Minsk presents new types of armored vehicles

From 9 to 12 July in Minsk will host an exhibition of military equipment "Milex-2014". One of the important segments of the exhibition will be the demonstration of a new modification of multi-purpose armored vehicles. These cars are created by the Belarusian manufacturer. "Minotor-Service".

Director General of Minotor-Service Valery Grebenshchikov in an interview for an information agency "ARMS-TASS" stated:

We intend to demonstrate full-scale samples of armored vehicles based on a light tracked vehicle of the 3T family.

The new machine has been developed in two versions of the housing on a torsion bar. A large building is supposed to be used for the production of CMVs (command and control machines), technical support machines, as well as mobile hospitals. Small corps will be used for WFP (infantry support vehicles) and anti-tank weapons systems.

According to the developers, you can place special equipment weighing up to 2,5 tons on new armored vehicles.

Valery Grebenshchikov:

Given the situation in Ukraine, we believe that these machines will find application in the Armed Forces of both Belarus and Russia.

The general director of Minotor-Service noted that armored vehicles can be offered to buyers in foreign countries.

Minotor-Service (formerly BelOboronService) is a Belarusian company that develops and modernizes military equipment. The main direction of production is armored vehicles. Examples of the equipment developed by the company: 2T Stalker military reconnaissance vehicle, 3T Mosquito transport tracked vehicle, CM-120 self-propelled mortar.

At the previous exhibition “Milex”, held in 2011, products were exposed to almost one hundred and fifty enterprises, design bureaus and institutes from five countries of the world. Interest in the samples of armored vehicles presented at Milex-2011 was shown by customers and experts from 15 countries.

Comments

[ispaniard]

Brothers Belarusians make good technique! They especially like the BRDM 2T "Stalker". She is both the carrier of the PRTK and MANPADS and the secretive (Stealth System).

[ya.seliwerstov2013]

I promise you, I swear!
Thrive and grow
There will be our Belarus!

[oenaraevskija]

Well, it bothers. Only not Russia. But it is necessary to become a single people. Personally, I do not see the difference between Belarus and Russia. A little different language? So what. Only in Russia there are so many dialects (and I came across this) that the devil himself will not understand. But I freely understand the Belarusian language, although I was born in Russia, apparently genes.

[COLUN]

Quote: ispaniard

Brothers Belarusians make good technique! They especially like the BRDM 2T "Stalker". She is both the carrier of the PRTK and MANPADS and the secretive (Stealth System).

Well done! Lukashenko Respect!
That's what is called cares about the security of the country!
And here is how valiant lads fight with their own people. And in order not to run through the forests, you can fight right on the territory of the unit:


Well, they can do this anyway:

[Sochi]

According to the Sevastopol’s approval, the ship tugged to Odessa under its own power burst into Sevastopol, without a flag. Presented a photo from his window:

[Russ69]

Quote: Sochi

According to the Sevastopol’s approval, the ship tugged to Odessa under its own power burst into Sevastopol, without a flag.

Fun ... The ships give, and they run away again ....

[Foxmara]

they don’t feed there.

[vostok1982]

The photo shows the Russian border guards ship of project 22460 "Rubin". There are no such ships in Ukraine.

[Windbreak]

This is the Russian border TFR of project 22460

[anfil]

It looks like.
Ruby
Project: 22460, code "Hunter"
Home port: Russian Coast Guard [Russia]
Owner: Border Service of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation [Russia]
Operator: Border Service of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation [Russia]
Board number: 046
MMSI: 273570072
Building number: 501
Built: 14.11.2009
Place of construction:
Primorsky Shipyard / SF "Almaz"
[Saint Petersburg, Russia

Note: Black Sea-Azov Border Administration
Mortgaged: September 03 2007
Launched: 26 June 2009 year

[sub307]

Yes, "Stalker" is a very good "device" in its category. TTX at a level like.

[nvn_co]

Cool machine, I think it will definitely go into production, cool tractor! And the main thing sounded how right: "Given the situation in Ukraine, we believe that these machines will find application in the Armed Forces of Belarus and Russia":)

[tnship2]

Neighbors in Belarus and in electronics seem to have kept some power. To cooperate and fill their armored vehicles with their brains. That would not be easy prey for anti-tank weapons.

[nikcris]

Well, well done, work.

[lexx2038]

The right way, comrades!

[Sevastopol]

Army riots

[Sevastopol]

And who are the masks?

[vostok1982]

masked - commissars from the Nazis. They say that in the event of hostilities they will be like detachments. Such are the things.

[kelevra]

We would return to Russia, together we would create the best weapons and the country would become even more powerful and united!

[Anatole Klim]

We will be honest to the end, not a single sample of Belarusian armored vehicles has been adopted and has not gone into production even in Belarus itself, not to mention foreign customers. We’ll wait for Kurganets-25, Boomerang, and then let Belarusians join the production.

[Roman 1977]

Well, Belarusians should not be discounted, especially when they got a similar miracle machine - 2T "Stalker":

But, given the not very rosy financial situation in Belarus, it is hardly believed that all the equipment presented at the exhibition will go to the troops, although the Old Man is really well done.

[ispaniard]

I hope Vladimir Vladimirovich and Batskaya will agree on the supply of "STALKER" to the Russian army as a reconnaissance and sabotage vehicle

[Billy Bones]

What for? "Stalker" is a development of ten years ago. now Russia has an almost analogous "Terminator".

[zeleznijdorojnik]

It is interesting to know the performance characteristics. The fact that the brothers are developing such a technique is certainly good, but it would be better to unite our defense industry and not duplicate each other’s machines — a stalker and a terminator. It would be economically feasible to choose a project and put it on the conveyor there, plus to all unify the equipment of the troops of both our states. Belarusians are making us tractors on the MZKT.

[Voenruk]

something is really narrow caterpillars get stuck

[tnship2]

Quote: Anatole Klim

We will be honest to the end, not a single sample of Belarusian armored vehicles has been adopted and has not gone into production even in Belarus itself, not to mention foreign customers. We’ll wait for Kurganets-25, Boomerang, and then let Belarusians join the production.

I completely agree. The RPG does not understand what is stealth in front of him.

[Az_esm]

Cool video!!! For that fought for it and ran!!!

[propolsky]

And why is it not in the troops of the Republic of Belarus? It is strange that the people did not take the best to defend their homeland ...

[Smiles to you]

I would like to visit this exhibition. Yes, and Minsk, a beautiful city to see ...
Alas ... unfortunately ...

[mig31]

Ours, it is ours ..

[Giant thought]

Well done Belarusians living with their defense industry, produces products on the mountain.

[Roman1970]

Old Man is going the right way!

[Barakuda]

Neighbors are great! And "Shilka" was modernized, "Osu". They come up with something new .. One problem is in the customers.
And who remembers how a Geisoyuz balloon (moderately controlled) was shot down at the border? Without a twinge of conscience, I broke it - get it. Well done Lukash, did not chew snot. Now the Poles hate and fear him .. And they are pissing already now, in the same place like NATO exercises, and Russian "falcons" arrived there at the invitation of Lukashenka.

[Anatole Klim]

Quote: Barracuda

And who remembers how a Goysoyuz balloon (moderately controlled) was shot down at the border? Without a twinge of conscience, violated - get it.

If we really remember everything, then we must honestly say about the "plush landing", when a Swedish light aircraft flew unnoticed to Minsk and scattered teddy bears, and the Air Force and the Belarusian Border Committee denied the border violation for three days, only then Father removed these two generals. But the air defense of Belarus was one of the best in the CIS, and now the skies of Belarus are guarded by Russian aircraft. Already tired of "Hurray! Hurray! YOUNG MAN! MAN!" Be honest at least in front of yourself, never hush up problems, because of this they will not be solved by themselves.

[TekhnarMAF]

Yes, maybe not hi-fi, but people work, and what multi-axis chassis do they make? There are no analogues in the world! Experience comes while working - on the Maidan they just get dull!

[Barakuda]

Indeed! "MAZ" are still those warriors!

[1812 1945]

[i] [/ i] [i] [/ i]

Quote: [i

nikcris] Well, well done, work. [/ i]

And thank God! Belarus is a benefit, and Russia will acquire good equipment without overpaying the "corruption component". Until Taburetkin was returned (by the marshal).

[Barakuda]

Quote: 1812 1945

Until Taburetkin was returned (by the marshal).

- it’s better for him to graze deer .. it's better than sitting.

[1812 1945]

Quote: Barracuda

Quote: 1812 1945

Until Taburetkin was returned (by the marshal).

- it’s better for him to graze deer .. it's better than sitting.

Yes, sorry for the creatures of God. He and them about .., s .. ka.

[socrates7]

But it’s true, Belarusians are great. Quietly, without tension, without cursing with anyone, they calmly pull the strap.

[b.t.a.]

Was in Belarus, in general order. Everywhere cleanliness, excellent roads, sown fields. Work people do not Maidan. And in the geyrop, the Old Man is being held for a dictator.

[zulusuluz]

It is a pity there is no article on the means of electronic warfare. They are also well developed in Belarus.

[Aleks tv]

Everyone knows about 2T Stalker, but TGM 3T interesting mafinka:

Diesel, automatic gearbox, hydraulic-volume-type rotation mechanism, optimal weight distribution for installed units (dvigl and automatic transmission in the center), option with 5 or 6 track rollers, open or closed, with a water jet or screw.
Possible weapons:
AGS-17, NSV, ATGM, MANPADS.
Features:
- weight - 4 (4,9) tons;
- payload - 0.9 tons (5 fighters + 1 crew) or 2,5 tons.
- length 4.7 m;
- width 2.5 m;
- height 1.6 m;
- clearance 345 mm,
- turn around 1 m;
- speed 90 km / h;
- fuel consumption 30 l per 100km .;
- range to 400 kilometers;
- water speed 5 km / h.

Those. on its basis it is possible to make a series of narrowly specialized vehicles and equip them with reconnaissance groups or even highly mobile BTGr.
Interesting…
I have only one question as a tanker - sho for him "harp"? How practical is it?
Of the shortcomings - not armored. Those. a sort of wide UAZ on tracks ... I think that our "Ukhtyshka" will be cheaper in this way.

Conclusion: 3T vehicle for reconnaissance, equipping light combat groups and as an additional multi-functional light transporter in conventional Brigades.
Very good when staged in a series - cheapening both the machine itself and its maintenance.

[Magic archer]

Such would be for hunting and fishing)))

[wanderer_032]

Alexey, this is an analogue of the MT-LB "Motolega", only in a lighter version.
Given the wooded area of ​​the territory of Belarus, the very thing.
You can safely call this pepelats "Partisan's all-terrain vehicle".
By the way, in the third video, you can see it on the go.
Goes well, infection.

[Aleks tv]

Quote: wanderer_032

Given the wooded area of ​​the territory of Belarus, the very thing.
You can safely call this pepelats "Partisan's all-terrain vehicle".

Hi Sasha.

Straight to my thoughts letter by letter voiced, I did not write them ...

[wanderer_032]

And I propose to call the Belarusian BRDMku 2T "Batkin Surprise".

[Alex 1977]

Quote: Aleks tv

Those. on its basis it is possible to make a series of narrowly specialized vehicles and equip them with reconnaissance groups or even highly mobile BTGr.
Of the shortcomings - not armored. Those. a sort of wide UAZ on tracks ... I think that our "Ukhtyshka" will be cheaper in this way.

Conclusion: 3T vehicle for reconnaissance, equipping light combat groups and as an additional multi-functional light transporter in conventional Brigades.
Very good when staged in a series - cheapening both the machine itself and its maintenance.

There are two points.
First - not armored - this is not a flaw.
This is the cross. And to the grave of the crew. For a reconnaissance vehicle, this is a sentence without discussion. It’s better to upgrade the old BRDM-2. Or use the same MT-LB. At least from Kalash or M-ki will not put, something more serious will be needed.
Regarding the light transporter, first of all I am deeply convinced that in our time any army transport must have bulletproof armor. Any.
Remember the first Chechnya.
Urals with armor plates on the doors, so that the fighters would have at least some chance. And to Chechnya, Afghanistan.
Well, what's the point in this car?
Why is it better than MT-LB?
Fuel consumption is less and the maximum speed is greater, but there is no reservation, the weapons are placed openly, aggregated, not unified with anything in service or promising, as I understand it?
Curiosity. Yes, and produced in a friendly to us now Belarusians.
But Old Man is not eternal and not young.
And who will guarantee that the Yankees, taking advantage of the moment, will not pour another five billion dollars into Belarus?
And there is enough scumbag for Maidans everywhere.
And we also have it, it’s just that the Power is not the same, it will immediately pull out its hands and put it in the ass.
And in truth, Lukashenko himself is still cunning. Canny.
Now I’m already forgotten, but remember how Belarus and I swore over gas several years ago.
No, we must do military equipment for ourselves in full.
In order not to depend on anyone. Maximum additional assembly capacity.

[mark7]

Quote: Alexey 1977

In order not to depend on anyone.

I completely agree, for myself, and for myself, as with the engines for helicopters in Ukraine they have already been burned

[Aleks tv]

Quote: Alexey 1977

This is the cross. And to the grave of the crew.

Quote: Alexey 1977

Remember the first Chechnya.
Urals with armor plates on the doors, so that the fighters would have at least some chance.

The namesake, my friend ...
That for me, ANY car with armor less than that of a tank - A Coffin ...
I’m a tanker.

So I absolutely agree with your arguments, but I remember well the Czech Republic 1,2.

But:
Every machine in the Army has own niche of application.
This conveyor for combat unit this ... so as not to "walk on your feet" and "not to carry on your shoulders" - it happens that this is necessary.
And don't forget about NOT combat opportunities for use, also in bulk in the Army.
Something like that.

[Alex 1977]

Quote: Aleks tv

Quote: Alexey 1977

This is the cross. And to the grave of the crew.

Quote: Alexey 1977

Remember the first Chechnya.
Urals with armor plates on the doors, so that the fighters would have at least some chance.

The namesake, my friend ...
That for me, ANY car with armor less than that of a tank - A Coffin ...
I’m a tanker.

So I absolutely agree with your arguments, but I remember well the Czech Republic 1,2.

But:
Every machine in the Army has own niche of application.
This conveyor for combat unit this ... so as not to "walk on your feet" and "not to carry on your shoulders" - it happens that this is necessary.
And don't forget about NOT combat opportunities for use, also in bulk in the Army.
Something like that.

I don’t speak for others, but I personally am better off legs. If at least I have time to dive into the ditch.
And from this thing one sensible machine gunner will make a colander sooner than the guys have time to jump from it.
regarding non-combat tasks, I agree, but
and. For some reason, these non-combat missions end with bronics on the doors anyway.
b. What kind of gesheft does this thing have in comparison with a motorcycle league?
Once again - less fuel consumption and higher top speed. All.
We have our own oil. Fly a hundred on this thing .. Well ... To each his own ...
But is it worth losing because of this:
In the minus there is some kind of armor, a machine gun in a normal tower, mastered to the utter amazement of cheap and completely domestic equipment, well, as the rubber band instead of the caterpillar suggests below.
To hell with such happiness.

[zeleznijdorojnik]

Ordinary rubber track. Not very reliable, especially with such rollers.

[Aleks tv]

Quote: zeleznijdorojnik

Ordinary rubber track. Not very reliable, especially with such rollers.

This, Abdullah, is completely sucks.
This was my MAJOR question in a post about this car.
I do not know her, have not met in practice.

The gusli should be RELIABLE, otherwise there is nothing to fence the garden with the car on the tracks - they will suffocate.

[wanderer_032]

Here is a video of the BRDM 2T "Stalker", the 3T transporter and the BMP "Cobra" on the move:

[wanderer_032]

Another video about Belarusian armor:

[Leshka]

anyway dad well done

[APASUS]

That’s what I don’t understand, so why aren’t we trying to produce equipment together?

[Artyom]

Old Man does not give kickbacks!

[mark7]

Quote: APASUS

That’s what I don’t understand, so why aren’t we trying to produce equipment together?

kings are changing, and politics too, everyone should have his own spoon

[voliador]

They should do this technique themselves!