Lipetsk Aviation Center received the latest Su-35С fighters

56
According to the information agency "Vesti", 28 in May 2014 of the Year The 4 th Red Banner Center for Combat Use and Retraining of the Air Force of the Russian Air Force named after V.P. Chkalov in Lipetsk received four newest Su-35С multi-purpose fighters that were being developed at the Yu.A. Gagarin in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.



Su-35S delivered to the Russian Air Force as part of the state armament program. These fighters were built in 2012 under the contract of the Russian Ministry of Defense with OAO Sukhoi Company of August 2009, which provides for the supply of 48 fighters of this type. In January, the 2014 of the year, the aircraft went to work to bring them to the "technical face of the 2013 of the year."

According to Lipetsk pilots, who have covered 9 a total of thousands of kilometers, they did not feel any discomfort.

“You take off and immediately feel his craving at full afterburner. Further, on the maneuvers - no questions. At low altitude behaves well. It’s just that the machine was created to fight on it, without looking at the cockpit, only by working with the sight, ”said Vasily Akimovich, deputy head of the Lipetsk aviation center.

According to the pilots, these cars are the last step before the fifth generation aircraft. Su-35 comes to replace the front-line fighter Su-27, which differs primarily in on-board equipment, capable of solving new tactical tasks. In particular, the aircraft can fly at any time of the day and under any meteorological conditions.

“It seems that the plane looks like Su-27. In fact, it is completely different. His control system, weapons - absolutely new. Both principles and functionality are completely different. And the pilot should have a new approach, ”noted Alexander Kharchevsky.

In the Lipetsk Aviation Center an important stage of research begins, the results of which will provide instructions for the further operation of fighters.

  • http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    29 May 2014 12: 05
    With replenishment! Give more, better!
    1. +2
      29 May 2014 12: 49
      Good school for PILOTS !!!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      29 May 2014 12: 53
      It would be nice to supplement the Su-35S in our Air Force and MiG-35! Tandem heavy-light fighters have always paid off wink
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      29 May 2014 13: 25
      Sorry, but you need to say this closer to the top.

      Please correct the content! URGENT!

      These are not modified, but new cars! A man with a defense min said information 100%

      Think about it yourself! Su-35С were currently delivered only to the 2 aerodrome-Dzemgi and Akhtubinsk! They were not in the Lipetsk air center! Well now there are already.)
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +3
        29 May 2014 16: 38
        Quote: Anton Gavrilov

        These are not modified, but new cars! A man with a defense min said information 100%


        Let your man from MO ... have a bite of something. after... drinks
        There were 8 in LII and GLITS, 4 were sent to the factory, 12 were handed over to Dzemgi (4 of them were immediately sent back to the GLITs instead of those who left for revision, because the next 4 ka will be further developed).
        And these 4th ones after KnAZ went to Lipetsk, as originally planned!
        And stop reading and listening to "doneunas"! There will be more benefits drinks
      2. +2
        29 May 2014 16: 50
        Quote: Anton Gavrilov
        ! They weren’t in the Lipetsk air center! Well, now there are already.)

        You take a look at Google maps, there they were lit up last year.
    6. Codename49
      -11
      29 May 2014 14: 46
      ANOTHER 200000 pieces !!!!!!! And on their parade on November 7, as in the good old days, so that the Amerokanoyids pissed boiling water !!!
      1. -3
        29 May 2014 17: 49
        Quote: Codename49
        ANOTHER 200000 pieces !!!!!!! And on their parade on November 7, as in the good old days, so that the Amerokanoyids pissed boiling water !!!

        A lot of honor! They, the Ameracanoids, had, as it turned out, one SU-24))
  2. +10
    29 May 2014 12: 06
    More often such news!
    1. -6
      29 May 2014 12: 09
      Quote: fox21h
      More often such news!

      What good is this news? They put the planes, and then returned them for revision. Do you want this to happen more often?
      1. +4
        29 May 2014 12: 17
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        What good is this news? They put the planes, and then returned them for revision.

        And they have already been returned to the manufacturer ?! Justify! And a reference please.
        1. -1
          29 May 2014 13: 12
          Quote: Marconi41

          And they have already been returned to the manufacturer ?!

          In January 2014, the aircraft went for revision to bring them to the "technical person of 2013"
          Didn’t they read the article?
        2. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          29 May 2014 16: 45
          Quote: Marconi41
          And they have already been returned to the manufacturer ?!


          They have already been returned back to the Air Force, and specifically to the Lipetsk Combat Application Center!
          and it was PLANNED yet hell knows when.
          What reference ???? From "aviation experts" from the media in the face of pretty girls. For whom that is an airplane, that is a machine gun .. everything is the same wassat
          1. +2
            29 May 2014 16: 51
            Quote: vaf
            What reference ????

            Hi Seryoga! Today see Deer Day or Deer-Congratulations wassat
            1. VAF
              VAF
              +4
              29 May 2014 16: 53
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              ! Today see Deer Day or Deer-Congratulations


              Well, yes, Sanya ... like that lol
              1. +3
                29 May 2014 17: 16
                Quote: vaf
                .something like that

                And all, at least specialists and everyone, at least communications in the Ministry of Defense laughing
      2. +1
        29 May 2014 12: 28
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        They put the planes, and then returned them for revision.
        - for revision to bring them to the "technical person of 2013". As I understand it, TK from 2009 to 2012 is a bit out of date, and that’s being finalized! hi
        1. +1
          29 May 2014 13: 12
          Quote: Dazdranagon
          . As I understand it, TK from 2009 to 2012 is a bit out of date, and that’s being finalized!

          This is just your guess.
          1. +2
            29 May 2014 14: 22
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            As I understand it, TK from 2009 to 2012 is a bit out of date, and that’s being finalized!
            This is just your guess.
            - Alexander, I just work in the field of design, and every month we have something new. And for 3 years oh what a big step forward you can take! hi
            1. VAF
              VAF
              0
              29 May 2014 16: 58
              Quote: Dazdranagon
              I just work in the field of design,


              So dear .... you can modify the project and it may become obsolete. and how can the task be outdated ?????
              And a step in what ... in "stuffing" yes ... in engines (but not always) the same ... but TTZ implies a TASK for CREATION ... so they designed and created ... in the process, it is being finalized and brought to light etc. drinks
              1. +1
                29 May 2014 17: 16
                Quote: vaf
                how can it become obsolete
                - Well, maybe he didn’t quite put it right ... For example, in 2009 I wanted the enemy’s detection range of 300 km, and in 2012, 300 was no good, I need 500 ... So I sent it for revision! drinks
                1. VAF
                  VAF
                  0
                  29 May 2014 20: 55
                  Quote: Dazdranagon
                  For example, for 2009, I wanted an enemy detection range of 300 km, and for 2012, 300 is no good, I need 500 ... So I sent it for revision!


                  If such a "Wishlist", then everything is simple .. the power of the PRD increases (within reasonable limits) and all sorts of "gadgets" (such as a bypass channel) for the use of missiles of a different class (example N001V and N001VE and VEP) ... but what about 300 yes for 300 it needs another "masalet". volume, energy and alignment are needed, and this is already another TTZ, because. and TTT (your "Wishlist" of a completely different .... "type-size") drinks
              2. 0
                29 May 2014 19: 44
                Quote: vaf
                and how can the task be outdated ?????

                Yes, in fact, everything can become obsolete, even the task. There, now they invent tomahawks with changing flight tasks after launch ...
                1. VAF
                  VAF
                  0
                  29 May 2014 21: 00
                  Quote: Nick
                  Yes, in fact, everything can become obsolete, even the task.


                  Of course it can, but only with TYPE or Product wink
                  First of all, TTT (tactical-technical requirement) becomes obsolete on the basis of which TTZ is formed.

                  Quote: Nick
                  . There, now they invent tomahawks with changing flight tasks after launch ...


                  This is primarily a change in REQUIREMENTS (in the light of changes in the conditions and capabilities of combat use).
                  We have the same constantly changing software in the SUV, but this does not mean. What is changing the TTZ for the plane? wink + drinks
            2. +2
              29 May 2014 17: 14
              Quote: Dazdranagon
              and we have something new every month

              Oh, even if you do something new every day, this does not mean that avionics will be changed every month. Not really.
        2. VAF
          VAF
          +3
          29 May 2014 16: 42
          Quote: Dazdranagon
          . As I understand it, TK from 2009 to 2012 is a bit out of date, and that’s being finalized!


          TTZ does not become obsolete wink IT is either there or it is NOT .... i.e. matches or ... matches, but not really, or with certain restrictions on the Lists (in short, it's always the case with us).
          No wonder. that the Su-34 is already the 3rd modification? And all the cars of the previous series. Including some experimental ones have already been finalized under the 3rd?
          And now there will be a Su-34M.
          But TTZ..ono ONE !!!
      3. VAF
        VAF
        +1
        29 May 2014 16: 51
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        They put the planes, and then returned them for revision. Do you want this to happen more often?


        Sanya. And without this in any way .. it’s always BEEN. IS and WILL soldier
        Unfortunately, not all revisions "and bulletins can be performed in the conditions of TECh and ARZ (and even more so .. the current ARZ. Although not all).
        So, sending it to the manufacturer ... the most ... plus and the repair went through. If they were flying, be healthy how much.
        But about MUCH ... this is a problem ... it all depends on the capacity of the plant and the capabilities of the Industry ... we have with this .. "no ice" so the planes go out ... in "trial operation" (according to automotive classification. ..without full opshena wassat ), and in the process already ..... "brought to mind and .. compliance with TTZ".
    2. +3
      29 May 2014 12: 44
      Since the summer, the whole movement in the military-industrial complex begins, so there will be a lot of such news.)
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +1
        29 May 2014 17: 01
        Quote: Anton Gavrilov
        Since the summer, the whole movement in the military-industrial complex begins


        Starting this summer, the opposite will start ... problems with dvizhuha .... unfortunately. recourse
  3. +2
    29 May 2014 12: 11
    And is this miracle Poghosyan trying to sell to China?
    1. +1
      29 May 2014 13: 30
      Poghosyan has nothing to do with it. not he decides what to sell and what not.
      1. VAF
        VAF
        0
        29 May 2014 17: 05
        Quote: Wiruz
        Poghosyan has nothing to do with it. not he decides what to sell and what not.


        +! Only you can add ... BONUS issued!
    2. VAF
      VAF
      0
      29 May 2014 17: 03
      Quote: Const
      And is this miracle Poghosyan trying to sell to China?


      Why is he trying? Or do you think. that the gas contract is for "pretty eyes" or that "we are so good"? wassat
  4. Nikolav
    +7
    29 May 2014 12: 14
    Yesterday at work I was just rustling over my head. Beauties!
    1. -1
      29 May 2014 12: 43
      Quote: Nicholas
      Yesterday at work I was just rustling over my head

      and where do you work in Lipetsk?
  5. -1
    29 May 2014 12: 17
    Understood nothing. Previously, all the planes were in Lipetsk, then they found some kind of flaw and on this basis they refused to buy China, the planes themselves were driven to the airbase near Komsomolsk in order to monitor the condition of the machines, now Lipetsk again. I want to know what the "face of 1913" is?
    1. Tolerast
      +8
      29 May 2014 12: 23
      "The Face of 1913" is Sikorsky's biplane "Russian Knight".
  6. +3
    29 May 2014 12: 18
    This is good news ... it is necessary to prepare pilots for conducting modern military operations or to improve their professional level with the most modern technology.
  7. Leshka
    0
    29 May 2014 12: 28
    beautiful bird good
  8. Dbnfkmtdbx
    0
    29 May 2014 12: 29
    Good news, Cheers to Rlossia! good
  9. 0
    29 May 2014 12: 37
    So they need to fight and not admire ..
    1. 0
      29 May 2014 18: 56
      Sometimes it's enough to demonstrate. Then the desire of um ... Ah, "partners", disappears to do nasty things. And this is the best option!
  10. Siberian2183
    0
    29 May 2014 12: 40
    super car that would drive to the new dryer of the Nazis
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    29 May 2014 12: 45
    eh, again Europe will introduce sanctions ..
  13. -1
    29 May 2014 12: 51
    the news is good, it’s a pity that only 48 cars are planned to be purchased, maybe another contract will be signed after the first one is completed?
    1. Tolerast
      0
      29 May 2014 13: 02
      Another contract will be signed soon. It is iron. A total of 140-150 such birds will receive the Air Force. While the T-50 will not work in large quantities.
  14. +3
    29 May 2014 12: 55
    I regret that my time, alas, for these machines is over, and the pride in Russian engineering ideas embodied in masterpieces is bursting, sorry personal ...
  15. Igor78rus
    0
    29 May 2014 12: 58
    It pleases, the ice has broken, I hope everything will only develop at an increasing pace.
  16. Palych9999
    0
    29 May 2014 14: 18
    For 8-10 years already, "the ice is moving", but the "ICEKHOD" - not as not ...
  17. ran nearby
    +1
    29 May 2014 14: 24
    Based on the situation in us in Urkain, soon they will not only have work, they just collapsed. After all, the States will not calm down until the third world
  18. 0
    29 May 2014 16: 50
    According to the pilots, these machines are the last step in front of fifth-generation aircraft.


    For example, it seems to me that the Su-35 did not completely squeeze out the entire resource. It can be further modified. Add radar with AFAR, internal weapon compartments, further reduce EPR by redoing some surfaces of the airframe. Here then the Su-35 will definitely fight on equal terms with representatives of the 5th generation.
    1. 0
      29 May 2014 17: 33
      I ask those who are minus to confront openly. If you think and think differently of my words, then prove and not just stupidly throw minuses.
      1. Tolerast
        +2
        29 May 2014 18: 27
        Yeah, there wouldn’t have been an explanation for us as amateurs. what Pichalka
      2. VAF
        VAF
        +3
        29 May 2014 21: 09
        Quote: supertiger21
        I ask those who are minus to confront openly


        And how can you "resist" this openly: your quote from the previous comment- ". Add radar with AFAR, internal bays of weapons, further reduce the RCS by redoing some surfaces of the airframe."belay

        At the same time lol you call it all a modification and declare that it is a su-35 belay

        It's easier not to "get involved" and not to engage in polemics. Just put a minus hi what would you understand. what you wrote .... wrong! soldier

        But in "the power of what" .... it's not far here and it will "slide" to .... but I would not like wink
        1. Tolerast
          +3
          29 May 2014 21: 26
          Dear Sergey, you do not know, by any chance, will the very first serial Su-35S (which have black numbers) be sent for such improvements? Thanks in advance.
          1. VAF
            VAF
            +1
            29 May 2014 22: 28
            Quote: Tolerast
            , by chance, will they send for such improvements the very first production Su-35S (which have black numbers)


            In fact, there (on the first batch of serial) only board number 01 was BLUE. And not black wink



            And the rest are all .. red drinks








            I already wrote above .. they will also send. The more the first ones were ... half ... not the same bully
        2. 0
          30 May 2014 17: 28
          Quote: vaf
          And how can you "resist" this openly: your quote from the previous comment- ". Add radar with AFAR, internal weapon bays, further reduce the EPR by redoing some surfaces of the airframe" At the same time, with all this you "call" all this modification and declare what is this su-35


          Sergey, maybe you misunderstood me, but something like that was done on the F-15SE Silent Eagle ?! So what is the “inadequacy” of my words? After all, this modernization could have come out of the Su-35. If I put it “inadequately” "then I beg your pardon. hi
    2. +2
      29 May 2014 18: 54
      Quote: supertiger21
      According to the pilots, these machines are the last step in front of fifth-generation aircraft.


      For example, it seems to me that the Su-35 did not completely squeeze out the entire resource. It can be further modified. Add radar with AFAR, internal weapon compartments, further reduce EPR by redoing some surfaces of the airframe. Here then the Su-35 will definitely fight on equal terms with representatives of the 5th generation.

      Equaled minus.
      Then it will become PAK-FA ... or a completely new aircraft, it is expensive and difficult. And to create your own advanced super hornet ... that hornet no one needs what Su is, will not be needed by anyone.
      The Russian Air Force has PAK-FA, why do we need two identical planes? And for export, the SU-35 has been trying to sell to someone since 2009, but no one is interested in other than China ...
      1. 0
        29 May 2014 19: 52
        Quote: iwind
        Equaled minus.

        Yes
        Quote: iwind
        Then it will become PAK-FA ... or a completely new aircraft, it is expensive and difficult.


        I disagree! A vivid example of my words is the same F-15E Silent Eagle. What prevents us (in the future) from adding internal weapon compartments to the Su-35 airframe (which is positive for EPR) or at least installing a radar with an Active HEADLIGHT?! Data qualities are present in the American "Silent Eagle". I'm not saying that the Su-35 is anything worse, but you can carry out a similar upgrade.
        1. +1
          29 May 2014 20: 23
          Quote: supertiger21
          I don’t agree! A striking example of my words is the same F-15E Silent Eagle. What prevents us (in the future) from adding internal weapon compartments to the Su-35 glider (which is positive for EPR)

          F-15E Silent Eagle and Su-35 internal weapon compartments will be good aircraft. But how do you see their future? On the one hand, the Air Force and customers can buy the F-35, and on the other, buy the PAK-FA (FGFA).
          They definitely won’t go to the air forces of their countries, export? Why buy a system for the price of a new one (the series will be small F-15SE and SU-35SM). The same South Korea, with all the bonuses that the Boeing promised, still did not take the F-15E Silent Eagle, and this despite the fact that they have experience in operating the F-15
  19. +3
    29 May 2014 18: 30
    Taki vaf is right, these are cars of early releases after a planned upgrade at the factory. This year's harvest should be in December / January immediately by the squadron.
  20. skifo
    0
    29 May 2014 21: 02
    With the replenishment! Hooray! Hooray! Hooray! I saw them on the MAX- nice technique!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"