Military Review

Liberal literary machine

23
Liberal literary machineMaxim Kantor, an elite artist and writer, became famous in our book “Red Light” with an opinion, unusual for his liberal circle, about Stalin. A pier is not a serial killer maniac for whom we haven’t been able to pay the world without the outside world, but an effective leader of his era. But it was enough to smell fried in Ukraine, he immediately, as demanded by that liberal circle, addressed Putin with an appeal “Stop”:


“No ambition, no interest does not matter in the face of blasphemous war. The question is not about borders, not about missile bases, not about NATO. The question is so important that geopolitical calculations are near him. We cannot allow war between the Ukrainian and Russian peoples ... ”


But this peace-loving would not go with his message to Obama - someone with the hands of the Ukrainian nations who are openly patronized by him and kindles a Ukrainian fire! It kindles that, under such a threat, Russia should be returned to the cycles on which, under Yeltsin, it went before the United States. Why should Putin be stopped while doing this?

Yes, because you can understand that if Putin surrenders, Obama will have no one to fight with right away! And this is true: if every time, with the threat of war, one of the parties would forget its ambitions and geopolitical interests, there would be no wars in the world at all! As well as these forgetful sides themselves. Smirin Lincoln is his ambition, there would be no bloody US civil war. Humble before Washington before the punitive British expedition, there would not be the United States themselves!

But this, my opponents will immediately correct me, America! God ordered her to unleash war for the sake of her ambitions and to shed blood, but not Russia! This is actually the whole liberal idea in its dry residue, so to speak - to which Kantor returned, having spent a little while “for the Motherland, for Stalin”. He appealed to the public with an unorthodox look at the Soviet history - after which he spoke as the most orthodox liberal demanding our capitulation for any reason!

But here, it seems to me, there is nothing strange: the old “Hour hour principle” is in effect, since the heyday of our “free press” in 90's, driven into its foundation. Then "MK", ​​"AIF" and other "Izvestia" until the time they wrote who in that much, inspiring the public the illusion of their complete liberty. But he only beat the “hour of H” - for example, Yeltsin’s election in 1996, as everyone blew a trumpet in one voice: “Vote or lose! Yeltsin — or death! ”The task, under which they were released for temporary loose housing, was carried out — and returned again to their discord.

For the same notes, Kantor also played his part, sent from the camp of the liberals to the present “patriotic” field. By bloating away from their main dogma, the payment of indemnities to the West “for everything” by the same liberals, I gained fame of honest little. But only the “hour of H” came, hit the alarm for which he had sent. De, we must disarm before the heavily armed America, returning the status quo with which the last quarter century has been retreating under the humanitarian slogan "If only there was no war!"

At the same time, the "fraternal Ukraine" States used, as in my youth, the young hooligans: "Well, go and take that uncle!" The little fellow is rude to the passerby, his ear, after which the entire codla moves out of the doorway: Well, take off your watch! ”

But also from the antiwar side, as the whole world experience teaches, any deviation is the shortest way to war! The United States, like Hitler, never stopped before the defeat of a weak enemy - and did not bomb only those who, like Iran, China, North Korea, were ready to render selfless resistance. And today we have to retreat under this Cantor peacemaking - just pushing our borders, where a new conflict will be lit tomorrow, demanding new concessions. And the same literary typewriter of the liberals will again call upon to reconcile our ambitions and geopolitical interests - if only there was no war again. And so, what is called, ad infinitum. More precisely, until we are dismembered, as the former Yugoslavia - or as the current Ukraine, dismembered as a prelude to our further ambe.

However, on the occasion of the Ukrainian events, our press intellectuals for the most part nevertheless sang together in the opposite Cantor fashion - for Putin, against Obama. But I have no doubt that this rare unity befell them not by virtue of some confluence of astrals, but because Putin finally intercepted these settings for the “hour of H”. That is how they should have pressed their testicles with their leader, the Nightingale, - not that they would have ruined anyone in that much. Even Khakamada, the eternal opponent of the regime, deprived of this male clue, spoke at the meeting with Putin correctly - causing the anger of those who act on the other grips.

That's actually all the freedom of speech, acquired in all our democratic years. Where you will turn her dyshl - there and left; depending on the payment scenario, its singers are ready to serve both the fifth column and the very first of the patriotic ones. They can not stand the real loose-minded content categorically, immediately slipping into freedom in the service of the one who gives more.

The fish is looking for where it is deeper, and not by the ears of an intellectual who is in love with his Homeland, which is better for fish in the image of a fish. This or that branch of service is fame, exhibitions, grants, Booker and anti-Booker prizes; and the rejection of it is the bitter grass of oblivion. So the casket of the current intellectual protest or approval is revealed: who is feeding there, who is there.

Which, by the way, was not so fully in the USSR, where, with all the clutter, true truthful bearers were found - not for fear and money, but for conscience. But with the ensuing freedom, they swam away somewhere, giving way to such Cantors and Solov'evs, singing purely on the notes indicated to them. Maybe when they sing as it should, this is not bad - but what is the lesson for all the others, who, equaling themselves to the nation’s thin conscience, are less and less willing to honestly serve the Motherland!

That is, something we have with this freedom is not gone, but why - the devil knows. Probably, the authorities are somehow guilty: they didn’t so tied or untied this intellectual flock. Only then the question is: what kind of intelligentsia is that, without a leash, runs immediately to the fifth column and is ready to serve at least to whom for a good surcharge!
Author:
Originator:
http://roslyakov.ru/cntnt/verhneemen/novye_publ/literaturn.html
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ya.seliwerstov2013
    ya.seliwerstov2013 April 28 2014 18: 35
    +35
    A new teacher comes to class:

    - My name is Abram Davidovich, I am a liberal. And now everybody get up in turn and introduce yourself as I do.

    - My name is Masha, I am a liberal.

    - My name is Styopa, I am a liberal.

    - Me Vovochka, I am a Stalinist.

    - Little Johnny, why are you a Stalinist ?!

    - My mother is a Stalinist, my dad is a Stalinist, my friends are Stalinists and I am also a Stalinist.

    - Little Johnny, and if your mother was a prostitute, your dad was a drug addict, and your friends would be a pid @ races, who would you be then ?!

    “Then I would definitely be a liberal.”
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov April 28 2014 18: 43
      +12
      At the same time, the "fraternal Ukraine" States used, as in my youth, the young hooligans: "Well, go and take that uncle!" The little fellow is rude to the passerby, his ear, after which the entire codla moves out of the doorway: Well, take off your watch! ”
      A very accurate comparison .. The world "Caudle" is just doing this ..! But this will not work with Russia! On Russia "crumble loaf" you can not "beguiled rams" ..)))
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Spnsr
      Spnsr April 28 2014 19: 47
      +2
      either I don’t know something about Solovyov, I didn’t listen before, or the author has a personal dislike for him, but my impression of Solovyov, it seemed to me that he was a radical, criticizes both the authorities and the common man, though he treats his people very loyally , politely, although the zlobin sometimes sticks out so that he does not relax. as well as the article is not a plus, not a minus, somewhere the author -> author -> the author is right, but somewhere, not connected with the nightingale, he goes too far
  2. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 April 28 2014 18: 38
    +24
    Yes they went liberals:
    As the late Lev Gumilyov said
    “A TV interviewer once asked Lev Gumilyov:
    - Lev Nikolaevich, are you an intellectual?
    And Gumilyov soared:
    - God save me! The present intelligentsia is such a spiritual sect. What is characteristic: they don’t know anything, they don’t know anything, but they judge everything and completely disagree with dissent ... ”

    Then the people were told the "truth about the war"
    Now they have taken over Crimea, only people know perfectly well who is who.
    1. mamont5
      mamont5 April 28 2014 19: 42
      +13
      Quote: Novel 1977
      As the late Lev Gumilyov said
      “A TV interviewer once asked Lev Gumilyov:
      - Lev Nikolaevich, are you an intellectual?
      And Gumilyov soared:
      - God save me! The present intelligentsia is such a spiritual sect. What is characteristic: they don’t know anything, they don’t know anything, but they judge everything and completely disagree with dissent ... ”


      Yes, it was. And, it seems, A.P. Chekhov, answered the same question: "I am not an intellectual - I have a profession."

      And here is what Plehve said about intellectuals: “That part of our public, in
      dormitory called the Russian intelligentsia, has one, mainly her
      inherent feature: she perceives in principle and enthusiastically
      every idea, every fact, even rumor, aimed at discrediting
      state, as well as spiritual orthodox power, to everything else
      it is indifferent in the life of the country. "

      And here are the words of the military historian, General Staff, Major General E. I. Martynov, who was later killed by the Bolsheviks): "Try to ask our intellectuals questions: what is war, patriotism, army, military specialty, military valor? Ninety out of a hundred will answer you: war is crime, patriotism is a relic of antiquity, the army is the main brake on progress, the military profession is a shameful trade, military valor is a manifestation of stupidity and atrocity ... "
      Is it any wonder that in 1905, Russian intellectuals sent
      telegrams to the Japanese Mikado, congratulating him on the victory over Russia? "
      1. aksakal
        aksakal April 28 2014 20: 50
        +6
        Quote: mamont5
        "Try to ask our intellectuals questions: what is war, patriotism, army, military specialty, military valor? Ninety out of a hundred will answer you: war is a crime, patriotism is a relic of antiquity, the army is the main brake on progress, military specialty is a shameful craft, military valor - a manifestation of stupidity and atrocity ... "
        - Well, since such a booze started, then I like a white jackal will go and hit the intelligentsia, but just for the company, everybody beat and I beat laughing
        I speak, of course, of the intelligentsia. - A bunch of revolutionaries walked from house to house and knocked on every door: “Everything to the street! It's a shame to sit at home! ” - and all the consciousnesses poured out onto the square, lame, blind, armless: not one was left at home. For half a century they hustled in the square, wailing and moving. At home - dirt, poverty, a mess, but the owner is not up to it. It is in public, it saves the people - and yes it is easier and more entertaining than the black work at home. Nobody lived, everyone did (or pretended to be) a public cause. They didn’t even live selfishly, did not enjoy life, did not freely enjoy its pleasures, but snatched pieces and swallowed almost without chewing, ashamed and lusting together like a mischievous dog. It was a kind of strange asceticism, not a renunciation of a personal sensual life, but a renunciation of its leadership. She walked on her own, through a stump-deck, sullenly and convulsively.
        - this is Gershenzon, a thinker and philosopher of the same troubled time. Fuf, it seems, too, flashed laughing
        1. Turkir
          Turkir April 29 2014 00: 24
          0
          Gershenzon - thinker and philosopher?
          Wow, but I was thinking of Socrates, Plato, Seneca, or, at worst, some Dostoevsky there.
          But it turns out that all these gentlemen whom I read are damned, corrupt intellectuals, they thought with their heads. I had to read others, well, those who do not think, but just earn money, honest hard workers.
          These mathematicians are freaking, who do nothing, only calculate, physicists loafers, just measure something, and all these designers on whom all these technical developments and documentation depend. These are those who create weapons. Well, that’s it, intellectuals, the fifth column, all the boots are licking.
          Thank God I saw my sight, now they can and should be kicked out in the USA, let them work there for these Obamaites, and we can do without them without these corrupt INTELLIGENTS.
          I confess, I took an example from them, but now I will write only URA-PATRIOTIC comments in the style of: Long live Emperor Franz Joseph! All to the war!
          1. nezabor
            nezabor April 29 2014 02: 11
            +2
            You deftly changed concepts and made false bindings.
            Quote: Turkir
            These mathematicians are freaking, who do nothing, only calculate, physicists loafers, just measure something, and all these designers on whom all these technical developments and documentation depend. These are those who create weapons. Well, that’s it, intellectuals, the fifth column, all the boots are licking.


            Only the "intelligentsia", at least the one that now calls itself such, considers physicists in the laboratory, mathematicians in the department, technicians at the drawing board, doctors at a patient, teachers in front of children - nothing else than quilted jackets! And the "intelligentsia" is now considered to be the one who is in the zh.o.pu. Hollows and goes to dinners at the embassies of the Senior Historical Scientist of Stania ...

            So Turkir, there is no need to use verbiage here and look for the weak minds of the "Sharikovs"
            1. Turkir
              Turkir April 29 2014 09: 12
              -1
              You and I are engaged in verbiage and demagogy.
              This is you, speak the language that was invented for you in other countries.
              It is you who ascribe to me your thoughts and it is important to refute them.
              This is there, the words scoop and quilted jacket were invented for you, and they call themselves intellectuals. They are the ones who swallow the vowels and say "message" instead of a message.
              And I think, I speak and write in Russian, and the Sharikovs are those who do not speak Russian, these are those who do not even understand what they read.
            2. aksakal
              aksakal 4 May 2014 14: 17
              0
              Quote: nezabor
              Only the "intelligentsia", at least the one that now calls itself such, considers physicists in the laboratory, mathematicians in the department, technicians at the drawing board, doctors at a patient, teachers in front of children - nothing else than quilted jackets! And the "intelligentsia" is now considered to be the one who is in the zh.op.u. he also goes to dinners at the embassies of the psi.s.s. of Stania ... So Turkir, there is no need to talk about it here and look for the weak minds of the "Sharikovs"

              - good drinks I could not have better say smile
  3. mirag2
    mirag2 April 28 2014 18: 39
    +5
    At the end of the 19th century, the intelligentsia of Russia (the real Russian intelligentsia) began a movement "to the people", "facing the people" - the books of that time, cry, and self-flagellation. Reproaches to Russia, etc., such as that the people were muzzled like that edge.
    So the next "Russian intelligentsia" that appeared after the revolution (Bolsheviks without a homeland and peasants who manage state institutions) -that is what the current liberals grew out of them, who are looking for blame for our people, and people studied the classics in schools, and think that this is a real intelligentsia, for it is a little like the scourging of Russia, and the search for guilt in front of someone.
    Drive the liberals to the fifth column!
    The war has begun — either we or they (the west) —and they don’t choose the means in the war!
  4. delfinN
    delfinN April 28 2014 18: 40
    +6
    Powdered in the brains of the people
  5. 11111mail.ru
    11111mail.ru April 28 2014 19: 07
    +5
    "Intelligentsia and power" is a very difficult task:
    Either bite the boot, or lick.
    T.S. Shaov
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Giant thought
    Giant thought April 28 2014 19: 16
    +6
    Liberals, these are bedbugs, parasites on the body of Russia, sos.sut her blood, at the same time hating her. And start to push, it will immediately stink ...
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. upasika1918
    upasika1918 April 28 2014 19: 30
    +3
    The brain is a complicated thing.
  10. skifd
    skifd April 28 2014 19: 40
    +14
    I can’t stand it for a long time. Now that's it, the limit.
    1. ittr
      ittr April 28 2014 19: 57
      +6
      Svinadze and spelled Svinadze
      1. 11111mail.ru
        11111mail.ru April 29 2014 05: 01
        +1
        Quote: ytr
        Svinadze and spelled Svinadze

        Porkjo, not to be confused with pork, poisonous, but prolific. Fruits his own kind.
    2. Stavros
      Stavros April 28 2014 19: 58
      +4
      Yes, send him to his historic homeland, let him get clever there.
    3. persei
      persei April 28 2014 21: 40
      +1
      such jo ... need to be sent to their historical homeland ....
    4. mirag2
      mirag2 April 28 2014 22: 52
      +2
      That bastard, I won’t even try to understand what he meant, the inability to say that Stalin is bad, or what?
      Full of nonsense and nonsense.
      So the most important thing for him to say is that Stalin planted his dad as a searchlight and embezzler of state funds for nothing?
    5. Nikolav
      Nikolav 14 May 2014 12: 21
      0
      Aha! And it will also suit him: "Transfer the imperialist war to the Civil war." Ghoul.
  11. otec
    otec April 28 2014 19: 44
    +1
    They’ve already completely smoked themselves ... probably they started to inject !!! laughing
  12. gandalf
    gandalf April 28 2014 20: 00
    +5
    The intellectual forces of the workers and peasants are growing and gaining strength in the struggle for the overthrow of the bourgeoisie and its accomplices, intellectuals, lackeys of capital, who imagine themselves to be the brains of the nation. In fact, this is not the brain, but shit.

    IN AND. Lenin
  13. sledge
    sledge April 28 2014 20: 15
    +5
    We have no liberals, we have Liberasts (an explosive mixture of liberals and p-derasts)
  14. free
    free April 28 2014 20: 27
    +3
    it's time to call the fifth column to account!
  15. Lukich
    Lukich April 28 2014 21: 24
    +6
    yeah, too much foam got out. probably it’s time to apply this penalty and sanctions in the form of deprivation of their citizenship
    1. persei
      persei April 28 2014 21: 45
      +4
      I fully support ... as I read it. LJ is so hunting ... eh ... Especially Grigory Shalvovich Chkhartishvili ... who pours dirt on everything and everyone ... These dze, shvili ... adze ... those that don’t they want to listen to the majority opinion, do not accept our ideology and politics ... must go to Saakashvili
  16. Yugra
    Yugra April 28 2014 22: 21
    +4
    But Russian liberalism, a war happened, ready-made policemen and elders, just like during the war ...
    1. Quantum
      Quantum April 29 2014 06: 04
      0
      It is surprising that these liberals call themselves conscience
      nation! The question is what?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Nikolav
      Nikolav 14 May 2014 12: 22
      0
      This one, on the right, is now ready to head the puppet government!
  17. voliador
    voliador April 28 2014 22: 26
    +1
    Liberast like pid @ rast - good only when dead laughing .
  18. Turkir
    Turkir April 28 2014 23: 09
    +1
    Only then, the question is: what kind of intelligentsia is it, which immediately escapes into the fifth column without a leash and is ready to serve at least someone for a good surcharge!

    Some kind of game is strange, something like checkers with itself.
    First, we will call a certain Mr. Kantor an intellectual (he wrote a book, Thaddeus Bulgarin also mumbled), and then quickly generalizing the actions of Mr. Kantor, i.e. reseated in a chair opposite and already playing against himself, we ask a thoughtful question: What is this .. see quote above.
    The author of the article noticed one interesting feature of these "truth-lovers", and in my opinion, the fifth column, which, by definition, was NEVER intelligent, but consisted of idlers paid by the CIA: they immediately rush with reproaches not to hooligans-politicians, but to the injured party !
    They want to hit or rob you on the street, you are going to defend yourself, and such a Cantor runs up to YOU ​​and says that if you do this, he will testify against you, as the instigator of the conflict. Such cantors are provocateurs, well paid and already with dual citizenship.
    This is an interesting topic that has not been sufficiently developed in this article.
    And, do not, every citizen, with a known number of passports, to call an intellectual, this is a big ERROR or even more than an error: it is the Cantors who call themselves intellectuals.
    ----------------------
    But the intelligentsia did not run away and does not run away; it is always with the people, because it is itself from the people.
  19. Revolver
    Revolver April 29 2014 02: 44
    0
    and they did not bomb only those who, like Iran, China, North Korea, were ready to render a selfless rebuff.

    Even as they bombed.
    Iran - by the hands of Saddam Hussein, while this cykin's son was "our cykin's son." If he didn’t want to be his own cykin’s son at one far from wonderful moment, he would still rule in Baghdad and, honestly, everyone would be better off from this.
    China - by the hands of the Chiang Kai-shek. There was no luck, the Maoists were stronger, they kicked the Chiang Kai-shekists to Taiwan.
    DPRK - bombed themselves, just under the UN flag. And whose planes were still shot down by Wang Yu Shin and Li Si Tzin?
    Affap still forgot to mention Vietnam. These were bombed more than those three combined, although they again resisted more than those combined. But I didn’t mention it, because it does not fit into the concept.
    So the message is incorrect.

    PS
    I am not going to blame or justify these bombings, I just mention them as historical facts.
  20. Polarfox
    Polarfox April 29 2014 06: 55
    0
    Today, the intelligentsia is not the same:
    1. thunder1949
      thunder1949 April 29 2014 07: 16
      0
      Fisting is my fist sexual intercourse. Bravo Klitschko !!!!
    2. redcod
      redcod April 29 2014 13: 19
      0
      From Wikipedia.
      Fisting (from the English fist - fist) is a sexual practice [1], which involves the introduction of several fingers (finger) or the fist of one or more hands into the vagina or anus.
  21. thunder1949
    thunder1949 April 29 2014 07: 14
    0
    Quote: mamont5
    Quote: Novel 1977
    As the late Lev Gumilyov said
    “A TV interviewer once asked Lev Gumilyov:
    - Lev Nikolaevich, are you an intellectual?
    And Gumilyov soared:
    - God save me! The present intelligentsia is such a spiritual sect. What is characteristic: they don’t know anything, they don’t know anything, but they judge everything and completely disagree with dissent ... ”


    Yes, it was. And, it seems, A.P. Chekhov, answered the same question: "I am not an intellectual - I have a profession."

    And here is what Plehve said about intellectuals: “That part of our public, in
    dormitory called the Russian intelligentsia, has one, mainly her
    inherent feature: she perceives in principle and enthusiastically
    every idea, every fact, even rumor, aimed at discrediting
    state, as well as spiritual orthodox power, to everything else
    it is indifferent in the life of the country. "

    And here are the words of the military historian, General Staff, Major General E. I. Martynov, who was later killed by the Bolsheviks): "Try to ask our intellectuals questions: what is war, patriotism, army, military specialty, military valor? Ninety out of a hundred will answer you: war is crime, patriotism is a relic of antiquity, the army is the main brake on progress, the military profession is a shameful trade, military valor is a manifestation of stupidity and atrocity ... "
    Is it any wonder that in 1905, Russian intellectuals sent
    telegrams to the Japanese Mikado, congratulating him on the victory over Russia? "

  22. Nikolav
    Nikolav 14 May 2014 12: 25
    0
    Absolutely right! Nothing has changed since then.