Military Review

21 April at the test site in Serpukhov Strategic Missile Forces tested the robotic complex

53
On April 21, at the test site in Serpukhov, the strategic missile forces of Russia tested the latest mobile robotic-reconnaissance and reconnaissance complex. The complex is a radio-controlled crewless off-road combat vehicle on a tracked chassis. The machine is equipped with the Kord light machine gun tank a Kalashnikov machine gun and a 30 mm easel automatic grenade launcher, reports RT Russian.


53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Roman1970
    Roman1970 April 22 2014 08: 29
    +12
    Well, there are drones, now there will be unmanned vehicles! laughing But seriously, why not?
    1. Sid.74
      Sid.74 April 22 2014 08: 39
      0
      AGS-30 there to the heap! Let even with limited ammunition! Either such serious restrictions on weight, or impact affects the electronics! what
      1. Sid.74
        Sid.74 April 22 2014 08: 44
        +6
        Here's a video about the FSB special forces! There, at about the 5 minute of the 2 video clip, one with grenade launchers and the other with a machine gun!
        1. PN
          PN April 22 2014 09: 03
          +2
          These crumbs for special forces in urban environments. In the forest or cross country will not pass due to the small size. They will stumble into the nearest fallen tree, not to mention the broken truck roads.
        2. DimychDV
          DimychDV April 22 2014 09: 56
          0
          This is how they will all be attacked sometime (mansions). But not the peasants.
      2. Vadim12
        Vadim12 April 22 2014 08: 48
        +2
        It was equipped with a 30mm grenade launcher, PKT and a Kord machine gun. They just didn't show it on video.
        1. Sid.74
          Sid.74 April 22 2014 08: 53
          0
          Quote: Vadim12
          It was equipped with a 30mm grenade launcher, PKT and a Kord machine gun. They just didn't show it on video.

          Thank you for the clarification! hi Shoot mounted grenades, a useful skill for the robot!
      3. True
        True April 22 2014 09: 51
        +3
        The body there would be some thread. What would the cargo / wounded could carry.
    2. Very old
      Very old April 22 2014 08: 45
      +13
      Very, very seriously
      Children must be protected
      And the "shame" can still be done different and useful
      (but as long as I remember, Russia fought "alive")
      There are not so many of us

      Remember the big debate on the forum about scientific mouths?
      This is where they are needed (rather than wiping pants over the archives)
      1. Lyubimov
        Lyubimov April 22 2014 09: 03
        +1
        Quote: Very old
        (but as long as I remember, Russia fought "alive")


        Well, don't tell me, where did it come from "Not by numbers - but by skill!"
      2. DimychDV
        DimychDV April 22 2014 09: 57
        +1
        Respect!
        And those who get along with such a technique. But just what is it like on a crossroads, in ravines, in rocks, streams, swamps? ..
    3. Civil
      Civil April 22 2014 08: 51
      +9
      Now it will start "yes, it's easier for an armored personnel carrier with soldiers", "you can shoot all observation devices" ...
      Heap of comments in the style of "a fool-bayonet bullet well done", but one must think that it is better to let the robot burn out than a patrol of people to be ambushed!
    4. zarya
      zarya April 22 2014 08: 52
      +1
      It’s good that they did such a thing. It remains only to make a fully autonomous machine - that is, capable of acting independently and not only being controlled by radio.
      1. True
        True April 22 2014 09: 54
        +2
        There is some autonomy. He seems to be able to patrol himself ... yesterday the plot was on TV.
      2. gizz
        gizz April 22 2014 12: 51
        0
        Belarus seems to have something similar.
    5. DimychDV
      DimychDV April 22 2014 09: 51
      +1
      "Truckers" with driverless drivers will soon be removed.
      Still, the main thing in the thick of the battle is a person who is able to make the right decision. But it is better to take it not in the thick, but aside - where the thunder of guns and wounds do not interfere.
  2. mejik
    mejik April 22 2014 08: 30
    +1
    now artificial intelligence would go there ...
    1. Afinogen
      Afinogen April 22 2014 08: 33
      +3
      Quote: mejik
      now artificial intelligence would go there ...


      It’s harder with Rusum laughing easier to put a soldier behind the wheel.
    2. mamont5
      mamont5 April 22 2014 08: 39
      +2
      Quote: mejik
      now artificial intelligence would go there ...


      Soon we will adopt the Terminators. Model T-800, and there it will reach the T-1000. smile
    3. Cruorvult
      Cruorvult April 22 2014 08: 53
      +1
      It’s hard to call some people reasonable, but give it to him artificially, don’t you think he would just want to go die for people)?
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. DimychDV
      DimychDV April 22 2014 10: 00
      +3
      The Americans are let out without any reason - and nothing. Paaadum, with a dozen bandyukes, they grabbed three or two unnecessary Arabs from the road ... Or in Afghanistan - well, there’s more weddings, fewer weddings ... they don’t walk in America, so let them fear every bush at home while the American army protects them.
      There we have the highlanders at their weddings in Moscow scorching as at home. Just think - well, this turn will fall at the end of the pioneer camp. This is not at their home ...
  3. Corsair
    Corsair April 22 2014 08: 32
    +5
    It is necessary, necessary, to move in all areas of development of the "defense industry." There is no other way out.

    Or we or us ...
  4. ambiorix
    ambiorix April 22 2014 08: 32
    +1
    This is of course very cool, but how many bursts of Kalash or machine gun will all this optics with weapons without armor tower survive?
    I think in a real battle the guys in the video would feel much safer behind an ordinary APC
    1. starhina01
      starhina01 April 22 2014 08: 41
      +1
      to shoot as a reconnaissance vehicle, a stubborn point, a land mine soldier
    2. Corsair
      Corsair April 22 2014 09: 03
      +2
      Quote: ambiorix
      This is of course very cool, but how many bursts of Kalash or machine gun will all this optics with weapons without armor tower survive?

      But after all ANYWHERE it is not claimed that this is the final version, the production model.
      I am sure that work is underway to increase the security of the object, maneuverability, firepower, etc.
      This is only the first "sprout" ...
  5. rugor
    rugor April 22 2014 08: 34
    0
    strategic missile forces of Russia


    Why rockets?
    1. NOMADE
      NOMADE April 22 2014 08: 43
      +3
      Perhaps it is intended to protect the facilities of the Strategic Missile Forces, in this case, a "unmanned" or a remotely controlled robot "guard", is logically very appropriate.
      1. Lars_xiii
        Lars_xiii April 22 2014 09: 26
        +4
        That's right. This machine was created specifically for the Strategic Missile Forces and precisely as a sentinel. If an adversary or something suspicious is found, it must first call for help. Well, the ability to shoot back is already a nice bonus :)
  6. serega.fedotov
    serega.fedotov April 22 2014 08: 35
    0
    He has more surveillance systems in head watch!
    1. a52333
      a52333 April 22 2014 08: 41
      0
      For a long time there is. [Media = https: //m.youtube.com/watch? V = PqeyAtrGxIw]
  7. Ural guys
    Ural guys April 22 2014 08: 43
    +1
    All this is certainly not bad, but I have one "BUT", who will bring him the ammunition and the cartridges? Or should a soldier carry ammunition under a hail of bullets? And how many soldiers will the company lose while the ammunition is delivered to it?
    Although this is all a theory, maybe he has an automatic feed there, but the resource is still not unlimited.
  8. andj61
    andj61 April 22 2014 08: 44
    0
    Do we need such mechanisms at all? They are expensive, quite vulnerable to saboteurs, operators are still needed ... It’s better to use, in my opinion, either the traditional armored personnel carrier, infantry fighting vehicles, or, since we are talking about strategic missile forces, stationary, remotely controlled cannon-machine gun systems (author. guns - 23 mm caliber, machine guns - 12,5 mm). Simple, reliable, efficient.
    1. Lars_xiii
      Lars_xiii April 22 2014 09: 30
      0
      This system is for mobile complexes. Otherwise, I completely agree.
  9. wizarden
    wizarden April 22 2014 08: 46
    +5
    It's nice to see a real traveling and shooting robot. Although I like the ones I like more :)
    1. Sid.74
      Sid.74 April 22 2014 08: 49
      0
      Quote: wizarden
      It's nice to see a real traveling and shooting robot. Although I like the ones I like more :)

      The video is good, but it hurts the robot is compact for everything that it has inside!
      1. vladsolo56
        vladsolo56 April 22 2014 09: 48
        +2
        It's not even about compactness, if we assume that you can create several different ones on the same base, then anyway, according to the speed characteristics, a car in a cartoon looks somehow cooler. Because there is visible from the video, there is a weak running, weak software and, as a result, a weak interaction between the computer and control systems. In short, everything is very slow. We must strive for the speed of interaction that in the cartoon, in my opinion it is quite possible.
    2. DimychDV
      DimychDV April 22 2014 10: 10
      +1
      And it’s not modeled by Kyev? ..
    3. wizarden
      wizarden April 22 2014 20: 43
      0
      More about this machine.

      http://habrahabr.ru/company/alconost/blog/180793/
  10. Giant thought
    Giant thought April 22 2014 08: 48
    +2
    That's fine. Down and Out trouble started. Technical thought does not stop, we hope that even more ambitious revelations await us.
    1. Orc-xnumx
      Orc-xnumx April 22 2014 08: 58
      0
      I don’t understand what does the Strategic Missile Forces have to do with it?
  11. Voenruk
    Voenruk April 22 2014 08: 49
    0
    Looks like a caricature) Remembering his years in the army, he frankly sneaks into "haha")
  12. Orc-xnumx
    Orc-xnumx April 22 2014 08: 57
    +1
    Well, when will we do the "terminator"?))
  13. DAYMAN
    DAYMAN April 22 2014 08: 58
    +1
    Necessary thing!
  14. Ivan Tucha
    Ivan Tucha April 22 2014 09: 01
    +2
    The era of terminators is just around the corner.
  15. sub307
    sub307 April 22 2014 09: 06
    0
    Well, here ..., therefore, the "iron horse" type has replaced the peasant horse ", we will hit the newest mobile shock-reconnaissance robotic systems off-road ... unparalleled copies.
  16. sazhka4
    sazhka4 April 22 2014 09: 16
    +1
    Thank God. Even though some "news" is not about the outskirts .. They got drunk .. the renegades .. The moment when the "scythe" came across a stone ..
  17. Gagarin
    Gagarin April 22 2014 09: 19
    +2
    VIDEO IN THE COMMENTS SHOWED, THANKS!
  18. Lumumba
    Lumumba April 22 2014 09: 33
    +1
    It is better to use, in my opinion, either the traditional BTR, BMP technique


    And for me, as a father of two children, robots are better than zinc with two hundredths.
  19. Palych9999
    Palych9999 April 22 2014 09: 45
    -1
    Yes ... "Powerful" response of the domestic defense industry to external threats ...
    It resembles a "shoe machine", with the same degree of relevance and effectiveness of purpose.
  20. rubin6286
    rubin6286 April 22 2014 09: 50
    +1
    Science in general and military science, in particular, of course, does not stand still, but “the trouble is that the shoemaker will start to tart pies, and the patty will be the boots”.

    During the years of my cadet youth, I had to get acquainted with some “exotic” projects of strategic missiles and what wasn’t there: a strategic missile “sleeping” at the bottom of the sea until the hour “X”, an air cushion launcher ICBM, a refueling unit with an intricate shape for SRT, individual structural elements of the rocket engine and solid propellant rocket engine, in a word from outright stupidity to clever uselessness.

    Once in the troops, I saw that along with the giant "projections", in some aspects of the operation of rocket technology there is no elementary order, and even, roughly speaking, "the horse didn’t lie", and this sometimes led to death, injuries and injuries of personnel, damage to equipment and property, and was not at all explained as a "violation of safety precautions and technological discipline."

    The idea of ​​a radio-controlled tank, in one form or another, is not new. Let the universities (civilian and military) are engaged in the implementation of such projects commissioned by the Strategic Missile Forces, where, to put it mildly, they understand more about this.

    In my opinion, the Strategic Missile Forces and the East Kazakhstan region missiles should have focused on the operations that the soldier performs directly on the missile system, go from simple to complex and focus on specific issues of operating military and special equipment and equipment in the troops, creating training complexes to ensure trouble-free work of duty shifts, departments and calculations, modern hoisting-and-transport, test-start-up, refueling, technological, auxiliary, equipment, metrological and control-diagnostic support. I can assure readers that there is a wide field for creativity, rationalization and invention.

    Once, S.P. Korolev said that in rocket technology everything should be an order of magnitude higher than in aviation. A lot has been done in this regard, but not everywhere and not in everything.
  21. nelav1951
    nelav1951 April 22 2014 09: 51
    -2
    While it is fantastic and very expensive.
  22. cerbuk6155
    cerbuk6155 April 22 2014 10: 35
    +1
    Great machine design. This is a big breakthrough. The most important thing is not to dwell on this. good good good
  23. mrDimkaP
    mrDimkaP April 22 2014 14: 04
    0
    In my opinion it is better to put only CORD and AGS, but with normal ammunition?

    And of course, great!

    And is it still interesting that its mobility and cross-country ability are sufficient to accompany mobile complexes, even at short intervals of the route? And are you going to use it as a guard, for example, artillery from sabotage groups in hostilities?
    1. wizarden
      wizarden April 22 2014 15: 15
      0
      I think that this model is designed to protect stationary strategic missile forces. Perimeter patrol, long patrol at the right points.
  24. sanek0207
    sanek0207 April 22 2014 14: 38
    0
    Good movie, really liked it.
  25. kelevra
    kelevra April 22 2014 14: 48
    0
    These are not the first steps, and I think not the last, judging by the video, it turns out not bad!
  26. Lumumba
    Lumumba April 22 2014 14: 59
    0
    Big - always starts with small. Glory to the robots!
  27. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 22 2014 15: 01
    0
    The machine is great. Hang a bunch of peepers on it and go. Eh, if I could stir up a sniper system on such a base and with a bigger caliber ...
  28. sv68
    sv68 April 22 2014 16: 50
    0
    I think he needs a robot-slaughtering robot to be set so that the soldiers do not risk it.
    1. wizarden
      wizarden April 23 2014 10: 05
      0
      Quote: sv68
      killing robot

      Maybe a "loader"? :)