Military Review

The position of the BTK Group regarding publication in the Izvestia newspaper. False information must be refuted

27
The position of the BTK Group regarding publication in the Izvestia newspaper. False information must be refuted



In the newspaper "Izvestia" from 13 in May 2014, an article was published "The Ministry of Defense requires the supplier of the form 3,4 billion rubles." It argues that in the 2 year of cooperation with the sole supplier of clothing and equipment for the army, the Ministry of Defense filed 15 lawsuits in the amount of 3,4 billion rubles. This information is untrue, and the title misleads the readers of the article.

"BTK Group" performs the function of the sole supplier of clothing property of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on the basis of the current government order from 05.09.12 No. 1612-p, that is, starting in September 2012. Without exception, all the claims of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation relate to government contracts concluded between the department and the BTK Group in 2010, 2011 and the first half of 2012, when the company participated in open auctions on a general basis, prior to its appointment as the sole supplier.

The total amount of claims amounted to 3,127 billion rubles. However, the court found most of the claims unreasonable. Thus, the cumulative sum of payments by BTK Group amounted to 151 million rubles.

In addition, we consider it necessary to comment on the quotation by the President of the Russian Union of Entrepreneurs of Textile and Light Industry, Andrei Razbrodin, cited in the article "Izvestia". In fact, no company can operate on state order at its own discretion, since current legislation (previously - FZ-94, now - FZ-44, as well as the Federal Law on the defense order and the by-laws adopted for their development) and government contracts establish a strict framework of work of the state contractor, including the sole supplier. Thus, the terms of contracts with suppliers and contractors attracted by the "BTK Group" for the execution of the state order must duplicate the conditions of the state contract, in addition, the rules on profit margins apply when determining the price of the state contract. The only supplier produces finished products, and also buys raw materials and materials for their release in strict accordance with the technical conditions of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. The state customer, for its part, carries out quality control of the supplied products, the samples and standards of which the company and the state customer agree upon after signing the state contract. In addition, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has information about all the contractors of the BTK Group, attracted by the company to the execution of the state order. Thus, the company attracted 2013 Russian manufacturers of ready-made clothes, footwear, accessories, raw materials and materials for the execution of the 178 state defense order.

Thus, the existing relations between the state customer and the sole supplier are strictly regulated, the rules oblige the parties cooperating under the state order to resolve disputed issues in a dialogue mode, including through judicial instances.

This practice is generally accepted and allows civilized way to resolve the disputes of two economic entities.

The publication in the Izvestia newspaper is an attempt to influence public opinion and convince the audience that BTK Group fulfills its obligations to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation as the sole supplier of clothing property with violations.

The company is outraged by the fact that the newspaper Izvestiya is disseminating information that is defamatory to BTK groups and does not correspond to reality and, without verifying the accuracy of the data, which the media law requires from the newspaper, publishes them.

In this regard, BTK Group demanded a refutation of false information on the pages of the Izvestia newspaper, on the official website of the Izvestia newspaper, as well as on the information resources of the News Media-Rus holding, which actively replicated the article, namely, lifenews.ru . The company earnestly requests publications that have reprinted news "Izvestia" about the "BTK Group", also correct the message.

The company is ready to defend its reputation in court. The purpose of this trial should be to establish the responsibility of the publication, which published inaccurate information, as well as those who contributed to their wide dissemination.

***

Background information on the work of "BTK Group" in the status of the sole supplier of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:

BTK Group performs the function of the sole supplier of clothing property of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on the basis of the current order of the Russian government from 05.09.2012, No. 1612-p, that is, starting in September of 2012.

The practice of working with the sole suppliers of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation was applied even before the appointment of the BTK Group as the sole supplier of property for the needs of the department.

The analysis of the auctions held by the department showed that they often involve legal entities with an unstable financial situation, who do not have the production facilities and human resources necessary to fulfill the contract. Such participants could win in the competitions of the department by dumping. It was also found that the smaller the amount of lots, the greater the number of participants involved in the purchase, which increased the likelihood of failure to place an order due to the possible filing of a large number of complaints and, as a result, delaying the auction. For example, only at the beginning of 2012, the term for placing orders for the supply of clothing and equipment was 4-9 months. This state of affairs led to the threat of disrupting the provision of clothing and equipment to military personnel of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

In this regard, the Government of the Russian Federation issued an order from 5 of September 2012, No. 16-12-r, on the definition of JSC BTK Groups as the sole supplier of property for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

At the same time, the order of the government of the Russian Federation on the definition of any enterprise as the sole supplier does not limit the customer in placing an order by other means provided for by the legislation, including through open auctions.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. siberko
    siberko 14 May 2014 12: 44
    +1
    I thought Yudashkin was involved here ....
    1. maks-101
      maks-101 14 May 2014 14: 04
      +2
      Yudashkin, I said nothing to do with it, but by and large, at the moment the Moscow Region and the soldiers are happy with the uniforms, for example, we went to P / Sha in the winter in the winter and nothing to eat normally and ate porridge with a wrestling, and now they are choosing a few dishes.
    2. mad
      mad 14 May 2014 14: 14
      0
      and even a dozen pid ... obviously did not do without a stool ... owls (not in orientation, but in spirit) sucked to the arteries feeding our Army and Navy.
  2. Roman1970
    Roman1970 14 May 2014 12: 45
    +5
    The company is outraged by the fact that the newspaper Izvestiya is disseminating information that is defamatory to BTK groups and does not correspond to reality and, without verifying the accuracy of the data, which the media law requires from the newspaper, publishes them.

    What is there to discuss at all? The usual dispute between business entities ... As if there are no other problems in the world ...
    1. strannik595
      strannik595 14 May 2014 12: 53
      +6
      VO site now and arbitration court, meet
      non-governmental judicial authority that resolves disputes under economic (economic) agreements between legal entities, legal entities and citizens, citizens among themselves.
      ......... cheers, comrades! soon there will be news how the wife of one major slandered the wife of another, the injured party demands compensation laughing
  3. lelikas
    lelikas 14 May 2014 12: 46
    +4
    Let me guess - We used to be, from 10 to 12 years were bad, now the only and good!
    1. jjj
      jjj 14 May 2014 13: 01
      +2
      If we talk about the form, then in those years the so-called "from Yudashkin" did not stand up to any criticism. They said that in order to reduce the cost, materials were replaced. And now the so-called form "from Shoigu" has become much better. True, her kit costs 50 thousand rubles
      1. xenod55
        xenod55 14 May 2014 13: 25
        +3
        It is checked on itself. The winter kit from Shoigu is much better than Yudashkinsky, but even here there are certain shortcomings. But all the same, this is no longer a step forward from cotton stuffing, but a whole kilometer. We must continue to work.
        1. Altona
          Altona 14 May 2014 13: 33
          +2
          Quote: xenod55
          It is checked on itself. The winter kit from Shoigu is much better than Yudashkinsky, but even here there are certain shortcomings. But all the same, this is no longer a step forward from cotton stuffing, but a whole kilometer. We must continue to work.

          -------------------------
          Americans, by the way, are constantly working to improve their fit, color, fabric composition, ease of use. All comments are carefully taken into account, including complaints against suppliers regarding the quality of materials and the finished form. In this regard, it seems to me that the amers have a good deal, the rear services are working. soldier
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Orc-xnumx
          Orc-xnumx 14 May 2014 13: 59
          0
          What does Yudashkin7 have to do with a form from Serdyukov!
  4. siberko
    siberko 14 May 2014 12: 47
    +6
    Anyway, 94-FZ and now 44-FZ is the most corrupt law in the world .... believe me as a financier ....
    1. siberko
      siberko 14 May 2014 12: 56
      +1
      and if a monopolist, then this is absolutely a "gold mine"
    2. Mareman Vasilich
      Mareman Vasilich 14 May 2014 13: 15
      0
      What's the catch? Seriously, without sarcasm.
      1. siberko
        siberko 14 May 2014 13: 41
        0
        what’s the matter ... one of the parties to the contract threw the other ... probably with the size of the rollback .... so they started digging into commas .... or the official changed .... it's like popping jambs of a 100-year-old statute of limitations when changing an official when a post is being received))))
      2. siberko
        siberko 14 May 2014 13: 43
        0
        and if you asked about 44-fz and 94-fz .... then the bidding is always won by the one "who is needed" wink
  5. mig31
    mig31 14 May 2014 12: 53
    +3
    Such a feeding trough cannot have everything smoothly, so they argue ...
  6. Wels75
    Wels75 14 May 2014 12: 54
    +5
    The article is not about anything. it feels like BTK have promoted themselves. that's all. article ftopku.
  7. Rohon
    Rohon 14 May 2014 13: 04
    +2
    Flog all. One hundred lashes, and both. am
  8. Sterlya
    Sterlya 14 May 2014 13: 05
    +2
    Serdyukov did not light up there? wassat
  9. rasputin17
    rasputin17 14 May 2014 13: 08
    0
    The question arises one: - And why the state itself will not create a single enterprise under the state authority and all the consequences? After all, these are new jobs and income to the treasury!
    We do not know now who or whose interests are behind this company!
    1. Roshchin
      Roshchin 14 May 2014 13: 26
      0
      Directly touches when you read that it is not state. the company became the sole supplier of clothing for the Moscow Region. Looks like the appropriate officials in the Russian government appointed her the only one for great successes in military and political training and do not think anything bad.
      1. evil hamster
        evil hamster 14 May 2014 14: 16
        0
        You won't believe it, but there can be an unlimited number of "only suppliers" of anything. This is a kind of crutch, so that in conditions of a curve of 93fz, at least somehow work.
  10. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 14 May 2014 13: 13
    +8
    Somehow like this...
  11. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 14 May 2014 13: 22
    +1
    Oh, damn it, to return this responsibility. http://pyhalov.livejournal.com/308085.html
  12. andj61
    andj61 14 May 2014 13: 46
    +1
    Some crap. It is clear that if there is a single supplier, violations are all the more possible. It is clear that this is in any way someone's feeding trough. But why is this article on VO? They would mention that there is such a dispute between business entities - that’s all!
  13. Giant thought
    Giant thought 14 May 2014 14: 00
    +3
    I also am of the opinion that the article was posted on the wrong site. It is best to post such articles on the website of the Investigative Committee.
  14. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 14 May 2014 14: 02
    +4
    It is necessary to work better, to steal less then there will be no ships, no, under the Union all the same they stole less.
  15. evil hamster
    evil hamster 14 May 2014 14: 20
    +1
    And finally, they gave Izvestia a muzzle, otherwise they got used to the fact that no one reacts to their attacks towards the Moscow region, but here you go, the private trader was hurt and urine ran through the pipes :)
  16. inkass_98
    inkass_98 14 May 2014 14: 25
    +3
    Inspired by ...
    According to the box yesterday showed: Ukropitek troops received the German (!) Form, apparently - according to tradition. It is either easier to fight against civilians and partisans, or it is easier to flee from them.
    http://takie.org/news/tradicii_fashizma/2014-05-13-10412
    1. SHOCK.
      SHOCK. 14 May 2014 15: 32
      0
      Quote: inkass_98
      Inspired by ...
      According to the box yesterday showed: Ukropitek troops received the German (!) Form, apparently - according to tradition. It is either easier to fight against civilians and partisans, or it is easier to flee from them.
      http://takie.org/news/tradicii_fashizma/2014-05-13-10412

      And as for the form, it is not clear to whom and for what gratitude?
      In addition, the fighters of special units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs expressed their gratitude for the support to the residents of the Kharkiv region, as well as to the entrepreneurs of the Izyumsky region of the region, who provide comprehensive assistance to the Armed Forces and the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
  17. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 14 May 2014 16: 46
    0
    Serdyukovskaya wife steers?
  18. siberalt
    siberalt 14 May 2014 16: 48
    0
    "BTK group" is this translated from what? That's the same. What is the bazaar about? laughing