Military Review

US urged Russia to help take out chemical weapons from Syria

41
According to RIA "News", on Monday, White House spokesman Jay Carney called on Russia to assist in the export of the remaining chemical weapons from the territory of Syria.


“At the moment, it has been exported to destroy 92,5% of chemical weapons that belonged to the Syrian regime and have been identified (by the international community). But we are concerned about how they fulfill their obligation to export the remaining 7,5%, ”he said. “We expect Syria to fulfill its obligations, and we expect that Russia, which in fact vouches for Syria in this matter, will fulfill its obligations.”

In addition, Karni noted that “no actions are now intended” to achieve the fulfillment of the commitments from Syria, but this issue is taken “very seriously”. According to the press secretary, the export of the remaining chemicals is difficult due to collisions near the warehouses where they are stored.

It is worth noting that last week high-ranking officials from several countries shared their suspicions that chemical weapons continue to be used in Syria. According to French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, they have data on 14 suspected cases of Syrian military use of chemical weapons against militants since October 2013.

It is worth recalling that in late February, the Syrian authorities submitted a new plan for the export of all chemicals from their territory until 27 in April. However, it was not possible to implement it. According to the resolution of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, Syria must completely get rid of chemical weapons by the end of June 2014.
Photos used:
http://ria.ru/
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. JoylyRoger
    JoylyRoger 20 May 2014 09: 12
    +1
    Like, you will do the dirty work, and we will give it ** as we can, but you are kind, you can bear it!)
    1. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB 20 May 2014 09: 24
      +4
      There is a suspicion that as soon as Syria withdraws chemical weapons, there will be a reason for the attack from Israel ...
      1. 225chay
        225chay 20 May 2014 09: 52
        +3
        ShturmKGB
        There is a suspicion that as soon as Syria withdraws chemical weapons, there will be a reason for the attack from Israel ...


        It's time to help Syria with the C 300
        1. dkflbvbh
          dkflbvbh 20 May 2014 16: 30
          0
          They have been there for a long time.
      2. Alex_Popovson
        Alex_Popovson 20 May 2014 10: 50
        +1
        attacks from israel

        Well, these attacks are already there. True Israel is pounding without understanding, bearded men, feds. Stupidly hits where there is an accumulation of forces.
        Then, chemical weapons were not a deterrent, especially in Syria. This is so to speak for the latest suicide attack or all-in game.
        Also, all chemical weapons and delivery vehicles, etc. are under control. this the world community. At this point, no one will be bothered and will not carry out the "double standard" policy.
        And the absence of even a hint even of chemical weapons greatly helps Bashik or his successor politically. The opportunity arises: a) to cut the local budget when purchasing Chinese and Russian pieces of iron, b) cheerfully and hi-tech, with conventional army units, to beat the violators of territorial integrity and other Turks.
        Taksho Ninado consider chemical weapons as a deterrent, everything is exactly the opposite
      3. yushch
        yushch 20 May 2014 16: 31
        0
        The trick of our striped friends is not ruled out, but they themselves recognize RUSSIA as the guarantor of the agreement, and such a development of events was certainly discussed there and there were any agreements on any.
    2. from punk
      from punk 20 May 2014 09: 41
      0
      Quote: JoylyRoger
      Like, you will do the dirty work, and we will give it ** as we can, but you are kind, you can bear it!)

      this is a hint that expect new sanctions
    3. 225chay
      225chay 20 May 2014 09: 51
      +1
      Quote: JoylyRoger
      Like, you will do the dirty work, and we will give it ** as we can, but you are kind, you can bear it!)

      "The United States called on Russia ..."
      Isn't it time to send them to the cow already?
    4. xenod55
      xenod55 20 May 2014 13: 27
      0
      Here are the shtatovskie bzdyuki. Two or three weeks ago, these state officials said that they had included a REFUSAL to help Russia in the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons in the package of sanctions against Russia. And now they sing the opposite. The "obamka barrack" is a complete mess.
  2. Cormorants
    Cormorants 20 May 2014 09: 14
    +7
    I suggest disposing of the remaining volume on Capitol Hill =)
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. fzr1000
    fzr1000 20 May 2014 09: 15
    +2
    How to spoil everyone else, and to your own advantage, so the United States is the first, and how to help for free, they call Russia.
  4. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 20 May 2014 09: 15
    0
    But we are concerned about how they fulfill the obligation to export the remaining 7,5%,

    They think where it is better to withdraw ..to Washington or Tel Aviv ..))) bully
  5. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 20 May 2014 09: 16
    +9
    The West has its own interests ... we have our own.

    This is a good reason to put your Navy on a raid off the coast of Syria (and Syria needs to be supported) ... declare the coastal territory forbidden for militants under the pretext of a safe corridor for the export of chemical weapons.
    And for a couple of years (to begin with), "search and inspect" possible storage sites ... under the guise of their navies as a guarantor of countering threats from militants ... providing support for Syria.
    1. rasputin17
      rasputin17 20 May 2014 09: 54
      0
      Our squadron is already standing off the coast of Syria. And this proposal will strengthen it and provide opportunities for greater control. In other matters, we will take out chemical weapons and put in there something more interesting that does not fall under resolutions and conventions !! wink
  6. Vadim-Skeptic
    Vadim-Skeptic 20 May 2014 09: 17
    0
    The export and destruction of Syrian chemical weapons is carried out under the auspices of the UN. And what about Russia? They want to mess us up - like Russia in an insidious arrangement with the terrible regime of al-Assad.
  7. Sterlya
    Sterlya 20 May 2014 09: 19
    0
    These arrogant 3.14s themselves interfere with everything that is being done (by supporting terrorists) and lack the audacity to ask Russia to assist. (arrogant Saxons in his repertoire)
    they say "Assad's regime" although he is the legally elected president, and God bless him. But they do not say the regime of the Junta of Ukraine, which came to power by means of a coup and the genocidal Russian-speaking population. (all in Naglosak)
  8. Gagarin
    Gagarin 20 May 2014 09: 20
    +3
    Compliance with Russia of all its obligations and these guarantees will add weight to the image of the country.
    Let the whole world know RUSSIA SAID - MADE!
  9. Roshchin
    Roshchin 20 May 2014 09: 21
    +1
    It’s very nice that senior officials finally shared their suspicions that the chemical was still being used in Syria. weapons, of course not terrorists, supported by the same officials. Those. you can blame Assad and bomb at any time.
  10. VADEL
    VADEL 20 May 2014 09: 23
    +5
    And let them ask well. Something like this:
    1. rasputin17
      rasputin17 20 May 2014 09: 56
      0
      These bastards when asked well then very thinly and vilely shit !!!
  11. FunkschNNX
    FunkschNNX 20 May 2014 09: 26
    +1
    Syria’s chemical weapons were at least a guarantee against NATO’s ground operation. Now it remains only to rely on their decency. But I would not really count on it. They have recently vouched for the Ukrainian opposition, less than a day later all their promises were violated by their own Maidan protégés.
  12. mamont5
    mamont5 20 May 2014 09: 27
    +1
    "So far, 92,5% of chemical weapons belonging to the Syrian regime have been removed for destruction."

    But what about the chemical weapons that belong to pro-pro-militants and are not taken into account by anyone? It would be better if the states worried about him.
  13. sledge
    sledge 20 May 2014 09: 35
    +1
    But what about the sanctions? How can an evil aggressor ask for help?
  14. Yellow white
    Yellow white 20 May 2014 09: 36
    0
    and I would "sniff" a little, well, just in case ...
  15. jovanni
    jovanni 20 May 2014 09: 38
    0
    Famously Americans distribute to whom in the world what to do. They crap everywhere, and we rake?
  16. APS
    APS 20 May 2014 09: 38
    0
    From these "diplomats" one can only expect dirty tricks ...
  17. Afinogen
    Afinogen 20 May 2014 09: 40
    +1
    As soon as the last chemical is taken out. weapons, so immediately vile Americans will strike at Syria. There may not be a ground operation, but the "Tomahawks" are picking up all of Syria.
  18. lexxxus
    lexxxus 20 May 2014 09: 50
    +1
    assist in the removal of the remaining chemical weapons from Syria

    Only, so as not to go empty, you need to throw other weapons there.
  19. STALGRAD76
    STALGRAD76 20 May 2014 09: 55
    +1
    Here are the rulers of the United States all the same funny,
    imagine - on the board of directors any decision was made about the enterprise, all managers and superiors were notified about it by order of the plant, but there was one sheep or a dumb guy. security service, which on a planning meeting, to the amazement of the leader, repeats this decision with this appearance and, as it were, setting the task for the rest belay ,
    normal people - laugh;
    lizoblyudy - diligently record and nod Bosko;
    to everyone else - in his farts ...
  20. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 20 May 2014 10: 01
    +2
    Yes, just their Syrians will not let them in and kick their ass, as they see!
  21. JonnyT
    JonnyT 20 May 2014 10: 02
    0
    The United States calls)))) we also call for de-escalation of crises, and in response to slurred mumble and quiet support for bloodshed ..... and now should we answer their calls ?????? or is it worth paying back with the same coin?
  22. siberalt
    siberalt 20 May 2014 10: 11
    0
    I hear a jingle, but where is he from. And what does Russia refuse to help with the export of chemical weapons? laughing The message of the article is not clear.
  23. valentina-makanalina
    valentina-makanalina 20 May 2014 10: 14
    0
    “We are concerned about how they fulfill the obligation to export the remaining 7,5%,” he said. “We expect Syria to fulfill its obligations, and we expect that Russia, which actually warrants Syria in this matter, will fulfill its obligations.”
    In addition, Karni noted that “no actions are now intended” to achieve the fulfillment of the commitments from Syria, but this issue is taken “very seriously”. According to the press secretary, the export of the remaining chemicals is difficult due to collisions near the warehouses where they are stored.

    The question arises. Who is supposed to export chemical weapons under the contract? If the Americans, then let them take them out. We do not mind. Syria too. And the fact that they are fighting near the warehouses ".... these are not our problems.
    We did not give weapons to the rebels and do not support them. Let the Americans themselves agree with them.
  24. Tulip
    Tulip 20 May 2014 10: 17
    0
    Something NATO is not very consistent. First, they break off relations with us, and then they ask for help.
  25. Everest2014
    Everest2014 20 May 2014 10: 21
    0
    We will sanction you with pressure on the EU to support sanctions, and you will help us to remove and dispose of chemical weapons at our own expense wink Very American.
  26. buzer
    buzer 20 May 2014 10: 53
    0
    but I will not betray to prepare the State Department ??? Well, if the UN would ask ... And then the USA itself asks !!! Well, they seem nowhere cooler if they believe their rhetoric and Hollywood films ??? If Russia buys and agrees to take out the rest of the chemical weapons, then immediately somewhere in Syria a chemical attack will happen !!! Guess once who will be blamed ???
  27. Weniamin
    Weniamin 20 May 2014 11: 07
    0
    Is it weak yourself? All Russia.
  28. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 20 May 2014 11: 11
    0
    We have been suspended from the operation to remove chemical weapons, suspended and we will be fools if we ourselves climb into this village ... Ukraine is not enough for us, there can happen any provocations with the use of these weapons that we are accused of, but do we need it? Let them tremble to the end, because it was their desire to remove weapons.
  29. Goha
    Goha 20 May 2014 11: 36
    0
    We need to act more decisively.
  30. yulka2980
    yulka2980 20 May 2014 13: 57
    0
    The USA, as always, doesn’t eat fish and ... and don’t wash the pan! Russia acts as a monkey, carrying chestnuts out of the fire! No.
  31. artur
    artur 20 May 2014 17: 35
    0
    As usual, Russia does nothing