The lessons of "modern" diplomacy for Russia on the Ukrainian example
Any negotiations concerning the post-Soviet space are in the key when creating the greenhouse conditions for the expansion of NATO, US interests to the east, and the agreements signed during their negotiations are absolutely nothing on the agenda. This is a simple formula that has worked twice in Ukraine alone over the past two months. The first time was when President Viktor Yanukovych in the presence of three ministers- "guarantors" of the EU countries at once signed the so-called February agreements. As you know, right after Yanukovych put his signature on the document, and the hottest phase began on the Maidan, which ended with a coup d'état.
The second time - last week - when the Quartet gathered in Geneva, discussed ways of resolving the situation, agreed that the squares and streets of the cities of Ukraine should be liberated, and unconstitutional armed formations should be disarmed.
Immediately after the meeting of the Quartet (Russia, the USA, the EU and Ukraine), the armed forces (pravoseki and other national guardsmen) explicitly assassinated Kiev, which in turn advised overseas “partners” (the visit of the CIA director Brennan did not go unnoticed) decided to disarm whether the formation of the southeast. At the same time, of course, having forgotten that the document also implies their (associates) disarmament, too. We checked it once ... We checked it a second time ... The result was blood: the dead and wounded in Slavyansk, a new escalation in the whole Donbas, in other regions of the south and south-east of Ukraine. Apparently, having signed those same Geneva agreements, Kiev decided that now it was people in jeeps, with machine guns, noise and not only noise grants, who received a mandate to “inspect” the southeast. And the OSCE does not count ...
And when the OSCE is not counted, an episode from a recent storieswhen the “missionaries” of this organization, who arrived as observers of the elections in the USA, were not even allowed to go to the polling stations. Today’s handwriting in Ukraine is very similar, although there is still more than a month before the elections. Whose hand still writes? ..
The “official” Kiev, his puppeteers from the West, were initially invited to Geneva as a kind of holy fool, through which it would be possible to conduct precisely the policy of interest to the United States. Kiev so made a fool and made. As soon as the information about the agreement was circulated through news agencies, the Ukrainian “authorities” began to issue such comments to the Geneva accords that it seemed that these people were just raving. The Ukrainian Foreign Minister, who was present in Geneva (he calls himself that way; the minister says I) Andrei Deshchytsa said that all squares and streets should be vacated except for the Kiev Maidan, because the Maidan is occupied by people on certain legal grounds ... Ms. Tymoshenko (the leader of the “Batkivschyna”) and issued at all that in Geneva it was decided to withdraw Russian troops from the east of Ukraine. Truly holy fools. Such as the West needs at this particular moment in Ukraine, but only at this particular moment ... Then, there is an opinion, cleansing is expected ... At least the prerequisites of these “purges”, more precisely - episodes of selective political filtering, manifest themselves now: right away several congressmen whom Tymoshenko’s candidate planned to meet during her trip to the States did not confirm their agreement to such a meeting. Filter - failed ...
So, what happens? And it turns out that participation in any agreements with the West on issues of today's Ukraine is nothing more than participation. The West clearly demonstrates that it is ready to multiply by zero absolutely any agreement in which there is even a hint of taking into account the interests of anyone other than the West itself. It was clear to write down the southeastern agreement to the Geneva Agreement, Russian troops take the Kiev bad "power" out of the Urals - to recognize, "it was impossible, but apparently the West scrolled this thought hundreds of times in its cranial box , even before signing the agreements, he convinced himself that it was precisely this that he was able to achieve in Geneva from Russia. Once again, a variant of political self-hypnosis has been triggered, which is also going to be extrapolated to other countries and territories, when the desired is more than frankly passed off as real.
What should Russia do now, if new “Geneva” and others like it will be announced for the near future with the participation of the delegation of the Russian Federation. Refuse to participate at all? No, you can not refuse now. After all, it is not unusual for Russia to expect precisely self-exclusion from the discussion, so that later through the world media it will trumpet what Russia is supposedly wild and boil in its own juice. We all understand that there really is no discussion, that “discussion” is only a beautiful cover for those decisions that are being pushed through by “partners”, but at the same time,. if we begin to understand this, then it is impossible not to take advantage of it. As an option - to gather, “debate”, “negotiate”, but at the same time, calmly (as the West itself teaches) to bend its line, using the possibilities of the media, public platforms and institutions to demonstrate this line, to promote its interests.
At the same time, it is necessary to stop rounding our eyes in cases where our interests are trying, as already said, to multiply by zero, to push into the background. You just need to get used to it (and Russia seems to be getting used to it), and gently - by the corner of your foot, looking at the sky and whistling a light melody - moving this most West-prepared zero towards its own (Western) interests. This method of modern “diplomacy” that “partners” are trying to implement in our respect should be used. If this is a “diplomatic” lesson in the understanding of the United States for Russia, then American “friends” should not forget that we learn the lessons, draw conclusions ...
The second time - last week - when the Quartet gathered in Geneva, discussed ways of resolving the situation, agreed that the squares and streets of the cities of Ukraine should be liberated, and unconstitutional armed formations should be disarmed.
Immediately after the meeting of the Quartet (Russia, the USA, the EU and Ukraine), the armed forces (pravoseki and other national guardsmen) explicitly assassinated Kiev, which in turn advised overseas “partners” (the visit of the CIA director Brennan did not go unnoticed) decided to disarm whether the formation of the southeast. At the same time, of course, having forgotten that the document also implies their (associates) disarmament, too. We checked it once ... We checked it a second time ... The result was blood: the dead and wounded in Slavyansk, a new escalation in the whole Donbas, in other regions of the south and south-east of Ukraine. Apparently, having signed those same Geneva agreements, Kiev decided that now it was people in jeeps, with machine guns, noise and not only noise grants, who received a mandate to “inspect” the southeast. And the OSCE does not count ...
And when the OSCE is not counted, an episode from a recent storieswhen the “missionaries” of this organization, who arrived as observers of the elections in the USA, were not even allowed to go to the polling stations. Today’s handwriting in Ukraine is very similar, although there is still more than a month before the elections. Whose hand still writes? ..
The “official” Kiev, his puppeteers from the West, were initially invited to Geneva as a kind of holy fool, through which it would be possible to conduct precisely the policy of interest to the United States. Kiev so made a fool and made. As soon as the information about the agreement was circulated through news agencies, the Ukrainian “authorities” began to issue such comments to the Geneva accords that it seemed that these people were just raving. The Ukrainian Foreign Minister, who was present in Geneva (he calls himself that way; the minister says I) Andrei Deshchytsa said that all squares and streets should be vacated except for the Kiev Maidan, because the Maidan is occupied by people on certain legal grounds ... Ms. Tymoshenko (the leader of the “Batkivschyna”) and issued at all that in Geneva it was decided to withdraw Russian troops from the east of Ukraine. Truly holy fools. Such as the West needs at this particular moment in Ukraine, but only at this particular moment ... Then, there is an opinion, cleansing is expected ... At least the prerequisites of these “purges”, more precisely - episodes of selective political filtering, manifest themselves now: right away several congressmen whom Tymoshenko’s candidate planned to meet during her trip to the States did not confirm their agreement to such a meeting. Filter - failed ...
So, what happens? And it turns out that participation in any agreements with the West on issues of today's Ukraine is nothing more than participation. The West clearly demonstrates that it is ready to multiply by zero absolutely any agreement in which there is even a hint of taking into account the interests of anyone other than the West itself. It was clear to write down the southeastern agreement to the Geneva Agreement, Russian troops take the Kiev bad "power" out of the Urals - to recognize, "it was impossible, but apparently the West scrolled this thought hundreds of times in its cranial box , even before signing the agreements, he convinced himself that it was precisely this that he was able to achieve in Geneva from Russia. Once again, a variant of political self-hypnosis has been triggered, which is also going to be extrapolated to other countries and territories, when the desired is more than frankly passed off as real.
What should Russia do now, if new “Geneva” and others like it will be announced for the near future with the participation of the delegation of the Russian Federation. Refuse to participate at all? No, you can not refuse now. After all, it is not unusual for Russia to expect precisely self-exclusion from the discussion, so that later through the world media it will trumpet what Russia is supposedly wild and boil in its own juice. We all understand that there really is no discussion, that “discussion” is only a beautiful cover for those decisions that are being pushed through by “partners”, but at the same time,. if we begin to understand this, then it is impossible not to take advantage of it. As an option - to gather, “debate”, “negotiate”, but at the same time, calmly (as the West itself teaches) to bend its line, using the possibilities of the media, public platforms and institutions to demonstrate this line, to promote its interests.
At the same time, it is necessary to stop rounding our eyes in cases where our interests are trying, as already said, to multiply by zero, to push into the background. You just need to get used to it (and Russia seems to be getting used to it), and gently - by the corner of your foot, looking at the sky and whistling a light melody - moving this most West-prepared zero towards its own (Western) interests. This method of modern “diplomacy” that “partners” are trying to implement in our respect should be used. If this is a “diplomatic” lesson in the understanding of the United States for Russia, then American “friends” should not forget that we learn the lessons, draw conclusions ...
Information