BBM "Kozak", Ukraine

30


Kozak (Rus. Kazak) - Ukrainian armored personnel carrier (armored combat vehicle, BBM) for special operations forces. For the first time, the Kozak BBM was demonstrated to the general public at a parade in honor of the Independence Day of Ukraine in Kiev 24 August 2009. The multipurpose armored vehicle BBK Kozak was developed by the Praktika Research and Production Association, a Ukrainian manufacturer of armored vehicles and technical safety equipment for banks and offices.

The BBZ "Kozak" is mainly intended for actions in the conditions of settlements, including as part of peacekeeping forces. According to the manufacturer, this is facilitated by his armament, maneuverability, comfort, anti-mine and ballistic protection. The protection system is based on a protected capsule (citadel), which is installed on the main base.
The frame principle of the capsule of the cabin allows you to vary the degree of protection by replacing removable panels on the panel of a different thickness and shape.

DEF
-class of protection - PZSA-3, PZSA-4 (AK-74, 5,45; AKM 7,62; СГД 7,62);
-V-like bottom, which withstands the 3 kg explosion in thr. Equ.;
-the lack of rigid mounting seats with the floor, reduces the risk of injury during the explosion;
- under the floor of the gas tank and the battery additionally hold the fragments;
- cross tubes provide the necessary living space when you turn the car;
- a device for radiation intelligence DRGT;
-turret.

weaponry
caliber, mm and type of machine gun (ammunition pieces) 12.7 NSVT or 12.7 CT 450 (3x150)
caliber, mm and type of machine gun (ammunition piece) 7.62 PKMS (2500)
caliber, mm and type of grenade launcher (ammunition piece) AG-17 (100)

Wheel formula 4x4
Curb weight, t 5.5
Trailer weight, t 4
Brand and type of engine IVECO, four-stroke, diesel, in-line, 4 - cylinder, with turbocharger, EURO-4
Working volume, l 3,0
Maximum power, hp Xnumx
The maximum speed, km / h 120
Power reserve, km 1000
Minimum turning radius, m 9.5
Transmission Manual ZF, 6-ti speed
Transfer box 4-modal with differential SCAM
Steering Mechanical with hydraulic booster
Main transfer Mechanical with differential
Suspension Dependent, spring with shock absorbers and anti-roll bars
Box-shaped, welded with five diameters

BBM "Kozak", Ukraine
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Erohf
    -3
    31 December 2010 05: 45
    Compared to the hummer ... .. This is a prehistoric car .. not comfortable Govnyana and little suitable for driving ... Homno * in TOPOKU
  2. ILYA
    +2
    April 9 2011 16: 14
    our GAZ-2330 "TIGER"
  3. small
    +4
    April 15 2011 08: 19
    I agree with Ilya !! And at the expense of the hummer .... so what's the difference in which coffin they bury? Fancy or zinc? And according to the tests of the same Hammer and our Zil .. The Hammer did not drive even 50 meters in the snow. // broke, and when this happens in combat conditions, let's see in which gully the "Hammerist" will look for a car service .. because by hand it it will not be possible to repair ... And in terms of security, they are approximately equal .. The difference, and, moreover, significant, only in price, and not in favor of the same hummer ..
  4. Neck
    -2
    April 23 2011 23: 11
    I don’t agree, the car certainly doesn’t look very good, but on the battlefield in such a car it’s possible to ... sit with the Germans
  5. Vladimir Balashov
    0
    3 May 2011 01: 03
    Normal car, I want this myself !!!
  6. Sergeev Dmitry
    0
    9 May 2011 10: 22
    World War II cars were prettier! She nifiga how tall she’s not where you can’t hide!
  7. Eng
    Eng
    0
    9 May 2011 14: 48
    The tiger steers and this ..., so-cutting., Modify the file.
  8. 55
    55
    -2
    9 May 2011 19: 45
    like it or not, but again the Cossack turned out. take your hands out of w ...................... and think with your head go .................... ........... carter.
  9. 55
    55
    +1
    9 May 2011 19: 48
    Here is a link a man made with his own hands http://info.drom.ru/misc/16525/
  10. Sanya
    +1
    9 June 2011 17: 18
    the "tiger" is much more beautiful and somehow more solid, and the "Cossack" has a muzzle like a Cossack.
  11. +3
    16 July 2011 10: 35
    It is astounding that now everyone is starting to feel like production of military equipment. And who developed this unit
    (((((((BBM Kozak was developed by the Praktika research and production association, the Ukrainian manufacturer of armored vehicles and technical safety equipment for banks and offices.)))))))))
    Manufacturers of canned goods and agricultural machinery will soon show their samples !!
  12. Ueraїnets = Rusin
    Ueraїnets = Rusin
    -1
    16 July 2011 12: 47
    Moskal, I read your comments more, and I become more a nationalist - a Bandera. Dyakoy Internet.
    1. 0
      16 July 2011 13: 18
      Well, what else can you expect from a true "Ueraine" wink
    2. 0
      16 July 2011 15: 07
      Do not be nervous!
      Firms producing good equipment in the world can be counted on the fingers! Read the history of the creation of the Soviet tank. Maybe you can understand the difference between the BBM and the machine for transporting dough !!!!
    3. svvaulsh
      0
      11 October 2011 16: 40
      Todi respectfully read the biography of Bandera. Zakіnchish so itself, as a rule in vlasnіy blues not enter!
    4. Insurgent
      +1
      10 November 2011 00: 06
      In Ukraine, what are the positive comments in the direction of Russia, especially in western Ukraine?
  13. Partyzan
    +1
    16 July 2011 13: 46
    APASUS
    http://www.practika.ua/
    Well, well, read about the company and its services))))) and then declare who you feel like it, it has a security profile.
    BMD Bradley is also high and it was a plus. I didn’t say that it looked like a Zaporozhets.
    In general, this machine is unlikely to go into the army, probably in the special forces. If you do not get hungry. For Army BTR Dozor /
    1. 0
      16 July 2011 15: 01
      Especially for you Partyzan Today, 13:46
      PRODUCTS

      The company has five main areas:
      Armored vehicles (VIP cars; collection vehicles; vehicles for transporting people, military armored vehicles)
      Banking equipment (valuables; doors; bank safes; archive cabinets; equipment for depositories; technical means of information protection; server rooms, currency exchange points; cash booths; security guard lockers)
      Fire fighting equipment (fire doors; gates; curtains and curtains; fireproof glazed partitions; fireproof hatches and valves)
      Equipment for nuclear power plants (hatches; gates)
      Protective glazing (bulletproof glass, armored, anti-vandal, fire-prevention and special-purpose glass).
      -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
      ---------------------------------
      And now a couple of questions on the merits:
      1 Does the dear opponent know the difference between the production of cash collection machines and the BBM.
      2 On the confusing information is the famous Nammer, recognized in the US Army (a machine that does not meet the requirements of modern combat)
      I WILL EVEN Apologize BEFORE YOU - IF US ARMY PURCHASES YOUR CARS INSTEAD OF ITS IN AFGHANISTAN,
  14. 0
    16 July 2011 15: 53
    Well, what we’ve done, we’ve done, it’s not for us to ride on it. Just because it is tall is not very good. As long as there is a firearm unguided weapon, you have to be low and flat.
  15. Partyzan
    0
    16 July 2011 16: 24
    APASUS
    The US Army will not buy Kozak, especially for Afghanistan. It is necessary to invest additional funds in the car to fit for Afghanistan)))))))
    2) There is information that tanks that do not meet the requirements of modern combat, this does not mean that this is true. Everything has its pros and cons. I consider a certain amount of infantry fighting vehicles in the army necessary (convoys, bistres, transfer of special units, small cargoes, communications), but all at once with tanks, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles.
    Hamer does not fit))) but US and Russia and Europe continue to develop BBM
    1) But you are not embarrassed that ANTONOV and YUZHMASH have developed trolleybuses and other civic vehicles .... ))) If you have specialists and finances, then it’s easy to develop a BBM from a dumper
    MAYBE Worse THAN FOREIGN ANALOGUES BUT MOSCOW DIDN'T ALSO BUILD AT ONCE. EVERYTHING COMES WITH OPTIS.
    The usual Merc to make reservations is not just to fasten armor))))

    Do you think that one factory does all this !!!!!!!!!! ????????? )))))))))))
    For the army, it would be better to buy a Watch, if in my opinion.

    1 question
    WHAT A KOZAK worse than your TIGER ???? if not mistaken, the characteristics are approximately the same as all BBMs of this type.
    1. 0
      16 July 2011 17: 10
      Well, again ........ what are you doing slow-witted you are mine!
      The collector armored car is a box on wheels. But to design, produce a chassis that (with the explosion of 6 kg of landmine) will allow the soldiers to stay alive and continue to perform the combat mission - THIS IS A WHOLE SCIENCE.
      Of course, I am glad that the country's economy can master the production of new products, but usually R&D is financed by the state on such topics! And there are serious institutions working there. Just look at such machines as (BBM) Dingo 2, Cougar, Aravis, Gefas. Maybe you can understand the difference .. ..
  16. 0
    16 July 2011 17: 57
    When I first saw this car in Kiev at the May 9 parade, I didn’t like it. Then I compared the "Kozak" with the American Humvee, it seemed that our car was not worse at all, but even better!
  17. Partyzan
    0
    16 July 2011 18: 29
    APASUS
    Well, yes, I looked sympathetic))))) it is clear that this is a whole science !!!!!!!!!! Nobody argues.
    But
    Take a look at http://www.practika.ua/production/armored_vehicles
    Collector cars
    Military cars
    Collector's trucks and so on
    Not from the ceiling the class is different !!!!! And judging about the quality of the article, regarding the new enterprise BRED.
    NORMALLY A COUNTRY, it was beating in the USSR, right now in Ukraine, power which HEX ** does not want to do except to earn money without investing !!!!!!!!!!!!! Especially in the United States, many military enterprises are private and successfully operate. There is such as COOPERATION to survive all the defense industry of Ukraine cooperates with anyone. Moreover, this enterprise has been working for more than one year.
    I understood!!!! what is your logic, the enterprise that was founded 50 years ago for the military commanders better than 15 with a civilian slant, BUT NOT ALWAYS all the more so in Ukraine. I also thought so before, but not now.
    Okay, I think we understood each other and we will remain with our opinion, it would be more pleasant for me to see this car in a series than talk without apathy.
    By the way, some BBM offer by you in the wrong weight category (Aravis is an armored troop carrier even if it’s called Tactical car)
    There is a difference, but behind this logic you need to buy everything in a foreign country and score everything !!!!
    1. -1
      16 July 2011 21: 39
      Partyzan Today, 18:29
      The release of military equipment requires not only a similar manufacturer profile (release of collection vehicles), but also enough specific knowledge and technology !!!!
      And "Kozak" is a rather crude machine. The angularity of the car, assembly for welding the hood, aluminum handles, not an integrated communication unit in the torpedo, shows the lack of experience and technology of this company.
      This company needs to grow, but such a specific product requires serious investments.
      My logic is that everyone should do their own thing! I think that such a machine Kharkov software them. Malysheva, would have made more professionally ..............
    2. slan
      0
      16 July 2011 21: 53
      Yes, it’s not in 15 years and not in Ukraine. It’s just essentially a homemade product. If this product of garage craftsmen falls into real operating conditions typical of military equipment, an endless list of irreparable structural defects, imperfection of production technology, build quality, etc. will be immediately revealed. etc. Therefore, if this technique gets into the troops, it will be a deviation. And for the Muhosran branch of the bank for 2-3 trips a week for 50 km, such a technique may be relevant, but only from a limited budget. Think about why AvtoVAZ bought a platform from Renault for a lot of money, Volvo uses the Ford platform, etc. It is not so easy to make a reliable and good car, and a reliable armored military all the more. And to buy an Iveco engine, a box of ZF .. and assemble it in the building of a rural car repair shop of such a freak, the occupation is not new and the result is predictable. It seems that they tried to convey this to you.
  18. Partyzan
    0
    16 July 2011 23: 39
    APASUS
    Kharkov developed Dozor-A, the same class.
    I agree. But any NEW development will be blue at first. And about the specifics of the enterprise, so the SIEMENS company now has an assortment that our companies hug and cry, also began to gradually. The fact that far from ideal will not until orders begin unfortunately. In us, now the fashion has gone to the blue idea to do and when orders appear to finish (((((Kharkovsky now works
    Slan
    Well, I agree that the garage option, but so far there is no order, an enterprise not specially targeted earlier will not delay the completion of the technology. (not the fact that orders will be).
    I was starting from the fact that the armor (for VIPs and collectors) gives 100% weight and the plant considers this, so they thought about the platform. The armor is the same as on the bucks (the statement characteristics are normal). Especially considerable experience
    It is clear and agree, but if there is nothing to do then this will not happen. And to correct errors before mass production but with the order as an option, the more this machine is declared as for special troops, and they will operate in cities, this is not an army option. For the army of the ray DOZOR-A and B

    slan APASUS
    THANKS FOR THE ARGUMENTATION !!!!!!!!!!! )))))))))
  19. -1
    17 July 2011 14: 14
    Enough for banks, but no more
    1. Noni4
      -2
      18 July 2011 14: 57
      Already tested? Down
  20. 0
    19 July 2011 00: 28
    I don’t understand the subject of srach, they created it, they created it, well, they don’t skate, after a couple of three battles we will see what this chariot is worth, how far has it gone from the "goat" ...
    By the way, about the tiger and the punisher in the Caucasus, too, do not hear a damn ...
  21. Owl
    0
    19 July 2011 08: 50
    similar to the "TIGER": there are no "cilia" on the front and side windows, there are no embrasures in the sides and stern, an "enemy" engine is installed, the open upper hatch does not cover from fire. Probably done just as clumsy.
  22. kesa1111
    0
    11 October 2011 16: 32
    Scorpio LTA is better.

    Scorpio LTA is better.
  23. kesa1111
    +2
    11 October 2011 16: 32
    Scorpio LTA is better.
  24. gunship
    0
    6 March 2012 18: 13
    Quote: Dmitry Sergeev
    World War II cars were prettier! She nifiga how tall she’s not where you can’t hide!

    Well, this is not an auto show. High because the bottom is V-shaped, and beauty is not the main thing, although it’s nice when the car is beautiful and the performance characteristics are good. I visually like the Tiger more.