British and American rocket artillery WWII

26


Work on the creation of military missiles began in the UK in the late 30s. The British military leadership was focused on traditional means of hitting targets on the battlefield (barrel artillery and aviation) and did not take rockets as serious weapons.

British combat missiles were originally intended solely for firing at aerial targets, when, shortly before the outbreak of war, the need to improve British air defense was realized. The shortage of the required number of anti-aircraft guns, it was decided to compensate for simple and inexpensive missiles.

The first developed 2-inch anti-aircraft missile at launch dragged behind itself a thin steel wire, which was supposed to get entangled in the screws of enemy aircraft, causing, therefore, their fall. There was also an option with 250-gr. fragmentation charge, which had a self-liquidator tuned to 4-5 from flight - by this time the rocket had to reach an estimated height of about 1370 m. .

More promising was the 3-inch anti-aircraft missile, the warhead of which had the same mass as the anti-aircraft 94-mm projectile. The rocket was a simple tubular structure with stabilizers, the engine used a charge of smokeless powder - cordite brand SCRK, already used in the 2-inch rocket. The 25 kg rocket had a ceiling of about 6500 m.

British and American rocket artillery WWII


Missiles and a single shot launcher were successfully tested in the 1939 year. In the same year, the serial production of missiles and launchers was launched.



The launch of missiles from these first installations was not always reliable, and their accuracy was so low that only barrage anti-aircraft fire was possible. Soon, to increase the probability of hitting an air target, a two-track installation was adopted. In the future, increasing the efficiency of anti-aircraft rocket launchers went by increasing the number of missiles on launchers and improving proximity missile fuses.



Mobile installations were made on the carriage of 3-inch anti-aircraft guns, which with 36 rail guides could launch volleys on 9 missiles.

And the most powerful was the stationary coastal defense installation, firing 4 with volleys on 20 missiles, which entered service in the 1944 year.

3-inch missiles proved much more effective as an aircraft weapon. During the war, 3-inch missiles were used from airplanes to combat armored vehicles and even to sink German submarines in surface position.



To some Tanks "Cromwell" were installed on two 3-inch anti-aircraft missiles on rails along the sides of the towers of tanks. There have also been attempts to install such launchers on armored vehicles.



Starting in 1944, the allies began to push the Japanese into Asia. The fights in the jungle were characterized by relatively short distances of fire and often the inability to pull up artillery to destroy the Japanese pillboxes.



To solve this problem, a reactive system was developed, which became known under the code designation LILO.

The launcher was transferred to the firing position by one person, and the second in the backpack carried a rocket. Upon arrival at the site of the rocket was inserted into the front of the pipe, the angle of elevation was regulated by the rear support legs, and the guidance was carried out through an open sight. The launch was carried out remotely using an electric fuse from the battery voltage 3,5 B.



There were two modifications of this weapon: 83-mm - mass 17, 8 kg carried 1,8 kg of explosives, and 152-mm - mass 35 kg carried 6,24 kg of explosives.
LILO was able to enter the ground to a depth of 3 m, also punching a log flooring, which was enough to destroy any Japanese bunker.

The development of jet weapons in the UK was primarily focused on air defense, but on the eve of the inevitable landing of the Allies on the Atlantic coast, it took a light firing means, capable of giving a high density of fire in a short period of time.

Structurally, this was realized by connecting the rocket engine of the 3-inch aircraft missile with the 13-kg warhead of the 127-mm artillery projectile. To improve the accuracy of firing, the rockets twisted at the start with screw guides.



Launchers were installed on landing craft for fire suppression in the landing area. The naval system received the original name "Mattress" ("Mattress").

The land version of this installation was the “Land Mattress” (“Land Mattress”). Army towed PU had a 32 trunk and elevation angle: from 23 ° to 45 °, the maximum firing range to 7225 m.
Later, 24-x lightweight chargers were created. Fire control was carried out using remote control. On the march, the installation was towed by an ordinary army truck.



The first British “Land Mattress” was applied on Sicily in 1943 year. These installations especially distinguished themselves when crossing the Scheldt River and the Walheren storming in 1944, after which several more artillery missile batteries were created.



Installations in significant quantities arrived at the troops only at the beginning of November 1944, so they no longer had a serious influence on the course of the hostilities. Attempts to use the “Land Mattress” in Burma were not very successful, due to low mobility. It was necessary to install on a self-propelled chassis, but the developed launchers on the jeep's chassis were late for the war.

Missiles were used against ground targets naval anti-submarine bomb "Hedgehog", which was developed in the UK and installed on many British and American warships.


bombed "Hedgehog"


The 178-mm projectile with an increased range of fire, upgraded for firing on the coast, contained up to X-NUMX kg of Torpex, which ensured the destruction of any field reinforcement or anti-landing barricade on hit. There was also an incendiary option, which, during the explosion, covered everything within 16 radius with burning white phosphorus.



Bombers with upgraded missiles were used both from amphibious ships to “clean up” the coast, and were installed on Matilda tanks.


"Matilda" armed with anti-submarine bombers - Matilda Hedgehog, is on display in the Australian museum in Puckapunyal. At the stern of the machine is installed bombers Hedgehog.

The Americans began to develop their own missiles almost simultaneously with the British, however, the result was much better. During the war, several different types of 4,5 inch caliber missiles (114 mm) were developed and put into production. The M1943 rocket-projectile with an 8 kg mass, developed from 17,6, became the most popular for arming attack aircraft. It had a length of 911 mm and a caliber 114 mm.


Missile M8


In addition to the US assault aircraft, the M8 projectiles were also actively used by ground forces, mounting multi-launch launchers on tanks, trucks, jeeps and armored personnel carriers, and in the fleet - on ships. Despite the "aviation orientation" of the M8 missiles, the ground forces and the fleet spent several times more of these missiles, using them from multi-barreled multiple rocket launchers.

In 1943, the T27 Xylophone installation is coming into service with the US Army. Installations in a single row were mounted on modified 2,5 t chassis of GMC trucks CCKW-353 6x6 or Studebaker. In terms of accuracy, firing range and volley power, they were inferior to the Soviet BM-13.


American MLRS T27 Xylophone


Also in the US, lighter installations have been developed. The base used modified chassis of all-terrain vehicles such as Willys or Dodge "three-quarters" of WC51.


Install T23


At the rear of the car were installed in two rows of pipes for 28 unguided rockets.

The most famous American MLRS has become T34 CALLIOPE.



The basis for the jet system served as a medium tank МХNUMX "Sherman". The 4 tubular guides for the M60 inch 8 caliber (4,5 mm) missile packs were mounted on its turret. The salvo weight was 114 kg, the maximum firing range was 960 m, and the salvo time was 3800-15 seconds.

The horizontal targeting of the rocket launcher to the target was carried out by the crew commander by turning the turret. Vertical targeting was made by raising or lowering the barrel of the gun, with which a package of guides was connected by means of rigid traction. The total weight of the installation was about 1 t.



Recharging the system on the battlefield was very problematic, and therefore it was simply dropped from the tank immediately after the volley. For this, only one electrical connector was disconnected and three bolts were knocked out with a sledgehammer. In the future, the installation was upgraded and it became possible to get rid of it without leaving the crew out of the tank.



The usual tactic was massive shelling of enemy positions in order to suppress anti-tank weapons from the MLRS fixed on top of the tank turret. After that, the crew quickly got rid of the launcher and went on the attack, along with the usual linear machines. Taking into account the usual "one-time" use of the launcher, later plastic and cardboard guides for missiles were adopted.



There were several versions of these installations, which enjoyed popularity among the troops and were actively used in battles.

Faced with numerous, often highly sophisticated Japanese fortifications and firing points during the battles for the atolls, the Americans quickly created and adopted a single-shot M12 launcher for the 114-mm missiles M8, like the British LILO. Used as plastic, disposable launchers, and reusable magnesium alloy. However, the weight of the warhead of the 114-mm M8 projectile did not exceed 2 kg, and the effectiveness of the installation on protected targets was often not sufficient.

The most “multi-barreled” were the T44 PU with the 120 “pipes”, on the cargo area of ​​the DUKW amphibious truck or the LVT amphibious vehicle and the Scorpion PU with the 144 trunks, based on the DUKW amphibious.

The US Navy and Marines actively used 114-mm projectiles such as 4,5 "BBR - (BBR - Beach Barrage Rocket - a rocket to destroy coastal facilities).


4,5 "BBR missile


The 4,5 "BBR missile had a caliber of 114,3 mm, its length was 760 mm, weight - 13 kg. Powder-propellant charge with a weight of 6,5 kg provided the maximum speed of the projectile 233 m / s, the firing range was about 1 km. The combat part contained 2,9 kg trinitrotoluola. in its action the projectile was comparable to the 105-mm howitzer high-explosive fragmentation projectile.

4,5 "BBR shipboard launchers were packs of cellular guides mounted on the deck of assault landing ships at an angle 45 ° to the horizon. Each of these ships could launch several hundred missiles in a matter of seconds, ensuring the defeat of fortifications and enemy manpower On the coast. In 1942, shipboard launchers were used during the landing of Allied forces in Casablanca, and from 1943, they were widely used in landing operations on Pacific ovah.


Improvised Launcher for 4,5 "BBR Missiles


The first land launchers for launching 4,5 "BBR projectiles" were improvised wooden grooves, which the United States Marines used to conduct a disturbing fire at the positions of the Japanese.


The division of American jet installations 4,5 "BBR on trucks




Also, the simplest launchers were mounted on light all-terrain vehicles, aiming at the target was carried out by means of the corresponding rotation of the car. Fire control was carried out using the remote control.

Absolutely all the 4,5 "BBR missile launchers had a large dispersion when fired and could only be used to attack areas. However, there was no shortage of ammunition for seafarers and marines: during the war years in the United States more than 1 600 000 4,5 rocket shells were produced "BBR.

Despite the fairly widespread use, the available jet ammunition did not satisfy the American military in the accuracy and power of action at the target. In this regard, the Americans moved to the principle of stabilizing the rotation of the missiles.

The 4,5 inch M16 rocket had a length of 787 mm and a mass of 19,3 kg, including 2,16 kg of rocket fuel and 2,36 kg of high-explosive explosive. Its initial speed was 253 m / s, the maximum range of 4805 m. Its stabilization in flight by rotation around the longitudinal axis is provided by a turbine screwed in the bottom of the powder engine, having 8 gas nozzles inclined to the axis of the projectile. The M16 missiles were no longer in service with American aircraft, being purely ground-based for multiple launch rocket systems.


T66 towed launcher


Especially for this missile was developed towed T66 launcher. It consists of 24 aluminum tubular rails, combined in a package, mounted on a two-wheeled carriage with sliding beds.



The vertical plane provides guidance in the range of angles from 0 ° to + 45 °, in the horizontal - within 20 °. Loading launcher was made with the muzzle. Weight launcher without shells - 556 kg. This allowed the use of for transport all-terrain vehicles such as "Willis". Shooting from the installation was carried out using the remote control.



Dispersion of shells was relatively small. For complete equipment installation T66 missiles took about 90 seconds.

The T66 launcher on the totality of characteristics was the most advanced US MLRS used in the Second World War, but it was used only in the final stages of hostilities, and in very small quantities.

In 1943, 182-mm (7,2 inches) unguided missile Ml7, intended primarily for the destruction of long-term defenses, was put into service in the United States. The length of the Ml7 projectile was 880 mm, the total weight - 27,5 kg. During the engine's operation, the projectile accelerated to the speed of 210 m / s, the firing range was approximately 3,2 km.

There was also an improved version of this projectile - M25. He had the head of a different design, the length of the projectile was increased to 1250 mm, the weight was 26 kg. Compared to 114-mm rocket projectiles, the new projectiles had a shorter range and a more powerful high-explosive fragmentation warhead.



The T40 launcher for twenty MNNXX missiles was also mounted on the Sherman, by analogy with the T17 CALLIOPE MLRS.

The installation consisted of 20 honeycomb guides. The rail package itself had armor protection, and in its front part the protection was made in the form of armor flaps that flip up and down.



The T40 launchers were first used in 1944 during the landing of Anglo-American troops in Normandy, and they were used in battles in Northern Italy.

In evaluating the Anglo-American MLRS, it is worth noting that, unlike the USSR and Germany, they were never considered in the armies of the allies as an important means of fire destruction of the enemy. This can be explained by the overwhelming superiority over the German forces in the classical means: barreled artillery and aircraft.

In terms of their combat characteristics, American, and especially British, rocket projectiles were significantly inferior to those used by Soviet and German gunners. This was reflected in the tactics of their use: the British and American MLRSs rarely fired at the enemy’s rear, usually limited to providing direct fire support to their advancing units.

PS The review was compiled at the personal request of Vladimir Glazunov, a resident of the Crimea, an officer of the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations, known on “VO” under the nickname badger1974.

Based on:
http://world-of-kwg.livejournal.com/220800.html
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/
http://epizodsspace.no-ip.org/bibl/shunkov/rak-oruj/02.html
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    April 22 2014 07: 38
    For whom it’s like, but for me it’s a discovery that the allies of the Second World War also used reactive systems, before that I thought that there were only Katyusha!)
    1. +3
      April 22 2014 09: 16
      This begs an article about the reactive systems of the Axis countries besides Germany, if they were also Japan during the WWII.
      1. badger1974
        +6
        April 22 2014 10: 47
        easily, the most Japanese RS, and with a specific task
        1. +3
          April 22 2014 17: 29
          easily, the most Japanese RS, and with a specific task

          do you want to participate in the guidance head?
          1. badger1974
            +3
            April 23 2014 18: 49
            you won’t believe it, but I’ve already been kamikaze for 20 years
            1. Alf
              0
              April 26 2014 22: 56
              Of course, I apologize, but .. Why do you need this? Have you really decided to start production of MLRS in your garage?
            2. 0
              12 May 2014 00: 22
              Well, yes, you have the right to radicals all as one kamikaze:
      2. +7
        April 22 2014 10: 50
        Japan MLRS, in the full sense of the word, at that time was not.
        There was a type 4 installation, launching ninety-kilogram fools as much as 800 meters.
        1. badger1974
          +3
          April 22 2014 11: 15
          the Japanese gravitated more toward the jungle, indochina rummaging around and exotic islands to roll up, and the continental Kwaktun army received nothing but hordes of mosquitoes in Mangolia from the emperor, and indeed they didn’t want anything at all, everything went like a break in the fleet, by the way, to no avail, which x MLRS? Japan is the most saddle of the 40s of the 20th century in the person of the 21st century kiwi
      3. +8
        April 22 2014 11: 27
        Quote: Civil
        This begs an article about the reactive systems of the Axis countries besides Germany, if they were also Japan during the WWII.

        There is nothing special to write about Japan, during the Second World War, the imperial army was armed with only a single-shot 200-mm type 4 installation, with a firing range of about 2500 m and a rate of 3 rds / min. Projectile weight about 96 kg.
    2. 0
      April 22 2014 18: 18
      Quote: Cosmos1987
      before that I thought that there were only Katyusha!)


      In addition to the Katyusha, the Red Army also had Andryusha salvo mortars, they especially proved themselves at the Kursk Bulge.
  2. Voenruk
    +3
    April 22 2014 08: 56
    That they started in the 30s, they can’t even believe it.
    1. badger1974
      +3
      April 22 2014 10: 35
      yes you are stunned when you find out what the Chinese did with rockets 1000 years ago
  3. badger1974
    +6
    April 22 2014 08: 59
    Thank you Seryoga, but I am not an officer, but a senior warrant officer of the internal service of the Ministry of Emergencies of Russia, as always, there are no comments on the article, there are only additions and reasoning, for example, I discovered for myself that the Land Mattress and Hedgehog RSs are strikingly similar to the PIAT grenade launcher shot, along the way, Tommy did not bother too much with the search for the design of an "idial" RS, and it is rather strange that the states in their "conquistador" campaigns of the 20th century rather late appreciated the usefulness of MLRS
    1. +5
      April 22 2014 11: 20
      Volodya, glad you liked it! You asked, I did wink
      I was not in the know about your rank, I just knew that you wear epaulettes.
      1. badger1974
        +3
        April 22 2014 12: 10
        about the title is not a question, but many thanks for the article, and this is what a discovery for me, RS 4,5 "BBR 114 mm in a triple launcher were also on the US hawks P-47 thunderbolt and on the P-53 mustang
  4. +5
    April 22 2014 11: 22
    Quote: Civil
    This begs an article about the reactive systems of the Axis countries besides Germany, if they were also Japan during the WWII.

    I support! Respect to the author for the series of articles!
  5. +7
    April 22 2014 11: 58
    Very informative material. Thanks to the author.
  6. +5
    April 22 2014 12: 47
    Thank you especially for the British. The American MLRS was not news to me, but I was not interested in the British as a whole. As a matter of habit, I thought that they received everything from the states.
  7. +4
    April 22 2014 13: 13
    Quote: badger1974
    RS 4,5 "BBR 114 mm in a triple launcher were also on the US P-47 thunderbolt hawks and on the P-53 Mustang.

    Volodya, you're wrong 4,5 "BBR 114mmis a purely naval system, with a rather low ballistics. American fighters used 114-mm rockets M8 in tubular guides.
    1. badger1974
      +3
      April 22 2014 13: 31
      Yes, just a photo came up with thoughts built PU
      1. +6
        April 22 2014 13: 50
        This is a late version of the MLRS T34 CALLIOPE under 114 mm M8It is possible that aviation disposable PUs have been used.
        In general, in the United States there were three different types of shells of this caliber: M8, M16 and 4,5 "BBR. The latter most likely leads its family tree from jet bombs
        1. badger1974
          +2
          April 22 2014 14: 41
          just built mine attracted attention, there are pictures of the tander, but they are not clear, it is impossible to determine, but the fact that they were is a fact, ATP for clarification, and to the topic of the same air, hydra state identity along the way from I quote your text- "reactive shells of 4,5 inches (114 mm). The most widespread was the M1943 rocket projectile with a mass of 8 kg, developed for arming attack aircraft and produced since 17,6, it had a length of 911 mm and a caliber of 114 mm. "- but reduced to 70 mm to reduce aerodynamic loads, in this state it has reached our days, but they say that we are anachronistic
  8. +6
    April 22 2014 15: 20
    Thank you very much to the author for the article! Earlier I thought that I knew enough about the MLRS of the USA and Great Britain from the time of 2MV, but it turned out that it was not enough.
  9. 0
    April 22 2014 15: 35
    I don’t understand, in recent photos, how mattresses climbed into the tower?
  10. +1
    April 22 2014 21: 12
    And I read that during the Korean War, the most effective were German rocket launchers - accurate, mobile, compact, good for the jungle. http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/199/rduz358.jpeg
    1. badger1974
      +3
      April 22 2014 21: 44
      about the jungle in vain, Korea, in general, the steppe zone with slopes, about the jungle you got two parallels to the equator
  11. +5
    April 24 2014 14: 32
    Quote: DC 3
    I didn’t know this, since I had never seen it in photographs

    Such installations for the 82-mm RS were used in battles in the Caucasus.
  12. Alf
    +5
    April 26 2014 23: 05
    During the Vietnam War, the Vietnamese side was ordered to install Grad without trucks. Ours was at first guarded ... from such an avant-garde, but the narrow-eyed friends explained what was the matter.
    There was such a bike (moreover, similar to the truth) that one Amer airport was fired from Grad, and the terrain for trucks was absolutely impassable. Then it turned out that 2-3 Chinese people carry each barrel of the Castle. They collect it on the spot, give a volley and, while the adversary is recovering, take it apart voluntarily and dump it.
  13. 52
    +3
    April 27 2014 12: 26
    Thank you so much for the series of articles! I was especially pleased with the part about the English PCs - I found out that I didn't really know anything about them. Definitely "+" for broadening one's horizons.
    1. +1
      12 May 2014 00: 38
      It seems that the allied troops had an unambiguously overbalance with the NURS. I argue - excellent RIAT, "Bazookas", rocket-propelled bombs (we had it crushed in the bud) and against this background, exoocyses with a bomb-launcher - Stokes' mortar (which everyone sold into metal), early fur. SRZO, semi-unnecessary and not very much getting NURS "Kharikeynov". And in the article itself, many samples of SRZO are shown, in general exotic! One gets the impression that in some places the US command simply did not know: - "where are we to stick these rackets and on the fig, do we need them?" PS: I was pleased with the description of the towed SRZO, the French and the Germans later had such, in NATO, and the description of the modifications of the T37 "Kaliope" - this can be said to be the daddy of the TOS-1 "Buratino"
  14. +7
    April 27 2014 13: 25
    Quote: Alf
    Then it turned out that each trunk of the Castle was carried by an 2-3 Chinese. They were assembled on the spot, fired and, while the adversary was recovering, they were taken apart and dumped randomly.

    You are exaggerating a little, the installation-9P132 "Grad-P" ("Partizan") was used in V'Tnam. It was originally single-shot and was not going to be packaged. Launcher "Grad-P" is a tubular guide. To give rotation to the projectile, there is a U-shaped groove on the guide. The pipe is mounted on a tripod with a guidance mechanism. It used a special shortened projectile 9M22M "Kid". The shells themselves are also collapsible and consist of two parts. The warhead is completely borrowed from the M-21OF projectile.
    1. Alf
      0
      4 May 2014 21: 51
      It is possible, but the essence of this does not change - the use of the installation where it is even theoretically impossible.
  15. 0
    12 May 2014 00: 26
    Quote: Alf
    During the Vietnam War, the Vietnamese side was ordered to install Grad without trucks. Ours was at first guarded ... from such an avant-garde, but the narrow-eyed friends explained what was the matter.
    There was such a bike (moreover, similar to the truth) that one Amer airport was fired from Grad, and the terrain for trucks was absolutely impassable. Then it turned out that 2-3 Chinese people carry each barrel of the Castle. They collect it on the spot, give a volley and, while the adversary is recovering, take it apart voluntarily and dump it.

    Well, let's not forget the sepoy uprising in India, then the British troops were just as well ... if they fired on them from impenetrable jungle. And from there, General Kongrev (as I spell, I could be wrong), and brought to Europe weapons already forgotten after the burning of Russian cities and Ryazan. The little Englishmen burned Copenhagen with rockets, then what's so surprising .-)
  16. 0
    13 May 2014 00: 46
    Informative.
  17. 0
    22 September 2014 13: 11
    What the hell, half-tank half-RZSO, here is our BM-12, a hundred times cooler.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"