The editor in chief of The New York Times was fired for reporting from Slavyansk

121
According to the "Reedus"Jill Abramson, editor-in-chief of The New York Times, has lost her position because of excessive autonomy and refusal to comply with "corporate standards". According to local media, the owners of the publication decided to replace it with the former Los Angeles Times editor Dean Beckett in connection with the publication of a report from Slavyansk on May 3.

In particular, in a published article, journalists reported that there were no citizens of the Russian Federation in the pro-Russian militia, noting that for the most part it consists of local residents, some of whom had previously served in the Ukrainian and Soviet armies. This is one of the few reports that presented an "alternative point of view," which caused criticism from representatives of the US State Department.

It is worth noting that Jill Abramson has a reputation as a stubborn and aggressive leader. She often made policy decisions that contradicted the opinion of New York Times CEO Mark Thompson.

“Abramson made voluntaristic decisions without consulting with colleagues and not wanting to build productive relations with me. In the end, I came to the conclusion that she had completely lost the support of her colleagues, ”said publisher of The New York Times Arthur Sulzberger Jr. in an interview on one of the TV channels.
  • http://www.ridus.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

121 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +99
    20 May 2014 11: 06
    Freedom of speech in the State Department ...
    1. +42
      20 May 2014 11: 16
      As early as 1789, the US Congress, under pressure from public opinion and democratic legislators in the states, adopted the Bill of Rights - the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, which proclaimed the political, personal and procedural rights of citizens. The first amendment declared the main achievement of a democratic society - freedom of speech, press, and assembly.
      1. +30
        20 May 2014 11: 19
        Our allies are increasing, it’s a pity that they are being fired smile
        1. WKS
          +12
          20 May 2014 11: 23
          Quote: ZU-23
          Our allies are increasing, it’s a pity that they are being fired

          Victims of the information war.
          1. GDP
            +19
            20 May 2014 11: 33
            A country of "freedom" and "democratic values".
            The West has long been not even trying to somehow hide its true face.
            Fantastic hypocrisy and duplicity, elevated to the rank of public policy and lifestyle!
            And disgraced editor - Respect!
            1. 0
              20 May 2014 12: 24
              He never really tried
            2. +10
              20 May 2014 12: 37
              This woman suffered for the truth, and our "alternatives" -shenderovichs are not even responsible for lies ...
              1. 0
                23 May 2014 07: 39
                so maybe we should close these poodles? well, they didn’t have a constructive relationship with their colleagues and they finally lost the support of the population.
          2. 0
            21 May 2014 22: 25
            Quote: wks
            Victims of the information war.

            Rather, they are fighters of information warfare. Successful fighters. And the best, as you know, "die" first.
          3. 0
            22 May 2014 14: 34
            need to maintain at the highest level. then there will be more such voices, and more
        2. avg
          +12
          20 May 2014 11: 30
          Well Jill gives. It seems to be an adult woman, and sometimes it sometimes blurs the truth ... fool I would take an example with Jen Psaki, I would already work as a speechwriter for Obama.
          1. +8
            20 May 2014 11: 50
            A speechwriter is like, like, like a monica.?
            1. +22
              20 May 2014 11: 59
              Monica - Vacuum Maker
            2. +2
              20 May 2014 16: 51
              Well, that you are completely different things. Here is a professional anal prostitution, and there is amateur romance. The girl was also proud after that - to think only - at the president himself!
          2. +8
            20 May 2014 12: 27
            Quote: avg
            Would take an example with Jen Psaki,


            To do this, you need to pump out 70% of the brain.
            1. +1
              22 May 2014 10: 32
              generally say about 4% works. so that will not affect ...
            2. +1
              22 May 2014 15: 43
              95% must be deflated.
          3. +2
            20 May 2014 12: 28
            Well Psaki specialties of the "highest" level.
          4. raf
            +1
            21 May 2014 19: 12
            Probably not everyone is weak on the front end, like this scum scary with a foul name.
        3. +37
          20 May 2014 12: 10
          Here we reproach all Amer journalists, but it’s like that ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +4
        20 May 2014 11: 45
        Quote: Samaritan
        The first amendment declared the main achievement of a democratic society - freedom of speech, press, and assembly.

        It seems to me that this amendment is wiped every day in the State Department and the White House. It hangs in latches instead of toilet paper.
        1. -1
          22 May 2014 10: 35
          they have their own freedom. because they have their own values. their own world.
    2. +6
      20 May 2014 11: 19
      According to Reedus, The New York Times editor-in-chief Jill Abramson has lost her job due to her over-independence and refusal to comply with “corporate standards”.

      It can’t be !!! This is in the first democracy in the universe! Where freedom of speech is above all! wassat
      1. +19
        20 May 2014 11: 21
        freedom angela davis !!! good otherwise we will fly to you ........ PS:
        Abramson did not want to build a productive relationship with me. In the end, I came to the conclusion that she finally lost the support of her colleagues, ”said The Arthur
        already age is not the one to build constructive relations in cabinets, it's not Monica
    3. +4
      20 May 2014 11: 21
      Quote: mig31
      Freedom of speech in the State Department ...

      But so "democratic". wassat Since it does not share the position of the Obama administration and the owner, free and independent, of the newspaper - to the exit!
      To "lie" that there are no Russians in the militia is a shame for the "free and independent" press.laughing
    4. +1
      20 May 2014 11: 42
      Quote: mig31
      Freedom of speech in the State Department ...

      Here it is, true bullshit.
    5. +2
      20 May 2014 11: 44
      Quote: mig31
      Freedom of speech in the State Department ...

      Freedom of speech is guaranteed to the State Department, therefore it is a mistake to assume that freedom of speech is guaranteed to everyone hi
    6. +2
      20 May 2014 11: 46
      Quote: mig31
      Freedom of speech in the State Department ...

      But as for those who disagree, they are FREE
    7. Klepa
      +3
      20 May 2014 11: 51
      I would even say that freedom of speech is in all its glory.
      Maybe it’s time to stop hypocrisy and admit that complete freedom of speech in any state is a utopia: it does not exist, did not exist and never will be?
    8. +2
      20 May 2014 12: 23
      This is called "corporate standards"
    9. +3
      20 May 2014 12: 42
      Quote:
      - But what about freedom of speech ???
      - and only one word has freedom here ... and this word is mine !!!
      (c) Election Day.
    10. +1
      21 May 2014 22: 43
      Quote: mig31
      Freedom of speech in the State Department ...

      Rather - Gestapo-like freedom of speech.
  2. +10
    20 May 2014 11: 07
    Here she is. Freedom of Speech Democratically
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      20 May 2014 11: 23
      there is no such word in the American language as "freedom of speech"
      tell any american: "svoboda slova"
      he will clap eyes and scratch turnips
      1. +3
        20 May 2014 11: 40
        Andrew! hi
        If you tell them your opinion
        he will clap eyes and scratch turnips
        Then they have exactly the wiring in my head will burn!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +15
    20 May 2014 11: 08
    He didn’t want to lie brazenly - he was fired! smile
    1. +6
      20 May 2014 11: 19
      Quote: Alexander12
      He didn’t want to lie brazenly - he was fired!

      And the inhabitants of the freest country in the world are firmly convinced that their media are the most truthful in the world!
      They generally have the same thing! Including freedom.
      Freedom from shame, freedom from conscience, freedom from the dictatorship of one’s own head, freedom from reality ....
      Still to the whole world to find freedom from their excessive claims!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        20 May 2014 11: 32
        reporters reported that there are no citizens of the Russian Federation in the pro-Russian militia

        but they should have written about evil husbands with a fume in earflaps with balalaikas and bears bully
        that’s the misfortune I received by dictation recourse
  4. Children BuryKonya
    +10
    20 May 2014 11: 08
    I think Psaki will be appointed in her place.
    1. +4
      20 May 2014 11: 18
      Psaki, Klitschko - HORROR! Is it really not visible that they are DULL !.
  5. +22
    20 May 2014 11: 09
    The RT agency (Russia today) already has experience in accepting honest reporters who have suffered from the so-called American-style freedom of speech in their team. Looking forward to our ranks.
  6. +7
    20 May 2014 11: 10
    The blockade of the mind continues
  7. Pasus
    +6
    20 May 2014 11: 11
    A report from Slavyansk is a patronage of Jill Abramson for admission to work, for example, on RT
    1. +2
      20 May 2014 11: 45
      Pasus
      A report from Slavyansk is a patronage of Jill Abramson for admission to work, for example, on RT

      And her surname is suitable - tank! Almost "Abrams", and a part of it - indicates a masculine character!
      And tanks of mud are not afraid! So I went ahead, in my own rut!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. +2
    20 May 2014 11: 12
    Released a good article. Even then, many predicted the end of a career. Sorry!!!
  9. +3
    20 May 2014 11: 12
    Well done aunty, smart girl. And now go to work in another publication, and write an article about freedom of speech in the USA, show an alternative point of view, so to speak.
  10. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 13
    Democracy in action. She apparently thought that they had democracy. And got it. soldier
  11. buser
    +3
    20 May 2014 11: 14
    I doubt the former editor-in-chief of the New Times will be unemployed. But the ratings of the newspaper will fall, then do not go to the grandmother. This is not the newspaper "Pravda" of the Union times with an iron circulation !!!
  12. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 14
    here is real american freedom of speech .....
  13. -Patriot-
    0
    20 May 2014 11: 15
    They have the same freedom of speech, as far as I remember ... Something is not glued here No. laughing
  14. +2
    20 May 2014 11: 15
    And tomorrow she will be added to the list of sub-sanctions !!! smile
  15. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 15
    The State Department has already got a lot of people with its stupidity and criminal behavior. And, business in America is in a certain position, although judging by the name of the owner of the publication, he is in solidarity with the State Department.
  16. waisson
    +4
    20 May 2014 11: 15
    ---------------- hi
  17. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 16
    Democracy, please, didn’t say either on the street or even in prison. There is no freedom of speech in America.
  18. waisson
    +12
    20 May 2014 11: 18
    THERE ARE REAL CORRESPONDENTS AND THERE ARE MEMBERS
    1. +2
      20 May 2014 11: 23
      I will definitely show at the meeting of the Scientific Council !!!!
  19. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 18
    They’re just picking the wrong staff ... blatant incompetence ... they would take Schuster, Shenderovich and other similar boreographers to themselves - then yes! laughing
  20. 0
    20 May 2014 11: 20
    Why is the American press stupidly silent about what is already obvious? Well, mine.
  21. +2
    20 May 2014 11: 22
    No wonder - who feeds the girl dances her - capitalism!
  22. +2
    20 May 2014 11: 25
    In the end, I came to the conclusion that she finally lost the support of her colleagues, ”said the publisher

    Like, we consulted and I decided.
  23. Orc-xnumx
    0
    20 May 2014 11: 28
    Freedom of speech, however!
  24. vladsolo56
    0
    20 May 2014 11: 30
    And what about freedom of speech, everyone can say what he wants, and even the truth, only any employer can freely dismiss you for the truth. Such is freedom.
    1. +3
      20 May 2014 11: 50
      vladsolo56
      And what about freedom of speech, everyone can say what he wants, and even the truth, only any employer can freely dismiss you for the truth. Such is freedom.

      Vladimir! hi
      It reminds an old joke about Petka and Vasily Ivanovich:
      - Vasily Ivanovich! What is perestroika and democracy?
      “They will give you, Petka, a good horse, a new saddle, a new saber and rifle!”
      - And what is it, Vasily Ivanovich, publicity?
      - You can say what you want, and when you want!
      “How is that?” And nothing will happen?
      - Nothing will happen! ..... Neither a good horse, nor a saddle and a new rifle!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  25. ks
    ks
    +1
    20 May 2014 11: 36
    Learning is necessary. Americans robbed the whole world, and Russia is to blame, eh dodgers.
  26. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 38
    Quote: mig31
    Freedom of speech in the State Department ...

    Typical American democracy, deceitful and impudent.
  27. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 42
    another pawn eaten by the beak queen, sorry ...
  28. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 43
    It is dangerous in America to tell the truth and bring it to the attention of readers, mattress democracy in action.
  29. 0
    20 May 2014 11: 49
    And only one word has freedom ... (c)
    wink
  30. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 50
    here it is "democracy" amerikosovski in full growth !!! just try to say something wrong ...
  31. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 50
    What are the phrases "without consulting colleagues and not wanting to build productive relationships with me." or “I came to the conclusion that she has completely lost the support of her colleagues.” This is democracy !!!
  32. +2
    20 May 2014 11: 51
    I suffered for the TRUTH, poor fellow! To Russia, in protest! And revealing articles about US politics around the world! This will be a brilliant move! the Yankees choke on bile! laughing
  33. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 52
    Defending the truth, kindness and honesty in the United States have long moved to cinemas from Hollywood, and even there they are catastrophically losing their positions. The State Department says that, for example, he is fighting global terrorism. However, in his opinion. terrorists are those who are against US policy. If they organize terrorist attacks on US territory, then they are terrorists, if on the territory of their "partner" (by the way, with the money of American taxpayers), then they are "rebels are fighting for freedom with truly democratic means." ... Their consciousness is "dislocated" - "Everything that we say (even if there is no connection with reality) is true what others say - (even if it is actually true) - a lie!" Previously, they, illnesses, had to do auto-training (self-hypnosis). Now everything is easier - consciousness is disabled!
    But there are also smart people in the camp of rams, proving that white is white and nothing else! But they are fired, hushed up, suspended! Free Speech in America - MYTH!
  34. timur73
    +1
    20 May 2014 11: 54
    The Americans are an "exceptional nation", they teach everyone when to consider terrorists, and when to be "desperate people", when buildings can be seized, and when not, when force can be used and when not. And the dismissal of a journalist is not an example of total pressure on the media, but the editorial policy. How did these guys get everyone, both "friends" and enemies. But the joke is that the current administration of the State Department is somehow petty, touchy, hysterical, not far-sighted, not professional. There is no need for strength, but it was not there. In our time, everything has changed, both in information technology, and in the alignment of forces and means in the world, and in the heads of people.
  35. 0
    20 May 2014 11: 54
    Well done! Keep it up!!!
  36. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 57
    Let him move to Russia. Putin will give her Russian citizenship, an apartment in the suburbs and work in a prestigious publishing house. Or maybe he will award him with an order. And in America, she’s surely going to get hurt now. Ordinary Americans may support her morally, but finding a job can be very problematic.
  37. +1
    20 May 2014 11: 59
    Fired, progress on the face. And it could well "commit suicide, realizing delusions", "get into an accident, purely by accident" ... the State Department is shallow.
  38. -3
    20 May 2014 12: 08
    Quote: Svetlana
    Let him move to Russia. Putin will give her Russian citizenship, an apartment in the suburbs and work in a prestigious publishing house. Or maybe he will award him with an order.

    Why not ? Will live on the same platform with Depardieu. laughing
    I remember the old caricature of the series - Slave Izaura.
    There are two collective farmers, opposite each other, each holding a bag of potatoes per centner weight
    So one says
    - I look at slave Isaur - my heart bleeds
    Doesn’t resemble anything? And Svetlana laughing
    1. +3
      20 May 2014 12: 52
      With rotten you gave some sort of joke ... doesn’t it?

      Those who in the USSR dragged a centner of potatoes on themselves knew that all this was for the sake of the country. And the slaves, the characters of the mentioned film, and those on whom these historical realities can be projected, knew that all their work was for the benefit of the Master. There is a difference.

      Accidentally put you a plus.
  39. +2
    20 May 2014 12: 14
    Take her to "Russia Today".
  40. 0
    20 May 2014 12: 22
    Well, even such a precedent already says a lot, so I think many NYT readers will notice after what events ch. the editor lost his post.
  41. 0
    20 May 2014 12: 26
    For me, with this dismissal, she showed the people how the State Department actually uses the first for editing! (I'm talking about the people who still know how to think)
  42. Anton-sed
    0
    20 May 2014 12: 29
    Glory to the shit democracy!
  43. +13
    20 May 2014 12: 34
    What a society, and realities
  44. 0
    20 May 2014 12: 34
    A man like that !!! To tell the truth in America, you still have to dare! Arti, take the heroine to you)
  45. 0
    20 May 2014 12: 41
    To the madness of the brave we sing a song ...
    It turns out that honesty is not an honor in the states.
  46. +1
    20 May 2014 12: 43
    For Simonyan, a ready-made and skilled worker. Let them take it in the Republic of Tatarstan.
  47. +1
    20 May 2014 12: 46
    Yes, and to hell with her !!! I knew where and for whom she works !!! Dismissed for the truth, Eka is unseen, if only for lies, for example, PSACI! In, the news would be!soldier
    1. +1
      20 May 2014 13: 14
      Yes, the whole question is that at first she was accused of being imperious, rude to people.
      At first they lied to her!
      And now it turned out FOR WHAT REALLY she was fired.
      Now, not only does she DO NOT BELIEVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH AMERICAN, but also other Americans.
      Well, of course we knew everything in advance. Here we are so smart.
      1. Kisel
        -3
        20 May 2014 13: 37
        ,, ... Well, of course we knew everything in advance. These are we smart. ,, and saints! love
        1. 0
          22 May 2014 12: 22
          You must be able to distinguish irony from self-irony.
          And I don’t put you cons.
          You just did not understand the meaning of my last line.
  48. +1
    20 May 2014 12: 47
    American Journalism: There are two opinions - the State Department and the wrong one. And they are still trying to teach someone to live. Ghouls
  49. +2
    20 May 2014 12: 48
    It is fashionable now to declare journalists as terrorists. This is what they do to our journalists, and soon, apparently, our entire RT channel will be declared a terrorist organization in order to ban it completely. And we have today on the 1st channel celebrated in the morning "jeans birthday". A week ago, we celebrated the birthday of the "American bubble gum". If we compare the information war with the war of 1941-1945, then the Americans are already near Smolensk, they have already captured Kiev. Of course, silence is golden. But how not to be silent in today's environment.
  50. Serge56
    +1
    20 May 2014 13: 07
    And here is what Svetlana Aliluyeva (Stalin's daughter) wrote, in the seventies, having lived in America for several years:
    "... America's best people suffer from the 'free press' and find it vulgar, ignorant, distorting the truth, and deeply negative about everything ...
    ... The militaristic aspirations and propaganda in America is truly as wild and full of hatred as can be observed in the USSR ... "

    And about ordinary people, about the country itself it spoke well.
    1. 0
      23 May 2014 07: 15
      100%! I completely agree with Aliluyeva! Itself went through this here in the USA. And ordinary people here are the same as ours ... in the Union.
  51. Kisel
    +1
    20 May 2014 13: 31
    Jill Abramson is the only woman to serve as editor-in-chief of the newspaper in its 160-year history, and Dean Bucket (former editor of the Los Angeles Times) is the first African American.
    Chief editor of Komsomolskaya Pravda Vladimir Sungorkin: “I think this is a political decision. There are several media outlets in which only political decisions are made at this level - The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, The Wall Street Journal. These big four are American ", in fact, chooses what is right and what is wrong. And she is the main mouthpiece of the American elite. Therefore, the decision is clearly political"
    “There can always be such suspicions; we need to deeply understand each story with its meaning. And just like with the dismissal of the editor-in-chief, there are always many circumstances. It often happens that what is called the main and important reason is in fact only a reason or the last drop, this happens,” said Vladimir Mamontov, director of the Smart Internet Foundation.
    Following this news, the company's stock price fell almost 5%, reaching a 28-year low.
  52. -1
    20 May 2014 13: 48
    The totalitarian regime hasn’t come up with anything new other than hampering freedom of speech; the United States is no longer a democracy!
    1. 0
      22 May 2014 12: 19
      I don't give anyone downvotes just like that. I won't bet it on you either.
      But please write more correctly. You are a lieutenant colonel. wink
  53. +1
    20 May 2014 14: 59
    You have to keep up with everyone, there’s no point in standing out as a black sheep, otherwise, you see, she didn’t find any Russian soldiers, when in Slavyansk there’s a battalion on every corner.
    1. Mih
      0
      22 May 2014 23: 39
      Comrade Major, from the battalion? You are mistaken - according to the GRU special forces regiment (In general, what is this - GRU special forces? Please clarify, unless this is super secret information) laughing
  54. +2
    20 May 2014 15: 08
    She apparently believed too much in mattress shit democracy and freedom of speech!!!
  55. 0
    20 May 2014 15: 59
    “In the end I came to the conclusion that she had completely lost the support of her colleagues,”

    That's what freedom of speech is all about. It’s more likely that she didn’t lose the support of her colleagues, but rather refused to comply with your instructions.
  56. +1
    20 May 2014 16: 14
    It is rare to meet a person in such a high position with the concepts of journalistic ethics... well done... she was not afraid to show independence.
  57. +3
    20 May 2014 16: 31
    When the former US Secretary of Defense was asked whether Russia is an enemy of America, he replied that America's enemies are in the White House and the Capitol. Quite right.
  58. artur
    0
    20 May 2014 17: 55
    Cheap horror room: dark and rakes everywhere.
  59. +1
    20 May 2014 21: 54
    Health and strong nerves Jill Abramson.
  60. +1
    21 May 2014 15: 12
    Take her to Russia Today with a good salary, it will pay off.
    It will be an excellent time bomb in an information war.
    And this war is in full swing.
    1. PM74
      0
      23 May 2014 07: 09
      It won’t work, they are seriously considering the option of closing the Russia Today TV channel as it does not present the material objectively
      1. PM74
        0
        23 May 2014 07: 11
        Sorry, not closing, but stopping broadcasting in the USA
  61. +1
    21 May 2014 15: 17
    Freedom of speech among the beacons of democracy..................
  62. +1
    21 May 2014 18: 22
    We urgently need to employ this editor at RT!
  63. Bormental
    +2
    21 May 2014 18: 50
    Issue a grant from Russia and hire in the Republic of Tatarstan.
  64. raf
    +1
    21 May 2014 19: 10
    laughing In-in "freedom of speech" and double standards in person and in action! Mattress hypocrites!!!
  65. +1
    21 May 2014 19: 44
    Hmm ....
    Here it is - “FREEDOM OF SPEECH” in the USA, “IN ALL ITS BEAUTY”!...
  66. luka095
    +1
    21 May 2014 20: 48
    There is nothing surprising in what happened. This is standard practice. And there is no need to be indignant. There has never been a so-called free press. This is a myth for readers. Whoever pays decides what to print.
  67. +1
    21 May 2014 21: 08
    I ask the entire staff of the site not to downvote... but this is how spies were sometimes legalized before implementation. This is an option. And so yes, brave. And she probably knew that they would comb her hair against the grain.
    1. Mih
      0
      22 May 2014 23: 45
      but in this way spies were sometimes legalized

      And this may be... or maybe not. That is the question. Poor Erik. stop
  68. 0
    21 May 2014 21: 17
    Everyone has a conscience, even complete scumbags.
    So her dismissal is a direct admission of her untruth.
  69. +1
    21 May 2014 21: 34
    Sorry Auntie. Well, yes, I think she can take care of herself.
    1. 0
      23 May 2014 07: 46
      Quote: Comrade Bender
      Sorry Auntie. Well, yes, I think she can take care of herself.

      Yes Yes! It's a pity! I was left penniless, one might say! She was making $750,000 a year in this position... Will RT pay her the same?
  70. 0
    22 May 2014 00: 20
    Why are they so scary?
  71. 0
    22 May 2014 00: 48
    Purge of the media before the devaluation of the dollar (decrease in the standard of living of Americans) and, as a consequence, inevitable criticism of the Obama administration. They work ahead of the curve. Apparently something serious is brewing.
  72. 0
    22 May 2014 02: 45
    Russia and the United States are engaged in an information war. The media are troops! A journalist’s speech “on the enemy’s side” is promptly suppressed.
    Our government and the Duma are largely liberal, so they will not harshly silence various Shenderovichs and Makareviches. And this needs to be done. We need ideas on how, while remaining within the legal framework, to push them into the deep periphery of the network.
  73. necha265
    0
    22 May 2014 09: 20
    How hard it is for them “poor fellows” in the West, and they are forbidden to think about Russians!! am
  74. 0
    22 May 2014 11: 43
    they fired me for telling the truth!!!! that’s democracy and freedom of speech in the Western style!!!!
  75. 0
    22 May 2014 12: 45
    This one got fired! And Psaki?
  76. ssjack
    0
    22 May 2014 13: 52
    http://www.stopfake.org/fejk-glavreda-the-new-york-times-uvolili-iz-za-stati-o-s
    lavyanske/
  77. 0
    22 May 2014 13: 57
    They don’t like the truth, and even more so they don’t like truthful journalists.
  78. 0
    22 May 2014 16: 18
    The myth of "Freedom of Speech" in action. My bow to the editor.
  79. Zauralec
    0
    22 May 2014 18: 21
    Well done, auntie, going against the grain in a fascist country is a feat, to say the least.
  80. +1
    22 May 2014 21: 32
    What can I say?
  81. Mih
    0
    22 May 2014 23: 24
    It is worth noting that Jill Abramson has a reputation as a stubborn and aggressive leader.
    Pssaki is the best psaki with canoe.
  82. Vlad Gore
    0
    23 May 2014 05: 11
    According to Reedus, The New York Times editor-in-chief Jill Abramson lost her position due to excessive independence and refusal to comply with “corporate standards.” According to local media, the publication's owners decided to replace her with former Los Angeles Times editor Dean Bucket in connection with the publication of a report from Slavyansk on May 3.
    Such people need to be supported. You can get a job at Russia Today. Especially an experienced journalist. Yes
  83. 0
    23 May 2014 07: 37
    I would like to emphasize that Jill herself has not yet publicly stated the reasons for her dismissal. There are different rumors and most likely she is simply gaining capital by maintaining the intrigue.
    My opinion: Let's wait for her memoirs. It's very popular here... and profitable. The intrigue has just begun, which means you can make money from it. Don’t forget, the girl is already 60 years old. Her character is really not sweet. In addition, she is a pronounced feminist (whether this is good or bad, let everyone decide for themselves). One of the reasons for her dismissal (according to the official version), by the way, was that she actively promoted women to editorial positions in the newspaper. When she became editor-in-chief of the NWI Times in Aug. In 2011, out of 9 editors, 8 were men. At the time of dismissal, women already occupied 5 of the 9 editorial positions.
    NN TIMES' position is: "Women are being disadvantaged, we need to fix that and selectively promote women to leadership positions. But Jill has gone too far."
  84. Pitekmex
    0
    23 May 2014 09: 05
    Cable

    wire, VVGNG 5x10
  85. 0
    23 May 2014 09: 59
    Well, not everyone there is a dog... Fortunately...
  86. 0
    23 May 2014 10: 57
    What the hell is democracy and freedom of speech? Remember how the tie eater attacked Ossetia? The entire demo press was choking with saliva blaming Russia. So what then? Let us remember the photographs about the alleged genocide that Milosevic carried out against Albanians in Kosovo. And reports from the Chechen war. They have few honest journalists. Commerce though.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"