To answer these questions, it is necessary to give the correct definitions of occurring phenomena. To do this, it is necessary to highlight their key components, based on facts. Facts are known to all: President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the Association Agreement with the EU, after which the US and its NATO allies physically removed him from power, staging a violent coup d'état in Kiev and bringing the government to them illegitimate (hereinafter - junta ). The fact that the purpose of this aggression is the adoption of this agreement is evidenced by its sudden signing by the EU leaders with the junta a month after it seizes power. It was signed, according to them (the document with signatures has not yet been published! - SG), was the political part of this agreement, according to which Ukraine undertakes to follow EU foreign and defense policy, to participate, under the leadership of the European Union, in resolving regional civil and armed conflicts . After that, the adoption of the entire agreement becomes a technical issue.
In essence, what happened means forcibly subordinating Ukraine to the European Union - in other words, euro-occupation. EU leaders who obsessively teach us law-abiding and principles of the rule of law, flouting all norms of law, sign an illegitimate agreement with an illegitimate government. Yanukovych was overthrown because he refused to sign it.
But his refusal is explained not only by substantive considerations, but also by the fact that he did not have the legal right to do this, since this agreement contradicts the Ukrainian Constitution, which does not provide for the transfer of the sovereign rights of the state to another party.
According to the Ukrainian Constitution, to sign an international agreement that contradicts it, you first need to change the Constitution. The junta set by the EU leaders ignored this demand. From this it follows that the US and the EU organized the overthrow of the legitimate authority of Ukraine in order to deprive it of political independence. In the next step, they will impose on Ukraine the trade and economic policy they need by signing the economic part of the Agreement. And, although, unlike the occupation of Ukraine in 1941, the current eurococcupation is taking place without the invasion of foreign troops, its coercive nature is not in doubt. Just as the fascists deprived the population of Ukraine-occupied all civil rights, the current junta and the United States and the EU behind it treat opponents of European integration as criminals, indiscriminately accusing them of separatism and terrorism, throwing them into jails and simply shooting the hands of Nazi militants.
As long as President Yanukovych agreed to sign an agreement on the association of Ukraine with the European Union, he was courting himself in every way and praising high-ranking officials and politicians of the EU. But as soon as he refused, the American agents of influence (directly the American authorities in the person of the US ambassador, deputy head of the US State Department, secret service officers), together with European politicians, immediately began to persecute him, at the same time extolling his political opponents. They also provided massive information, political and financial assistance to Euromaidan, making it a springboard for the coup d'état. Many protest actions, including criminal attacks on law enforcement officers, the seizure of administrative buildings, accompanied by the killings and beatings of many people, were supported, organized and planned with the participation of the American Embassy, European officials and politicians who not only "interfered" in the internal affairs of Ukraine, but waged aggression against her with the hands of the Nazi militants they had grown.
The use of Nazis and religious fanatics in the interests of undermining political stability in various regions of the world is a favorite way of American intelligence services, which they practice against Russia in the Caucasus, in Central Asia, and now in Eastern Europe. The Eastern Partnership program, initiated by them with the Poles and European officials, was initially aimed against Russia in order to detach the former Soviet republics from it. This separation should be legally secured by the creation of associations of these states with the EU, for the political justification of which Russophobia and the mythology about the European choice were injected. The latter is artificially contrasted with Eurasian integration, which is falsely presented by Western politicians and the media as the restoration of the USSR.
In none of the former Soviet republics, the Eastern Partnership program was unsuccessful. Belarus has already made its choice by creating a Union State with Russia. The same applies to Kazakhstan, which formed the Customs Union with Russia and Belarus. Armenia and Kyrgyzstan have decided to join it. Gagauzia refused to accept Russophobia as the basis of the Moldovan policy, holding a referendum on the same and calling into question the legitimacy of the European choice of Chisinau. The only republic that made a relatively legitimate decision to establish an association with the EU - Georgia - paid for the European choice with its leadership of a part of the territory inhabited by those who disagree to live under the Euro-occupation by citizens. The same scenario is being imposed on Ukraine today - the loss of a part of the territory with citizens who do not accept the European choice of their leadership.
Forcing Ukraine to associate with the EU is mixed up on Russophobia as a reaction of the wounded Ukrainian public consciousness to the decision of the Crimeans to reunite with Russia. Since the majority of Ukrainians still do not share themselves with Russia, they are imposed on the perception of this episode as the aggression of Russia, which annexed a part of their territory. Brzezinski spoke about this threat, arguing about the Finlandization of Ukraine in order to anesthetize the brain of our political elite during the American operation to cut off Ukraine from historical Russia. Under this anesthesia, we are charged with guilt for the mythical oppression of the Ukrainian people, and the latter with hate in Russia, with which he allegedly fought for Little and New Russia.
The current anti-Russian hysteria of the Ukrainian media, striking with its frantic Russophobia, seems only to a superficial observer as a spontaneous reaction to the Crimean drama. In fact, this is evidence of the transition of the war against Russia into the open phase. For two decades, we have been condescending to the manifestations of Ukrainian Nazism, not attaching importance to it due to the lack of objective premises for it. However, their absence was fully compensated by the consistent incitement of hatred of Russia by sponsoring the activities of numerous nationalist organizations. At the same time, the inconsistency of the ideology of the latter with historical reality does not in any way confuse their Fuhrer, who for a small fee of sponsors from NATO member countries indiscriminately draw the image of the enemy from Russia. Since, taking into account the common history, language and culture (Kiev is the mother of Russian cities, the Kiev Pechersk Lavra is the main shrine of the Orthodox world, and the Kiev Mohyla Academy is the place where the Russian language is formed), this looks inconclusive, a frenzied lie is used to beat the tragic episodes of a common history (revolution and civil war, famine) as the arbitrariness of the Russian authorities. Russophobia, based on Nazism, becomes the basis of Ukrainian national identity.
Within the framework of this article, there is no need to expose the objective absurdity of the hysterical Russophobia of the Ukrainian Nazis, it is more important to establish the reason for their revival in the 21st century. To do this, we must remember that this "Ukrainian Nazism" is an artificial product of the eternal enemies of the Russian world. Ukrainian Nazism cultivated from abroad has always been oriented against the Russians, against Moscow. Initially, Poland, which considered Ukraine to be its “borderland” and lined up its power vertical to control it. Then Austria-Hungary, which for a long time invested a lot of money in the promotion of Ukrainian separatism. During the Nazi occupation on this basis, Bandera and policemen showed up, who helped the German fascists in establishing their order in Ukraine, including punitive actions and stealing the population into slavery. And now their modern followers are doing the same thing - under the leadership of American instructors, militants from the Bandera-based "Right Sector" carry out a punitive operation against the residents of Donbass, help the junta staged by the Americans to "clean up" the cities of Ukraine from the supporters of integration with Russia, pro-american anti-russian order.
Obviously, without the consistent support of the US and the EU, neither a coup d'etat, nor the present existence of the Kiev junta would be possible. Unfortunately, "history teaches that it does not teach anything." This is a misfortune for Europe, which has repeatedly encountered the proto-fascist model of power, which was formed in Ukraine. This is a symbiosis of the Nazis and the big bourgeoisie. It was this symbiosis that gave rise to Hitler, who was supported by the big German bourgeoisie, tempted by the possibility of making money on state orders and militarization of the economy under the guise of national-socialist rhetoric. And not only German, but also American, and European. Almost all European countries and the United States cooperated with the Hitler regime.
Few people understood that after the flare processions the Auschwitz furnaces would appear, and tens of millions of people would die in the flames of world war. Now the same thing is happening in Kiev, only instead of "Heil Hitler!" shout "Glory to the heroes!", the main feat of which is the execution of defenseless Jews in Babi Yar. At the same time, the Ukrainian oligarchs, including the leaders of Jewish organizations, finance the anti-Semites and the Nazis of the right sector, which constitute the power base of the current Ukrainian government. Maidan sponsors have forgotten that in the symbiosis of the Nazis and the big bourgeoisie, the Nazis always crush the liberal businessmen. The latter have to either become Nazis themselves or leave the country. This is already happening in Ukraine: the oligarchs who remain there compete with the Fuhrer of the right sector in Russophobic and anti-Moskal rhetoric, as well as in appropriating the property of the former Nazi sponsors who escaped to Moscow.
The current Kiev rulers are counting on the "roof" of their American and European patrons, daily taking their oath to fight the Russian "occupation" until the last Moskal. They clearly underestimate the dangers of the Nazis, who seriously consider themselves to be the "highest race", and all others, including the businessmen who sponsor them, to be "nonhumans" against whom any form of violence can be applied. Therefore, in the symbiosis of the Nazis and the big bourgeoisie, the Nazis always win, and the bourgeoisie is always then forced to submit or emigrate. There is no doubt that if Bandera is not stopped by force, then the Nazi regime in Ukraine will develop, expand, penetrate deeper and deeper. Doubt remains with regard to the European choice of Ukraine, which is increasingly giving in to the fascist spirit of eighty years ago.
Of course, modern Euro-fascism is very different from its German, Italian or Spanish versions of the last century. European national states are a thing of the past, having entered the European Union and submitted to European bureaucracy. The latter became the leading political force in Europe, easily suppressing claims to the sovereignty of European states. This force is not in the army, but in a monopoly on the issuance of money, the mass media and the regulation of trade, which are carried out by the European bureaucracy in the interests of large European capital. In all conflicts with the national states of the last decade, the European bureaucracy invariably emerged victorious, imposing its technical governments and its policies on European nations. The latter is based on the consistent denial of all national traditions, ranging from the norms of Christian morality and ending with sausage products.
Universal asexual and unprincipled Europolitics little resemble the possessed Fuhrer of the Third Reich. What they have in common is only a manic confidence in their own right and readiness to force people to obey. Although the forms of this coercion have become much softer in modern eurofascists, the methodology remains harsh. It does not tolerate dissent and permits the use of force up to the physical extermination of those who disagree with the policies of Brussels. Of course, the thousands who died in the struggle for planting "European values" in Yugoslavia, Georgia, Moldova, and now in Ukraine can not be compared with the millions of victims of the German fascist invaders in World War II. But who counted indirect human losses - from the spread of homosexuality and drug addiction, the ruin of national industries, the degradation of culture? Whole European nations are disappearing today in the crucible of European integration.
Fascism in Italian fascio means union, union. In the modern sense, it is an association without preserving the identity of integrable objects: people, social groups, countries. The current Euro-fascists are striving to destroy not only national economic and cultural differences, but also the individual diversity of people, including gender and age differentiation. At the same time, the aggressiveness with which the euro-fascists are fighting to expand their space sometimes reminds the paranoia of the Nazis, who are anxious to conquer living space for the Aryan superman. Suffice it to recall the hysteria of European politicians on the Maidan and in the Ukrainian media. They justified the crimes of the supporters of European integration and indiscriminately accused those who disagree with the European choice of Ukraine in full accordance with the Goebbels methodology, which proceeded from the principle: the more monstrous the lies, the more it resembles the truth.
The main engine of modern Euro-fascism is the European bureaucracy, directed from Washington. The United States strongly supports the expansion of the EU and NATO to the East, regarding them as the most important components of their global empire. US control over the EU is carried out through supranational institutions that have subjugated the national EU member states. Deprived of sovereignty in the field of economic, financial, foreign and defense policy, they are subject to the directives of the European Commission, which are adopted under strict US pressure.
In essence, the EU is a bureaucratic empire that formats its economic space in the interests of US-European capital under US control. Like any empire, it seeks to expand, the instrument of which is to draw the neighboring countries into association with the EU and transfer their sovereignty to the European Commission. To coerce these countries into becoming a colony of the EU, they use the ideology of fear of external threat, in which the American-controlled media draws the image of an aggressive and hostile Russia. Under this pretext, immediately after the collapse of the USSR, the EU and NATO occupied Eastern European countries, organizing a war in the Balkans. The next victims of European fascism were the Baltic republics, forced to join the Russophobic Nazis. Then, Euro-fascism overwhelmed Georgia, in which the Nazis, led by the United States, launched a civil war. Today, the Georgian experience is used by the Eur-fascists in Ukraine in order to force it to associate with the EU as a controlled territory and a springboard for an offensive against Russia.
The main threat to the implementation of its plans to establish control of the European bureaucracy over the post-Soviet space, the United States considers the Eurasian integration process, successfully developing around the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. To prevent Ukraine from participating in this process, the US and the EU have invested at least 10 billion to create networks of anti-Russian influence. In parallel, relying on the Polish and Baltic Russophobes, as well as on the media controlled by American media tycoons, the United States incited European officials against Russia in order to isolate the former Soviet republics from the Eurasian integration process. The Eastern Partnership program they engendered became a cover for aggression against Russia in the post-Soviet space. This aggression is carried out in the form of coercion of the post-Soviet states to the association with the EU, under which they transfer the sovereign functions of trade and economic, foreign and defense policy of the European Commission.
The meaning of the association agreement with the European Union for Ukraine is to transfer to Brussels the sovereign functions of regulating trade, foreign economic activity, technical regulation, veterinary, sanitary and phytosanitary control, as well as opening the market for European goods. In this agreement, the EU directives are painted on a thousand pages, which Ukraine undertakes to comply with. Each section states that the legislation of Ukraine must be unilaterally brought into line with the requirements of Brussels. At the same time, Ukraine’s obligations to comply with the Brussels directives concern not only the standards in force today, but also future ones, in the development of which Ukraine will not take any part.
Simply put, after the signing of the Agreement, Ukraine becomes a colony of the European Union, blindly submitting to all its requirements. Including those that Ukrainian industry can not perform and which are detrimental to the economy of Ukraine. It fully opens its market for European goods, which leads to an increase in imports of 4 billion dollars and the crowding out of non-competitiveness of Ukrainian industry. It should reach European standards, for which 150 billion euros are required to invest in the modernization of the economy, the sources of which are missing. The calculations made by Ukrainian and Russian economists suggested that after signing the Agreement, Ukraine will face worsening of the already deficient trade and payment balances and, as a result, default.
Thus, the signing of an association agreement would mean an economic disaster for Ukraine. At the same time, the EU would gain a certain benefit in expanding the market for its goods and acquiring depreciated Ukrainian assets. American corporations got shale gas deposits, which they want to supplement with pipeline infrastructure and TVEL market for nuclear power plants. The main goal is geopolitical - after the signing of the Agreement, Ukraine could not have become a member of the Customs Union with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. To achieve this goal, the US and the EU went to commit aggression against Ukraine, organizing an armed seizure of power by their proteges. Blaming Russia for the annexation of the Crimea, they captured the whole of Ukraine by establishing the power of the junta under their control. Its task is to deprive Ukraine of sovereignty and its submission to the EU through the signing of the Association Agreement.
Thus, the catastrophe committed in Ukraine, in fact, can be defined as the aggression of the United States and its NATO allies against Russia. This is a modern version of Euro-fascism, which differs from its previous incarnation of the Second World War, the use of "soft" power with elements of the armed forces when absolutely necessary, and the use of Nazism as a complementary, rather than total ideology. At the same time, the defining feature of Euro-fascism remains - the division of citizens into full-fledged (adhering to the European choice) and inferior, who should not have rights to their opinion and in respect of which everything is permissible, as well as the willingness to use violence and commit crimes against political opponents. It remains only to understand the motives of the moving forces of resuscitation of fascism in Europe, without which it is impossible to develop a plan of resistance and saving the Russian world from yet another threat of Euro-occupation.
In the theory of long-term economic development, the relationship of long-wave conjuncture with fluctuations of military-political tensions is noted. Periodically occurring change in the dominant technological order is mediated by economic depressions, the output of which is stimulated by increasing government spending. The latter are concentrated in the military-industrial complex, since within the framework of the liberal ideology, the strengthening of the role of the state is allowed only for national security purposes. Therefore, in order to substantiate the expediency of the growth of these expenses, military-political tensions are injected and international conflicts are provoked. Actually, this is happening at the present time - the US is trying to resolve the re-accumulated economic, financial and industrial disparities at the expense of other countries by escalating international conflicts in order to write off debts, misappropriate foreign assets and weaken geopolitical competitors. So it was during the Great Depression in the 30 of the last century, which caused the Second World Wave. A similar role was played by the Star Wars doctrine, implemented by the United States in order to get out of the 70 depression.
The US aggression against Ukraine pursues all the goals listed above. First, through economic sanctions, write off your obligations to Russia, which amount to hundreds of billions of dollars. Second, assign the state assets of Ukraine, including the gas transmission system, mineral deposits, gold reserves, the values of art and culture. Third, seize the Ukrainian markets for nuclear fuel, airplanes, energy, etc. that are important for American corporations. Fourth, weaken not only Russia but also the EU, whose economic damage from economic sanctions against Russia is estimated at a trillion dollars. At the same time write off part of their obligations to European countries. Fifth, to draw capital from European countries to itself, stimulating its flight from instability.
Thus, the war in Ukraine for the United States is a business. According to media reports, they have already paid for their expenses for the Maidan and Orange Revolutions, taking Ukrainian treasures out of the plundered Russian and Historical museums, capturing gas deposits and forcing the Ukrainian government to replace Russian TVELs with American ones in Ukrainian NPPs. Additionally, they decided to carry out the task of separating Ukraine from Russia for a long time, turning the former Little Russia into a state hostile to Russia in order to prevent its participation in the Eurasian integration process.
Based on this analysis, there is no doubt about the long-term and consistent nature of American aggression against Russia in Ukraine. They orient their Kiev puppets to increase, not decrease, the escalation of the conflict. At the same time, they incite the Ukrainian military against Russia with the aim of drawing the Russian army into a military conflict against Ukraine. They encourage the Nazis to new fighting. We are dealing with a real war, organized by the United States and its NATO allies. It is led, like 75 years ago, by Euro-Fascists against Russia using specially grown Ukrainian Nazis.
Surprising is the position of European states, which lag behind in the USA, provoking escalation of conflict by their inaction. Who, if not they, should understand that the Nazis can only be stopped by force. The sooner this is done, the fewer the casualties and destruction in Europe. The avalanche of US-organized wars in North Africa, the Middle East, the Balkans and now Ukraine threatens Europe above all, at the expense of which the American economic miracle occurred during the two world wars of the last century. But the Old World will not endure a third war. To prevent it, you need international recognition of US actions as aggression, and the US and EU officials who unleash them - as war criminals. It is important to give a legal definition of this aggression as Euro-fascism and to condemn the actions of European politicians and officials involved in the reanimation of Nazism under the guise of "Eastern Partnership".