New anti-tank missile system for the Russian army

68
The General Director of the Saratov Aggregate Plant, Igor Ivanov, at a meeting of the regional government, said that the company had begun to build a heavy anti-tank missile system. This complex will replace the Chrysanthemum-S complex in the future. The new development will be implemented on a unified tracked platform "Armata". This was reported by the agency ITAR-TASS.

New anti-tank missile system for the Russian army


"The company will spend 70 million of its own funds on two investment projects this year"- said the general director.
The second development of the plant is the creation of a lightweight mobile anti-aircraft missile system using rubber.
The tactical and technical characteristics of the new platform are still classified.

The unified heavy tracked platform (TGUP) of the Armata cipher (often referred to as “Armada” in the press) is a fourth-generation Russian tracked platform developed by the Uralvagonzavod with the 2009-2010 of the year.

TGUP "Armata" has a combat mass of up to 55 tons, with the active defense of the KAZ "Afghan". Equipped with A-85-3A diesel turbo-piston engine with HP 1500 power. Able to reach speed on the highway to 75 km / h.

Based on this Armata cipher platform, it is planned to create a main battle tank, an infantry fighting vehicle, a heavy armored personnel carrier, a support combat vehicle tanks, armored repair and recovery vehicle, chassis for self-propelled artillery installations and others.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    April 25 2014 20: 09
    We’re not marking the place! We are developing new systems! Well done! Hurry to see Armata, at least with one eye))
    1. +11
      April 25 2014 20: 12
      Quote: TurboSloN
      We’re not marking the place! We are developing new systems! Well done! Hurry to see Armata, at least with one eye))

      Yes, more likely. Look what kind of beast
      1. +19
        April 25 2014 20: 17
        A lot of interesting things in armature-armored capsule, uninhabited tower, engine location, and finally appearance! As they implement all this, I think there will be a bunch of innovative solutions. Zhdems.
        1. +1
          April 25 2014 20: 51
          If they also put a 2A82 cannon instead of a 2A46m, then it will be a beast.
      2. +1
        April 25 2014 20: 34
        Quote: punk
        Yes, more likely. Look what kind of beast

        tests to be carried out on the track of the international tank biathlon. just equip a friend or foe system
      3. -7
        April 25 2014 20: 35
        Quote: punk
        Yes, more likely. Look what kind of beast

        It’s only a pity - to live in this wonderful time / I don’t have to - neither to me nor to you

        From the poem "Railway" (1864) by Y. A. Nekrasov (1821 - 1877). Allegorically: regret that you do not have to see the embodiment of some great prospects (joker.-iron.).
        It would be nice for Nekrasov to make a mistake!
        1. +1
          April 25 2014 23: 12
          Quote: Bayonet
          It’s only a pity - to live in this wonderful time / I don’t have to - neither to me nor to you

          How much pessimism! Go ahead and with the song! We can do a lot more! The main thing is to believe in yourself!
          1. 0
            April 26 2014 08: 11
            God help you, dear comrade, but there are a lot of interesting songs for you!
        2. +1
          April 25 2014 23: 28
          Quote: Bayonet
          It’s only a pity - to live in this wonderful time / I don’t have to - neither to me nor to you


          Do you have health problems? Or did you see Nikolai the second alive? laughing
          1. 0
            April 26 2014 08: 08
            Quote: Semyon Semyonich
            Do you have health problems?

            Some people here have problems with humor! But seriously, there is too much talk about Armata, but there is really nothing. For example, the Mi-28 helicopter was created for 40 years (!) - the first project was in 1968. We designed, abandoned, changed, made “fateful decisions”, etc. etc. In 2007 - Rostvertol began to master production. If this happens with Armat ...
            From the number of minuses to me, the design of Almaty will not accelerate, unfortunately.
            1. 0
              April 26 2014 08: 50
              Quote: Bayonet
              From the number of minuses to me, the design of Almaty will not accelerate, unfortunately.


              I practically do not use this option.
    2. platitsyn70
      +4
      April 25 2014 20: 25
      the armor is strong and our tanks are fast.
    3. Orc-xnumx
      -6
      April 25 2014 22: 37
      But lagging behind the Yankees for now ...
      1. +3
        April 25 2014 22: 44
        And tell me - what year of development of the MBT "Abrams"? Then talk about the lag
      2. +2
        April 26 2014 03: 33
        Quote: Orc-78
        But lagging behind the Yankees for now ...

        the Yankees did not advance further t72 / t90 - their MBT of the same years of development.
    4. 0
      April 26 2014 07: 49
      We’ll see you at the Parade next year.
    5. 0
      April 28 2014 17: 29
      According to the good old tradition, they will again call it some beautiful flower, let's see which plant will complement the most beautiful bouquet of our troops.
  2. +8
    April 25 2014 20: 11
    Another good news. Keep it up.
  3. +2
    April 25 2014 20: 11
    The second development of the plant is the creation of a lightweight mobile anti-aircraft missile system using rubber.

    I wonder what level this means of air defense is. Easy - platoon or company?
    1. +8
      April 25 2014 20: 37
      Quote: APASUS
      I wonder what level this means of air defense is. Easy - platoon or company?

      Surely a battalion, since the battalion has always been considered the main tactical unit. And then, it will certainly be a wheeled vehicle escorting units on the battlefield. The battalion commander will finally receive a long arm from the enemy’s IOS. Now Apache with 8-10 km ATGM will no longer shoot! Helfayer to him in .pu!
  4. Smiles to you
    +11
    April 25 2014 20: 13
    There are no emotions left. It is necessary, "Somewhere", on "Someone", to experience ...
    1. Borisych
      +1
      April 25 2014 20: 26
      I guess where and on whom ...
      1. +3
        April 25 2014 20: 50
        Quote: Borisych
        I guess where and on whom ...

        Hardly ... With the adoption of a number of armored vehicles based on Armata, our "partners" should lose the desire to poke their heads under the cocked guillotine. Fools, like mad Mishiko, remain less and less in this through and through pragmatic world.
        Well, if the clowns are still there, then USer will no longer help them. They have not yet learned to sew the head back! IMHO.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      April 25 2014 20: 51
      Quote: Smiles to You
      There are no emotions left. It is necessary, "Somewhere", on "Someone", to experience ...


      On Bandera-Americans
    4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +3
    April 25 2014 20: 16
    All the modern demanded developments of modern weapons must certainly be introduced into production, otherwise we may find ourselves in the rearguard of the introduction of modern weapons in the army.
  6. +12
    April 25 2014 20: 16
    On the basis of this "Armata" cipher platform, it is planned to create a main battle tank, an infantry fighting vehicle, a heavy armored personnel carrier, a tank support combat vehicle, an armored recovery vehicle, a chassis for self-propelled artillery units and others.

    Unification is good, fewer different parts.
    1. nalim
      +3
      April 25 2014 21: 18
      Our equipment is valuable and so ... you don’t have to go far: AK-47 ... 74 ... and with amers their rifle crap all over the world
    2. 0
      April 25 2014 22: 05
      And as ONE REPAIR BASE AND SPECIALISTS.
    3. Orc-xnumx
      0
      April 25 2014 22: 44
      Unification has always been the cornerstone of the domestic defense industry!
  7. +3
    April 25 2014 20: 17
    apparently it will be light like Javelin. But the info about Armata pleases. It is interesting when it is already shown somewhere for the public?
    1. +4
      April 25 2014 20: 19
      If memory serves in 2015 will show.
    2. +1
      April 26 2014 03: 37
      Quote: Magic Archer
      apparently it will be light like Javelin. But the info about Armata pleases. It is interesting when it is already shown somewhere for the public?

      Rogozin enlisted 9 on May 2015 of the year at the 70 anniversary of the victory show.
  8. Gvozdovsky
    +3
    April 25 2014 20: 27
    And on the "rubber track" - how's that ?! laughing Will it bounce along the way? wassat Or will he have a rubber-motor drive?
    1. Smiles to you
      0
      April 25 2014 20: 45
      Well, what comes to mind!
      Rubberized rollers ...
      Lightweight (metal rubber), gusli ...
      1. +2
        April 25 2014 22: 01
        I think they mean the wheels!
    2. +2
      April 25 2014 21: 13
      On a wheeled chassis .. Like a Zubr.
    3. Orc-xnumx
      0
      April 25 2014 22: 46
      Thank God - not "hto ne skache, that ...")))
  9. kelevra
    +2
    April 25 2014 20: 31
    Well done, well done, no need to stand still!
  10. +2
    April 25 2014 20: 33
    Russia now again needs, as they say, - At TEMPA to build up its military potentialwhen they clang their teeth around, rattle their arms and pour down continuous threats against Russia, and blatantly lie, compose FABLES, constantly provoke.
    And of course, such messages are encouraging. Good luck to the developers!
    1. 0
      April 25 2014 20: 39
      In principle, the defense industry is building up and busy no matter what the news is from the defense industry, constant purchases, modernization.
  11. typhoon7
    +1
    April 25 2014 20: 35
    There has been a lot of good news from the military-industrial complex lately. We are looking forward to new combat vehicles. God is to help everyone involved.
  12. +4
    April 25 2014 20: 37
    We used to make an anti-tank missile system based on a heavy tank.

    1. 0
      April 25 2014 22: 17
      95% hit, discontinued due to the fact that VERY was dear. (especially rockets)
  13. +1
    April 25 2014 20: 38
    Madhouse grew stronger, definitely. Tank destroyers are armored and developed as the main tank. Well, it’s possible to chop so much coal for defense. Darkness. These means of life are not in contact with the battle with the tank. And they need dynamic protection ????? They need more ammunition. And most importantly in AZ. And here we have a tank, And a la minus armor protection at zero offer. Make a fool of us- ........ OH FOOT.
    1. Evgeniy.
      0
      April 25 2014 20: 46
      Yeah, but how to protect yourself from infantryman and / or terrorists with RPGs?
    2. +3
      April 25 2014 21: 00
      Quote: Signaller
      Madhouse grew stronger, definitely ...
      Have you seen the sample? Do you know the layout? So what the x ... are you starting to criticize? Maybe there will only be a chassis from Almaty!
    3. 0
      April 25 2014 22: 05
      So it was with the king of peas they tried what is better, because he is in Kubinka!
    4. +1
      April 25 2014 22: 20
      Quote: Signaller
      Madhouse grew stronger, definitely. Tank destroyers are armored and developed as the main tank.

      World War II "Ferdinand", "Jagdtiger" are pure anti-tank weapons, if you think about it, then 2Tiger and "CT" are also more anti-tank weapons than tanks.
      Modern "Abrams" and "Challenger", were also created to counter the tanks of the "Warsaw Pact", ie, as anti-tank equipment, although they are considered tanks
  14. 0
    April 25 2014 20: 39
    It remains to eat up a new ATGM will be the third generation.
  15. +1
    April 25 2014 20: 41
    At ChTZ, with a similar engine, they did a modular transmission, but I can’t find anything from it recently. An, found
    http://maxpark.com/community/404/content/2063739
    A family of X-shaped four-stroke water-cooled diesels under the title 2B began to be developed in the early 1970s. Engine power ranged from 300 hp (4 cylinders) up to 1600 hp (16 cylinders). The last 2V-16-2 engine in the version with reduced to 1200 hp power planned to install on a new tank T-80. The 2V-16-2 engine was included in a single monoblock - the MTU-2 engine-transmission unit, which consisted of a diesel engine, hydrodynamic transmission, electro-hydraulic control system, a cooling system and air filters. Monoblock occupied a volume of 3,6 cubic meters. During the maintainability test of the T-80, a team of four was able to replace the monoblock in 65 minutes.
  16. Leshka
    +1
    April 25 2014 20: 42
    all these words must be seen
  17. -1
    April 25 2014 20: 44
    SU 76 - PASSED ????? The analogue. like a gun fires. From 100 meters the TIGER WILL LIKE Well ..... And everything else - Like a mass grave. on all crew members. Do we need this ????
    You need to think. No more. And apparently these effective managers do not have a thought ....... And no one will ask us ....
    1. +2
      April 25 2014 21: 02
      Quote: Signaller
      .A no one will ask us ....
      Sorry for the stupid question. What is your last name? Are you a secret developer of armored vehicles, what would you ask?
    2. +1
      April 25 2014 22: 10
      Quote: Signaller
      SU 76 - PASSED ?????

      The real SU-76, created on the basis of the light T-70, by installing the ZiS-3 gun in the open wheelhouse, was intended, like the ZiS-3, to directly support the infantry and engage in battle with enemy tanks, entered, like the ZiS-3, from a very "good" life. It has never been in service with anti-tank defense units, unlike WoT, where, apart from tanks, there is no one to "fight" laughing
      Here we are talking about anti tank complex.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. +1
    April 25 2014 20: 49
    Yes, by the way, CENTAUR is already available. Why not apply. ??? Sea of ​​fire. and everything else. Ikarus was cut to zero. - I watched the video, so what's the catch ??? type PAPA does not order. Or is the gut thin ?????
    1. +2
      April 25 2014 21: 06
      Quote: Signaller
      Yes, by the way, CENTAUR is already available ...
      And what does the "Centaur" have to do with it? Firstly wheeled, secondly Italian, thirdly it does not unify with our equipment in any way!
  20. +6
    April 25 2014 20: 50
    A tank based on "Armata" how will the T-90 fly? )))
    1. 0
      April 25 2014 20: 54
      It will fly no worse than the PAK T-50))
    2. 0
      April 26 2014 03: 41
      Quote: Solidgrasp
      A tank based on "Armata" how will the T-90 fly? )))

      Why should a tank fly? These tricks are good only for demonstration performances, and so is pure indulgence. By the way, the German "Leopard" with a weight of under 60 tons also "flies".
  21. Palych9999
    0
    April 25 2014 20: 52
    Again, an assortment of different equipment is being inflated.
    1. +2
      April 25 2014 21: 06
      In the USSR, several design bureaus could work on one type of military equipment, and it was as a result of competition that masterpieces were born.
    2. +2
      April 25 2014 21: 08
      Quote: Palych9999
      Again, an assortment of different equipment is being inflated.
      Yes, yes, the bayonet is a knife in one hand, PM in the other and enough, nefig to fence!
  22. 0
    April 25 2014 20: 53
    do and test-the troops need a new generation of weapons
  23. 0
    April 25 2014 20: 57
    Okay friends, don’t be discouraged that you saw what will be seen. We will live and see Armada in action, what are our years.
  24. Andreitch
    +2
    April 25 2014 21: 01
    Declared TTX pleasing! good
    More tanks! Good and fast!
    And meeting the environmental standards of EURO-5! laughing
    1. +3
      April 25 2014 21: 16
      If Koshkin had designed the T-34s like they were "Bradley" ... I'd better not say anything.
      http://youtu.be/qOtioVb2RLA
  25. +1
    April 25 2014 21: 09
    on the rubber run.


    STA?

    Is it in the sense of wheels, tires? Or rubber tracks? Or is it slang like that?
  26. ALEK7SANDR
    0
    April 25 2014 21: 25
    hold on non-sacrifice tanks
    1. +2
      April 25 2014 21: 32
      what to hold on to? How to insert a video from YouTube?
      1. +2
        April 25 2014 21: 37
        Quote: sabakina
        How to insert a video from YouTube?



        Copy the link, in the paste video window, delete http, paste the copy.
  27. storm wind
    0
    April 25 2014 21: 39
    Straight balm to the soul! I've been waiting for something new in this area for a long time .. But "Chrysanthemum" is certainly good and will still serve ..
  28. 0
    April 25 2014 21: 50
    I can’t wait to see this monster, I’m sure our designers didn’t jump, something tells me that it will be so!
  29. 0
    April 25 2014 21: 52
    We need guns recourse more ....
  30. 0
    April 25 2014 22: 01
    Our defense industry is not standing still. And developments are underway. Hurry to see them and run in a series. good drinks
  31. 0
    April 25 2014 22: 53
    Bl, people, have you carefully read the news? Saratov aggregate. plant what place to develop new anti-tank systems? Chrysanthemum was designed by Kolomenkoye KBM. Most likely it will be the same Chrysanthemum, but on a new chassis! And why is this needed? Such complexes must be ambushed and dumped, here maneuverability is more important.
  32. +1
    April 25 2014 23: 28
    New anti-tank missile system for the Russian army

    Pisi: The best anti-tank complex of all time - 28 Panfilovites and behind Moscow ... wink
  33. +4
    April 26 2014 01: 00
    M-d-ah, "delight-full pants"! The main thesis of the note is ATGM plus some air defense systems, and "delight", basically, "revolves" around the UBP "Armata", the main purpose of which is MBT (BMP, armored personnel carriers, self-propelled guns are options for the main idea). About "Armata"! Real production will begin, we will be glad again. And then what "joys", except for the message: "We will have ethno in a while!" ? How much "joy" was there at the time about "Hermes"? Hey, where is he? Not any performance characteristics (although here one "clairvoyant" has already "assigned" a certain range to the new air defense missile system). It is not clear why this ATGM-S should be based on an expensive tank platform? ATGM-S is a relatively cheap means of reducing the enemy's MBT population, and here: plus ATGM, minus tank "Armata". The most "popular" use of ATGM-S is due to ambushes, and in this case, the developers propose to use it as a "assault rifle" when breaking through a deeply echelon, heavily fortified enemy defense? Is it better to give the Armata tank guided long-range projectiles, as the Americans are going to do? What has become of the Chrysanthemum, which has not been tested in combat? Are the missiles obsolete? Why not try to "make" new ones like the promised "Hermes"? New air defense system? Is there a "necessary necessity" if the long-voiced "Morpheus" is still in the "Andromeda nebula"? Oh, yes, the "Morpheus" has its own purpose, the "new air defense system" has its own. So this is nothing! There are "crazy hands", without having time to test one "Armor", they are already offering another, "designed" to replace both "TOP" and "Buk-M2 / M3". So let them "improve" the unfinished "Morpheus". In general, let's rejoice in fact!
  34. 0
    April 26 2014 03: 01
    lightweight mobile anti-aircraft missile system on a rubber track.
    Maybe my eyes are bad ??? What is this "rubber" move ??? Well, I understand tracked, wheeled there, clarify the experts ... request
    Of the entire article, more or less useful information only about
    70 million enterprise funds
    who will go somewhere there. What does the "Armata" have to do with it, in the name about the ATGM, and if there is no ATGM itself, where do we need the platform ...
  35. +1
    April 26 2014 11: 50
    Armata is fed for the last year, and then there’s a miracle ....

    It would be better if they brought this to mind, it turned out faster.

    1. +1
      April 26 2014 18: 18
      By the sound, a turbo-jet plane rolls along the strip, and not a tank rides through the mud ..
  36. +2
    April 26 2014 12: 39
    To draw a line under the news, our director didn’t say that. Zhurnalyugi already tired of his lies. News duck clean water. like this :(.