4.76 billion dollars to upgrade armored vehicles

24
4.76 billion dollars to upgrade armored vehiclesAccording to the army-guide.com, with reference to ASDReports, this year the cost of upgrading and upgrading military armored vehicles in the world will peak at 4.76 billion dollars. The results of the study are published in the report “Modernization of armored vehicles and 2014-2024 market growth forecast: opportunities for leading companies”, which analyzes in detail the state of the global market and possible areas for expansion.

According to analysts, governments of different countries are constantly under pressure from defense budgets, in connection with which modernization and updating of armored vehicles are a good alternative to new purchases.

It is also noted that in 2014, the armed forces headed by the United States will leave the territory of Afghanistan, which can “shift the focus” towards military air and naval assets in other areas of the planet. Thus, the acquisition of new ground-based systems will become less of a priority, and the demand for upgrading and upgrading will increase.

The report says that at the moment the level of demand is quite stable. In some categories, growth prospects are observed. According to experts, they studied the 20 leading national markets.
  • http://www.army-guide.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    13 May 2014 10: 58
    I remember someone was trying to argue that the tanks are yesterday, that they have already outlived their own as a class and will die out like dinosaurs ...
    4,76 billion forever green - this is the real argument for the fact that armored vehicles remain and will for a long time be the main striking force of the ground forces.
    Give Armata to the stream !!!! wink
    1. +3
      13 May 2014 11: 00
      On strategic expanses, the tank will be in demand for a long time, I think!
      1. jjj
        +3
        13 May 2014 11: 03
        And, as it turns out, in the near future, against the backdrop of aluminum high-standing cars, even fifty-heel will be a very formidable force
        1. +3
          13 May 2014 11: 12
          This is where the Omsk Tank ...
          And let UVZ go about its business. He’s not turning them right now. hi
          1. +1
            13 May 2014 12: 47
            Here is that and I wrote a couple of posts earlier. I agree drinks
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          13 May 2014 12: 46
          The old people still show that old age is not non-existence)) Dry powder them)
    2. +2
      13 May 2014 11: 10
      Quote: Hammer
      4,76 billion forever green - that’s the real argument

      when you consider that Soviet and Russian tanks are the most massive, from those exported to
      other countries, a good increase to the budget of the Russian Federation.
      1. +1
        13 May 2014 11: 36
        upgrades and upgrades will increase.

        new tracked armored vehicles in the United States and NATO countries (Turkey exception))), do not produce !!!!
        released only in China, South Korea, Japan and Southeast Asia ....

        In the USA and NATO, modernization is underway:
        1. Upgrade, wired from RPG, ATGM ...
        2.Mine mine protection ...
        3. installation of complexes of "situational awareness" ..
        4.new SLAs, thermal imagers, etc ...
    3. +3
      13 May 2014 11: 30
      Quote: Hammer
      I remember someone was trying to argue that the tanks are yesterday, that they have already outlived their own as a class and will die out like dinosaurs ...

      Those who bury them will die out like dinosaurs ... due to an inborn shortage of gray matter and an inability to adapt to changing geopolitical climate laughing
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +1
      13 May 2014 12: 44
      I do not share your optimism, Komrad! What is 5 watermelon in the aggregate MIC market in the world ??? I assure you a little ... But what can not but rejoice, is that since such a trend has been outlined, then if you take into account the number of Russian armored vehicles from the Allied and former Allied countries, this makes you smile))) modernization of the park is not pass by our military-industrial complex both inside and outside the country! The news is unambiguous PLUS !!
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. Hon
      +1
      13 May 2014 12: 56
      Quote: Hammer
      4,76 billion forever green - this is the real argument for the fact that armored vehicles remain and will for a long time be the main striking force of the ground forces.

      their military budget exceeds half a trillion, more than all military budgets, the rest of the countries combined.
  2. +4
    13 May 2014 11: 01
    It is also noted that in 2014, the armed forces headed by the United States will leave the territory of Afghanistan, which can “shift the focus” towards military air and naval assets in other areas of the planet. Thus, the acquisition of new ground-based systems will become less of a priority, and the demand for upgrading and upgrading will increase.

    That's interesting, but how will they leave, in the light of the upcoming sanctions and our relations with the Americans?
    By air through the Russian Federation-will not work.
    Will they go through Pakistan? lol
    Then it is certain that "the demand for modernization and renewal will increase."
    1. +3
      13 May 2014 11: 05
      Quote: podpolkovnik



      Will they go through Pakistan? lol
      .

      Yeah. With fights.
      1. 0
        13 May 2014 12: 50
        they will offer counter sanctions against their sanctions))))))
    2. +1
      13 May 2014 12: 49
      shh ... this joker is still up the sleeve)))) bully
  3. +3
    13 May 2014 11: 03
    Modernization is, of course, wonderful, but it does not solve all the problems of the tank. In fact, the tank fleets of the world are vehicles of the late 80s - early 90s of the last century, just with a new filling. But how long can this situation last? A fundamentally new tank is necessary in any case. The only positive side of modernization is that it reduces the cost of new weapons. But it is somehow doubtful, this positive side.
    1. 0
      13 May 2014 12: 53
      as long as there is a resource, it is necessary to work it out, and the new is only a breakthrough something needs to be done, and so the next compilation of the old school will come out, as one comrade wrote above, with welded reinforced stiffeners. UVZ seems to be preparing an armadillo - and there we will see how it is done in a new way))
  4. +1
    13 May 2014 11: 07
    The main striking force of the ground forces are our tanks. Faster would be a series of new tanks and new armored vehicles based on them. good drinks
  5. 0
    13 May 2014 11: 36
    Modernization is cheaper, and therefore modernize. With a fairly modest investment, you can get a very acceptable result.
  6. +2
    13 May 2014 11: 38
    If all Russian tanks are converted to gas, the creaking of teeth from Europe will be heard in Japan. :)
    1. 0
      13 May 2014 12: 55
      HBO tank? HONOR)))) but if you want to listen to what sounds the crumbling teeth of the Europeans make))) then tada yes approving .... by the way, the grit of teeth is nasty by ear weigh .... IMHO
  7. Arh
    0
    13 May 2014 11: 44
    And I like Russians !!!)))
  8. 0
    13 May 2014 11: 45
    Good news for our factories ... There are a lot of our technicians in the World ... The volume of modernization is large
  9. Gagarin
    0
    13 May 2014 12: 05
    I think if you make her a modern electronic upgrade then very, very much!
    Quote: jjj
    And, as it turns out, in the near future, against the backdrop of aluminum high-standing cars, even fifty-heel will be a very formidable force
  10. +2
    13 May 2014 12: 06
    Well, we will upgrade. And then, after all, it’s inconvenient somehow to travel to Europe for junk ...
    1. 0
      13 May 2014 12: 56
      This is not junk !!!! This is a classic !!! soldier
  11. 0
    13 May 2014 12: 06
    ... but you don’t need to forget about the Navy, there is enough work for everyone soldier , and who will be on combat duty in the strait between Canada and Mexico laughing
  12. 0
    13 May 2014 12: 10
    Quote: cosmos111
    upgrades and upgrades will increase.

    new tracked armored vehicles in the United States and NATO countries (Turkey exception))), do not produce !!!!
    released only in China, South Korea, Japan and Southeast Asia ....

    In the USA and NATO, modernization is underway:
    1. Upgrade, wired from RPG, ATGM ...
    2.Mine mine protection ...
    3. installation of complexes of "situational awareness" ..
    4.new SLAs, thermal imagers, etc ...

    In light of the confrontation with Russian tanks, the mass and speed of foreign models already look superheavy and slow
  13. 0
    13 May 2014 20: 35
    Today, modernization of Soviet (Russian) equipment is offered not only by Russians, but also by Ukraine, Poland, Israel, the Czech Republic, China and India. So the competition for potential customers will be powerful ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"