Military Review

New military equipment on the parade 9 May

41
In the parade on Red Square, which took place on 9 in May on 2005, on the day of the 60 anniversary of the end of World War II, the aircraft of the Russian Air Force took part for the first time in many years. During the 2008 parade of the year, the ground-based military equipment re-entered the main square of the country after a long break. After that, both foot units and military equipment of various types and classes participate in parades on 9 in May. Soon after the return of the equipment to the parades, a revival of the old Soviet tradition took place: every year a new technique comes to Red Square, which the troops have recently begun to receive. The 2014 parade of the year was no exception. It showed the general public several new types of military equipment.


For the first time, KAMAZ-63968 "Typhoon-K" multi-purpose armored cars appeared on Red Square. 12 armored vehicles of the new model took part in the parade. This technique has not yet been adopted and is being tested. Last year, the Ministry of Defense ordered an experimental batch of 30 armored cars. Nevertheless, the Typhoon-K armored cars were highly appreciated, and in the foreseeable future could become standard ground vehicle equipment.



In the course of work on the Typhoon-K project, KAMAZ employees created a new chassis, which has a number of major differences from previous similar developments. In addition, the new armored car received the original armored hull, protecting the crew and units from bullets and fragments. The armored vehicle with a combat mass of about 21 tons is intended for the transport of personnel and various cargoes. The troop compartment has 16 places for fighters with weapons.

The three-axle all-wheel-drive chassis of the KAMAZ-63968 armored car is equipped with the YMZ-5367 Yaroslavl diesel engine with HP 450 power. and controlled hydropneumatic suspension. According to reports, the armored car "Typhoon-K" is equipped with a combined armor using metal sheets and ceramics. The hull and glass can protect the crew of the car from the armor-piercing bullets of large-caliber small arms. Provides protection from undermining mines under the wheel.



The development of the KAMAZ-63968 "Typhoon-K" armored car began in 2010. To date, built a few dozen machines of this model, which are used in the tests. The exact date of completion of the work has not yet been called. Last fall, it was reported that at the beginning of 2014, the first tests would be held, the purpose of which would be to check the level of protection of armored vehicles. In the absence of serious problems, fine-tuning and testing of the equipment may end before the end of the current year.

Soon after the "Typhoon-K" self-propelled anti-tank missile systems 9K123 "Chrysanthem-S" came to Red Square. These systems are really long-awaited for our army: their development began in the mid-eighties, the first public demonstration took place in 1996, and they were only adopted in 2013. The task of self-propelled ATGM "Chrysanthemum-S" is the destruction of armored vehicles and enemy fortifications using guided missiles.

May 9 on Red Square were machines "Chrysanthemum-S" based on the BMP-3 chassis, equipped with missiles and a complex of special equipment. During the construction of self-propelled ATGMs, automatic ammunition for missiles in transport and launch containers, a set of command and control equipment and a launcher are installed on the chassis. The ammunition complex includes up to 15 9М123 missiles or their modifications. The Chrysanthemum-S complex is equipped with a radar system, which is responsible for tracking targets and missile guidance. The rocket can be controlled both over the radio channel and with the help of a laser beam.



Depending on the modification of the rocket used, the 9K123 “Chrysanthemum-S” complex is capable of hitting targets at distances up to 6 kilometers. The tandem cumulative warhead of the munition is capable of penetrating up to 1250 mm of homogeneous armor, closed by a dynamic protection unit. The composition of the equipment of the complex allows you to attack targets at any time of the day and in all weather conditions.

Since last year, troops receive a new modification of the famous Msta-S self-propelled artillery. Combat vehicles of the 2C19М2 9 model of May also took part in the parade for the first time. Externally, the new self-propelled gun hardly differs from the base model - the most noticeable difference lies in the new on-board screens. Nevertheless, the modernized SAU are equipped with a number of new equipment, thanks to which they have higher characteristics. At the same time, the upgraded self-propelled gun is maximally unified with the basic combat vehicle.



It is known that the automatic control system 2C19М2 received a new automated set of loading mechanisms, as well as a new fire control system. Using the consoles at his workplace, self-propelled gunner can perform their tasks with greater efficiency. In addition, new automated systems are used in the workplace of the driver. The updated automatics allows the upgraded self-propelled Msta-S self-propelled gun to fire at a pace of up to 10 shots per minute, automatically point the gun and restore the correct tip after the shot.

Another novelty at the Victory Day parade was the Tor-MHNUMXU anti-aircraft missile system. This complex is a new system in the line-up ZRK short range "Thor". It differs from the previous complexes of the Tor-M2U family with a set of new equipment, providing higher combat characteristics. In addition, a new missile 2М9K was developed for this purpose. The end of testing of the Tor-MXNUMU complex with a new missile was announced last fall.



The new anti-aircraft complex is able to track up to 48 air targets and attack four of them. Destruction of targets at ranges up to 16 km and altitudes up to 10 km is possible. When developing a new ammunition, the need to destroy small-sized maneuvering targets was taken into account. The Tor-MXNUMU air defense system uses a tracked chassis of the same model as the previous family systems.

New technology shows on May 9 parades have become a good tradition. From this point of view, a parade on Red Square, which will be held next year, may be of particular interest. Currently, work is underway to create a large number of promising technology projects. Some of the new machines can be shown to the public already in 2015 year. For example, several years ago, representatives of the defense industry promised to show the latest Armata tank at the 2015 parade of the year. In addition to this machine, several new universal armored platforms are being created. This means that the following parades on Victory Day will once again become a platform for displaying the latest technology of the armed forces.


On the materials of the sites:
http://rg.ru/
http://vz.ru/
http://ria.ru/
http://vpk.name/
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/
Author:
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. olegff68
    olegff68 19 May 2014 09: 07
    +12
    Oh, how are we all waiting for Armata ....
    And not only in the parade, but mainly in the troops ....
    1. cosmos111
      cosmos111 19 May 2014 10: 09
      +4
      Quote: olegff68
      And not only in the parade, but mainly in the troops ..

      This is the main thing !!!! and not only "Armata" but also "Kurganets-25" and Boomerang "...

      Here is a photo of the ATOM UralVagonZavod armored personnel carrier and is already in metal, not plywood !!!on running factory tests (true information on the topic 000))))

      CAN YOURSELF BE SUCCESSFUL TO MAKE THE APC, TO THE SERIES ...
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 19 May 2014 11: 04
        +2
        Didn't you do the ATOM project with the French? They seem to have stopped cooperating with us in this matter in connection with the sanctions?
      2. silver_roman
        silver_roman 19 May 2014 12: 05
        +2
        purely my opinion: ATOM is a wild heresy, not suitable for troops. With such a silhouette, it will not be difficult to hit him, low ground clearance. if it explodes under the bottom, it will probably tear it in half. Usually they try to make a V-shaped bottom so that the blast wave dissipates. I hope the Kurgan will have nothing to do with this "miscarriage"!
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. scorpiosys
          scorpiosys 20 May 2014 00: 37
          +1
          Something the Atom is larger in size than the constellation, and also, for some reason, the land Mistral, the same - a brick.
  2. ALEXXX1983
    ALEXXX1983 19 May 2014 09: 39
    +3
    Good tradition - showing new technology smile
  3. Rinat 1
    Rinat 1 19 May 2014 10: 06
    +2
    A good tradition, but I would like to see this equipment in the required quantity directly in the troops.
  4. Wolland
    Wolland 19 May 2014 10: 07
    +3
    Pride takes for every parade of our state. Glory to the winners.
  5. Dimsan
    Dimsan 19 May 2014 10: 15
    -5
    Well, at least someone will reveal the secret. Well, why does the army need Thor ???? Out of curiosity, I found information on the Thor and on the Shell in the search engine.
    Thor:
    Affected area:
    range: from 1 to 15 km
    in height: from 0,01 to 10 km
    exchange rate parameter: 8 km
    Reaction time, s: 4,8
    Max. target speed 700 m / s
    The number of simultaneously fired targets: 4
    Maximum missile overload: 30 g
    SAM flight speed 700..800 m / s
    Minimum ESR of the target is 0,05 m² [18]
    Guidance system anti-jamming radio command
    The number of target channels 4 channels
    The number of missiles in a combat vehicle 8 missiles
    Shell:
    Type: two-stage supersonic solid fuel
    Guidance: Radio Command
    Speed ​​(maximum / average at a distance of 18 km): 1300 / 700 m / s [3]
    Max Target Speed: 1000 m / s
    Range to target: 1,2 km - 20 km
    Target Altitude: 15 m - 15 km
    Length: 3,2 m
    Caliber: 170 / 90 mm [4]
    Weight (without / with TPK): 74,5 / 94 kg
    Type of warhead: rod
    Warhead weight: 20 kg
    Weight BB warhead: 5.5 kg

    In all respects, the Shell is better, then what's the point in the Torah ??? By the way, on the caterpillar chassis the Shell also
    1. abc_alex
      abc_alex 19 May 2014 11: 45
      +5
      They have different tasks. Simply put, the Shell is working in the rear, and Thor at the forefront. Only Thunguski and MANPADS work in front of Thor.
      In addition, the torus is better suited to repel massive raids.

      If you look at the air defense system of the object, then the Torah should be located on the outer ring, taking on the bulk of the targets, and the Carapace is internal, carrying out drifting in the near zone.
      By the way, it’s not for nothing that the Shell has a modular design and can be mounted practically anytime, even on the roof, even on the truck.
    2. silver_roman
      silver_roman 19 May 2014 12: 09
      0
      in fact, the TOR is an important link in the air defense chain: the long-range is the S-300, S-400 and modifications ..
      The middle direction is shells, the near direction is TOR. Each complex has its own task. It’s clear that it’s possible to work with shells at close range, there are even automatic guns there, but when everyone covers his sector, it’s more reliable. One insures the other. There will be no TORA, the far distance will be stronger. In short, everything is interconnected. I think the most important thing is the price. The shells are very expensive.
      1. melman
        melman 19 May 2014 15: 13
        +1
        Thor is military air defense, shell of the East Kazakhstan region. The Torah has its own niche in the air defense of the S3000V-BukM2-Tor-Tunguska-MANPADS, each has its own area of ​​responsibility. Carapace for cover S-400, i.e. C400-Carapace. Therefore, it is made on a wheeled chassis. And by the way, TOP also has a modular design and can also be mounted on any chassis, and in addition it can be stationary for example to protect cities.
        1. silver_roman
          silver_roman 19 May 2014 18: 18
          0
          Exactly for sure, confused the shell with Buk!
    3. SAG
      SAG 19 May 2014 18: 35
      0
      ... I can be mistaken, but if my memory serves me well, then the possibilities of the carapace for cover on the march are very limited. Probably this requires a torus, tunguska or silk of the latest modifications ...
    4. understudy
      understudy 20 May 2014 00: 01
      +1
      In modern conditions, air defense does not happen much! repeat
  6. Gray 43
    Gray 43 19 May 2014 10: 16
    +1
    For some reason I thought that "Chrysanthemum-S" had already been adopted, for so long it has been carried at various exhibitions and they promise that, here, they will be accepted into the army, with "Typhoon-K" everything is clear - the car is being developed and tested relatively recently, but what with a bonnet version based on the "Ural"? Have you abandoned it? The Typhoon's motor is Yaroslavl, but the transmission and tires? Imported? The car is quite heavy, which means that all components and assemblies must withstand the load with a margin, as required by the Customer, but the KAMAZ chassis was designed for a long time and not for such equipment, new developments are moving slowly, foreign co-owners are in no hurry to transfer technologies even if ordered from above "they can even shut down the entire joint venture. Even if a working sample is made in some closed "firm", then on what equipment should it be done? Technique in Russia is made good by design, and also by quality as well
    1. abc_alex
      abc_alex 19 May 2014 12: 05
      0
      For some reason I thought that "Chrysanthemum-S" had already been adopted, for so long it has been carried to various exhibitions and they promise that they will be accepted into the army


      Should be to accept in 2006. But they tested and completed almost until last year. I am surprised that they completed it, knowing what was happening until recently with the KBM ... Well, at least now things are returning to normal ...
  7. Energet1k_
    Energet1k_ 19 May 2014 10: 38
    +1
    Handsome in one word, but the soul rejoices and the eye, too =)
  8. Tektor
    Tektor 19 May 2014 12: 14
    0
    I heard about Typhoon that its armor resistance should correspond to grade 8, i.e. protect from 30 mm shells, it seems.
  9. Denimax
    Denimax 19 May 2014 12: 28
    +2
    Quote: cosmos111
    Here is a photo of the ATOM UralVagonZavod armored personnel carrier and is already in metal, not plywood !!!

    I read, I also like the car, I'm For.
    1. cosmos111
      cosmos111 19 May 2014 14: 23
      +3
      Quote: Denimax
      I read, I also like the car, I'm For.


      but, as you may not like it, in terms of weight and armor performance characteristics, it is practically similar to an armored fighting vehicle, "VBCI" from Nexter Systems and "Boxer" from KMW and Rheinmetall ...

      made on its own technological base and with a wonderful modernized S-60 gun 57 mm ...
      1. Hairy Siberian
        Hairy Siberian 19 May 2014 18: 00
        0
        What is also important "Atom" is created with the money of the manufacturers themselves, and not with budget funds.
  10. Gloster
    Gloster 19 May 2014 12: 33
    0
    Very pleased with the parade of technology. It’s a pity they didn’t show TOC Pinocchio and BMPT “Terminator”.
    1. cosmos111
      cosmos111 19 May 2014 14: 57
      0
      Quote: Gloster
      BMPT "Terminator".


      BMPT "Terminator" has not been adopted by the RA at all ... how will it appear at the parade ????
      1. Denimax
        Denimax 19 May 2014 15: 18
        0
        CBT Pinocchio also should not be shown, effective, but very not in Hague. smile
  11. agbykov
    agbykov 19 May 2014 14: 26
    0
    Thanks for the review.
  12. Denimax
    Denimax 19 May 2014 14: 31
    +1
    Quote: cosmos111
    and with the excellent modernized S-60 gun 57 mm ...

    I really like the gun itself, just the best weapon, with the ability to create a large series of types of shells. Here are adjustable, shrapnel, buckshot, with remote detonation. And OFS with armor-piercing BOPS will be very powerful.
    1. cosmos111
      cosmos111 19 May 2014 15: 29
      +2
      Quote: Denimax
      I really like the gun itself, just the best weapon, with the ability to create a large series of types of shells.

      S-60 gun, worked out to the smallest detail ....
      most importantly new shells, with remote detonation ......


      PT-76 and 57-mm automatic gun S-60
  13. virm
    virm 19 May 2014 14: 38
    -2
    Cars it is time to do unmanned. Americans are working hard on this topic. And there are results.
  14. Gray 43
    Gray 43 19 May 2014 15: 30
    0
    CBT "Buratino" is our response to the results of the current Eurovision Song Contest, I think, is a good remedy for infection with a rainbow tint
  15. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 19 May 2014 15: 48
    0
    As far as I know, maybe I'm wrong, but the info was on this site. Thor is more effective for highly maneuverable high-speed targets, they wrote that the carapace is generally powerless against highly-targeted targets.
    1. Denimax
      Denimax 19 May 2014 17: 42
      0
      Perhaps he has a semi-active GOS. The carapace is controlled by radio commands.
      Where did you see highly maneuverable targets? Usually they fly pancake, albeit very fast. A maneuver needs a reason, and it can only be an air battle.
  16. vladstro
    vladstro 19 May 2014 18: 06
    0
    Tremble the adversaries. They probably watched and exclaimed Oh my God every minute! But I guess he let the Latvians diarrhea, they say Russia has a lot of tanks, like our old T-55, it will be one to fight back. laughing
  17. Free wind
    Free wind 19 May 2014 18: 45
    +3
    I don’t understand the creation of armored trucks. Frame armored cars are much more expensive. much less secure. much heavier than their frameless counterparts. Example BTR-152. Although the year of manufacture he has 1950. but in terms of security, he is much superior to KAMAZ products. The only negative is the rather weak engine on the BTR-152. His frontal armor withstood shelling from forty-five. With the BTR coming out of action, without damage to the crew. Shells stuck in the engine. What about kamaz? withstands bullets and splinters. Yes, and the KAMAZ residents are hitting the price ,,, like for an airplane.
    1. cobalt
      cobalt 20 May 2014 07: 34
      +1
      And the weight of the Typhoon is 21 tons, with a half-tank, despite the fact that the BMP-2 weighs 14 tons + floats. How to step on such a colossus, to the first stream. How to fit it into the concept of using mechanized units is not understood. BMP comes with tanks, roads, roads, no difference. Infantry always keeps up with tanks on BMPs, and on Typhoons you can only drive along roads with bridges. And it is not clear, its capacity for the squad is excessive (10 fighters), for a platoon - small (35-40 fighters). What is his concept of combat use, who will explain.
  18. siberalt
    siberalt 19 May 2014 19: 22
    0
    Yes! Pride in the homeland is worth a lot. To the people, of course. One pity that the government is not popular.
    Today we have a meeting of residents (about 15 women of nonworking age) in the courtyard of the Khrushchev five-story building. And I am two pensioners, and a neighbor from another entrance. No, it has nothing to do with amateur performance. The guys from the manager decided to earn extra money on the next divorce for suckers on the blind area of ​​the house at the expense of fees for major repairs. My objection - first, report on the "Medvedev" law for three years on the use of our funds, prolonged the violent reaction, in a loud manner: why are you smoking all over the street from the representative of the Criminal Code. Women-permanent participants, as it were, meetings of all tenants were in the east "orge", and the question, as usual, was hushed up. I looked at the paper called "estimate for ...". And I realized that those who made it have no idea about the estimate. The usual thief calculation. and also on ... And everyone who has to pay for it.
    But we have more important issues of the neighboring state. Allow me to take my leave and I'm sorry! hi
  19. Zauralec
    Zauralec 19 May 2014 19: 36
    0
    I really like to watch parades on the Red Square, something like that rises in my chest, I feel the strength of our great ancestors that persists in us.
    1. bandabas
      bandabas 20 May 2014 05: 39
      0
      The main thing is that they stopped sitting on the chairs when taking the Parade.
  20. Pattor
    Pattor 20 May 2014 02: 35
    0
    KBM is related to Chrysanthemum, the main developer (recipient of money). And the whole assembly and configuration of Saratov. She was finished in Saratov with allies. The troops have a complex - 3 batteries are the truth of everything. Parade cars are still unknown where they will go, so far to the base in Bryansk.
    Well, let’s mention Ukraine - there has been no equipment for half a year from the allies for the complex. Searches for replacements are underway (TK issued and counterparts seem to be found).
  21. Negative
    Negative 21 May 2014 09: 29
    0
    Quote: Dimsan
    Well, at least someone will reveal the secret. Well, why does the army need Thor ???? Out of curiosity, I found information on the Thor and on the Shell in the search engine.
    Thor:
    Affected area:
    range: from 1 to 15 km
    in height: from 0,01 to 10 km
    exchange rate parameter: 8 km
    Reaction time, s: 4,8
    Max. target speed 700 m / s
    The number of simultaneously fired targets: 4
    Maximum missile overload: 30 g
    SAM flight speed 700..800 m / s
    Minimum ESR of the target is 0,05 m² [18]
    Guidance system anti-jamming radio command
    The number of target channels 4 channels
    The number of missiles in a combat vehicle 8 missiles
    Shell:
    Type: two-stage supersonic solid fuel
    Guidance: Radio Command
    Speed ​​(maximum / average at a distance of 18 km): 1300 / 700 m / s [3]
    Max Target Speed: 1000 m / s
    Range to target: 1,2 km - 20 km
    Target Altitude: 15 m - 15 km
    Length: 3,2 m
    Caliber: 170 / 90 mm [4]
    Weight (without / with TPK): 74,5 / 94 kg
    Type of warhead: rod
    Warhead weight: 20 kg
    Weight BB warhead: 5.5 kg

    In all respects, the Shell is better, then what's the point in the Torah ??? By the way, on the caterpillar chassis the Shell also

    it’s not clear what the cons are, because a fair question is why. If the performance characteristics of one are higher than the other and the purpose is the same
  22. Serg93
    Serg93 30 May 2014 01: 04
    0
    It's nice to look at the parade))) Pride takes over the country !!! wink
  23. Adelman
    Adelman 4 June 2014 19: 43
    0
    Good things.
  24. GHOST29RUS
    GHOST29RUS 9 July 2014 18: 47
    0
    A new technique is always good, especially if it can come in handy later.