Ivan Okhlobystin: On the right of the Colt

21 636 8
"God created people, and Colonel Colt equated them with rights"

At one time, I was filling up with all sorts of shooting glands, and therefore catch me in a romantic attachment to arms no way. What, however, does not affect my desire to at least partially control the situation. Otherwise it does not work: I have children, I am a citizen and a believer. If I understand that the only way to save a child from Evsyukov’s bullet is to take his brain out of the TT, I should be able to do it. I firmly realize that I will immediately appear before a criminal, civil and, most importantly, ecclesiastical court, but the child must survive.

I allowed myself this emotional preamble to draw your attention to the outright sabotage by people's representatives of the question of the right of their voters to defend themselves, the right of citizens to have a normal automatic weapon. One gets the feeling that the deputies are afraid of a fair reprisal of themselves or consider their own voters uncontrollable scum, devoid of any norms of morality and ethics. If this is so, then our civic duty is to warn higher organizations about the internal enemy in the State Duma. If the higher organizations do not pay due attention to this, then it should be reasonable to assume that the President is in danger and to resolve this issue independently.

Frequent mention in the press of "crazed" owners of traumatic weapons. It is clear to the Samarkand donkey that “here it is like this” does not happen, as it used to be the same before, but the press was less interested. Why did feathers suddenly get alarmed? Al informational reasons a little? Or "from above" ordered to punch? Prepare to tighten supervision and issuance of traumatic and smooth-bore? It may be right, but the people around me for the most part have such a weapon for many years and do not indulge. Someone saved the life of a weapon, someone with a weapon twice after buying into a tin can at a dump shot. But so that with dope ... Dismiss!

It is not necessary to tighten anything, it is necessary to facilitate, as in 100, so adored by the liberals of the United States years ago. Only it is necessary to start the whole procedure of registration through the military registration and enlistment offices. At the same time, and with the combat reserve statistics will be clarified. Russia-your mother defended? Get the paper. Go to the store and buy "Kalash with two zinc" legally.

With regards to the madmen and "Batman," putin "enchanted," it is as a force of nature. Silver-encrusted collection browning for ugliness is usually not required. The most terrible weapon is a piece of glass in a drunken brawl, and of course a kitchen knife, of course, for a homemade “dismemberment”.

And in fact, in this regard, I see one conclusion: people are disarmed - see, default is on the way, fear is “up above”, ferments, “who is for Putin, who is for Medvedev?” And other ambiguities.

As a staunch "sovereign", I personally do not see much difference, but with the stubbornness of an idiot I continue to insist on my right to be able to protect a family with a smart weapon in their hands during a hypothetical unrest.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -7
    14 June 2010 16: 06
    Personally, I do not smile to be shot by some silly person. Is he going to jail and my family?
    So it is impossible to distribute weapons. Not the wild West.
  2. Sasha
    +12
    24 September 2010 09: 56
    Nerds already have weapons. It’s time to get decent people. Ivan says the case.
  3. Alexander
    Alexander
    +1
    April 10 2011 04: 37
    The deputy shot the schoolboy for a snowball

    A deputy of the City Council of Khakassia shot the child for playing snowballs. This outrageous incident has already received wide resonance in society.
    The tragedy almost happened in the city of Chernogorsk. An 11-year-old student played with snowballs with his friends when an MP passed by. One of the lumps of snow hit him, in response to which the man took out a gun and shot at the child.

    As a result of the incident, the student was injured in the leg. A criminal case has been instituted against the deputy who used to work as a teacher - he himself appeared to the police with confession.
  4. +2
    15 September 2011 15: 57
    It is not necessary to tighten anything, it is necessary to facilitate, as in 100, so adored by the liberals of the United States years ago. Only it is necessary to start the whole procedure of registration through the military registration and enlistment offices. At the same time, and with the combat reserve statistics will be clarified. Russia-your mother defended? Get the paper. Go to the store and buy "Kalash with two zinc" legally.

    This is a very correct article, especially if you happen to arrive already with your weapon, which you know far and wide ...
  5. +8
    30 October 2011 18: 32
    Okhlobystin gets 5+, because it is precisely those who have weapons and security (fucking elected representatives) who are against the idea that an ordinary citizen could protect himself from criminals, punks and just drug addicts. The current political order is to de-credit the very idea of ​​owning a weapon and our "democratic" media happily savor every fact of the use of a non-lethal weapon. At the same time, I have never seen publications or news stories that say: "Mr. Ivanov fired a clip of a non-lethal weapon at Mr. Mamedov, thereby saving the life and health of himself, his relatives and just random passers-by...", and there are countless such cases. It's just that our "elected representatives" and the elected representatives of the people are AFRAID of people with weapons. Because people with weapons are not sheep. Of course, you can't give a gun to just anyone, but forgive me if a person served in the army, where he was given a gun, moreover, he defended the integrity of the Russian state with this gun, and as a civilian he can't buy a rifled IZH, this is somehow illogical. Given that there is no law (normal law) for owners of even a smoothbore. You can shoot a potential killer only when he starts cutting you, and before that you need to keep the gun in your own house in a safe with an unloaded magazine.
    .In general, I don't think that our discussion will somehow influence the decision that has already been made - in no case to allow ordinary people to defend themselves and their loved ones, but it is nice that there are normal people in our show elite. I don't want to offend anyone, but Ivan is more an exception than a rule.
  6. +6
    13 May 2014 01: 26
    Heh better still have a weapon than not have.
  7. 0
    20 January 2019 00: 49
    The people have been given the right to vote - to elect and be elected. Restrictions are spelled out in the law, "Suffrage," - something like that is called. The president, governors, mayors, deputies - are selected. Do you want to vote laughing - you want to get out yourself wassat . The President is the commander in chief of the Russian army, he is given a “nuclear suitcase” soldier . We are not even allowed to PM, IZH-17, Nagan ... March 15, 1990 elected Gorbachev - entrusted him with the state - what happened everyone knows. Probably didn’t check any help am Trust the people to choose and be elected - formally trust the people to govern the state lol . Short weapons - through a bunch of references and a lot of checks - do not trust stop . Grown to the right to vote - grown to the short-trunk good . USA is not Wild West for a long time - weapons are still being sold bully . terrorists already use knives - kitchen knives. Can ban kitchen knives just in case? A boy of 18 years old is given a machine gun and sent to war - you can. Adult man PM, IL-17 - not allowed, not mature? fool
  8. 0
    14 September 2021 09: 02
    eleven years have passed ...