Staff appointments of President Vladimir Putin, or Concrete to strengthen the vertical and statehood

8
The Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation marks the anniversary. Staff Manager Vladimir Putin congratulated on the official website with this significant date. From the letter of the president:

Over the past years, the Office of Affairs has been formed as a large, multi-disciplinary department that has significantly strengthened its potential, professional and human resources. And today - shows an example of successful, effective work.


I am confident that your creative potential, experience, and loyalty to professional traditions will continue to serve the interests of the Fatherland.


Staff appointments of President Vladimir Putin, or Concrete to strengthen the vertical and statehood


At the same time, during the week, Vladimir Putin made a substantial correction of the human resource mentioned by him, dismissed the head of the Administrative Department of President Vladimir Kozhin, who held this post for about 14 years, and appointed the former head of administration “B” of the security service of President Alexander Kolpakov to this position. Kozhin got a job as an adviser to the president, which in fact has far less significance, although theoretically it is considered to be of higher status.

Rotation in the leadership of the Presidential Affairs Department is not the only personnel change that the head of state personally made the other day. Vladimir Putin decrees replaced presidential plenipotentiaries in two federal districts at once. In the North Caucasus Federal District, the president has been represented by Sergey Melikov since the beginning of this week. Nikolai Rogozhkin became the plenipotentiary in the Siberian Federal District.

The similarity of these appointments is that both Melikov and Rogozhkin are people from a military cage. A native of the city of Michurinsk of the Tambov Region, Nikolai Rogozhkin was the Commander-in-Chief of the Interior Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for almost 10 years. Instead of Nikolai Rogozhkin, the post of commander-in-chief of the MVD of the Russian Federation was occupied by Colonel-General Viktor Zolotov, whose professionalism is well known to the president due to the fact that Zolotov worked in the FSO and served as head of the presidential guard. It is noted that Viktor Zolotov is a representative of the closest circle of President Vladimir Putin.

And Sergey Melikov is directly related to the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Until recently, he commanded a joint group of troops for the KTO in the North Caucasus and served as first deputy commander of the regional command of the Russian Interior Ministry in the North-Pacific Military District.

All these appointments can not be called the usual coincidence. The president places people on very significant posts whose principles of work are well known to him. An important aspect here is that the posts of the president’s representatives were occupied by people in uniform - and those who are well aware of the responsibility placed on them. Obviously, such a move is aimed at strengthening the vertical of power - although the term gives it with stamps, but this does not reduce the role of the vertical itself.

Why is the strengthening (reformatting) of the power “facilities” happening now, and why did it take to “drive” new “piles” into the foundation? One of the reasons is the current situation around Russia, around the spectrum of state interests. The authorities are forced to respond to the pressure that foreign “partners” are already putting on, and which they are still preparing to apply.

Here is one example. About two months ago, then-President of the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Kozhin turned out to be one of those statesmen of the country who were on the Western sanctions list. From the narrow-minded point of view, it seems to be a trifle, but from the point of view of the optimal functioning of the state apparatus, apparently, it is a trifle. And here it was necessary to make a knight's move, which (move) 12 of May was demonstrated by the head of state: there is Kozhin - there are sanctions, no Kozhin - there are no sanctions ...

Vladimir Kozhin was transferred to a very comfortable position, which allows him to have a lot of room for maneuver, but at the same time, he was fenced off the screen from the scrutiny of Western “friends” of Russia. In such a situation, these most Western "friends" automatically become the status of the catch-up. They will either have to gradually forget about their own sanctions against the same Kozhin, or, exposing themselves from a very comical side, transfer the sanctions from the former head of the Presidential Administration to the current head or announce sanctions against any official whose name emerges when studying government contacts Vladimir Putin.

There is another side to new appointments. This side looks mediated, but this fact does not diminish its essential role. This is a game ahead of the curve. “Partners”, who, after Syria and the Crimea, are beginning to gradually realize that it’s impossible to take Russia with bare hands, are clearly looking for a recipe to shake the situation inside the country. For such a swinging, a new US ambassador may start work in Moscow soon. Why precisely for rocking? Yes, because American diplomats sent to Russia are not trained a priori ...
According to the American newspaper New York TimesJohn Tefft, who is widely known for the fact that during his work in various countries, very dramatic events took place in diplomatic posts in these countries (or events whose drama concerned the neighbors of these states) may turn out to be Michael McFaul's changer in Moscow. Moreover, these events began to manifest themselves precisely when Mr. Tefft had been in the diplomatic service in this country for several years or immediately after his departure from the country.

For example:

Tefft was deputy chief of the US diplomatic mission in Russia from 1996 to 1999. Events: 1998 default, militant invasion of Dagestan in 1999.

Tefft from 2000 to 2003 - US Ambassador to Lithuania. Event: NATO expansion at the expense of the Baltic republics.

Tefft from 2005 to 2009 was the US ambassador to Georgia. Event: Saakashvili's aggression in South Ossetia in 2008.

Tefft from 2009 to 2013 - US Ambassador to Ukraine. Event: Maidan, which led to a coup and a lot of blood.

What an entertaining coincidence? .. But is it a coincidence? ..

There is an opinion that the “partners” will implement the recipes of loosening the situation in Russia into reality and through the US envoy (Tefft or not Tefft). The West has not yet invented anything new, and therefore it is worth expecting another clumsy provocations not without the help of the internal Russian “Maidanophiles”, whom the mentioned gentleman is obviously called to gather into “one fist”. So that with the "fist" everything was very, very difficult, the Russian authorities could easily go to the maneuver with the appointment of those people to the positions indicated above, which, as they say, are their own for the president. Someone will call this step the strengthening of an authoritarian note in the Russian statehood, and someone will call it a common desire to strengthen the state itself, for which many of the “partners” have a “Oriental-Oriental” canine ...
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    15 May 2014 08: 44
    Cadres decide everything. Any actions aimed at strengthening the rule of law in Russia are welcome.
    1. +17
      15 May 2014 08: 51
      Someone will call this step the strengthening of an authoritarian note in Russian statehood, while someone will call the usual desire to strengthen the state itself,

      So then it is so ... But when will the line reach Medvedev? That would be a real strengthening of the state ...
      1. +10
        15 May 2014 09: 01
        Quote: MIKHAN
        But when will the line reach Medvedev?

        But what about Serdyukov and Vasiliev?
        Already got seats in the Federation Council?
        1. +14
          15 May 2014 09: 15
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          But what about Serdyukov and Vasiliev?
          Already got seats in the Federation Council?

          Half of Putin’s team does not shine with professionalism, and some deserve a free ticket to a sanatorium on the banks of the Kolyma. I hope these personnel shifts will improve things.
        2. +5
          15 May 2014 09: 21
          This is Putin so playing chess with the Americans laughing
          1. -6
            15 May 2014 10: 35
            Quote: ZU-23
            This is Putin so playing chess with the Americans

            Rather, with us .....
            1. Eugeniy_369k
              0
              15 May 2014 14: 37
              Quote: nycsson
              Rather, with us .....

              But are you minus the fact that a person expressed his position, or that we have one line of the party? Who does not agree the enemy of the people, the national traitor, Bendera (emphasize necessary)?
              Concrete for strengthening vertical and statehood

              What concrete? Our president hangs out the same deck. The castles are continuous. The personnel bench comes out small.
              1. +4
                15 May 2014 19: 26
                And whoever minuses - he also expresses his position! "Or that we have one party line?"
      2. +1
        15 May 2014 12: 02
        If you look at how often the president meets with ministers, we can assume that Medvedev is a "wedding general"
    2. 225chay
      +3
      15 May 2014 10: 10
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Cadres decide everything. Any actions aimed at strengthening the rule of law in Russia are welcome.


      Everything would be fine, but here Kuznetsova ...
      and to the North Caucasus ??
      Is it a fortification?
      There Khlaponin has already "strengthened" ...
      1. Zenturion77
        +2
        15 May 2014 10: 27
        What Kuznetsov, when Sergei Melikov (Lezgin by nationality) is appointed to the North Caucasus Federal District. I hope that he, as a representative of the Caucasian nationality, will be able to work constructively in the Caucasus.
        1. 225chay
          0
          15 May 2014 11: 13
          Quote: Zenturion77
          What Kuznetsov, when Sergei Melikov (Lezgin by nationality) is appointed to the North Caucasus Federal District. I hope that he, as a representative of the Caucasian nationality, will be able to work constructively in the Caucasus.

          And look carefully at Kuznetsov and where he is going.
          About Melikov, we ourselves know
      2. +1
        15 May 2014 15: 06
        Quote: 225chay
        Kuznetsova ...
        and to the North Caucasus ??
        Is it a fortification?
        There is hlaponin

        This is the lowering of the FIG Norilsk Nickel, which takes the position of "world patriotism", i.e. patriotism for the Anglo-Saxons at the expense of Russia and on the bones of Russia. Instead of strengthening the named group with the post of the Minister of Sports of Russia or the chairmanship of the Central Council of DOSAAF of Russia, it was launched into a poisoned (eaten away) clearing under the supervision of Caucasian comrades)). A move worthy of a grandmaster.
    3. +13
      15 May 2014 10: 26
      Watch on the screens of the country "The Expendables"
      1. jjj
        +3
        15 May 2014 11: 50
        For some reason, they forgot Sergei Kuzhugetovich, Valery Vasilievich, Alexander Vasilievich, Mikhail Efimovich
    4. -10
      15 May 2014 10: 30
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Cadres decide everything. Any actions aimed at strengthening the rule of law in Russia are welcome.

      In this regard, I recall the speech of the clown Fedorov about the Russian occupation! wassat
      1. +18
        15 May 2014 11: 23
        All the clowns have long been chatting about that Omerika is a friend. There is no occupation, the NSA does not follow us, Our national ruble - and other nonsense. But Fedorov, unlike clowns, is a professional who has been in this field for more than a dozen years, pushes through normal laws in the style of banning GMOs, nationalizing the Ruble, and so on. He visited the war in Afghanistan. (officer) (I am 100% sure that if he set out to slope, he would find an opportunity, but he went to war)

        What did you do? Nixon. Well, besides the fact that you whimper from time to time about our hellish power and that it’s time to do a revolution, since Serdyukov is not sitting?

        Did you go to war 08.08.08? Or soaked in the Wahhabi outhouses? I think that during your life there were at least 3 wars in which our country participated. Maybe you are a Hero of Russia? Well, if he called the officer a clown, banter of the President and so on?

        Well, comments in the style of - LITTLE, LONG, ROLLBACK, CORRUPTION and blah blah blah.

        After the Maidan - whining clowns in the country cause a strong burning sensation at the fifth point. I want to send them faster to Kolyma. Together with Serdyukov and Makarevich.

        Clown Fedorova calls Navalny and Novodvorskaya - you have a good company. Your thoughts are in unison. Does it bother you? Although what am I talking about. This is normal :)

        And Putin does not have to joke, unlike you, who made exactly "0" on a national scale - he did a great job. You can already erect a monument to him during his lifetime. It just bothers you. Especially when you look in the mirror)
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. -2
          15 May 2014 14: 04
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          There is no occupation

          We look at the meaning of the term "occupation".
          In particular, occupation presupposes the presence of occupying forces and an occupation administration.
          Can you name the troops, except for the RF Armed Forces, in the country? Do you know any government administration that is not the government of the Russian Federation?
          Therefore, the one who invented and promotes the postulate "Russia in occupation" is not just a clown but a liar and a provocateur, and those who believe him are either sincerely mistaken, or simply fools, or are themselves demagogues like Federov
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          .
          Fedorov .... - a professional,

          Yeah .... Chubais is also a professional. And Kudrin, and Gref, and Zurabov, and Golikov, and Siluanov, and Nabiulin ... And what kind of professionals Rotenberg and Timchenko ...
          Suppose that St. Petersburg politician Evgeny Alekseevich Fedorov, who left the electoral bloc of the Russian movement for democratic reforms, whose leaders were A. Yakovlev, E. Shevarnadze, A. Sobchak, G.Kh. Popov, - still changed his beliefs. It does not matter that he worked under the direction of A.B. Chubais, when he was the Minister of Finance, is now a member of the Board of Directors of the Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies "maybe Evgeny Alekseevich hates Anatoly Borisych in his soul." But let’s try to carefully analyze his speeches, the essence of which is reduced to the following scheme:

          1. The collapse of the USSR - this is a special operation of the United States, which they conducted through an agent of influence M. Gorbachev.

          2. "Russia was defeated," so the United States, as a winner, can do anything. Therefore, most of the assets are taken offshore, and all business in Russia is under the control and jurisdiction of the United States. "The winners write the rules, and the Americans write the winners": they behave with us in the same way as the USSR did with Germany, exporting material values, production and brains from the defeated country. Under their dictation, the State Duma makes all decisions.

          See continued
        5. +2
          15 May 2014 14: 04
          Read more.

          3. Fedorov shows that he is a “natural patriot”, owns an insider, for which, according to Fedorov himself, “is being persecuted” and at the same time declares: “Power is controlled through the mechanism of corruption, that is why corruption is an unsolvable problem today. The Americans forbade us to solve it. ” Those. officials-corrupt officials should not be touched (assuming that they will bomb us for this).

          4. Fedorov concludes his speech with the conclusion that the Americans are not enemies and that they must be endured: “This must be understood! No no! They are not enemies, but winners. This is their right - the right of the strong, the right of the winner! This cannot be broken in 10 or 20 years. There are countries that have been liberated from occupation for 500 years!».

          5. The only mistake the Americans, according to Fedorov, is the coming to power of V. Putin. Which took up the restoration of the country, but is constrained by the control of the winners hand and foot. For this, the West hates him and suits him “marsh” (why, under such universal control, the United States cannot remove its presumptuous Gauleiter - not reported).

          And further E. Fedorov denotes three ways out of the situation:
          - wait until the United States bends by itself ("500 years of occupation");
          - revolution (“A difficult process in which hundreds of thousands of people will die. Are we ready to sacrifice thousands of our people in the process of restoring sovereignty?”)
          - and war (and how do we fight the United States with their full control?).

          In this simple way, Evgeni Alekseevich brings the listener to the main point: the only thing we can do is surrender to Putin’s administration. But branding in words the dishonest privatization of the 90s and stating the loss of Russian sovereignty, in fact, he votes for Russia's accession to the WTO and campaigns for a new vaccination: "The future of state corporations is defined: according to the plans of the government, they will cease to exist after 2015. In fact, this will be a new “privatization”, however, this time on clear legal conditions and equal business access ... The experience of the transition of developed countries to a modern economy based on self-regulation of the economic sphere and a decrease in state participation in these processes generally indicates a positive trend in such transformations"*

          This analysis suggests that the punching of the liberal model takes place under the guise of statism and using pseudo-patriotic rhetoric. Thus, the Duma politician of the Yeltsin call, an employee of Anatoly Borisovich Chubais, in glasses and trousers, who votes for the WTO and privatization, learned to use ultra-patriotic words. Only the chain "we fought with the United States - We lost the war - We are an occupied country - Everything is lost - There is nothing to twitch - We must do what the Westerners order" commits a dialectic circle and finds himself in the same place as the positions of notorious liberals from the HSE


          http://voprosik.net/kto-takoj-evgenij-fedorov/
          1. +6
            15 May 2014 14: 54
            Than to read the yellow press, we would have watched Fedorov’s interview, where he was asked about Chubais. This information was first pulled by Latynina and some Olga (ala worked with Fedorov). After that, they began to copy-paste it on the sites of the white tape - owing that Fedorov near Chubais, they say, works for him and so on. Well, I didn’t read further) For I read this nonsense a year ago + I looked at what Fedorov answered - it was enough for me)

            Fedorov has 20 hours of video footage. Apparently you limited yourself to information from the site - QUESTION.NET))

            Well, the liberal Shushara talked about this as I repeated - about a year and a half ago) And all this was sorted out in the end.

            Navalny also noted. And each of the liberal party people barked at Fedorov. Better look for this information) than read - question. No)

            And in this "little piece" they very competently distort the words of Fedorov, think out for him and bring the reader to a bowl with a ready-made semi-finished product where there is some truth, which, as is known in small quantities, makes the dish look like the truth)

            But Fedorov always speaks clearly and clearly about Putin - Putin is the leader of the national liberation movement. He who has eyes, let him see.

            Well, for the blind, you should at least listen)
            1. -1
              15 May 2014 15: 27
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              ... would have watched Fedorov’s interview ..... Fedorov’s video footage is 20 hours. Apparently you limited yourself to information from the site - QUESTION.NET))


              My eyes and ears are not a toilet, so that any sagging balabol spoiled them with their demagogy lasting 20 hours.
              I don’t have to waste a day of my life digesting Fedorov’s stream of fabrications in order to understand who this character is.
              And no "Question No" Navalny, Novodvorskaya, Latynins and the liberal riffraff have nothing to do with it. They have their heads on their shoulders, and I have mine.
              I will repeat to you simple questions that you did not answer

              Quote: Normal
              Can you name the troops, except for the RF Armed Forces, in the country? Do you know any government administration that is not the government of the Russian Federation?


              If you do not answer (at least for yourself) these questions and do not know the meaning of the term "occupation" then you belong to the third category of citizens, namely
              Quote: Normal
              ... themselves are demagogues like Federov


              I cannot wish you success in your "work" in the field of lies and demagoguery
              hi
              1. +1
                15 May 2014 15: 35
                When the occupation was interpreted, there was still no Fed tool, neo-colonial US administration, and other shit. Times change.

                In order to occupy a country and bring it to its knees, it is not necessary to send troops. This is the last century. It is enough to print the dough and raise the "elite"

                Now everything is decided in a different plane. Do not fidget when everything is tasteful of what is at stake.

                Pretending to be a fool and nod at Ozhegov’s dictionary is not an option)


                AN OCCUPATION. Borrowing in the XIX century. from French. lang., where occupation <lat. occupatio "occupation, occupation", suf. derived from occupare "occupy, seize", pref. education from cupare "take, grab".

                Now think about it - grab, grab, borrow, grab.

                Have you heard anything about the building of the Federal Property Management Agency in the 90s? What kind of guards stood in front of the building and what language did they speak? How was our Minister not allowed into this building? The building where our oligarchs were "appointed". After 2 weeks the Minister "had" to leave.

                Remember the raider seizures of our defense enterprises into dashing and their subsequent destruction?

                Time changes, tactics change - the essence remains one. Subjugate and kneel. But I think that it’s useless to explain something to you)

                Question. No all matters)

                1. +2
                  15 May 2014 16: 13
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  When the occupation was interpreted, there was no Fed tool yet,

                  So call a spade a spade.
                  The occupation is one thing (despite the fact that the Fed did not have a machine then), and economic or financial dependence is completely different.
                  Fedorov, on the other hand, deliberately substitutes concepts (and therefore lies) in order to justify ANY actions of the authorities.
                  The fact is that the occupation occurs as a result of the invasion of the armed forces (the enemy (or supposedly an ally) whose resistance is not possible or suppressed. There is no and no invasion of the enemy armed forces and the occupation, and there is financial and economic dependence and this is a product of the activities of the former Russian authorities and their receivers who rule now. This dependence is justified by the occupation (I repeat; which IS NOT AND WASN'T) Fedorov.

                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  In order to occupy a country and bring it to its knees, it is not necessary to send troops. This is the last century. It is enough to print the dough and raise the "elite"

                  Now everything is decided in a different plane.


                  In order to understand something it is necessary to determine the terms, definitions and concepts.
                  Try to swap the definitions in real life, everyday life and very soon they will come for you from specialized honey. institutions.
                  Once again especially for you; in order to occupy the country you need to send troops. All! There is no other way in any plane. But in order to kneel politically, you really need to control the elite economically and financially.
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  Do not fidget when everything is tasteful of what is at stake.

                  "Everyone knows" is of course a strong argument.
                  It is worth saying this phrase and the opponent should be ashamed of his ignorance?
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  Pretending to be a fool and nod at Ozhegov’s dictionary is not an option)

                  Pretending to be a fool is the one who replaces the concept of mixing warm with smooth and thinks that "still in the know
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. +2
                  15 May 2014 16: 49
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  AN OCCUPATION. Borrowing in the XIX century. from French. lang., where occupation <lat. occupatio "occupation, occupation", suf. derived from occupare "occupy, seize", pref. education from cupare "take, grab".

                  So what? In the modern sense of the word, occupation is precisely the deployment of troops, power, armed capture. There is NO power grab and it was not.
                  There was and is the economic and financial dependence of the Russian Federation on the West, established as a result of actions, including the current authorities of the Russian Federation, which justifies Fedorov under the guise of a mythical occupation.
                  And if you use the literal meaning of borrowed words, then demagogy is
                  (Greek demagogia, from demos - people and ago - I lead), designation in ancient Greece of the position of leaders of political groups leading the people (demagogue - literally: the leader of the people),


                  But now we use this word in the meaning
                  based on a deliberate perversion of facts, the impact on feelings, instincts, people's consciousness, incitement of passions to achieve any, usually political, goals; grandiloquent reasoning, covering up any selfish goals.

                  That's exactly what Fedorov is doing, and you along with him.

                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  . But I think that it’s useless to explain something to you)

                  Question. No all matters)


                  It's easiest to joke (I can do that too, but I have no desire to troll). And you try to refute this analysis point by point. Do not cite Fedorov's heroic deeds here (political ones are very dubious and controversial, and in Afghanistan, as you know, there were practically ALL SA officers, many more than once, the "best defense minister" Grachev was also there), but argued that everything written about Fedorov in "Question No" - not true.
                  1. 0
                    15 May 2014 18: 59
                    Quote: Normal
                    The easiest way to joke

                    Hi Vova. I read your correspondence with him. What to say. He has a ton of noodles on his ears! laughing But seriously, our president currently has almost unlimited power in his hands. Peter 1 and Catherine in the next world envy him with white envy! wassatThe constitution should be read, not the clown Fedorov to listen, everything is written there. hi
                    1. +1
                      15 May 2014 19: 25
                      Quote: nycsson
                      Quote: Normal
                      The easiest way to joke

                      Hi Vova ....... The Constitution needs to be read, not the clown Fedorov to listen, everything is written there. hi

                      Great, Alex. Consent with Fedorov-like characters gives the illusion of a struggle of the people's liberation movement (led, of course, by the GDP) with occupation, warms the awareness of their involvement.
                      A constitution .... Oh, sorry there is no Yarosvet. That is who would simply break all Fedorov’s Duma feats and initiatives. With knowledge of the subject of the conversation would break. And I, unfortunately, do not have such knowledge.
                      1. 0
                        16 May 2014 00: 54
                        Quote: Normal
                        That is who would simply break all Fedorov’s Duma feats and initiatives.

                        Yes, I myself am not a deletant in this area! Recently I graduated from the graduate school in State Medical University. I know a little about sausage scraps! Read management theory. This is the science of science!
                4. +1
                  15 May 2014 20: 26
                  But Comrade Petrov remembers everything. Plus. It is necessary to tell the people more often about the past, but VV is still apparently ashamed to open the folder "Yeltsin's Times" for the people. And this people, who do not remember, have grown up in governing the country already, in positions, and believe in the "flow of radiant good from the West" We need the truth about Yeltsin and Gorbachev, and everyone who was with them, why are there still only miserable blathers of journalists , occasionally?
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +2
            16 May 2014 09: 57
            Quote: Normal
            And further E. Fedorov denotes three ways out of the situation:
            - wait until the United States bends by itself ("500 years of occupation");
            - revolution (“A difficult process in which hundreds of thousands of people will die. Are we ready to sacrifice thousands of our people in the process of restoring sovereignty?”)
            - and war (and how do we fight the United States with their full control?)

            Of course, the site contains the most unacceptable decisions that Fedorov speaks of. The main way is the popular decision to remove external governance and, as a result, change the constitution, nationalize the ruble, and liquidate the 5th column.
        6. Eugeniy_369k
          -2
          15 May 2014 14: 45
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          . And Fedorov, unlike clowns, is a professional,

          I saw a dispute between this "professional" with Delyagin, it was another show.
          Clown Fedorova calls Navalny and Novodvorskaya - you have a good company.

          The most "killer" argument laughing .This is the most relish to poke people, probably Fedorov profi taught hi .
          1. +2
            15 May 2014 15: 09
            the killer argument is articles from the site - question. no?)

            In fact - Fedorov was in Afghanistan, unlike the whole Shushary that barks at him. In fact - he is moving to the masses the law on the nationalization of the Central Bank.

            In fact - he was the first to publicly say that the Central Bank does not belong to the Russian Federation (when other people spoke about it (Zhirinovsky, Glazyev and others - there was no effect among the masses)), showed an article in the constitution and gave an example with the Coat of Arms.

            In fact - he was promoting a GMO ban bill

            In fact, he took part in the development of a bill banning officials from having property abroad.

            + bills on NGOs - it’s up to him (India later lent them to us)

            and so on) and the yellow articles are certainly good) you can laugh at the arguments further)

            And yes - the words of Navalny, Latynina and Novodvorskaya for me are a litmus test - my stranger. I am sure that these creatures are not with me in the same trench. Creatures bark at Fedorov - the logical chain is simple)

            Well, the fact that the words of Novodvorskaya and others do not raise your doubts is also an argument.
            1. 0
              15 May 2014 15: 23
              Z.Y. read your comments in general on the site - everything is clear) Have a nice day)

              1. Eugeniy_369k
                +2
                15 May 2014 15: 40
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                Have a nice day

                Have a nice one you too hi .
                Py.Sy. I do not agree with the current government in everything, but I express only my opinion, and you can call any media outlet "yellow press", even Channel One, it all depends on preferences.
                Well, the fact that the words of Novodvorskaya and others do not raise your doubts is also an argument.

                Starved laughing laughing laughing , I wrote somewhere that words of Novodvorskaya and others do not cause me doubts?
                Imagination played out? Have you come up with? Well, don’t wink , disseminate your mental abilities to yourself, you are our Sage, we will live our own little mind somehow.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. SLX
              SLX
              +3
              15 May 2014 22: 54
              Quote: c-Petrov
              In fact - Fedorov was in Afghanistan, unlike the whole Shushary that barks at him.


              There were Grachev, Lebed, Gromov ... Probably, there is no need to talk about the level of corruption with them. This is also a fact.

              There were also the chiefs of warehouses and canteens, now the gentlemen of military orders, staff, also not without awards ... And this is also a fact.

              Afghanistan has been a long time and now is not an indicator of moral and business qualities today.

              PS
              Yes, if Che, then I was there too, and in 1983-1985.

              Quote: c-Petrov
              In fact - he is moving to the masses the law on the nationalization of the Central Bank.


              Is he a financier? Then you need to ask the financiers how much this measure will help. According to the vast majority of them, it will not help. For the Central Bank is a very important, but only a small part of the financial system of the state.

              Quote: c-Petrov
              In fact - he was promoting a GMO ban bill


              Nothing that you, for example, eat bread from cereals genetically modified as a result of selection every day? Therefore, it is not necessary to adopt a populist law, but to invest a lot of money in a state program to study the consequences of the consumption of GMO products.

              Quote: c-Petrov
              In fact, he took part in the development of a bill banning officials from having property abroad.


              After that, all the officials became honest? Or switched to other and well-known ways to hide their income?

              Quote: c-Petrov
              + bills on NGOs - it’s up to him (India later lent them to us)


              Those. You firmly know that the initiation of the law, affecting the foreign policy of the state in a very serious way and in a very long term, did without Putin and without Lavrov? Do not share the source of your knowledge?

              Quote: c-Petrov
              etc)


              Do not, etc. Suffice it to compare his dubious "achievements" with the real achievements of Lavrov, Rogozin and even Shoigu.

              Quote: c-Petrov
              Well, the fact that the words of Novodvorskaya and others do not raise your doubts is also an argument.


              Lord, shouldn't I take Novodvorskaya's words seriously? Who is hindered today by this "city crazy", who is, in fact, an unhappy patient (including the whole head) and a lonely person?
          2. The comment was deleted.
        7. +1
          15 May 2014 18: 50
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          And Fedorov, unlike clowns, is a professional

          Laughing out loud! Of course a professional! By hanging noodles on ears like you! wassat
          I would like to upload some video material to you, but I just turned off this feature! Since I constantly post something uncomfortable ..... laughing Thank you for leaving the ability to embed images ...... wassat
      2. The comment was deleted.
    5. +5
      15 May 2014 12: 03
      Tefft from 2000 to 2003 - US Ambassador to Lithuania. Event: NATO expansion at the expense of the Baltic republics.

      Tefft from 2005 to 2009 was the US ambassador to Georgia. Event: Saakashvili's aggression in South Ossetia in 2008.

      Tefft from 2009 to 2013 - US Ambassador to Ukraine. Event: Maidan, which led to a coup and a lot of blood.


      Russia is too big for Tefft. She herself will digest it and lower it to the latrine. Example - McFaul laughing
  2. +8
    15 May 2014 08: 51
    It is high time to use your "power" potential to protect the country's own interests. Show the "fifth column" that this phrase can be easily transformed into a real column going through the stage to the Kolyma or Magadan (just as symbols).
    And with the ambassador do this:
    Upon arrival in Russia, announce that he is on our sanctions list and kick home in the ass. And organize an online broadcast for this.
    1. +6
      15 May 2014 11: 02
      Who will clean? Zotov? Faithful Elinist, then Sobchak or just an opportunist ?! Here he is on the tank protecting 1991 Eltsin.
      1. Eugeniy_369k
        +1
        16 May 2014 01: 18
        Quote: Orik
        Who will clean? Zotov?

        But he commanded the personal security of V.V. Putin, i.e. you can trust as yourself. I think this is all done under a project called "National Guard". And this structure will only obey the President of the Russian Federation.
  3. NIVH
    +10
    15 May 2014 08: 57
    Frames decide everything!
    1. Alex 241
      +21
      15 May 2014 08: 58
      Quote: NIVH
      Frames decide everything!
    2. +3
      15 May 2014 19: 13
      Quote: NIVH
      Frames decide everything!

      You have posted a picture of Stalin. No questions, he was saying everything correctly. Only this is not about our country. People or personnel are valuable in the country where industry is developed. They are needed there, because they work as turners, milling machines, welders, etc. And in our country people are an extra element. We are like a dog’s fifth leg. 85% of our budget revenues is the sale of oil, gas, etc. For this, a population of 10-20 millions would be enough in our country !!! And the rest is not the right ballast. So they are fighting us by hook or by crook. With the help of vodka, drugs, corruption, miserable pensions and salaries, fake drugs, etc. I forgot the most important thing - this is our minimum wage !!! Laughing out loud! laughing Something like this!
  4. 0
    15 May 2014 08: 58
    For more of this concrete in power !!!
    1. +2
      15 May 2014 14: 39
      Quote: Scandinavian
      For more of this concrete in power !!!


      The more "oaks" in the army, the stronger our defense!

      We would have more power in our minds, and here concrete instead of brains.
      1. +3
        15 May 2014 19: 05
        Quote: Normal
        We would have more power in our minds, and here concrete instead of brains.

        Well no! Everything is normal with their brains! Drive the whole country by the nose! wassat But morality is clearly not enough! They work in their own pocket, instead of defending the interests of the state. am
        1. Eugeniy_369k
          +3
          15 May 2014 21: 53
          Quote: nycsson
          Well no! Everything is normal with their brains! Drive the whole country by the nose! But morality is clearly not enough!

          I dare to assume that by morality you mean conscience.
          Today, conscience is a luxury and not only for those holding power sad ......
          1. +1
            16 May 2014 00: 57
            Quote: Eugeniy_369k
            I dare to assume that by morality you mean conscience.

            Morality is a broad concept! First of all, this is honesty, decency, love for the motherland, etc.
            1. Eugeniy_369k
              +1
              16 May 2014 01: 12
              I support unconditionally. Yes
  5. +4
    15 May 2014 08: 58
    If this leads to even greater strengthening of the country, then only for! If Vladimirich had reduced the bureaucracy, there would have been beauty!
    1. +7
      15 May 2014 09: 41
      Duck that's it. I watch news 24 and say "there will be a reduction in officials." There are 1.500.000 of them now. I suppose Vova got vague rumors that Pindos really want to fuck us. This is an ideal excuse to renew the country from the inside and cut the fifth column, which is power, with an ax. I hope that it will be so. And all the white tape worms will be alcoholized immediately after the parade in one.
    2. raf
      0
      15 May 2014 19: 31
      and for crimes committed by an official, a specific term, without any "conditional" there and on his zone, a bitch, on a zone and a place for him to determine, near the bucket!
  6. +6
    15 May 2014 09: 01
    Keep it up!
  7. +9
    15 May 2014 09: 05
    All this is good, if not for one thing. The stake is placed on individuals and the team, and this seems to be understandable, but when Putin and his people leave, a politician will come in his place, well, let not a traitor, but not so far-sighted or simply thinks that one can peacefully coexist with the West, remaining a great power , and then what? Repetition of 91? Or the 17th? How to make sure that the system does not cease to resist the activities of potential "partners" (not necessarily the United States and Western European countries), regardless of the "wishlist" of the next president? Otherwise, Gorbachev's syndrome will repeat itself sooner or later.
    1. pvn53
      +6
      15 May 2014 10: 02
      With such comments, one conclusion is that it’s better not to do anything, and all will be happy. And if you look objectively at what Putin has done and is doing recently, you can only wish him success, health and strength.
    2. pvn53
      0
      15 May 2014 10: 02
      With such comments, one conclusion is that it’s better not to do anything, and all will be happy. And if you look objectively at what Putin has done and is doing recently, you can only wish him success, health and strength.
      1. +1
        15 May 2014 11: 09
        Putin is not forever. And nothing can be done. Our "partners" do not stop in their activities.
    3. +2
      15 May 2014 10: 21
      Ancestral monarchy? Well, in modern realities, this is a nurtured receiver for years. Just the way I think.
      1. +3
        15 May 2014 11: 20
        Then the successor of this control all life. It's hard to say. I like it better in China. Again, constitutional monarchies are fairly stable systems. It seems to be. One thing is good - the understanding by the country's leadership of this problem. Putin once spoke out about Stalin, that that solution of too many issues turned over to himself, failing to ensure the continuity of his policies. Here's how to do it so that replacing the country's leaders, our path does not resemble a sine wave?
  8. +3
    15 May 2014 09: 08
    Outside the window, rain and hail - Putin is to blame!
    The cat left the kittens - Putin is to blame!
    The mistress left the bunny - guess who is guilty!
    Our Tanya is crying loudly - Putin is nearby, not otherwise!
    The light went out, the fence fell, did the motor die out?
    Healthy tooth removed il climbed into the apartment thief?
    Didn’t like the movie or did you enter shit?
    Any cataclysm has one explanation:
    Every democrat knows that Putin is to blame !!!
    Who yesterday in my porch lift to the ceiling?
    Believe me, comrades, this is Putin’s hand!
    I caught a "squirrel" drunk - this is Putin's trick!
    A pile of shit under the table is Putin's fault!
    The toilet is clogged - this is Putin’s order!
    He threw bull-calves there, poured water - and he was like that!
    At night, linen is stolen, glass is broken in our house,
    Dancing drunk in the courtyard ... this is Putin - a riffraff!
    Have neighbors Sabantuy? - who is the instigator? clear!
    There is no escape from the villain, obscene writes on the walls,
    Broke the bushes in the alley ... this is Putin - oh and oh!
    Liberala wets the rain - Putin laughs merrily ...
    Flooded your cottage? - This is Putin, not otherwise!
    Did you find a thunderstorm along the way? - then the Kremlin’s hand got!
    Cold, wind, snow - only Putin is to blame!
    Blowing down a hurricane? - Putin is taking revenge on rams!
    Storm, tsunami, flood? - This is Putin, no doubt!
    Rain, landslide, cyclone - of course, he is to blame!
    Sel, avalanche, rockfall? - Clearly, Putin is to blame!
    Tornado, typhoon, earthquake - there is no escape from Putin!
    A crow pecked at the crown? - This is a young friend of the riot police!
    Bees, wasps sting you? - This is Putin's SpetsNaz!
    See this bumblebee? - He is in the service of the Kremlin!
    IF BELIEVE IN SUCH - YOUR DIAGNOSIS: PARANOIA !!!
    1. +8
      15 May 2014 09: 41
      Spring has passed
      Summer has come
      Thanks to Putin for this.
  9. 0
    15 May 2014 09: 08
    The fact is that Tefft. worked in countries with weak government. so something came out of him, but everything is calm with us.
  10. +3
    15 May 2014 09: 08
    Quote: Scandinavian
    For more of this concrete in power !!!


    Nevertheless, it would be better to concrete some comrades in power, including those who have recently come under amnesty.
  11. komrad.klim
    +1
    15 May 2014 09: 17
    re post
    http://topwar.ru/47072-revansh-pyatoy-kolonny-vozvraschenie-liberalov-grozit-ros
    sii-unichtozheniem.html # comment-id-2534168

    Putin is without a doubt a decent man. But there is a main trouble! Putin is part of a vicious system with a degenerated consciousness of not only the elite, but also ordinary members of society, a society with a lack of a positive ideology. Societies with a complex mechanism of functioning of a huge power. A mechanism that does not optimally use resources, both human and natural, at all levels of life.
    remark - if everything were all right in Russia, or at least a concrete light was seen in the tunnel of future events, then Ukraine (practically all of the people of Ukraine) has long since "surrendered" to Russia.
    What to do?
    It is urgent for Putin to assemble a monolithic real team of like-minded people. Under this command, develop a strategic line for concrete creation for the benefit of the whole society, and not for the elite. It is natural to build a positive ideology under this constructive line.
    Only in this way will Russia have a great future.
    Otherwise, Russia, as a mono-power, will not be able to compete with other positive systems that exist or are being formed. (with)
  12. 0
    15 May 2014 09: 30
    Quote: teron
    Or the 17th?

    Alas, this is impossible, there are no such people - carriers of ideas :-)
  13. +3
    15 May 2014 09: 52
    2014-2016 Teft ambassador to Russia, since 2016, dismissed as not meeting the expectations of the US Secretary of State and President!
  14. +2
    15 May 2014 09: 55
    and held the post of first deputy commander of the regional command of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation on the territory of the North Caucasian Military District.
    A bit not exactly - not on the "territory of the North Caucasus Military District," but it would be correct to call it the North Caucasus Regional Command of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Geographically, it coincides, or rather coincided with the North Caucasus Military District, but the North Caucasus Military District has long been gone - but there is the Southern Military District. And this is more than just the North Caucasus. SK RK VV MVD RF - is the most numerous in the internal troops and at the same time belligerent. Of course, the experience that General Melikov gained in this region, as well as his personal knowledge of the situation, will be a good help for him to work in his new position. For comparison, his predecessor, "Varangian" Khloponin, arrived in the Caucasus from Krasnoyarsk (although, in fact, from Moscow). And Melikov - consider the local. So, is there a difference? When Khloponin was appointed here, the stake was made on the fact that he was, they say, "an experienced business executive." He was known for successfully solving the economic problems of the Krasnoyarsk Territory during his governorship there. But now, four years have passed and now the economic experiment to transform the Caucasus can be considered complete. The Caucasus, as it was before Khloponin, was one continuous problem, so it remains.
    All the rare economic and economic achievements in the Caucasus, such as the construction of greenhouse complexes in the CBD or the assembly of Chinese cars in the KCR, were not directly related to Khloponin's activities. Khloponinsky period was remembered by tourist projects about the desire to build ski resorts in Chechnya and Dagestan. (?!) However, from the very beginning it was not clear who could seriously believe in the prospects of tourism in the region where the war has been going on for more than two decades. But it was absolutely clear that the creation of a tourism cluster in the Caucasus is not much different from the prospects of creating a similar cluster in Somalia or Afghanistan.
    Now, the circle of ideas on what to do with the Caucasus is closed. The economist and business executive was again replaced by a security official. Does this mean that the idea of ​​normalizing the situation in the region through the economy turned out to be wrong? And why each time the chosen scheme led to the theft of investments?
    Most likely, the Caucasus will have to go through another round repeating the previous one: military-politicians-law enforcement-economies
    1. dmb
      +4
      15 May 2014 10: 43
      Do you mean to say that under Kazantsev, the economy of the Caucasus took off? The Kazantsev family and his entourage - certainly yes. It’s like Krylov’s: "And you friends, how do not sit down ..." It is not necessary to change the scheme, but the system, but Putin is not going to do this. He is himself in the system. As for the substitutions, I will allow myself a seditious thought for hurray-patriots. The internal troops were created by Yeltsin to counterbalance the army, because he was not sure of the latter. The appointments indicate that Vova is afraid. And of course not Navalny and Makarevich or Novodvorskaya and Sobchak. In order to raise the economy in the sense of which the authorities are guided, money is needed. They will have to be collected. Weaning options are not rich: large owners (Ozero cooperative, etc.) and the bulk of the population. Of course, option two will be chosen, which the people may get tired of. This is where the BB appointees are needed.
      1. 0
        15 May 2014 15: 03
        Quote: dmb
        "And you friends, how do you not sit down ..." It is not necessary to change the scheme, but the system, but it is not Putin who will deal with this. He is himself in the system. As for the substitutions, I will allow myself a seditious thought for hurray-patriots. The internal troops were created by Yeltsin to counterbalance the army, because he was not sure of the latter. The appointments indicate that Vova is afraid. And of course not Navalny and Makarevich or Novodvorskaya and Sobchak. In order to raise the economy in the sense of which the authorities are guided, money is needed. They will have to be collected. Weaning options are not rich: large owners (Ozero cooperative, etc.) and the bulk of the population. Of course, option two will be chosen, which the people may get tired of. This is where the BB appointees are needed.


        Greetings, Dmitry.
        I join your opinion.
        1. 0
          16 May 2014 01: 01
          Quote: Normal
          I join your opinion

          Absolutely correctly noticed! And most importantly, they dig their own grave. The situation in Russia is similar to the situation in Ukraine.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. -1
      15 May 2014 14: 57
      Quote: demotivator
      Now, the circle of ideas on what to do with the Caucasus is closed. The economist and business executive was again replaced by a security official. Does this mean that the idea of ​​normalizing the situation in the region through the economy turned out to be wrong? And why each time the chosen scheme led to the theft of investments?


      Because "If a bird walks like a duck, dives like a duck and quacks like a duck, then most likely THIS IS A DUCK."
      The Petersburg people came to power under the slogan "Don't tell us anything, we know everything better than anyone else!"
      If successive actions (despite criticism and the suggestion of other options) for a long time lead to a certain result, then this result was the purpose of these actions even if the goals were declared completely opposite.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  15. 3vs
    +1
    15 May 2014 11: 46
    Well, ours to the new American ambassador can say - "yes you are the ambassador, you are not on our black lists of entry."
    laughing
    GDP seems to have come to such conclusions that in tsarist Russia it was not without purpose
    governors general.
    1. 0
      15 May 2014 16: 15
      Quote: 3vs
      that in tsarist Russia they appointed
      governors general.

      In tsarist Russia, not all provinces were part of the governor general. And not even half of the provinces.
  16. +1
    15 May 2014 12: 47
    Since the beginning of this week, Sergey Melikov has been representing the president in the North Caucasus Federal District. The envoy in the Siberian Federal District was Nikolai Rogozhkin.


    Logical steps. The North Caucasus, with its tension, was led by a man in uniform, well known to the local elites. Siberia is the forge of the defense power of our country.
  17. +4
    15 May 2014 14: 13
    For a long time there have been rumors in the power structures that the explosives will be withdrawn from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and on their basis something like the presidential guard will be created, which will report directly to the President of the Russian Federation. Apparently the time has come and a better candidate than General Zotov is not personally known , personally betrayed, etc. If so, why such a power structure, and even such a powerful one, the MVD of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is not small. Mr. President is not sure of anything or someone? I’m completely skeptical when the military and other security officials are being promoted to civil-administrative posts, as a rule it doesn’t lead to anything good, there are plenty of examples! What can the generals of the military understand in the financial system or industrial development? Why not! Next, the Ministry for the Development of the North Caucasus, and what does In this case, the administration of the North-Caucasian Federal District, and even Khloponin, Deputy Prime Minister, who oversees all this? Another cohort of officials who will cut and divide, and who also need to be fed from the budget. It seems to me that the point is not maintaining order and discipline on the ground, and not in the confidence of the authorities in their future. An example of Ukraine is clear. We have the same thing, corruption among officials of all levels and of all kinds goes through the roof, prices for everything climb up, etc. The discontent of the masses is growing. In general, the soil for the work of the external and internal enemy is very favorable. From here all these appointments and movements, it seems to me. Only these movements will not give a positive effect, the power is too agile and narrow-minded. It would be better to engage in struggle corruption and officials need to be reduced clearly not by 10%, but much more.
    1. +1
      15 May 2014 14: 45
      Quote: Kilo-11
      Another cohort of officials who will cut and divide, and who also need to be fed at the expense of the budget. It seems to me that the point is not in restoring order and discipline on the ground, but in not confidence in the authorities in their future. An example of Ukraine is clear. it’s the same thing, corruption among officials of all levels and of all kinds goes through the roof, prices for everything climb up, etc. The discontent of the masses is growing. In general, the soil for the work of the external and internal enemy is very favorable. From here all these appointments and movements, as it seems to me. Only these movements will not give a positive effect, it’s not too agile and narrow-minded people have power. It would be better to take up the fight against corruption


      Plusgood
    2. -1
      16 May 2014 01: 06
      Quote: Kilo-11
      It would be better to fight corruption

      How will corruption fight corruption? belay It's impossible! Systemic crisis. Their goal of management is to plunder the country! And the true goal is the reproduction of the population, i.e. when mortality = fertility. And for this it is necessary that there is no corruption. Vicious circle.
  18. +4
    15 May 2014 14: 35
    In our country, even the most progressive leaders throughout history carry out reforms "for the people, but without the people."
  19. +1
    15 May 2014 14: 41
    I do not agree with the position of the Author in this article. My minus.
  20. +1
    15 May 2014 17: 48
    Quote: nycsson
    Quote: ZU-23
    This is Putin so playing chess with the Americans

    Rather, with us .....


    It seems to me that you are not quite right.
  21. padonok.71
    0
    15 May 2014 19: 04
    To appoint Yermolov to the Caucasus! And peace of 150 years is ensured, they will be afraid to fart.
  22. raf
    0
    15 May 2014 19: 20
    In vain this scum, Taffta, accredited! It will stink the bastard !!!
  23. Crang
    +1
    15 May 2014 19: 33
    Everybody advertises the "great" Vladimir Vladimirovich .... The "great" Vladimir Vladimirovich has solved many questions. Yes, he beats Europe. Yes, he beats the United States. It seems that he owns the whole world BUT. But with all this, he is afraid ... of the Chechens. The Caucasus is afraid. These idiots, bandits and militants. He is not afraid of the most powerful superpower in the world, the United States, and he is afraid of some kind of Caucasus ... Which means that all his achievements are nothing and we still feel humiliated.
  24. SLX
    SLX
    0
    15 May 2014 22: 37
    Quote: Volodin Alexey
    All these appointments are by no means the usual coincidence.


    By coincidence, no one is appointed to subordinate positions. And behind each such appointment there are always complex hardware games of various teams that have significantly different interests and actively defend them in the undercover fight.


    The president places people in very significant posts whose working principles are well known to him.


    Probably, we should still be talking about the President’s knowledge (it is capitalized according to the rules of the Russian language and office work) of their business and moral qualities, as well as knowledge of their personal interests, without which knowledge of business and moral qualities burdens as unnecessary.

    An important aspect here is that it was precisely the people in uniform who took over the presidential representatives — moreover, those who perfectly understand the responsibility imposed on them.


    It is not worth building illusions - shoulder straps on our shoulders have not been talking about anything for a long time.

    Obviously, such a move is aimed at strengthening the vertical of power - although this term gives in cliches, but this does not reduce the role of the vertical itself.


    Obviously? But it is very controversial. Rather, these appointments speak of the very short length of the bench on which people sit, personally loyal to Putin and having their own interests that do not interfere with his plans. And about the change of some priorities in domestic politics.

    Quote: Volodin Alexey
    Why is the strengthening (reformatting) of the imperious “structure” happening right now, and why did it need to “drive” new “piles” into the foundation? One of the reasons is the situation that is developing today around Russia, around the spectrum of state interests. The authorities are forced to respond to the pressure that the foreign “partners” are already exerting, and which they are just preparing to exert


    Foreign policy, of course, affects these appointments, but its importance in this matter is too exaggerated. The main reason is that there is still a complicated sweep of the bureaucratic apparatus and, most likely, preparations for a decisive sweep of Medvedev’s people in front of NG.

    But there is simply no one to put in their place - all those who have already grown to such heights are long and fairly smeared, and the level of their professionalism, for the most part, is at least sufficient for covert games in the interests of their teams and in their own interests, but not for management by the state, and even in the long run.
  25. 0
    15 May 2014 23: 17
    Strengthening power structures with their personnel is the right step of the president.
  26. +1
    16 May 2014 06: 31
    I'm not strong in politics. Tell me, can we not completely abandon the US ambassadors in our country?
    1. 0
      16 May 2014 07: 08
      Quote: mariya
      Tell me, can we not completely abandon the US ambassadors in our country?

      And for what? The system of international relations between states has been built for centuries, and the institution of envoys (ambassadors, attachés, etc.) is an irreplaceable tool for resolving various emerging issues or frictions between states.
      Refusal to communicate through embassies means a break in relations and cannot lead to anything good ...