Military Review

State information space

33
We are not a population, we are a people!



All people live in the information space. It surrounds a person before birth, when in the womb the child begins to hear sounds. After birth, a person begins to see what surrounds him. Information about the world captures a person in his arms and does not let go until his death. It affects his behavior, thoughts, feelings, all his activities.

"Who owns the information, he owns the world."
This postulate formulated Francis Bacon, then repeated Nathan Rothschildand behind him and Winston Churchill. So how does it work? How do states use it? The main purpose of changing the information space in the country is not in the near future. This is the goal a generation ahead. Few people think about such "distant" prospects.

I will try to present my analysis by comparing two information spaces of one state - Russia (USSR) at different times. Epoch One - 1930-1970, second era - from 1970 to the current time. The boundary between eras is blurred, but the changes began at the turn of the 70's.

Epoch the first, the main directions of influence:
  • the formation of a man-creator;
  • the inevitability of punishment for crimes;
  • patriotism and friendship of nations;
  • the predominance of the public over the personal;
  • training.


Cinematography worked in each of these areas, printed (periodical) media / radio, and books were being published.

The films described how people work, overcome the difficulties of life, and achieve the goal, get pleasure from it. The relationship between the sexes was shown without vulgarity. There was no debauchery; instead, propaganda of family values ​​took place. Children's films carried not only an entertainment component, but also a moral and educational one.

Among the books dominated the classics of Russian and foreign literature. Children's adventure novels, fairy tales. A huge amount of teaching literature. A lot of political literature.

The media / radio were informed about the successes of the national economy, propaganda of the heroes of labor was conducted, it was told about the current domestic and foreign policy of the country. Information on crime was filed as follows: caught, exposed, punished. Particularly important processes were described in more detail. They printed real “stars” of their time who glorified the country for their deeds (workers, peasants, athletes, teachers, doctors, engineers, etc.). Posters called for: learn, work, fight, strive etc.

Family values


Even during the Second World War, children's films and cartoons did not cease to be produced, although here there was a natural predominance of the patriotic and military component.

The result of this information space was the creation of population People as a single whole organism. Victory in the Second World War, where people demonstrated personal heroism for a common purpose. Creature scientific community top level. The conquest of space, creating a nuclear shield, country recovery in tight isolation from the world. In general, a generation of people was created who created almost everything that is in the country now.

Work for the benefit


Study, study and study again


Epoch the second, the main directions of influence:
  • creating a human consumer;
  • crime reports;
  • stratification of society;
  • the predominance of the personal over the public;
  • entertainment.


In 1970, advertising for the Western way of life and other “charms” began to seep into cinema. 1973 year, "Ivan Vasilyevich changes profession": prince Miloslavsky sings a song at the "feast" of the king with a microphone from ... a pack of Marlboro cigarettes. Criminal bastard Miloslavsky not caught - he ran away, there was no punishment for the crime. Further more.1977 year, "Office Romance". Careerist and "bureaucrat" Samokhvalov smokes again “Marlboro”, in the car - the “Philips” radio tape recorder, was on foreign business trips. Everyone understands that this is a negative character. He flinches, at work he does not know what, intrigues, but he has a car, he obviously has not so much money as the average Soviet person. That is, personal “success” is obvious. This is clearly a criminal personality, but again she is not punished in any way, and even at the end there remains a “tab” in the subconscious: in order to live this way, you must be the same. And since then, the human consumer has been more and more penetrating into movies and television ... Video salons appear in all cities and towns. The entertainment orientation of cinema and TV is becoming dominant.

Books began to slowly fill with entertainment content: detectives, romance novels, outright pornography. The educational book system has collapsed.

Media / TV / Internet gradually turned into entertaining for the most part. Advertising all the necessary and unnecessary "stars". From the screens broadcast artists of dubious talent. There is a dominance of humorous programs in the almost complete absence of educational. Crimes are described in detail and often become something of a guide to action for those who think about crimes. The punishment of a criminal is rarely remembered only when it comes to high-profile crimes. Posters call for: buy, try, take. Entertainment everyone and in different ways so that the most active part People - young people - sat at home so that there was no time to be interested in education, politics or other development. To powder the brains with a mass of unnecessary information, like: “Sensation! Artist A married the journalist B for the tenth time, and artist B appeared in a new dress in a restaurant and doused herself with soup. ” Ugh!

I will not describe the present time in more detail; you yourself can see everything. What became / will be the result of such an information space can be seen / assumed by ourselves. But from our People make population. And did / make it classic "Window overtona".

PS In the past few years, you can see changes in a positive way, but these changes are of a nature. point, unsystematic. in order to change system, it is necessary to change ... Constitution. Yes, it is her. Through the legislative procedures provided for this.

A few examples, not the main.

Article 13.
1. The Russian Federation recognizes ideological diversity.
2. No ideology can not be established as a state or mandatory.


And it would be necessary to develop a single ideology: we - multinational people!

Article 15.
4. Generally recognized principles and international law и international treaties Of the Russian Federation are composite part of her legal system. If the international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes other rulesthan stipulated by lawthen international treaty rules apply.


For example, if an idiot president signs a contract with another country that we should recognize homosexual marriages, then according to the current Constitution we will do it. Do you think we will not choose an idiot president? If a will not walk on elections - we will not choose, he will be chosen by others. If will not be interested and think over politics yourself choose an idiot. If you will sit at homewhen necessary go to to the street and support those who are real protects your interests, president "Appoint". And aren't we "Chosen" Yeltsin in 1996 year?

Many even those in power do not understand the essence and model of external influence.

In the context of this article Russia did not signEuropean Convention on Transfrontier Television"Because she transfers control supranational bodies and according to the current Constitution, the management of the content of the programs will already be some "Standing Committee».

Constitution of Russia 1993
European Convention on Transfrontier Television
How to change the Constitution according to the law
Author:
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Coffee_time
    Coffee_time April 7 2014 09: 30
    +12
    And right nah ... we need this cross-border television, so there’s nothing to see, but there will generally be darkness. It is necessary to work and revive the Motherland.
    1. S_mirnov
      S_mirnov April 7 2014 10: 40
      +2
      Quote: Coffee_time
      And right nah ... we need this cross-border television, so there’s nothing to see,

      I would have banned domestic television! Just a mountain of information junk. The dominance of advertising and pop. But almost every commercial is essentially FALSE!
      Modern television simply distracts people from real life + replaces the moral values ​​received by the older generation in the USSR with Western ones.
  2. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m April 7 2014 09: 31
    +15
    Serdyukov somehow lost his trace in the vast information space ...
    1. Lelek
      Lelek April 7 2014 13: 29
      +2
      It seems that together with Chubais nanotechnology rules. The great American said: "Here in America, the one who stole a loaf goes to jail, and the one who steals the railroad goes to the Senate." For today's Russia, this is relevant, and even beyond. stop
      1. sv68
        sv68 April 7 2014 14: 03
        0
        Seraindyukov must be sent to America and caught there with a stolen roll laughing
  3. svetlomor
    svetlomor April 7 2014 09: 32
    +1
    For example, if any president signs an agreement with another country that we should recognize homosexual marriage, then according to the current Constitution, we will do it.
    Not everything is so scary, the other day one contract was canceled.
  4. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich April 7 2014 09: 33
    +3
    In the context of this article, Russia has not signed the “European Convention on Cross-Border Television”, since it transfers part of the management to supranational bodies and, according to the current Constitution, a certain “Standing Committee” will manage the content of the programs.
    am and what is this "standing committee"? bunch of liberals? apparently yes! otherwise, nothing can explain this flow of d.u.r.m.a. from all the cracks in the "box" ....
  5. SS68SS
    SS68SS April 7 2014 09: 39
    +6
    ..... And didn’t we “choose” Yeltsin in 1996? .....

    Then the whole country shouted "hurray" about this ..... They were afraid of the Communists, a repetition of 1937. Who was afraid? Thieves and crooks of all stripes and feared. The working people were once afraid. They thought about how to feed their families, then in 1996 ...
    1. 120352
      120352 April 7 2014 11: 25
      0
      SS68SS
      You shouldn't make everything so absolutized. You are confusing "People" and "Population" again.
      Personally, I usually think before doing something. Therefore, he did not choose Yeltsin in any year. After all, a person is recognized and evaluated not by speech, but by deed. And his main business was to deprive me of the homeland. Everything else is an accompanying phenomenon. The collapse of the economy, education, healthcare, culture - this, alas, a continuation, the components of the collapse of MY STATE, to which I swore and remain faithful.
      In 1937 he did not live, but our clan, our family did not escape repression. However, from the moment of my birth and up to now I have not been afraid of the communists and I am not afraid. I myself have never been a member of any political parties, because for me the interests of all our people are much more important, and not of one of its groups = parties. Nevertheless, the career took place. And creating this career, and it was never an end in itself of my individual and social life, but only its result, often entered into confrontation with ordinary members of the CPSU, and with their "leaders" at the level of district committees, city committees, regional committees, allowing himself to communicate with them (and, perhaps, no one else) obscene expressions: that is, "send" from the rostrum of some meeting (and they loved this form of influence) some secretary of the RK, Civil Code, OK KPSS - this is if a functionary deserved, received! What happened next? Some pause. And later everything went on as if nothing had happened. Sometimes they were rewarded with something in pursuit, and the functionary disappeared into another area. I just knew that I was doing people no less benefit than they did. And they knew it. And people.
      He was not a thief and a scammer. At the time that you are writing about, leaving the university in the evening, full of communication with students, you often thought: whether to drive 8 stops to the house by bus, or buy bread. A bus ride ruled out dinner. Maybe that's why I still love to walk, or maybe because it was impossible to buy a car for the professor’s salary. Times are changing now. Values ​​are also changing. There is a certain drift from spiritual to material values ​​when the latter are replaced by the former. But I'm already out of the game. Physical health does not allow. And with the spiritual, I think, order.
      What do you want!
      1. Good cat
        Good cat April 7 2014 12: 22
        0
        120352 You are certainly well done, no doubt (not irony), but in the article
        the impact on the masses was considered, and there are all kinds of people, I grew up in the 80s, and then the desire to work exclusively in my own pocket was already very well established, many slowly laughed at the official ideology, everyone who could did that was dragged from the factories. I understood from the article that it began much earlier.
        1. 120352
          120352 April 7 2014 14: 19
          0
          Good cat
          Thank. In my comment, I tried to answer my opponent, SS68SS, and no more.
  6. ZU-23
    ZU-23 April 7 2014 09: 42
    +2
    Yes, on their television, the Russians already have almost nothing to watch, you can watch some kind of informative programs such as discovery, animal planets. But to watch historical political and news programs from behind a hillock is not to respect yourself.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek April 7 2014 13: 38
      +2
      I agree. Channels: 3, 25, 36, 38, 51 are absolutely useless and even harmful. But, this is my personal opinion, which I do not impose on anyone. No.
  7. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 April 7 2014 09: 44
    +5
    Western cartoons have a detrimental effect on the worldview of children: they teach anger, cruelty, self-interest, the ability to "trip" friends, praise dullness, immorality, deception.
    We need to remove these URLRRods from the screens, such as telepuziki, sponge beans and other faceless ones, asexual, miserable characters that clog up the brains and harm the psyche of children.
  8. mabuta
    mabuta April 7 2014 09: 44
    +6
    The ideology of friendship of peoples is needed more than ever. If a vacuum is created in this matter, then it is filled by someone star-striped who pursues a Nazi ideology to divide the peoples, regardless of nationality. After all, the idea of ​​friendship of peoples in the USSR was key, despite the deviations.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek April 7 2014 13: 41
      +2
      Very harmful banner. Enter on g ... about. fool
  9. smith7
    smith7 April 7 2014 09: 55
    +4
    I am for the propaganda of the "first period ..." from this article. But isolating society 100% from world culture (the culture of consumerism and hedonism) is hardly possible. This is probably not correct. In my opinion, there was one more period, post-war. Russian soldiers (a huge number of the best Soviet people, respected and popular in society!) Traveled to Europe, brought trophy clothes, in the USSR they showed "trophy" films - "The Big Waltz", "His Butler's Sister", "Serenade of the Sun Valley" .. From there went on rock and roll, dudes, hippies. Plus, since the time of the Romanovs' coming to power in Russia, the elite bows to Western values. Let's add these factors and get a complete list of the reasons for the shit that we are now disentangling. After all, almost 200 years of poetry "I look sadly at our generation! Its future is either empty, or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge and doubt, It will grow old in inaction" (1838, Lermontov). And there is only one way out of this situation - to teach children to separate real human values ​​from the "first period ..." from tinsel.
  10. ya.seliwerstov2013
    ya.seliwerstov2013 April 7 2014 09: 58
    +8
    They don’t argue with history,
    They live with history
    She unites
    For feat and labor

    United state
    When the people are one
    When great power
    He moves forward.

    He defeats the enemy
    Joining the battle
    And Russia liberates,
    And sacrifices himself
  11. Grenz
    Grenz April 7 2014 10: 15
    +1
    The essence of the problem.
    The creators of our Constitution themselves admitted that many of its provisions were written under the dictation of "smart guys from the US State Department." Especially under the aforementioned article on the supremacy of international laws over Russian ones.
    It seems clear - harm on the surface. So what. We celebrated with pomp the anniversary of our Constitution.
    We talked about her imperfection and calmed down.
    Tired.
    On the one hand, we shout - the enemies are pressing, on the other, we do not correct the obvious "quirks" that these same enemies skillfully use.
    1. Grbear
      Grbear April 7 2014 10: 27
      +2
      So maybe you need to collect 100 thousand signatures on the website of the initiatives? According to the counter, this website (VO) is visited by 60 thousand people daily. winked
    2. gandalf
      April 7 2014 10: 35
      0
      To change the Constitution, one must go out to the streets and demand. And not 10-100 people, but thousands and millions.
      1. ia-ai00
        ia-ai00 April 7 2014 10: 39
        0
        For a start, you can "collect 100 thousand signatures on the site."
        "Access to the streets" can be used by "citizens" in spirit - maydAuny.
  12. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 April 7 2014 10: 21
    0
    from the Don.
    The confrontation between the Orthodox and the Catholic faith has been going on for centuries, and it is happening now. It is possible and necessary to resist the frenzied propaganda of their imaginary life values. And it all starts with the family: what you sow, you will reap !:
  13. Sergg
    Sergg April 7 2014 10: 23
    +1
    Epoch the second, the main directions of influence:
    creating a human consumer;
    crime reports;
    stratification of society;
    the predominance of the personal over the public;
    entertainment.


    It is said absolutely true. Now comes the era when the social principle must prevail over the personal, this is the only way for the survival of our society and only under this slogan can we become a great power. There is no other way.
  14. pts-m
    pts-m April 7 2014 10: 23
    +1
    Nowadays, there is no where without INFA. Although everyone perceives information according to OWN and comprehends it depending on natural data and state of health at the time of its receipt.
  15. alex47russ
    alex47russ April 7 2014 10: 26
    +2
    The most effective war is now informational! It is very difficult to make out where the truth is, and where is the frank infaga.-In..No !!!
  16. Stinger
    Stinger April 7 2014 10: 41
    +2
    It used to be "Who owns the information owns the world." Now - "Who forms information owns the world"
    1. polite people
      polite people April 7 2014 11: 58
      0
      That's how they adopted the Constitution.
    2. polite people
      polite people April 7 2014 11: 58
      0
      That's how they adopted the Constitution.
  17. Air Force Major
    Air Force Major April 7 2014 10: 43
    +1
    Then in that already Lokhmat year "Constitution" was written in accordance with the requirements of new trends from over the hill. I didn't bother especially with the information field (we all became "friends" good ) The good news is that little by little we start to get out of this crap, people start to think and make certain decisions with their heads. And for little by little, for a little (as they say), you can pull a fly on x ... pull. So that everything will be normal wink
  18. Ilotan
    Ilotan April 7 2014 10: 44
    +1
    Kill - I don’t understand why the words: ideology, propaganda - have become associated with curses. In a popular talk show, one politician throws another one as an accusation: you are engaged in propaganda! Well, yes, propaganda. So what? And the images of narcotic plants on postcards, badges in almost any kiosk are not drug propaganda? Are the rivers of blood from television screens not propaganda of violence? So what for me and my children such freedom of such a speech (and deed). Why cannot and should not the state engage in the propaganda of patriotism and other generally recognized and historically established values? Why do we constantly look back in fright, and what will smart uncles and aunts in the West think of us? Yes, it doesn't matter what they think - we have our own path, our own system of values, our own mentality. Who is older, remembers when we were shown a terribly positive hero on the screen, we knew: there are no such people in life or they happen very rarely, but we must strive for this .And now: "Zhmurki" "Boomer" "Brigade" etc. Is this not propaganda? And we wonder where that comes from: the growth of crime and the decline in morals - but from here.
  19. Giant thought
    Giant thought April 7 2014 11: 07
    +1
    We really lack a well-thought-out ideology of our development. Ideology is the core around which the rest of the criteria settle down. Without ideology, there will be shy things in different directions, which we are now observing.
  20. Leader
    Leader April 7 2014 11: 45
    +2
    The article is definitely correct, but what's the point?
    The Soviet people did not stand up for the revolutionary gains of October in the late 80s - early 90s, having seen enough of the Soviet "elite" of the 70s and 80s - communist party apparatchiks who repeated one thing, thought another, but did the third ... the army was destroyed by political officers.
    The apparatchiks are fed up with all their chatter, instructing everyone to be loyal to duty and the need to sacrifice personal well-being - and at the same time not forgetting about their personal interests. Their insolent kids already became untouchable.
    All these Soviet party prostitutes are now in power and at the feeding trough + a new "elite" of bandits and speculators, thieves and whores has been added to them ...
    If something happens tomorrow, I'm somehow not sure of a "single impulse" ...
    1. jjj
      jjj April 7 2014 12: 40
      0
      That is why today's time seems to me better. In any case, any party leader can be sent openly away. And they won’t put you anywhere for this and will not blame you
  21. polite people
    polite people April 7 2014 11: 54
    0
    The author of the article is right. The constitution is written in such a way
    that it is controlled from the outside. And from the outside it can change.
    And we won’t even see it. Recently USAID (US agency
    for international development) admitted that with his
    participation and the Constitution of the Russian Federation was written 1993 of the year,
    and then - the Tax, Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
    Yes, we are already sailing in unknown places since 1993.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek April 7 2014 13: 45
      +2
      Under the pennant of Sorez. But this does not mean that you need to put your head in the chest of drawers. bully
  22. Cossacks
    Cossacks April 7 2014 12: 09
    0
    Dear Pavel! You just reassured me, if there are still people capable of such thoughts, then not all is lost. And then the previous article of the "new patriot" unsettled me.
  23. saag
    saag April 7 2014 12: 19
    0
    And what is it - everyone says ideology is needed, but no one clarifies which one, what is its purpose, essence and guidelines?
  24. Alexanderrr
    Alexanderrr April 7 2014 12: 27
    0
    smart uncles and aunts in the west

    ... which have no moral brakes, resulting in a lack of justice (objectivity), advertising, propaganda and the promotion of immoral values. In general, where does such a manic desire of the West for same-sex "love" and similar perversions come from? Or those who lie and distort, keep silent about the truth, cease to be people and turn into something that ceases to be a Man or a Woman, and tries to erase this clear line so that everyone becomes the same insignificance as it is.