Military Review

NATO confirmed withdrawal of Russian troops from the Ukrainian border

34
According to the information agency "Vesti", referring to the representative of the press service of the North Atlantic Alliance, NATO finally saw the withdrawal of the Russian troops from the Ukrainian border, but "thousands of troops, but tens of thousands there still remain."


“Currently, most of the deployed Russian forces remain in close proximity to the border and remain ready to conduct operations in a short time,” said the NATO press service.

According to the initial data of the alliance, there were about 40 thousand Russian servicemen on the Ukrainian border.

It is worth recalling that on May 19, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered to return to the places of permanent deployment the troops conducting the exercises in the Rostov, Bryansk and Belgorod regions in order to “create additional benevolent conditions around the upcoming presidential elections in Ukraine so that there would be no speculation around this ".

May 25 in the presidential elections in Ukraine, won the "chocolate king", the head of the concern "Roshen" Petro Poroshenko. According to him, the special operation in the south-east of Ukraine, finally, really began.

"We will put an end to this nightmare, here is a real war against our country," he said.

It is worth noting that during the armed clashes, dozens of people have already died. But the Ukrainian security forces are not going to stop. An ultimatum was put forward to the militias: either they will surrender, or they will be destroyed from high-precision weapons.
Photos used:
http://www.vesti.ru/
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 29 May 2014 08: 08
    +2
    Finally believed in the obvious ...
    1. MOISEY
      MOISEY 29 May 2014 08: 15
      +1
      That's because, until NATO confirms in Ukraine they will not believe.
      1. serega.fedotov
        serega.fedotov 29 May 2014 08: 26
        +2
        Quote: MOISEY
        That's because, until NATO confirms in Ukraine they will not believe.

        Have you finally believed it? -Time to get back !!!!!
    2. vinc
      vinc 29 May 2014 08: 44
      0
      In the obvious, but not the probable wink Hee hee hee Well, they began to fly less and that’s it.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. xenod55
      xenod55 29 May 2014 09: 26
      +1
      Apparently they went to the optometrist, since they finally saw the withdrawal of Russian troops from the border with Ukraine. But again, "not all". But NATO is NATO and NATO has one position, no one except NATO has the right, and NATO has the right to everything. According to NATO, Russian troops should be ALL concentrated, at least beyond the Urals, or in Siberia, so that they are not ready for the operation in a short time. Apparently with a little head, NATO is very bad, because VVP and Shoigu are also human and their patience is not unlimited.
  2. Maximusnot
    Maximusnot 29 May 2014 08: 10
    +3
    In every barrel, the gag is fucking NATO.
  3. afire
    afire 29 May 2014 08: 13
    +3
    The withdrawal of troops does not mean absolutely nothing; returning them back is a matter of several hours.
    And the concession was made in order to see if the Kiev authorities would go for an example with their eastern lands, as they themselves promised.
    It is clear to everyone that they will not go and will continue to iron, but for us this is an extra trump card for the future and the argument is that we, for our part, have done everything possible to defuse the situation, but like you guys threw us once again and now you have no faith . Blame yourself ...
    1. ZU-23
      ZU-23 29 May 2014 08: 21
      -1
      Quote: afire
      The withdrawal of troops does not mean absolutely nothing; returning them back is a matter of several hours.

      Well, it is better to withdraw troops, although this is of course our territory, but away from provocations.
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 29 May 2014 08: 42
        0
        Quote: ZU-23
        but away from provocations.

        Where to go beyond the Urals? Maybe you can also put up a poster "welcome to russia"?
        1. ZU-23
          ZU-23 29 May 2014 09: 28
          -1
          Quote: Bayonet
          Where to go beyond the Urals? Maybe you can also put up a poster "welcome to russia"?

          Farther from the border, and the poster "welcome to russia" can be hung by the way, because it means welcome to those who come to us with kindness.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. sapsan14
      sapsan14 29 May 2014 08: 28
      +3
      Good afternoon!
      Request: do not write any garbage! What a few hours ?! Well, be a little more serious! Do not understand - do not write! You are being read by other people who will be overly optimistic because of your words.
      Assignment is ASSIGNMENT and nothing more. No trump cards and arguments. Your words are repeated by everyone who justifies the inaction of our authorities.
      Trump card and arguments: permission of the Council of Federations and hundreds of dead guys (not the worst, by the way).
      1. ZU-23
        ZU-23 29 May 2014 10: 00
        0
        Quote: sapsan14
        Request: do not write any garbage! What a few hours ?! Well, be a little more serious! Do not understand - do not write! You are being read by other people who will be overly optimistic because of your words.

        Good afternoon! Nato entered our room, the fact of the matter is that you don’t need to escalate the bullish cheers of the patriot here, you need to think a little bit about it, and when Nato comes in, it will be sad for all of us and him and Donbass, so if there are any real offers , then roll it on the shelves of Putin.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  4. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 29 May 2014 08: 13
    +5
    Why, that's why they were cut off! Damn, the strength is no longer to read this garbage, people, reassured by the appeal "Russians do not abandon their own" -GIBNUT. The best people
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. sub307
      sub307 29 May 2014 08: 33
      +2
      Are you surprised. VVP Generally, if you pay attention, he regularly prefers to keep silent about this kind of "frr majors". We recall the sad story of the Kursk: he did not interrupt his vacation, he was silent at first "like a fish", after a while he gave out a pearl - "she drowned."
      And I'm afraid that in the near foreseeable future we are simply doomed to read exactly "this crap".
    3. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 May 2014 08: 46
      0
      Do not start! It's time to understand that 90% of the population in Ukraine is against Russia, and with the taciturns - all 99! There is nothing for our Army to do there.
  5. taseka
    taseka 29 May 2014 08: 16
    +4
    Now let NATO withdraw its from Poland, Estonia and Lithuania, as well as aviation and ships, including the Black Sea!
    1. Egoza
      Egoza 29 May 2014 08: 21
      +1
      Quote: taseka
      Now let NATO withdraw its from Poland, Estonia and Lithuania, as well as aviation and ships, including the Black Sea!


      Wait! They will take it! But in general, the junta did not expect such a trick from NATO! Well this is necessary! NATO has recognized that Russia has withdrawn troops. But what about shouting about militants and saboteurs being abandoned by the Russian Federation now?

      But personally it seems to me that this is Poroshenko's answer to his request to help NATO troops! As if - "Russia has withdrawn its troops, so why should we (NATO) introduce?"
  6. Chertkov Oleg
    Chertkov Oleg 29 May 2014 08: 20
    +1
    Nata's things are not as simple as always:
    but "thousands of troops have been withdrawn, but tens of thousands still remain there."
    Type taken away and not taken away, dull, pulled up to the level of psaki.
  7. Roman1970
    Roman1970 29 May 2014 08: 20
    0
    An ultimatum has been put forward to the militia: either they will surrender or they will be destroyed from precision weapons.

    Well, yes, apparently, from a slingshot ...
  8. mackonya
    mackonya 29 May 2014 08: 22
    0
    I don’t understand why Ukraine is so afraid of the Russian ground forces if they need to carry out a quick landing operation and immediately occupy key strategic nodes to the Dnieper.
  9. LOCKS
    LOCKS 29 May 2014 08: 26
    +1
    Their vision is cut out only when their tail is pinched. Perhaps it is time to urgently fix it: http: //warfiles.ru/58580-grazhdane-rossii-obratilis-k-prezidentu-puti
    nu-vv-s-predlozheniem-o-nezamedlitelnom-priznaniya-doneckoy-narodnoy-respubliki-
    i-luganskoy-narodnoy-respubliki-eto-pomozhet-pobedit-fashizm.html
  10. Alexgs
    Alexgs 29 May 2014 08: 28
    0
    or they will be destroyed from precision weapons


    I'm afraid to imagine what they call "high-precision" weapons ...
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 May 2014 08: 50
      +1
      They even have some kind of atomic shooters, from which Tymoshenko was going to bullet to the East!
  11. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 29 May 2014 08: 36
    +6
    And why Russia is not able to deploy its troops anywhere on its territory? To be honest, such a cowardly policy and half measures are beginning to annoy.
  12. Dbnfkmtdbx
    Dbnfkmtdbx 29 May 2014 08: 37
    +1
    And what is it? That's what a tear-off point or a scarecrow is of this type in the evening whether the gopnik picks you up and you know him and you look and I’ll complain and the kirdyk is funny, let’s bang uta natu already angry
  13. Turk
    Turk 29 May 2014 08: 38
    0
    Quote: AlexGS
    or they will be destroyed from precision weapons


    I'm afraid to imagine what they call "high-precision" weapons ...
  14. kondor-espada
    kondor-espada 29 May 2014 08: 43
    +2
    Why don’t we climb, let’s say to Mexico? We won’t bring our pro-government there to power? Why should some NATO dictate to us where to keep our troops at the border or further from it? Why? After all, if Ukraine enters the EU, then nor how it will not correspond to our geopolitical interests. Trumps of course are trump cards, well, it’s impossible to watch the news as civilians are being killed in Ukraine, and some psaki and some yatsenyuki are vilifying our country, threatening with sanctions, courts, etc. QUESTION WHY ? When will all this stop ??? Who will answer this question! Sorry, it's boiling!
  15. Agent 008
    Agent 008 29 May 2014 08: 47
    +3
    Well, the troops were withdrawn, and what has changed? And the fact that it only got worse! Kiev began to really bomb Donetsk! In my opinion it was stupid - to withdraw troops ... And only this pig won - Porosenko!
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 May 2014 09: 26
      +1
      Do you think if it hadn't been taken away, you wouldn't have bombed? They can't wait for us to get there! Then there will be a cry to the whole world for help against the "aggressor" and the introduction of "peacekeepers" from NATO? which, in fact, the United States is seeking. Moreover, it is desirable with military action by the hands of European countries and Russia, in order to weaken both. And Uncle Sam will try to warm his hands on this.
  16. kondor-espada
    kondor-espada 29 May 2014 08: 49
    +2
    Quote: Agent 008
    And only this pig won - Porosenko!

    Damn - how exactly noticed. I'm talking about a pig.
  17. Aleks tv
    Aleks tv 29 May 2014 08: 53
    0
    in NATO, finally, they saw the withdrawal of Russian troops from the Ukrainian border, but "thousands of troops, but tens of thousands there still remain" are withdrawn

    Wake up, Ukraine ... Wake up.
    Show me what you really need.

    It is not appropriate to enter the house of a neighbor who called only "half" ... the Slavs somehow do not drink half a stopper. A "not quite" invited guest ... THIS IS NOT IN RUSSIAN.

    And who said that Russia "threw a machine gun"?
    Heh ...
    Russia did not abandon the machine gun, it CORRECTLY and CAREFULLY DELIVERED ...
    CHANGE OF TACTICS ...
    wink

  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. bomg.77
    bomg.77 29 May 2014 08: 59
    0
    In my opinion it's time to inflate the tanks back)))
  20. Drewlik
    Drewlik 29 May 2014 10: 08
    +1
    In this case, I believe NATO members that we did not withdraw all the troops and completely agree with the leadership of our country on this issue. we must be ready. and those who believe that our troops are not on the border, talk with residents of areas adjacent to Ukraine (Belgorod, Voronezh)
  21. Agent 008
    Agent 008 29 May 2014 11: 51
    +2
    Quote: Bayonet
    Do you think if it hadn't been taken away, you wouldn't have bombed? They can't wait for us to get there! Then there will be a cry to the whole world for help against the "aggressor" and the introduction of "peacekeepers" from NATO? which, in fact, the United States is seeking. Moreover, it is desirable with military action by the hands of European countries and Russia, in order to weaken both. And Uncle Sam will try to warm his hands on this.

    Even if the troops are three meters from the border, who cares? They are on OUR TERRITORY! You can even bring the "Poplar" to the border and send Poroshenko's pig to the residence so that he will put it in his pants! I just want to say: “If the troops are standing where we need it, this does not mean that they will necessarily“ climb. ”And the fervor of Poroshenko's pig will definitely cool down! It is imperative that the troops return to the border and let them stand, let this Poroshenko pig be afraid!
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 29 May 2014 13: 17
      0
      I agree, only your answer is more likely not to me, but "ZU-23". It is he who proposes to withdraw all the troops away, in order to avoid provocations.
  22. Leshka
    Leshka 29 May 2014 12: 32
    0
    finally believed or not faded laughing
  23. razved
    razved 29 May 2014 21: 51
    0
    And no one said that we would leave quickly. We arrive quickly, and leave for a long time.