Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    2 June 2014 09: 32
    Good youthful faces!
    Good luck cadets!
  2. Wolland
    2 June 2014 10: 50
    Last photo of the girl ......
  3. +2
    2 June 2014 13: 19
    Yeah ..., I remember the young years, I wonder, and now the boys are playing war or are they all in "Tanchiki"?
  4. padonok.71
    2 June 2014 13: 58
    Finally - YERMOLOVTSY !!! Shivering Caucasus !!!
  5. +1
    2 June 2014 15: 01
    the son finished 10th grade and they had something like a week's fees at school — they ran, engaged in tactical training, learned to equip the store for Kalash, its incomplete dismantling, and fired (from pneumatics, really). He shot at 5, because at home there was enough pneumatics at all - from a pistol to an airsoft rifle plus training in a dash. I was indignant that they did not give me a complete disassembly / assembly of Kalash - he studied this issue on a computer and was eager to try on a real MMG. :)

    Threat update: even for one day went to paintball to play. Dressed as expected, berets, tactical gloves. Camouflage (there is also his personal one, but it was different from the command) and head protection was issued there.
    1. therapist
      3 June 2014 08: 15
      What’s one? We need a dozen! Let's work in that direction.
  6. +1
    2 June 2014 15: 26
    A month ago, these same photos were already here.
  7. 0
    2 June 2014 21: 46
    The state as a whole and the government in particular are obliged to take care of the patriotic education of the younger generation. Naturally, if you seriously think about your self-preservation. But for this it is extremely important to choose clear and correct guidelines for young people to follow.
    Here is a quote from the speech of the "main Kuban Cossack" - "The revival of the Cossacks in the Kuban is associated with the name of Vyacheslav Grigoryevich, and his whole life is a model of devotion to his work", - the current chief of KKV Nikolay Doluda considers (army colonel in the past, and now Cossack general and deputy head of the regional administration).
    And who was this "Vyacheslav Grigorievich"?
    ... Vyacheslav Grigorievich Naumenko, Cossack of the village of Petrovskaya, is a general of the White Army, who later became ataman of the Kuban Cossack army in exile. The Naumenko family left Russia in February 1920, traveling to Constantinople, and then to Serbia. Vyacheslav Naumenko emigrated with Cossack units from Crimea to the island of Lemnos (Greece) - where he was elected Ataman of the Kuban Cossack army, then moved to Serbia. From 1920-1958 - as a military chieftain in foreign countries, during the second war he became part of the main directorate of the Cossack Troops created by the German command in Berlin... In 1944 Vyacheslav Naumenko left for Germany, but soon went to Northern Italy, where he surrendered to the Americans in Tyrol. After a while he was released to his family in the city of Kempten. In 1949 - arrived by steamer to the USA ... "(c)
    What else can be read very "entertaining" on this topic ... "For some reason our historians present Hitler's accomplice as" an example of dedication to his cause, which serves as an example for his descendants "... education and science of the region (S. Zengin, V. Krylov).
    The department’s response about the traitor says: “At the same time, Ataman Naumenko did not oppose Hitler Germany, as did, for example, General A.I. Denikin. At the same time, an episode of collaboration of V.G. Naumenko with the Wehrmacht was situational, short-term (two months) and not associated with any active actions. Therefore, it is highly unfair to pose V.G. Naumenko is on a par with such generals as Krasnov and Shkuro. ”
    The position of the department can be called at least strange. If Naumenko was a traitor for only two months, then he is no traitor, and can he be admired? How many thousands of Soviet soldiers were killed in this short period? And then, what does the phrase about cooperation with the Wehrmacht “not connected with active actions” mean? Of course, the generals did not go on the attack, perhaps they did not hang themselves and did not shoot the "subhuman." But in this way both Himler and Goebbels can be justified ...
    The chief of staff is not just a Cossack who has gone over to the side of the enemy. After all, it is in the headquarters that plans and effective methods of destroying the enemy are developed. The head of the GUKV, General Naumenko, shed blood hundreds and thousands of times more than each of the traitors who directly participated in the battles ... "(c)
    We look further on, - "... What did this man, this Cossack not experience! But he never lost his presence of mind, no dangers could break his courage and confidence in victory over his enemies. Thanks to him, a real Russian Cossack officer, the Kuban Cossack army survived, survived with dignity, without losing the banner, without losing a soul. Eternal memory to him for this and a deep bow from all the Cossacks! ... "(c)
    That's it. As today's teenagers say - Krasaucheg! An example to follow ... Personally, I do not accept such "examples".

    And yet ... I think it is extremely important - We have already "played out" the issue of deliberately inflating the exclusiveness of certain social groups in relation to the majority of the population in Ukraine. The result is more than impressive.
    1. 0
      2 June 2014 23: 01
      I do not understand, these facts discredit the Cossack movement as a whole? And before this traitor general, did the Cossacks not prove their loyalty to the motherland? And in the Great Patriotic War there were no Cossack units (by the way, entirely Cossack) of our Kuban army? If the thought is developed this way, then General Vlasov is an indelible stain on the USSR Armed Forces (mind you, I don’t think so). And in no Cossack gathering, not in a single Cossack cadet corps (and there are even such in Vladimir) I did not hear or even notice in the subtext any calls for the exclusivity of the Cossacks or their superiority over other Russian citizens.
      1. 0
        3 June 2014 17: 27
        Quote: Granit
        I did not hear or even notice

        -Do you see the gopher?
        -And he is ...

        In order to understand the essence of the ongoing processes, it is enough to delve into the many years of attempts by the "Cossacks" to rename Krasnodar.
  8. 0
    2 June 2014 22: 51
    Wow, where is it? He graduated from the HFRVI RV in the mid 2000s and did not hear about this, although Cossacks and KK were present at all garrison parades, and in 2002 even Cossack gatherings based on our illustrious)) VVUZ. Tactical in them, it seems, in the same place where we had it - under Staromaryevka)))
  9. 0
    2 June 2014 23: 44
    God willing, the boys will get the right education.
  10. therapist
    3 June 2014 08: 17
    Religion is just not that. I need not fabulous, but real, through consciousness. Then there will be sense.
  11. padonok.71
    3 June 2014 18: 17
    Where mentors look! A military greeting with a weapon is not given! What do they teach them there?
  12. 0
    7 June 2014 22: 27
    My daughter is studying there, the mentors there "mummers" was one experienced former military man, he was fired for what he found as a school principal laundering money. I am glad that the discipline is good.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"