Military Review

Russia is entering the final stage of the destruction of chemical weapons

23
Valery Kapashin, Head of the Federal Directorate for the Safe Storage and Destruction of Chemical Weapons, in an interview Interfax reported that Russia destroyed about 80% of its chemical weapons. Today, about 8 thousand tons of chemical weapons remain in stock.


Russia is entering the final stage of the destruction of chemical weapons


To date, chemical munitions of complex construction are not destroyed. Their main feature is that the development of such ammunition used the so-called anti-handling technology. For their disposal, an additional special line is required, which is planned to be put into operation within the framework of the chemical disarmament program. The lines that are already actively used for the disposal of chemical weapons, created exclusively by Russian technology.

Along with the destruction of chemical weapons located in Russian special warehouses, Russia takes an active part in the destruction of Syrian weapons of this type. To date, the Syrian media have reported the destruction of up to 92% of chemical weapons, including with the help of Russian specialists.

According to Pentagon spokesman John Kirby, the remaining 8% of Syrian chemical weapons have not yet been removed from the country due to the tense situation around the facilities in which it is located.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 12 May 2014 20: 17
    +8
    ?????? And how is the United States resolved on this issue? Maybe we should not hurry now?
    1. mamont5
      mamont5 12 May 2014 20: 27
      +3
      Quote: svp67
      ?????? And how is the United States resolved on this issue? Maybe we should not hurry now?


      Here I am about the same. No need to rush. Or cushion the remainder.
      According to the plan, the United States was to destroy its chemical weapons by April 2012. Russia - until December 2015 of the year.
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%EE%ED%E2%E5%ED%F6%E8%FF_%EE_%E7%E0%EF%F0%E5%F9%
      E5%ED%E8%E8_%F5%E8%EC%E8%F7%E5%F1%EA%EE%E3%EE_%EE%F0%F3%E6%E8%FF
      1. nika407
        nika407 12 May 2014 20: 34
        +4
        That is exactly what we disagree with the States. Our destruction is perceived as recycling. And the Americans simply transport and stack somewhere, this is their destruction. So with EBN it was. It was, however, about nuclear weapons.
        1. clidon
          clidon 13 May 2014 05: 41
          0
          XO is exactly what is being destroyed. And about some kind of warehousing more legend than reality. It was about the media that the Americans were taking apart "for storage." We did the same, but some of the missiles were actually detonated.
    2. atarix
      atarix 12 May 2014 20: 54
      +2
      I think you should not worry.
      chemical weapons alone are quite simple, and given the significant progress in reducing the minimum doses
      5% of the then amount of arsenals is enough for the eyes of the whole world.
      and there are viruses
  2. Roman1970
    Roman1970 12 May 2014 20: 19
    +3
    I also care about the States! Are they destroying something?
  3. TEODOR
    TEODOR 12 May 2014 20: 20
    +5
    PEOPLE URGENTLY MAXIMUM REPOST !!!! UN Security Council: Recognize "Right Sector" as a terrorist organization like Al Qaeda. COLLECTING SIGNATURES !!!!
    https://secure.avaaz.org/ru/petition/Sovet_Bezopasnosti_OON_Ostanovit_fashizm_na
    _Ukraine /
    It is urgent to stop the spread of fascism around the world! They threaten death to all, each of us!
  4. Vladimir 23rus
    Vladimir 23rus 12 May 2014 20: 21
    +1
    Hurry in vain agree. And why all the time in the usa? How about the rest ??? angry
  5. Samaritan
    Samaritan 12 May 2014 20: 23
    +2
    And here is the article on VO in response: http://topwar.ru/32742-kak-i-kogda-ssha-primenyali-himicheskoe-oruzhie.html
  6. gandalf
    gandalf 12 May 2014 20: 24
    +3
    How I want to leave a couple of charges for the Bandera jackals, but ... no way.
    We'll have to do the soap again with a rope.
    1. Orc-xnumx
      Orc-xnumx 12 May 2014 21: 20
      0
      You can also use the American "Vanish"!
      1. seregatara1969
        seregatara1969 13 May 2014 00: 06
        0
        WITH SMALTS WILL GO
  7. Delink
    Delink 12 May 2014 20: 30
    +2
    Why not cover the disarmament of chemical weapons in SyShyA?
    You can no longer comply with the contract due to sanctions.
    Quit START-3
    1. rozowik
      rozowik 12 May 2014 22: 36
      +1
      But it’s not necessary, by the way, it’s not far from me, and it’s a couple of tens of kilometers (and it’s a little over 30 to the plant), the largest chemical weapons warehouse in Russia, Pochep’s, is located, but you don’t know that something would happen there.
      Especially with the use of modern technology to mix this is not a problem.
  8. maksim
    maksim 12 May 2014 20: 31
    +2
    why are we in a hurry, if only long-term storage is dangerous then yes!
  9. Old Cynic
    Old Cynic 12 May 2014 20: 32
    +4
    Colleagues, it is just right to recall the anecdote about the lieutenant, who, during the disarmament, forgot the Topol division in the taiga ... Neither we nor the States will destroy the CW until the end ... this is an axiom! As long as there is the slightest likelihood of an armed conflict, neither side will fully disarm. Putin is not Marked, he will not move.
  10. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 12 May 2014 20: 33
    +3
    Sometimes you think about how many different rubbish they came up with to kill people, they tried to invent, whole industries, institutions worked, now we are trying to destroy what was done, how much effort, money, human knowledge was wasted, but what a disorderly creature a person is.
  11. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 12 May 2014 20: 37
    +3
    In general, any ammunition has a shelf life, the old in any case must be destroyed. I don’t know anything about the production of new ones, but the latest designs are so effective that the development of new ones hardly makes sense, and we know how to make them. In addition, many new weapons of wave and impulse action are being developed that can replace chemical weapons.
  12. Deniska999
    Deniska999 12 May 2014 20: 41
    0
    It is necessary to leave a little, you never know ...
  13. Ivan 63
    Ivan 63 12 May 2014 20: 44
    +1
    Leave the NZ until the complete destruction of the chemical weapons of the West and their proteges.
  14. Palladium900
    Palladium900 12 May 2014 20: 59
    +2
    In response to this kind gesture by the United States, it would be nice to curtail the activities of the Pentagon's bacteriological laboratory in Georgia and Odessa.
  15. Orc-xnumx
    Orc-xnumx 12 May 2014 21: 16
    0
    It is just necessary to send an inspection to 3.14ndostan! Something they calmed down. This is not good!
  16. miasoman
    miasoman 12 May 2014 21: 22
    +1
    Quote: Palladium900
    In response to this kind gesture by the United States, it would be nice to curtail the activities of the Pentagon's bacteriological laboratory in Georgia and Odessa.

    are those on which maidanuto viruses develop? laughing
  17. Zomanus
    Zomanus 13 May 2014 04: 01
    0
    Destroy this muck clearly. It’s one thing when conventional arsenals plow, there the infrastructure mostly suffers. And if at least a couple of products from the arsenal of chemical weapons smell, here we can talk about the destruction of the population, right up to the elimination of settlements. So nafig-nafig ... Chemical weapons degrade over time, changing their composition. let the Americans hide, they do not mind.