Military Review

Minsk presents new types of armored vehicles

45
From 9 to 12 July in Minsk will host an exhibition of military equipment "Milex-2014". One of the important segments of the exhibition will be the demonstration of a new modification of multi-purpose armored vehicles. These cars are created by the Belarusian manufacturer. "Minotor-Service".


Minsk presents new types of armored vehicles


Director General of Minotor-Service Valery Grebenshchikov in an interview for an information agency "ARMS-TASS" stated:

We intend to demonstrate full-scale samples of armored vehicles based on a light tracked vehicle of the 3T family.


The new machine has been developed in two versions of the housing on a torsion bar. A large building is supposed to be used for the production of CMVs (command and control machines), technical support machines, as well as mobile hospitals. Small corps will be used for WFP (infantry support vehicles) and anti-tank weapons systems.

According to the developers, you can place special equipment weighing up to 2,5 tons on new armored vehicles.

Valery Grebenshchikov:
Given the situation in Ukraine, we believe that these machines will find application in the Armed Forces of both Belarus and Russia.


The general director of Minotor-Service noted that armored vehicles can be offered to buyers in foreign countries.

Minotor-Service (formerly BelOboronService) is a Belarusian company that develops and modernizes military equipment. The main direction of production is armored vehicles. Examples of the equipment developed by the company: 2T Stalker military reconnaissance vehicle, 3T Mosquito transport tracked vehicle, CM-120 self-propelled mortar.

At the previous exhibition “Milex”, held in 2011, products were exposed to almost one hundred and fifty enterprises, design bureaus and institutes from five countries of the world. Interest in the samples of armored vehicles presented at Milex-2011 was shown by customers and experts from 15 countries.
Photos used:
http://minotor-service.by/
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ispaniard
    ispaniard April 23 2014 15: 30
    +26
    Brothers Belarusians make good technique! They especially like the BRDM 2T "Stalker". She is both the carrier of the PRTK and MANPADS and the secretive (Stealth System). wink
    1. ya.seliwerstov2013
      ya.seliwerstov2013 April 23 2014 15: 39
      +15
      I promise you, I swear!
      Thrive and grow
      There will be our Belarus!
      1. oenaraevskija
        oenaraevskija April 23 2014 19: 16
        +4
        Well, it bothers. Only not Russia. But it is necessary to become a single people. Personally, I do not see the difference between Belarus and Russia. A little different language? So what. Only in Russia there are so many dialects (and I came across this) that the devil himself will not understand. But I freely understand the Belarusian language, although I was born in Russia, apparently genes.
    2. COLUN
      COLUN April 23 2014 15: 54
      +10
      Quote: ispaniard
      Brothers Belarusians make good technique! They especially like the BRDM 2T "Stalker". She is both the carrier of the PRTK and MANPADS and the secretive (Stealth System).


      Well done! Lukashenko Respect!
      That's what is called cares about the security of the country!
      And here is how valiant lads fight with their own people. And in order not to run through the forests, you can fight right on the territory of the unit:


      Well, they can do this anyway:

      1. Sochi
        Sochi April 23 2014 16: 10
        +10
        According to the Sevastopol’s approval, the ship tugged to Odessa under its own power burst into Sevastopol, without a flag. Presented a photo from his window:
        1. Russ69
          Russ69 April 23 2014 16: 40
          +4
          Quote: Sochi
          According to the Sevastopol’s approval, the ship tugged to Odessa under its own power burst into Sevastopol, without a flag.

          Fun ... The ships give, and they run away again .... smile
          1. Foxmara
            Foxmara April 23 2014 19: 18
            +1
            they don’t feed there.
        2. vostok1982
          vostok1982 April 23 2014 17: 56
          +3
          The photo shows the Russian border guards ship of project 22460 "Rubin". There are no such ships in Ukraine.
        3. Windbreak
          Windbreak April 23 2014 18: 08
          +2
          This is the Russian border TFR of project 22460
        4. anfil
          anfil April 23 2014 19: 37
          +2
          It looks like.
          Ruby
          Project: 22460, code “Hunter”
          Home port: Russian Coast Guard [Russia]
          Owner: Border Service of the FSB of the Russian Federation [Russia]
          Operator: Border Service of the FSB of the Russian Federation [Russia]
          Flight No: 046
          MMSI: 273570072
          Building No: 501
          Built by: 14.11.2009
          Place of construction:
          Primorsky Shipyard / SF "Almaz"
          [Saint Petersburg, Russia

          Note: Black Sea-Azov Border Administration
          Mortgaged: September 03 2007
          Launched: 26 June 2009 year
    3. sub307
      sub307 April 23 2014 16: 07
      +2
      Yes, "Stalker" is a very good "device" in its category. TTX at a level like.
  2. nvn_co
    nvn_co April 23 2014 15: 32
    +7
    Cool machine, I think it will definitely go into production, cool tractor! And the main thing sounded how right: "Given the situation in Ukraine, we believe that these machines will find application in the Armed Forces of Belarus and Russia":)
  3. tnship2
    tnship2 April 23 2014 15: 36
    +12
    Neighbors in Belarus and in electronics seem to have kept some power. To cooperate and fill their armored vehicles with their brains. That would not be easy prey for anti-tank weapons.
  4. nikcris
    nikcris April 23 2014 15: 36
    +7
    Well, well done, work.
  5. lexx2038
    lexx2038 April 23 2014 15: 38
    +4
    The right way, comrades!
  6. Sevastopol
    Sevastopol April 23 2014 15: 41
    +4


    Army riots
  7. Sevastopol
    Sevastopol April 23 2014 15: 42
    +1


    And who are the masks?
    1. vostok1982
      vostok1982 April 23 2014 18: 35
      +2
      masked - commissars from the Nazis. They say that in the event of hostilities they will be like detachments. Such are the things.
  8. kelevra
    kelevra April 23 2014 15: 43
    +6
    We would return to Russia, together we would create the best weapons and the country would become even more powerful and united!
  9. Anatole Klim
    Anatole Klim April 23 2014 15: 48
    +5
    We will be honest to the end, not a single sample of Belarusian armored vehicles has been adopted and has not gone into production even in Belarus itself, not to mention foreign customers. We’ll wait for Kurganets-25, Boomerang, and then let Belarusians join the production.
  10. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 April 23 2014 15: 48
    +25
    Well, Belarusians should not be discounted, especially when they got a similar miracle machine - 2T "Stalker":




    But, given the not very rosy financial situation in Belarus, it is hardly believed that all the equipment presented at the exhibition will go to the troops, although the Old Man is really well done.
    1. ispaniard
      ispaniard April 23 2014 15: 57
      +4
      I hope Vladimir Vladimirovich and Batskaya will agree on the supply of "STALKER" to the Russian army as a reconnaissance and sabotage vehicle wink
      1. Billy Bones
        Billy Bones April 23 2014 17: 20
        +1
        What for? "Stalker" is a development of ten years ago. now Russia has an almost analogous "Terminator".
        1. zeleznijdorojnik
          zeleznijdorojnik April 23 2014 22: 32
          +4
          It is interesting to know the performance characteristics. The fact that the brothers are developing such a technique is certainly good, but it would be better to unite our defense industry and not duplicate each other’s machines — a stalker and a terminator. It would be economically feasible to choose a project and put it on the conveyor there, plus to all unify the equipment of the troops of both our states. Belarusians are making us tractors on the MZKT.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. Voenruk
    Voenruk April 23 2014 15: 51
    -2
    something is really narrow caterpillars get stuck
  12. tnship2
    tnship2 April 23 2014 15: 51
    +6
    Quote: Anatole Klim
    We will be honest to the end, not a single sample of Belarusian armored vehicles has been adopted and has not gone into production even in Belarus itself, not to mention foreign customers. We’ll wait for Kurganets-25, Boomerang, and then let Belarusians join the production.

    I completely agree. The RPG does not understand what is stealth in front of him.
  13. Az_esm
    Az_esm April 23 2014 15: 54
    +1
    Cool video!!! For that fought for it and ran!!!
  14. propolsky
    propolsky April 23 2014 15: 55
    0
    And why is it not in the troops of the Republic of Belarus? It is strange that the people did not take the best to defend their homeland ...
  15. Smiles to you
    Smiles to you April 23 2014 15: 57
    +2
    I would like to visit this exhibition. Yes, and Minsk, a beautiful city to see ...
    Alas ... unfortunately ...
  16. mig31
    mig31 April 23 2014 15: 57
    +1
    Ours, it is ours ..
  17. Giant thought
    Giant thought April 23 2014 16: 17
    +3
    Well done Belarusians living with their defense industry, produces products on the mountain.
  18. Roman1970
    Roman1970 April 23 2014 16: 18
    +1
    Old Man is going the right way!
  19. Barakuda
    Barakuda April 23 2014 16: 21
    +7
    Neighbors are great! And "Shilka" was modernized, "Osu". They come up with something new .. One problem is in the customers.
    And who remembers how a Geisoyuz balloon (moderately controlled) was shot down at the border? Without a twinge of conscience, I broke it - get it. Well done Lukash, did not chew snot. Now the Poles hate and fear him .. And they are pissing already now, in the same place like NATO exercises, and Russian "falcons" arrived there at the invitation of Lukashenka.
    1. Anatole Klim
      Anatole Klim April 23 2014 16: 40
      +2
      Quote: Barracuda
      And who remembers how a Goysoyuz balloon (moderately controlled) was shot down at the border? Without a twinge of conscience, violated - get it.

      If we really remember everything, then we must honestly say about the "plush landing", when a Swedish light aircraft flew unnoticed to Minsk and scattered teddy bears, and the Air Force and the Belarusian Border Committee denied the border violation for three days, only then Father removed these two generals. But the air defense of Belarus was one of the best in the CIS, and now the skies of Belarus are guarded by Russian aircraft. Already tired of "Hurray! Hurray! YOUNG MAN! MAN!" Be honest at least in front of yourself, never hush up problems, because of this they will not be solved by themselves.
  20. TekhnarMAF
    TekhnarMAF April 23 2014 16: 25
    +7
    Yes, maybe not hi-fi, but people work, and what multi-axis chassis do they make? There are no analogues in the world! Experience comes while working - on the Maidan they just get dull!
    1. Barakuda
      Barakuda April 23 2014 16: 33
      +2
      Indeed! "MAZ" are still those warriors!
  21. 1812 1945
    1812 1945 April 23 2014 16: 32
    +3
    [i] [/ i] [i] [/ i]
    Quote: [i
    nikcris] Well, well done, work. [/ i]

    And thank God! Belarus is a benefit, and Russia will acquire good equipment without overpaying the "corruption component". Until Taburetkin was returned (by the marshal).
  22. Barakuda
    Barakuda April 23 2014 16: 37
    +1
    Quote: 1812 1945
    Until Taburetkin was returned (by the marshal).

    - it’s better for him to graze deer .. it's better than sitting.
  23. 1812 1945
    1812 1945 April 23 2014 16: 44
    +1
    Quote: Barracuda
    Quote: 1812 1945
    Until Taburetkin was returned (by the marshal).

    - it’s better for him to graze deer .. it's better than sitting.

    Yes, sorry for the creatures of God. He and them about .., s .. ka.
  24. sokrat7
    sokrat7 April 23 2014 16: 53
    +3
    But it’s true, Belarusians are great. Quietly, without tension, without cursing with anyone, they calmly pull the strap.
  25. b.t.a.
    b.t.a. April 23 2014 17: 07
    +1
    Was in Belarus, in general order. Everywhere cleanliness, excellent roads, sown fields. Work people do not Maidan. And in the geyrop, the Old Man is being held for a dictator.
  26. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz April 23 2014 17: 16
    +3
    It is a pity there is no article on the means of electronic warfare. They are also well developed in Belarus.
  27. Aleks tv
    Aleks tv April 23 2014 17: 19
    +3
    Everyone knows about 2T Stalker, but TGM 3T interesting mafinka:

    Diesel, automatic gearbox, hydraulic-volume-type rotation mechanism, optimal weight distribution for installed units (dvigl and automatic transmission in the center), option with 5 or 6 track rollers, open or closed, with a water jet or screw.
    Possible weapons:
    AGS-17, NSV, ATGM, MANPADS.
    Features:
    - weight - 4 (4,9) tons;
    - payload - 0.9 tons (5 fighters + 1 crew) or 2,5 tons.
    - length 4.7 m;
    - width 2.5 m;
    - height 1.6 m;
    - clearance 345 mm,
    - turn around 1 m;
    - speed 90 km / h;
    - fuel consumption 30 l per 100km .;
    - range to 400 kilometers;
    - water speed 5 km / h.

    Those. on its basis it is possible to make a series of narrowly specialized vehicles and equip them with reconnaissance groups or even highly mobile BTGr.
    Interesting…
    I have only one question as a tanker - sho for him "harp"? How practical is it?
    Of the shortcomings - not armored. Those. a sort of wide UAZ on tracks ... I think that our "Ukhtyshka" will be cheaper in this way.

    Conclusion: 3T vehicle for reconnaissance, equipping light combat groups and as an additional multi-functional light transporter in conventional Brigades.
    Very good when staged in a series - cheapening both the machine itself and its maintenance.
    good
    1. Magic archer
      Magic archer April 23 2014 17: 43
      +2
      Such would be for hunting and fishing))) good
    2. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 April 23 2014 18: 16
      +4
      Alexey, this is an analogue of the MT-LB "Motolega", only in a lighter version.
      Given the wooded area of ​​the territory of Belarus, the very thing.
      You can safely call this pepelats "Partisan's all-terrain vehicle". smile
      By the way, in the third video, you can see it on the go.
      Goes well, infection. good
      1. Aleks tv
        Aleks tv April 23 2014 18: 29
        +1
        Quote: wanderer_032
        Given the wooded area of ​​the territory of Belarus, the very thing.
        You can safely call this pepelats "Partisan's all-terrain vehicle".

        Hi Sasha.
        hi
        Straight to my thoughts letter by letter voiced, I did not write them ...
        laughing good
        1. wanderer_032
          wanderer_032 April 23 2014 19: 15
          +1
          And I propose to call the Belarusian BRDMku 2T "Batkin Surprise". laughing
    3. Alex 1977
      Alex 1977 April 23 2014 22: 34
      +2
      Quote: Aleks tv

      Those. on its basis it is possible to make a series of narrowly specialized vehicles and equip them with reconnaissance groups or even highly mobile BTGr.
      Of the shortcomings - not armored. Those. a sort of wide UAZ on tracks ... I think that our "Ukhtyshka" will be cheaper in this way.

      Conclusion: 3T vehicle for reconnaissance, equipping light combat groups and as an additional multi-functional light transporter in conventional Brigades.
      Very good when staged in a series - cheapening both the machine itself and its maintenance.
      good

      There are two points.
      First - not armored - this is not a flaw.
      This is the cross. And to the grave of the crew. For a reconnaissance vehicle, this is a sentence without discussion. It’s better to upgrade the old BRDM-2. Or use the same MT-LB. At least from Kalash or M-ki will not put, something more serious will be needed.
      Regarding the light transporter, first of all I am deeply convinced that in our time any army transport must have bulletproof armor. Any.
      Remember the first Chechnya.
      Urals with armor plates on the doors, so that the fighters would have at least some chance. And to Chechnya, Afghanistan.
      Well, what's the point in this car?
      Why is it better than MT-LB?
      Fuel consumption is less and the maximum speed is greater, but there is no reservation, the weapons are placed openly, aggregated, not unified with anything in service or promising, as I understand it?
      Curiosity. Yes, and produced in a friendly to us now Belarusians.
      But Old Man is not eternal and not young.
      And who will guarantee that the Yankees, taking advantage of the moment, will not pour another five billion dollars into Belarus?
      And there is enough scumbag for Maidans everywhere.
      And we also have it, it’s just that the Power is not the same, it will immediately pull out its hands and put it in the ass.
      And in truth, Lukashenko himself is still cunning. Canny.
      Now I’m already forgotten, but remember how Belarus and I swore over gas several years ago.
      No, we must do military equipment for ourselves in full.
      In order not to depend on anyone. Maximum additional assembly capacity.
      1. mark7
        mark7 April 23 2014 23: 03
        0
        Quote: Alexey 1977
        In order not to depend on anyone.

        I completely agree, for myself, and for myself, as with the engines for helicopters in Ukraine they have already been burned
      2. Aleks tv
        Aleks tv April 24 2014 00: 12
        0
        Quote: Alexey 1977
        This is the cross. And to the grave of the crew.

        Quote: Alexey 1977
        Remember the first Chechnya.
        Urals with armor plates on the doors, so that the fighters would have at least some chance.

        The namesake, my friend ...
        That for me, ANY car with armor less than that of a tank - A Coffin ...
        I’m a tanker.
        wink
        So I absolutely agree with your arguments, but I remember well the Czech Republic 1,2.

        But:
        Every machine in the Army has own niche of application.
        This conveyor for combat unit this ... so as not to "walk on your feet" and "not to carry on your shoulders" - it happens that this is necessary.
        And don't forget about NOT combat opportunities for use, also in bulk in the Army.
        Something like that.
        wink
        1. Alex 1977
          Alex 1977 April 24 2014 20: 44
          0
          Quote: Aleks tv
          Quote: Alexey 1977
          This is the cross. And to the grave of the crew.

          Quote: Alexey 1977
          Remember the first Chechnya.
          Urals with armor plates on the doors, so that the fighters would have at least some chance.

          The namesake, my friend ...
          That for me, ANY car with armor less than that of a tank - A Coffin ...
          I’m a tanker.
          wink
          So I absolutely agree with your arguments, but I remember well the Czech Republic 1,2.

          But:
          Every machine in the Army has own niche of application.
          This conveyor for combat unit this ... so as not to "walk on your feet" and "not to carry on your shoulders" - it happens that this is necessary.
          And don't forget about NOT combat opportunities for use, also in bulk in the Army.
          Something like that.
          wink

          I don’t speak for others, but I personally am better off legs. If at least I have time to dive into the ditch.
          And from this thing one sensible machine gunner will make a colander sooner than the guys have time to jump from it.
          regarding non-combat tasks, I agree, but
          and. For some reason, these non-combat missions end with bronics on the doors anyway.
          b. What kind of gesheft does this thing have in comparison with a motorcycle league?
          Once again - less fuel consumption and higher top speed. All.
          We have our own oil. smile Fly a hundred on this thing .. Well ... To each his own ...
          But is it worth losing because of this:
          In the minus there is some kind of armor, a machine gun in a normal tower, mastered to the utter amazement of cheap and completely domestic equipment, well, as the rubber band instead of the caterpillar suggests below.
          To hell with such happiness.
    4. zeleznijdorojnik
      zeleznijdorojnik April 23 2014 23: 41
      0
      Ordinary rubber track. Not very reliable, especially with such rollers.
      1. Aleks tv
        Aleks tv April 24 2014 00: 15
        0
        Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
        Ordinary rubber track. Not very reliable, especially with such rollers.

        This, Abdullah, is completely sucks.
        This was my MAJOR question in a post about this car.
        I do not know her, have not met in practice.
        request
        The gusli should be RELIABLE, otherwise there is nothing to fence the garden with the car on the tracks - they will suffocate.
  28. wanderer_032
    wanderer_032 April 23 2014 18: 01
    +1
    Here is a video of the BRDM 2T "Stalker", the 3T transporter and the BMP "Cobra" on the move:




    1. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 April 23 2014 18: 12
      +1
      Another video about Belarusian armor:

  29. Leshka
    Leshka April 23 2014 19: 25
    +1
    anyway dad well done
  30. APASUS
    APASUS April 23 2014 20: 18
    0
    That’s what I don’t understand, so why aren’t we trying to produce equipment together?
    1. Artyom
      Artyom April 23 2014 21: 07
      +3
      Old Man does not give kickbacks!
    2. mark7
      mark7 April 23 2014 23: 08
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      That’s what I don’t understand, so why aren’t we trying to produce equipment together?

      kings are changing, and politics too, everyone should have his own spoon
  31. voliador
    voliador April 24 2014 01: 46
    0
    They should do this technique themselves!