Russia and Europe: cooperation possible?

Despite the current rampant westernization of Russian society, which did not start in the 1991 year, but much earlier, still in the Soviet Union, there remain many questions about the interaction between the West and Russia-Russia. And perhaps the most important one: where are we going?

One can also recall the Russian empire, but under the influence of the culture of culture there was only the top of society and most of the intelligentsia, the common people kept in themselves the heritage of thousands of years of Russian, Slavic culture. And what did the desire of the elite and intelligentsia to “merge” with the West, to become a kind of eastern England or France ?! To a total catastrophe, collapse, the death of the administrative corps, the intelligentsia, its flight from Russia and subsequent assimilation in the West and the East. Then, in order for a disaster to happen, it took a little more than 300 years of the Romanov rule. How much is required for the death of the project "Petersburg-2"? Currently, the processes are going much faster, an information explosion has occurred. Previously, a person needed to go through an initiation, go through a hierarchy, or read very rare literature in order to gain access to information of global significance. At present, in any bookstore so much information that eyes scatter. A man of common sense can learn a lot of interesting things from her and draw the appropriate conclusions.

Therefore, a lot of time is not required for a new explosion in Russia. Many had previously thought that retirees, veterans and the memory of Stalin would die, plus the constant propaganda of his “bloody deeds”. But Stalin remained very popular among the people, people retain their sanity, they can compare the facts. Also on other issues - for more than two decades they have been promoting tolerance, humanism towards all sorts of perverts, homosexuals, rapists, maniacs. Introducing Western behaviors. But if the authorities dared to hold a referendum among the people, the result would be the same: people would vote to make pedophiles, maniacs executed in public squares, that is, publicly, preferably, and corrupt officials. Common sense is alive in the people.

The project "Petersburg-2" will live no more than a few decades, westernizing Russia, we are introducing all the diseases of the West. Western civilization itself is sick: it is dying out, dissolving into the sea of ​​migrants, unless powerful health measures are taken, European civilization is doomed.

So, 17 May 2011 was held in Athens, the international conference "The military-political dimension of European security", there were discussed security issues in the relationship between Russia and Europe. We talked about arms control, about confidence-building measures. Problems are important in principle, but questions arise:

- What is the purpose of such interaction, what will we come to when “interacting” with NATO?

- Is the policy aimed at the unilateral orientation of the Russian Federation at military cooperation with Western countries not flawed?

- Is there a possibility that all such conferences, summits, etc., are aimed at the disinformation of Russia, at using its potential, to consolidate its dominance on the planet?

- Against whom create a missile defense system in Europe?

What should be written in school textbooks stories and social studies

“Russia-Russia is not a part of Western civilization with its own characteristics, as the various lovers of the West in Russia say. Russian civilization is a different world, another Path of human development, we are a different humanity. Russia is the “heart and Soul” of the planet, it harmonizes and stabilizes the development of mankind. We have different Programs (codes) - they have a benefit, we have a Conscience.

- The West is historically hostile to our civilization, since only it really stands in the way of their “World Order”. Only by controlling Russia, you can control the entire planet. It is time to learn Russian, the world will never be - or we them, or they us ... The "master" of the planet should be one.

It should be understood that the United States currently dominates Western civilization, therefore, it is difficult to talk with European countries about security in Europe. They fit into the framework of the American military strategy.

You can talk and negotiate with individual countries of Europe, with the same Germany, looking for mutually beneficial forms of cooperation. While seeking to reduce the influence in Europe of the Anglo-Saxons, as yet the most powerful group in European civilization. Support pro-Russian movements, parties - in the same Serbia, in other countries.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Max79 31 May 2011 10: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    The article is good. But in order to return all this faith, conscience, honor of the people, it is necessary to actively promote it. To plunge into history the young people who are mired in drunkenness and drugs.
    Our country is not doing anything so that we are not dependent on Western thoughts. Beer advertising, porn, Western action films and much more.
    No sports aspirations, unemployment. What can you guys talk about? wassat
  2. mitrich
    mitrich 31 May 2011 11: 27 New
    • -2
    • 0
    With all due respect to A. Samsonov and his views, I personally consider Russia closer to Europe than to Asia. To focus on the idea of ​​Slavic exclusivity and the personality of Perun seems to me wrong. Peter the Great understood this. And then we will be like the North Korean "Jucheists" with their dubious achievements.
    In Europe (the West), not everyone hates or simply does not like Russia. I would even say that there are a clear minority, about 10-15% out of 100. The rest of the Europeans are quite friendly and respectful towards us. Even in countries whose leadership professes anti-Russian politics, the local population, in contrast to the late 80s and early 90s of the last century, immediately “turns on” the Russian language when they hear the former “occupiers” (Riga, November 2009).
    We need to continue rapprochement with Germany, France, Italy, the Scandinavian countries, there is nothing wrong with that. By the way, Europe itself is already tired of the Pindos and their dictates (Poland and Romania do not count, these still believe in the USA).
    And further. The first figure who tried to drag the USSR-Russia into NATO was ... N.S. Khrushchev. Only when he was politely, but firmly refused, did the “cornman” go on to create an ATS (Warsaw Treaty Organization).
    In general, I vote for Europe, but without buggers and lesbians.
  3. datur 31 May 2011 11: 52 New
    • -1
    • 0
    We need to continue rapprochement with Germany, France, Italy, the Scandinavian countries, there is nothing wrong with that. By the way, Europe itself is already tired of the Pindos and their dictatorship (Poland and Romania do not count, these still believe in the USA). In general, I vote for Europe, but without pederasts and lesbians .-------- ----mitrich,
  4. Мишель
    Мишель 31 May 2011 12: 42 New
    • -1
    • 0
    Western civilization in its form is flawed and also dying out. But I agree that rapprochement is necessary, primarily with Germany.
  5. solovei
    solovei 31 May 2011 17: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    And why is it necessary to get closer to Germany ??
  6. Skills 31 May 2011 17: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    The strategic union of Russia and Germany makes possible the stable and progressive development of mankind, the movement towards the Stars. That is why they are always trying to pit ...
  7. clean
    clean 31 May 2011 19: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    Europe will sooner or later have the question of who to give its preference to in friendship, on the one hand, America is an old and good ally, but for some reason, Europe has carried out the union of states into the EU framework to somehow level the voices between the USA and Western European countries, for the USA and England had a huge influence in this region and already tired of the whole order. England, reluctantly, joined the EU, but it did not accept the single currency of the European Union.
    The EU is now trying to live independently, but still cannot make its own decisions without consultation from Washington.
    And pride is played by hunting and by themselves playing in the almighty. Of course, the former socialist countries have more ambitions. camps.
    On the other hand, a former potential enemy with today's liberal face (I mean the current President of the Russian Federation) who has good feed of minerals. All the EU understands that it will not work to take away feed, which means it is possible to treat Russia more liberally, since the EU still doesn’t shine from America’s old friend, they themselves are looking from Europe to snatch.
    And on the third hand, China, with its powerful economic potential, also wants to steer the world.
    The multipolar world, no one wants to consider, and the United States does not want to share imperial ambitions with everyone. So sooner or later, as part of the US opposition, the unification of the world's leading poles is inevitable because no one is yet in a position to confront the United States. In many forums, the issue of rapprochement between Russia and China was considered as a counterweight to the US and the EU, but China is now so starred from its economic victories that it does not need the help of others, and China is not the best friend for Russia. I agree with our interlocutors that rapprochement between Russia and Europe is the best option for Russia and for the continued existence and further development of the country. And as for their bad habits, I think we will leave them to the Europeans.
  8. Sirius
    Sirius 31 May 2011 19: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    Russia and Europe - is cooperation possible? Perhaps even necessary!
    No matter how flawed and dying Western civilization may be, Europe is still preferable for us Russians. By the way, in the 70-80s, capitalism was also confidently called decaying. For Europe, Russia is preferable. Against the backdrop of the Arab events, the Great Arab Caliphate - 2 is being imagined. And for Europeans, looking askance at their Muslim fellow citizens, it’s a bell, they themselves set a precedent in Kosovo. All of Europe can become such a Kosovo! This is beneficial to the Anglo-Saxons, but the French, Italians, Germans do not. I am sure that Europe in the geopolitical struggle between North America, the radical Islamist South, multibillion Asia, Black Africa will choose Russia as its allies. Such a despised, sometimes hated, demonized, incomprehensible. But in Russia there is something that other civilizations do not have: it is the ability to accept peoples as they are, to come to their aid by sacrificing their own sons. When they press, they will remember that it was Russia that saved the Georgians, Armenians, Bulgarians, and Serbs from the Ottoman scimitar. But these nations were threatened with real physical destruction! Europe could not independently cope with possible problems without Russia, just as England could not defeat Hitler Germany on its own.