The “Ukrainian revolution” clearly showed how millions of people can be turned into “new barbarians” (“ukrov-ukraintsy”). These people live in a fictional world, with a completely fictional and mythologized history, corrected by political geography, and speak an artificial language.
Thanks to the twenty-three year-old triumph of “Ukrainians,” millions of people have lost all spiritual, intellectual, cultural and national orientation. If you follow the reports of the Ukrainian media, you will get the impression: there was a psychiatric "apocalypse" in Ukraine. The logic of the judgments of conscious "Ukrainians" (trapped in the networks of the Morocc Rus) is hopelessly broken, and the lack of full-fledged, complex knowledge is compensated by a collection of some wild fantasies and ideas. At the same time, the unshakable self-righteousness stands out in the painful state of the “Ukrainians”.
Already two generations of people have grown up who do not know any homeland except Ukraine. Their worldview and worldview is formed in independent schools. And if before the Russian people in schools studied in their native language, while remaining involved in the Russian world, now schools in Ukrainian completely dominate. In the west, they have already been brought to almost 100%, in the center of them, on average, to 70%, and in the east there are already more than half. The reprogramming of Russians (Rus), who are being transformed into the fictional "Ukrainian people", is proceeding at a rapid pace. Today, Russian parents send their children to school, and at the exit, especially if they have no time to engage in the self-education of children (and there are a great majority of such people), there is already a cultural and linguistic “blank”, “Ukrainian”. The press, TV and the surrounding reality (the dominance of the Ukrainian pseudo-language in state, educational, cultural institutions, etc.), especially given the sharply tightened censorship, which blocks access to the Russian media, completes the process of creating a "new matrix". Moreover, this “matrix” is extremely aggressive, illiterate and flawed. Its main goal is the narrowing of Russian space, the collision of one part of the Russo superethnos with another.
In Ukrainian schools, children are taught “Ukrainian history” (almost completely falsified and mythologized project) in Ukrainian textbooks and in Ukrainian. Many citizens of Russia were surprised when in recent months a wave of hatred, cave Nazism and Russophobia fell on them from Ukraine. Many still lived in the cultural and educational space of the USSR, they believed that the Russian Federation and Ukraine are now different states, but the peoples inhabiting them are still “fraternal”. However, the myth of the "two brotherly nations" (Russians and Ukrainians) was brutally destroyed. First, there are no two "fraternal peoples". There are Russes (Russians) who realize themselves as Russians and consider the Soviet Union, the Russian Empire, the Russian kingdom, Vladimir-Moscow Russia, the Old Russian state (Novgorod and Kiev Russia) Russian states. And there are Ruses who are deceived, “zombied”, turned into “Ukrainians” and “Russian cultural”, who have not yet become “Ukrainians”, but do not even realize themselves completely Russian.
Secondly, there is no “brotherhood” and there can be no. The project "Ukraine" was originally designed in the West in order to weaken the Russian civilization, to break away from it an extensive piece, making it "Nerusya" ("Non-Russian"). The basis of this project is hate and destruction. If you take the images of the “Lord of the Rings” by Tolkien, then the “Ukrainians” are a kind of spoiled elves (rus). They fell under the power of the enemy (the Catholic and Russophobic Rzecz Pospolita, then Austria-Hungary), they were mocked at them for centuries, killed the best representatives, grew up a layer of “national traitors”. The enemy also created the “language of the orcs” (the Ukrainian language) - a distorted Russian language, into which Polish borrowings were consistently introduced, simplified and alter the words.
There can be no “brotherhood” between Ukraine and Russia. It is necessary to clearly realize that “Ukraine” (“Outskirts”, one of the outskirts of Russian civilization) is Small Russia, temporarily occupied by the enemy. The enemy captured the Russian lands, including the ancient Kiev, planted their Gauleiter governors, gave all the power to the "national traitors" caste, the degenerate "ukrov" caste. And the rest of the Russians have been brainwashed for a long time and fairly successfully, forming a “Ukrainian identity”. Therefore, sooner or later we will return the West Russian lands, we will restore the integrity of the Russian civilization and the super-ethnos of the Rus. "National traitors" will have to leave the Russian lands, having gone to their Western masters, or to undergo a course of re-education.
Therefore, it is not worth surprising the crowds of Svidomo madmen, who at first demanded "European integration", and then switched to the massacre of their own corrupt and artificial statehood. Most of these people (on the Maidan prevailed young people) were released from independent schools. This led to the coming to power of the current Ukrainian politicians who are puppets of the West and the local oligarchy. And now Ukraine is also rolling back to neo-feudalism, when the power is seized by large feudal lords - oligarchs, and their directors (majordoms).
It is clear that in order to retain power in such a state, it is necessary to constantly work to destroy historical memory and the ability to think logically. Illiteracy and intellectual degradation are consciously cultivated. Even politically inactive people who are indifferent to politics, history and geography, still get some ideas about the world around them. Any Losers or dummy talker from Russia still know some scraps from the school program. That Ivan the Terrible took Kazan, Peter the Great shaved beards to the boyars and built Petersburg, the Russians defeated the Ottomans, the French and the Germans, etc.
However, schoolchildren in Ukraine endure completely different knowledge from educational institutions. As a result, they have a wild kaleidoscope in their heads: from the “ancient ukrov”, who fought with ancient Rome, and the “battle hopak”; the Russian ethnos, which was formed on the territory of the Golden Horde, is the genetic continuation of the Horde, when the Russians are a mixture of Finno-Ugric and Türks (Mongols) with a small infusion of Slavs; the constant pressure of Muscovy, which gradually "occupied" Ukraine; The “heroic struggle” of the Ukrainian people for liberation from the “colonial oppression of the Muscovites”; victories in 1991; "Heroic" fighters of the SS division "Galicia", etc.
This wild kaleidoscope of historical events, black myths, dirty gossip and frank deception is created by especially active individuals whose brain is hopelessly affected by “Ukrainians,” or unprincipled politicians, publicists and scientists deliberately deceiving people, receiving some material benefits from it. The created historical myths penetrate into scientific and artistic books, textbooks, articles, become an integral part of the information and cultural field of the country. They are imposed on children and adolescents, whose weak consciousness is most vulnerable to delirium.
It is clear that school history is inevitably state propaganda, which forms the fundamental historical myths that hold the whole state. However, these myths are usually based on real events, which somewhat embellish, omit sick questions and topics, etc. In the Ukrainian case, this degree is completely divorced from reality, turned into “historical fiction” (alternative history), and with extremely Russophobic overtones . Preparation Russophobes put on stream. The current effectiveness of propaganda is so powerful that in a few more years it is possible to almost completely “Ukrainize” the center of present-day Ukraine and to achieve predominance in the southeast. After that, the "Ukrainian Reich" can be thrown against Russia. It’s impossible to wait until everything “stabilizes”. A strategy and practical actions are needed to restore the “Russianness” of Little Russia.
In general, the entire current “historiography” of today's Ukraine can be divided into two categories. “Moderate”, which is based on the legacy of Mikhail Hrushevsky (1866 — 1934) and his followers. This concept began the offensive even at the time of the decline of the Russian Empire and during the USSR, but then it was done carefully. Hrushevsky in his time created the 10-volume monograph "History of Ukraine-Rus", which laid the foundations of the modern Ukrainian historical school. Grushevsky tried to bring the history of the Ukrainian people to the era of Kievan Rus (“the Ukrainian state”) and even to the previous period. He promoted the separate ethnogenesis and the difference between the Ukrainian and Russian peoples. Grushevsky's followers are based on a standard set of historical facts, but attach quotations of various sources to them, their fragments, trying to bring the real story under their ideas. An illusion of science is being created. “Ukrainizers” are trying to prove that Kievan Rus was the cradle of Ukraine and the Ukrainian people, and the Russian people was formed much later - on the basis of Vladimir-Suzdal Russia. According to their concept, Russians and Ukrainians are different nations. Moreover, the Finno-Ugric peoples and the Turks had a great influence on the ethnogenesis of Russians. Not every reader, especially children and young people, has a large knowledge base to recognize deception in the general outline of seemingly true facts, and as a result, many become victims of deception.
The second category of Ukrainian “historiography” is more or less skillful and generally crazy fantasy. Here, publicists and “historians” (like Valery Bebik, Doctor of Political Sciences) mold the history of “Great Ukraine” just on the knee. Claims on the scientific virtually no. But the scope of fantasy and the “heroization” of the history of the “Ukrainian people” is simply amazing by its delusional nature. However, among the illiterate, who have lost the remnants of the logic of the “new barbarians” this causes delight and awe. The main emphasis is on emotions. The antiquity and majesty of "Nenka", which went from the ancient Scythians, the Aryans, and even the Hyperboreans with the Atlanteans, gradually replaces other historical concepts.
For historians and people who are well acquainted with history, such “works” can only cause a grin. But for the semi-literate “new barbarians” and the Ukrainian “intelligentsia”, preoccupied with the search for “Ukrainian greatness”, they become almost a religious revelation.
A similar picture could be observed in the first half of the 20th century in Germany. When various clubs, researchers and orders searched for the roots of the Aryan (German) people in Atlantis, Tula (the legendary island in the north of Europe), Shambhala, etc. As a result, really great German history and culture were trying to bind to the mythical period of human existence. The Germans were declared the direct descendants of the Aryans, the "chosen people." In Ukraine, there is a similar situation. Only here the situation is somewhat different. “Great Ukraine” is generally created from scratch, from emptiness. "Ukraine" as a state, and not the "outskirts" of Russia and "Little Russia" (part of united Russia), did not exist in antiquity. For the first time "Ukrainian statehood" was established in Soviet Russia - the Ukrainian SSR appeared. And it was a purely political decision that had no ethnic basis. In antiquity there was no “ukrov-ukraintsy”. All sources, both Russian and foreign (Western European, Byzantine, Persian and Arabic) tell us about Russia, Russian Land, Rus, Dew, Rusyns, Russian Law, Russian Princes . But there is not a word about "Ukraine" and "Ukrainians."
There were no “Ukrainians” and in the lands seized by the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Poland, they were inhabited by Russians (Ruses). Only in the XIX century, a small group of intellectuals created a theory about the existence of "the three branches of the Russian people" (Great Russians, Little Russians and Belarusians). In Soviet Russia, these three branches were generally declared independent peoples (admittedly, "brotherly"). Although nothing has changed, the Russians still lived in Moscow, Khabarovsk, Kiev and Minsk. No mass migrations of some "Ukrainians" to the lands of "Little Russia" were recorded.
In the 19th century, other “branches of the Russian people” could be created in the same way, and then declare them “independent East Slavic peoples”. So, both Novgorod, and Ryazan, and tverichi, and Siberians, and Pomors, and Terek Cossacks, and many other territorial groups of the Superannos of the Rus, then had quite significant local features. Features were in the dialect, life, clothing, etc. If desired, and purposeful work could create dozens of "new nations." It was possible to write and "their" history of each region, focusing on the "enslavement" of Moscow.
An interesting fact is that in such pseudo-historical research in Ukraine, as in many other things, there is no originality. The Ukrainian pseudo-intelligentsia simply took over the developments of the Polish pancy. Ukrainian “researchers”, in fact, simply repeated and developed the ancient tales of the Pole-Russophobe Frantisek Duchinsky (1817-1893). It was he who first spoke about the “stolen Russian name,” establishing that the “Ukrainians” are in fact true Russians (Ruska), and the Russians are not Russians, but “Moskali-Asians”. According to this theory, before Peter I, all Russians were called “Muscovites” and were descended from Finno-Finns and Mongols. Russia was also called "Muscovy". And the Russians of Kievan Rus, like true Slavs and Aryans, were forced to give up their name and call themselves “Ukrainians” in order to differ from the “semi-Asians”. On the evidence, “Ukrainian historians” do not particularly “bother”, they say, “moskalskie” historians have perverted and falsified everything.
Duchinsky was born in a Polish-Russian family. Studying in Kiev, he accepted the idea of the participation of the Western Russian population in the struggle with Russia on the side of the Poles. In 1846, he left Russia, lived in the Ottoman Empire, France and Italy. During the Crimean (Eastern) War, he was an occupant in the British Expeditionary Force. Then he settled in France and engaged in teaching. He taught history at the Polish High School in Paris. He played for the delimitation of "Rus" (Western Russian lands, formerly under the rule of Lithuania and Poland) and "Moscow". He proposed to exclude the history of Russia from the history of Moscow and include it in Polish history. According to him, Galich, Volyn, Podolia and Lithuania throughout the Middle Ages sought to unite with Poland. And they were inhabited by Slavs, kindred to the Poles, and the east-located lands inhabited the tribes of the “Turanian branch” (this was the name of the Finno-Ugric peoples and the Ural-Altai peoples).
On the basis of these provisions, Dukhinsky developed a theory, which he outlined in the work "Fundamentals of the history of Poland and other Slavic countries, as well as the history of Moscow" (three parts were published in 1858-1861). Duchinsky constantly pursues the idea of a racial and civilizational unity of the Poles with the Ruthenians, opposing them to the "Finno-Mongolian Moscow culture." Moscow, in his opinion, is an “Asian” state, dangerous for Europe. These ideas were warmly received by the Polish intelligentsia. They found a positive response in France. Fortunately, Western Europe has long been struck by Russophobia.
Duchinsky made a few more "discoveries". So, “Muscovites”, in his words, could also be called “chudi” (from the word “monster”), “Scythians” (from “skits” - “wanderers, vagrants”). Also, the residents of "Muscovy" can be called "Turks", since the first, historically well-known Turkish state (Golden Horde) arose on its territory. Duchinsky believed that the foundations of "Moscow" lay in the Grand Duchy of Vladimir, Kazan and Astrakhan Khanate.
Thus, the origins of the Ukrainian “historiography” lie in the rather weak works of the Polish XIX century Russian russophobe. Western Ukrainian "thinkers" practically could not enrich the "Ukrainian history" invented by the Polish panarians and Russophobic ideology. Is that added to the "Ukrainian history" and the Scythian and Aryan periods. And especially gifted wrote about 40-thousand-year or even more “ancient” history of “ukrov”. Although the disease called "Ukrainians" no more than two centuries.
To be continued ...