Military Review

Nikita Mikhalkov: why Russia is silent in response to all sanctions

57
In the new edition of his author’s Besogon program, Nikita Mikhalkov presents different points of view on recent events in Ukraine, and also discusses why Russia is silent in response to all sanctions, statements by the West and attempts to drag it into numerous disputes and confrontations.


57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexey N
    Alexey N 26 May 2014 06: 54
    +12
    Who cares what this major old man thinks? It wags, dodges, slippery as a fish. In February he was generally neutral, looked around, and suddenly Russia supported the Maidan, laid out links to classics of literature. Lived to gray hair, but his opinion is not.
    1. mad
      mad 26 May 2014 06: 58
      +3
      I agree, this type is one of those that the Motherland considers where the ass is warm. But she will sell it on occasion ...
      1. Alexey N
        Alexey N 26 May 2014 06: 59
        +1
        And the director of it is worthless.
        1. Very old
          Very old 26 May 2014 07: 35
          +6
          The director is not shitty, it’s shitty that every bohemian considers it almost a duty to be noted on the political field
          Hence, all the other "Makarevichs" - got divorced, PANIMASH (used to say ebn)
          1. Alexey N
            Alexey N 26 May 2014 07: 53
            +1
            Everyone has their own opinion smile He was not a shitty actor, and then he played himself. And he is a disastrous director and is much below average. And about the "bohemian party-goers" I agree.
            1. ed65b
              ed65b 26 May 2014 08: 23
              0
              Mikhalkov the magnificent CAMERA director he a priori does not succeed in large-scale films.
              1. CALL.
                CALL. 26 May 2014 09: 54
                +2
                Quote: ed65b
                Nikita Mikhalkov: why Russia is silent in response to all sanctions

                But Nikita applied his @ shit to the Russophobic company in Ukraine. Who will respect the nation whose soldiers are driven with sticks, instead of rifles, to German machine guns, by the evil nkvdeshniki on Stalin's orders. All the abomination of the "tired" is the kind of feces that a Russian liberalist is capable of. And his name is a scoundrel.
      2. obraztsov
        obraztsov 26 May 2014 07: 12
        +13
        I also had a low opinion of him. Especially after millions of failed projects. After the story with flashing lights. After the bill on CD discs.
        But I accidentally watched this program in Russia 24. I advise everyone to watch it. He gives little of his opinion, mostly reads letters, essays, articles. And I must say he selects them in such a way that the meaning of the angry letters of Ukrainian "patriots" by itself sinks below the plinth, their arguments begin to seem quite petty and insignificant.
        1. ed65b
          ed65b 26 May 2014 08: 25
          +5
          the last three issues watched the wagonless. Mikhalkov really Demons in Ukraine shows. Speaks exactly in the subject.
      3. 225chay
        225chay 26 May 2014 08: 50
        +2
        Quote: mad
        I agree, this type is one of those that the Motherland considers where the ass is warm. But she will sell it on occasion ...


        And then he noted.
        Who is interested in the opinion of this migalkin ...
        conjuncturist.
    2. Neighbor
      Neighbor 26 May 2014 06: 59
      +4
      +++++ Yes, and nothing more to say ....
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Flinky
      Flinky 26 May 2014 07: 21
      0
      So this is one family. The Mikhalkovs have always been opportunists, nothing has changed since Sergei's dad.
      1. 225chay
        225chay 26 May 2014 08: 53
        0
        Quote: Flinky
        So this is one family. The Mikhalkovs have always been opportunists, nothing has changed since Sergei's dad.


        10000 %% one to one ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Hon
        Hon 26 May 2014 13: 26
        0
        Quote: Flinky
        So this is one family. The Mikhalkovs have always been opportunists, nothing has changed since Sergei's dad.

        Nikita Mikhalkov (until 23.05.2011/XNUMX/XNUMX Migalkov) - a charismatic clever, possessing an amazing ability to settle well under any authority. The Russian-Soviet is a little actor (he is a player himself), a little director, on TV a great wrestler with oskotinivaniem. Skillful master of budget money allocated for culture, a bearer of the Olympic flag at a ceremony in Sochi, a master of kicking, licking.
        Evil tongues assert that the ancestors of the subject Sabzh Mikhalkov were prisoners under the kings. This post has sunk into oblivion, but the habit has remained. Pope Nikita non-selectively owned the Writers' Union. The August Revolution of 1991 deprived Mikhalkov’s estate, but since 1997, Nikita, who had been in a row, has seized the Union of Filmmakers.
      4. Denis
        Denis 26 May 2014 18: 51
        0
        Quote: Flinky
        So this is one family

        Russia, you hear a terrible itch
        three Mikhalkov creep on you (s) V. Gaft
    5. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 26 May 2014 09: 14
      +1
      Quote: Alexey N
      Who cares what this major old man thinks?

      I don't really respect him as a person, but it's stupid to say "not interesting"
      1. Hleb
        Hleb 26 May 2014 10: 20
        +4
        Vladimir is a very interesting video. Above people switched to Mikhalkov’s personality, they’re the essence of the drum, they didn’t watch the video. Nobody brought any arguments against his opinion. They simply won’t be able to.
        it’s a pity that an interesting site today collects for the most part screamers
        1. shapkin14
          shapkin14 26 May 2014 15: 43
          +1
          Yes!
          Above are comments from the "dumb self" series.
          I think Mikhalkov’s thoughts in Besogon are right
        2. The comment was deleted.
    6. Svetlana
      Svetlana 26 May 2014 12: 00
      0
      Everything has already been said about Ukraine by great people before us. In this case, your opinion is the agreement or disagreement with the classics, who many years ago identified this topic and predicted problems of this kind, since they have been and always will be, the whole history of mankind. The question is not who has what opinion, everyone can have their own opinion, but how to solve the problem, what to do specifically.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. Hon
      Hon 26 May 2014 13: 17
      0
      Quote: Alexey N
      Who cares what this major old man thinks? It wags, dodges, slippery as a fish. In February he was generally neutral, looked around, and suddenly Russia supported the Maidan, laid out links to classics of literature. Lived to gray hair, but his opinion is not.

      In the beginning there was still nothing, and then he was completely carried away. By the way, he is shooting a new movie, about the revolution of 17, he has not changed the name of himself "Sunstroke"
  2. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 26 May 2014 07: 02
    +2
    the old monarchist is clever ... but the demons seem to be obsessed with himself.
  3. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 26 May 2014 07: 04
    +2
    Quote: Alexey N
    Who cares what this major old man thinks?

    Is it really interesting what the corrupt creatures are generally thinking or talking about? You can't wash yourself, Nikitushka, for all your "creativity", like "Citadel" ...
    1. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 26 May 2014 08: 46
      +6
      You can treat Mikhalkov as you like, but his transmission is necessary and very timely: in order to beat the "enemy" you need to study him well, know all his "ins and outs", so he showed the National Assembly all the "wretchedness" of thinking of Ukrainians "washed" by the West. And to tear a shirt on his chest and explain that Mikhalkov is so-so, just taking our community away from the essence of the problem!
      1. vignat21
        vignat21 26 May 2014 15: 23
        -2
        And in order to get away from the essence of the problem, these screamers go over to Mikhalkov’s personality. I also noticed that a large number of screaming trolls are gathering on the site. And I consider the National Assembly a great Russian cinematographer.
  4. nemec55
    nemec55 26 May 2014 07: 05
    0
    Horseradish director with a shitty opinion
  5. demotivator
    demotivator 26 May 2014 07: 12
    +4
    Last year, he snatched another portion of money in the amount of 300 million rubles for a historical film he was planning on serfdom in Russia. Now he will make us happy at our expense with his next expensive "masterpiece".
    “The Bolsheviks did a terrible thing; they erased from the memory of the people our cultural heritage, memories of all that good and bright that was in the Russian people, including the memory of serfdom. Restoring the historical truth is our task ”
    Is it any wonder - the hereditary serfman dreams of serfdom, this is natural.
  6. Narkom
    Narkom 26 May 2014 07: 16
    +1
    Let's publish the "experts from Kashchenko" ...
  7. gandalf
    gandalf 26 May 2014 07: 19
    0
    Nikita is the pale shadow of her father ...

    He crawled out on dad’s inheritance while dad was alive - he made good films (maybe dad shot?) ...
  8. oppps
    oppps 26 May 2014 07: 19
    +3
    Good morning!!!


    Tolerance to Mikhalkov here does not smell ...
  9. Name
    Name 26 May 2014 07: 20
    +2
    Greetings to all! The thing to do, not 3,14 .. to do like the Anglo-Saxons. Russia silently does business, but Europe and the United States are nervous.
  10. sv68
    sv68 26 May 2014 07: 21
    +2
    the muddy type of Mikhalkov is not a fish, not a cape. Now he says one thing, and tomorrow he will blurt out something completely different. I don’t have any confidence in him
  11. Denis
    Denis 26 May 2014 07: 42
    0
    He got out, but they began to forget about him, a political scientist .... ev
    Like the one that wrote a letter to the president about corruption, and then he became a Judas and ran with jopto-black flag
  12. Kushadasov
    Kushadasov 26 May 2014 07: 49
    0
    Migalkov mentioned in this story that he is now filming his new film masterpiece "Sunstroke". I am already scared. Another crap and crap.
  13. Turkir
    Turkir 26 May 2014 08: 16
    0
    Yesterday he is a communist, today a democrat, and tomorrow a monarchist.
    But in general, an egoist.
    1. 225chay
      225chay 26 May 2014 08: 56
      0
      Quote: Turkir
      Yesterday he is a communist, today a democrat, and tomorrow a monarchist.
      But in general, an egoist.


      briefly g ... n
      1. Turkir
        Turkir 26 May 2014 10: 28
        +1
        We were put down by those who have not enough arguments.
        So we are right.
        1. saber1357
          saber1357 26 May 2014 22: 08
          +1
          Oh no, everything is much simpler - "don't touch the libergo ... but it doesn't stink." Why else waste arguments on those who are known to be a troll?
  14. Free wind
    Free wind 26 May 2014 08: 23
    0
    A person who has fallen to the level of a cat’s cat’s mouse, or whatever it is called, well, where dozens kill everyone, led by a flasher. respect is not worthy. And which of us did the sanctions hurt? Yesterday 24 across Russia showed several interviews with businessmen, they answered all the questions about sanctions as one, there are no sanctions.
  15. ed65b
    ed65b 26 May 2014 08: 30
    +1
    That you comrades ran a steam rink at Mikhalkov. by the way, he never once turned the Russian nationalist out of his way. And after the return of Crimea to my homeland, I don’t recognize him at all. Who is who, and Mikhalkov was the first nationalized in Russia. Well, what about business? Well, no one is without sin.
  16. Pavellio
    Pavellio 26 May 2014 08: 36
    0
    - Nikita, how do you like the movie?
    - Admired by this talented director! I take off my hat!
    - Nikita, we know that you take off your hat - how do you like the movie ??
  17. kodxnumx
    kodxnumx 26 May 2014 09: 01
    0
    No comments!
  18. Zebus
    Zebus 26 May 2014 09: 53
    +4
    A man speaks correctly !!!
    And the "criticism" of some colleagues that he is a lousy director, so YOU ​​AND CARDS IN HAND! Go ahead to make Oscar-winning films and play roles in the palm-branch-cannie movies !!! Yes, at worst, create your own "TV-prime-time" channel and criticize it in full "gentlemen-film critics-political scientists-divano-t
    action-strategists "!!!
    PS I didn’t want to offend anyone !!!
    PPS But if you still offended someone, then I apologize !!!
    PPPS And if someone recognizes himself, then I understand the criticism and I hope that it will be corrected smile
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 26 May 2014 10: 20
      +1
      He said everything correctly! I support.
  19. Turkir
    Turkir 26 May 2014 10: 34
    0
    From the philosophy of Taoism:
    If the right person does the wrong thing, then the thing becomes right.
    If the wrong person does the right thing, then the thing becomes wrong.
    -------
    1. saber1357
      saber1357 26 May 2014 22: 09
      -3
      Learn the Russian language, if you have gone to Russia, and not to teach us Chinese, little pig.
      1. northern
        northern 26 May 2014 22: 51
        0
        Better a prostitute's daughter than a corporal's son
      2. Turkir
        Turkir 27 May 2014 01: 16
        0
        So you can’t learn Russian either. What a Chinese ..
  20. northern
    northern 26 May 2014 10: 50
    0
    Nikita Mikhalkov (until 23.05.2011/XNUMX/XNUMX Migalkov) - a charismatic clever, possessing the parasitic ability to settle well under any authority. The Russian-Soviet is a little actor (he is a player himself), a little director, on TV a great wrestler with oskotinivaniem. A skilled master of budget money allocated for culture (see also Tsereteli), a bearer of the Olympic flag at a ceremony in Sochi, a master of kicking, licking.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 26 May 2014 21: 44
      +1
      Quote: north
      Nikita Mikhalkov (until 23.05.2011 Migalkov)

      He was not Migalkov, never. He poured mud over a man, but who? And what do you leave a heap of shit on Russian soil after you?
      1. northern
        northern 26 May 2014 22: 30
        +1
        What are you saying? I felt ashamed straight. But, by chance I came across, but it’s not him, not sun-faced, it’s his envious photoshop, yeah.
  21. sso-xnumx
    sso-xnumx 26 May 2014 11: 43
    0
    PR man, rude "in the nobility." Sings what they want to hear at the top. So did dad. Still wondering who helped him to shoot "One of the strangers ..."? The rest of the films are about nothing at all. I watched only for the sake of interest and spat with disgust!
  22. karal
    karal 26 May 2014 11: 57
    +1
    To hell with these sanctions, the main thing is that our children and grandchildren live in peace and prosperity!
  23. scorpiosys
    scorpiosys 26 May 2014 17: 16
    0
    Self-loving boor, channeling under the "white bone". Extremely muddy.
  24. Passepartout 1
    Passepartout 1 26 May 2014 20: 04
    +1
    It's a shame, gentlemen! I am ashamed of you! I was looking for this transfer. Among the many links I chose this site, considering "Voennoye Obozreniye" a solid site. However, what was my disappointment when I read your, gentlemen-comrades, comments. You have not seen the excellent article by Roman Nosik, you do not discuss the serious situation in (in) Ukraine, you do not see the seriousness of the problem. YOU don't even appreciate the fact that Nikita Sergeevich, a man undoubtedly busy, considered it important to convey to us the mood in society. You, gentlemen, comrades, excuse me, collective "balls". The country is on fire and everyone who is not indifferent does what they can. You are just SPOOKING! It does not seem shameful to you to discuss a talented director with a heart for Russia. You should be ashamed of yourself, gentlemen, to judge his family! Your children grow up on S. Mikhalkov's books. The message of the world rises as a sign of respect when the anthem written by S. Mikhalkov sounds! Watch the series of films "Russian Choice" ... You must be ashamed, gentlemen!
    1. d_trader
      d_trader 26 May 2014 21: 22
      +2
      I fully support!
    2. saber1357
      saber1357 26 May 2014 22: 11
      +1
      Why are you surprised that the concentration of trolls on VO is high today - after all, this is a MILITARY review, and the troll is a nanorobot of the information war ...
    3. Ajent cho
      Ajent cho 26 May 2014 23: 42
      0
      You are just Gossiping!

      We are not so great people to influence our statements on the world, so we do what we can: create the necessary background.
      And Mikhalkov is a man of art, one of those whose job is to amuse people. We have the right to express our opinion. By the way, the sale may well be talented.
    4. Turkir
      Turkir 27 May 2014 01: 15
      +1
      I saw this film where the Nightingale in a languid voice pulls "Ashamed, gentlemen."
      It is hardly worth imitating her, it is sweet, and therefore not sincerely.
      And the hero of Nakhapetov in the same film, stealing a film, takes pictures of the hunger that happened because of whites, allegedly in Odessa in 1918. And, oh, the miracle of cinema, the great find of the director, shown to us in the shots is hunger in the Volga region in ... 1924.
      That's really really "It's a shame, gentlemen."
      I am not one of the omnivorous moviegoers who humbly chew any gum offered by the "great" directors with a mule humility.
      As the English theater and film critic Kurt Tainen said:
      Oh don't tell me
      about Visconti and Fellini,
      those who love everyone in a row
      movie girls in a bikini.
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 27 May 2014 12: 00
        0
        Quote: Turkir
        I saw this film where the Nightingale in a languid voice pulls "Ashamed, gentlemen."

        She said there: "Gentlemen! You beasts .."
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. irat
      irat 27 May 2014 05: 01
      +2
      I will not judge Mikhalkov as a director, but I mainly support his statement
  25. northern
    northern 26 May 2014 21: 40
    0
    Attention, in the comments a couple of fans comrade Migalkov came down. What is pop, such is the coming, right? Minute all in a row, who dare to criticize the sun-faced :-)
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 26 May 2014 21: 52
      +1
      Quote: north
      Attention, in the comments a couple of fans comrade Migalkov came down.

      Whom are you warning, sentinel? "Attention ..." PonabIzhala - written through E, literate!
      1. saber1357
        saber1357 26 May 2014 22: 12
        0
        That's right, if they bayonet them. A bullet is a fool, a bayonet is well done!
      2. Turkir
        Turkir 27 May 2014 00: 57
        +1
        ran + offended = pushed smile
    2. saber1357
      saber1357 26 May 2014 22: 12
      +1
      Panabizhala, e? I’ve seen it myself from here, everything radishes and every radish comes here
      1. northern
        northern 26 May 2014 22: 29
        0
        "NabIgat" - it is customary to talk about rabid vandals and minusers. Especially, with "ashipka", so that it was clear that we are talking about idiots.