Military Review

Vulgarity. Infantilization of culture. Alienation...

61
Vulgarity. Infantilization of culture. Alienation...



(article by Vicente Verdú, Spanish writer and journalist)

Television rhetoric about masturbation, feces, ejaculation, endless programs with strokes, weighting of busts, endless rumors about celebrities, stories about voluptuous members of parliament, linguistic excrement scattered around various interviews, putting bodies on public display. Virtually all aspects of life, formerly hiding because of shyness, religious beliefs, or the education we received, are now at the very center of public attention. Obscene expressions? Humming places? Monthly? Appearance in what mother gave birth? What other excuse is needed by one individual or a whole group of people to publicly remove his panties and expose his ass?

In theaters today they give a whole dozen of performances, like Vagina Monologues, which revolves around human reproductive organs: any intimate details of human life are dragged to the surface in order to cheer up the audience, floundering at the same time in the most that viscous vulgarity. And a similar trend in the entertainment industry can be observed around the world.

The most characteristic and noticeable epidemic of the beginning of the 21st century is not atypical pneumonia, but shamelessness, vulgarity, primitiveness. The entire globe, braided by constantly repetitive video images, has almost become similar to the metaphor-buff of the sexual organ, which is just about ready to erupt by semen or fetid with natural needs, accompanied by coarse gaggle.

What happens here, there, everywhere? Rudeness has already become the norm?

Crowded with vulgarity transfer manage to collect a multimillion audience of viewers, who turns back from the "nastiness" offered to them. However, despite this, they are not able to even look away from the picture on the TV. Moreover, among the most progressive and cult characters of our society there are those who regularly watch similar programs in order to “relax”. This implies that they look at them for information about the degradation of society.

At one time, kitsch with its inherent secondary look ironic parody. The thrash culture that appeared later deceived the viewer with its supposed perversity. In a systematic vulgarity, turned into a real tautology, there is nothing but the excess flesh, slop and flat jokes. Or so: pictures from some reality shows are pure fat, a buffet of bad taste, eating food from which you do not even have the opportunity to digest it into some kind of sinful pleasure. A picture is all that goes into food, and eating ends after the end of the program.

Culture for children

Interest in the dead, the attractiveness of various crap, uncontrollable behavior, lack of understanding of the distinction between personal and public - in one word “culture of assholes” - all this belongs to the world of children. German scientist Norbert Elias, in collaboration with other researchers, published a book about the evolution of sports, in which he analyzed the behavior of adult fans at sports competitions, comparing their exclamations and gestures with children's manner of expressing their own emotions, which kids use in any public place.

Each football fan will express his emotions at the stadium like a child, thanks to the atmosphere of permissiveness prevailing at a sporting event. However, an adult person will never behave this way under other circumstances. The venue of a football match and its time act for the fan as an outlet through which all those primitive urges that civilization suppressed in man, so that he can more orderly exist in society together with other individuals, spill out. Likewise, any person was forced to leave for his private life most of the emotions associated with pleasure or pain: so the love moans were transferred to the alcove, and the administration of the body's physiological needs - to the latrines.

Today, it is really not customary to defecate in the presence of others, there are no paid mourners at a funeral, and most people are not inclined to promiscuity. People prefer to adhere to common standards of behavior in order to leave intact the common habitat zone. But all these rules after the triumph of vulgarity, apparently, are gradually beginning to die off. Otherwise, how can one explain the fact that someone in a heart-rending voice screams into a mobile phone in any public place and calls it a personal conversation? How can you justify all those antics that were publicly drunk?

All our upbringing was aimed at curbing our emotions, and the better a person was able to control the expression of his feelings, the more respect he enjoyed. And, what, today this norm of behavior is lost? It seems that the epidemic of vulgarity, recently named The Wall Street Journal, was no longer just a temporary symptom.

It is possible that this trend is associated with the general infantilization of culture and society as a whole, and its main feature is the desire to do what you want - immediately and without restraining yourself. In other words, behave like a child who knows nothing about prudence or restraint, who feels himself the master of the world and who is completely unable to understand that, in the name of some incomprehensible rules for him, he must wait to receive the desired (sweets, eating, drinking, or serving physiological needs).

In society, vulgarity manifests itself not only in behavior and in violation of its norms, but also in careless handling of colloquial speech, in hearing cuts, and misuse of established speech patterns, which can be heard in almost any television or radio program. Moreover, such a speech is beginning to be perceived as "real", "sincere", which can be used live on television and in the movie "about life." Harsh words are heard so often that they are beginning to lose their expressiveness, become pale and, like garbage, just clog up our speech, making it all the more vulgar. Today there is a situation where most people, before they say something, either think briefly or do not think at all; the norm of today's communication is the language of conversations on a mobile phone, its inconsistency and steepness resembling spasms.

A small child is not able to wait for what he wants, he is ready to stomp his feet and sob in his voice to immediately get what he wants. Similarly, the most vulgar adult person is unable to perceive literary works - unhurried in their descriptions and not inclined to produce an effect. Such a person will prefer to the written spectacular images, around which the whole culture unfolds immediately get what you want.

Vulgarity can be perceived as an evil of society, but at the same time, vulgarity is the shortest and direct way to the essence of the issue. The faster an individual gets to the heart of the matter - the better, and at the same time, the shorter the path is - the more primitive it is. In addition, the shortest path is usually the most clumsy, as evidenced by the American military campaigns. The pragmatism of the short cut is generally a very American trait, which, as such, becomes an integral part of pop culture. And it is not surprising that today this culture has spread throughout the world.

Bad manners

Today, even the Americans themselves are surprised by the widespread vulgarity. At a recent meeting in Toronto of members of the American Psychiatric Society, Lilia Cortina, a psychologist at the University of Michigan, said: "We are amazed at the extent of bad behavior among the population, and most of all by the influence of bad manners on people." This, in the first place, was about primitivism and rudeness in the treatment of individuals with each other. Thus, it turns out that vulgarity is something more than a sporadic distortion of reality and not at all verbal games with the use of the words "ejaculation, saliva and butt." Having reached a certain limit, vulgarity becomes a lifestyle. This is the style of a degrading democratic society, in which the fetid wounds of ruined human relations are revealed, the intimate side of a person’s life is put up for sale, and rendering assistance turns into unnecessary ballast, which they assume only for the sake of professional gain.

Among other reasons for the onset of the kingdom of vulgarity, Harvard University professor Robert Putnam refers to the growing social isolation of people in society. In 1999, Putnam published the book "Bowling alone," in which he says that a person feels less and less satisfied, the reason for which was the almost complete disappearance of interpersonal relationships in society. The lack of contact between people and divided experiences led to the emergence of depressive states, despair, increased aggressiveness and falling into depression. And at the same time there was an increase in the distrust of one person to another.

In the absence of normal human relations, a person living nearby ceases to be a good neighbor for another, who is turned to in search of good company or help, and becomes a kind of threat. The picture of disappearance of sympathy and respect for another person can be complemented by recalling the inexplicably aggressive behavior of drivers, the coldness and rudeness of sellers in many developed countries, the increasing complaints about service workers, the sad disappearance of good relations between neighbors, families, friends. Disappears not only respect for another, but also for oneself.

This situation gave rise to nervousness and nonsense in relations between people, the primitiveness of the language of communication. In other words, the current state of things is a true apogee of rudeness. Everyone is trying to defend himself without analyzing either the means used or the one against whom they are used. At the same time, film and television show us that the more obscene rudeness, the more obvious the vulgarity - the greater the audience.

So what, bad taste is the taste of modern man? A person living in today's society - the pressure of unemployment, chronic lies, fake wars, public release of gases - does not know what to stick, and vulgarity becomes an indicator of its organic decomposition. Predilection for foul-smelling or ill-flavored food — for example, some cheeses or beverages — requires the ability to perceive the hidden flavor of a product, which usually turns out to be more refined and sophisticated than the first impression of it. Today, however, vulgarity is becoming a sign of moral confusion, garbage aesthetics, and fetid disintegration of democratic principles.
Author:
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Humpty
    Humpty April 24 2014 06: 11
    +7
    The precepts of Dulles and the "wise men of Zion" in action. To heal corruption with a hammer and sickle.
    1. Reasonable, 2,3
      Reasonable, 2,3 April 24 2014 06: 25
      .
      And in my opinion a person is not friends with the head. I'm talking about the author. One vagina in the brain.
      1. Humpty
        Humpty April 24 2014 06: 42
        +13
        Quote: Reasonable, 2,3
        And in my opinion a person is not friends with the head. I'm talking about the author. One vagina in the brain.


        If the author of the article is not satisfied with the total propaganda
        debauchery, this does not mean that the problem is in his head. Elderly people in Europe often compare today's west with late Rome.
        1. Reasonable, 2,3
          Reasonable, 2,3 April 24 2014 06: 54
          .
          What am I doing here? This is my opinion. And I hate the intelligentsia.
          1. dmb
            dmb April 24 2014 08: 32
            +2
            "Wow, crackpots, damned liberals! Damn seed!" - N. Gogol "The Inspector General".
          2. sso-xnumx
            sso-xnumx April 24 2014 12: 11
            0
            Doctors and engineers too?
        2. Reasonable, 2,3
          Reasonable, 2,3 April 24 2014 07: 08
          -5
          Who read the crap, that does not jump. With sarcasm to the article.
        3. CALL.
          CALL. April 24 2014 12: 59
          +1
          the ubiquity of vulgarity.


      2. sv68
        sv68 April 24 2014 07: 40
        +3
        one of the few adequate people in the West who not only understands that their culture is essentially a degradation of both society and the individual as a whole, but writes honestly about it, and actually warns this article not to repeat the Western pseudo-intellectual path.
        1. jktu66
          jktu66 April 24 2014 10: 37
          0
          They really perd, then still laugh. Fun, damn it. About themselves, their opinion, believe clover gais, they say about Russians, step-by-step. Of course, not all of them, there are also very worthy people.
  2. mig31
    mig31 April 24 2014 06: 13
    +7
    The degeneration of the West as an epilogue of its "culture" is not even rudeness, but mass degradation, remember the decline of ancient Rome ...
    1. Humpty
      Humpty April 24 2014 06: 20
      +5
      What the doctor ordered.
  3. Al_lexx
    Al_lexx April 24 2014 06: 17
    +28
    Very correct and useful article.
    Only the essence of what is happening is not the propaganda of rudeness and vulgarity, but the deliberate and systematic destruction of the main unit of society and the foundations of traditional values, namely, the family. For globalists, family destruction, loss of self-identification, etc. there is the main task, which would ultimately get for its use a working, consuming and completely brainless, incapable biomass.
    1. igor_m_p
      igor_m_p April 24 2014 06: 46
      +12
      In my opinion, the main root of evil lies in a nutshell - liberalism and tolerance. Brought to the point of absurdity.
      Liberalism implies personal rights and freedoms as the highest value. If we bring this concept to the point of absurdity, then we get - I do what I want, no matter what.
      With tolerance, it’s about the same thing - no matter what form the people around you do - spit and hammer, at least until the people around you spit and hammer on your behavior.
      In such conditions, any moral and cultural framework - this is a direct attempt on liberal values, and as a result - violates the principle of tolerance.

      And more and more often I remember the biblical Sodom and Gomorrah ... They like Christians in the West, I don’t confuse anything ???
      1. Per se.
        Per se. April 24 2014 07: 12
        +3
        Quote: igor_m_p
        In my opinion, the main root of evil lies in a nutshell - liberalism and tolerance. Brought to the point of absurdity.
        Rather, in consumerism, in the cult of consumerism, as the goal and meaning of all life. Everything else follows from this "psychology of the virus" with the primacy of "bread and circuses", with a new effect of Sadom and Gomora. The fact that Christians ... The Vatican itself has long been mired in sins, the faith has been organized into religion as a kind of business. If our current Prime Minister Medvedev spoke about growing consumers in our country, it means that the "virus" has also spread to Russia. Rumble from pop parties of show business is a bright indicator of the process. Nevertheless, it is Russia that can (and should) become the spiritual core of the world, opposing the culture of the Russian world, true tolerance, and natural justice to Eastern dogmatists-radicals and Western degenerate pederasts.
      2. Al_lexx
        Al_lexx April 24 2014 07: 51
        +3
        Quote: igor_m_p
        In my opinion, the main root of evil lies in a nutshell - liberalism and tolerance. Brought to the point of absurdity.
        <...>

        This is not the root of evil. These are evil tools. Ecumenism belongs to the same tools. Evil uses the incitement of ethnic hatred with exactly the same constancy as liberal-tolerant leverage.

        The root of evil lies in the irrepressible pursuit of world domination by a limited handful of people who, in fact, have lost their human appearance. I’m not even sure that they can even be called people. For me, this is some kind of parallel civilization, with an extremely limited population. Maybe even conditionally reasonable. Money, as such, they no longer need. They themselves are already money and the amount of capital they have is virtually unlimited. They need total power, nothing more.

        I am by nature not an anti-Semite (a bunch of Jewish friends), but a clear anti-Zionist. Why am I? To the fact that I want to quote Henry Ford:
        "If 50 of the richest Jewish families on earth are destroyed, then wars can be forgotten for a long time."
        Maybe not quite verbatim and maybe it’s not only and not so much the Zionists, but that’s the essence.
        1. igor_m_p
          igor_m_p April 24 2014 08: 44
          +1
          By the way, I came across an interesting statement somewhere, unfortunately there was no way to check how true it was. It said that all US presidents in the history of this state are, to one degree or another, fairly close relatives, that is, in fact, the states were always ruled by one family. Well, with Obama it’s understandable, a little not at the box office, but I came across this statement even before he was chosen.
          I wonder how true is it?
        2. washi
          washi April 24 2014 11: 06
          0
          Quote: Al_lexx
          I am by nature not an anti-Semite (a bunch of Jewish friends), but a clear anti-Zionist.

          Zionists are those who want to live in their "homeland" in Israel. So the Zionists are already there.
          But what do you call the rest?
          Quote: Al_lexx
          "If 50 of the richest Jewish families on earth are destroyed, then wars can be forgotten for a long time."
    2. Igor39
      Igor39 April 24 2014 07: 19
      +4
      Al_lexx
      I completely agree with you, it was under the USSR that educated and highly moral people were needed, Karl Marx's Capital was studied at school and knew what the surplus value and exploitation of man by man is. Now they are trying to teach us in schools, but why do capitalists need smart and educated people in Companies are run by relatives or children of officials, workers and peasants have no opportunity to educate their children in universities, so now there is continuity. And the destruction of the family institution is also beneficial to capitalists who dream of the "Golden Billion".
      1. Al_lexx
        Al_lexx April 24 2014 08: 05
        +4
        Igor hi
        In Soviet times, there was almost a fashion for education. We really were the most reading nation in the world. And given the fact that there was distinct censorship, we usually read something good and high-quality, at least useful. Under the USSR, almost everyone who had the talent and desire to study had the opportunity to break into people. The only exception was the party ladder, especially since the time of Khrushchev. Education in the USSR was fundamental, in contrast to the applied Western. Those. they gave us exactly the foundation for further development in many areas, and they trained specialists in specific fields.

        The family was holy in the USSR. As the same Zhvanetsky joked - in our country there was no sex (to talk about morality). It is a strong family that allows you to raise a normal patriot and ensure a positive demography. Now this remains (well, almost) only among Asians, who, one after another, are mountainous and breed like ... But most importantly, the destruction of a family destroys self-identification and, as a result, an indifferent attitude to the state as such. It is from here that people come who are looking for where better, and do not equip their home (they simply do not have one).
  4. Agat
    Agat April 24 2014 06: 20
    +6
    Now people always have a choice. Read a book. Go to a show. A person can also choose words himself! It may be easy for an adult to do this, but not for a child. Therefore, we must now educate children correctly in the family. So that children read the right books, listen to good music. So that we pass on the best to our children, and the next generation will be better than us!
    1. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx April 24 2014 08: 11
      +1
      Quote: Agat
      Now people always have a choice. Read a book. Go to a show. A person can also choose words himself! It may be easy for an adult to do this, but not for a child. Therefore, we must now educate children correctly in the family. So that children read the right books, listen to good music. So that we pass on the best to our children, and the next generation will be better than us!

      Everything is correct. There is only one important point. Going down is always easier than going up. So that a person does not roll along an inclined road, sometimes he has to be forced to pull up. Not everyone likes this, but treatment is not always painless.
    2. washi
      washi April 24 2014 11: 12
      0
      Quote: Agat
      Now people always have a choice

      And there are still friends, acquaintances, etc., who can "advise", there is a fashion (as for the same Solzhenitsyn in his time).
      It is good if a person has an established upbringing. And if young and stupid? And if there is a long-term processing of the population as in the USSR, during perestroika, as on the outskirts? Many are able to resist?
  5. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich April 24 2014 06: 20
    +15
    Vicente Verdu! my respect for the article ... to give it to our Duma to read, and even better to distribute it to all media, and a copy to the President’s table! television zombies and promotes everything except honor, dignity, decency ... this is in our country a clearly enemy propaganda organ. even on Channel One, this is sometimes broadcast, which scares young people ... hi
    1. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx April 24 2014 08: 14
      +1
      In the Duma, it is necessary to disseminate and force to write essays on the subject, the teachings of Jeddah Krishnamurti. Then people will begin to have a healthy sense of shame for what they have done and not only. There will be very many positive effects, up to fantastic performance and the complete absence of aggression towards others.
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%F0%E8%F8%ED%E0%EC%F3%F0%F2%E8,_%C4%E6%E8%E4%E4%
      F3
  6. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz April 24 2014 06: 21
    +8
    Rough article. But not in the eyebrow, but in the eye. Everything is correct.
    1. olegkrava
      olegkrava April 24 2014 08: 01
      0
      IN THE EYE DOESN'T RECEIVE; HE IS BEATED OUT AND SECOND ALSO. THERE IS IF ON THE TOWER AND THE VACIOUS DUBIN, AND AFTER THIS, LET DEVELOP IN A NEW.
  7. psyholirik
    psyholirik April 24 2014 06: 36
    +5
    Moral and moral decay is worse than atomic warfare
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 24 2014 10: 00
      +3
      Quote: psyholirik
      Moral and moral decay is worse than atomic warfare
      and this is the war worse than nuclear ... hi
  8. lozh76
    lozh76 April 24 2014 06: 37
    +7
    It is interesting that the article came out on military review, in fact, it is time to take radical measures.
    1. sso-xnumx
      sso-xnumx April 24 2014 12: 30
      0
      It’s high time, they were growing vegetables (and this one, with its education reform, to send gold to Kolyma to wash, it will be more useful), and now they want people to become educated and patriotic overnight.
      PS Yes, and still would Isaudovich pseudo-genius throw out of the school curriculum to a ..... hair dryer!
  9. Turkir
    Turkir April 24 2014 06: 43
    +6
    Crude truth, not rude article.
    The aesthetics of impudent imperialism reflects the permissiveness of power and politics regarding its own population. Moral corruption, permissiveness, makes people a pliable tool in the hands of political elites. Why, because an unprincipled, spiritless person is an obedient robot.
    The penetration of such "shit.ma aesthetics" into our country is already noticeable.
  10. ya.seliwerstov2013
    ya.seliwerstov2013 April 24 2014 06: 49
    +5
    We are patriots of Russia,
    Here, our Motherland,
    In it, our pride and strength,
    Our great army ...
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 24 2014 10: 01
      +1
      Quote: ya.seliwerstov2013
      We are patriots of Russia,
      Here, our Motherland,
      In it, our pride and strength,
      Our great army ...

      nothing to add! + hi
  11. Tanechka-clever
    Tanechka-clever April 24 2014 06: 50
    +3
    "Today even Americans themselves are surprised at the ubiquity of vulgarity."

    In general, it is strange to hear this in the West, and even more so about the United States. After all, vulgarity has always been part of the "culture of free speech" in the West and in the United States. And the lack of such freedom in the USSR was very criticized, and Stalin was considered a dictator for this and accused of totalitarianism. And our Soviet dissidents were desperately trying to convey this same freedom to the Soviet people, which continues to do, for example, Lyudka Alekseeva, Soviet dissident and human rights activist of gay morality in Russia today. ... Gay morality and gay dictatorship are actively imposed in the world today in the form of democratic freedoms as a norm and as a democratic heritage of the modern community through all available information channels. And prestigious awards and nominations for "Oscars", as well as other prestigious awards, cast doubt on the sincerity of such statements as the author makes. Vulgarity in society cannot exist by itself - it is the result of a moral choice.
  12. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz April 24 2014 06: 52
    +1
    Crude truth, not rude article. ================= I agree with the remark. =========== Aesthetics of brazen imperialism, reflects the permissiveness of power and politics ========= ======== But I don’t have to educate me. It was late. I educated at the time, and not only conscripts. And among our brother-officer. I got stupid. And you do not make a chance? And the syllable of quotes reminds.
  13. Alex66
    Alex66 April 24 2014 06: 57
    +7
    Remember the movie "The Man from Boulevard des Capuchins". In the USSR, there was no art propagandizing debauchery - people were healthy in spirit. In Russia, you can show everything at any time of the day or night - that's why problems with the soul appeared.
    Need censorship, I think no one will be upset if the advertising of tampaks disappears, the transfer of house2 does not begin, the debilitating series disappear. It is necessary to promote bright relations between people.
    1. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx April 24 2014 08: 20
      +1
      +100500
      Good should not be toothless and with tied hands.
    2. washi
      washi April 24 2014 11: 21
      0
      Quote: Alex66
      Need censorship

      Not necessarily.
      As the Minister of Culture said, what is financed by the state should defend state interests (not literally). The rest of the media themselves will go so far as to support the country in which you live (or they will die). "Rain" in confirmation. They are already moaning.
  14. fly fishing
    fly fishing April 24 2014 07: 00
    +3
    I have a complete aversion to House-2, the Comedy Club and similar programs. But here's how to get another person to not watch this abomination when I hear on the street how a guy and a girl are discussing another program. Children, too, cannot be prohibited, TV, the Internet and friends. They look at their peers and try to be like.
    The article is correct, the problems are global, but not everything is so bad.
    1. jktu66
      jktu66 April 24 2014 10: 44
      0
      I have a complete aversion to House-2
      House-2 has caused our country more damage than all sanctions against Russia
      1. washi
        washi April 24 2014 11: 24
        0
        Quote: jktu66
        I have a complete aversion to House-2
        House-2 has caused our country more damage than all sanctions against Russia

        And for me "Dom-2" is a sample of how not to act. (you will be the same - you will grow up the same moron).
        If someone admires them, it means one thing: PARENTS DO NOT EXPLAIN. PARENTS DO NOT TAKE CARE OF THEIR CHILDREN.
  15. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz April 24 2014 07: 10
    +1
    Robots! You shaw? Sometimes watch this mutoten? My advice to you. I am not a psychologist. Spit on the telly. Let yours look. Take an example from me! soldier I watch only cartoons on TV. The rest of the time is here! And the nerves are in order, and the family is in order. The only war is who is behind the computer! Fortunately, I have two of them, plus a tablet!
    1. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx April 24 2014 08: 22
      +1
      Quote: dmitrij.blyuz
      Robots! You shaw? Sometimes watch this mutoten? My advice to you. I am not a psychologist. Spit on the telly. Let yours look. Take an example from me! soldier I watch only cartoons on TV. The rest of the time is here! And the nerves are in order, and the family is in order. The only war is who is behind the computer! Fortunately, I have two of them, plus a tablet!

      Dmitry. hi
      I will not litter the telly. Those. quite and already more than 10 years. I don’t even have a television cable. But I can’t say that this article is not in any way related to those who write on this resource.
      It’s just that the problem that the author writes about, it penetrated into all corners of our life, including and in live communication, without any media or whatever. Vulgarity is not only obvious rudeness. Poor folly, limitedness, lack of a mature opinion, and just poor knowledge of the native language are also vulgar.
  16. sledge
    sledge April 24 2014 07: 12
    +1
    First liberalization, and then vulgarization.
    1. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx April 24 2014 08: 25
      +3
      Quote: Sanya
      First liberalization, and then vulgarization.

      First, debilitation.
      1. jktu66
        jktu66 April 24 2014 10: 45
        0
        First liberalization, and then vulgarization.
        First, debilitation.
        Dumb is easier to manage
  17. Fish supervision
    Fish supervision April 24 2014 07: 17
    +1
    Reasonable, but I can’t hate the intelligentsia, because I haven’t met this individual in fact in my life
  18. KOH
    KOH April 24 2014 07: 17
    0
    I always said that let's say the first one, they fucked up, they jump and dance, apparently not mo.s.s.ali ...
    1. nahalenok911
      nahalenok911 April 24 2014 08: 15
      +1
      The word "Za.rali" is also vulgar!
  19. tvn
    tvn April 24 2014 07: 17
    +1
    Nothing personal just business.
    weakening of self-control-> consumerism-> corporate profits
  20. Turk
    Turk April 24 2014 07: 43
    +2
    In theaters today, they give a whole dozen performances, like "Monologues of the Vagina", the action of which unfolds around the human reproductive organs: any intimate details of human life are pulled to the surface to unrestrainedly amuse the audience, floundering at the same time in the most viscous vulgarity. And a similar trend in the entertainment industry can be observed all over the world .-------- And this is not about the Verkhovna Rada?
  21. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S April 24 2014 07: 45
    +1
    Quote: dmitrij.blyuz
    Robots! You shaw? Sometimes watch this mutoten? My advice to you. I am not a psychologist. Spit on the telly. Let yours look. Take an example from me! soldier I watch only cartoons on TV. The rest of the time is here! And the nerves are in order, and the family is in order. The only war is who is behind the computer! Fortunately, I have two of them, plus a tablet!


    Smart people who have a head on their shoulders have been spitting on TV for a long time, they are spat on the whole screen, it’s time to introduce tough censorship on television. Children and youth watch all these perversions, if Russia took the first step to revival, the next thing to do proper education of our future, our children.
  22. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz April 24 2014 07: 52
    +1
    But I agree with you! Censorship is needed. A long time ago. Something dragging on with this. But in vain.
    1. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx April 24 2014 08: 29
      0
      Quote: dmitrij.blyuz
      But I agree with you! Censorship is needed. A long time ago. Something dragging on with this. But in vain.

      With the West flirting in pseudo-democracy. However, at our top, the plans are not much different from foreign partners. The only difference is the lack of global police ambitions. I still do not see real support for the Russian ethnic group. They only remember us when it is necessary to annex Crimea or to organize a combat-ready army.
  23. lexx2038
    lexx2038 April 24 2014 07: 59
    0
    Quote: Sanya
    First liberalization, and then vulgarization.


    Yeah, and then vulvarization
  24. koshh
    koshh April 24 2014 08: 01
    +2
    The article appeared correctly on the "military review". After all, the events in Ukraine have become a watershed between the so-called "Western values" and the conservatism of the Slavic world, exacerbated the confrontation between Western and Eastern cultures. The task of the Western pseudo-culture is to fool its youth, instilling in them tolerance for what the Orthodox Church, the very nature of man, does not accept. See what programs our TV channels have filled. all sorts of "Home", "You won't believe it!" etc., which zombie the viewer into rejection of everything that has always been sacred to a person - family, homeland, faith. This is a real 5th column, which is waging a daily war for the minds of our children, for the destruction of our future with you, for the destruction of Russia as the leader of the Slavic world. And Ukraine is another round of the war of "good and evil", the war of "light and dark."
  25. rereture
    rereture April 24 2014 08: 44
    +1
    Or maybe just so as not to observe this vulgarity, just not watch the telly and bring up children normally?
    Don't like tnt, so what's the problem? Delete channel on TV?
    Don't like the spectrum? don't go like that.
    Do you have a vulgar environment? So stop talking to him.



    1. Stavros
      Stavros April 24 2014 08: 57
      +1
      Dear, you may not watch, this is your right. But if you have children, then I think you should be not indifferent to what they are watching.
      1. rereture
        rereture April 24 2014 09: 44
        +1
        I don’t have my own, but there is a younger sister who I follow, since there’s the Internet now and you can read and make every movie or cartoon to watch or not watch.

        But in fact, to shift the upbringing of children to the state, school and telly is the height of irresponsibility.
    2. Lenochka
      Lenochka April 24 2014 10: 28
      0
      Anyone who does not watch television and other sources of vulgar culture, all the same interact in society with people prone to vulgarization. And no matter how much one wants to minimize communication with such a degrading society, this is not always possible.
      1. rereture
        rereture April 24 2014 10: 42
        0
        According to you, we have completely degenerates subject to "vulgarization". You cannot treat compatriots like that.

        And the problem is far-fetched, of course, children need to be fenced, but an adult solves it himself.
  26. Stavros
    Stavros April 24 2014 08: 54
    0
    They say that it is necessary to develop sports, and not just one sports broadcast on the channels.
    Children's cartoons, already far from children's ones, are just horrible. Various shows, on which the main faces of fagots. Need censorship, and preferably tough.
  27. Morgan
    Morgan April 24 2014 08: 56
    +2
    The roots of modern "culture" in psychological wars. Moral animals are easy to manipulate, turning to instincts, the strongest of which (and acting constantly) is sexual. The output should be a world ruled by a MEMBER.
    Well, if you don’t stop ...
    1. Lenochka
      Lenochka April 24 2014 10: 59
      0
      It is very sad when such people meet at work. They do not understand that they go beyond the bounds of decency.
  28. Indifferent
    Indifferent April 24 2014 08: 58
    +1
    Curiously, at the origins of all this abomination is the "chosen" nation! Look at the figures of culture and art? Writers, directors, screenwriters and others ... Even if they have a Russian or Ukrainian surname, you can't hide your nose and eyes! I am not an anti-Semite. We are all humans. But why the Semites are all in art and decompose all progressive humanity, I cannot understand. Why do they all go to theaters and television with such persistence? There are less than 0.01% of them in the country, and almost 100% on television.
    Do not believe me, go to the Bolshoi Theater to see Children of Rosenthal. This is the most modern Russian opera with clones of Tchaikovsky, Wagner and ... prostitutes. Nearby "Prince Igor" has nothing to do.
  29. FunkschNNX
    FunkschNNX April 24 2014 09: 03
    +1
    The worse things are with the language, the more valuable is the ability to speak well,
    the more corrupt society - the more valuable morality, chastity,
    the more callous people are, the more valuable is kindness. And there were always enough cattle, only now they have more opportunities to declare themselves.
  30. Voenruk
    Voenruk April 24 2014 09: 17
    +1
    All was well 20 years ago. People like people, all kind smiled. They lived poorly, but in friendly terms. How did it happen that we were reformatted. We have changed a lot, have become more calculating and that the worst is indifferent. TV is the source of mass propaganda of vulgarity, take care of children. An urgent need to pass a law on censorship.
  31. andj61
    andj61 April 24 2014 09: 39
    0
    Quote: igor_m_p
    And more and more often I remember the biblical Sodom and Gomorrah ... They like Christians in the West, I don’t confuse anything ???


    It seems that we are all confused, considering them Christians. Once, while relaxing in Spain, I talked with a German (I sprite a little - still a Soviet school). He was very surprised that my whole family (4 people) wore Orthodox crosses. I asked who he was by religion. It turned out to be a Catholic, but he does not wear a cross, since this can be perceived not politically incorrect. And so he observes Christian rites, but within the limits so that no one sees and does not know, noting at the same time that a clear manifestation of attitude towards the Christian community can adversely affect his career, and he can simply be fired or not accepted for another . Looking at the Spaniards, I saw that they, too, are far from all wearing crosses (most do not), and this is traditionally a Catholic country!
    It turns out that for them the main thing is not religion at all, not belief, but some kind of political correctness there. You can’t not only propagandize, but even indicate belonging to a traditional religion, traditional values, but you can conduct propaganda in the style of the very biblical Sodom and Gomorrah.
    The warlike atheism of the times of the USSR is simply resting here.
  32. Giant thought
    Giant thought April 24 2014 09: 46
    +2
    Sodom and Gomorrah. Their end is known. Someone thinks these are fairy tales. But they are deeply mistaken. Nothing is in vain. Everything always has its own price, and everyone will have a moment when they have to pay and answer for everything.
  33. hhhhhhh
    hhhhhhh April 24 2014 09: 49
    +1
    Quote: Reasonable, 2,3
    What am I doing here? This is my opinion. And I hate the intelligentsia.

    And what are the claims to the intelligentsia? The teacher at school offended?
  34. alebor
    alebor April 24 2014 10: 22
    0
    The vulgarization of today's culture is very well traced in the field of everyday fashion (which is a very vivid expression of the culture and aesthetic development of a person, in some sense, an indicator). The most obvious example of this vulgarization is our favorite jeans. After all, the fashion is not just blue trousers, but pants are shabby, worn, and often deliberately torn. Some hundred years ago, even a beggar would be embarrassed to put on such pants, because it is ugly, and now the millionaire calmly walks in shabby rags (moreover, expensive rags). For people of the past, this would be complete savagery - how to wear a humiliating rag, in our time - the norm. Slop clothes are considered fashionable and even beautiful! Is this not clear evidence of the vulgarization of our culture, aesthetics and taste?
  35. Lenochka
    Lenochka April 24 2014 10: 50
    0
    The fact that young people, brought up on a low-standard culture, are mostly vulgar is obvious and natural. But what about adults, mature people brought up in highly moral times? Indeed, in fact, they should not be influenced by this "infantile culture". And there are many examples from life.
  36. washi
    washi April 24 2014 11: 34
    0
    Quote: turk
    In theaters today, they give a whole dozen performances, such as "Monologues of the Vagina", the action of which unfolds around the human reproductive organs:

    Medinsky said that such would not receive funding from the state.
    In my opinion, the only adequate minister of culture for the entire existence of the country, though I still need to read his books on the history of Russia (I’ll suddenly disagree)
  37. Max_Damage
    Max_Damage April 24 2014 13: 34
    0
    Guys, I really want to find a girl. I don’t care about culture, etc., but Mlyn, I feel like a stranger at this celebration of life, given that I do not have a promiscuous sex life and do not go to clubs.

    Honestly - I envy those who can afford it because of their personal qualities. It is better to be vulgar, immoral, etc., but happy and self-confident.
    1. Deff
      Deff April 24 2014 13: 42
      0
      Vicente Verdú (Elche, 1942) is a Spanish writer, journalist and economist. Verdú has a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Paris and is a member of the ...
  38. andrei72
    andrei72 April 24 2014 19: 02
    0
    Quote: Al_lexx
    Very correct and useful article.
    Only the essence of what is happening is not the propaganda of rudeness and vulgarity, but the deliberate and systematic destruction of the main unit of society and the foundations of traditional values, namely, the family. For globalists, family destruction, loss of self-identification, etc. there is the main task, which would ultimately get for its use a working, consuming and completely brainless, incapable biomass.
    Absolutely right! You can’t say more precisely and concisely! This is precisely what liberals and other husks led Russia to, actively encouraged by the United States and Western countries.