Ten reasons to hate the form of Yudashkin

16


The soldiers listed Rosbalt with ten reasons why the Russian “Yudashkin” field uniform was hated by the Russian army. The command of the army sees no cause for concern.

The form “from Yudashkin” is not as bad as it is said about it, it is just the wrong way to wear it. About this at a press conference in St. Petersburg, said the commander of the Western Military District, Colonel-General Arkady Bakhin. Reporter "Rosbalt" talked with the soldiers who are now forced to wear this uniform, and summarized the claims to it.

Claim # 1. The material from which the “Yudashkin form” is made is less dense and less durable than that used in the form of the old sample. The paint also keeps on it a lot worse. Therefore, soldiers complain that the new fabric breaks more often and fades much more quickly after washing.

“There is an opportunity to compare, because we are now wearing both versions of the form. So, the new one has already faded and has torn, and the old one is keeping up with dignity, ”the soldiers say.

Claim # 2. The seams of the new form are disgustingly fulfilled - they crawl away wherever there is even the slightest tension, i.e. on pockets, armpits, etc. Most likely, this is due to the poor quality of the threads that were used when sewing the form.

“Once a week, it is necessary to hem the stitches, otherwise the form will crawl completely,” soldiers complain.

Claim # 3. In the new form for fixing pockets and epaulettes velcro are used. These velcro were of extremely poor quality - wool, for which velcro hooks cling, splits and spreads, as a result, the velcro ceases to hold.

“We have to sew epaulets with thread, and sew buttons on the pockets in order to preserve their contents,” the soldiers explained to Rosbalt.

Claim # 4. Buttons that are used in the new form are defective - their internal lintels are made with sharp edges that fray the threads. As a result, where buttons are often used, for example, on jackets, they fly off in a couple of weeks and have to be sewn again.

“We have to constantly sew on buttons, but they again and again fray the threads with which they are sewn. It was necessary to think of it, sew such stupid buttons on an army uniform! ”, The soldiers are indignant.

Claim # 5. In the new form, indeed, it is very cold, even in a pea jacket. The reason is that in the old form a high fur collar was used, which, when cooling and wind, the soldiers raised up. In the new form, the collar is very short and does not even cover the neck, so the soldiers freeze in the cold and in the wind.

“The new form is suitable for cold weather until late autumn, it protects from rain, there is a hood. But in the frost over 15 degrees it is useless - you freeze it very quickly, ”the soldiers explained.

Claim # 6. “Bertsy”, high lace-up boots, are nice and comfortable, but not in winter. In winter, the feet in them are very cold and at the same time soak from sweat.

“Those who have the opportunity to wear boots with footcloths, wear them in winter, because the boots are warmer and more comfortable. Bertsy thin, and even with a winter insole freeze through instantly, “- said the soldiers.

Claim # 7. Trouser pockets in the new form are located on the hips. This is probably beautiful, but in the army it turned out to be non-functional.

“We recently participated in exercises. So, it cost us once in the field to crawl in their bellies like all thigh pockets just fell off, ”the soldiers complained.

Claim # 8. In the new form, shoulder straps are not located on the shoulders, as before, but in front, on the chest and forearm, according to the pattern adopted by NATO.

“We don’t know how to join NATO, and we have embarrassments as a result - it’s impossible to identify from the back, a soldier in front of you or an officer, no insignia. This is very inconvenient, ”the soldiers explained.

Claim # 9. The army charter assumes uniform wearing of a form, however for the form from Yudashkin the decision is still not found how to wear a trouser belt and a single-breasted coat. In some parts, the belt is worn over a pea coat, in others they are hung on trousers. The reason is that the jacket from Yudashkin does not involve the use of a belt, but according to the old Statutes, the belt should still be fastened from the top. In addition, it is surprising that in the new form the tunic has to be refilled in trousers.

“In our part, the belt is worn under a jacket, and the jacket is not charged, but when we come to other parts, for example, to the teachings, we have to do it as it is accepted there. But in the army everything should be according to the Charter, and not according to the concepts, ”the soldiers are surprised.

Claim # 10. The latest claim is price. According to various sources, the cost of a new form exceeds the cost of the old one by three to four times. The army leadership explains the high cost of the new form by “the use of advanced technologies, the latest materials and progressive design and technical solutions by manufacturers”, as well as the cost of services renowned fashion designers.

On the eve of Defender of Fatherland Day, all the participants of the “new army uniform” project - producers of crappy threads, suppliers of low-quality accessories and a separate eminent couturier were asked to convey ardent greetings and various wishes that we will not give here for censorship reasons.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    24 May 2011 13: 49

    Claim number 10. The most recent claim relates to price. According to various sources, the cost of the new form exceeds the cost of the old one by three to four times. The army leadership explains the high cost of the new form “using manufacturers of advanced technologies, the latest materials and advanced design and technical solutions”, as well as the cost of the services of the famous couturier ------------- the conceived form and that the output is 2 BIG DIFFERENCES. effective managers in action. everything that can be optimized along the chain.
  2. Stavr
    Stavr
    +5
    24 May 2011 14: 10
    Yudashkin, along with Taburetkin, would be dressed in this uniform and on the bunk ... let them be there among the prisoners and PR.
    1. 0
      2 December 2017 18: 41
      You’re talking a little thing. KS2000.)
  3. cabin boy
    +2
    24 May 2011 20: 57
    The first four reasons have nothing to do with Yudashkin, it is the fault of the enterprise on which they sewed the uniform, and the military representative sits at each such enterprise, the minister is certainly always to blame for everything, but the system is rotten.
    1. 0
      25 September 2018 13: 48
      I missed something on the campaign! The system is that someone ruled? I thought only users and expanded!
  4. His
    0
    24 May 2011 22: 11
    The vaunted new army
  5. esso
    +5
    24 May 2011 23: 42
    Yudashkin had nothing to do with it. He did not create a form as a consultant, only. Low quality is explained by stealing the budget. In short, the form is made of cheap materials, and not of those that were conceived. In designing the form, it has a lot of errors based on NATO samples. NATO soldiers our form would have frozen for a long time.
  6. iulai
    +5
    25 September 2011 18: 28
    Yudashkin sewed women's panties all his life, becoming the stylist of the president’s wife, he immediately received a profitable order. corruption has affected the president’s family! I wonder how he fights against corruption in the family ?????
  7. +1
    30 November 2017 15: 29
    as always the extreme is to blame! The last one was Yudashkin, for some reason. And, who came up with all this and cranked it up - white and fluffy. On which member it was necessary to change the form, and even more so to vomit something on the NATO members. What kind of scum came up with all this? this is direct wrecking! we changed the school curriculum with an eye to the West — now we have repentant boys, changed their uniforms — so that during the fighting our guys would be dressed in the nude style and conquer the NATO gay army without a fight?
  8. 0
    30 November 2017 21: 11
    Yudashkin did only one good thing, "men's underpants," as if to say the rest for milder crap.
  9. 0
    2 December 2017 18: 42
    And the glamorous Yudashashchkin served in the Army in general. And by whom? rather no, he's glamorous ... hahahaaa ... KS2000
    1. 0
      6 November 2018 13: 29
      a friend I recently came from the army, though he served in Moscow, and to my question, how did I say the new form, the normal form
  10. 0
    4 December 2017 15: 23
    Have you seen earflaps? How ridiculous clowns
  11. +1
    5 December 2017 02: 19
    Wore both clothing options. Pixel cold, summer, winter. It does not breathe, and is not suitable for any work. Kill refueling top summer pants! For this reason, wore only when building on the parade ground. All the disadvantages of the new form indicated in the article confirm. The old one is generally excellent - comfortable, a pea coat is warm - those who walked in pixel pea jackets were envious. Worn everywhere. There are no cons at all. Most demobilization parades were made from the old form. For this reason, by the end of my service, the old form in good condition did not remain in the unit at all.
  12. 0
    6 August 2018 22: 45
    the form was invented by this ... as his ... "couturier" for these ... as their ... "passive homosexuals", like everything he invented. And since they are not being taken into the army, the uniform did not fit. And Yudashkin has nothing to do with it :-)! What stupid person allowed these ... how them ... to army ammunition !? Previously, the research institutes calculated each seam on the form, which is why it was almost eternal and suitable for everything, at least in battle, at least in the country. And these ... like them ...! I have no words!
  13. 0
    6 November 2018 13: 27
    9 out of 10 to Yudashkin, what are the claims? Well, they crossed the pockets on their side and that's it. And the rest he designed according to the wishes and requirements of the military. Washing, cutting, etc., that's the result of the trash that the soldiers wear

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"