US Department of State calls to resolve the crisis in Ukraine by peaceful means

63
According to the "RT in Russian", during the briefing, State Department spokesman Jen Psaki approved the actions of the Kiev authorities in the south-east of the country, as they maintain stability and order in their own country. In addition, in her opinion, the military operation of Kiev is not a solution to the problem in a military way. Also, Psaki recalled that the United States is calling for a solution to the crisis on the territory of Ukraine by peaceful means.

Responding to a question about civilian casualties, Psaki said that so far the US State Department has no concerns about this. She also failed to convincingly confirm the US version of the abduction of OSCE military experts by supporters of federalization.

According to political analyst Martin Siff of The Globalist research center, the United States does not respond to reports of civilian deaths during a special operation by the Ukrainian army due to the fact that Washington was caught off guard.

“If an operation of such magnitude with such losses was carried out by President Yanukovych before he was overthrown in February as a result of a coup d'etat, the United States and the EU, the Western countries would have angrily condemned him,” said Martin Siff.

According to him, because of the actions of the United States, “civil war is spreading in Ukraine; The situation in the country is very serious. ”

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    63 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. BYV
      +15
      29 May 2014
      But I’m wondering, purely hypothetically, how many civilian casualties should there be for the State Department to express its concerns about this?
      Answering a question about civilian casualties, Psaki stated that so far the US State Department has no concerns about this.
      1. Bodrov
        +21
        29 May 2014
        Quote: BYV
        But I’m wondering, purely hypothetically, how many civilian casualties should there be for the State Department to express its concerns about this?

        No matter how much, it matters which side ...
        1. +2
          29 May 2014
          Quote: Bodrov
          No matter how much, it matters which side ...


          Here you are wrong too. It is important from no side, but where is important.
          1. avg
            +1
            29 May 2014
            Psaki also recalled that the United States is calling for a solution to the crisis in Ukraine peacefully.

            Correctly. To begin with, you need to establish a no-fly zone over the Donbass, and make all ukro-banderlogs non-entry.
          2. 0
            30 May 2014
            For them, people as cartridges are consumables, how much and on which side is used up is not important, the main thing is that the goals set are achieved.
      2. +13
        29 May 2014
        Quote: BYV
        But I’m wondering, purely hypothetically, how many civilian casualties should there be for the State Department to express its concerns about this?

        Sometimes one is enough, the question is which side ...
      3. +3
        29 May 2014
        Quote: BYV
        But I’m wondering, purely hypothetically, how many civilian casualties should be for the State Department to express its concerns about this

        The number of victims will not matter, simply because terrorists and Russia will be to blame for these victims.
        1. +6
          29 May 2014
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          The number of victims will not matter, simply because terrorists and Russia will be to blame for these victims.

          Everything will be so, who would doubt it? That's what I think, the situation at Psaki is very complicated!
          You can't tell her the truth (she will be fired without severance pay), and she is also not given to lie and masterly manipulate the facts, so the red-haired clown is annealing for the amusement of the whole world. I even feel sorry for this "cutie"!

          AGAIN ABOUT PSAKI!

          I want to glorify one journalist.
          Everyone has their own way, my friends!
          Meet the "salt" of the American land,
          The meticulous, ironic METE WILL!

          There is a red-haired girl in the State Department!
          Bears this, the LORD himself will not make out !!!
          But it is worth MATTER her question to ask tactfully,
          The whole audience in hysteria over her laughs together!

          What a hall there! Above her, the whole world weeps!
          I noticed even then - friends!
          How lies. so immediately corrects patla,
          I-psaki, remembered the saying about you!

          As old as the world, but who does not know her?
          You remove the psaki hair from your lips!
          It’s clear to everyone, he’s stopping you from lying,
          Raise the cup, we are friends for MATTER LEE !!!

          Another proverb we inherited!
          Department of State Well, the right word is Chapito!
          The circus left, but the psaki remained!
          Funny, red, useless yap!

          Alexander! Good morning! hi
          1. 0
            29 May 2014
            Well well psaki the brain is clearly there)) and escho Klitschko syndrome is clearly visible laughing
            poor poor state goss dep usa they are led by such idiots and downs!
      4. +3
        29 May 2014
        The most terrible secret of Russian gas is revealed!
        1. +4
          29 May 2014
          Quote: Ossetian.
          The most terrible secret of Russian gas is revealed!


          Is that, does Gazprom owe everyone? .....
          1. +7
            29 May 2014
            podpolkovnik
            Is that, does Gazprom owe everything? ....

            Well, yes, we all owe it. In the usa they said that if we do not pay our debts they will turn off our gas to us))) .... but I thought that we had our own gas laughing
            1. +2
              29 May 2014
              Quote: Ossetian.
              podpolkovnik
              Is that, does Gazprom owe everything? ....

              Well, yes, we all owe it. In the usa they said that if we do not pay our debts they will turn off our gas to us))) .... but I thought that we had our own gas laughing

              Listen, however, how have we all been mistaken in this regard for all these years ....
              Finally, the "fairy godmother" opened our eyes ...
              And then they would die fools ......
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +3
            29 May 2014
            Lord didn’t bring if Ukraine cuts off our gas from Europe! laughing Well, stupid!
            1. +4
              29 May 2014
              Quote: siberalt
              Well, stupid!

              There is certainly a standard on the 1 psak. wink
              This could not even blurt out.
              1. +1
                29 May 2014
                Quote: Drednout
                Quote: siberalt
                Well, stupid!

                There is certainly a standard on the 1 psak. wink
                This could not even blurt out.

                Chernomyrdin nervously smokes on the sidelines and turns over in his grave ....
          4. HAM
            +2
            29 May 2014
            Well this is necessary, Gazprom has been “cheating” us for so many years: gas was produced in Europe, transported through Ukraine to Russia, and we fools believed that the opposite was true !!! Finally, they opened our eyes to the insidious Gazprom !!
          5. +2
            29 May 2014
            Quote: podpolkovnik
            Is that, does Gazprom owe everyone? .....

            and it turns out that a woman (Nuland) would be successful in the white house. She should spend time with Russian sailors and learn to swear at them smile
        2. +3
          29 May 2014
          I don’t know ... what is mined in Western Europe and transported to Russia ... this is a new page in economic geography
        3. GDP
          +1
          29 May 2014
          "as everyone knows, gas is transported from Western Europe, through Ukraine to Russia" fool
          Well stupid !!!!!
          What a performance is not a pearl! God, who really controls America if the government has such frank downs? !!!
      5. 0
        29 May 2014
        if it went off scale among banderlog ....
      6. 0
        29 May 2014
        how many civilian casualties should the State Department express its concerns about this?

        Strange! After all, human life is LIFE! And it is useless to calculate the number of victims ... to understand the algorithm of actions of the STATE DEPARTMENT. Even before the first artillery fire, the confrontation should have ended ... but no! The goal justifies the sacrifices! So the Amer has the same goal - to LOWER RUSSIA INTO THE STATE IN WHICH WE WERE DURING ETERNAL DRINKS ... Ie. BELOW THE SKIRTING! Moreover, the victims are not American citizens! So they pushed us against the Ukrainians! And in these conditions, it is necessary not to translate these clashes into a sluggish process ... leading every day to new and new victims ... but TO MAKE A COMMANDER'S DECISION "OR ... - OR! ...". Either help the militias of the pro-Russian neoplasms ... or does not fool people ... not promise that we will not abandon them.
        This is what the soul should be sick about ... and not calculate the necessary number of victims ... necessary for the Americans to change their minds! For them, it makes no difference - how much! Or to discuss - the stupid or very stupid speaker of the State Department! Now it doesn’t matter to us ... and so it is visible ... especially since it is not it that determines the course of politics. And if you think about it, the conclusion suggests itself - she was specially released to the front of the scene, so that her stupidity would distract the media from the real lines of action of the State Department !!
      7. The comment was deleted.
      8. 0
        29 May 2014
        What do you destroy the entire population and then express "concern". Who are we dealing with Psaki.
      9. 0
        29 May 2014
        What do you destroy the entire population and then express "concern". Who are we dealing with Psaki.
        1. +1
          29 May 2014
          Gripped topic, no comment.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      10. 0
        29 May 2014
        Very interesting American papier "Russia and the" color revolutions "
        Russian military view of the world destabilized by the US and the West "
        http://csis.org/publication/russia-and-color-revolution
        and mulberries yesterday Obama's speech and the reaction to it in the United States: "President's speech at the beginning of the ceremony of the US Military Academy
        US Military Academy West Point
        West Point, New York "
        http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/05/28/remarks-president-united-s

        tates-military-academy-commencement-ceremony
        http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=122354
        http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=122351
        http://csis.org/publication/obama-needs-eurasia-strategy
        ..This Obama’s West Speech will be disassembled in parts for a long time ..
      11. 0
        29 May 2014
        There is an opinion that the higher the level of (say, American) politician, the worse it is. But it is difficult to think of any worse than the press secretary of the State Department Psaki. Even American journalists scoff at her. Can't the State Department see this. Or it confirms that there are fools in the State Department. But no one considered another version - the "new" Monica Lewinsky, and then what questions could there be?
        1. 0
          29 May 2014
          You mean that she’d screwed up this post ... It seems to me that the option of a clown distracting the media from the thread of conversation also has a chance of existence.
      12. 0
        29 May 2014
        Quote: BYV
        But I’m wondering, purely hypothetically, how many civilian casualties should there be for the State Department to express its concerns about this?


        The number of victims does not matter. It has only which side of the loss.
      13. 0
        29 May 2014
        First, you need to ask Psaki if she knows who the "civilians" are? Otherwise we can go to her office to figure it out ...
      14. 0
        29 May 2014
        Quote: BYV
        But I’m wondering, purely hypothetically, how many civilian casualties should there be for the State Department to express its concerns about this?

        So it was here in some article about the arrival of the CIA director in Ukraine that he said, they say, up to 10 thousand killed we will support you. Judging by the behavior of the State Department of the empire of good, it seems to be true.
      15. Viktor64
        0
        29 May 2014
        What matters is not quantity, but quality. It is necessary to fill up a couple of Americans, then they will see, but at least a million Ukrainians put, they do not care.
    2. Bodrov
      +5
      29 May 2014
      This psaki, such psaki ....
      1. +5
        29 May 2014
        Quote: Bodrov
        This psaki, such psaki ....
    3. +3
      29 May 2014
      Jen Psaki approved the actions of the Kiev authorities in the south-east of the country, as they maintain stability and order in their own country. Here, the witch is beautiful ...
      1. +5
        29 May 2014
        Quote: parusnik
        Jen Psaki approved the actions of the Kiev authorities in the south-east of the country, as they maintain stability and order in their own country. Here, the witch is beautiful ...
    4. +4
      29 May 2014
      Psaki said ... It's already funny. People feel sorry for the innocent
    5. +2
      29 May 2014
      Answering a question about civilian casualties, Psaki stated that so far the US State Department has no concerns about this.
      Psaki is the standard for measuring stupidity. And from the State Department to expect a different opinion means to be the same Psyaka.
      1. +13
        29 May 2014
        Quote: me by
        [I]
        Psaki standard measuring dullness

        I agree!
    6. zzz
      zzz
      +10
      29 May 2014
      My opinion is to eliminate Kolomoisky. Like Kernes, a sniper is needed. Take him out of the game completely. Well, for some reason, for some reason, I am 90% sure that Ukraine will experience a decline in violence, such as Kharkov, Zaporozhye, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk. He is the boss there. He needs ports and industry. He places all of his in key places. What is Putin waiting for? We can’t send troops, I understand, I agree, we can’t. But at least SOMETHING is physically tangible, and not words that NO ONE HEARS! Yes, Donbass stood up, so help him. After all, there are specialists. During the Second World War, there were even attempts on Hitler. And then the prince came, and no one can do anything with him. Then the question is, maybe it doesn’t want to? Then again the question is, why doesn’t he want? Some questions .....brains boil with indignation when you see the children killed ... by the pilots talking in Russian "I'm going for the second run" .. damn it.
      1. +1
        29 May 2014
        I think there is a tacit agreement on the exclusion of physical destruction by snipers. otherwise, all politicians would shoot each other and special services would not help.
        1. zzz
          zzz
          +1
          29 May 2014
          Quote: Cosmos1987
          I think there is a tacit agreement on the exclusion of physical destruction by snipers. otherwise, all politicians would shoot each other and special services would not help.


          Then you need to wait for the lone wolf, who will personally take revenge on himself.
      2. +1
        29 May 2014
        Quote: zzz
        My opinion is to eliminate Kolomoisky.

        I talked with the Germans, they say (referring to friends from Israel), Kolomoisky has been "banned" from entering Israel. The Jews were very angry with Kolomoisky, and they know how to express their dissatisfaction personally. There are people for this, trained.
        1. zzz
          zzz
          0
          29 May 2014
          Quote: Averias
          Quote: zzz
          My opinion is to eliminate Kolomoisky.

          I talked with the Germans, they say (referring to friends from Israel), Kolomoisky has been "banned" from entering Israel. The Jews were very angry with Kolomoisky, and they know how to express their dissatisfaction personally. There are people for this, trained.


          Good luck!
        2. 0
          29 May 2014
          Quote: Averias
          Jews strongly angered at Kolomoisky

          Survived! Justice at the hands of the Israelites! Well, but, as practice shows, it’s effective!
    7. +2
      29 May 2014
      The contract is signed. Now we have our own EU (Eurasian Union). drinks
    8. +9
      29 May 2014
      Funny creature)
      1. 0
        29 May 2014
        Quote: Ossetian.
        Funny creature)

        But if you put a photo of Samantha Power next to it, then Psaka will appear from the cover of "Playboy"
        1. 0
          29 May 2014
          Quote: Prometey
          Quote: Ossetian.
          Funny creature)

          But if you put a photo of Samantha Power next to it, then Psaka will appear from the cover of "Playboy"

          Do you want to stir up Vika Nuland?
          She likes to be in the company of Russian sailors, to gain skills ...... Russian ... hmm ..... speech. Psaka surrendered her, with giblets!
    9. +2
      29 May 2014
      Dogs like a monkey work out a number in the Circus under the guise of the State Department ...
      They ... the USA ... have invested so much money in the Ukrainian mess ... that now they want to make a profit from every cent invested ... all who are against are terrorists ... they can be destroyed. This is US policy and is not unusual.
    10. +4
      29 May 2014
      It’s not even funny to read her nonsense ... Imagine that she was chosen by competition and she turned out to be the BEST CANDIDATE wassat and now think over who you choose ..... It's just not funny ...
      1. 0
        29 May 2014
        If Psaki "worked" as a traveling press secretary for Senator Barack Obama ... then there is nothing surprising
    11. +8
      29 May 2014
      She should be placed in the ward of weights and measures as a standard of stupidity. And enter the unit of stupidity - "psaka" into the SI system.
    12. 0
      29 May 2014
      OPS news - "One psaki said" (instead of OBS, one woman said)
    13. Dbnfkmtdbx
      0
      29 May 2014
      And I think the Americans themselves are neighing the hunt for the speeches of this lady, because her speeches spilled into quotes, well, jokers fool
    14. Maximus not
      0
      29 May 2014
      Where did they find this TP? All thoughts grow
    15. +2
      29 May 2014
      It turns out interesting. The position of the US State Department is clear and unchanged. But what about the Ukrainian army, or rather, the KTA members? If the United States does not recognize a military operation, then all kinds of lifting, bonus and other Armed Forces of Ukraine are not allowed. So it turns out that the soldiers put their carcasses under the bullets of the "separatists" for this. Even if we assume a "victory over the separatists," there was no war, which means the rehabilitation of the wounded at the expense of the wounded themselves. It turns out that the State Department raises its soldiers for grandmothers.
    16. 0
      29 May 2014
      An interesting way to maintain order and stability is by destroying civilians. Or I just didn’t make a difference
    17. 0
      29 May 2014
      The title of the article is mocking. But, since not everyone reads the content carefully, it’s fraudulent. Minus because of the name.
    18. +1
      29 May 2014
      Quote: zzz
      My opinion is that you need to eliminate Kolomoisky. Like Kernes, you need a sniper. Remove him completely from the game. Well, for some reason, I am 90% sure that violence will decline faster in Ukraine, with Kharkiv, Zaporozhye, Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk below it. He is the boss there; he needs ports and industry. He puts all his people in key places. What is Putin waiting for? We cannot bring in troops, I understand, I agree, we cannot. But at least SOMETHING physically tangible, and not words that NO ONE HEARS! Yes, Donbass has risen, so help him. There are specialists. During the Second World War, even Hitler was assassinated. And then the prince came, and no one can do anything with him. Then the question is, maybe - does not want? Then again the question is, why doesn't he want to? Some questions ..... brains are boiling with indignation when you see children killed ... by pilots talking in Russian "I'm going for the second call" .. damn it.


      Are you sure that Kolomoisky is sitting in Dnepropetrovsk and waiting? He sits in Switzerland in his mountain villa, practically a castle, guarded by numerous guards who speak neither Russian nor Ukrainian .... And in Ukraine everything is run by his right hand, Boris Filatov, "famous" for the phrase "You need to give scum any such promises, guarantees and make any concessions. And hang up ... We will hang them later. "
    19. 0
      29 May 2014
      What am I, redhead? - psaki exclaimed to herself, once again forced to puff out for American politics in front of the whole world. laughing
    20. 0
      29 May 2014
      Psaki, Psaki ..................... Due to its stupidity, it got into history! Probably proud of yourself!
    21. 0
      29 May 2014
      Petrosyan nervously smokes looking at Psaki .... he is far from such talent !!!
      1. 0
        29 May 2014
        Petrosyan - smart and comedian

        And Psaki is stupid (to put it mildly) and her "humor"
        people all over the world pay with their lives.
    22. 0
      29 May 2014
      You know, comrades, in modern psychiatry, and not only in modern, a violation of logical thinking, even at the household level, makes the doctor look with interest at the uh, patient, you can imagine how American psychiatrists are happy to receive such endless material for their research. And where? At the top of your own government! After all, the gap in logic in the US State Department is complete! They approve of the mass killings of Ukrainian citizens, but they say that the conflict should be resolved peacefully. This can not even be called an attempt to save face in a badly bad game. Psaki is simply an unreasonable upstart, by the will of fate falling into the lobby of the US government. It is much more dangerous that they rule and direct the policies of the strongest state in the world. What to hide is. That’s scary. Who can guarantee that one day these lunatics, in a fit of depression, will not give a command to launch rockets by randomly tapping their finger on the map at random? You can mock the stupid representative of the State Department as much as you like (which I myself do with great pleasure), but this does not diminish the danger of unleashing a third of the world.
    23. 0
      29 May 2014
      In the person of Psaki, the entire higher brotherhood of amers is visible, in a word belay request
    24. Gagarin
      0
      29 May 2014
      You listen to these speeches and one conclusion suggests itself:
      THIS IS AN EXTERNAL WORLD.
    25. 0
      29 May 2014
      It seems to me that she began to guess something. In the last shots, after Matt’s question from AP, she answered as usual, but her face was perplexed-irritated. Or did someone tell her that the whole world was laughing at her?
    26. +2
      29 May 2014
      yak garn divchin turned out
      1. 0
        29 May 2014
        Quote: ibragim
        yak garn divchin turned out

        And don’t say ... Krasapet ...
    27. 0
      29 May 2014
      But in a different way it will not work! Oh, how the Americans are furious that you can’t fly to dill and teach all the tolerance and democracy! Yes, guys, they took a stone too tough!
    28. shamilT67
      0
      29 May 2014
      And I thought why it was turned off the gas in the area. Ukraine turned out to be blocked. Maidan them in *** opu.
    29. 0
      29 May 2014
      "... Psaki approved the actions of the Kiev authorities in the south-east of the country, as they maintain stability and order in their own country ..."

      so that in your American land there is such order and such stability, and we - RUSSIA - will not express concern.
    30. 0
      29 May 2014
      Yeah...
      "Terrorists are firing at helicopters that peacefully bomb the city ..."
    31. 0
      29 May 2014
      It seems that they have gathered in power alone ... Is this a degeneration of the state? or the policy of the US oligarchy for a more reliable receipt of bucks and resources?
    32. 0
      29 May 2014
      Pearl from Jen Psaki.
      if Belarus invades the territory of Ukraine, the 6th Pacific Fleet of the USA will immediately be sent there to the borders of Belarus.
      This Momzel amazes everyone with its illiteracy, sometimes there were only speculations that this individual born in 1978 is generally illiterate and so dumb that there is no longer any guesswork and an exact opinion, and it can no longer be argued that all degenerates and demented people gathered in the US State Department .
      Say I'm wrong!
    33. 0
      29 May 2014
      Another manifestation of double standards of Western diplomacy.
    34. +2
      29 May 2014
      What a find for Perky this Psaki. She provided him for 10 years of concerts. She will make him rich. Lucky man.
    35. 0
      29 May 2014
      Quote: mamont5
      The number of victims does not matter. It has only which side of the loss.

      But if we just drove under the guise of commissions to amers or European integrators they pumped pumpkins, then the howl would have risen!
    36. 0
      29 May 2014
      It is interesting in the American administration there are still such clownesses, or are they recruited in the process of casting? They are not all like that, and they must understand that what kind of representatives are such and such power. Look at Lavrov or Churkin - it’s a pleasure to look expensively, but here ... Only squint is wretchedly lacking. America is falling apart.
      1. Viktor64
        0
        29 May 2014
        They have one more, but she’s even dumber, and most importantly, unlike Psaki, she is also an aggressive feminist - the US representative to the UN Security Council. She really doesn’t speak so often, but even diplomats come running to look at her cries regarding Churkin.
    37. +1
      29 May 2014
      There are dumb, there are very dumb and there are psaki.
      1. 0
        29 May 2014
        Quote: Andrey 447
        There are dumb, there are very dumb and there are psaki.

        Well noticed, nothing to add.
    38. 0
      29 May 2014
      They don't care how many victims there will be among the Russians! Geyropa and the Amers carry out the failed plan "OST" in 41-45. Why are we surprised? Small, vile, stupid and cruel Galicia, following the "wise" and naturally "philanthropic" advice of the "enlightened" part of humanity, rapes and tries to destroy the Russian world. Of course they will not succeed, but these scum will bring a lot of harm!
    39. 0
      29 May 2014
      Guys like pretty fools.
      After such a furor, Jen will have no end to the boyfriends.
    40. 0
      29 May 2014
      It seems to me alone that only comrade Lee asks Psake uncomfortable questions?
    41. +1
      29 May 2014
      Quote: “During the briefing, US State Department spokesman Jen Psaki approved the actions of the Kiev authorities in the southeast of the country, as they maintain stability and order in their own country. In addition, in her opinion, the military operation of Kiev is not a military solution to the problem. Psaki also recalled that the United States calls for a peaceful solution to the crisis on the territory of Ukraine.
      What kind of hypocrisy ... As soon as Churkin has enough patience when dealing with these cynics?
    42. Viktor64
      0
      29 May 2014
      Would anyone buy this psaki and her bosses glasses, maybe then they would see. We must deliver weapons to the east, on the quiet, enough of the old, 80s, and most importantly ATGMs, MANPADS, SV and more mines.
    43. 0
      29 May 2014
      Another "piss" from the State Department daddy.dosov

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"