Military Review

M.Leontiev: "The economic policy of the government is an atavism"

85
M.Leontiev: "The economic policy of the government is an atavism"In the scenarios described by Medvedev, there is no development


It has been two years since the approval of Dmitry Medvedev as the head of the Russian government. Experts analyze the activities of the Cabinet in the last two years, and the media convey the words of the prime minister that the Russian economy is waiting for two hypothetical scenarios.

According to Medvedev, according to the first version, the economy will show a slight increase, but an equally slight drop. In this case, the population will not feel any significant changes in their lives. The second option is hard and unlikely, but the state will fulfill social obligations in any case.

A well-known analyst Mikhail Leontiev gives his assessment of the activities of the Medvedev government.

Russia, voluntarily or involuntarily, will be affected by the external conjuncture

- Before I start commenting, I must make one important reservation. All that I have said is my personal opinion, in no way connected with the position of my employer. That is, in this case, I act as a private person, as a citizen of the Russian Federation, endowed with freedom of speech, and not as a representative of the company-employer.

So, in the scenarios described by Medvedev there is no development. It is excluded by the conceptual vision of the team that Medvedev directs. I mean the economic block of the government. Previously, Kudrin and Ulyukayev considered the external conjuncture to be the main one, which determines the pace of the country's development. In this sense, nothing has changed, their optimism or pessimism depends on the analysis of the conjuncture, and on how maneuvers one can resist this conjuncture from their point of view.

When the crisis broke out, it became clear that Russia would be affected by the external conjuncture: it would not happen like a skating. Willingly or unwittingly, through direct collapse of markets or through increased tension, through political turbulence or through political pressure, but this will happen.

To dismiss the government or not - this question I will not comment

Of course, it is impossible to be completely independent of the external market, but the fact of development should not depend on the external conjuncture. At the same time, the task was set to develop such a scenario for the development of the country that would take into account this circumstance.

Now I hear that we will switch to our own payment system, to pay for energy for rubles, it’s not for me to protest against this. But when I hear such a question being posed by people who are conceptually confident that these measures will lead to death, I have nothing to comment on. Something to say on this topic is only a callus on the tongue to rub.

It seems to me that such a formulation of a fork in the path of development is suicidal for the government. The economic bloc is in sharp contradiction with my understanding of what the Russian economy needs.

The government’s economic policy is atavism, not even appendicitis, but a tail. Under current conditions, the entire economic concept is an atavism, although of course, you can walk with a tail: a small one sticking out of your pants behind, I emphasize, behind. But dismiss the government or not - I will not comment on this question.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru/economics/2014/05/21/dmitrii-medvedev/740558-mleontev-ekonomicheskaya-politika-pravitelstva-eto-atav
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. maskwich
    maskwich 24 May 2014 14: 32
    +15
    It’s time for Medvedev to send an honorary resignation by the rector of some university, from him there is nothing besides harm to Russia. IMHO hi
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 24 May 2014 14: 34
      +21
      Quote: maskwitch
      the honorary resignation of the rector of some university, from him, apart from harm, there is nothing for Russia


      Does a university student mean any pity?
      1. mamont5
        mamont5 24 May 2014 14: 46
        +21
        Quote: Vadivak
        Quote: maskwitch
        the honorary resignation of the rector of some university, from him, apart from harm, there is nothing for Russia


        Does a university student mean any pity?


        Retire him and let him sit in social networks, inform.voyu leads. Maybe there will be more benefit from him. Still, he will do what he loves.
        1. CTEPX
          CTEPX 24 May 2014 16: 32
          +12
          Quote: mamont5
          Retire him and let him sit in social networks

          Medvedev is slowly and surely walking the path of Gorbachev)).
          1. Normal
            Normal 24 May 2014 23: 30
            +6
            Quote: ctepx

            Medvedev is slowly and surely walking the path of Gorbachev))
            .....
            Medvedev. this is Putin's traitor))

            About how!
            Is Medvedev a member of the CPSU?
            Started working as an assistant harvester?
            Was a member of the Politburo?
            Together with a group of comrades introduced prohibition?
            Tried to solve economic problems with the help of intensification and acceleration, and after the failure announced a restructuring?
            Mediocre capitulated and withdrew troops from Europe almost into the open field?
            Consistently betrayed everyone who believed him?
            Tried to destroy the opposition with the wrong hands, having served time during the Emergency Committee in Foros?
            Mediocre pissed off power and country?

            No. No and no!
            Medvedev is a loyal ally of GDP and owes everything to him. He's just a shit for Putin, therefore, in demand.
            It's just that Putin can't seem to be a liberal (although for the Western historians he directly declares: "I am a liberal"), our electorate has other priorities.
            But in order to pursue a truly Putin (liberal) course (and to get cones from the electorate for this), Putin needs Medvedev.
            Needed.
        2. Vladimir.z.
          Vladimir.z. 24 May 2014 16: 57
          +11
          Minus me but Medvedev is Putin’s grave digger ....
          1. CTEPX
            CTEPX 24 May 2014 16: 59
            +5
            Quote: Vladimir.z.
            Minus me but Medvedev is Putin’s grave digger ....

            Cool joke!)) drinks
          2. MREDBEST
            MREDBEST 24 May 2014 17: 21
            +12
            Medvedev evokes mixed feelings in me, he’s not bad either, he’s not good, he says something, but nothing happens :(

            I can say who exactly needs to be driven out of the assistants is Anton Siluanov, this is the person who causes distrust of himself ...
            At the beginning of the year, as soon as the clouds began to gather over Russia, as there was a possibility of a budget deficit, so Antosha sang "We cannot reduce social expenses and responsibilities to the population, we need to pay attention to the budget of the military-defense industry, what kind of bloated it is" Well kapets , eprst, as if there are no other options))) And to reduce the staff of the Ministry of Finance officials, whose work we do not see, such an idea does not occur to him ?!

            Regarding the situation with VISA and MAESTRO, he also recently announced that we would have nowhere without them. Nonsense is complete, we need them only for trips abroad ...

            After such statements, one wonders where Putin is looking.
            1. CTEPX
              CTEPX 24 May 2014 17: 35
              +3
              Quote: MREDBEST
              Medvedev evokes mixed feelings in me

              I clarify, this is my personal opinion)).
              Medvedev. this is Putin's traitor)). And Putin knows that.
              In addition, he (Medvedev) is not respected in the midst ... of political techs ... because of his human qualities.
              I’m saying directly: Medvedev would like to become Gorbachev!))
              1. Turkir
                Turkir 24 May 2014 21: 19
                +3
                Well, just say it directly, then you are a plus. smile
                And not one.
              2. anfil
                anfil 24 May 2014 23: 15
                +1
                Medvedev. this is Putin's traitor)). And Putin knows that.


                It’s good when you know the enemy in person and then you can predict his moves, it’s worse when you betray whom you don’t think, the consequences are harder if, in addition, he was also considered a friend!
          3. w2000
            w2000 24 May 2014 17: 26
            +5
            Yes, they are two boots - a pair. It is naive to think that Medvedev has even a drop of independence in decision-making. Both Putin and Medvedev represent anti-people forces, continuing the work of Gorbachev and Yeltsin to plunder the people of Russia. They are proteges of oligarchs and large industrialists, and will defend the interests of large corporations to the detriment of Russia's social development. Although what kind of social development can be discussed when a third of the population is below the poverty line, half of the regions are on the verge of bankruptcy, education and medicine have become de facto paid, and unemployment is breaking all conceivable records.
          4. gunter_laux
            gunter_laux 24 May 2014 17: 52
            +1
            would get rid of such an executor of presidential orders hi
          5. Stas
            Stas 24 May 2014 18: 59
            +6
            Quote: Vladimir.z.
            Minus me but Medvedev is Putin’s grave digger ....


            So in the power of Serdyukov and Chubais full. Tell me who your friend is and I will tell you who you are. In foreign policy, Putin is well done, but he overwhelms the domestic one, produces bureaucrats of all stripes, brings millions of gastrobayters, supports oligarchs and Serdyukov. This is a huge minus to him.
            1. alone
              alone 24 May 2014 22: 40
              +2
              Quote: Stas
              So in the power of Serdyukov and Chubais full. Tell me who your friend is and I will tell you who you are. In foreign policy, Putin is well done, but he overwhelms the domestic one, produces bureaucrats of all stripes, brings millions of gastrobayters, supports oligarchs and Serdyukov. This is a huge minus to him.

              )) Of course, I apologize, but you are a naive person. A strong foreign policy always relies on a strong domestic policy. You can’t be good at foreign and at the same time unsatisfactory in domestic politics. This is absurd, Stanislav.
              1. Stas
                Stas 25 May 2014 16: 11
                0
                Quote: lonely
                Of course, I apologize, but you are a naive person. A strong foreign policy always relies on a strong domestic policy. You can’t be good at foreign and at the same time unsatisfactory in domestic politics. This is absurd, Stanislav.

                He was naive when about 8-10 years ago he suffered from maximalism and believed in justice, law and so on. I have been ill with this for a long time, now I try to evaluate events more restraintly without excesses and extremes. I did not quite understand what you wanted to say. I am not a supporter of GDP as a whole, this can easily be checked by my comments. But I can easily refute your idea that one cannot be well done in foreign and bad in domestic politics. 1. To begin with, I think that domestic policy in Russia is bad, but for example you consider it excellent !!! It follows that you have a wonderful foreign and domestic policy of Russia.
                2. You can also decompose exactly the opposite, and someone will say about the failed policy, both internal and external.
                3. I try to judge everything by actions, I did a good deed - well done, shit - z.a.s.r.a.n.e.ts. There are no saints on earth, everyone is mistaken, the question is how often.
      2. maskwich
        maskwich 24 May 2014 14: 47
        +7
        Quote: Vadivak
        Does a university student mean any pity?

        It's a pity of course, but he will not work as a night watchman ... wassat
        I rethought taking into account your opinion, I think he should be appointed rector of RUDN University, let foreign students suffer repeat
      3. Dimy4
        Dimy4 24 May 2014 14: 50
        +4
        And the current students are soooo that rectors are sorry. wink
      4. Little Muck
        Little Muck 24 May 2014 14: 50
        +17
        The economic policy of the government is atavism, not even appendicitis, but the tail. Under current conditions, the whole economic concept is atavism, although of course you can walk with your tail: a small one sticking out of your pants from behind, I emphasize, from behind.
        Already wrote earlier. Putin will not give up Medvedev, but appoint him with the team the head of the reindeer breeding teamwould be worth it yesterday. This is also my personal opinion, similar to the author of the article.
      5. ZU-23
        ZU-23 24 May 2014 14: 56
        -6
        What Leontiev says to me on the drum is that he does not follow the bazaar more than Medvedev, or he also attacked him like a fifth column, Medvedev is not stupid anyway and there are no options for him in his place, except for liberals.
        1. Vorodis_vA
          Vorodis_vA 24 May 2014 18: 01
          +3
          he is a liberoal and does not hide it ... grandmother can do better
          1. Turkir
            Turkir 24 May 2014 21: 21
            0
            His grandmother? Any, just not him .. wink
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. Sterlya
        Sterlya 24 May 2014 22: 21
        +1
        For me personally, Medvedev at the post is a mystery. So, not fish, not meat. Probably only GDP knows the reason for this phenomenon.
    2. VNP1958PVN
      VNP1958PVN 24 May 2014 14: 52
      +9
      Ambassador to Ukraine! There is still no one listening to the ambassador! You look with fear and wake up thinking!
    3. Anton-sed
      Anton-sed 24 May 2014 15: 06
      +1
      Do not forget, this is Russia. Our government does not change so fast
    4. Sibiryak1303
      Sibiryak1303 24 May 2014 15: 46
      +1
      preferably abroad good
      1. alone
        alone 24 May 2014 16: 27
        +3
        It’s interesting to read Leontiev’s articles! Either he is a military strategist, then a security specialist, or a journalist, or an economist! He recalls a brilliant locksmith who taught everyone everything
        1. Grbear
          Grbear 24 May 2014 16: 46
          -1
          capacitor positive (+) lead
          I agree. He is very "broadband" fellow ... And so, the "kitchen" prophet, it is not known why in the civil service (well, he apologized repeat ).
          1. APASUS
            APASUS 24 May 2014 17: 21
            +6
            Quote: GrBear
            I agree. It is very "broadband". And so, "kitchen" prophet, it is not known why in the civil service

            And what did he actually say?
            That Medvedev does not understand the economy, for this two years already was enough for me! That we do not have a normal economic program or that we are dependent on the dollar, said nothing special.
            Kudrin left the government (he will be 3 years in September) and his business lives and thrives. We all look back to the West and expect him to catch up, and if it weren’t for the Crimea, we would still drive money to the USA !!!
            Dimon would have a blog in LJ and I think a bunch of offices paid him for it, it would be good for everyone, and not a lawyer should be involved in the economy!
            1. Gloria45
              Gloria45 24 May 2014 17: 32
              +1
              “ORANGE CHILDREN OF THE THIRD REICH”, a film by Mikhail Leontyev and Veronika Krasheninnikova,
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Intensive
        Intensive 24 May 2014 19: 17
        +1
        yeah to Israel)
  2. saag
    saag 24 May 2014 14: 34
    +5
    no, they will not dissolve, this question is not raised for the first time and the answer has not been given for the first time. that the government is working well and that we have to work with what is, etc., it’s such a rusty flip side of a gold medal
  3. VadimL
    VadimL 24 May 2014 14: 42
    +5
    Well, I don’t know about the dismissal, but I need to kick the ass so that they work faster. And then all the activity of rule is reduced to the principle of non-interference in the economy.
    1. Stas
      Stas 24 May 2014 19: 17
      +5
      If they had not intervened, then it would have been normal. And on the contrary they put sticks in wheels. A vivid example of a small business. From December 2012 to 2013, only more than 500000 private individuals were covered up, and these are people who did not beg for anything from the state, earned a penny for themselves, paid taxes and requisitions properly). Officials decided to raise their retirement fees 2 times from 18 to 36 tr (Novosib), as a result, private traders closed, people kicked someone out onto the street, someone on the stock exchange, and the budget got a good hole. My wife also closed 2 food service stalls, there is a lot of fuss, and the exhaust is a penny. Now the Asians have turned around well here, do not pay taxes, work in black, fictitious propiska, wrapped chebureks on their knees.
  4. Andrey82
    Andrey82 24 May 2014 14: 44
    +11
    The question is that no one in the government bears any responsibility for anything (Serdyukov and his "reforms". Disruption of defense orders, as an example - Bulava, refusing to fly normally. Skolkovo, which gobbled up tens of billions of rubles and is still unknown why? liberalization with privatization of enterprises). In general, bail, clannishness and, apparently, hopes for a spare airfield outside Russia, when everything finally starts to collapse (a matter of time and oil money will not help), they might ask for nanoreforms and privatization.
  5. Cherdak
    Cherdak 24 May 2014 14: 44
    +15
    LADA urgently needs to be appointed Life President of the World Organization of the most advanced iPhone users!
    And he will definitely be in his place smile
    1. Andrey from Tver
      Andrey from Tver 24 May 2014 17: 27
      +2
      Quote: Cherdak
      LADA urgently needs to be appointed Life President of the World Organization of the most advanced iPhone users!
    2. Turkir
      Turkir 24 May 2014 21: 25
      +1
      I am also against the iPhone, let them stop working. Medvedev will cope.
  6. Giant thought
    Giant thought 24 May 2014 14: 46
    +9
    The economic policy of the Medvedev government is a road to nowhere, which will ultimately lead to the collapse of our entire economy. The liberal doctrine in economics has become obsolete in our country. And Medvedev was not given the chance to be the head of the government due to his lack of natural leader data. Remember when Putin was prime minister, what macroeconomic indicators Russia had were several times better than Medvedev, although the peak of the global crisis fell during this period.
  7. Luga
    Luga 24 May 2014 14: 46
    +3
    Misha speaks about politics clearly and simply. About economics - I understood only the word "atavism" in the sense of "not using indecent words". Maybe someone from the members of the forum will translate me into normal Russian what the person wanted to say? smile
    1. KazaK Bo
      KazaK Bo 24 May 2014 15: 24
      +14
      Maybe someone from the members of the forum will translate to me in normal Russian what the person wanted to say?

      You, alas, are not alone in your misunderstanding of the essence of the article ... I also do not understand how you can slander on page A4 and say nothing ... Just like the "hero" himself - Prime Minister D. Medvedev (behind his verbiage very little thought, specifics, suggestions!) ...
      After all, the government of D. Medvedev, like his policy during the presidency, is nothing but a PREMIUM POLICY! Everyone perfectly understands that the VECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT is in those power structures that D. Medvedev headed or leads ... one is to INCREASE TAX LOADS ON PEOPLE, PAYMENTS AND HOUSING RATES, PRICES FOR TRAVELS (and this is usually 95% of hard workers and pensioners). .. TO PRIVATIZE EVERYTHING THAT CREATED BY THE FORCES OF MILLIONS OF RUSSIAN CITIZENS AND GIVING FOR PENALITIES TO NORWAYS (5-7% of the population of the country) ... EXEMPTION FROM AND WITHOUT SUCH ARE NOT SUCH GREAT TAXES FROM CUSTOMS CLEARANCE, CLEAR ... etc.
      THOSE. - from a simple hard worker, a small entrepreneur, they squeezed all the juices ... practically without doing anything for an economic leap forward ... Everything that was built is either the backlog of the USSR or the beginning ... the mid-2000s ... but not at all times liberalism of Mr. Medvedev. We already had such a period - the EPOCH OF KINDERSURPRISE (the second half of Yeltsin's power) ... It ended with a Default ... no matter how it happened again ... Where has it been seen that the PRESIDENT instead of the prime minister would start holding meetings on economic development .. . to straighten the "bends" of the Government.
      Therefore, D. Medvedev should shake hands as soon as possible ... to thank for the contribution made (as it is now being done!) For the collapse, to hand over the Certificate and send to write memoirs without the right to occupy any government posts or work in commercial structures ... pay only pension after reaching 60 years ... do not be afraid ... he will not die of hunger!
      1. Signaller
        Signaller 24 May 2014 16: 30
        +1
        That's right, His task is to "squeeze" the people, no more.
      2. Luga
        Luga 24 May 2014 17: 23
        +2
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        After all, the government of D. Medvedev, like his policy during the presidency, is nothing but a PREMIUM POLICY!

        A typical bourgeois policy of a model not even of the past, but of the century before last. I agree with your comment.
        But why exactly this I had to understand from the words of Leontyev I did not realize smile
        Regarding Medvedev, the president needs a prime minister, who, pursuing his policy, would take on all the bumps. Nobody loves him, so he is dependent on the president.
        And the policy is determined by the president himself. The most bourgeois and predatory reform - the monetization of benefits - was being prepared when Medvedev was not yet in the government. So, our president himself is still a "bourgeois" smile
        I do not perceive Medvedev as an independent figure. It seems to me that he is simply a conductor of certain, not the most popular ideas of the president, a sort of lightning rod. Maybe I'm wrong. smile
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 24 May 2014 15: 43
      +2
      Quote: Luga
      Misha speaks about politics clearly and simply.

      I agree. This article is about nothing. Something I wanted to say, but not / before / said. I wanted to convey something to the reader, but I did not understand anything.
      1. andj61
        andj61 24 May 2014 15: 55
        +4
        Quote: MainBeam
        This article is about nothing. Something I wanted to say, but not / before / said. I wanted to convey something to the reader, but I did not understand anything


        The entire extract from the article can be put in one phrase:
        So, in the scenarios described by Medvedev there is no development.

        And we do not just need development, we need industry growth, the speediest rearmament of the army, the development of science and knowledge-intensive industries, but not (God forbid!) Skolkovo.
        Medvedev needs to be removed urgently! The government needs specialists. The time of only "friends" has already passed And since Putin does not abandon his own people, then let them move to warm places in the reign of oligarchic monopolies - for the country it will be cheaper.
    4. dmitriygorshkov
      dmitriygorshkov 24 May 2014 16: 43
      +3
      Quote: Luga
      . Maybe someone from the members of the forum will translate to me in normal Russian what the person wanted to say?

      And I was scared that I alone did not catch a woodpecker depth!
      Glory to those Lord, it looks like at least two of us!
      With a bunch of reservations, so as not to cast a shadow on anyone ... I really thought I would hear a revelation! And I heard the nickname Double! With all due respect to Leontiev, something unfortunate happened belay
  8. Bobxnumx
    Bobxnumx 24 May 2014 14: 48
    +5
    If you look at the work of the government, then we will push around on the spot. Development is at zero, if not in the red.
    1. ehomenkov
      ehomenkov 24 May 2014 16: 56
      +2
      Yeah - people are ungrateful ... Putin is politicizing - and everything in the economy is on the shoulders of Medvedev and his cabinet ... The president acts in any negotiations as a GUARANTEE for the decisions of his government ... And Medvedev has a team - God forbid everyone - and he the economist does not advertise from him (God) ...
  9. Alll1
    Alll1 24 May 2014 14: 49
    -1
    This "personal" opinion on Channel One is encouraging. good
  10. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 24 May 2014 14: 49
    +2
    Before the events that are brewing, the government together with the Prime Minister to resign. There will be no Medvedev, there will be no Chubais and the like.
    1. Andrey82
      Andrey82 24 May 2014 14: 58
      +8
      They are not only in government. They (liberalists) - at the head of banks, universities, all sorts of cunning funds, etc. In general, the country is entangled in bloodsuckers, like a cobweb. It must be torn, burned, otherwise the country of the khan. There is no more time, as well as much hope for Putin.
      1. via75
        via75 24 May 2014 15: 20
        0
        that you are very zealous to "tear" "burn". Easy to break, difficult to build. And we have already passed this. Let's not step on the same rake. And the country will have a khan if you act according to your scenario.
        Want changes, please, who is in the way. Now there are many opportunities if desired. To address to deputies of the area, city with constructive offers. etc. Here rallies and slogans are a waste of time and the road to nowhere.
        1. Andrey82
          Andrey82 24 May 2014 16: 27
          +3
          Quote: via75
          Here rallies and slogans are a waste of time and the road to nowhere

          I only partially agree. An example of an independent confirmation of this, as well as the 91st year. But if the liberals continue to dominate the country's economy and determine its direction, then new rallies and slogans are inevitable. I think Western "partners" will try to organize something like the Maidan. For this, for example, a shortage of food is just suitable (unexpectedly, but this was the case in 17 and 91) or a large-scale economic crisis. And how do you clash on the nat. soil? In general, a bunch of options. And due to the penetration of liberals into all spheres of the country's life, the Maidan in Moscow does not look fantastic. There is no more time.
          1. via75
            via75 24 May 2014 17: 22
            -2
            Western partners are already working in this direction (wrote a little lower)

            just read http://www.ridus.ru/news/160730
            . The US Congress is preparing to pass a law that will ensure uninterrupted financing of "democratization of the Russian Federation." Experts believe that the goal of the program is to repeat the “Kiev scenario” already in Moscow.

            this is the main reason why you can’t talk about the removal of Medvedev. The Cabinet of Ministers is currently a more or less united team.
            On average, yes. (my opinion), but it’s definitely not worth making replacements starting with Medvedev. Maybe it’s better to clean up on the ground
            1. Saratoga833
              Saratoga833 24 May 2014 18: 20
              +2
              The fish rots from the head, so you need to start not with the tail, as suggested by "via75", but with the head. Where the head directs, everything else will turn there. If an incompetent manager is at the head of the cabinet of ministers, then "... a more or less close-knit team" will amicably lead us to the edge.
  11. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 24 May 2014 14: 54
    +2
    However, Leontyev did not say that all this has long been described in the article "One Step Forward, Two Steps Back"
  12. Lukerya Weaver
    Lukerya Weaver 24 May 2014 14: 57
    +3
    Listen, I'm not in the know, but can the Duma help the government resign? I read here that the Duma is considering self-dissolution and the elections in September. It seems like this goal pursues. Again, they write that the GDP has already twice proposed to Medvedev to resign, but he didn’t.
  13. mig31
    mig31 24 May 2014 14: 58
    0
    In economics, the tail will grow anyway, natural selection ...
  14. felix34
    felix34 24 May 2014 15: 05
    +2
    The abundance of lawyers in the country's leadership does not save us from ambiguous and "leaky" laws for corrupt officials, and even more from weak-willed and half-hearted decisions on the development of the Russian economy. Unfortunately, this is becoming more and more apparent. And the time was and still m. B. left for decisive action. The people can still be patient, if necessary. There would be action!
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 24 May 2014 18: 31
      +2
      In my opinion, the country's leadership should not have an abundance of lawyers, but economists. It would be more useful.
  15. ochakow703
    ochakow703 24 May 2014 15: 05
    0
    Really mediocre leadership. In general, this bunch, Putin - Medvedev, was immediately doomed to one-sidedness. Medvedev is completely incompatible with active Putin, and it is time to peacefully break these friendly ties for the good of the cause. Medvedev has Skolkovo, so let him play with iPhones. The prime minister must be punchy and active, like a battering ram, like Shoigu.
    1. creak
      creak 24 May 2014 16: 25
      +4
      Quote: ochakow703
      . Medvedev has Skolkovo, so let him play with iPhones.


      These Medvedev's amusements have already cost several tens of billions ... Suggest continuing these games - and at whose expense will the continuation of the banquet be?
  16. jktu66
    jktu66 24 May 2014 15: 08
    +2
    The economic bloc is in sharp contradiction with my idea of ​​what the Russian economy needs.
    And with mine too
  17. kodxnumx
    kodxnumx 24 May 2014 15: 11
    -3
    Medvedev has nothing to do with Vladimir Vladimirovich, another weight category, I think, for the global restructuring of the economy, and in order for all orders to be executed and not to dynamize them, you need to adequately change this advanced person, yet he adequately served the president’s term when he was entrusted with GDP to him , although not without nuances! Strong people are needed in difficult times for Russia.
    1. Nekarmadlen
      Nekarmadlen 24 May 2014 18: 19
      +5
      Quote: kod3001
      Medvedev has nothing to do with Vladimir Vladimirovich, another weight category, I think, for the global restructuring of the economy, and in order for all orders to be executed and not to dynamize them, you need to adequately change this advanced person, yet he adequately served the president’s term when he was entrusted with GDP to him , although not without nuances! Strong people are needed in difficult times for Russia.

      Lord, hearty, where did you study Russian?
  18. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 24 May 2014 15: 12
    0
    Leontyev, as always, is accurate and concise in formulations and conclusions ...
    And the conclusions are not at all joyful.
  19. via75
    via75 24 May 2014 15: 13
    -1
    just read http://www.ridus.ru/news/160730
    . The US Congress is preparing to pass a law that will ensure uninterrupted financing of "democratization of the Russian Federation." Experts believe that the goal of the program is to repeat the “Kiev scenario” already in Moscow.


    this is the main reason why you can’t talk about the removal of Medvedev. The Cabinet of Ministers is currently a more or less united team.
    On average, yes. (my opinion), but it’s definitely not worth making replacements starting with Medvedev. Maybe it’s better to clean up on the ground
  20. afecn
    afecn 24 May 2014 15: 32
    +1
    in fact, Leontiev did not really say anything: I do not like it, but I will not comment on anything.
    Why write at all. To pinch the one who does not like once again? Just think, the prophet ... How many of them we have. They talk, but put the criticized in their places, I think they themselves will not do anything better. It is easier to criticize, especially now, when you do not know what will happen tomorrow (from the external environment)
    1. Demon0n
      Demon0n 24 May 2014 18: 30
      0
      Quote: afecn
      in fact, Leontiev did not really say anything: I do not like it, but I will not comment on anything.
      Why write at all. To pinch the one who does not like once again? Just think, the prophet ... How many of them we have. They talk, but put the criticized in their places, I think they themselves will not do anything better. It is easier to criticize, especially now, when you do not know what will happen tomorrow (from the external environment)

      Very much even "you know". However, this does not solve the problem.
      The solution to the problem and the problem, as such, (more precisely, there are many) lies in a different plane, namely, in the internal one and refers to the resources (and YOU yourself have almost identified this problem ... you just need to go a little further ...). There are other problems.
  21. Akvadra
    Akvadra 24 May 2014 15: 33
    +2
    Sometimes one gets the impression that this prime minister and the entire cabinet are somewhere on the moon. Problems are solved by some unearthly. In addition to declarations like "we must" or "we need" (otherwise we do not know), and amusing laws on time zones, etc., there are no significant steps and actions. Some lunatics. Has the Russian land become impoverished by smart, talented, business-like patriots !? Hardly .
  22. Palladium900
    Palladium900 24 May 2014 15: 40
    +4
    We inherited the financial, liberal policy of our government from the troubled times of privatization and the writing of the Russian constitution. It is focused on "pegging" (dependence) on the US dollar, which means it is colonial in relation to Russia! It needs to be changed ..
  23. Oprychnik
    Oprychnik 24 May 2014 15: 45
    -2
    I'm about Leontief himself. Do not understand the economy - do not try to make an assessment with links to
    "unknown experts". And such statements from an incompetent person are just nonsense!
    1. andj61
      andj61 24 May 2014 16: 01
      +1
      Leontiev is just a competent person. From Wiki:
      ... M. Leontyev was born on October 12, 1958 in Moscow. Father - aircraft engineer Vladimir Yakovlevich Leontyev, mother - professor of statistics at the Moscow Institute of National Economy named after Plekhanova, co-author of the textbook "Trade Statistics" Mira Moiseevna Leontyeva.
      He studied at the general economic faculty of the Moscow Institute of National Economy. Plekhanov, who graduated in 1979 with a degree in labor economics.
      1. Oprychnik
        Oprychnik 24 May 2014 16: 13
        +1
        “Now I hear that we will switch to our own payment system, to pay for energy resources for rubles, then it’s not for me to protest against this. But when I hear this question from the lips of people who are conceptually sure that these measures will lead to death, then comment nothing to me."

        How do you rate this statement?
      2. Oprychnik
        Oprychnik 24 May 2014 16: 27
        +1
        I understood everything ... In short, from the nomenclature elite ...
    2. Oprychnik
      Oprychnik 24 May 2014 16: 17
      0
      Who did he consult with Kasparov? If with Kudrin I can still understand. This is a specialist.
      1. saag
        saag 24 May 2014 16: 35
        +1
        Quote: Oprychnik
        Who did he consult with Kasparov?

        He just lives on his own head, which is what I wish for you, and not wait until they say something to you, because they can deceive you :-)
        1. Oprychnik
          Oprychnik 24 May 2014 16: 42
          +1
          Nonsense! Good gentleman! I just express my point of view! And you stupidly agree with the opinion of the "expert"!
      2. CTEPX
        CTEPX 24 May 2014 16: 39
        +2
        Quote: Oprychnik
        If with Kudrin I can still understand. This is a specialist.

        Kudrin is a sales specialist)). Not an engineer, in short)).
        1. Oprychnik
          Oprychnik 24 May 2014 16: 47
          +4
          "Mother is a teacher of statistics at the Plekhanov Moscow Institute of National Economy, co-author of the textbook" Trade Statistics "Mira Moiseevna Leontyeva."

          What, from the mother of knowledge picked up?)))
          1. Oprychnik
            Oprychnik 24 May 2014 20: 13
            +1
            And he studied at the Moscow Institute of National Economy. Plekhanova, where my mother, Mira Moiseevna Leontyeva, was a teacher. When I was a student myself, I know how these children studied, passed tests and exams.
    3. ehomenkov
      ehomenkov 24 May 2014 16: 49
      +3
      For a long time I have not believed Leontyev - a slippery type .. And he always wags like a dog's tail ... Look, he will soon be praising the "consistent steps of the government" - either he gets it, or it will be awkward to write against the wind ...
  24. Velesovich
    Velesovich 24 May 2014 15: 59
    +4
    Economic policy? Build production! Real economy! All these virtual gestures and schemes, when the Moscow office plankton with their VKontakte seats from 9 to 17 "creates" more for the country than hard workers in factories - are doomed to death. Until all the destroyed branches of industry and science are rebuilt, there can be no talk of any economy. So we will be glad that the Chinese allowed to build the pipe.
  25. 1536
    1536 24 May 2014 16: 03
    +2
    In the same way, Comrade. Gorbachev.
  26. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 24 May 2014 16: 03
    0
    Everything is not so clear, Mr. Leontyev. Take the same Russian payment systems in order to abandon foreign ones. Yes, there are none yet and they will appear somewhere in six months. Still how are you planning a message from abroad with banks? It is not clear what kind of intermediate links are needed, banks that foreigners and we in Russia would trust. So no need to roll the wave. Maybe somewhere Medvedev is still not catching up with something, but Putin is there to correct him.
    1. saag
      saag 24 May 2014 16: 37
      +1
      Quote: Anchonsha
      Yes, there are none yet and they will appear somewhere in six months.

      What are you saying? Take the same Sberbank. It has a payment system that operates nationwide.
  27. konvalval
    konvalval 24 May 2014 16: 06
    +1
    Quote: maskwitch
    It’s time for Medvedev to send an honorary resignation by the rector of some university, from him there is nothing besides harm to Russia. IMHO hi

    Only not financial and economic, otherwise he will teach mom not to grieve.
  28. uzer 13
    uzer 13 24 May 2014 16: 08
    +6
    It seems that Medvedev is not so much working as covering some dark affairs that are being dragged through SovMin. Industry is abandoned, all efforts are concentrated on currency speculation, the Central Bank has turned into an instrument of criminal fraud, and the ministries are working together to develop plans to rob the people .
  29. konvalval
    konvalval 24 May 2014 16: 19
    0
    Quote: Weaker Lukerya
    Listen, I'm not in the know, but can the Duma help the government resign? I read here that the Duma is considering self-dissolution and the elections in September. It seems like this goal pursues. Again, they write that the GDP has already twice proposed to Medvedev to resign, but he didn’t.

    Where does the data come from?
    1. ehomenkov
      ehomenkov 24 May 2014 16: 41
      0
      by mistake minus - I also agree - infa from OBS ...
  30. Signaller
    Signaller 24 May 2014 16: 23
    0
    Anyone, especially the head of the family, is trying to grow. Raise a family, raise children. it’s better to buy a car, to repair an apartment, to equip a summer house. This is considered as twice two. And here the resources of the sea. Scientific thought does not comprehend how much. And the result ???? Zero. And he is zero in Africa and zero. So we think whether that person sits at this place. The lord of time, and the real zero ruler. I am in his place, though not a very advanced person. and then I would do more, with such grandmas then.
  31. ehomenkov
    ehomenkov 24 May 2014 16: 38
    -6
    MEDVEDEV PRIME - GOD GOD TO EVERYONE ... A PRESENT OPINION ABOUT IT IS FORMED BY SUCH "ECONOMISTS", like the author, they have their own categorical opinion about everything and impose their verbiage on others ...
  32. Vadim12
    Vadim12 24 May 2014 17: 15
    +1
    No wonder he was nicknamed iPhone. Let the information war better be conducted on the Internet, if it does not cope with the government.
  33. sv68
    sv68 24 May 2014 17: 47
    +2
    Medvedev is better at doing such things where you don’t have to make decisions. Type water into the holey barrel with buckets of water. And it seems like it works, and there’s no sense
  34. Palych9999
    Palych9999 24 May 2014 18: 02
    +3
    Not verbose ...
    And just as not "smart" ...
  35. Indifferent
    Indifferent 24 May 2014 18: 05
    0
    If Leontyev does not want to comment on the dissolution of the "Timurovites" in our government, then they will not be dismissed! And this means the atavism will continue and the short tail of our economy will grow, turning into a long tail that wraps around the neck. What, in fact, Timurites need! It's not for nothing that they sit there and pull us with all their might into American colonialism.
  36. Demon0n
    Demon0n 24 May 2014 18: 05
    +1
    Well, everything is great, and now I invite everyone (including Leontiev, who has a habit of expressing himself in the "obvious to incredible" format) to answer the questions:
    1) What is the "resource of power" (the resource required to "exercise power") in the capitalist system?
    2) Who owns the real power?
    The remaining questions, I think will become apparent after the first 2.
  37. konvalval
    konvalval 24 May 2014 18: 08
    +1
    Quote: ehomenkov
    by mistake minus - I also agree - infa from OBS ...

    We should be more attentive.
  38. Intensive
    Intensive 24 May 2014 19: 34
    +1
    Apparently, the government adheres to a policy of zero economic growth. And they do just so much so as not to cause a coup d'etat. It seems that the world behind the scenes for Russia, as a specialization, has been assigned the role of a raw material power. Everything else: science, morality, defense, should slowly fade away. But Medvedev is a consequence, not a cause. They will take DAM away for the layman, there will be hope for the best, but it is unlikely to be better until the oligarchs conduct the casting.
  39. marat63
    marat63 25 May 2014 00: 31
    0
    my boss looks like him, a rosy-cheeked boy dreaming of running up the career ladder, there’s no benefit from him, but he’ll make a fuss that everyone is clutching his head, and he became the boss at the expense of an intelligent friend whom he set up ....