The key to geopolitical stability is a new economic system

60
The key to geopolitical stability is a new economic system


I have always had and always will have a special view on all the geopolitical problems of our time. Namely, I always proceed in my assessments a priori from the economy, and not from politics, the military component or any other factors. That is, the economy is primary, and everything else is secondary.

Historically, the whole world after the collapse of the USSR with its planned economy and independent monetary system lives in the captivity of the Jamaican monetary system, which came into being in 1976-1978 through the fundamental reorganization of the Bretton Woods agreements. After the fall of the USSR, this system actually subjugated the whole world together with its derivative in the form of the European Monetary System (a form of organization of currency relations between the member countries of the European Economic Community).

The fact that such a Jamaican monetary system, anyone can ask himself, it is not difficult. I will touch only its very essence. The Jamaican currency system is the key to the dominance of world currencies: the dollar and the euro. This currency system does not imply any provision of these currencies with gold or anything else. As a result, we got a completely virtual economy based on constantly changing cross-rates of currencies, which are manipulated by the world's largest banks.

And who is behind the dollar and the euro? Officially, the dollar is issued by the US Federal Reserve, and the euro is by the European Central Bank. Who actually belongs to the Fed has long been known. This is a private bank, directly controlled by the Rothschild barons, who, in fact, created it in 1913.

As for the European Central Bank, the situation there is a bit more interesting. The only shareholders of the European Central Bank are the central banks of the EU member states. They also form the authorized capital of the European Central Bank, which currently amounts to 5 billion euros. But at the same time, only the leadership and the European Parliament can influence the activities of the European Central Bank. From all other world and European state institutions, the European Central Bank is completely independent.

After such a small analysis of the situation, it becomes obvious to whom the Jamaican monetary system is beneficial. These are the Rothschild barons and the European bankers who de facto control the European Central Bank. By issuing "candy wrappers", this narrow group of individuals controls the entire global economy and has almost nothing and no limited income. And it is easy to guess that this group of people is completely satisfied with this state of affairs, and in no case do they want to lose their place under the sun.

I also want to highlight another issue that no one ever touches on openly. Are the European Central Bank and the euro competitors for the Fed and the dollar ?! Yes definitely are. And from the very appearance of the euro in January of 1999, between the currencies there has been a “hot” financial war.



The Jamaican currency system, created and maintained by international bankers, performs the tasks set by these same bankers. Accordingly, due in large part to this monetary system, the entire world economy was built on loan interest and developed only due to expansion into the Third World countries, which became raw materials appendages and a sales market for the “golden billion”. But, as you know, all good things end sooner or later. The same happened to the world economy: there was almost nowhere to expand, resources are running out, and competitors are becoming impudent.

Up to now, the outcome of the resolution of global world economic problems has always been war. The First and Second World Wars were caused precisely by economic factors, and then by geopolitical factors. Who and who “threw up” there is a conversation, of course, a special one. But the economy was at the forefront: sales markets, resources, etc., and then everything else. This is the first thing to understand. On this and it is worth learning to be able to prevent the recurrence of such disasters.

Now we are standing on the threshold of the Third World War, since economic problems of a global scale have become practically unsolvable. The civil war in Libya, the Syrian conflict, the situation around Iran and the current outrages in Ukraine is its prelude. There is an arrangement of pieces on the global chessboard and, in my opinion, only the blind can not see it. But again, the actions of Russia, which has twice become a victim of world conspiracies and paid for it the highest price of all the victims - belated, indecisive, and often limited to only half measures. Iran and China behave in a similar manner to Russia, and in the New Wonderful World of the gentlemen of Rothschild, as independent players, there is no place either.

Libya, Syria, Ukraine, sanctions, EUROPRO, etc. - The West strikes blow after blow in all directions. And there is practically no response to aggression. You can scream for a long time about the “Great Satan” or hold rallies with the burning of stuffed “Uncle Sam”. There is no sense from this, and there never will be. We need concrete measures and concrete actions, we need an understanding of the situation and the challenges of our time, and not shaking the air based on “hurray-patriotism”.

I would like to talk about specific countermeasures. First of all, Russia, China, Iran, the CIS countries and Latin America should abandon the Jamaican monetary system and switch to a new type of monetary system based on a single currency that has material support (even if it is not gold, but just an objective industrial index production). Accordingly, all transactions between these countries should be carried out in this currency with the total rejection of the dollar and the euro.

The second point is also economic: it is necessary to abandon as much as possible the import of goods and services from Western countries (developing economic cooperation primarily with each other), and also to completely restrict the activities of Western financial institutions. At the same time for the export of raw materials to Western countries to enter the real price. Iran has long gone on this path. Now it's up to the rest.

The third point is the military-political one: it is necessary to create a buffer between the West and the East so as not to make the mistake of Joseph Stalin, which he made in 1939-1940, starting the accession of the Baltic States to the USSR and participating in the sections of Poland and Romania. Buffer states are needed and they are a guarantee of the stability of external borders. At the same time, these states should occupy a policy completely loyal to the metropolis. With the Baltics, this will not work out anymore, but with Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and a number of other countries everything is feasible. At the same time, the division of Ukraine into the West and the East is inevitable and the sooner it happens, the better it will be for everyone.



We are on the verge of global change and, possibly, global conflict. And in this situation it is necessary not even to simply respond to aggression (it is generally criminal to limit oneself to half measures), but also to attack oneself. The “Achilles heel” of the West is not an ideology, or even an army. This is the economy! Moreover, in the West they understand this and do everything to avoid a blow "in the stomach", while trying to deliver such a blow to a competitor.

But do they still understand all this in the proper amount in Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, Caracas and other capitals of countries at risk? I'm afraid not yet. And this for all of us can turn into a truly global catastrophe.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    5 May 2014 12: 02
    Let whoever considers it "offtopic", but each of you, understanding and caring people, who are also familiar with IT technologies, on the eve of the Great HOLIDAY, give a gift.

    Put a St. George ribbon on your avatars.
    I beg -

    http://gl9may.ru/avatar
    1. +4
      5 May 2014 12: 11
      Quote: Ptah
      Put a St. George ribbon on your avatars.

      Thanks for the share. hi
      1. +3
        5 May 2014 12: 48
        The author says that the economy controls everything else a second time, but in vain, the latest history has just shown that Satan controls the SS-20, which is just beginning to reform the world economy.
        1. +4
          5 May 2014 14: 03
          hi
          The current situation has clearly shown who is who for Russia.
          Russia, as the successor to the Russian Kingdom and Empires, with its current actions and intentions has restored its status quo to the other pole in the unipolar world, which arose largely due to the efforts of the overseas “partner” after the well-known sad events of the beginning of the 90's.
          Becoming, at the same time, we will not point a finger (!), For some - an ardent partner, for others, offended - a duty vest and hope for justice.
          Therefore, the jokes are over and the irony is not appropriate.
          And EVERYTHING that provides a confident and worthy state of Russia in its new geopolitical position is appropriate ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +10
        5 May 2014 13: 08
        I agree with the author in many ways. I do not agree that economics is primary, and the rest is kind of attached. Initially, there is an "idea" of what, how, and how you will fulfill your task or approach to life. If your worldview is dominated by the idea of ​​personal well-being carried out by a parasitic way of life, then you will build the economy accordingly. If the moral development of a person dictates to live in harmony with other people and nature, then he will carry out the economy in a different way than a parasite in human form.

        In the USSR of the Stalin era there were many enterprises that did not generate income, on the contrary, unprofitable, but needed by society. There is an exclusively ideological approach to the issue.

        So again, the approach to economics depends on the ideology (worldview) of a person. The parasite has one approach, the moral person has a completely different approach. In some ways they are similar, but in the main they diverge. What is necessary for one is not acceptable to the other.

        Quote: author
        But do they still understand all this in due volume in Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, Caracas and other capitals of countries from the “risk group” ?! I'm afraid not yet.


        Wai, wai, wai. As if in all these countries they don’t know what is going on. Some work. The fact that ours do not suit hysteria and do not surround military bases (which would only aggravate the situation, as under Khrushchev) of their enemy does not mean that they do nothing, and we have nothing in return. Our military in Crimea was blown away by the vaunted US and EU intelligence, and now they don’t know what to expect from Russia, and this is even worse than obvious actions.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      4. 0
        5 May 2014 13: 44
        Off topic.
        According to Vesti 24, the assault on Slavyansk began.
        In the suburbs there is a battle. There are losses.
    2. johnsnz
      +1
      5 May 2014 12: 50
      Thank you, dear! hi
    3. +1
      5 May 2014 13: 42
      Quote: Ptah
      I beg -

      Scha Vadim, great idea goodSet everything soldier
      1. +2
        5 May 2014 14: 20
        It’s a pity that this is not my idea ....
        I also thought about how the "smoker" would be combined with a ribbon.

        And then I reloaded the page and bam-ssss ...
        "Wild cat" ...
        1


        A year ago, there was a cat with a pirate bandage, then a "smoking buck" ...
        I thought that time is changing, we are not getting younger every year, I would like to offer you such a character, and here is kote .... For good reason !!!
        1. +1
          5 May 2014 14: 29
          Quote: Ptah
          we are not getting younger every year, I would like to offer you such a character,

          Not getting younger, yes, but not getting old, at that pace laughing In my heart, I’m 25 winked
          And he also put a tape to the smoker, but he didn’t roll it at all. And the people on the site would not understand.
          1. +1
            5 May 2014 14: 38
            We'll never be 75
            but only three times 25 ...

            All. I went on business .... hi
            You will fall asleep now. Then Pokedova. I’ll leave you this kid ...

            - Diman, come here. Go ahead and run. Sing here to the guys that he sang to me yesterday ... / pulls out from under the table a shaggy brow with a girlish face and hairstyle "a la CCCatch" (German Caroline Catharina Muller) / -
            1. 0
              5 May 2014 16: 00
              Quote: Ptah
              I’ll leave you this kid ...

              Malikov never listened. He does not insert me.
  2. +15
    5 May 2014 12: 04
    We are on the verge of global change and possibly global conflict. And in this situation, it is necessary to not only simply respond to aggression (it is generally criminal to limit oneself to half measures), but also to attack by oneself. The Achilles' Heel of the West is not an ideology or even an army. This is the economy! Moreover, in the West they understand this and are doing everything to avoid being hit "under the breath".
    The blow has to be applied not "under the gut", but to die. Enough polites. am
    1. 0
      5 May 2014 12: 36
      Are you for the third world war with the use of nuclear weapons or a war without the use of nuclear weapons?

      The author of the article would have to write that after the First World War the economic map of the world changed like that, and after the Second World War it did. And then say how, in his opinion, the world economy can change after the third world one way or another.
      1. +4
        5 May 2014 14: 08
        Quote: MainBeam
        Are you for the third world war with the use of nuclear weapons or a war without the use of nuclear weapons?

        - Well, somehow already tired of being afraid and afraid. As we start talking about retaliatory measures, especially in the part "Should we bring down the dollar?", They immediately start scaring us with a war. Yesterday GrBear frightened that it is easy to spit with the West, but it will be difficult to make peace with him later. Interestingly, when the west tilted Ukraine, like "either Russia or the west, choose!", He already spat on Russia with this demarche, only GrBear still does not know about it, he thinks that the rain has passed, because Russia is wet, but the fact that the west has lips were in seconds of "rain" a characteristic tube - Duc is a coincidence.
        Today you scare that this is a war right away. Well war, so what? First or last, or what? 1 warheads on 500 carriers on each side. Of 700 carriers, 700% will not take off due to malfunctions, the same number will take off, but will not fly and self-destruct in flight due to the same malfunctions. Another 20% will be poorly and poorly destroyed by both sides' missile defense. Total reaches only 20%. The warning system works, the population is not relaxed, as in Hiroshima, but hid in the subway and basements, bomb shelters and others. What is the result? Millions of 40-20 on each side? Yes, I reason cynically, yes, but I also state that there will be no universal catastrophe, the planet will not split, and so on. Two superpowers that have undermined themselves will go to the sidelines, other powers that are geographically remote and therefore not affected will come to the fore.
        I understand, I would not want to. BUT!!!!!! But even if they are afraid, we are already tired of being afraid! For the sake of detente, they destroyed the USSR, like, tired of keeping the world in the balance, let us tell the amers that we are not enemies, even prove this - we will withdraw troops from Afghanistan, destroy the Berlin Wall ... And what? Enough !!!! Their turn to be afraid !!!! Having lost 25 population limits each, we will survive again, our grandfathers taught us how to do this. I have a bag of one and the other in my basement, and many also started to fall asleep. But the Americans will survive? I doubt they are unusual and kelly, so they should be afraid. But the war does not need to frighten us, the Jamaican monetary system must be destroyed, it will be destroyed. The dollar must be banished - it will be banished. Should the US become a second-rate power because of its geographical distance? Logically, this should have happened, why would a dog make a hook? But the US itself does not think so - hence their activity. And the United States will become a second-rate power in the middle of nowhere, crowded with Detroit. The topic is closed.
        1. 0
          5 May 2014 17: 05
          Excellent words, I wish God still had them in my ears for speedy EXECUTION!
    2. koshh
      0
      5 May 2014 16: 38
      Quote: Little Muck
      The blow has to be applied not "under the gut", but to die. Enough polites.

      Is logical. And then the author himself reproaches for half measures, he himself first offers to finish to the end.
  3. +12
    5 May 2014 12: 07
    Well, actually there is nothing so revolutionary in the article ... YES the economy is at the heart of wars.

    Suffice it to recall that according to the results of the Second World War, three quarters of the world's gold reserves moved to the United States ... that’s the reason.
    1. +1
      5 May 2014 13: 09
      Quote: Little Muck
      The blow has to be applied not "under the gut", but to die. Enough polites.


      They cannot die alone, they will pull us along. But to embed so as not to pound, I think it is necessary.
      And they need to pull a little gold too.
      1. -1
        5 May 2014 13: 24
        Quote: SS68SS
        And they need to pull a little gold too.

        Dear, where is the gold coin? What, loot is primary for you?
        But on account, they are dragged away after themselves, dust will swallow and nuclear weapons will not help. hi
        1. 0
          5 May 2014 16: 28
          Money is only a way of concentration of forces, means and labor of a person. Concentrated more effort, labor (money) in some business will get a greater result than the rest.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      5 May 2014 13: 25
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Well, actually there is nothing so revolutionary in the article ... YES the economy is at the heart of wars.

      Suffice it to recall that according to the results of the Second World War, three quarters of the world's gold reserves moved to the United States ... that’s the reason.

      It was worth remembering the binding of oil to the dollar - this radically changes the idea of ​​the value of currencies - the dollar and the euro. It should be said: what are the volumes of trade in reserve currencies; what are gold - the currency reserves of the Central Banks of countries denominated in dollars and euros. Everything would fall into place. Yes, and they refused the gold standard back in 1944. (Refused - more precisely. - De Gaulle (Charles André Joseph Marie de Gaulle) ask! He was a smart man. And a patriot ...)
  4. +3
    5 May 2014 12: 08
    Just did not understand the phrase:
    The outcome of the resolution of global global economic problems ... was a war

    I would ask to translate. But as I thought earlier, revolutions and wars are a tool for expanding the market. They encouraged revolutions -> redistributed enterprises -> reset the economy -> put them on a credit needle -> people buy what they don't produce. If you do not give in, you will get a war.

    True, there are controversial points:
    First of all, Russia, China ... switch to a new type of currency system based on a single currency

    He who prints money rules the country. The single currency is, in fact, one management.
    Maybe not in a single currency, but in its own, but by other standards?

    it is necessary to create a buffer between the West and the East, so as not to make the mistake of Joseph Stalin, which he made in the 1939-1940-years, starting the Baltic annexation to the USSR and participating in the divisions of Poland and Romania

    If Stalin had not captured these countries, Germany would have entered. The buffer would not work.
    Until recently, Ukraine was such a buffer, but now it will not.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      5 May 2014 12: 44
      The key to geopolitical stability is a new economic system

      What is stability? In the sense of the article, the transition to a new economic system is possible only as a result of a new world war.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      5 May 2014 12: 46
      Quote: MainBeam
      Maybe not in a single currency, but in its own, but by other standards?

      Right. Each economy has its own currency, as independent as possible and provided with a real product! General agreements will drag on for decades with uncertain prospects. From the west it is necessary to close unambiguously. A temporary drop in living standards and consumption will allow the future to survive as a nation and state. So this is not the price through which not to step over. The people in Russia are smart - we’ll understand why we will suffer financially. Well, who doesn’t understand ... it’s easier to explain that it’s neither time nor place. One thin spot is fair distribution, i.e. narrowing the income gap between strata of the population. This is critically important for Russia.
  5. +7
    5 May 2014 12: 08
    So far we have an OLD system, the essence of which is financial openness to the West, which washes away a significant part of our national heritage. With such a "system" we will not see victory.
    Stalin was absolutely right, the borders of the USSR were the NATURAL borders of the empire, and he created the buffer zone from the countries of central Europe in Poland, the Czech Republic, the German Democratic Republic, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria. Only the bald Khrushchev created the Warsaw Pact and set up a stupid confrontation, which Stalin was not going to do.
  6. +7
    5 May 2014 12: 11
    . But do they still understand all this in due volume in Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, Caracas and other capitals of countries from the "risk group" ?! I'm afraid not yet.


    Put a plus, but the quote killed. He alone saw the truth!

    This is already every baby knows.
  7. +1
    5 May 2014 12: 11
    It is high time for us to get rid of green papers and send the whole Euroband to the forest!
  8. Gagarin
    +2
    5 May 2014 12: 13
    Any system sooner or later but ends.
    Apparently we are now on the verge of global global change.
    1. +3
      5 May 2014 12: 17
      Quote: Gagarin
      Apparently we are now on the verge of global global change.

      Apparently ???? We are ALREADY located in the center of the maelstrom and we can’t bounce off like a conflict on 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX. Now either with a shield, or on a shield.
      1. koshh
        0
        5 May 2014 18: 51
        Quote: Orik
        Now either with a shield, or on a shield.

        That's for sure, everything is already in the whirlpool.
  9. +2
    5 May 2014 12: 14
    It's time to move from words to deeds!
  10. +1
    5 May 2014 12: 17
    everything is correct ..... it is necessary to destroy the system while there is time, in the West they understand this very well and will try to remove the threat .... we have very little time, we need to start inside the country .... giving up the dollar, clearing agents of influence, support of patriotic moods and changing moral values ​​of the population ... the idea of ​​peaceful solutions to conflicts is inspired from outside, the world is considered only with real power, I am afraid that the only deterrent was and remains a nuclear weapon, as a result of the strengthening of the nuclear component .....
  11. +1
    5 May 2014 12: 17
    Nothing new. This has long been written a lot. For example, M. L. Khazin has much to say about this
  12. +4
    5 May 2014 12: 19
    "We are on the verge of global change and, possibly, global conflict."- I really can’t agree with anything. The conflict between Russia and the Anglo-Saxons was always present, only the phases were changing, now the time has come for ARCHIactive.
  13. +2
    5 May 2014 12: 23
    Suffice it to recall that according to the results of World War II, three quarters of the world's gold reserves moved to the United States. and disappeared ...
    It is necessary to beat painfully, and at the same time smile, smile like Merkel, Obama, etc.
  14. +5
    5 May 2014 12: 24
    Only now, when it came to sanctions, wise heads in the government realized that the country's food, industrial, economic and financial security was not just empty sounds. Gratitude and the Order of Obama for this.
  15. +5
    5 May 2014 12: 27
    The article is very correct. Political economy should be taught to everyone, and only those who know at least its basics understand that all evil comes from "bankers" and "financiers". Banking and finance and in our country is the most closed and influential club, which actually controls everything. And a rare president can rise to understand this and "fly to the middle of the Dnieper."
  16. +3
    5 May 2014 12: 31
    Active offensive tactics in any fight are the key to success. Therefore, it is enough to look back at the so-called democratic world, we must create situations ourselves, and not adapt to them.
  17. Igmail
    +1
    5 May 2014 12: 36
    Quote: Ptah
    Let whoever considers it "offtopic", but each of you, understanding and caring people, who are also familiar with IT technologies, on the eve of the Great HOLIDAY, give a gift.

    Put a St. George ribbon on your avatars.
    I beg -

    http://gl9may.ru/avatar


    Friends compatriots I ask those who are not indifferent to the Ukrainian events to vote on the site:
    https://secure.avaaz.org/ru/petition/Evropeyskiy_sud_po_pravam_cheloveka_ESPCh_M
    y_prizyvaem_ESPCh_priznat_prestupleniya_Ukrainy_protiv_sobstvennyh_grazhdan /? aWT
    pvhb
    1. +1
      5 May 2014 12: 46
      Already done. good soldier
      I’m a permanent signer there. The effectiveness of these actions is doubtful. But it won’t leave me, but Suddenly help at least someone. what
      Let people or poor animals, or forests on the planet.
      Good deal !!! fellow
  18. +1
    5 May 2014 12: 39
    Oh, there were times before, not like this current "Sabbat of Witches".
  19. zav
    0
    5 May 2014 12: 41
    "First of all, Russia, China, Iran, the CIS and Latin America should abandon the Jamaican monetary system"

    Firstly, nothing will work out, because too many countries will have to be persuaded and it is clear that no one will persuade anyone.
    Secondly, because the factor of confrontation and opposition on the part of Western countries still remains, and what this confrontation will result in is not known to anyone for certain.
    Thirdly, it is not a fact that the countries listed by the author, having gained strength, gaining dignity, strength and great weight, will adhere to a gentleman's set of tools in the conduct of their affairs. After all, their own oligarchs will grow up, whose habits will be no better than the habits of the "Rothschilds." This means that they will be loved in about the same way as the United States is "loved" now.
    Therefore, one must act differently. That is, to agree with the powers that be (with the West) on the reorganization of world affairs - after all, it cannot be that there are no sane people there. Because you can’t wait any longer: the earth will be killed either by a killed ecology, or by the greenhouse effect, or a conflict like the Ukrainian one that has rolled down to the World War, or overpopulation, or something like that, otherwise taken together, coinciding in time.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  20. +5
    5 May 2014 12: 49
    I almost completely agree with the authorities regarding foreign policy, but strongly disagree with the oligarchic economy within the country. Crimea. New Russia, we will collect some more lands. And we, ordinary people, will pay for everything in one way or another, but not in any case not Abramovich and Prokhorov, they will also earn some money.
    1. 0
      5 May 2014 12: 59
      Quote: FC Skif
      And we, ordinary people, will pay

      Naturally!

      I was driving behind a dirty dump truck with a finger written "Crimea is ours!" And I thought that this Crimea gave the driver, in addition to a new financial burden? No, I understand that some values ​​are not measured in money. But now I'm talking about the financial side of things. There is already a precedent when teachers in secondary schools began to be given lower salaries, motivating the need to increase salaries for teachers in the Crimea. And this is only the visible side of the coin.
      1. 0
        5 May 2014 13: 06
        Quote: MainBeam
        "Crimea is ours!" And I thought that this Crimea gave the driver, besides a new financial burden?

        good And still the very "little". I believe that one day our people will not leave us either. He will stretch out his hand and pull it out of the ass, into which we, through our own thoughtlessness, or through a stranger’s misunderstanding, fell ... hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +3
        5 May 2014 13: 08
        Mainbeam
        There is already a precedent when teachers in secondary schools began to be given lower salaries, motivating the need to increase salaries for teachers in the Crimea.

        This was voiced by Putin!
        To which he replied that this was complete nonsense!
        The state has enough funds. The salary of teachers is the responsibility of the regional authorities. And on such facts there will be a hard debriefing!
  21. 0
    5 May 2014 13: 04
    The modern monetary system is incapable, it’s understandable, but how the question will change. Owners of the Fed are more likely to reform their brainchild into something else than allow other countries to come to an agreement and throw themselves. Not for this it was conceived, not for that there are agents of influence . It would be nice, of course, to take in the introduction of the gold ruble and sell resources for it. The question is whether it will work out.
  22. Orc-xnumx
    0
    5 May 2014 13: 07
    Good article!
  23. leo44
    0
    5 May 2014 13: 11
    I have always had and always will have a special view on all the geopolitical problems of our time. Namely, I always proceed in my assessments a priori from the economy, and not from politics, the military component or any other factors. That is, the economy is primary, and everything else is secondary.
    With all due respect to the author - reason and conscience are primary - this is in the normal case. And if the author is a political observer, he is aware of the statement:
    Now we are on the verge of World War III
    ??? Why, in the absence of work with the population on civil defense (civil defense), to scare the townsfolk with such phrases>? For what purpose is it being done - so that they run and buy gas masks, salt and matches? I think such phrases should be commented on by the government of the state. And this with all my deep respect for the editorial board.
  24. arch_kate3
    +1
    5 May 2014 13: 14
    Yes, the economic system must change, but without a fight, the money changers must not give up! We need not only a new equivalent of currency, but also new laws for the distribution of means and remuneration of labor and goods. Those who work, creating real benefits, must win, and speculators to tail!
  25. +1
    5 May 2014 13: 26
    The talkhouse on this topic is already a little heated! Where are the visible steps or at least hints?
  26. +1
    5 May 2014 13: 31
    Talking cannot help, action is needed ...
  27. Kelnot
    +1
    5 May 2014 13: 47
    I will propose the fourth point, the most optimal in my opinion, to remove this whole family of Rothschilds and Rockefellers. And that's why, the first three moments will cause, if not the Third, then the Fourth World War, because they will not sit and watch how the first, second and third moments are embodied in reality.
  28. +3
    5 May 2014 13: 52
    For a long time I have been waiting for an article on a similar topic, thanks to the author! However, I agree with the comment above (Sunjar) that economics cannot be separated from ideology. You can earn money honestly, you can not honestly, or you can steal it, seize it, this, of course, if you exaggerate, but the process does not in the least depend on ideology. Capitalism is immoral not to a small extent because income, profit, are more important than morality, hence all the hypocrisy, cynicism of duplicity. In my opinion, the Jamaican monetary system should not only oppose its own, in the interests of Russia, but also base its financial system on social justice, the primacy of the development of society as a species, over an individual, and personal egoism. This is already a topic of socialist development, without changing morality, we will still get the dictates of an obese and insolent minority over society, even if it is not the Jamaican, but the Nanai or Moscow financial system, where the Rothschilds and Rockefellers will be replaced by the ghouls of the local spill. But, we must start, we must take the first step and move decisively, otherwise Russia will again pay with its own funds and lives for the bankrupts from the world financial "casino", all these transnational "old money lenders", currency speculators from exchange trading, dodgers from all kinds of financial pyramids ... Enough to bend under the rotten West, it's time to change your life for the better, not forgetting about morality, justice and spirituality, without this the "dragon", the power of Satan, will again win in the soul.
  29. DPN
    +1
    5 May 2014 13: 53
    The article is correct in everything. Having replaced the social - system, we are in the cap - system. We got involved in the most I do not want. We give energy for pieces of paper that are not unsecured. Naturally, after any mess we will wipe the ass with these pieces of paper on another, they will not work.
  30. +2
    5 May 2014 14: 00
    You can’t help the case with conversations, but in my memory, these conversations are enough. States and Eureka will never agree to this and will resist until the physical destruction of the initiators ...
  31. 0
    5 May 2014 14: 25
    "The result of the resolution of global world economic problems until now has always been a war. The First and Second World Wars were caused precisely by economic factors, and then by the factors of geopolitics. Who and whom" threw up "there is, of course, a special conversation. But at the fore there was the economy: sales markets, resources, etc., and then everything else "

    Enchanting! Which "sales markets" in 1914 did not Germany share with the Entente? What resources did not Germany receive from the USSR in 1941?

    "At the same time, to introduce a real price for the export of raw materials to Western countries. Iran has long followed this path. Now it is up to the rest."

    Well, now the price is not real? At a cost in Iran of 3 bucks per barrel?

    "The third point is military-political: it is necessary to create a buffer between the West and the East, so as not to make the mistake of Joseph Stalin, which he made in 1939-1940, when he began the annexation of the Baltic States to the USSR and participated in the partition of Poland and Romania. states are needed "

    Well, where are these "BUFFER" states today? Just don't say that in Karaganda they are in NATO. Without Stalin. With the connivance of EBN.
    Wash Klava. crying
  32. 3vs
    0
    5 May 2014 14: 39
    "But do Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, Caracas and other capitals of countries from the" risk group "still understand all this in due volume ?! I'm afraid not yet."
    The opera house, the Nobel laureate in economics has drawn!
    Somehow uncle Vova prompt competent comrades.
  33. Manul49
    0
    5 May 2014 16: 09
    Yes, everyone understands everything.
    It’s just that the Russians are harnessing for a long time ...
  34. 0
    5 May 2014 16: 16
    the author is right that "something needs to be done", but he is wrong in his proposals, like:
    First of all, Russia, China, Iran, the CIS countries and Latin America should abandon the Jamaican currency system and switch to a new type of currency system based on a single currency that has material support (even if it is not gold, but simply an objective index of industrial production). Accordingly, all transactions between these countries should be carried out in this currency with a complete rejection of the dollar and the euro.

    The second point is also economic: it is necessary to abandon the import of goods and services from Western countries as much as possible (developing economic cooperation primarily with each other), as well as completely limit the activities of Western financial institutions.

    You can’t forcefully introduce a new one: the business is designed so that when it jumps, it goes bankrupt. We need an evolutionary, gradual transition, i.e. it is impossible to prohibit, but it is necessary to recommend and convince ... Try to prove the benefits of switching to new money: if only because the reliability and stability of the dollar system has fallen dramatically, and the risks are growing and may become prohibitive.
  35. 0
    5 May 2014 19: 18
    It’s not for nothing that Americans received the Nobel in economics;
  36. +1
    5 May 2014 19: 56
    political scientist completely illiterate !!! he does not see that the world is multipolar
    and that you can avoid war! next-first economic war
  37. +1
    6 May 2014 01: 11
    Well, GDP is also not the first day at the helm!
    He knows everything, owns everything, understands everything and almost everything can.
    Not evening means. It’s like with the deployment of troops to the southeast. It would be desirable and necessary but ...
    It is necessary to think ahead a little further - tomorrow.
    I think that if he had the opportunity, he would not have kept us waiting and shouting from his actions.
    One Crimea is worth it.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"