Military Review

Iran is preparing to destroy US Navy ships

114
According to the almanac "War Craft", on Twitter for the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution, a scheme of the alleged actions to destroy the American ships appeared.


Iran is preparing to destroy US Navy ships


The plan is extremely simple:

1. An American ship is suddenly attacked by Iranian boats disguised as fishing boats.

2. While Americans are distracted by boats, Iranian submarines are attacking the ship.

3. They are supported by the upgraded Tomcat F-14 Iranian aviation.

4. The ship is attacked by anti-ship missiles "Hormuz-1" and "Hormuz-2".

5. In addition, mines are pre-installed in the waters.

The Americans were a little bewildered by this insidious propaganda plan. If such a scheme works against a single ship, it will still be useless against a group. And the US Navy warship is unlikely to let "fishing" boats to itself.
Photos used:
http://navoine.ru/
114 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Rubmolot
    Rubmolot 26 May 2014 12: 34
    +14
    Thank you for the good news! good
    1. MOISEY
      MOISEY 26 May 2014 12: 38
      +60
      The funniest thing is if a real precedent for such an attack occurs, and even funnier if it ends successfully. Then US military analysts can be fired.
      1. Rubmolot
        Rubmolot 26 May 2014 12: 41
        +75
        “Everyone knows that this is impossible. But here comes an ignoramus who does not know this - it is he who makes a discovery. ”

        Albert Einstein
        1. serega.fedotov
          serega.fedotov 26 May 2014 12: 49
          +15
          Quote: Rubmolot
          “Everyone knows that this is impossible. But here comes an ignoramus who does not know this - it is he who makes a discovery. ”

          The United States forgot their destroyer — which damaged ONE boat!
          1. GDP
            GDP 26 May 2014 13: 39
            +13
            Iranians need to buy coastal defense systems from Russia - the Bastion.
            This is a real check and checkmate for the entire US fleet in the Persian Gulf ...
            And the attack with small missile boats with antediluvian missiles of small radius action is a thing of the past ...
            Hormuz missiles 1-2, also the situation will not change much, the radius of action and combat power is insufficient, maybe only to cover the coast from the landing ...
            1. EvgenSuslov
              EvgenSuslov 26 May 2014 14: 53
              +11
              An arms embargo has been introduced against Iran, which we supported. Although in the light of recent events, I would have blown out the earlier agreement ...
              1. clidon
                clidon 26 May 2014 20: 38
                +1
                We are afraid that later these missiles would not appear in the Caspian.
          2. yushch
            yushch 26 May 2014 14: 13
            +2
            They just didn’t forget, therefore they are surprised by such directness. As much as I did not like the USA, they usually do not attack the same rake.
          3. EvgenSuslov
            EvgenSuslov 26 May 2014 14: 51
            +2
            And about "Donald Cook", who scared only one plane !!! Technology does not stand still, even in Iran there are new developments. So the plan is perhaps just propaganda, but such things are not born from scratch ...
        2. Akvadra
          Akvadra 26 May 2014 12: 57
          +29
          The ark was built by an amateur. Titanic professional. (I do not remember who said). God help you!
          1. i_vam_ne_hvoratj
            i_vam_ne_hvoratj 26 May 2014 14: 00
            0
            Taking off my hat!!!!!!! It was not possible to contemplate more concisely and convincingly ... Remember, please ...
        3. 1812 1945
          1812 1945 26 May 2014 13: 12
          +4
          Quote: Rubmolot
          “Everyone knows that this is impossible. But here comes an ignoramus who does not know this - it is he who makes a discovery. ”

          Albert Einstein

          I don’t know, I don’t know ... So far I have read to the end the entire list of tricks of naval battle tactics - it became scary. I do not think that the Pindo .. Soviet fleet commanders will have a less discouraging reaction. At least from surprise and perish.
        4. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 26 May 2014 14: 41
          +9
          Quote: Rubmolot
          “Everyone knows that this is impossible

          The Swedes thought the same way back in 1703, anchored on two scapaves (single-masted ships) at the mouth of the Neva, when they were attacked in calm weather by Russian galleys with a landing party on board. Swedish ships were boarded and lowered the flag. This was the first victory of the future Baltic Fleet. Peter ordered on the occasion of the victory to cast a medal on the obverse of which the words: "THE UNEXPECTED - HAPPENS" were embossed.
          So USeram should learn history, and suddenly ...
      2. Rostovchanin
        Rostovchanin 26 May 2014 12: 49
        +2
        The funniest thing is if a real precedent for such an attack occurs, and even funnier if it ends successfully. Then US military analysts can be fired.

        But what about the tanker war ... precedents were 1984-1987.
      3. persei
        persei 26 May 2014 12: 55
        0
        no need to build illusions ... fairy tales are over .. and the Americans are now not the same ... any attack will provoke them into a full-scale intervention and crush the Iranians
        1. DPN
          DPN 26 May 2014 13: 07
          +16
          The Americans can crush only those WHO ARE AFRAID OF THEM !!, Anyone else can give them a dent in the teeth, would be a desire.
        2. ssergn
          ssergn 27 May 2014 07: 32
          0
          For full intervention, Congress needs support. This is the time. Unrest will begin in society, because for the intervention, grandmothers are needed, and the situation in healthcare is not ice. These are two. And Obama will be against intervention, the maximum dare to iron tomahawks. These are three.
      4. REDBLUE
        REDBLUE 26 May 2014 13: 02
        +8
        After such an attack, half the US Navy will submit a resignation report. This has already been proved by the passage on the ship of our aircraft. Where the sailors had a panic. And then they don’t tolerate it at all
      5. Tiamat2702
        Tiamat2702 26 May 2014 13: 09
        +11
        Already happened:
        “One Arleigh Burke-class destroyer URO Cole on October 12, 2000 in the port of Aden, Yemen, was damaged by an improvised explosive device planted on a small boat operated by suicide bombers. underwent a $ 250 million refurbishment and returned to service on April 19, 2002. "
        http://armyman.info/flot/em/14954-eskadrennye-minonoscy-tipa-arli-berk.html
        1. clidon
          clidon 26 May 2014 20: 40
          0
          Then in the port of a friendly state all the same. Since then, by the way, the Yankees have built sentries with heavy machine guns, even when allied Arab states were standing in the port.
        2. massad1
          massad1 26 May 2014 23: 17
          0
          250 toons repair? apparently they patted him hard. Yes, for such grandmas we can build a new one wassat
      6. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 26 May 2014 13: 27
        0
        Quote: MOISEY
        The funniest thing is if a real precedent for such an attack occurs, and even funnier if it ends successfully. Then US military analysts can be fired.


        They will do it after all. These guys will not joke. They are deeply religious guys - to become a martyr for them, as for a KGB officer with Mauser Felix Edmundych, to shoot.
      7. Blondy
        Blondy 26 May 2014 13: 28
        +5
        Guys, think about it, who publishes real plans for such operations?
      8. sokrat7
        sokrat7 26 May 2014 15: 25
        0
        Given the current US staffing potential, the example of D. Psaki can allow a similar scenario.
      9. karal
        karal 26 May 2014 15: 47
        0
        I will imagine how the Yankees will write to their loved ones that the Iranian troops demoralized and scared the sailors wassat laughing
      10. Alexstalker
        Alexstalker 26 May 2014 16: 55
        0
        But the mericoses were already attacked-rammed by small USSR boats in the Black Sea. And the plane flew recently.
        1. clidon
          clidon 26 May 2014 20: 43
          0
          So in peacetime, at least do something, you want to fly-fly, swim-swim-swim. What can they do to you? Only if there is an aircraft carrier, can they raise the duty group that will accompany.
          1. ssergn
            ssergn 27 May 2014 07: 34
            0
            "So it is in peacetime"

            Now what? What is the US at war with Iran?
            1. clidon
              clidon 28 May 2014 05: 30
              0
              But is Iran already about to attack American ships? Moreover, in those waters the ear is always kept sharp.
        2. massad1
          massad1 26 May 2014 23: 19
          +1
          yeah, it was - winch from the stern is still looking laughing
      11. Alexstalker
        Alexstalker 26 May 2014 16: 55
        0
        But the mericoses were already attacked-rammed by small USSR boats in the Black Sea. And the plane flew recently.
    2. fimusito
      fimusito 26 May 2014 12: 42
      +11
      Some nonsense. It is doubtful that American sailors will be distracted by Iranian fishermen. It is better to launch a barge with naked girls to them - then there really is a chance that American sailors will be distracted.
      1. Morgan
        Morgan 26 May 2014 12: 56
        +3
        They are also interested in men ... HOMOSYATINA they can serve ... in the city. laughing laughing laughing laughing
        PS The plan is absolutely utopian from "Iranian boats have sunk"!
      2. Zenturion77
        Zenturion77 26 May 2014 12: 57
        +3
        I’m afraid that ALREADY will not fail, because LGBT fighters are not distracted by such nonsense (naked girls). So there are fishing boats with Iranians.)
      3. Neksel
        Neksel 26 May 2014 12: 57
        +1
        Quote: fimusito
        Some nonsense. It is doubtful that American sailors will be distracted by Iranian fishermen. It is better to launch a barge with naked girls to them - then there really is a chance that American sailors will be distracted.


        in-in, the wet dreams of the guards ... But it is understandable, however, to maintain somehow national morale.
        From there, and all the rest of the child prodigy, in the form of plywood aircraft of the 5 +++ generation and similar miracles.
      4. Armax
        Armax 26 May 2014 13: 14
        +4
        As the latest NATO exercises in Latvia have shown, boats must be sent with naked men.
      5. Sasha_Bykov
        Sasha_Bykov 26 May 2014 13: 28
        +1
        QUICKLY WITH NAKED MEN, NATURALS IN AMERICA LIVING OUT ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 26 May 2014 12: 47
      +4
      It seems to me that this plan was drawn by the Americans themselves.
      1. Alex 241
        Alex 241 26 May 2014 12: 56
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        It seems to me that this plan was drawn by the Americans themselves.
        The American intelligence satellite took a picture of an aircraft carrier being built in Iran. True, this is not a real ship, but only a model of the American nuclear-powered aircraft carrier of the Nimitz class. Its dimensions are two-thirds of the prototype (photo: digitalglobe.com)
        1. Yun Klob
          Yun Klob 26 May 2014 18: 02
          +1
          Judging by the shadow, this is just a platform for practicing aiming and guidance of strike systems on an aircraft carrier.
      2. strannik595
        strannik595 26 May 2014 12: 59
        +10
        and Iran also has the idea of ​​capturing the White House and the Capitol ........... three million Iranian soldiers posing as tourists order an excursion to the sights of the capital of the District of Columbia, chewing ice cream casually twisting guards, appoint a CEC and hold a referendum. ........... is also a good and correct plan ........ but this is after the U.S. Navy is drowned by boarding from fishing boats
        Americans are at a loss for this insidious propaganda plan
        and in stock they have a couple dozen even more insidious projects wassat
    5. sssss018
      sssss018 26 May 2014 12: 58
      +3
      Yes, in my opinion they will soon be destroyed everywhere!
    6. schizophrenic
      schizophrenic 26 May 2014 13: 31
      0
      The plan is designed for fame, PR and fools who fall into it, and they will be told that we published about it. laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Aryan
        Aryan 26 May 2014 13: 39
        0
        can still parachute infected prostitutes
        1. strannik595
          strannik595 26 May 2014 14: 06
          +1
          can still parachute infected prostitutes
          ........ unfortunately, flower carriers are not provided for flowerbeds, and without this the marines are embarrassed to roll up similar girls, as the Baltic experience has shown (the idea of ​​money for love simply warps them, they are subtle natures) laughing
    7. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 26 May 2014 14: 42
      +2
      this is the topic! another sewed to a soft spot for staff! wassat
      1. MBA78
        MBA78 26 May 2014 16: 34
        +1
        In the photo, a U.S. aircraft carrier recalled a ciliator shoe
  2. mig31
    mig31 26 May 2014 12: 35
    +2
    It is necessary to help the common cause of the fight against the mattress evil empire ...
  3. Barboskin
    Barboskin 26 May 2014 12: 37
    +2
    Bullshit is complete, or just a good joke. In reality, a plan is only good for its suddenness, and after Twitter, these are just theoretical fantasies. Dreaming is not harmful.
    1. Children BuryKonya
      Children BuryKonya 26 May 2014 12: 45
      +3
      It seems that the guardians of the Islamic Revolution were trained in Ukraine.
    2. grandfather_Kostya
      grandfather_Kostya 26 May 2014 12: 51
      +3
      Lay out a plan and do the opposite!
  4. svp67
    svp67 26 May 2014 12: 38
    +5
    The plan is extremely simple:


    "Military affairs are simple and quite accessible to the common mind of a person. But fighting is difficult." K. Clausewitz
  5. TAMERLAN 7
    TAMERLAN 7 26 May 2014 12: 39
    +7
    And although I do not like the United States, Iran’s chances are close to zero. This is not a real combat plan, but a propaganda leaflet for the mentally retarded. Moreover, it is very naive!
    1. volot-voin
      volot-voin 26 May 2014 13: 07
      +1
      Quote: TAMERLAN 7
      And although I do not like the United States, Iran’s chances are close to zero. This is not a real combat plan, but a propaganda leaflet for the mentally retarded. Moreover, it is very naive!

      Interestingly, would you like Iran to post a real plan of action on the network, or send it to the CIA immediately with a notification))))
      Of course, Iran has some kind of plan for this case. Rather, the propaganda media of the USA came up with this plan, to scare their people, and they themselves posted it on the network)))
      1. TAMERLAN 7
        TAMERLAN 7 26 May 2014 13: 43
        0
        Quote: volot-voin
        Rather, the propaganda media of the USA came up with this plan, to scare their people, and they themselves posted on the network)))
        The fastest way it is. This is for "smart" Americans, they say it's not in vain that you pay money - there are enemies everywhere. Only for the United States, such a primitive plan to sculpt is strange!
        1. MBA78
          MBA78 26 May 2014 16: 44
          0
          most importantly, the whole world must show that they are not welcome anywhere
      2. clidon
        clidon 26 May 2014 20: 42
        +1
        Of course they have a real plan, but in principle, due to the limited capabilities of the Iranian armed forces, it is very close to the published one. Is that even coastal missiles will try to add "suddenly and massively."
  6. Pasus
    Pasus 26 May 2014 12: 39
    +2
    Submarine droids to help them. The Anglicos have mastered, it is time to purchase through 3 countries.
  7. HAM
    HAM 26 May 2014 12: 40
    +2
    Dreamers or fools? Although there may be a third-enemy "duck".
    1. MBA78
      MBA78 26 May 2014 16: 45
      0
      if they grab deadly gas and one boat is enough
  8. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 26 May 2014 12: 40
    +4
    For ONLY INTENTIONS to destroy US warships - BRAVO!
    Even if THIS IS A JOKE, even if THIS IS a "DUCK", let US REPU CRASH ...
  9. Giant thought
    Giant thought 26 May 2014 12: 40
    0
    On paper, everything is fine and beautiful. God will only know how it will look in reality, but it’s best that it remains only on paper.
  10. Zymran
    Zymran 26 May 2014 12: 42
    +29
    Recalled here
  11. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 26 May 2014 12: 43
    +2
    In every joke there is only a fraction of the joke, it is popular wisdom, the project is voiced, and there let the mattresses think whether it is true or disinfect.
    1. NIVH
      NIVH 26 May 2014 12: 47
      +28
      Another option ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  12. jovanni
    jovanni 26 May 2014 12: 45
    +1
    "And a US Navy warship is unlikely to allow fishing boats to approach."

    Well, it’s just that simple. You can adjust rafts instead of boats. In general, the Persians are great!
    1. Ural guys
      Ural guys 26 May 2014 12: 50
      +18
      Boats are possible and unlikely, but such a thing, and even in such quantities, is simply not realistic. Anyway, at least one, but will fly!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  13. Ilik
    Ilik 26 May 2014 12: 46
    +4
    It’s better to launch a barge with naked girls


    Well, what am the girls. they have one homosexual there. they will burn the girls as unnecessary.
    1. Gomel
      Gomel 26 May 2014 13: 39
      +2
      this is Iran they have with naked girls strictly and stress
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Ural guys
      Ural guys 27 May 2014 08: 21
      0
      We have already launched two. The result of 220 warriors in a hospital bed http://warfiles.ru/show-58200-rotu-ukrainskih-soldat-otpravili-na-lechenie-posle
      -dosuga-s-dvumya-devushkami.html - A company of Ukrainian soldiers was sent for treatment after leisure time with two girls.
  14. bmv04636
    bmv04636 26 May 2014 12: 48
    +2
    AI's most powerful fleet has only 13 mine-sweeping ships
  15. Rubmolot
    Rubmolot 26 May 2014 12: 49
    +10
    Men!

    Congratulations on your victory at the 2014 World Hockey Championship!
    drinks
    1. Ural guys
      Ural guys 26 May 2014 12: 57
      +10
      Here is some more good news.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  16. Polevik
    Polevik 26 May 2014 12: 52
    +1
    Quote: MOISEY
    The funniest thing is if a real precedent for such an attack occurs, and even funnier if it ends successfully. Then US military analysts can be fired.


    Here Psaki will howl: "About Russian terrorists, with a dastardly deception, they sank a peaceful warship"
    1. Ural guys
      Ural guys 26 May 2014 12: 59
      +1
      It will not howl, for it simply will not have time!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  17. bulvas
    bulvas 26 May 2014 12: 52
    +1
    Better "Klaba" on container ships

    They will not dare to drown, when they understand - it will be too late
  18. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 26 May 2014 12: 53
    0
    Against a single ship, you will definitely succeed. Besides, if you cover the "fishermen" with smoke there is a chance to break through to the group of ships. In fact, it would be better to make a powerful air defense zone over the strait and under its cover to strike missiles from land. Apparently for this s-300 and blocked.
  19. surovts.valery
    surovts.valery 26 May 2014 12: 55
    +2
    Yes, and a warship of the US Navy is unlikely to admit "fishing" boats.

    Would he be able to let them in? And in areas of intensive shipping, in waterways, in the waters of ports? In Soviet times, the Americans said: "Naval service is not easy, but the Russians made it unbearable." So now, let them shake with fear, let them see enemies everywhere. Let the earth burn everywhere and water boil under their feet, and something falls from above!
  20. Nester
    Nester 26 May 2014 12: 57
    0
    Have a fun day on the site. Some burn Merkava, others drown the fleet, still others think what to do if Russia attacks.
  21. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 26 May 2014 12: 59
    +2
    Someone really wants to make the Iranians fools.
  22. Arh
    Arh 26 May 2014 13: 01
    0
    This is classified information as the US Navy will be sunk!))) laughing
  23. Akvadra
    Akvadra 26 May 2014 13: 02
    +1
    In my opinion, F. Ushakov said: "Russian sailors are best at doing things that are not feasible." Maybe this also concerns our neighbors ...
  24. Andreitch
    Andreitch 26 May 2014 13: 03
    0
    I have only one question, and who, or what prevents Russia from helping Iran in the struggle for independence? soldier
    1. Juborg
      Juborg 26 May 2014 13: 15
      +2
      For starters, Russia itself needs to achieve independence. In our country, the constitution was written in the corridors of the State Department.
    2. Tiamat2702
      Tiamat2702 26 May 2014 13: 26
      0
      By the way, do not forget that the Iranians have already planted an American drone, and in 2000, one of the arly berks was damaged by the Yemenis (repair of about 250 million green) with one boat ... Therefore, these guys should not be underestimated.
    3. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 26 May 2014 15: 05
      +1
      Quote: Andreich
      What is stopping Russia from helping Iran fight for independence?

      Igor, clarifying the question: "Has Iran already lost its sovereignty?" Apparently I missed something when I watched the hockey final!
  25. siberko
    siberko 26 May 2014 13: 04
    0
    But how did you forget about divers with guns for spearfishing!? ...
  26. FREGATENKAPITAN
    FREGATENKAPITAN 26 May 2014 13: 06
    +5
    The Americans were a little bewildered by this insidious propaganda plan. If such a scheme works against a single ship, it will still be useless against a group. And the US Navy warship is unlikely to let "fishing" boats to itself. Here I do not agree with the author, have you ever sailed in such waters as the Strait of Hormuz (the narrowest place is 54 km), the English Channel, the Norwegian Sea and others ............. several hundred targets (read fishermen, civilian vessels) ....... Sometimes you try to swim up for hours to determine a place, etc. , so as not to raise a fisherman to the bridge ...... So it’s very difficult not to let anyone, especially in the narrowness, someone ......... Of course they will not destroy the aircraft carrier group, but it will have losses very heavy
  27. HAM
    HAM 26 May 2014 13: 10
    0
    Then the Chinese will be easier, they have a much larger population, respectively, the johnk with saboteurs even more. Maybe China does not need a fleet?
  28. Mikola-78
    Mikola-78 26 May 2014 13: 11
    0
    Harness Iranians)
  29. volot-voin
    volot-voin 26 May 2014 13: 11
    0
    The plan, of course, is "for the media," but real cooperation with Iran in the military sphere, the sale of arms to it, would not hurt.
  30. Juborg
    Juborg 26 May 2014 13: 12
    0
    History has shown more than once when the impossible is possible. You don't have to go far, in Yugoslavia a stealth missile was shot down. Who sent the entire invisible project to the trash.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 26 May 2014 13: 40
      +1
      Yes, it was shot down by an old rocket, BUT VERY SMART COMMANDER!
  31. semuil
    semuil 26 May 2014 13: 28
    +1
    If such a scheme worked against a single ship, it would still be useless against the group. Yes, and a warship of the US Navy is unlikely to admit "fishing" boats.
    In the open ocean, this will not work, but even this is not necessary in the bay, there is rocket technology. And knowing in advance the intentions of the Americans to build a defense however they can, there are no fools either.
  32. Yugra
    Yugra 26 May 2014 13: 31
    0
    And the Iranians will throw American ships with baubles on a solid fishing line, then for sure, a kayuk ...
  33. mackonya
    mackonya 26 May 2014 13: 33
    0
    This is from the same section as "under what conditions can MS-1 destroy Mouse".
  34. AID.S
    AID.S 26 May 2014 13: 33
    +1
    A plan from Iranian Zadornov, or maybe not Iranian ...
  35. Metal bro
    Metal bro 26 May 2014 13: 33
    +1
    a cunning plan for self-destruction of Iran, in general
  36. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 26 May 2014 13: 35
    0
    Iran made absolutely correct conclusions from the Yugoslav war and the war in Iraq ... we must try to counteract and inflict maximum damage on the US Navy ... which will significantly weaken the effect (or even make it impossible) of any ground operation.
    1. Orc-xnumx
      Orc-xnumx 26 May 2014 13: 51
      0
      The only thing that can be achieved with such statements is some withdrawal of US Navy ships from the territorial waters of Iran. The range of the ship's "tomahawks" is still enough.
  37. Alex_Popovson
    Alex_Popovson 26 May 2014 13: 40
    +3
    Bullshit, Iran’s slab is now bad in the economy, and in the social sphere it’s not cloudy, and you won’t be fed up with Islam no matter how much Ayatollah broadcasts to them. So they prepare people for the mythical threat from Shaitan.
  38. Orc-xnumx
    Orc-xnumx 26 May 2014 13: 46
    +2
    In general - propaganda, and nothing more!
  39. xbhxbr-777
    xbhxbr-777 26 May 2014 13: 48
    +1
    In the East there are people who were the first to bring knowledge, culture, medicine, construction, etc. to the geyropu, are Iranians really so stupid to write such stupid things ?! Only American or pro-Western dissidents can let such a duck go!
  40. raketchik
    raketchik 26 May 2014 13: 48
    +1
    It’s time to soak the corporations oops the corporal gave !!!
    1. REDBLUE
      REDBLUE 26 May 2014 14: 17
      0
      Soon you will receive the youngest)))
  41. jekasimf
    jekasimf 26 May 2014 13: 48
    +1
    Yeah. I will help the lords of the Iranians: wassat
  42. archi.sailor
    archi.sailor 26 May 2014 14: 05
    +3
    Quote: Orc-78
    In general - propaganda, and nothing more!

    the most common thought in the discussion, in my opinion. Plus to you! hi
  43. lars
    lars 26 May 2014 14: 12
    +1
    And if the speedboat "jammer" that was on our Drying, which flew over D. Cook (so much so that Aegis "was blown away)?
  44. REDBLUE
    REDBLUE 26 May 2014 14: 16
    0
    Quote: Aryan
    can still parachute infected prostitutes

    And prostitutes. But the second need more.
  45. vvp2412
    vvp2412 26 May 2014 14: 46
    0
    Regarding: "It is unlikely to let" - the destroyer Cole - showed that they can let.
  46. sledge
    sledge 26 May 2014 14: 51
    -1
    ALL! Kapets Penddii! drinks
  47. Belbizback
    Belbizback 26 May 2014 14: 57
    0
    It's time to break these Yankees!
  48. Volozhanin
    Volozhanin 26 May 2014 14: 59
    0
    And it will all end with the Iranians being piled again and again, as during Operation Praying Mantis.
  49. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 26 May 2014 15: 39
    +2
    Excuse me, but with what the Iranians were going to destroy American ships:
    The naval composition of the Iranian fleet:
    3 DEPL project 877, delivered from Russia to 1992, 1993, 1997 gg accordingly, the first Tareq-boat was repaired in 2012 by Iranian forces.

    Diesel-electric submarines of the "Fateh" type, one in service, the second is being built for the Caspian Sea - most likely similar to the German project 206
    20 mini submarine project Al-Ghadir- Iranian production, construction continues

    1 mini submarine project Al-Sabehat
    2 mini submarine project Nahang- North Korean project, built using the DPRK
    4 mini submarines of the Yugo project - delivered from the DPRK in the 90's
    Another Qaaem submarine is under construction, with a displacement of 1000 tons.
    Surface ships:
    3 light frigates of the British project "Vosper Mk.5" - "Alvand" - were delivered under the Shah (4 were delivered in total, but one was sunk in 1988.
    Americans), modernized by the Iranians, they are equipped with Chinese anti-ship missiles YJ-82 (C-802) -4 PU. The weaknesses of the ship include weak air defense - outdated shipborne air defense system "Sea Cat" (10 missiles);

    2 "destroyers", in Iranian terminology, but rather light frigates of the Moudge type: 1-Jamaran, entered the fleet in 2010, 2- Velayat for the Caspian Sea was launched on March 17 last year. They are a further development of the Alvand project. Displacement: 1420 tons. (for comparison, the displacement of the corvette of the project is 20380-2200 tons, and the MRK of the project is 21631-949 tons). Armament: 2 air defense systems "Merhab" (a copy of the American RIM-66 "Standard", 4 Iranian clones of the Chinese anti-ship missiles C-802, which in turn are a clone of the French "Exocett", with a firing range of 80-120 km, 76-mm AU Fajr 27 (copy of Oto-Melar), 2 20-mm "Erlikon" with manual guidance.In total, it is planned to build 4-6 ships.

    Another frigate "Moudge 5" is under construction, laid down in 2012. Estimated displacement of 2,000-2,500 tons, armament similar to Moudge-class frigates, but a helicopter hangar is planned, which will house either a Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion helicopter, or 2 Bell-Augusta 212
    3 Corvette:
    2 type Bayandor, American-built 60-s (all delivered 4, but 2 were sunk during the Iran-Iraq war), modernized by the Iranians, rearmament 4 anti-ship missiles S-802
    1 type Hamzeh, the former Shah yacht of the 1936 year of construction, on the Caspian Sea. Also armed with 4 RCC C-802.
    1. Roman 1977
      Roman 1977 26 May 2014 15: 42
      0
      Missile boats are the most numerous class of ships of the Iranian Navy:
      10 type Houdong Chinese-built, transferred in 1994-1996, armed with 4 anti-ship missiles YJ-82 (C-802). Are part of the Navy "Guards of the Islamic Revolution"

      10 Kaman type German-built, according to the French Combattante II project, transferred in 1977-1981, originally armed with 2-4 launchers of American Harpoon anti-ship missiles, now 4 YJ-82 (C-802) anti-ship missiles are rearmed
      4 type Sina-Iranian built, further development of Kaman type RCA: 2 (Paykan, Joshan) in the Caspian, armed with 4 anti-ship missiles YJ-82 (C-802)

      8 Kalat, a semi-submersible boat built in North Korea, is armed with 4 Chinese anti-ship missiles YJ-82 (C-802).
      97 patrol boats:
      3 type American-built Parvin, re-equipped with 2 Iranian anti-ship missiles Nasr

      2 type Kaivan Iranian-built, armed with 1 40-mm AU, 2 ZU-23, 2 DShK

      92 Iranian Bavar Type

      1 minesweeper type Riazi
      Amphibious forces:
      4 TDC type Hengam
      2 landing ship type Iran Ajr
      landing ships of the type Iran Hormuz-24
      MDK type Iran Hormuz-21
      2 MDK type Chavoush
      Fouque type MDK (MIG-S-3700)
      Wellington hovercraft (BH-7)
      Eunice-6 hovercraft.

      Fleet Air Force:
      3 minesweeper RH-53D
      10 anti-submarine helicopters SH-3 Sea King
      14 anti-submarine helicopters AB 212ASW
      1 Mi-17,
      5 transport aircraft (1 Falcon 20 for VIP transport, 4 Fokker F27)
  50. Indifferent
    Indifferent 26 May 2014 16: 01
    +2
    If an Iranian fisherman steps forward on the course and throws modern mines, then everything can be! Now even a small mine will make such a "hole" that the ship will be deprived of the opportunity to continue carrying out the mission. True, such an action will be one-time, but it is quite possible!