lived in the Baltic States since ancient times. Unfortunately, the history of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russian in modern Russia is practically unknown and not studied, considering it a stranger. Although it can rightfully be attributed to part of Russian civilization, Russian history. Later, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania underwent Westernization (Westernization), was absorbed by Poland. But most of its land was eventually returned to Russia-Russia.
The seal of Galician-Volyn prince Yury Lvovich (about 1252 (or 1262) - 1308 (or 1316)) has reached our days, it was sometimes called George. The inscription on it reads: "The seal of the sovereign George, the king of Russia." When it was minted money - "Russian coin", "Russian pennies". They were minted before the 1434 year. The sons of Yuri Lvovich —Andrey and Lev Yuryevich — in the charter of 9 of August 1316, call themselves "by the grace of God the princes of all Russian land, Galicia and Vladimiria."
Galician-Volyn prince Yuri II Boleslav (1308 — 1340) in Latin writing (1335) to the master of the German Order Dietrich calls himself “God's grace the born-in-ruler of the whole of Little Russia”. The Polish king Casimir III the Great, having seized the Galicia-Volyn principality, sent Bishop Antony to Constantinople in 1370 on his own behalf and "from all princes and boyars of the Russians." In his letter he proposes to ordain Anthony so that “the law of Russia does not disappear ...”. The Polish ruler calls himself in this message: “the king of Liachia and Little Russia”. No "Ukraine" and "Ukrainian people." The term “Small Russia” itself came from the Byzantine Empire, the so-called Russian lands, which were conquered by Lithuania and Poland.
There were no special changes in this issue either in the XV or in the XVI century. As before, Russians lived in Little Russia. Nobody knew anything about “Ukrainians”. In the second half of the 16th century, Polish Jesuits, drawing up plans for the dissemination of the union among Russians, noted that they would be greatly helped by meetings with “Russian masters” and that it was necessary to take “Russian schools” into their hands and review all “Russian books”.
The fact that a large number of subjects of the Polish king were Russian by faith and Orthodox were by faith, and the Russian state with its capital in Moscow strengthened near the borders of the Commonwealth of the Russian Federation, could not but be disturbed by the Polish elite. The Polish elite could not create a single Slavic empire that could become the leading power in Europe, although there was potential for it. The Polish leadership did not want to take the path of equal treatment of all residents of the Commonwealth. Lyahi took the path of colonization, religious, national and economic oppression of the Russian population. Poland could assimilate the Russian population, but this required time, which the Polish elite no longer had.
The Poles tried to oppose the Russians of Little Russia with the Russians of the rest of Russia. Already at the end of the XVI century, one can find the origins of that ideology, which eventually gave rise to the modern “Ukrainian chimera”, ready to kill brothers, considering themselves “true Slavs”, and Russians from Russia “subhumans”. In Poland, they began to call Russians from Moscow Russia (Great Russia) "Muscovites." The Russians began to divide into two ethnic groups: Russians in the lands of the Commonwealth and "Muscovites, Muscovites" ("Muscovites") in Russia.
The Russians in Rzecz Pospolita were wanted to be turned into a sort of “janissary” - the selected Turkish corps, where Slavic, Circassian, Greek, Albanian children were gathered and brought up by professional killers, completely cut off from their national roots, ready to kill their relatives, compatriots, countrymen by the will of the Sultan. However, not enough time. This project could be fully realized only in the XX century.
In modern Ukraine, we see the finished product of this ideology. Slavic guys, Russ go to kill "terrorists", "separatists", "moskaley", in fact, those Russians who still remember their origin. The West was able to get their hands on new cannon fodder in the eternal war against Russia - “ukrov-Ukrainians”. Moreover, this cannon fodder of good quality is ethnic Russians, many generations of whom were warriors.
If we turn to the Russian, Byzantine and Horde sources of the 14th - 15th centuries, we will see that there are no “Muscovites” in Great Russia. How Russians lived on Russian lands, so they lived. As occupied by Poles and Lithuanians, and vassal in relation to the Horde, Russia was inhabited by Russian people, not "Muscovites" and "Ukrainians." Russian people in different lands attributed themselves to one people. The absence of difference was natural: it was about one people, one country, part of which was temporarily occupied.
To assert that in the XIV - XVI centuries. “Ukrainians” appeared in southwestern Russia, and “Great Russians” appeared in northeastern Russia, erroneously. This indicates a complete disregard for the historical sources of this era and a conscious deception or illiteracy. The dissected superethnos of the Russes then not only preserved the spiritual, cultural and national unity, but also had all the prerequisites for the elimination of foreign domination and the reunification of the people in a single state. It was the XVI century that gives us excellent examples of active resistance to religious and national oppression and the active self-organization of Russians in the occupied territory. The Zaporizhzhya Cossacks, which for some reason were recorded in “Ukrainian proto-state formation,” was an example of Russian self-organization and resistance to Polish and Ottoman-Crimean pressure.
Only active resistance and self-organization allowed the Russian people to join the armed struggle against the Polish invaders and begin the liberation of the Russian lands. The uprising of Bogdan Khmelnitsky was a real Russian national liberation war. It is necessary to reject the lies about the "national liberation struggle of the Ukrainian people under B. Khmelnitsky and the" reunification of the fraternal peoples of Russia and Ukraine. Russians fought against the Polish occupation and Russian (Moscow) regiments came to their aid. Two parts of Russia were reunited, not “Ukraine” and Russia. For six years, heroic fights with Pansky Poland were not mythical "Ukrainians", but Russians. Not “Ukrainians”, but Russians fought for their will, faith, the right to save themselves, not to be Polish “claps”.
This was well known to the participants of historical events themselves. In the summer of 1648, moving to Lviv, hetman Bogdan Khmelnitsky sent a wagon to the residents of the city: “I come to you as the liberator of the Russian people; I come to the capital city of the land of the Chervono-Russian to save you from Lyashsky (Polish) captivity ”. During the Pereyaslav Rada, the hetman noted that our persecutors and enemies want to "eradicate the church of God, so that the name Rusko may not be remembered in our land." About the war with the Russians testified from another camp. The Polish hetman Sapieha noted: “Not a gang of autocrats against us, but the great power of the whole Russia. All the Russian people from the villages, villages, towns and cities, bound by faith and blood with the Cossacks, threaten to uproot the gentry tribe and tear down the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ”.
Thus, it was not a struggle for an “independent Ukraine”, but for the reunification of the divided Russian people, the two parts of united Russia. Yes, the later betrayals of the hetmans (after the death of Bogdan Khmelnitsky) were not connected with the national question, where the “Ukrainians” did not want to obey the “Muscovites”, but the elite ambitions of individuals and small groups. Part of the Cossack officers wanted to maintain greater independence in order to be able to get more profit from the subordinate territory, to maintain their elite status, and therefore led a "flexible policy" in relation to Moscow, Warsaw and Istanbul.
As for the term “Ukraine” (“outskirts”), it was used in sources to denote the most diverse territories, and it has no relation to the later “Ukrainians”. There were many such “Ukrainian borderlands” throughout Russia. It should be noted that Polish sources, especially early ones, also meant “border areas” by “Ukraine”. In particular, the Polish king Stefan Batory wrote in his station wagons: “To elders, elders, emperors, princes, sisters and knights, in Ukraine, Russian, Kiev, Volyn, Podolsk and Bratslav living” or “to everyone in general and individually from our Ukrainian elders ".
Do not be worth to indulge opponents of the unity of the Russian people and the Russian world. The erosion of the term “Russian”, “Rus” with various newly thought-out words like “Ukrainian”, “Maloros”, “Russian” is a concession to our external and internal enemies. It is impossible to concede to external enemies who are striving to split the Russian people, push their parts together, and absorb the debris of the Russian civilization. It is impossible to help the "fifth column" and regional separatists who are ready to literally invent any people on their knees, like "Siberians", "Pomors" and "Ukrainians". These people are ready to do anything to create their own "independent" banana republic and to cut the subordinate population.
It is necessary to clearly understand the fact that the myth of the "fraternal Russian and Ukrainian peoples" is tailored from historical fakes and insolent lies. This myth in the years of the existence of the Ukrainian SSR and the “independent” Ukraine (which has now become a semi-colony of the West) has taken so deep roots that now many people cannot understand what is happening in the “brotherly country”. This myth wanders from book to book, dominates the media, which makes it impossible to understand the essence of what is happening.
The bottom line is that tens of millions of Russians were trapped in a disastrous illusion, a mirage, a deceptive image. They were turned into "Ukrainians", people without a past, which is completely invented and mythologized and without a future. In the present war and blood. In the future, complete slavery, the role of consumables in the war with the rest of the Russian world.
Their fate is truly tragic. The tragedy is aggravated by the fact that they sincerely do not understand what is happening. They are Russians and at the same time “Ukrainians”. They are part of the rut super-ethnos, which, without asking for its consent, was turned into “Ukrainians” in the 20th century. Several generations of people who were born and raised in the USSR were brought up in the spirit of internationalism, in the spirit of "merging all nations into a single community - the Soviet people", they were brought up by "Ukrainians". Although they have not yet lost their Russian language, Russian culture, consciousness of unity with the rest of the Russian world.
They did not cease to be Russian in their anthropology, origin, language, but over the years of the existence of the Ukrainian SSR and "Ukraine" they to varying degrees - some more, others less - have lost their ethnic identity. Even those who do not consider themselves “Ukrainians” have become “Russian-speaking”, “Russian-speaking”. "Ukrainian Chimera" has become a reality. Rusy forgot who they are. And the enemies of the Russian civilization had an excellent opportunity to confront the Rus with the Rus in a fratricidal massacre. The enemy triumphs. You can make minimal efforts and get excellent results at the output. Chaos covers more and more Russian areas.
Those rusam who have kept themselves in this wraith will face a tough battle. They should become the centers of crystallization, the creation of Russian resistance. History repeats itself. Again, Little Russia is occupied. Russ on their land put in the position of strangers, rogue and slaves. The occupation power, which no longer conceals that its masters in the European Union and the USA, is waging a real war of extermination against the Russians. And it already leads by all methods - now not only in the spiritual, ideological, cultural, linguistic, informational, and socio-economic areas, but also at the power level. Against the Rus, the remnants of the army and the Interior Ministry, the security services, various neo-Nazi formations and foreign mercenaries were thrown. On the side of the Kiev gauleiters - Western intelligence agencies and various non-governmental organizations, all the power of the Western media.
War is rapidly gaining momentum. Already used heavy armored vehicles, artillery and aviation. The enemy by all means strive to dismember and swallow Little Russia. Turn it into an anti-Russian bridgehead. Under conditions of occupation, war and terror, the only means of upholding one’s right to survive and preserve one’s identity is national unity and resistance. For Russians who find themselves in such conditions, the rescue program is simple - quick rallying and fighting the occupiers, immediate reunification with the rest of Russia. All this was already the time of Bogdan Khmelnitsky. The demands of reunification by the Russians of Little Russia and the powerful information pressure of the Russians in Russia will force the Kremlin to take another step in the right direction.
Negotiations with the occupiers are meaningless. The West and the occupation administration are awaiting only complete surrender and slavish obedience. Ukraine in the plans of the owners of the West performs the role of an anti-Russian bridgehead, which should transfer chaos to the territory of Russia. In addition, Ukraine is a kind of trap for Russia. In the West, all the internal weaknesses of Russia are well-known: a sore spot of social justice, the presence of a powerful “fifth column”, where the main role is played by the oligarchy, the comprador bourgeoisie, the liberal wing of the “elite” and the near-power swamp, the Islamist and separatist underground. Involving Russia in a serious and protracted external conflict (partisan-type war) can become a fuse for an internal explosion. This is the scenario of the February 1917 revolution of the year. "Ukrainian trap" must be cut with a single blow, not allowing itself to engage in the games of the enemy.
To be continued ...
Information